Fracking in the Foodshed

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    1/143

    Click to edit Master subtitle style

    Fracking in the FoodshedResearch & Development Of This Presentation:

    Martha Goodsell and Chris & Bob Applegate

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    2/143

    What is High VolumeHydraulic (Slickwater)

    Horizontal Fracturing -otherwise known as

    Fracking?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    3/143

    State of the Art:It can involve multiple laterals.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    4/143

    Technologically Advanced

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    5/143

    Industrial in Scale

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    6/143

    Fracking Transforms the Landscape

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    7/143

    The Shale Gas Extraction Process

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    8/143

    Beaver Run Reservoir,

    Western Pennsylvania

    Deciding Where to Site the Well

    Despite track record of spills and leaks.

    Step 1.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    9/143

    Erie, ColoradoFort Worth, Texas

    Mt. Pleasant TownshipWashington County , PA

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    10/143

    Aztec, New Mexico

    Lathrop, PA

    Charlston Township, PA

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    11/143

    Constructing Access Roads andGas Gathering Lines

    Step 2.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    12/143

    Clearing the Well Pad SiteStep 3.

    Wells require large,industrial pad sites.Depending on howmany well heads asite may contain, acompleted pad willrange from 5-15acres, but as manyas 40 acres mightbe disturbed in the

    constructionprocess.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    13/143

    Setting Up the Well PadStep 4.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    14/143

    Step 5. Trucking In Materials and Supplies

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    15/143

    All this heavy traffic

    destroys the roads

    Tioga County PennsylvaniaS.R. 3001 March 2010

    West Virginia

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    16/143

    FracNet: The PA tally over a two dayinspection blitz was 731 inspections, 824written warnings, 421 traffic citations,131 trucks taken off the road, and 14drivers placed out of service.

    Dust

    Exhaust

    CreatesUndesirable

    Conditions

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    17/143

    And Leads to Accidents.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    18/143

    Step 6. Storing the Chemicals

    Millions of pounds could be stored at one pad.Is this storage site located in a floodplain?

    Is there an evacuation plan?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    19/143

    Lowering the Drill BitStep 7.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    20/143

    Cool the Drill Bit

    Float theCuttingsOut of the Hole

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    21/143

    Circulating the Drilling MudStep 8.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    22/143

    Removing the Waste Drilling MudAnd Rock Cuttings From the Bore Hole

    How toxic are the cuttings?To what extent are they radioactive?

    Step 9.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    23/143

    Boring the Hole, Temporarily Exposing the Aquifer

    Drill stringer

    Bore hole

    Drinking water can go turbid

    Dimock, PA Clearville, PA

    Hickory , PA

    Chemicals can daylight

    Smells like motor oil!

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    24/143

    Sealing the Bore Hole

    Adding steel casinghelps seal hole fromaquifer.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    25/143

    Cement is forceddown through the

    well casing, out theannulus, and backup the bore hole.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    26/143

    methaneToxic fracking fluid

    Failed Cement Jobs:Migration Through Natural Fissures

    One quarter of all cement jobsfail immediately. Three quarters

    fail eventually.

    Cornell Engineering Professor and Rock

    Fracturing Specialist , Dr. Anthony Ingraffea

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    27/143

    Perforating or Perfing the WellStep 10.

    These perfs can also damagethe cement job allowingmethane and fluids to migrate inthe bore hole.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    28/143

    Acidizing the Well

    5,000 gallons of hydrochloric acid

    Halliburtons acidizing compound oftencontains Hydrogen Fluoride.

    Step 11.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    29/143

    Step 12. Fracking the Well

    The only step industry wants us to look at

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    30/143

    Capturing the Flowback WasteStep 13.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    31/143

    This waste, composed of brine AND drilling chemicals,is 5 times saltier than sea water!

    Trucking Waste Away to. . . ?Step 14.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    32/143

    Compressor Station, Pleasant Ridge, West Virginia

    Giant Diesel Engines

    Step 15. Pumping the Gas to Market

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    33/143

    Pipelines Carry the Gas to Market

    Millennium Pipeline

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    34/143

    What is a foodshed?And how will

    fracking affect it?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    35/143

    Click to edit Master subtitle style

    A foodshed outlines a particular area from whichfood is grown, processed, purchased andconsumed.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    36/143

    Agriculture andIndustrialized Gas Drilling

    NY was once able toproduce most of itsfood requirementsand may need to doso again if gasreaches $5/gallon.

