MOLOPO AUSTRALIA LIMITEDMOLOPO AUSTRALIA LIMITED

June 2008

An Australian Gas CompanyAn Australian Gas Company

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CORPORATE PROFILECORPORATE PROFILE

Market Capitalisation: $320mCash Reserves: $28m (Mar 2008)Debt Free

Board & ManagementBoard & Management::

Donald Beard – Chairman

Stephen Mitchell – Managing Director

Ian Gorman - Executive Director & COO

Ric Sotelo - CFO & Company Secretary

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

OPERATIONAL STRATEGY/KEY ASSETSOPERATIONAL STRATEGY/KEY ASSETS

Molopo’s CBM growth strategy has been to build a diversified portfolio of petroleum assets at the appraisal or advanced exploration stage. This has thus far led to a portfolio that now includes 7 areas of interest:

1. Bowen Basin – Queensland2. Gloucester Basin – NSW3. Quebec – Canada4. Evander and Virginia – South Africa5. Liulin CBM Project – China6. Clarence Moreton Basin – NSW7. Mason County – USA

Most of these projects are targeting gas resources of over 1000PJ

Molopo is now set to embark upon a strategy to develop this portfolio into assets that can generate long-term cash flow and shareholder value

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Project Portfolio OverviewProject Portfolio Overview

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

MOLOPOMOLOPO’’S FOCUS AREAS S FOCUS AREAS

Quebec Shale/Conventional gas

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

QUEENSLANDBowen Basin - Molopo has 50% of ATP564P, PL94 (part), PLA210 and ATP602P

NEW SOUTH WALESGloucester Basin – Molopo has a 30% interest in PEL285

Clarence Moreton Basin - Molopo has a 100% interest in PEL 426 and a 49% interest in PEL 13.

Metgasco earning a 50% interest in PEL426

Metgasco is also earning 75% of the CBM rights and 50% of the conventional rights in PEL13

AUSTRALIAN PETROLEUM INTERESTSAUSTRALIAN PETROLEUM INTERESTSMOLOPO’S AUSTRALIAN PETROLEUM PERMITS

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CBM IN QLD - Bowen Basin Permits

Molopo’s share of 2P Reserves at Mungi and Harcourt is 43PJ, 3P reserves are 108PJ

Gas-in-place in QLD permits is estimated at over 1.5TCF

2P Reserves defined to date in 3 prospects.

Interest holders are Molopo (50%), Anglo (25.5%) and Mitsui (24.5%) .

QUEENSLAND PERMITS & PROSPECTS

Molopo’s Queensland Interests

>30050310ATP602P

>500501,650ATP564P

>50050178PLA210A

3505050PL94 (north)

GIIP(Bscf)

Interest(%)

Area(km2)

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CBM IN QLD - The Mungi Field

Total 2P reserves 61PJ – 3P 151PJ

Gas-in-place over 300PJ

10 wells in production with scope for over 100 laterals

Closest production to Gladstone

Three sole risk development wells underway

Performance of new lateral wells is critical

WELL LOCATIONS AT THE MUNGI GAS FIELD

• Mungi 27

• Mungi 1• Mungi 10

• Mungi 28

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CBM IN QLD - The Harcourt/Bindaree Field

Molopo has a 50% interest in the Harcourt/Bindaree Field in PLA210

Combined area is 178km2 – many times larger than Mungi

Current 2P reserves are 26PJ – 3P reserves are 66PJ – under review

4 Production wells tested to date

Fifth well to be completed

PL Application made. Possible tie in to Mungi processing facilities.

HARCOURT & BINDAREE PROJECT AREA

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CBM IN QLD CBM IN QLD -- The Timmy ProspectThe Timmy Prospect

Molopo has a 50% interest in ATP602P, which adjoins ATP564P

The Timmy Prospect is 71 km2 and is estimated to contain over 300PJ of recoverable gas

An old Conoco well using an outdated stimulation technique flowed gas at 150,000cf/day

Molopo and partners are currently testing a horizontal production well.

Exciting project – likely to have higher permeability than Mungi/Harcourt.

TIMMY PROSPECT

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CBM IN QLD - Lilyvale And Oak Park Prospect

The Lilyvale and Oak Park Prospects in ATP564P cover a combined area of 173 km2

Current reserves of 247PJ – under review

Three cored wells drilled by Origin and Molopo demonstrated favorable characteristics for CBM

Represents secondary target at present due to location

ATP564P NORTH WESTERN PROSPECT

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Very thick coal sequence (30 to 60 metres) with high permeability generally greater than 20md at Stratford Prospect

Measured gas contents at greater than 12m3/t up to 25m3/t.

15 chip and core exploration holes define part of basin

In total approximately 200km2 of coal bearing strata. JV GIIP estimates of ~ 2.5TCF.

