Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
*Corresponding author: Waqas Ahmad, Email: [email protected], Tel: 0086-15602998010
Asian Journal of Nanoscience and Materials, 2018, 1(3), 122-134.
Simulation and Characterization of PIN Photodiode for Photonic
Applications
Waqas Ahmada,b,*, Muhammad Umair Alic, Vijay Laxmid, Ahmed Shuja Syed b aSZU-NUS Collaborative Innovation Centre for Optoelectronic Science & Technology, College of
Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China. bCentre for Advanced Electronics & Photovoltaic Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad
44000, Pakistan. cDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871,
P.R. China. dTHz Technical Research Center of Shenzhen University, College of Electronic Science and Technology,
Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China.
Received: 28 March 2018, Revised: 05 May 2018 and Accepted: 09 May 2018.
ABSTRACT: Research conducted on silicon based photodetector technology has recently shown
rapidly growing momentum to develop the robust silicon based detectors for photonic applications.
The thrust is to manufacture low cost and high efficiency detectors with CMOS process compatibility.
In this study, a new design and characterization of PIN photodiode is envisaged. The simulation tool,
Silvaco TCAD (and its variants), was used to design and simulate the processes of the device.
Electrical and optical measurements such as I-V characteristics (dark current), and internal/external
quantum efficiencies were analysed to evaluate the designed and processed device structure for its
potential applications in photonics and other detection mechanisms.
KEYWORDS: PIN Photodiode, CMOS, I-V Characteristics, Quantum Efficiency.
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT:
1. Introduction Over the last five decades, photodiodes have
been used for extensive range of
applications including commercial use, and
military purposes [1]. Photodetectors are
FULL PAPER
Ahmad et al. 123
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
optoelectronic devices which convert light
energy into electrical energy and are
generally used in optical communication
systems. Typically, there are two types of
photodetectors which are commonly used,
named as p-i-n photodiodes and avalanche
photodiodes (APDs). These devices have a
wide range of applications in various fields
of science and technology. For instance,
they are used in light sensors, diagnostic
tools, digital radiography, and nuclear
medicines etc. The basic operation of a
silicon photodetector is to convert light
energy into electrical energy in which
electron-hole pairs are generated via reverse
bias voltage to increase the depletion region.
Due to carrier drift in opposite directions, a
signal is generated towards the collecting
electrodes. No signal will be generated even
if there is presence of electric field in the
depletion region but the electron-hole pairs
are produced outside. Photodetector
performance depends upon the interaction
of photons and charge carriers in the
depletion region. By increasing the bias
voltage, time performance of photodetectors
can also be increased [2, 3].
PIN photodiode is based on the P-N
junction which has highly doped regions. P,
I and N photodiode can be structured in
different ways as demonstrated in Fig. 1.
The planar PIN photodiode has lower cost
and better efficiency as compared to the
vertical PIN photodiodes [4]. In a PIN
photodiode, intrinsic region is increased to
gain higher efficiency and photons produce
more electron-hole pairs. PIN photodiode
has the capability to increase transient time
and decrease the junction capacitance. The
speed of a photodiode depends upon three
factors including diffusion, drift, and
junction capacitance. In diffusion, the
charge carriers are produced to the outer
sides of the depletion region which are close
enough to diffuse them. The drift time,
which is in the diffusion region, can be
reduced by increasing the intrinsic width of
the junction, while, the junction capacitance
124 Ahmad et al.
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
can be reduced by strong reverse bias [5].
Fig. 1. Basic structures of PIN Photodiodes.
