Upload
hoangtuong
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Fraud: Essential Audit Tools and Techniques HO1
Thomas E. Noce, CPA, CFE
Learning today. Leading tomorrow.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Fraud: Essential Audit Tools & Techniques
Thomas Noce, CPA, CFECalCPA Education Foundation
1
A Few Reminders…..
• Turn off or silence your cell phones• Today’s class will be 200 minutes
long & count for 4 hours of CPE• If you need to leave early, you must
sign the sheet located at the registration table
• Electronic evaluation will be sent within 24 hours
2
2
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Learning Objectives• Gain knowledge needed to comply
with professional standards relating to fraud
• Provide an overview of professional standards requirements relating to audit planning
• Provide practical implementation guidance for AU-C Sec 240
• Examine common methods of asset misappropriation & fraudulent financial reporting schemes
3
ScheduleAM SessionFrom To8:30 8:45 Section 1: Introduction & References
8:45 10:15 Section 2: Overview of Risk Assessment Standards
10:15 10:25 Break
10:25 12:00 Section 3: Considering Fraud – Thinking Like a Crook
PM SessionFrom To1:00 1:15 Section 1: Introduction & References
1:15 2:45 Section 2: Overview of Risk Assessment Standards
2:45 2:55 Break
2:55 4:30 Section 3: Considering Fraud – Thinking Like a Crook
4
3
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Introduction & References
• Audit Risk Alert Summary (p.5)
• Pronouncement Summary (p. 9)
• Other Stuff (p.11)
5
Mini Case 3.2:On the Hook TowingSee case facts in handout & consider:1. What elements of the fraud triangle
are present here?2. Put yourself in Lottie’s position. How
would you steal from On the Hook Towing?
3. Are there internal control weaknesses present that management should be made aware of?
6
4
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Section 2: Overview of the Risk Assessment Standards
7
Section 2Objectives1. To provide a background as to the
evolution of the “risk assessment” suite of standards
2. Gain an understanding of fundamental concepts necessary to implement risk assessment procedures
3. To compare & contrast requirements of current standards with those recently issued as clarity standards
4. To gain an understanding of the audit risk model
8
5
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Changing Audit Model
9
Control SystemTransactions
Financial Statements
“Maximum Risk”
What Prompted Change?
• Perception of current methodologies– Checklist/”connect the dots”
approach to auditing– Using “default to maximum risk”
effectively took the thought process out of auditing
• Not gaining a thorough understanding of client’s internal controls
10
6
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Risk Continuum
11
Risk of Material Misstatement for Any Audit Area
0% Error 100% Error
Medium HighLow
MAXIMUM RISK DEFAULT
Fundamental Concepts
• Materiality & tolerable misstatement
• Audit risk & the risk of material misstatement
• Financial statement assertions
12
7
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Materiality
• Section is updated for the Clarity Standards
• Overall concept is unchanged• Some new terms & requirements
13
More than Numbers
• Materiality is determined based on the auditor’s understanding of the user needs & expectations
• User expectations may differ based on the degree of inherent uncertainty associated with the measurement of particular items in the financial statements
14
8
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Preliminary Judgment of Materiality
Commercially published benchmarks
vs.
Professional judgment
Commercially published benchmarks
vs.
Professional judgment
15
Materiality: Definitions
Performance materiality –– The amount or amounts set by the auditor at less
than materiality for the financial statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected & undeleted misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
– If applicable, performance materiality also refers to the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures.
– Performance materiality is to be distinguished from tolerable misstatement (now appears to be reserved for audit sampling.)
16
9
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Materiality: Requirements
• Establish materiality for financial statements as a whole– If appropriate, establish lower
materiality for particular areas
• Determine performance materiality• Revise all materiality levels as
appropriate based on new facts & circumstances
17
Materiality: Documentation
• Materiality for the financial statements as a whole
• If applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances, or disclosures
• Performance materiality • Any revision of (a) - (c) as the audit
progressed
18
10
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Fundamental Concepts
• Materiality & tolerable misstatement
• Audit risk & the risk of material misstatement
• Financial statement assertions
19
Misstatements
• Errors• Fraud
– Fraudulent financial reporting– Misappropriation of assets
20
11
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Audit RiskDefinition
“The risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit
opinion when the financial statements are materially
misstated. Audit risk is a function of the risks of material
misstatement & detection risk”
21
Components of Audit Risk
• Financial statement level• Account balance or class of
transaction level
22
12
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Components of Audit Risk:Account Balance Level• The risk (inherent & control risk)
that the relevant assertions contain misstatements that could be material to the financial statements when aggregated with misstatements
• The risk (detection risk) that the auditor will not detect such misstatements.