CBM IN NSW - Gloucester Basin Summary PEL 285 – STRATFORD PROSPECT

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Very encouraging initial production results from first 3 wells producing in excess of 1,000,000cf/d each

3 new production wells and up to 13 CBM coreholes are planned to further delineate reserves - drilling underway

Initial Reserve Certification by NSAI:1P : 15 BCF2P : 170 BCF3P : 359 BCFContingent Resource : 167 BCFTotal Recoverable Potential : 525 BCF (RF33%)GIIP : 1.6 TCF

CBM IN NSW - Gloucester Basin Summary

Figure 5: Fraccing Operations

Figure 6: Seismic Operations

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CBM IN NSW PEL 13 & 426

Combined area of ~4,650km2

Prospective for CBM and conventional gas

Metgasco is earning 50% of PEL426 by financing new 2D seismic and 1 CBM well

Metgasco also earning an interest in PEL 13 (50% of conventional and 75% of CBM). First cored hole had thick gassy coal

21 Petroleum wells drilled to date. Best results have been:

• Hogarth 2 & Pickabooba – Both produced over 450mcf/d

CLARENCE MORETON BASIN

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

International ProjectsInternational Projects

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

GAS IN CANADA GAS IN CANADA -- QuebecQuebecCANADA – SHALE GAS PROJECT

Molopo has 100% (80% NRI) in 1,857,000 acres in Quebec

Shale gas and conventional targets

Primary objective is the Lorraine/Utica shales

Evidence of gas in shale from old wells with unstimulated flows recorded

Well positioned with respect to infrastructure and high priced east coast gas markets

Large companies in the region (Forest Oil, Talisman)

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

QUEBECQUEBEC

Major attributes of the play:

The presence of regionally extensive, thick gassy shales with multi TCF gas in place potential

Impressive unstimulated gas production from shales in old wells

Pipeline access to one of the highest price gas markets in the world (NE USA)

Early success by Forest Oil in shales

Multiple playtypes (other than shale gas) also presentFor

per

sona

l use

onl

y

QUEBEC SHALE GAS QUEBEC SHALE GAS –– UNSTIMULATED DST RESULTSUNSTIMULATED DST RESULTS

Utica & Lorraine Shales

-12000

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

1 10 100 1000 10000

Flow-rate (Mscf/d)

Dep

th (f

t)

LorraineUticaF

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly

Becancour-8Junex partner

Drilled 2006-07Frac stim 2007

St Francois du Lac-1Gastem partner

Drilled summer 2007Frac stim Dec 2007

Forest April 2008 announcement

4.1 TCF net resource potential in Junex & Gastem farmin acreage

2 vertical wells fracstimulated with test rates up to 1,000 Msf/d

Forest next stepTwin the vertical well locations in 2008 with 3 horizontal wells

2000’ laterals, 4 stage fracper lateral

FOREST OIL FOREST OIL -- Announced ResultsAnnounced Results

Molopo Canada

Forest Oil

St Louis de RichelieuGastem partner

Drilled summer 2007

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

MOLOPO QUEBEC 1.857M ACRESMOLOPO QUEBEC 1.857M ACRES

Junex

Gastem

Talisman

Questerre

Squatex

Altai

Mundiregina

Intragaz

Petrolympia

Southern Blocks 975,000 acres

Gas pipeline to USA

Junex

Talisman

Squatex

Mundiregina

Intragaz

Northern Blocks 882,000 acres

30km

Molopo Canada

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

PLAY TYPESPLAY TYPES

UnconventionalUnconventionalBiogenic Utica/Lorraine fractured Shale (Analogue - Michigan Basin Antrim Shale, over 900 gas wells)

Thermogenic Utica/Lorraine Fractured Shale (Analogue – Barnett Shale)

ConventionalConventionalTrenton/Black River hydrothermal dolomite, (Analogue - Indiana, Ohio and Michigan oil, New York gas)

Beekmantown carbonate (Analogue -Quebec’s Saint-Flavien gas field)

Potsdam Sandstone (Analogue – JunexBruyeres gas field)

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

NWNW--SE SEISMIC SECTIONSE SEISMIC SECTION

Saint-FlavienGas Field

Logan’s Line

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Utica Shalezero edge

Foulon Fault

Yamaska Fault

Logan’s Line

A163 Shell Wickham6000’ of Melbourne Slate

resting on Trenton fm, TOC<0.1, Ro>6

A201 SEE Milton7m of surficial deposits on

334m of arkose interbeddedwith red & green slate TD

342m

Ophiolite(metamorphosed ultrabasic lavas)

A185 Soquip DomeDST 7,570-7,790’ Lorraine

flowed 50Mscf/d unstimulated

A166TOC 1.73;

Ro 4

A152Ro 3.7-4.2

Depth (ft)

