From BS5950 to EC3

  • Upload
    bsitler

  • View
    238

  • Download
    18

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    1/40

    rom o

    Chiew Sing-PingSchool of Civil and Environmental En ineerin

    Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    2/40

    Basis of design combination of actions

    Structural analysis imperfections &-

    Member design beam & columnuc ng

    Web bearin & bucklin

    Shear buckling & plate girder w

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    3/40

    Trend is to use higher grade and better quality

    EC3 has additional ductility requirements

    compare o . . . n erms o

    stress ratio, elongation and strain ratio. It is okay for hot-rolled steel but will be difficult

    - -

    section.

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    4/40

    uc y equ remen

    Normal Strength Steelf < 460 N/mm2

    High Strength Steel460 < f < 700 N/mm2

    fu/fy 1.10

    fu/fy 1.05 ( EC3-1-12) u y . or p as c ana ys s

    elongation at failure not

    fu/fy 1.10 ( UK NA to EC3-1-12)

    elon ation at failure not

    u 15 y ( y is the yieldless than 10%

    15 s ra n,

    y=

    y

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    5/40

    -

    f

    fyUpper

    yLower

    tress

    u Strainy

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    6/40

    -

    f

    fyUpper

    yLower

    tress

    amount of plastic deformation

    represented by shaded area under the

    curve

    u Strainy

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    7/40

    Problem 1 Steel for Cold ForminSome product standards only have requirements on the nominal

    yield and tensile strengths, or their minimum values. The stress

    ratio calculated according to these nominal values cannot comply

    with the EC3 ductility requirement.

    Standard Grade Nominal yieldstrength (MPa)

    Nominal tensilestrength (MPa)

    Stress ratio

    AS1397

    G450 450 480 1.07

    G500 500 520 1.04

    G550 550 550 1.00

    AS 1595 CA 500 500 510 1.02

    S 550MC 550 600 1.09

    EN 10149-2 .

    S 650MC 650 700 1.08

    S 700MC 700 750 1.07

    EN 10326 S550GD 550 560 1.02

    .

    AS 1397: Steel sheet and strip hot-dip zinc-coated or aluminium/zinc-coated

    AS 1595: Cold-rolled, unalloyed, steel sheet and strip

    EN 10149-2: Hot-rolled flat products made of high yield strength steel for cold forming

    EN 10326: Continuously hot-dip coated strip and sheet of structural steels

    ISO 4997: Cold-reduced carbon steel sheet of structural quality

    steel for profile metal decks and purlins

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    8/40

    Problem 2 Cold Formed Sections

    Most standards only have requirements on the range of tensile. .

    face problem with EC3 ductility requirement, for e.g. S355J2H in BS

    EN10219: fy>355 MPa and 470 MPa

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    9/40

    Mechanical Pro erties due to Cold Workin

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    10/40

    Typical Curve with no distinct Yield Point

    - gain in yield and loss in ductility due to cold working

    ss

    Rm

    Str p

    Rt

    StrainAgt AtA

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    11/40

    Toughness Requirement

    To prevent sudden brittle fracture failure, both adopteda s mp e eeme - o-sa s y es gn approac y

    ensuring the maximum permitted thickness value is

    adequate notch toughness, taking into account factors

    , , ,

    member shape and detail, stress level and strain rate.

    , - -

    for brittle fracture using fracture mechanics in addition

    .

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    12/40

    SteelQuality

    Grade

    (Ed= 0.75 fy) (t)

    (Ed = 0.5 fy) (t)

    (Ed )> 0.3 fy) (t)

    10 (20)C 0C 10 (20)C 0C 20C 0C

    S275

    JR 55 45 80 70 71 50J0 75 65 115 95 103 71

    J2 110 95 155 130 148 103

    M,N 135 110 180 155 178 124

    ML,NL 185 160 200 200 250 178

    JR 40 35 65 55 50 35

    S355

    J0 60 50 95 80 72 50

    J2 90 75 135 110 104 72

    M,N 110 90 155 135 124 86

    Notes: (1) The units for the thickness values are mm.