Intrinsic silicon is used to fabricate the PIN
photodiode. In this structure, heavily doped
P and N regions are near the intrinsic
region, therefore it is referred as the P, I and
N diode. In a PIN photodiode, junction
capacitance is inversely proportional to the
depletion region, therefore, depletion region
absorbs more photons. To achieve high
frequency response of the PIN photodiode,
mobility of electrons should be greater than
the holes [6]. Compared to other optical
detectors, silicon PIN photodiode has
various advantages such as lower cost,
higher efficiency, smaller size, better
resolution, as well as room temperature
operation capability. It is used to measure
the position of light and its pixels are used
for image sensing. This type of device can
also be used to measure the short distance in
optical communications as well as optical
Ahmad et al. 125
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
storage. By reducing the surface reflectance,
the performance of a PIN photodiode can be
enhanced [7]. N. I. Shuhaimi et al. used the
Sentaurus TCAD tools to design the silicon
PIN diode. They investigated the I-V
characteristics as well as the effects in
variations of un-doped regions on the device
performance. They varied the width of the
PIN photodiode while the thickness was
kept constant at 40 µm. I-V characteristics
and device performance at different widths
(70 µm, 80 µm and 90 µm) were analysed
and it was observed that as the width is
increased, the current level is also increased,
suggesting the importance of width
optimization to realize high performance
photodiodes [9]. E Abiri et al. described
various applications of PIN diode by
demonstrating a device which is very
similar to the conventional PIN diode with
an extra layer at the centre of the layers in
PIN diode, realizing a device which possess
diverse applications such as modulators and
demodulators, amplifiers, high frequency
multipliers and resonators [9]. W. M. Jubadi
and co-workers used the Sentaurus TCAD
technology to simulate the four different
intrinsic layers of PIN diode with various
thickness (5 µm, 20 µm, 30 µm, and 50 µm)
and investigated the I-V characteristics of
PIN diode. They explored the “I” layer’s
thickness and its effect on PIN diode’s
performance. The results obtained from
simulation showed that the thinner is the “I”
layer, the more forward current flows in the
PIN diode, improving the overall device
performance [10]. A. W. Vergilio proposed
three terminal PIN diode structure which
works at forward conductive state,
demonstrating the accuracy in simulation
[11]. Z. Zainudin et al designed silicon on
insulator (SOI) PIN diode at Athena and
analysed its electrical characteristics using
Atlas Silvaco software. They investigated
the performance of SOI PIN diode and
simple PIN diode and realized that former
produces lower leakage current as compared
to the simple PIN diode. However, SOI
126 Ahmad et al.
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
photodiode shows poor performance in
temperature variations [12]. Here, in this
paper, we developed a simulation based PIN
photodiode using the commercial software
TCAD Silvaco i.e. Athena is employed for
designing the structure of the photodiode
and Atlas is used for the evaluation of
electrical and optical characteristics of the
proposed device.
2. Theory
Photodetection is one of the most emerging
research fields in optoelectronics. Silicon
photodiodes are low cost devices which
have the ability to detect light in different
ranges of wavelength. Silicon photodetector
has unique features such as 90 % surface
reflection, response time approaching to 30
ps and wavelength approaching to >850 nm
[13]. The quantum efficiency of a
photodetector is defined as the number of
electron-hole pairs generated per incident
photon and is given by:
η = (1-R) [1-exp (-αw)] (1)
where, “R” is the surface reflectivity, “α” is
the absorption coefficient and “w” is the
width of the absorption layer. The
photodetection performance can be
determined if quantum efficiency of the
device is known. The sensitivity of a
photodetector, its noise equivalent power
(NEP) and responsivity depend upon the
quantum efficiency [4]. Surface reflectivity
is a unique property of a photodetector
which is defined as output current divided
by the incident light i.e.
)2( = R
where “ ” is the output current and
“ ” is the optical power. It is linearly
independent of the quantum efficiency [5].
A relatively small electric current is present
in the absence of light which flows through
the photo-sensitive devices. Due to dark
current, photodetector can operate under an
applied bias and generates electrical signals
in the absence of light. The performance of
the dark current will be increased if a bias
voltage is applied across the photodetector.
Ahmad et al. 127
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
It has the capability to detect small signals
from the photodetector [5, 15]. In a photo-
detecting device, the noise power is defined
as the collection of light resulting in signal
to noise ratio of 1 or in other words, root
mean square (RMS) noise current divided
by the responsivity is known as noise power
and its unit is . it depends on the
frequency of light and normally
photodetectors are characterized by the
single value of NEP. It is used to evaluate
photodetector’s performance as well as to
compare the performance of various
photodetectors [15]. Detectivity is another
Fig. of merit for a photodetector to evaluate
its performance which is reciprocal of NEP
and is given by the following formula:
D = (3)
Detectivity is also used for comparing the
performance of photodetectors, however, it
is not suitable to find the response of a
photodetector to an intensity spectrum [15].
Noise spectrum of a photodiode depends
upon the electrical frequency. It is used to
find the magnitude of the noise if the
electrical frequency of a photodetector is
known. To find the noise power of the
system, a term, power spectral density is
used which is described as the noise content
as a function of frequency. Mathematically
it is expressed as:
(4)
where, PN is the noise power over a
bandwidth range, S (f) is the power spectral
density, and Δf is the bandwidth [5].