    Source: The Urban Design Lab, The Earth Institute, Columbia University

    h i d h d f h i d

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    37/143

    The Organic Foodshed of the United States

    (Source: The Map Room)

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    38/143

    Gas Fields of the United States

    Notice the overlap of the Marcellus and the foodshed of the Northeast?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    39/143

    Mapping New Yorks Grass-based Agricultural Products

    Source: Mapping Potential Foodsheds in New York State

    Red = Buffalo foodshedGreen = Rochester foodshed

    Gold = Syracuse foodshedBlue = Albany foodshedYellow = Poughkeepsie foodshedPurple = NY City foodshed

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    40/143

    Drilling in the Foodshed:Impacts On Agriculture via Land, Water and Air

    Chappel Unit in Hopewell TownshipWashington County

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    41/143

    Two Types of Impacts to Farm Land

    Physical Impacts on farm land Fragmentation, Compaction, Erosion

    Chemical impacts on farm soils Chemical Contamination, Radiation, Heavy Metal

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    42/143

    Farmland Impacts

    Fragmentation

    Inaccessibility

    Explosions Openings for Invasive Species

    Compaction and Drainage

    Erosion and Sedimentation

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    43/143

    Jonah Field Pinedale, Wyoming

    FRAGMENTATION

    FRAGMENTATION

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    44/143

    Dish, Texas

    FRAGMENTATION

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    45/143

    Allegheny National Forest, PA

    FRAGMENTATION

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    46/143

    PA Farmland Fragmentation

    Farmers report fragmentation leaves some fields too small to farm.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    47/143

    Pipelines: Farm Field Fragmentation,Inaccessibility to Timber

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    48/143

    Explosions and

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    49/143

    Openings for Invasive Species

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    50/143

    Soil Compaction and Field Drainage

    Often, topsoil is not

    removed, set aside,and put back on topover pipe lines.

    Proper drainagetechniques are oftennot utilized.

    Areas overpipelines are oftenrendered useless foragriculture.

    Subsurface

    compaction leads tosurface saturation.

    Lack or aerationinhibits root growthand biologicalactivity.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    51/143

    Soil Erosion

    St t ff d

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    52/143

    SedimentationStorm water runoff andsedimentation increases totaldissolved solids (TDS) and totalsuspended solids (TSS) increeks and tributaries. When

    TDS or TSS increase theamount of light available tooxygen producing plantsdecreases. Eventually theplants die giving off bacteriawhich uses even more oxygen.

    As oxygen levels are depletedaquatic life dies.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    53/143

    Chesapeake Bay: Total Maximum Daily Load

    The big debate: Will it beconventional farming orfracking ??? Farmers mayhave to choose whichactivity to pursue.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    54/143

    SOIL CONTAMINATION

    Spills

    Leaks

    Flares

    Explosions

    Fires

    Experimental Disposal Methods

    Municipal sludge

    Soil Farming

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    55/143

    Spills

    AUGUST 13, 2009Ullom Road, Chartiers TownshipWashington County, Pa

    March 30, 2011Clinton County, PA

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    56/143

    Pipeline LeaksA satellite image shows light reflected off of

    plants leaves; plants that are stressed by

    gas leaks reflect light in different regionsof the spectrum, making it easier todetect leaks in underground methanepipelines.

    ULLOM ROAD PONDAPRIL 20, 2009Chartiers TownshipWashington County, Pa

    ImpoundmentLeaks

    Photo courtesy of Professor Mike Steven

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    57/143

    Flares

    Flaring affects soil fertilityby causing the soil tobecome more acidic andreducing the total organiccarbon, nitrate andphosphate content.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    58/143

    Explosions andFires

    W Di l E i

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    59/143

    Waste Disposal Experiments

    Misting in Wyoming

    Super Mistingin Pennsylvania

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    60/143

    Dust Control in West Virginia

    Wetzel, West VirginiaSeptember 27, 2010

    The DEC may grant a beneficial use determination forusing flowback water as a road de-icer.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    61/143

    Forcingwaste into

    deepinjectiondisposal

    wells.

    Earthquakeswarms canoccur.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    62/143

    Sewage Treatment Plants

    BRINE

    Radio

    Activity HazardousChemicals

    HeavyMetals

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    63/143

    Municipal Sludge

    CDC REPORT

    WARNS OFSLUDGEDANGER -MARCH 2000

    EPA cannot assure the publicthat current land application [of

    sewage sludge] practices areprotective of human health andthe environment. -- EPA

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    64/143

    Soil Farming

    Spreading untreated drill cuttings directly on farmland.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    65/143

    Will Farm Fields Become Brownfields?Buried wastewater and drill cutting pits are the future superfund sites of America.

    May 14, 2009 EnCana Site Garfield County, CO

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    66/143

    What are the Waste Components?