23
Audit Risk Model
AR RMM DR
24
This model is not intended to be a mathematical formula.
13
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Auidit Risk Model
• Inherent risk & control risk are the entity’s risks to manage
• The risk of material misstatement (RMM) is the auditor’s combined assessment of inherent risk & control risk
25
RMM IR CR
Inherent Risk (IR)
“The susceptibility of an assertion to a misstatement that could be material, either individually or
when aggregated with other misstatements, assuming there are
no related controls.”
26
14
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Inherent Risk Factors
• Client bias• Volume• Complexity• Susceptibility of asset to theft• Estimates• Industry circumstances• Other external factors
27
Understanding Client Bias
So, what is client bias?
28
15
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Client Bias Considerations
• What is the intended use of the financial statements likely to be?
• Management’s business or financing plans
• Your prior experience with the client
• Could be indicator of primary direction of the risk– Understated– Overstated
29
Control Risk (CR)
“The risk that a misstatement could occur in a relevant assertion
that could either be material, individually or when aggregated
with other misstatements, & would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the entity's internal
control.”
30
16
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Detection Risk (DR)
• Risk that the auditor will not detect a material misstatement that , either individually or when aggregated – Is a function of the effectiveness of
an audit procedures & of its application by the auditor
– Cannot be reduced to zero
31
To Summarize…
• AR = RMM x DR• RMM = IR + CR
Relevant Assertion E C VRMM L M H
DR(Audit tests)
AR L L L
32
17
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
To Test or Not to Test?
• AR = RMM x DRRMM = IR + CR
L = H + LRelevant Assertion E C VRMM L M H
DR(Audit tests)
AR L L L
33
Fundamental Concepts
• Materiality & tolerable misstatement
• Audit risk & the risk of material misstatement
• Financial statement assertions
34
18
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Using Assertions
An assertion is a declaration or positive statement (implicit or explicit) made by management about the financial statement
information presented
35
Assertions Relevant to Account Balances• Existence - Assets, liabilities, & equity
interests exist.
• Completeness - All assets, liabilities, & equity interests that should have been recorded have been recorded.
• Rights & obligations - The entity holds or controls the rights to assets, & liabilities are the obligations of the entity.
• Valuation & allocation - Included in the financial statements at appropriate amounts & any resulting valuation or allocation adjustments are appropriately recorded.
36
19
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Assertions Relevant toClass of Transactions• Occurrence - Transactions & events that
have been recorded have occurred & pertain to the entity.
• Completeness - All transactions & events that should have been recorded have been recorded.
• Accuracy - Amounts & other data relating to recorded transactions & events have been recorded appropriately.
• Cutoff - Transactions & events have been recorded in the correct accounting period.
• Classification - Transactions & events have been recorded in the proper accounts.
37
Assertions Relevant toPresentation & Disclosure• Occurrence & rights & obligations -
Disclosed events & transactions have occurred & pertain to the entity.
• Completeness - All disclosures that should have been included in the financial statements have been included.
• Classification & understandability -Financial information is appropriately presented & described & disclosures are clearly expressed.
• Accuracy & valuation - Financial & other information are disclosed fairly & at appropriate amounts.
38
20
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Relevant Assertions
“For each significant class of transactions, account balance, & presentation & disclosure, the auditor should determine the
relevance of each of the financial statement assertions.”
39
Applying the Audit Risk Model
40
21
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Applying the Audit Risk Model• Gather information about the entity &
its environment, including internal control
• Gain an understanding about the entity & its environment, including internal control
• Assess the risk of material misstatement (including fraud risk!)
• Design & perform overall responses & further audit procedures
• Evaluate audit findings
41
Step 1:Risk Assessment ProceduresPerformed to obtain an understanding of the entity & its environment, including its internal control, ultimately to assess the risks of material misstatement at the financial statement & relevant assertion levels include:
– Inquiries of management & others within the entity
– Analytical procedures– Observation & inspection– Discussion among the audit team
42
22
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Step 2: Understanding the Entity & Its Environment
Obtain & Support an
Understanding of the Entity & Its Environment
Nature of the Entity
Business Processes
Measurement & Performance
Objectives & Strategies
Governance
Management
Industry, Regulatory, & Other External
Factors
43
Step 3: Assess Risk of Material Misstatement
Identify significant business risks that may result in material misstatements
Identify other risks that may result in material misstatements
Evaluate the entity’s responses to address the risks identified
.
44
23
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Step 4: Design & Perform Responses
45
Assess the risk of material misstatement at the assertion level & determine the audit procedures
Lower Risk Assertions
Design & Perform ProceduresDesign & Perform Focused Procedures
Higher Risk Assertions
Evaluate if the assessments of risk were appropriate & whether sufficient audit evidence was obtained.
