21
Future Integrated Satellite Architecture Brief to Third GOES-R Users Workshop Broomfield, Colorado Michael Crison NOAA Satellites and Information Service May 11, 2004

Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

  • Upload
    pia

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Future Integrated Satellite Architecture. Brief to Third GOES-R Users Workshop Broomfield, Colorado. Michael Crison NOAA Satellites and Information Service May 11, 2004. Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System. Comprehensive Sustained Integrated. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

Brief to Third GOES-R Users Workshop

Broomfield, Colorado

Michael CrisonNOAA Satellites and Information Service

May 11, 2004

Page 2: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

2

• Comprehensive

• Sustained

• Integrated

Vision of an Integrated Global Observing System

Page 3: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

3

Page 4: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

Implementation Concept for an Integrated Global Observing System

National IntegratedNational IntegratedEnvironmental Observation Environmental Observation

RequirementsRequirementsOther Federal Federal AgenciesAgenciesUSDA

EPA

NASA

DHS

DoD

EcosystemsClimateWeather and WaterCommerce and Transportation

DOC/NOAA

Interagency RequirementsInteragency RequirementsCollection ProcessCollection Process

External RequirementsExternal RequirementsCollection ProcessCollection Process

Research and AcademicMedia and

CommercialMeteorological CentersInternational

Partners

SPACE

Trade Studies

OCEAN LAND AIR

Trade Studies Trade Studies Trade Studies Trade Studies

System F System J

System H

System ESystem N

System L

Federal Program/System Development Federal Program/System Development PhasePhase

Program/System Deployment and Operations Program/System Deployment and Operations PhasePhase

System G

System D

System C

Data CollectionData Collection

Data Data DistributionDistribution

Product GenerationProduct GenerationUser User AssimilationAssimilationArchiveArchive

?PlatformCoverageSensor Suite

?PlatformCoverageSensor Suite

?PlatformCoverageSensor Suite

?PlatformCoverageSensor Suite

?Platform LocationCoverageSensor Suite

International SystemsInternational Systems

Other Federal SystemsOther Federal Systems

Commercial SystemsCommercial Systems

System I

Commercial Commercial Program/System Program/System

Development/Development/Deployment and Deployment and

Operations PhaseOperations Phase

System K

System M

System B

System A

Architecture Architecture DevelopmentDevelopment

System O

Page 5: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

5

GOES-R Constellation Architecture Alternatives Studies

User Needs

Architecture I Consolidated Constellation

Architecture IIDistributed

Constellation

Architecture IIIMed Earth Orbit

Constellation

Notional System Baseline

End-to-End Systems

• Space & Launch

• Command & Control

• Product Generation & Distribution

• Archive & Access

• User Interface & Assimilation

Page 6: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

6

Parameter NPOESS MEO GEO

Altitude 833 km 10,400 km 35,786 km

Period 101 Min 6 hours 24 hours

Returns to same Longitude

~12 hours 8 hours Always Visible

Ground Motion 400 km/min 83 km/min 0 km/min

MEOOrbit

Basics

Page 7: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

7

MEO Walker Constellation8 satellites in 8 planes

Page 8: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

8

MEO Equatorial and Polar Constellation4 satellites in equatorial orbit, 4 in polar orbit

Page 9: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

9

4 MEO Satellites in Equatorial OrbitAchieve Global Coverage +60o

Page 10: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

10

Potential Benefits• Can achieve near real-time global coverage with

relatively small number of same type of satellites• 1/3 the orbit of GEOs – potential to reduce instrument

apertures (ex: passive microwave)• Robust constellation – able to reposition satellites to

reduce impact of on-orbit failures

Challenges• New science – no constant sun angles of polar sun-

synch nor constant viewing angles of GEOs• New instrument configurations

Medium Earth Orbits (MEOs)

Page 11: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

11

Preliminary Conclusions• MEOs probably not viable as GOES R 2012

candidate

• However, great potential for later augmentation to GOES R (P3I) or as part of future integrated satellite architecture

GOES R Constellation Architecture Studies

Page 12: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

12

Integrated Satellite Architecture Example: 3 LEO, 4 MEO, 2 GEO

GEO 1 GEO 2

LEO 2

LEO 3

LEO 1

MEO 3

MEO 1

MEO 2 MEO 4

Page 13: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

13

Page 14: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

14

Integrated Satellite Architecture Robustness Example

GEO 1 GEO 2

LEO 2

LEO 3

LEO 1

MEO 3

MEO 1

MEO 2 MEO 4

Page 15: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

15

Page 16: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

16

Integrated Satellite Architecture Robustness Example 2

GEO 1 GEO 2

LEO 2

LEO 3

LEO 1

MEO 3

MEO 1

MEO 2 MEO 4

Page 17: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

17

Page 18: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

18

Page 19: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

19

Page 20: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

20

Future MEO Insertion/ Transition Opportunities

• NPOESS – 2009 to 2020+

• GOES R-Series – 2012 to 2025+

• MEOs– System capability insertion to meet Pre-Planned Product

Improvement requirements ~2016– Transition to future integrated satellite constellation ~2020+

Page 21: Future Integrated Satellite Architecture

21

Challenges/Future Opportunities

• Challenges– Determine optimum integrated satellite constellation architectures

to balance trade-off between operational capability and affordability– Understand science to accommodate new orbits (MEOs)– Develop new instrument designs/architectures – new orbits, new

technology applications at different orbits, multi-mission instruments

• Opportunities– Integrated satellite architectures, providing

− Improved linkages to NOAA/National/International Integrated Observing Systems

− Better support to operational users