    Brine

    NORM and TNORMS

    Heavy Metals

    Of Particular Concern:

    BromideChloride

    Strontium

    Barium

    Fracking ChemicalsGlycol ether (2-BE)

    Source: Dan Volz at U. ofPittsburgh

    Do you want glow in the dark pickles showing up at

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    67/143

    Do you want glow in the dark pickles showing up atthe farmers market?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    68/143

    Alpha, Beta, Gamma Whats the Difference?

    Alpha radiation damages every 10th atom it comes intocontact with. Think of a big heavy bowling ball rolling acrossthe lawn. Alpha particles are absorbed by their surroundingsbut only at close range.

    Beta radiation- damages every 3,000th

    atom it comes intocontact with. Think of a golf ball rolling across the lawn.

    Gamma radiation- damages very few atoms it comes intocontact with. Think of the wind passing over the lawn. Veryfew blades of grass will be bent. Gamma particles pass

    through cells without damage, but radiation can be receivedeven though a very long way away.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    69/143

    RADIOACTIVITY: Irradiation vs. Contamination

    Irradiation is direct exposure to radioactive material directlyfrom the source.

    Contamination is exposure to radioactive material that lands onobjects such as the skin (or grass), is ingested through foodor water, or is inhaled in dust form.

    It is possible to miss contamination of radiation fields. Univ. of Maryland Environmental Safety

    Radiation at oil and gas facilities is not normally evaluatedduring site investigations and cleanup. EPA

    API (1989) and other studies suggest 1/3 of all producing U.S.oil and gas wells have elevated radiation EPA Office ofRadiation and Indoor Air

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    70/143

    SHALE RADIOACTIVITY Uranium 238

    Radium 226

    Radon 222

    Radium 222

    Radon 218LEAD

    Mercury 206

    http://www.periodictable.com/Isotopes/092.238/index.p.full.html

    LEAD

    Uranium 234

    Thorium 230

    Uranium238Uranium 234 is astable isotope

    SHALE RADIOACTIVITY Thorium 232

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    71/143

    SHALE RADIOACTIVITY Thorium 232

    http://periodictable.com/Isotopes/090.232/index.full.html

    Radium 228

    Radium 224

    Radon 220

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    72/143

    Radium, Radon and Health Risks

    The greatest health risk from radium isexposure to Radon EPA

    Health risks from exposure to radon are greaterthan all other routine, environmentalexposures to radioactive material combined. -

    - EPA

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    73/143

    Radon

    Radon can be found in air, soils and water.

    Is the second leading cause of lung cancer inthe U.S.

    Is naturally prevalent in much of the area.Levels are exacerbated at natural gas wellsites.

    No stable isotope (always radioactive givingoff alpha radiation).

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    74/143

    TNORM or TENORM

    Material containing radionuclides that are presentnaturally in rocks, soils, water, and minerals andwhose radioactivity has become concentratedand/or exposed to the accessible environment as a

    result of human activities.Radium precipitates out at surface: pipes, separators,

    storage tanks, gas lines, etc.

    API (1989) and other studies suggest 1/3 of allproducing U.S. oil and gas wells have elevatedradiation

    S f TNORM t G Fi ld

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    75/143

    Sources of TNORM at Gas Fields

    Pipe Scale

    Storage Tanks Contaminated Soils

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    76/143

    Heavy Metals in the Soils at Gas Sites

    Barium

    Cadmium

    Chromium Arsenic

    Lead

    Mercury

    Leafy greens, andmany other cropsuptake heavymetals and becomecontaminated. Ittakes four years of

    specific successionplantings, anddisposing of thecrops in a landfill, todraw some of theseheavy metals out ofagricultural soils.Some metals cannever be removed.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    77/143

    Bromide

    The spike in bromides in Western Pennsylvania's rivers andcreeks has put some public water suppliers into violation offederal safe drinking water standards.

    Bromide facilitates formation of brominated trihalomethanes,

    also known as THMs, when it is exposed to disinfectantprocesses in water treatment plants. THMs are volatileorganic liquid compounds.

    Studies show a link between ingestion of and exposure toTHMs and several types of cancer and birth defects.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    78/143

    Water Soluble Strontium

    A study published in theJournal of Petroleum Technologyfocusing on the concentrations of selected importantcontaminants in Pennsylvania from Marcellus Shale flowbackwater found that approximately 3,280 mg/L of strontiumor

    16,737 poundsare released every day into theMonongahela River.

    It is in those high concentrations that strontium posesa risk of bone cancer, cancer of the soft tissue near

    the bone, and leukemia.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    79/143

    Water Soluble Barium

    Barium compounds are used by the oil and gas industries tomake drilling mud.

    Barium reacts with almost all non-metals, forming poisonouscompounds.

