Upload
ngohuong
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Multi Disciplinary Project Team
(MDPT)
Status update to
Dialogo Nashonal
Future of Isla Refinery
November 26, 2015
Status report
1. Introduction
2. MDPT & Status of Modernization
3. LNG Terminal
4. Socio-economic impact
5. Next steps Modernization
6. Status of Redevelopment
2012 The Hovensa Refinery in St. Croix is closed
2012 The Valero Refinery (owned by Valero) in Aruba is closed
Studies by Ecorys, Purvin & Gertz, Solomon, Shawn etc, result in:
May 2012 “Plan van Aanpak Isla Raffinaderij, Regering van Curaçao”
Bullenbay area selected as site for new LNG terminal
2015 Aruba Refinery ongoing negotiations to restart it
2015 Hovensa Refinery new lease not effected
December 31st, 2019 current Lease Agreement will expire
2
Important facts
Estimated between 11 – 13 % of GDP
Responsible for 17 % of FOREX (Isla Refinery only)
Good for 1.100 direct jobs (high skilled) in Refinery
Good for 2.000 – 3.000 indirect jobs (medium to high skilled)
Direct impact on Curacao as Bunker hub for ships (FOREX)
Direct impact on Airport as fuelling hub for airlines (FOREX)
Direct impact on Aqualectra & Curoil operations
Key to maintaining our standard of living
3
Background info:
Economic Impact Curacao Refinery
Structure of MDPT
Council of Ministers
Chairman Joint Committee
Werner Wiels
Team Modernization:
• MOU
• Scope of modernization
• Reduce environmental impact
• New units
• New LNG terminal
• Manpower master plan
• Maximize use of local
manpower
• Heads of Agreement
• Attract Investor(s)
• New Lease agreement
Team Redevelopment:Hybrid and Fall Back scenario
• Create new opportunities to use
refinery site
• Financing aspects
Project support
• Secretary
• Logistics
Communication
• PBS
Project based
Consultants (a.o.)
• KPMG
• Amec Foster Wheeler
• Poten & Partners
• E&Y
Approach Modernization: Original Timeline
.
Oct16
2014
Quick scan
SOS
Implementation chosen strategy
Negotiations
Kick-Off
meeting
Government Approval
0 2
Prospectus
Preferred
partnerLong list of potential
partners
Task A: Preparation
Task B: Selection of Strategic Partner
4 6 8 0 842 106
Investment
LNG Terminal
Estimated
500 MM USD
PARIC
■ “Delayed Coker Unit”
■ Reformer■ Hydrotreater■ Integrated
Utilities■ Environmental■ LNG as fuel
■ USD 2.9 bln■ IRR 20%
PURVIN & GERTZ
■ Continuation with PDVSA preferred
■ 5000 Thermal cracker with
■ Integrated Utilities
■ LNG as fuel
■ USD 3.1 bln■ IRR 12.6%-15.3%
ECORYS
■ 5.000 TermalCracker with
■ Integrated Utilities, NEWCO LNG case
■ USD 3.1bln■ 70/30 DE ratio■ IRR >15%■ 300 jobs
ABN AMRO
■ Revamping and new Delayed Coker and hydrotreatingunits
■ USD 1.95 bln
Status
Technical audit & remaining life study ongoing
RFP for new Strategic Partner Refinery (Investor) in progress
RFP for new LNG transshipment facility at Bullenbay in progress
New Gas Pipe line from Bullenbay to Refinery designed (for LNG supply)
New stricter Environmental Regulations being prepared (AFW)
Status
9
Negotiation mandate issued by Government of Curaçao to MDPT
Head of Agreement draft issued to PDVSA in November 2014 being
negotiated
October 1st, 2015 kick off of RFP for new LNG Terminal
Regular information sessions with stakeholders
Status
10
More than 16 investors interested in financing
refinery modernization
More than 18 investors interested in financing
LNG Terminal
Make refinery viable for 20 to 30 years
Reduce environmental impact by using LNG as fuel
- Remove sulphur from products being produced
- Comply with EURO 4 norms and future EURO 5 / 6
- Increase salability of products
- Improve refinery margins
12
Objective of Modernization
- LNG as new clean fuel for the Refinery
- At least 12 new units for direct refinery operations
- At least 15 new units to deal with the environment
- Revamp of 5 existing units
- Demolition of at least 5 old units
- New buildings, roads, piping, training facilities
- Upgrading of utilities and power distribution
13
Characteristics related to Modernization
Project Life CycleExpected Accuracy Range
FEL-1: Screening
Phase
FEL-2: Conceptual
Phase
FEL-3: Scope
Definition & B.Eng.