Report
Step 4: Design & Perform Responses to Risk Assessment
• Overall responses– Address risks of material
misstatements at the financial statement level
• Further audit procedures– Address risks of material
misstatement at the assertion level
46
24
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Step 5:Evaluate Audit Findings
Has sufficient appropriate audit evidence been accumulated?
Both determined
using professional judgment
Has audit risk related to all relevant assertions been reduced to “low” as a result of further audit procedures?
47
Documentation Templates
See Appendix E (p. 125)
for theRisk Assessment Toolkit
available at www.nocecpa.com
48
25
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Mini Case 3.3Gotbucks Springs Club HOASee case facts in handout & consider:1. What elements of the fraud triangle
are present here?2. Put yourself in Steely’s position. How
would you steal from GotbucksSprings Club HOA?
3. Are there internal control weaknesses present that management should be made aware of?
Text page 101
49
Section 3: Considering Fraud –Thinking Like a Crook
Objectives:1. Provide a brief background as to how
current standard evolved2. Discuss standards provisions & their
implication on current practice3. Provide implementation guidance for
application in audits applying GAAS4. To become familiar with changes
resulting from the Clarity Project
50
26
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Responsibilities of the Auditor
“An auditor conducting an audit in accordance with GAAS is responsible for obtaining
reasonable assurance that the financial statements as a whole are
free of material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.”
51
Responsibilities …Cont’d
“When considering the auditor’s responsibility to obtain reasonable
assurance that the financial statements are free from material
misstatement, there is no important distinction between
error & fraud.”
52
27
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
AICPA on Fraud…
“The auditor’s responsibility to detect fraud is very clear. The
auditor is responsible for providing reasonable assurance that the
financial statements are free of material fraud.”
53
Components ofClarified Standard
• Discussion of characteristics of fraud– Fraud triangle
• Responsibility for the prevention & detection of fraud
• Responsibility of the auditor
54
28
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Objectives of Auditor• Identify & assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud;
• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud, through designing & implementing appropriate responses; &
• Respond appropriately to fraud or suspected fraud identified during the audit.
55
Definitions
• Fraud - An intentional act by one or more individuals among management, those charged with governance, employees, or third parties, involving the use of deception that results in a misstatement in financial statements that are the subject of an audit.
• Fraud risk factors - Events or conditions that indicate an incentive or pressure to perpetrate fraud, provide an opportunity to commit fraud, or indicate attitudes or rationalizations to justify a fraudulent action.
56
29
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsProfessional Skepticism
In accordance with clarified SAS:auditor should maintain professional
skepticism throughout the audit, recognizing the possibility that a
material misstatement due to fraud could exist,
notwithstanding the auditor’s past experience of the honesty & integrity of the entity’s management & those charged with governance
57
RequirementsProfessional Skepticism• Unless the auditor has reason to
believe the contrary, the auditor may accept records & documents as genuine.
• If conditions identified during the audit cause the auditor to believe that a document may not be authentic or that terms in a document have been modified but not disclosed to the auditor, the auditor should investigate further.
58
30
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsProfessional Skepticism• When responses to inquiries of
management, those charged with governance, or others are inconsistent or otherwise unsatisfactory (for example, vague or implausible), the auditor should further investigate the inconsistencies or unsatisfactory responses.
59
RequirementsDiscussion Among Engagement Personnel
Consider fraud triangle Motive, opportunity, & rationalization
Risk of management override of controls
Consider circumstances that may be indicative of earnings management
Reinforce professional skepticism concepts
How might auditor respond to susceptibility of RMM due to fraud
60
31
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsDiscussion Among Engagement Personnel
• Brainstorming session• Consider internal controls• “What if?” scenarios
61
RequirementsRisk Assessment
• Fraud risk assessment is part of overall risk assessment
• AR = RMM x DR• RMM
– Error– Misappropriation of assets– Fraudulent financial reporting
• This includes an evaluation of related controls
62
32
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsRisk Assessment
• No significant changes from extant standards
• Subtle change in documentation “fraud risks” are now considered “significant risks”
• However, this subtle change has far reaching implications!
63
RequirementsDiscussions with Management & Others Within Entity
Management’s assessment of the risk that the financial statements may be misstated due to fraud
Management’s process for identifying, responding to, & monitoring risks of fraud
Management’s communications to those charged with governance
Management’s communications, if any, to employees regarding views on business practices & ethical behavior
Actual or suspected fraud
64
33
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsDiscussions with Management & Others Within Entity
Internal audit staffThose charged with governance
(unless they are same as management)
65
Inquiries of Management & Others About Fraud Risks
Others Employees with varying levels of
authority Lower level accounting staff Individuals not part of financial
reporting process
66
34
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Implementation GuidanceDiscussions with Management & Others Within Entity
In some entities, particularly smaller entities, the focus of management’s assessment may be on the risks of employee fraud or misappropriation of assets.