    ML,NL 155 130 200 180 179 124

    e g es re erence empera ure a a owe s .

    (3) This comparison is done under generally welded and high stress condition

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    13/40

    load combinations are given in Table 2 of BS5950.

    Fundamental combination of actions can be determined

    from Eqns. 6.10, 6.10a or 6.10b of EN1990.

    +++> 1i

    ik,i,iQ,k,1Q,1p1

    jk,kG, QQPG (6.10)

    Action due to

    prestressing

    Leading variable

    action

    Non-leading variable

    actions

    Permanent

    actions

    From SS NA of EN1990= .

    0= 0.7 for the imposed load;

    G = 1.35 for unfavorable permanent action;

    Q = . or ea ng or non- ea ng var a e ac on.

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    14/40

    Combination of Actions

    Combination Design Action

    Dead & imposed 1.4Gk+ 1.6Qk 1.35Gk+ 1.5Qk

    Dead & wind 1.4G + 1.4W 1.35G + 1.5W

    Dead, imposed & wind 1.2Gk+ 1.2Qk+ 1.2Wk 1.35Gk+ 1.05Qk+ 1.50Wkor

    1.35Gk+ 1.50Qk+ 0.75Wk

    Gk= permanent action; Qk= imposed variable action; Wk= wind variable action

    Example: Gk= 20 kN; Qk= 10 kN; Wk= 8 kN

    Design Action

    BS5950 EN1990Dead & imposed 44.0 kN 42.0 kN

    Dead, imposed & wind 45.6 kN 49.5 kN or 48.0 kN

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    15/40

    -

    Global imperfections for frames and bracing systems,

    such as global initial sway imperfections =0hm in

    Local im erfections for members

    The effects of local imperfections in members are

    generally incorporated within the formulae given for .

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    16/40

    Frame Im erfection in BS5950

    BS5950 uses the notional horizontal force (NHF) concept to

    F3 F3

    a ow or rame mper ec on suc as ac o rame ver ca y

    F2F2 F2

    =

    F1F1 F1

    1 n 200 = 0.5%

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    17/40

    Global Im erfection in EC3

    EC3 uses the same concept but called it equivalenthorizontal force (EHF) to allow for initial sway imperfection

    (lack of verticality) in frame

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    18/40

    Combination of Actions

    CombinationDesign Action

    BS5950 EC3

    Dead & imposed 1.4Gk + 1.6Qk + NHF 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk + EHF

    *ea w n . k . k no . k . k

    Dead, imposed & wind 1.2Gk + 1.2Qk+ 1.2Wk* (no NHF) 1.35Gk + 1.05Qk+ 1.50Wk + EHF

    or

    1.35Gk + 1.50Qk+ 0.75Wk+ EHF

    In BS5950, minimum Wk is 1% of factored dead load;

    this is to provide a minimum level of robustness but

    why no NHF when the wind is blowing?

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    19/40

    Structural Anal sis - Terminolo

    First-order analysis: Equilibrium equations are written

    in terms of the geometry of the undeformedstructure,

    geometrical non-linearity not considered Second-order anal sis: E uilibrium e uations are

    written in terms of the geometry of the deformed

    structure, geometrical non-linearity considered Elastic analysis: Material properties is assumed to be

    elastic and often linear

    Inelastic analysis: Inelastic material properties

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    20/40

    T es of tructural Anal sis

    First-order, second-order, elastic and inelastic analyses y : x u y,

    represents conditions under normal service loads very well

    considered. It produces good representation of destabilizing

    -

    First order inelastic analysis: Geometrical nonlinearity

    abruptly (e.g. onset of plastic hinge)

    Second order inelastic anal sis: Both eometrical and

    material nonlinearity are considered. Enable you to tracethe behavior of the structure up to ultimate state and failure

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    21/40

    Level of Non-Linearit

    nd. , , , . . ,John Wiley & Sons, 2000

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    22/40

    BS5950 EC3

    .

