10
From: D Buck To: Adam Watson ; Jay Corbalis ; Robert Mandle ; Richard Viola ; Dennis Leach ; Jacob Smith ; [email protected] ; Robert Gibson ; Mark Schnaufer Cc: Gillian Burgess ; Chris Slatt ; Eric Goldstein ; Pam VanHine Subject: 1900 Crystal Drive public comment Date: Sunday, September 29, 2019 12:13:56 AM Attachments: 18th Revised Sketch.png Hello, I am writing in regard to the upcoming SPRC regarding the 1900 Crystal Drive property, bounded by Crystal Drive, Bell Street, 18th Street, and 20th Street. Like several other recent developments in my neighborhood, this submission (and the presentation before the LRPC ) does not conform to or address the Bicycle Element of the County's Master Transportation Plan , adopted by the Board on April 23, 2019. The Bicycle Element has a goal, and places an emphasis throughout, on creating places throughout the County where "all ages and abilities" feel comfortable and safe riding. Here is a good explanation of what is meant by "all ages and abilities." Bicycling planning practice has evolved to where it is possible to provide guidance on what type of facility (a regular bike lane, a protected bike lane, or something else) will make a street comfortable for all ages & abilities to ride, given the number of cars/lanes and speed. The Bicycle Element then provides a map on page 35, that depicts all of the existing and proposed 'bikeways.' A number of streets are shown with 'bikelanes,' with no differentiation on the type of bikelane that is appropriate to the context of the street, in order to make it comfortable for all ages and abilities. However, the Bicycle Element then provides guidance taken from a national transportation organization in Appendix C (pg 46) that lays out what's required on what type of street. Crystal Drive, Bell Street, and 18th Street all fall into this category. The Bicycle Element then goes further, and designates a more select network of Primary Bicycle Corridors, that can be thought of similarly to arterials in the street network (pg 33-34). Both Bell Street and Crystal Drive fall into this category. They have the potential to connect users over longer distances, and... "An objective of this plan is to provide routes within the Primary Bicycling Corridors, either on the primary street or on nearby parallel routes, that all bicyclists can use and experience a low level of stress from motorized traffic." It goes on to state that, " Achieving better bicycling facilities within those corridors will be difficult. Strategies to do so may include: ....reserving land for new on- or offstreet facilities whenever redevelopment occurs.... County staff should be proactive in identifying opportunities to fund and implement bikeway improvements in the corridors." Accordingly, I would like to the provide the following comments with regard to the Bicycle Element and this development: 18th Street S : A previous SPRC for 1770 Crystal Drive approved a public space plan that included unprotected bike lanes, including an inadvisable "trap lane" eastbound intersection approach, and a nonsensical widening of the intersection on the westbound approach to Bell St (attached is a sample from those plans). The number of lanes, large-vehicle traffic, and steep elevation change of 18th Street S mean that unprotected bike lanes are not suitable here. Additionally, the intense activity that both new developments will bring, along with the

From: D Buck To: Robert Gibson; Mark Schnaufer Cc: Gillian ... · From: D Buck To: Adam Watson; Jay Corbalis; Robert Mandle; Richard Viola; Dennis Leach; Jacob Smith; [email protected];

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • From: D BuckTo: Adam Watson; Jay Corbalis; Robert Mandle; Richard Viola; Dennis Leach; Jacob Smith; [email protected];

    Robert Gibson; Mark SchnauferCc: Gillian Burgess; Chris Slatt; Eric Goldstein; Pam VanHineSubject: 1900 Crystal Drive public commentDate: Sunday, September 29, 2019 12:13:56 AMAttachments: 18th Revised Sketch.png

    Hello,

    I am writing in regard to the upcoming SPRC regarding the 1900 Crystal Drive property,bounded by Crystal Drive, Bell Street, 18th Street, and 20th Street. Like several other recentdevelopments in my neighborhood, this submission (and the presentation before the LRPC)does not conform to or address the Bicycle Element of the County's Master TransportationPlan, adopted by the Board on April 23, 2019.

    The Bicycle Element has a goal, and places an emphasis throughout, on creating placesthroughout the County where "all ages and abilities" feel comfortable and safe riding. Hereis a good explanation of what is meant by "all ages and abilities." Bicycling planning practicehas evolved to where it is possible to provide guidance on what type of facility (a regular bikelane, a protected bike lane, or something else) will make a street comfortable for all ages &abilities to ride, given the number of cars/lanes and speed.