    Exposure by inhaling dust, eating plants grown in contaminatedsoils, or drinking water that is polluted with barium. Skincontact may also occur.

    Large intake of water soluble barium may cause paralyses andin some cases even death. Small amounts of water-soluble

    barium may cause breathing difficulties, increased bloodpressures, heart rhythm changes, stomach irritation, muscleweakness, changes in nerve reflexes, swelling of brains andliver, kidney and heart damage.

    BIOACCUMULATION and

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    80/143

    BIOACCUMULATION andThe Food Chain

    Bioaccumulation is the process bywhich compounds accumulate inorganisms faster than they can bebroken down by the liver.

    Toxic chemicals, heavy metals andradioactive elements taken up byand accumulated by plants arepassed on to animals & humanswhen they eat them.

    Heavy metals accumulate in bones.Milk and meat products may

    contain heavy metals and radiation.

    Yet there is NO food safetyinspection in place for testingagricultural products producedin gas fields for thesecontaminants.

    WATER: Quantity and Quality

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    81/143

    WATER: Quantity and Quality

    CONSUMPTIVE WATER USAGE

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    82/143

    Each frack job uses onaverage 3.5 million

    gallons of water (someuse much more).

    Billions of gallons of

    clean water used inthe extraction processwill be rendered toxic

    and radioactive -perhaps permanently.

    CONSUMPTIVE WATER USAGE

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    83/143

    Will there be enough water for agriculture?

    The average dairy cow consumes 30gallons of water each day x 365days x 1,436,000 cows in New York.

    It takes 250,000 gallons of water togrow an acre of corn x 550,321 acresof corn.

    Grass land requires 20,250 gallons ofwater each week x 40 weeks x24,803,000 acres of grass.

    Source: USDA Census

    The typical NY farm needs thousands of gallons of watera day for livestock and irrigation.

    Flowback is advertised as produced water

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    84/143

    Flowback is advertised as produced water

    Liquid waste can look benign, but . . .

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    85/143

    it is not only toxic, its often flammable.

    Washington County, PAProduced water pit

    W W E h & N D

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    86/143

    Water, Water Everywhere & Not a Drop

    The greatest danger in gas drilling is waterpollution caused by spills, leaks, blowouts, andeven methane migration.

    Any contamination of ground water and aquifersis a threat to public health, wildlife andagriculture.

    Water quality is not protected as drilling activitiesare exempted from the Clean Water Act andthe Safe Water Drinking Act

    Can you imagine operating a farm using this

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    87/143

    y g p g gwater replacement system?

    This is NOT areplacement for this

    Water buffaloes in Spring Lake,

    Bradford County, PA

    Drinking Water Sources

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    88/143

    g

    Most upstate

    municipalities drawtheir water fromunderground aquifers,lakes, and streams.

    Most rural NYproperties depend onprivate water wells both shallow & deep for all of their personal &

    agricultural needs.

    Underground aquifers are as vulnerable as open surfaceaquifers. All water sources must be protected.

    N Y k W t B i

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    89/143

    New York Water Basins

    What if the water becomes unfit to drink?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    90/143

    The NYC watershed andDelaware River Basin

    combined - provides waterfor more than 15,600,000people - the largestunfiltered water source inthe world.

    The natural gas industry hasleased hundreds ofthousands of acres withinthe watershed and the riverbasin. That could mean50,000 gas wells in thecombined watershed area.

    Water Scarcity Facing 1/3 of US Counties

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    91/143

    y g /3

    T i Ch i l A Th t t O W t S l

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    92/143

    Toxic Chemicals: A Threat to Our Water Supply

    40,000 gallons of chemicals are used in onewell.

    93% of these chemicals have adverse health

    effects.

    60% are known carcinogens

    40% are known endocrine disruptors.

    Class of Additive Typical Use(s) System(s) Adversely Affected

    (at high exposure levels)Petroleum Distillate Products Corrosion inhibitors Gastro intestinal

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    93/143

    939

    3

    Kerosene

    Naptha

    Mineral spirits,

    Friction reducers

    Solvents

    Central nervous

    Skin - blistering or peeling

    Aromatic Hydrocarbons (BTEX)

    Benzene

    Toulene

    Ethylbenzene

    Xylene

    also napthalene and benzenederivatives

    Nervous system

    Liver

    Kidneys

    Blood forming tissues

    Leukemia

    Reproduction/ still births

    Respiratory system (lung tumors)Glycols

    Ethelyne glycol (antifreeze)