    First-order elastic analysis (initial

    geometry and influence of deformation

    not considered)

    First-order analysis

    Elastic global analysis

    First-order plastic analysis (small axial

    forces & no instability effects)

    Plastic global analysis

    Using first-order analysis, if:

    Second-order elastic analysis (can use

    simplified methods such as amplified

    cr 10 for elastic analysis

    methods for sway sensitive frames

    where 4 < cr< 10)

    cr= Fcr/Fed, Fcr is the elastic critical

    buckling load

    Other advanced analyses (generallynot covered)

    Second-order analysis (influence ofgeometrical deformation taken into

    account)

    Allowed more advanced analyses

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    23/40

    -

    The frame P-big effect is allowed for in BS5950 using either one of thefollowing 2 methods:

    Amplified sway method - the sway moments are multiplied by an,

    Effective length method - the actual sway effective lengths from thecharts in Annex E are used.

    The column P-small effect is allowed for in BS5950 indirectly through

    - .

    Note: Although EC3 also allows amplified sway moment or effective

    length approach, less guidance is given. Unlike BS5950 which

    facilitates hand calculations, EC3 focuses on global second-order

    . .

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    24/40

    -

    Simplified method:Amplified the sway moments

    Exact method:Moments about minor axis only:

    -

    1++yy

    yy

    xy

    xx

    C

    C

    Zp

    m

    Zp

    m

    P

    FIn-planebuckling 11

    ++cy

    c

    cy

    yy

    cy

    c

    PF

    M

    m

    PF In-planebuckling

    way e ective length rom Annex E

    Lateral-torsional

    buckling

    15.0 +cy

    yyx

    cx M

    Mm

    P

    Fc Out-of-planebuckling

    1++yyLTLT

    MmMmFc

    Moment about major axis only:

    15.01

    ++ cxxcFMmF In-plane

    bcy

    cxcxcx

    15.0 + LTLTMm

    P

    FcOut-of-plane

    bucklincy

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    25/40

    Rigorous method:

    =

    General method:

    x

    Mb = PbZxMb = PbSx,eff for class 3

    1M

    y

    yLTRd,b WM =

    1

    b b x,eff

    For non-uniform moment or unequal

    LT ,2LT

    2LTLT

    LT

    +

    2 fWen momen :

    Mx Mb/mLT and Mx Mcxwhere LT is imperfection factor

    ++= LTLTLTLT ,,

    cr

    LTM

    =

    where Pb determined by

    LT = u v(w)0.5LE/ry

    depending on which buckling curves

    (Figure 6.4 of EC3)

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    26/40

    Member Desi n Com ressive Resistance

    BS5950 EC3

    Pc =pcAg for class 1, 2 & 3 for class 1, 2 & 31M

    y

    Rd,b

    AfN

    =

    Pc =pcsAeff for class 4 for class 41M

    yeff

    Rd,bN

    =

    c

    based on the strut curve, slenderness

    & design strengthpy

    buckling mode1

    =

    = L/r r= (I/A)0.5

    but 1,0

    +

    .

    where is imperfection factor( )

    ++=2

    2,015,0cr

    yeff

    N

    f=

    depending on buckling curves (EC3 has

    5 curves).

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    27/40

    EC3 offers no formulae and gives no guidance on how to calculateNcrand Mcr.

    .

    2EI5.0

    22 Tcrw GIIEI

    2

    cr

    crL

    =221

    =

    zZcr

    crEIIL

    where Lcr is the effective length and C1 is the correction factor for

    non-uniform and unequal end moments. Unlike BS5950, EC3 does

    uniform moment factors.

    W b B i d B kli

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    28/40

    Web Bearin and Bucklin

    BS5950-1 requires two independent checks for web bearing

    with these two failure modes for the web subjected to a

    transverse force.

    However, unlike BS5950, EC3 does not take unrestrainedflan e into account flan e free to swa or rotate .

    Flange free to sway

    sideways

    Flange rotation

    relative to the web

    W b B i d B kli

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    29/40

    Web Bearin and Bucklin

    BS5950 EC3e ear ng: bw = 1 + n pyw

    Web buckling:

    es s ance o we aga ns

    transverse force in which their

    compression flange is adequately

    for unstiffened web &

    c> 0.7d restrained in the lateral direction:

    bwx Pt

    P25

    =

    weffyw tLf

    For unstiffened web & c< 0.7d

    n11M

    Rd

    eff

    resistance against transverse force:bwe

    x Pdnkbd

    P)(4.1

    .

