Upload
nelson-mitchell
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Future Power Generation in Georgia
Georgia Climate Change SummitMay 6, 2008
Danny Herrin, Manager
Climate and Environmental Strategies
Southern Company
Historical Electricity GenerationUnited States, 1990-2006
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Mill
ion
MW
h .
OtherNatural gasPetroleumCoalOther RenewableHydroNuclear
Data Source: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy
1990 - 52%
2006 - 49%
Historical Electricity GenerationGeorgia, 1990-2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Milli
on M
Wh
.
OtherNatural gasPetroleumCoalOther RenewableHydroNuclear
Data Source: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy
1990 - 67%
2006 - 63%
Nuclear
Hydro
Other Renewable
Coal
Petroleum
Natural gas
Other
Current Electricity GenerationSelected southeastern states, 2006
Georgia
Alabama
South Carolina
Florida Alabama
63%39%
55%
51%23%
29%43%
23%
Data source: Energy Information Administration
U.S. Electricity Generation by RegionHistory and projection, 1990-2030
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Ch
ang
e fr
om
m 1
990
Southeast (SERC, FRCC: AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, W MO, MS, NC, SC, VA)
US
West (WECC: AZ, CA, CO, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY)
Northeast (CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT)
Midwest (ECAR: IN, KY, MI, OH, WV)
Data Source: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy
ProjectionHistory
Projected growth
2008-2030
34%
25%34%
22%
11%
Projected Electricity GenerationSoutheast US, EIA Reference Case projection, 2008-2030
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028
Milli
on M
Wh
.
OtherNatural gasPetroleumCoalRenewableNuclear
Data Source: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2007
2008 - 47%
2030 - 57%
The Real Cost of Tackling Climate Change• U.S. population is expected to be around 420 million by 2050.• To meet the 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 we would have to
reduce U.S. emissions to ~1 billion metric tons or go from ~20 tons per capita to ~2.5 tons per capita.
• France and Switzerland that generate almost all their electricity from non-fossil fuels are at about 6.5 tons per capita.
• Replacing every existing coal plant with a natural gas plant would still put us at twice the 2050 target.
• If everyone drove a Toyota Prius in 2050 the equivalent transportation target would be overshot by 40%.“The Real Cost of Tackling Climate Change” Steven F. Hayward Wall Street Journal - April 28, 2008
Generating Options
• Pulverized coal • Integrated gasification combined cycle• Natural gas combined cycle • Nuclear • Renewable energy• Carbon capture and sequestration
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
U.S
. Ele
ctri
c S
ecto
rC
O2 E
mis
sio
ns
(mill
ion
met
ric
ton
s)
EIA 2008
1-3% Heat Rate Improvement for 130-GWe Existing Plants
46% New Plant Efficiency by 2020; 49% in 2030
No Heat Rate Improvement for Existing Plants
40% New Plant Efficiency by 2020–2030
Advanced Coal Generation
5% of Base Load in 2030< 0.1% of Base Load in 2030DER
10% of New Light-Duty Vehicle Sales by 2017; 33% by 2030
NonePHEV
Widely Deployed After 2020NoneCCS
64 GWe by 203015 GWe by 2030Nuclear Generation
100 GWe by 203055 GWe by 2030Renewables
Load Growth ~ +0.75%/yrLoad Growth ~ +1.05%/yrEfficiency
TargetEIA 2008 ReferenceTechnology
EIA Base Case 2008 (Energy Bill)
Electric Sector CO2 Reduction Potential
Achieving all targets is very aggressive, but potentially feasibleEIA 2007
Full Portfolio
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
02000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Trill
ion
kWh
per Y
ear
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
02000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Trill
ion
kWh
per Y
ear
Limited Portfolio
Impact on Future U.S. Electricity MixCoal
w/CCS
Gas
w/CCS Nuclear
Hydro
Wind
SolarOil
Demand Reduction
Demand with No Policy
Biomass
Coal Coal
Coal with CCSGas
Gas
Nuclear
NuclearHydro
Hydro Wind
Biomass
WindElectricity Prices Up 260% Electricity Prices Up 45%
Climate Change Technology Development Timeline
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Renewables
IGCC Capture & Storage Demo Projects
New Nuclear
Retail and Generation Energy Conservation and Efficiency Improvements
Capture & Storage Commercial?
Insights from Recent EPRI Work• The technical potential exists for the U.S. electricity sector to
significantly reduce its CO2 emissions over the next several decades.
• No one technology will be a silver bullet – a portfolio of technologies will be needed.
• Much of the needed technology is not available yet – substantial R&D, demonstrations are required.
• A low-cost, low-carbon portfolio of electricity technologies can significantly reduce the costs of climate policy.
Key FindingsEIA Analysis of Lieberman-Warner S.2191
“The electric power sector accounts for the vast majority of the emissions reductions, with new nuclear, renewable, and fossil plants with CCS serving as the key compliance technologies in most cases. Manyexisting coal plants without CCS are projected to be retired early because retrofitting with CCS technology is generally impractical.”“If new nuclear, renewable, and fossil plants with CCS are not developed and deployed in a timeframe consistent with the emissions reduction requirements, covered entities are projected to turn to increasednatural gas use to offset reductions in coal generation, resulting in
markedly higher delivered prices of natural gas.”
Seeking Solutions - Some of Southern Company’s Notable Initiatives
• Developed, with KBR and DOE, TRIGTM advanced coal gasification technology • Leading a consortium that is researching:
• CO2 deep saline injection demonstration at Mississippi Power’s Plant Daniel • CO2 injection into unmineable coal seams in Alabama • Capacity of an Alabama oil field for CO2 storage
• Researching biomass co-firing • Evaluating conversion of selected coal plants to 100 percent biomass • Planting trees – 45 million, and counting • Winner of 2008 Excellence in ENERGY STAR® Promotion Award for Georgia Power’s compact fluorescent light bulb program• Evaluating significant new nuclear and IGCC generation
Southern Company’s Climate Change Policy Climate change is a challenging issue for our world and our nation. Southern Company is committed to a leadership role in finding solutions that make technological, environmental and economic sense. The focus of this effort must be on developing and deploying technologies that reduce greenhouse gases while making sure that electricity remains reliable and affordable. Southern Company believes that this is the most responsible approach to meeting the needs of the environment and its customers and shareholders.