    Propylene glycol

    Crosslinkers

    Breakers

    Clay and iron controllers

    Scale inhibitors

    Low inherent toxicity

    Kidneys

    Reproductive system

    Glycol Ethers

    Monomethoxyethanol

    Monoethoxeyethanol

    Corrosion inhibitors

    Surfactants

    Friction reducers

    Male reproductive system

    Red blood cell formation

    Alcohols

    Ethanol

    Methanol

    (Pages 5-63 and 5-64 dSGEIS)

    Foaming agents

    Corrosion inhibitors

    Surfactants

    Iron and scale inhibitors

    Central nervous system

    Dangers listed by the DEC

    Class of Additive Typical Use(s) System Adversely Affected

    (at high exposure levels)Amides create polymers Nervous system

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    94/143

    949

    4

    Amides

    Acrylamide

    Formamide

    create polymers

    friction reducers

    scale inhibitors

    corrosion inhibitors

    Nervous system

    Cancer

    Female reproductive system

    Amines

    mono-,di-, and tri-ethanolamine

    corrosion inhibitors

    cross-linkers

    friction reducers

    iron and clay controllers

    liver

    kidneys

    Organic Acids

    formic acid

    acetic acid and citric acid

    corrosion and scale inhibitors

    friction reducers and surfactants

    corrosive to skin

    Microbiocides prevent bacterial production of sour gas

    maintain viscosity of additives

    respiratory system

    gastrointestinal tract

    Kidneys and liver

    nervous system

    Formaldehyde corrosion inhibitor

    scale inhibitor

    surfactant

    Severe pain, vomiting, coma and death

    nose and throat cancer

    1,4-dioxane surfactant kidney

    liver

    cancer

    Hydrochloric Acid Cleaning perforations and fractures Corrosive to skin

    Controversy

    Biodegrade ?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    95/143

    45 products withincompleteingredients listed

    40 compounds with unknowningredientsbecausetheyre mixtures

    Some chemicals not submitted to DEC (chapter 5DSGEIS)

    DECs dSGEIS (draft SupplementalGeneric Environmental ImpactStatement) says:

    And it flows down hill and down river

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    96/143

    Or willFaults and Seismicity in theAppalachin Basin of New York State

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    97/143

    eventually

    percolate upthrough theground!.

    Experts suggest that,

    over time, most of thetoxic undergroundwater will find its way tothe surface throughfissures, rusted pipesand cracked cement,and through theconduits of missing andunplugged water andgas wells.

    Appalachin Basin of New York StateSource: Jacobi, R.D., 2002, Tectonophysics, v. 353, p. 75-113.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    98/143

    Natural Gas DrillingActivities DecreaseAir Quality

    Sources of Oil and Gas Air Pollution

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    99/143

    Blowouts

    Condensate tanksConstruction activity

    Dehydrators

    Engines

    Flaring

    Fugitive emissions

    Pits

    VehiclesVenting

    Water pollution is adefinite possibility,

    but air pollution is a

    certainty.

    Y e t th e E P A s tu d y h a s e x c lu d e d a ir pollution in its current study of gas

    drilling.

    Of Particular Concern

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    100/143

    Of Particular Concern

    Ozone

    Fugitive Methane

    Hydrogen Sulfide

    Volatile Organic Compounds

    Noxious Chemicals

    Other Hydrocarbons

    Ozone (O3)Ozone is three oxygen atoms joinedtogether. Ozone is ready to react with

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    101/143

    Ozone (O3) together. Ozone is ready to react withwhatever it meets. It can cause lungdamage and illness. Ozone can alsocorrode building materials, statues andmonuments, and natural rock featuresin the landscape.

    Sublette County, Wyoming is a gas drilling zonewith a population of 2 people per square mile

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    102/143

    with a population of 2 people per square mile

    Yet is has an ozone levels equivalent to Los Angeles

    Ozone Negatively Impacts Plant Growth and Yields

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    103/143

    g

    According to EPA, even atrelatively low levels ofozone exposure, cropscan suffer a 20-40% lossin productivity.

    Ozone exposure makesplants less productive

    by decreasing theirphotosynthesis and bycausing leaves to die.Root development isinhibited by ozone. As aresult the hydrauliccapacity to provide thetranspiring shoots withwater is reduced.

    Plants, such as grapes, soybeans, alfalfa,clover, and grazing grasses suffer decreasingcrop yields from ozone.

    Fugitive Methane (CH4)

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    104/143

    From New York Times October 14, 2009

    Revkin and Krauss Franklin, Texas

    Same Image

    Optical Photography Infrared photography

    Invisible emissions of dangerous gasses

    Condensate tanks

    A major greenhouse gas concern

    Sources of methane emissions into the

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    105/143

    atmosphere

    Blowouts

    Also high levels ofhydrogen sulfide

    Venting

    Flaring

    Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    106/143

    Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)

    Hydrogen sulfide is most commonly obtainedby its separation from sour gas, which isnatural gas with high content of H2S. It is acolorless, flammable gas that is verypoisonous.