    The Bicycle Element then provides a map on page 35, that depicts all of the existing andproposed 'bikeways.' A number of streets are shown with 'bikelanes,' with no differentiation onthe type of bikelane that is appropriate to the context of the street, in order to make itcomfortable for all ages and abilities. However, the Bicycle Element then provides guidancetaken from a national transportation organization in Appendix C (pg 46) that lays out what'srequired on what type of street. Crystal Drive, Bell Street, and 18th Street all fall into thiscategory.

    The Bicycle Element then goes further, and designates a more select network of PrimaryBicycle Corridors, that can be thought of similarly to arterials in the street network (pg 33-34).Both Bell Street and Crystal Drive fall into this category. They have the potential to connectusers over longer distances, and... "An objective of this plan is to provide routes within thePrimary Bicycling Corridors, either on the primary street or on nearby parallel routes, that allbicyclists can use and experience a low level of stress from motorized traffic." It goes on tostate that, " Achieving better bicycling facilities within those corridors will be difficult.Strategies to do so may include: ....reserving land for new on- or offstreet facilities wheneverredevelopment occurs.... County staff should be proactive in identifying opportunities to fundand implement bikeway improvements in the corridors."

    Accordingly, I would like to the provide the following comments with regard to the BicycleElement and this development:

    18th Street S: A previous SPRC for 1770 Crystal Drive approved a public space plan thatincluded unprotected bike lanes, including an inadvisable "trap lane" eastbound intersectionapproach, and a nonsensical widening of the intersection on the westbound approach to Bell St(attached is a sample from those plans). The number of lanes, large-vehicle traffic, and steepelevation change of 18th Street S mean that unprotected bike lanes are not suitable here.Additionally, the intense activity that both new developments will bring, along with the

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprojects.arlingtonva.us%2Fprojects%2F1900-crystal-drive%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343008783&sdata=fEaoeH8Fc7X8xtmUzOhEZVXGngC%2FEvy1ZlJVvt5J89c%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F31%2F2019%2F09%2FLRPC1__CCBP-JK-2019-1-STAFF-PRESENTATION-FINAL-VERSION.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343008783&sdata=EdQ11BB33LrngrJFIoZ6OfWQ8sECNZ5Z5hy3OGgABVg%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F31%2F2019%2F05%2FMTP_Bicycle_Element_2019_adopted.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343018776&sdata=T4nf7aB9WOfoxrQ3%2FOq07kR431rUtB3vxE7SqQzWHgg%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F31%2F2019%2F05%2FMTP_Bicycle_Element_2019_adopted.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343018776&sdata=T4nf7aB9WOfoxrQ3%2FOq07kR431rUtB3vxE7SqQzWHgg%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnacto.org%2Fpublication%2Furban-bikeway-design-guide%2Fdesigning-ages-abilities-new%2Fages-abilities-user%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343018776&sdata=wrRd4asDWe9rTicKO72FiT8u9GhwGKm3juhvMitGDFg%3D&reserved=0

  • second Metro entrance, ensure that these unprotected bike lanes will be constantly blocked bydropoff traffic, like they currently are a block west. This street meet the thresholds warrantingprotected bike lanes in the contextual guidance, cited in Appendix C of the Bike Element.

    I sketched (not to scale) protected facilities that conform to the curblines set by that previousSPRC process for 1770 Crystal Dr (attached). It protects riders from illegal pickup/dropoff,retains the parking included in those previous plans, eliminates the 'trap lane,' protects ridersand shortens crossing distances for pedestrians at intersections, and requires only anoperations change at 18th and Bell that will not significantly delay traffic

    I also noted that the County lists a project page for 18th Street S, that inexplicably promisestwo lanes in each direction for this block. Two through lanes in the midblock are notwarranted by current or future traffic volumes, and set up the aforementioned "trap lane"conflict with the eastbound bike lane approach to Crystal Drive.

    I look forward to a discussion through the SPRC process of exactly how this critical block ofpublic space, leading directly to the Mt Vernon Trail, and the final block on a protected bikelane corridor, will protect vulnerable road users.