Inquiries of management & others within the entity are generally most effective when they involve an in-person discussion.
If questionnaires are used, they should be followed up with discussion
67
RequirementsUnusual or Unexpected Relationships
• Based on analytical procedures performed as part of risk assessment procedures, the auditor should evaluate whether unusual or unexpected relationships that have been identified indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
• To the extent not already included, the analytical procedures, & evaluation thereof, should include procedures relating to revenue accounts.
68
35
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsOther Information
• The auditor should consider whether other information obtained by the auditor indicates risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
69
RequirementsEvaluation of Fraud Risk Factors
• The auditor should evaluate whether the information obtained from the risk assessment procedures & related activities performed indicates that one or more fraud risk factors are present.
• Although fraud risk factors may not necessarily indicate the existence of fraud, they have often been present in circumstances in which frauds have occurred &, therefore, may indicate risks of material misstatement due to fraud.
70
36
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsIdentification & Assessment of Fraud Risk Factors
• The auditor should identify & assess the risks of material misstatement due to fraud at the:– financial statement level, – assertion level
• Presumption that revenue recognition is a fraud is continued
• The auditor should treat those assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud as significant risks– the auditor should obtain an understanding
of the entity’s related controls– evaluate whether controls have been
suitably designed & implemented to mitigate such fraud risks.
71
Evaluating Fraud Risks
Objective: Identifying risks that may result in a material misstatement due to fraud
• TYPE of risk• SIGNIFICANCE of risk• LIKELIHOOD of risk resulting in material
misstatement• PERVASIVENESS of risk
72
37
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Evaluating Fraud Risks
Assessing identified risks after taking evaluation of programs &
controls into account
73
RequirementsResponse to Assessed RMM Due to Fraud
Referenced to general risk assessment responses
Overall responses• Assignment & supervision of staff• Evaluation of selection & application of
accounting policies• Incorporate a level of unpredictability
Specific responses• Assertion level
74
38
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsAudit Procedures Responsive to Risk of Management Override of Controls
Test the appropriateness of journal entries obtain an understanding of the entity’s financial
reporting process & controls over journal entries & other adjustments, & the suitability of design & implementation of such controls;
make inquiries of individuals involved in the financial reporting process about inappropriate or unusual activity relating to the processing of journal entries & other adjustments;
consider fraud risk indicators, the nature & complexity of accounts, & entries processed outside the normal course of business;
select journal entries & other adjustments made at the end of a reporting period; &
consider the need to test journal entries & other adjustments throughout the period.
75
RequirementsAudit Procedures Responsive to Risk of Management Override of Controls
Review accounting estimates for biases & evaluate whether the circumstances producing the bias, if any, represent a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. In performing this review,
the auditor should evaluate whether the judgments & decisions made by management in making the accounting estimates included in the financial statements to indicate a possible bias
perform a retrospective review of management judgments & assumptions related to significant accounting estimates reflected in the financial statements of the prior year.
76
39
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsCommunication
Matter should be brought to attention of appropriate management level
Fraud involving senior management & fraud causing material misstatements should be reported directly to those charged with governance
Consider need to report to regulatory & enforcement authorities
Consider whether they represent conditions that represent internal control deficiencies that should be communicated
77
Communicating About Possible Fraud
In some cases, auditor may have a duty to expose possible fraud to outside parties: To comply with certain legal & regulatory
requirements To a successor auditor In response to a subpoena To a funding agency or other specified
agency in accordance with requirement for the audits of entities that receive governmental financial assistance
78
40
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
RequirementsDocumentation
Generally same as overall requirements for risk assessment Engagement team meeting Risks identified at financial statement &
assertion levelOverall & specific responses
Communications If revenue recognition not identified as a
fraud risk, how that presumption was overcome
79
Case Study 3.1 Clearview ManufacturingPlease familiarize yourself with the case
study facts in handoutDiscuss with othersReview fraud risk factors list Appendix AConsider fraud risks present at ClearviewRisks should identify the following
• TYPE of risk• SIGNIFICANCE of risk (material?)• LIKELIHOOD of risk resulting in material
misstatement• PERVASIVENESS of risk
80
41
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.
Copyri
ght 2
016-1
7
Mini Case 3.4ADL IncorporatedSee case facts in handout & consider:1. What elements of the fraud triangle
are present here?2. Put yourself in Buddy’s position. How
would you steal from ADL?3. Are there internal control weaknesses
present that management should be made aware of?
81
42
©2016. These materials are copyrighted and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part without permission of the author/CalCPA Education Foundation.