    Volatile Organic Compounds

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    107/143

    Volatile Organic Compounds

    Benzene

    Toluene

    Ethylbenzene

    Xylenes

    Acetone

    Carbon Disulfide

    Methyl Ethyl Ketone

    Noxious chemicals

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    108/143

    Noxious chemicals

    from diesel driventrucks andcompressors canhave serious health

    consequences onpeople, animals andplants. For humansthis includes asthma,stroke, cardiovascular disease andirritable boweldisorders. Aruba Petroleum (Photo: Tim Ruggiero)

    Toxic Plumes: Imagine a foggy August morning

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    109/143

    Natural gas sometimes contains a significant amountof ethane, propane, butane, and pentane heavier

    hydrocarbons removed prior to use as a consumer fuel aswell as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, helium and hydrogensulfide. All of the above with the exception of ethane,nitrogen, and helium are denser than air. All are colorless

    and vary greatly in their properties, including toxicity.

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    110/143

    DUST, LIGHT AND NOISE POLLUTION

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    111/143

    DUST, LIGHT AND NOISE POLLUTION

    Source: Bobs Blog

    Sound wall

    Rock DustParticulate cloud near frac mixer

    You expect our animals to eat the grass when itsd i h d ? D i f

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    112/143

    covered with dust? Dairy farmer

    Bradford County, PAPhoto Sue Heavenrich

    Silicosis

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    113/143

    Silicosis

    Silicosis makes an individual more susceptible to TB.

    Because of their susceptibility, cattle and farmed cervids(deer and elk) are routinely tested for TB.

    Silicosis is causedby exposure to

    respirablecrystalline silicadust.

    Effects include lungcancer,

    Bronchitis/ChronicObstructivePulmonary Disorder,Scleroderma andpossible RenalDisease.

    Light Pollution and Pollinators

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    114/143

    Research on insects, turtles,

    birds, fish, reptiles, and otherwildlife species shows that lightpollution can alter behaviors,foraging areas, and breedingcycles.

    Light Pollution and Trees

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    115/143

    Prolonged exposure to artificial

    light prevents many trees fromadjusting to seasonal variations.

    Compressor

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    116/143

    CompressorStation Noise

    Can happy cows live heretoo or only in California?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    117/143

    Noise affects hatchability rates of

    birds and poultry, smallruminant metabolism, andhuman endocrine systems.Studies indicate that it alsoincreases blood pressure and

    stress levels in all animals.

    Impacts on Livestock

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    118/143

    At least 40% of fracking chemicals are endocrine disruptorsand can cause falling reproductive rates, stillbirths, andbirth defects.

    Small spills can have huge effects on livestock, who oftendrink from surface water sources and are attracted to thesalty taste.

    There are growing, documented reports of livestock illnessand death from acute toxicity.

    Livestock Poisoning from Oil Field Drilling Fluids, Muds and Additives, appeared inthe journal Veterinary & Human Toxicology in 1991. It examined seven instances where oiland gas wells had poisoned and/or killed livestock. In one such case, green liquid was

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    119/143

    A surface spill at .5% dilution can dothis?

    Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality:Cato Parish - spilled fluid killed 17 cows.

    Tioga County PA- May 201028 Cows quarantined after drilling fluid

    (heavily laced with strontium) leak.

    and gas wells had poisoned and/or killed livestock. In one such case, green liquid wasfound leaking from a tank near a gas well site. The studys authors found 13 dead cows,whose postmortem blood was chocolate-brown in color. Poisoning cases involving

    carbon disulfide, turpentine, toluene, xylene, ethylene, and complex solvent mixturesare frequently encountered, the study concluded.

    Food Safety?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    120/143

    Most food is not adequately

    inspected for chemicalcontamination.

    There is no system in placeto test affected crops, meat,

    or dairy, even whenexposure by frackingchemicals is suspected.

    The National Residue

    Program, which monitorsknown chemical residues, ismissing key heavy metals &chemicals.

    Since key information ismissing on what chemicals

    are used in gas production,its impossible to monitortheir presence in the food

    chain.

    A Fukushima Analogy?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    121/143

    Japanese Imports Banned Due to Radiation Concerns

    We know radiation affects agriculture and

    fisheries, and travels through the foodchain.

    With radiation you must worry about your totaldose over a lifetime, wherever it may come from.

    We dont knowthe implicationsfrom long termlow levelradiation

    exposure to us,our livestock orour foodsources.

    Radioactive feral hogs in Europe Fish warnings on our rivers

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    122/143

    Will our cattle be next?