    Crystal Drive: Unprotected conventional bike lanes on Crystal Drivehave proven, over the years, to fall short of the goals of the Bike Element. At least for thisfrontage from 18th to 20th, protection from moving traffic and loading/unloading activitymust be provided for southbound travel on this Primary BIcycle Corridor. The draft planspropose to retain the current bike lanes unchanged. With the increase in curbside demand andactivity from this development, this is effectively a downgrade of this lane, and will furtherendanger bicycle riders.

    Bell Street: The Clark Street demolition and 15th Street S intersection realignment projectclaims that a new off-street trail will travel between 12th and 20th Streets. However, conceptplans only show a trail between 12th and 18th. As a Priority Bicycle Corridor, will this projectfully consider and account for inclusion of bicycle facilities in the Bell/Clark area thatcontinue this facility to 20th Street?

    Thank you, and I look forward to your thoughts and further discussion through the process.

    Virus-free. www.avg.com

    https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FCarFreeHQ2%2Fstatus%2F1156699553653018624&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343028774&sdata=UDXeJqYiw80V8bE0XwWP5MJF0uvrjksqJq02FMpPRhs%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprojects.arlingtonva.us%2Fprojects%2F18th-street-south-realignment%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343028774&sdata=dAMASOWm1ZgAZDV64D6jhNBxUz5UB2os9zzWqBIA6LI%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FCarFreeHQ2%2Fstatus%2F1156699553653018624&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343028774&sdata=UDXeJqYiw80V8bE0XwWP5MJF0uvrjksqJq02FMpPRhs%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FCarFreeHQ2%2Fstatus%2F1142552435283640321&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343038770&sdata=ZkZVeUUF%2BGXqg94Es3SRhLQvNxgAdqTJAsI%2FkQUYm0o%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fbrdf1a%2Fstatus%2F1133402519781150720&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343038770&sdata=tzwYh5sGTa70rNdT7EttXbolcKWptbudYz6BBpPYl5E%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fericcvn65%2Fstatus%2F1119684638417539072&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343048758&sdata=J%2FZFyTATBJ3bkPZlI1PD4gipZvO9VSOIb4vF4j5VAj0%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FJosephGruber%2Fstatus%2F792369647177834497&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343048758&sdata=QA6bg%2FRPLOFPa%2Fp12Ipz%2B86KfRAzUVdE10DUxFZL0Bc%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fkbeekman%2Fstatus%2F954819182889226246&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343058751&sdata=oSjFibzJtQqMsR%2BCVgWzhibcZYCVcexY9qhBVUxevdY%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fbikepedantic%2Fstatus%2F1127296480421847040&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343058751&sdata=EtXUMxsuYKS2POF1JKjDPEgmjEo8rHcSCKH7zAuPiDQ%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fjtaylorjones%2Fstatus%2F578614784976879617&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C0%7C637053272343068746&sdata=53b0xWlA%2Bl9E5A52ealBBdXeWWJVKusmJEBsLc9%2F6Qk%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprojects.arlingtonva.us%2Fprojects%2F15th-street-clark-bell-street-realignment%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343068746&sdata=lqpQb86OucpVFeeDY%2FgyrNWZzJzxM7Icw5%2BCkydbGcg%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avg.com%2Femail-signature%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343078742&sdata=Dvs13XePxxGHfuE8xV%2BwGdgoib094h95x4kouRTzidI%3D&reserved=0https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avg.com%2Femail-signature%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail&data=02%7C01%7Cawatson%40arlingtonva.us%7C1978f7bfb2f945321bd208d744936e3f%7C803548041fdf428e9f5f5091e994cf54%7C0%7C1%7C637053272343078742&sdata=Dvs13XePxxGHfuE8xV%2BwGdgoib094h95x4kouRTzidI%3D&reserved=0

  • October 28, 2019 Stephen Hughes Chair, Site Plan Review Committee Arlington County Planning Commission 2100 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201

    RE: 1900 Crystal Drive, Site Plan #50 and #421

    Dear Mr. Hughes:

    On behalf of the Crystal Park Unit Owners Association, we would like to provide you with our concerns and requests regarding the 1900 Crystal Drive Project, Site Plan Numbers 56 and 421.