3. Experiment Details
We employed Silvaco TCAD tool to design
the PIN photodiode and investigated its
electrical and optical characteristics. Silvaco
is a simulator tool of TCAD process for
device simulation and consists of Athena
and Atlas [16]. Athena is used for the design
of physical structure and Atlas is used for its
electrical and optical characterizations [17].
The dimension of the designed two-
dimensional device in this study is 2500×22
µm, having silicon with phosphorous
128 Ahmad et al.
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
concentration of 1000 ohm/cm2. 0.6 µm
oxide layer was deposited on the silicon
wafer for the masking purpose as well as a
passivation layer. For making the P well and
N well, it is necessary to make the
geometrical etching at silicon based wafer
to form the P well and N-well. First, we
fabricated P-well for which geometrical
etching was done by diffusing Boron atoms
with a concentration of 8.09 ×1016 on the
left side of the silicon wafer at 1200 °C for
120 min. For N- Well, the right side of the
silicon wafer was diffused with phosphorus
with a concentration of the 8.02 × 1018 at
1150 °C for 70 min. Aluminium is mostly
used for the purpose of metallization to
make electric contacts between circuits of
the semiconductor materials. In the next
step, aluminium was annealed at 500 °C for
30 min. The final simulated structure of the
PIN photodiode is presented in Fig. 2. All
the simulation codes used for the device
design and characterization in this work are
provided in Supplementary File.
Fig. 2. Simulated structure of PIN photodiode.
4. Electrical and Optical
Characterizations.
Atlas is the module of the Silvaco simulator
which is used to obtain the electrical
Ahmad et al. 129
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
characteristics of the device. It is a two or
three dimensional simulator, used to get
electrical characterization of the device.
Atlas simulates the electrical, optical and
thermal behaviour of semiconductors with a
special reference to the output efficiency of
the fabricated device [18].
Fig. 3. Graph between optical wavelength and photocurrent (internal quantum efficiency).
The internal quantum efficiency of the PIN
photodiode is defined as the number of the
charge carriers composed by the device to
the number of photons of a given energy
incident on the device, which are then
absorbed by the device [19, 20]. It is
influenced by the absorption coefficient as
shown in Fig. 3. The internal quantum
efficiency varies with the wavelength of the
incident light.
Fig. 4 reveals the relationship between the
optical wavelength and the current
dynamics. When the light is incident on the
device, every single photon is supposed to
yield electrons-hole pairs. These electron-
hole pairs contribute to the photodetector’s
output current. It can be seen that after
certain rise, it is independent of the energy
of the photons striking at the surface of the
device [20]. High quantum efficiency can be
seen in Fig. 4, which is ensured by the prop-
osed device structure.
130 Ahmad et al.
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
Fig. 4. Graph between optical wavelength and normalized anode current.
Fig. 5. Graph between cathode current and cathode voltage.
The relationship between the cathode
current and the cathode voltage is
demonstrated in Fig. 5. It is referred as the
dark current of photodetection process. The
reverse bias is applied to achieve a very
small reverse saturation current [21, 22].
The device current is also observed to be
decreased as the voltage increases on the
cathode terminal of the photodetector.
Ahmad et al. 131
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
Fig. 6. Graph between light intensity and cathode current.
Fig. 6 exhibits the relation between the light
intensity and the current on the cathode.
When the light has no impact on the device,
negligible current will be observed, while,
with an increase in the light intensity,
cathode current will start rising, resulting in
a linear relationship, as evident by the graph
[23].
Fig. 7. Graph between photocurrent and cathode current.
Relationship between the photocurrent and
cathode current is shown in Fig. 7, which
reveals high detection capability of the
photodiode, when light is incident on it. The
graph clearly presents the capability to
detect even at very narrow scales [24]. It is
evident from the graph that when the
photocurrent increases, the cathode current
increases linearly.
132 Ahmad et al.
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
Fig. 8. Graph between source photocurrent and cathode current.
The variation in cathode current as a
function of source photocurrent is depicted
in Fig. 8 for the case when light is incident
on the PIN photodiode. The photocurrent
increases when the light is incident on the
detector, which in turn increases the cathode
current in a linear fashion [24]. These
optical and electrical characterizations
confirm standard device performance of the
simulated device.