    What are the cumulative impacts onagriculture plants and animals?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    123/143

    agriculture, plants, and animals?

    Where are the studies?

    What will happen to our food? What

    will happen to our farms?

    Impacts to New York Agriculture

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    124/143

    NY ranks in the top 5 states for production of dairy, cherries, apples, cabbage,potatoes, onions and maple syrup.

    The counties covering the Marcellus Shale formation include an agriculturalregion called the plateau country which is known for its production of dairy,beef, vegetables, wine, potatoes, and many other foods.

    New York has numerous award-winning vineyards and breweries.

    The number of NOFA-NY certified organic farms has increased steadily in the lastdecade with a concentration of organic farms in the Shale Gas region.

    Most upstate farms are small, compared to farms in other regions, yet are themost threatened from HVHHF.

    Good For The Local Economy?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    125/143

    Other Impacts

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    126/143

    Property values Insurance rates

    Heavy traffic congestion (between 5850 and 8905truck trips per pad)

    State forests and outdoor recreation

    Health impacts Security and safety

    Social services and housing

    12 Unintended Consequences

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    127/143

    q

    Shortages of sawdust and bedding material forfarm use.

    Shortages of gravel, concrete and other suppliesfor agricultural use.

    Difficulties in finding open repair shops or on-callmechanics for agricultural equipment as manytechnicians are working for or catering to the gascompanies first.

    Difficulties in finding rendering options fordeceased animals. Who wants to take a potentiallycontaminated animal?

    Unintended Consequences Continued

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    128/143

    Shortages of milk truck drivers are raisingthe cost paid by farmers to haul milk to themarket.

    Road congestion & deterioration is causingdifficulties for farm vehicles.

    In addition to being drilled, some farms arebeing mined for gravel. On other farms

    water is being hauled away or pumped off.

    Unintended Consequences Continued

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    129/143

    Bat and bird habitat is being destroyedresulting in higher insect populations. Suchpests may lead to livestock stress, disease

    and even death. Coyote populations are likely to increase

    threatening sheep, goat, deer and young

    calves.

    Unintended Consequences Continued

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    130/143

    Taxpayer supported farmland protection programsmay allow for drilling. Land trusts and open spaceprojects wishing to preserve and promoteagriculture may not be able to prohibit industrialized

    drilling. Consumers may become wary of agricultural

    products from frackland.

    Farmers may be left liable for contamination or

    pollution as a result of their leases. Others may beheld financially responsible under a mechanicslien.

    First the Boom

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    131/143

    1311

    31

    Then the bustD illi d d

    Tim and Christine RuggieroDenton, Texas

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    132/143

    Unknown gasbubbles

    Drilling mud spread onproperty.

    Condensate tanks.

    Original 2010 assessment:$257,330. Current 2011Assessment: $75,240.

    Waste fluid pond

    OR THE CORPORATE TAKEOVER!

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    133/143

    Recent newspaper headlinesCourt allows condemnation of 9,100 acres in Kansas

    (issue: underground gas storage site leak)

    "Cattle vs. Conoco: How Gas Fields Are Crowding OutNew Mexico Ranchers (issue: living conditionsand affected livestock)

    Eminent Domain Power Granted to Private PipelineCompanies

    How Did NY Get Sold Down The River?

    A P f t St

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    134/143

    A Perfect Storm

    New technology +lax regulations = profits

    Lack of oversight -Federal, state, and local

    Nearby energy markets

    Stealth leasing

    Ignorance by design

    Appalachia

    Milk pricing

    Why are we talking about agriculture withouttalking about fracking?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    135/143

    talking about fracking?

    Cuomo supports NYS Council on Food PolicyQuinn, Stringer and other potential 2013 candidates explore food policy as a

    recipe for success

    NYSAC Blue Ribbon Task Force on the Future of Farming in New York State

    Agriculture is Economic Development

    New Food System Principles Emphasize Health

    Benefits

    ANALYZING REGIONAL FOODSHEDS AND LOCAL FOOD: THE ROLE

    OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND USE LAW AND POLICY

    Why are we talking about drilling impactswithout talking about agriculture?

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    136/143

    Farming in the Northeast is a constant struggle.

    Most farm families need off-farm jobs to make ends meet & pay for health insurance.

    Gas bonuses & royalties can feel like winning the lottery.

    Farming involves a lot of hoping for the best and the safety of gas drilling is no exception.

    Buyers are increasingly wary of leased & developed land and mortgages can be hard to secure.

    In Pennsylvania, its estimated that 25% of farmers with gas wells have abandoned farming.

    Will farmers be stuck with useless farmland?

    without talking about agriculture?