    We greatly appreciate the efforts taken thus far by JBG Smith to share with us the planning efforts related to the demolition and construction. As the approval process advances, we are sharing in writing our concerns so that they can be part of the discussions and so that the County may reinforce (and act on) several areas about the proposed project. Our requests relate to questions about the 1) design of the South Tower, 2) transportation and other congestion, 3) construction impacts, and 4) adequacy and location of parks/green space.

    1. Building Design and Placement

    The architecture of the South Tower, directly across from our building at 1805 Crystal Drive deserves additional consideration. The South Tower is is not set back from Crystal Dr. like the North Tower and will present a flat, unrelieved surface. We understand that JBG Smith may be providing additional renderings to clarify the appearance of the South Tower from the perspective of our building. We would like to see these to ensure that the façade does not overwhelm pedestrians and retail users walking along Crystal Drive or the residents of our much lower building.

    The North Tower has been designed with greater sensitivity and a better scale. Instead of containing a preponderance of office buildings as envisioned in the long-range plan, this block is being built as largely residential. Given this change, it is imperative that the architecture of the buildings reflect that change, and that the scale of the façades be suitable for a walkable urban neighborhood. In response to this change, we would like to see the design include step-backs that are typical of the other buildings that are placed in Crystal City. We have raised this question of the developer and look forward to receiving clarity about the plan for this façade.

    A significant priority and concern are the shadows that will be cast on our building and grounds. We recognize that the currently proposed building heights were anticipated by the long-range plan, but the shadow study provided by the applicant is partial, only shows the shadow effects on part of our building and grounds, and not does not span a long enough time period to realistically understand the impact. We have requested additional renderings that include more afternoon hours and all of our building and grounds from the developer and look forward to receiving these studies before the November review meeting.

  • To the Site Plan Review Committee for 1900 Crystal Drive, continued page 2 of 4

    2. Transportation (Pedestrian and Vehicle Access)

    The plan does contain good design elements, specifically the new alley with access to garages and for loading. We recognize the value of creating a passenger loading zone that is not located on a public street. Nevertheless, there will be both pedestrian and vehicular congestion with the proposed plan without adjustments by the County and the developer. It is critical to maintain the pedestrian priority in this zone. We want to be involved in the discussions about the proposed solutions.

    a) Vehicular: The proposed vehicular access from Crystal Drive should be a concern for all parties. For instance, it is essential the new alley access be provided conditionally on keeping it one-way, right turn only, and designed to discourage left turns and drivers from cutting through to the garage - such as with a speed table, rough paving materials, or some other approach beyond signage.

    We are also concerned about the congestion that will be created by the vehicles brought into the area by residents, guests, and service providers of the nearly 800 new units. We are especially concerned about the impacts of weekend use. This time period is not generally included in the traffic report and, since the concept has changed from primarily business to residential use, this is a key gap. For this project, the details of the Transportation Demand Management Plan are important to us, and we will be watching closely as the site plan review progresses. We support the unbundling of parking for the two new residential towers.

    Currently, there are studies for each project underway, but there are more than six projects in the pipeline for the next five years on Crystal Drive. We request a single, comprehensive study be completed to alleviate the potential for unintended consequences that are costly, if not impossible to rectify.

    For this project, we question allowing parking on the west side of Crystal Drive during the week and on Saturday. We believe this area in front of both Towers should be designated no-parking/immediate unloading. While the proposal includes the pedestrian priority zone and an area of drop offs, we remain very concerned that, for instance, Uber/Lyft drivers will just stop on Crystal Drive. Crystal Drive south only has one lane. Furthermore, even if vehicles turn into the pedestrian priority zone, they will have to slow down, and back-ups are likely.

    b) Pedestrian/Bicycle/Scooters: At build-out, there will be two 26- to 27-story residential buildings (1,500 residents), a driveway access to the buildings and garage (1,000+ residents), a major park, metro station, bus station, and VRE station with traffic all converging at a single intersection. The multi-modal congestion resulting from the intensity of these uses will need to be carefully managed in terms of bike and pedestrian infrastructure, sidewalk width, and signals.

