7
Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1. Assessment 2. Plan development 3. Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1. Desired conditions 2. Objectives 3. Management standards and guidelines 4. Suitability of land for various activities 5. Monitoring program – questions and associated indicators Wilderness Character: Development of desired condition including area’s distinctive role Monitoring program

Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Forest Service Land Management Planning

Three-step process1. Assessment2. Plan development3. MonitoringRequired Land Management Plan components: 1. Desired conditions2. Objectives3. Management standards and

guidelines4. Suitability of land for various

activities5. Monitoring program – questions

and associated indicators

The plan must also identify the area’s distinctive roles and contributions within the broader landscape

Wilderness Character:• Development of

desired condition including area’s distinctive role

• Monitoring program

Page 2: Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Purpose and NeedIs Action Necessary? (poll question #1)

Wildland-urban interface -- 1,580 private lots within ½ mile of boundary; -- 42% of area within ¼ mile of residents could produce 4’ flame lengths

Suppression history -- 100% suppression, average 4 fires/year-- Suppression impacts

Page 3: Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Proposed Action• 11,112 acres of

prescribed burning• 19 units• Implementation over 5-

10 years• 5.8 miles of fire line

Issue: Proposed treatment will impair the character of wilderness with no clear benefit to wilderness values.

Alternative • 6,900 acres of

prescribed burning• 11 units• Implementation over 5-

10 years• 2.8 miles of fire line

Poll Question #2

Page 4: Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Effect on Untrammeled Quality

# of actions to ignite fire# of actions to suppress fireNo Action0 actions to ignite fire100% suppression actions continue

Proposed Action1 action per year for 5-10 years to ignite fire45% suppression actions over time

Alternative1 action per year for 5-10 years to ignite fire50% suppression actions over time

Page 5: Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Effect on Natural QualityThe hidden consequences of suppressing fire

Acres actually burned versus what might have burned under different weather scenarios

4,700 actual acres burned (1970-2011)119,000 acres estimated burned for 70th percentile burning index

No Action5,000 acres burned over 50 years

Proposed Action65,000 acres burned over 50 acres

Alternative60,000 acres burned over 50 acres

Page 6: Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Effect on Opportunities for Solitude or Primitive and Unconfined Recreation

Poll question #3

# of days fire crews are present Duration of temporary closures

No Action0 days of fire crew presenceNo temporary closures

Proposed action and Alternative20 days of presence~2 week temporary closure

Page 7: Forest Service Land Management Planning Three-step process 1.Assessment 2.Plan development 3.Monitoring Required Land Management Plan components: 1.Desired

Findings - Effect on Wilderness Character

Untrammeled: Short-term decline; Long-term improvementNatural: Short-term stable; Long-term improvementUndeveloped: Stable in short-term and long-term Solitude: Short-term decline; Long-term stable

Overall: Temporary decline in wilderness character with potential for lasting improvement in long-term

Monitoring# of management actions takenChange in % fires suppressedChange in suppression tactics