    1 +=

    = 0.15.0 =

    Pd

    P7.0

    =

    yeF

    wFcr

    tEkF

    3

    9.0= ywwyFftl

    =

    Ew cr

    Web Bearin and B cklin

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    30/40

    Web Bearin and Bucklin

    EC3 has no equations to calculate stiff bearing length except saying the

    over which the applied load is effectively distributed at a slope of 1:1,

    and Ss should not be larger than hw. (EC3-1-5, clause 6.3.1)

    BS5950-1 EC3-1-5

    The Straits Times, 3 Augus t 2004The Straits Times, 3 Augus t 2004

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    31/40

    Shear Bucklin and Plate Girder

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    32/40

    Shear Bucklin and Plate Girder

    BS 5950-1 Web with depth-to-thickness ratio d/t > 62 is susceptible

    to shear buckling.

    Shear buckling resistance Vb of the thin web is taken as w

    Vb

    = Vw

    = d t qw

    where d is the depth of the web;

    t is the web thickness

    qw is the shear buckling strength of the web

    Shear Bucklin and Plate Girder

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    33/40

    Shear Bucklin and Plate Girder

    EC3-1-5 Web with hw/tgreater than should be checked for

    resistance to shear buckling.

    The design resistance for shear buckling is taken as:

    (5.1),,,3

    wywRdbfRdbwRdb

    thfVVV +=

    in which the contribution from the web and flanges are:

    (5.2)1

    , 3 M

    wyww

    Rdbw V =

    (5.3)

    =

    22

    , 1Edyfff

    Rdbf

    MftbV

    ,1 RdfM

    Shear Bucklin Resistance

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    34/40

    Shear Bucklin Resistance

    Stiffener spacing ratio, a/d (a/hw) = 1, fy = 275 N/mm2

    160

    180

    )0.6275=165 EC3 rigid end post TFA

    140

    (N/mm qw (BS5950-2000)TFA

    EC3 non-rigid end post TFA

    100gthqw

    qcr(BS5950-1990) No TFA

    60arstre

    61

    71

    55.7

    20

    40sh

    28

    0

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300

    .

    we ep - o- c ness ra o w

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    35/40

    the applied shear forcesTension Field Action TFA

    when elastic critical

    shear buckling

    resistance is

    exceeded

    Tension field action is mobilized in both BS5950 and EC3 torealize much hi her shear bucklin resistance of the thin web

    Wh the fuss over Hollow Section Joint?

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    36/40

    Wh the fuss over Hollow Section Joint?

    Hollow section joints can be very flexible because they are unstiffened!

    Designing unstiffened welded hollow section joints is a skilled task and must

    be done at member design stage.

    Potential Failure Modes

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    37/40

    Potential Failure Modes

    Mode A: Plastic failure of

    Mode B: Punching shear

    failure of the chord facethe chord face

    Mode D: Local buckling of

    the web member

    Potential Failure Modes

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    38/40

    Potential Failure Modes

    Mode E: Overall shear failureof the chord

    Mode F: Local buckling ofthe chord walls

    Mode G: Local bucklin ofthe chord face

    Verification

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    39/40

    Verification

    Topic BS5950 EC3

    Material

    uc y Toughness

    Basis - combination of actions Im erfections

    analysis

    Second-order effects

    em er uc ng eam co umn Web bearing & buckling Shear buckling & Plate girder Hollow section oints

    Final oncludin Remarks

  • 7/22/2019 From BS5950 to EC3

    40/40

    Final oncludin Remarks

    -adequate and safe for use in the short term.

    .

    EC3 is more comprehensive but its terminology,

    sym o s an va ues are very eren an mu p e

    documents are needed. Re-training is absolutely necessary in view of time

    frame and ma nitude of chan e involvin man

    design codes and documents. .