    While the County has expressed that multi-modal is the desired result, the corner and sidewalks are not designed to handle this amount of foot and other modes of traffic (scooters, etc.). In particular, the County needs an immediate and detailed plan for the Northeast corner of 18th street. Waiting for the planners for the metro and/or VRE project to address this issue will not be timely nor effective. We see the need for a major sidewalk improvement project on both sides of Crystal Drive, including a strong focus on what will be the highly congested corner at intersection with 18th street, and also on 20th street. We request that improvement on the 1800-2000 blocks of Crystal Drive (both sides) be included in this project for 1900 Crystal Drive.

    Over the years, the Crystal City Business Improvement District has worked to bring events into Crystal City – including very large events such as the Marine Marathon and the 5K sunset runs.

  • To the Site Plan Review Committee for 1900 Crystal Drive, continued page 3 of 4

    The additional congestion and associated restrictions on resident movement already strain the current layout and infrastructure. If the County expects to continue supporting these amenities, careful consideration will need to be given to all of the points listed above.

    3. Construction

    We are very worried about the temporary impacts of construction. These impacts include noise, dust and vibrations that affect our building, as well as construction equipment access to the site, and temporary impediments to pedestrians and vehicles on the sidewalk and roadway of Crystal Drive. Our requests include that:

    a) A construction management plan that limits the hours of construction operation, especially operation of equipment that produces noise and vibration, and that provides a safe pedestrian way at all times along Crystal Drive. This plan should also address construction access to the site and ensure that Crystal Drive is not shut down to commuters during peak hours.

    b) Vibration devices be installed and monitored on the east side of Crystal Drive adjacent to our building.

    c) No cement trucks or other heavy equipment be allowed on Crystal Drive. We have already experienced complete blockages of the single northbound lane of Crystal Drive during construction of the 1550 Crystal Drive project.

    d) To be included as an active participant in the formulation of the construction management plan.

    4. Parks

    We request Arlington County take action to ensure development and review of a comprehensive park plan along Crystal Drive that includes green space and dog parks (inclusive of all of the buildings). When construction is completed on 1900 Crystal Dr. and other developments on 23rd street; the number of residents, visitors, deliveries will be substantially greater. Yet, it is not clear when Central Park will be completed. We know that the VRE concept will cut into Water Park, Central Park will not be as big as it included in the sector plan, and we will be losing Green space on the 2200 block.

    Compounding the problem of diminished green space in our residential area; we have not seen any plans for many dogs – likely hundreds – that will come as the new residential buildings are added to Crystal City. The sector plan does not even include the word “dog”. We hope that this plan would include consideration for dog walking, but the only “green space” in the immediate area to 1900 seems to be on our property, where we do not allow dogs.

    Appreciation

    These concerns should not be taken to suggest lack of enthusiasm on our part for the project and the vision for our neighborhood it reflects. In particular, we think the expanded Central Park/open space included in the plan will be an excellent addition to the amenities our community enjoys. We trust that the final plan will address our concerns as investors in Crystal City and as neighbors and will also include a commitment and timetable for demolition of the remaining building and the park’s completion.

    Thank you for your attention.

    Board of Directors, Crystal Park Unit Owners Association

  • To the Site Plan Review Committee for 1900 Crystal Drive, continued page 4 of 4

    Holly Dockery, President Tonya Giannoni, Vice President Jack Francis, Secretary Michael Wiseman, Treasurer Thomas Del Popolo-Fore, Member-at-Large

    CC: Jay Kelly, JBG Smith Robert Duffy, Director, Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing,

    and Development Adam Watson, Project Manager, Arlington County Department of Community Planning,

    Housing, and Development

  • DCA- 1851 South Bell Street Proposal Height Analysis

    (TERPS- Runway 33 LPV Missed Approach Surface)

    Maximum height to

    incur no impact is

    approximately 323’

    Above Mean Sea

    Level (AMSL).

    Ground elevation in

    this area varies from

    37’ to 40’ AMSL.

    Proposed building

    height of 336’ AMSL

    will impact TERPS

    Surface

    1851 South Bell Street

  • DCA- 1851 South Bell Street Height Analysis (Critical Air Navigation Surfaces)

    1851 South Bell Street Maximum Elevation –

    336’ AMSL

    CPUOA SPRC Comments, 1900 Crystal Drive Project 28 October 20191900 Crystal Drive public commentMWAA-AW 1851 S.Bell_package