5. Conclusion
A rigorous design approach was maintained
in this work to provide an industrial driven
process recipe in order to effectively design
a “planar” structure of quadrant
photodetector compatible with concurrent
CMOS technology. The trade-off designed
parameters between the quadrant geometry
and PIN photodiode processing yields a
significantly cost effective and efficient
solution to manufacture such
photodetectors. Less number of processing
steps with better uniformity was observed as
an advantage of the proposed design
strategy. The applicability of the process
and the device scheme was testified and
presented as a proficient design for the
consequent fabrication.
Vertical geometry of a photodetector based
on PIN diode structure may be investigated
Ahmad et al. 133
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
in order to evaluate the impact of geometry
on the efficiency of detection and sensing.
Detailed analysis and possible tailoring of
underlining physical model of the
simulation tool may yield a better
understanding on the fine tuning of process
and device parameters for photonic
applications. One may look for other
competing choices of starting material
(substrate), for example SiGe or III-V
semiconductors, to design this device in
“beyond CMOS” approach for variability of
applications.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to appreciate M. Ali
from the Advanced Electronics
Laboratories, International Islamic
University Islamabad, Pakistan for his
precious support and guidance.
References
1. Bank SR, Campbell JC, Maddox SJ,
Ren M, Rockwell A-K, Woodson
ME, March SD (2018) IEEE J. Sel.
Top. Quant. Electron 24: 1-7.
2. Bisogni MG, Morrocchi M (2016)
Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res A 809:
140–148.
3. Palai G (2017) Optik 133: 108–113.
4. Menon PS, Shaari S (2004) The 4th
Annual Seminar of National Science
Fellowship, Malaysia.
5. Yotter RA, Wilson DM (2003) IEEE
Sens. J 3: 288-303.
6. Alexandre A, Pinna A, Granado B,
Garda P (2004) IEEE ICIT’04 1:
142-147.
7. Andjelkov MS, Risti GS (2015)
Radiat. Meas 75: 29-38.
8. Shuhaimi NI, Mohamad M, Jubadi
WM, Tugiman R, Zinal N, Zin RM
(2010) ICSE 12-14.
9. Abiri E, Salehi MR, Kohan S,
Mirzazadeh M (2010) PACCS 1: 60-
62.
10. Jubudi WM, Norafzaniza S, Noor M
(2010) SIEA 428-432.
11. Vergilio AW, Pekarik JJ, Jain V
(2014) BCTM 207-210.
12. Zainudin Z, Ismail AF, Hasbullah
NF (2014) Computer and
Communications Engineering 268-
268.
13. Mohammed WF, Tikriti MN (2014)
SSD1-5.
14. Conradi J (1981) Proc. SPIE Int.
Soc. Opt Eng 266: 49-55.
134 Ahmad et al.
Asian Journal of
Nanoscience and
Materials
15. Razeghi M (2017) Vacuum 146:
308-328.
16. Athena User Manual (2016).
17. Device Simulation Framework
http://www.silvaco.com/products/de
vice_simulation/atlas.html. Accessed
09 April 2018.
18. Atlas User Manual (2006).
19. Fallahpour AH, Kienitz S, Lugli P
(2017) IEEE Trans. Electron
Devices 64: 2649-2654.
20. Qiu X (2018) Adv. Optical Mater 6:
1700638.
21. Yi X, Huang Z, Lin, Li C, Chen S,
Huang W, Li J, Wang J (2017) J.
Semicond 38: 042001-5.
22. Bartolomeo AD, Luongo G,
Giubileo F, Funicello N, Niu G,
Schroeder T, Lisker M, Lupin G
(2017) 2D Mater 4: 025075.
23. Bie Y-Q, Grosso G, Heuck M,
Furchi MM, Cao Y, Zheng J,
Bunandar D, Navarro-Moratalla E,
Zhou L, Efetov DK, Taniguchi T,
Watanabe K, Kong J, Englund D,
Jarillo-Herrero P (2017) Nat. Nano
12: 1124-1129.
24. Su Z, Hosseini ES, Timurdogan E,
Sun J, Moresco M, Leake G, Adam
TN, Coolbaugh DD, Watts MR
(2017) Opt. Lett 42: 2878-2881.
How to cite this manuscript: Waqas Ahmad*, Muhammad Umair Ali, Vijay Laxmi,
Shuja Ahmed Syed. Simulation and Characterization of PIN Photodiode for Photonic
Applications. Asian Journal of Nanoscience and Materials, 2018, 1, 122-134.