Phase
Tender, Bid &
Award Phase
Design, Procurement &
Construction Phase
Screen
Estimate &
ScheduleFeasibility Studies
for Screening Estimates
Sub Studies
New Business Ventures
Conceptual Phase
Approval
Review study
Conceptual studies
& Engineering
Conceptual
Estimate &
Schedule
Definition Phase Approval
Review study
Basic Engineering
Basic Engineering
Estimate &
Schedule
Prepare Tender
Document
Contract Award
Detail
Engineering
Tendering
Bidding
Evaluation
Selection
Equipment & bulks
Procurement &
Manufacture
Construction
10
3020
40
50
60
0
-30-20-10
Operational inputs to
P&ID’s equipment
lay out etc.
50
3015
9 5
-30
-20-10
-6 -3
Percent
deviation from
estimate
Current TIC Estimate
Approval/
Agreement
Class 3Class 2 Class 1Class 5
-40
Commissioning
Start-up
Front End Loading Phase 3 (FEL-3 or FEED)Schedule ( less optimistic scenario)
Basic Engineering Package & Preparation EPC Tender Document
Detailed Feasibility
EPC Tender/Award
Project Management Contract
4th Qtr 2015
1st Qtr 2016
2nd Qtr 2016
3rd Qtr 2016
4th Qtr 2016
1st Qtr 2017
2nd Qtr 2017
3rd Qtr 2017
4rd Qtr 2017
Government Agreements
Fiscal Terms Agreement Strategic Partner
Project Company
Shareholder Agreement
Final Investment
Decision (FID)
Project Financing
UpdatedNuisance Permit
Valuation Refinery & CRU
PartnershipStructure
B.EngTender/A
ward
LNG RFP
H2
PLANT
CD2
CD3
DHTRevamp
MHC
FCC
Revamp
NEW
CCR
NEW
DHT
NEW
SPLIT
NEW
POST
TR
GA
SO
LIN
EP
OO
LG
AS
OIL
PO
OL
HVY NAPHTHA
GAS OILS
NEW
H2
PLANT
C3
C4
LCCG
HCCG
LCO
NEW
MHC
CRUDE
Existing units
New units
Revamped units
NEW
ISOM
FP1/2
HV6/7
HV8
NAP
LUB
PAR
LUB
NEW
DELAYED
COKER
NEW
NAPHTHA
HDT
NEW SLURRY
SETTLER
LCGO
HCGO
EXT
EXT
ALKY
COKER/MHC
NAP TO CCR
COKER/MHC NAPHTHA
RFY
FUEL
COKE TO
EXPORT
MHC NAPHTHA
SS
NEW
SPLIT
GO
GO
NEW AUXIL.AMINE / SRUN2 / TAIL GAS
Simplified Block Flow DiagramNew Refinery Configuration
Impact LNG Case: LNG as the new fuel
LNG will significantly reduce air emissions from CRU, Aqualectra
and Isla
Isla will also need LNG as feedstock for making hydrogen
Hydrogen is needed to “clean” the products (hydro treating)
LNG can replace other fuels on Curaçao (for transportation, cooking
and other uses)
Using LNG: Less Environmental Impact
Natural gas significantly reduces emissions of sulfur oxides, nitrous oxides, carbon dioxide, heavy metals and particulates to levels that comply with environmental regulations
Schedule for RFP Process LNG Terminal
2015
December
2016
JanuarySeptember October November February March AprilContractExecution
Kick Off Meeting/Workshop 1
Draft RFP (Draft Report 1)
Workshop 2
Final RFP Issuance (Final Rep. #1)
Bid Prep. time (Bidder activity)
Evaluation of Bids (Rep. #2)
Workshop 3
At least 4.000 temporary jobs to be created for at least 3 years
Pipe fitters
Plant Mechanics
Machine Mechanics
Welders
Concrete workers
Refractory workers
Scaffolders, Insulators, Gritblasters, Painters
Electricians
Instrumentation
Industrial Cleaners
Firemen, Supervisors
Equipment Inspectors22
Socio-Economic Impact of Modernization Work Force Development
Massive movement of local personnel to the Refinery
Increase in number of local skilled workers
More revenues for local service providers
Spin-off effect on many other industries, importers, etc.
