22
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH Justin Yoh, The Ohio Department of Transportation - District 7 Mark Nolt, The Kleingers Group, West Chester, OH

From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to

School

Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OHAlex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Justin Yoh, The Ohio Department of Transportation - District 7Mark Nolt, The Kleingers Group, West Chester, OH

Page 2: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Or: How to get selected!

Application and Selection

Page 3: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

• The School Travel Plan• Funding Eligibility

• Pre-application Considerations• Non-infrastructure• Infrastructure• Alternative Funding Sources• District SRTS Coordinator

Involvement

• The SRTS Funding Application• Overview of the 2015 Funding

Application

• Project Selection Process• Project Review• Notification & Next Steps

The Steps

Page 4: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Funding Eligibility

• An ODOT approved School Travel Plan (STP)• Infrastructure• Non-infrastructure

• Any updates to your STP are required to be submitted to ODOT as part of the funding application packet.

The School Travel Plan and Your SRTS Team

The School Travel Plan

Page 5: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

• Funding Eligibility

• Your STP Action Plan should be reviewed and updated annually.• Evaluate the priority level of

each of the action items (i.e. short term or long term).

• Only items listed in your action plan are eligible for funding.

• An updated action plan is required to be submitted to ODOT as part of the funding application packet.

Action PlansAnd

Action Items

Page 6: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Funding Limit: $50,000

• Identify projects that provide high benefit at lower costs.• Printed materials• Incentives• Safety Programs• Limited Enforcement Campaigns

• Reach out to other communities, local MPO’s and advocacy groups for their input.

Pre-application Considerations Non-Infrastructure

Projects

Page 7: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Kate MoeningState Advocacy Organizer – Ohio(614) [email protected]

SRTSNational

Partnership

Page 8: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Funding

• Funding Limit: $500,000• This funding cap applies to total project cost (Design

to Construction).

• PDP Phases Eligible for Funding• Design (approx. 20% of Construction)

• Environmental• Detailed Design

• Right-of-Way (approx. $4,500 per parcel)• Acquisition• Appraisal

• Utility Relocation• Construction• Construction Engineering (approx. 10% of

Construction)

• There is a 20% local match required however, toll revenue credit can be requested to cover the 20% local match.

Pre-application Considerations

Infrastructure Projects

Page 9: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Sidewalk/Shared Use Paths/Curb Ramps

Pros:• Provides needed connectivity• Non-infrastructure programs

see increased participation• Provides separation of

pedestrians and motorists• ADA compliance

Cons:• Higher construction costs• Greater likelihood of right-of-

way needed• Alternative funding sources

needed to fund larger sidewalk projects

Pre-application Considerations

Infrastructure Projects

Page 10: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Signing & Pavement Markings

Pros:• Implemented systematically and at

a lower cost• Designates school zones and

crossings

Cons:• Requires existing infrastructure• Requires additional annual

maintenance

Pre-application Considerations

Infrastructure Projects

Page 11: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Traffic and Pedestrian Signals

Pros:• Provides a more safe means of

crossing at intersections and/or mid-block

Cons:• Higher construction costs• Higher likelihood of right-of-way

needed• Must meet signal warrants to be

eligible for funding

Pre-application Considerations

Infrastructure Projects

Page 12: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

• Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)*• Ohio Public Works Commission

(OPWC)• Congestion Mitigation and Air

Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)*• Safety Program• Small Cities Grants

*Dispersed through Ohio’s metropolitan planning organizations

Pre-application Considerations

Alternate Funding Sources

Page 13: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Involve your District SRTS Coordinator early!

Pre-application Considerations

District SRTSCoordinator

Page 14: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Improving your Application’s Overall Electronic Score

Recent non-infrastructure projects• Shows an overall commitment to

the program

International Walk/Bike to School Day• Register your International

Walk/Bike to School Day at www.walkbiketoschool.org.

Expected Benefit• Focus your projects in areas with a

high density of students or in areas around the school campus.

Funding Application

Overview

Page 15: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Improving your Application’s Overall Electronic Score

Project Funding• Provide at least 10% of the local

match• Utilize alternative funding sources

to increase your local match • Federal funds from other funding

sources CANNOT be used as your local match

Speed Limit• Focusing your projects in areas

where higher traffic speeds are present

Funding Application

Overview

Page 16: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Improving your Application’s Overall Electronic Score

Crash History• Focus your projects in areas

where bike/pedestrian crashes can be mitigated

Right-of-Way• Permanent and temporary

right-of-way takes result in negative points.

Funding Application

Overview

Page 17: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Project Description

Project Mapping• Include mapping showing your

proposed improvement along with the written description.

Written Description• Be detailed in your response• Include as an attachment if

necessary

ODOT SRTS coordinators will be presenting your project for funding consideration!

Funding Application

Overview

Page 18: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

• Electronic Scoring

• All applications receive a preliminary score based on the responses in the application.• Applications are ranked by this score • A cut-off line is established based

upon:• Available funding• Strength of eligible applications

received• Applications above the cut-off line are

further reviewed at the district level.

ProjectReviews

Page 19: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

District Level Review

The overall delivery and constructability of the proposed project is reviewed:

• Project Schedule (requested construction year)

• Project Estimate (funding per PDP phase)

• Connectivity (for sidewalk/path projects)

• Red Flags (R/W, Environmental, Utilities)

• Priority in the Action Plan

Recommended projects are then reviewed by a multi-disciplinary team at Central Office ODOT.

Project Reviews

Page 20: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Multi-Disciplinary Review Team• District SRTS Coordinators• Statewide SRTS Program Manager• Department of Education

Representatives• Department of Public Safety

Representatives• Department of Health and/or County

Health Department Representatives• ODOT Safety Program Representatives• Bike/Ped/SRTS Advocacy Group

Representatives

• The review team will provide the Governance Board with a short-list of projects (school travel plan, non-infrastructure and infrastructure).

Project Reviews

Page 21: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

Governance Board• Makes the final selection as to

which projects are awarded funds.• Total available funding for the

upcoming funding cycle is $4 million.

Applicants are notified of the funding results in May/June at which time the scoping and programming process begins.

Notification andNext Steps

Page 22: From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH

November – December 2014• Begin coordinating your

proposed projects with district coordinators

January – March 2015• Funding round open to

accept applications • School Travel Plan

Development• Non-infrastructure• Infrastructure

March – April 2015• Application Review Process

May – June 2015• Award Notifications and

Scoping Process Begins

KeyDates