    THE TRADE OFF

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    137/143

    Government is forcing farmers into a choice manydon't want to make. What is needed is anagricultural policy that helps farmers receive a fairprice for their products. An energy policy thatprovides some cash at the expense of the health of

    the farm families, the safety and marketability of thefood they produce, and the profitability of theirfarms is no substitute for good farm policy. We mustdo better than to put our water, air and soil, ourfood supply, the health of individuals and

    communities and the well-being of futuregenerations at risk.

    Ask Your Doctor If Gas DrillingIs Right For You!

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    138/143

    g WARNING: gas drilling near your home may put you at risk for possible exposure to

    carcinogens, neurotoxins, and endocrine disruptors by inhalation, ingestion, and absorption;elevated ground level ozone and air pollution in gas production areas due to toxic fumes anddiesel exhaust; disease caused by chemicals, hydrocarbons, radium, and heavy metals in yourdrinking water; adrenal gland dysfunction from the low frequency noise of compressorstations; and potential for explosion due to methane accumulation in your home.

    KEEP AWAY FROM CHILDREN, PREGNANT WOMEN, THE ELDERLY AND PETS. Symptoms can

    include, but are not limited to, headaches, nose bleeds, eye and skin damage, gastrointestinalproblems, respiratory problems, dizziness, and confusion.

    Physicians report that methane, Ethylbenzene, m,p-Xylene, Hexane, 2 Methylpentane, and 3-Methylpentane have been detected in their patients blood.

    Related serious side effects in gas extraction, processing, and production areas can beexpected, including permanent neurological damage, cancer, brain damage, and endocrinesystem disruption.

    For a comprehensive review of Public Health EffectsTEDX The Endocrine Disruption Exchange

    BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY ???Ommegang believes that opposing development of hydrofracking is critical to the interests of our

    community, our people and our business. We are proud of our accomplishment in building a thriving,

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    139/143

    community, our people and our business. We are proud of our accomplishment in building a thriving,sustainable and environmentally conscious business in upstate New York. We are deeply concerned at thethreat posed by development of drilling in the region and the risk to the purity of the water on which wedepend, and which is a key reason we are located here. We are a company that enjoys a national

    reputation for super-premium quality beers produced in upstate New York and we hope that the stateand local regulators attach value to what we do for the region in terms of employment and ourrepresentation of upstate New York in restaurants and grocery stores across the nation. We do not wantour business future, our employees futures and our communities futures damaged or destroyed bywater pollution, or compromised by the industrialization associated with hydrofracking for shale gas.

    -- Simon Thorpe, President/CEO of Brewery Ommegang, Cooperstown, New York

    I want to alert you to a less obvious effect that hydrofracking will have on us and on the NYS farms whoseproducts we make a great effort to buy. We are very responsive to the needs of our shoppers. If

    hydrofracking is allowed to go forward our shoppers are certain to be asking us if the fruits, vegetables,dairy products, eggs and meats from New York State are produced in areas where hydrofracking is takingplace. It will not take many inquiries for us to start researching alternatives to NYS products.

    -- Joe Holtz, General Manager of Park Slope Food Coop Inc, Brooklyn, New York

    At the Co-op, we work hard to support our Western New York farms. Our business depends on theirsurvival. But if our customers tell us to source clean natural foods from non-hydrofracking regions, weand other grocers will shift our purchasing dollars elsewhere. Hydrofracking may create a few jobs in the

    energy industry, but it will put at risk our Co-op and all of local partners we do business with.-- Tim Bartlett, General Manager of Lexington Co-operative Market, Buffalo, New York

    What Not To Do

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    140/143

    If you are now planning to avoid food grown ingas drilling areas who could blame you?

    But what will that accomplish?

    Youll be driving another nail into thesustainability of American agriculture.

    Where will your food come fromwhen all the farms are gone?

    What You Can Do

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    141/143

    Get involved on a local, regional & national level.Support local grassroots organizations. If you donthave time to volunteer then consider making afinancial contribution.

    Get to know your local farmer and his/her needs.Support sustainable farming practices and policies.Demand Farm Bill reforms.

    Contact your local representatives. Demandaccountability. Push local zoning, and otherprotective municipal laws. Show up at meetings. Callstate and federal representatives often.

    Dont Take Our Word For It

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    142/143

    Sources quoted, including scientific studies, can befound at:

    https://acrobat.com/app.html#d=cx0ZyEPSWPh9WxIjwDJbTA

    Many thanks to those who shared their photos, experience,

    knowledge, professional talents and other resources; especiallythe folks at www.Marcellus-Shale.US.

    Contact Us

  • 7/29/2019 Fracking in the Foodshed

    143/143

    Martha [email protected]

    Christine and Bob Applegate

    [email protected]