Increase activity of hospitality sector
23
Socio-Economic ImpactModernization
Macro socio-economic impact
Government bonds will reach maturity
Expiration of Offshore regime
Refinery contract with PDVSA will expire
By 2019, all debt securities of the former Netherlands Antilles will have matured, whereas the bonds issued on October
2010 will start maturing as well
Current lease contract with PDVSA expires on December 31, 2019. The contract will be automatically extended for a period
of 10 years, unless notice if given not to renew it
Curacao’s offshore regime will expire in 2019. An issue of concern for offshore companies as well as offshore banks
Important events:
2019
1.
2.
3.
Next steps
Select Third Party Investor/Technical-RFP
Select Investor/Constructor/Operator for new LNG
transshipment facility at Bullenbay
Total cost and financing issues to be negotiated
Fiscal issues etc. (Government)- draft ready
Reach a new Lease Agreement
Create separate Foundation for the Work Force
Development
Execute the Work Force Development
Model for land development updated and finish
Six (6) Redevelopment Scenario’s defined
Hybrid Scenario is best of both worlds
TOR being made to do a feasibility study of 60 hectares
development at Ex-Marchena Yard
27
Status
28
DRAFT REPORTWork in ProgressSummary scenarios under review
High-level financial insights (Note that scenarios are still under construction, differences may result due to new insights and validation of assumptions)
3. Refineryshut-down, clean + dism&
redevelopment4. Hybrid scenario
5. Industrial Park scenario
6. Maritime scenario
Annual revenues
RDK
Total capital required
RDK
Total Project
investment
Scenarios
Total annual GDP
contribution
Total annual Job
contribution
Temp/10y-Avg:US$ 10m
Perm/End: US$ 12m
Temp/25y-Avg:US$ 26m
Perm/End: US$ 29m
Capital: US$ 680mDividends: none
Capital: US$ 20mDividends: US$ 18m
Investment: US$ 4.0B
Investment: US$ 6.4B
Temp/10y-Avg:US$520m
Perm/End:US$ 298m
Temp/25y-Avg:US$302m
Perm/End:US$ 518m
Temp/10y-Avg:2.600FTE
Perm/End:4.300FTE
Temp/25y-Avg:4.200FTE
Perm/End:7.000FTE
2. Refineryshut-down, Clean-up+
dismantling
Temp/5y-Avg: none
Perm/End:none
Capital: US$ 727mDividends: none
Investment: US$ 0.7B
Temp/5y-Avg:US$ 170m
Perm/End:none
Temp/5y-Avg:2.400FTE
Perm/End:none
Temp/25y-Avg:US$ 39m
Perm/End: US$65m
Capital: US$ 256mDividends: US$ 44m
Investment: US$ 8.8B
Temp/25y-Avg:US$413m
Perm/End:US$ 904m
Temp/25y-Avg:5.700FTE
Perm/End:12.700FTE
Temp/25y-Avg:US$ 39m
Perm/End: US$68m
Capital: US$ 310mDividends: US$ 45m
Investment: US$ 11.1B
Temp/25y-Avg:US$524m
Perm/End:US$ 809m
Temp/25y-Avg:7.200FTE
Perm/End:11.200FTE
TotalannualFOREX
contribution
Temp/10y-Avg:US$ 167mPerm/End:US$ 117m
Temp/25y-Avg:US$ 108mPerm/End:US$ 147m
Temp/5y-Avg: US$ 61m
Perm/End:none
Temp/25y-Avg:US$ 138mPerm/End:US$ 328m
Temp/25y-Avg:US$ 187mPerm/End:US$ 303m
Currentsituation
Current:US$ 20m
Capital: unknown Dividends: unknown
Investment:unknown
Current:US$ 220m
Current:2.700FTE
Current:US$ 30m
Scenario 1 covering a shut-down of the refinery without any economic activities will have no contributions to the aboveKPI’s
Landmap
29
DRAFT REPORTWork in ProgressSummary scenarios under review
Total GDP impact - under the scenarios 4 through 6
4. Hybrid scenario 5. Industrial Park scenario 6. Maritime scenario
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2052 2057
US
D' m
illio
n
GDP overview - temporary and long term added
valuePermanent - GDP
Temporary - GDP
Estimated GDP of current refinery area
0
3,000
2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2052 2057
US
D' m
illio
n
GDP overview (temporary and permanent) -
Industrial Park
0
3,000
2017 2022 2027 2032 2037 2042 2047 2052 2057
US
D' m
illio
n
GDP overview (temporary and permanent) -
Maritime
current refinery area