DEPTH TO BASE UTICA SHALE (TOP TRENTON) & MAJOR FAULTSDEPTH TO BASE UTICA SHALE (TOP TRENTON) & MAJOR FAULTS

A187 SoquipLorraine/Utica

good gas shows

A194 ShellLorraine

good gas shows

Structural complexity

increasing to the SE toward Appalachians

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

LorraineMax 8300’

UticaMax 2500’

Thickness (ft)

Thickness(ft)

SHALE THICKNESS FROM WELL CONTROL USING BOUNDING FAULTSSHALE THICKNESS FROM WELL CONTROL USING BOUNDING FAULTS

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Richelieu East2006PG835; 14,000ac

Bedford2006PG836, 2006PG838;

23,000ac

pipeline

Richelieu West2006PG832, 833, 834; 21,000ac

Thermogenic Shale Fairway East of Logan’s Line with good well control

Lyster2006PG910-916; 2006PG818

163,000ac

Drummondville1 large structural Lead

Bedford2 structural Leads

50kmCanada

USA

Richelieu West2006PG832, 833, 834; 90,000ac

Thermogenic* Shale Fairway West of Logan’s Line

Fractured Biogenic Shale Fairway (700-2400’)

SeawaySeveral structural

Leads

Quebec 2006PG831; 46,000ac

Richelieu West2 structural Leads

FOCUS AREASFOCUS AREAS

Logan’s Line

Thermogenic Shale Fairway East of Logan’s Line with poor well control

TBR/Beekmantown/Potsdam conventional plays

* All thermogenic fairways depth to base Utica >2400’

Quebec2 structural Leads

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

SHALE GAS IN CANADA SHALE GAS IN CANADA –– Comparison of Shale Rock PropertiesComparison of Shale Rock Properties

Some analysts are comparing the Quebec shale play to the Barnett shales

Barnett shales have generated major reserves in the US (~ 30 TCF) via thousands of wells

Source: Forest Oil April 2008 Presentation

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

PIPELINESPIPELINES

Montreal

Quebec City

TranscanadaPipeline

GazMetro Pipeline

TQM Pipeline

Vermont USANew York USA

New Hampshire

USA

Major gas pipeline is owned jointly by Trans Canada Pipeline Co.

The pipeline currently has about 350mmcf/day extra capacity

Great flexibility regarding access to the transmission and distribution system

Gas can be sold to GazMetro or they will transport the gas to a purchaser

Québec gas price likely to be NYMEX plus ~$1.00/mcf. F

or p

erso

nal u

se o

nly

2008 WORK PROGRAMME2008 WORK PROGRAMME

Five areas with conventional leads identified which upon drilling will test all the currently recognised play types and also allow assessment of overlying shales

Currently purchasing available seismic, assessing reprocessing/acquisition needs and commencing interpretation of Leads

Currently interpreting aeromagnetic survey recorded by Amque

Continuing gas sampling/isotope and conventional core studies

Preparing to shoot new seismic and commence drilling early 2009

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

GAS IN SOUTH AFRICAGAS IN SOUTH AFRICA

MPO has a 100% interest in two South African projects

Free State Exploration Right is ~ 500,000 acres

Mpumalanga Province Exploration Right is ~ 150,000 acres

Both areas have a history of gas emissions from mineral exploration

Over 70 gas emitting boreholes recently identified

Over 2000 soil gas samples taken

Nine wells producing a combined total of 1,000,000cf/d

Possible that significant carbon credits will be available.

SOUTH AFRICAN APPLICATIONS

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

GAS IN SOUTH AFRICAGAS IN SOUTH AFRICA

Figure 7: Soilgas Sampling

Figure 9: New “blowers”

Figure 8: Oil & Gas Infrastructure

Figure 10: Old “blowers”

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

GAS IN SOUTH AFRICA – Pilot Performance

Production stable

Wells produced since 1980’s

9 Wells in pilot group

Dataset aimed to support reserves certification

Total South Africa Production

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

2-N

ov7-

Nov

12-N

ov17

-Nov

22-N

ov27

-Nov

2-D

ec7-

Dec

12-D

ec17

-Dec

22-D

ec27

-Dec

1-Ja

n6-

Jan

11-J

an16

-Jan

21-J

an26

-Jan

31-J

an5-

Feb

10-F

eb15

-Feb

20-F

eb25

-Feb

1-M

ar6-

Mar

11-M

ar16

-Mar

21-M

ar26

-Mar

31-M

ar5-

Apr

10-A

pr15

-Apr

20-A

pr25

-Apr

30-A

pr5-

May

10-M

ay15

-May

20-M

ay25

-May

Scf

/day

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

CBM IN CHINA CBM IN CHINA -- LiulinLiulin Contract AreaContract AreaThick coals (13m), high gas contents (14m3/t) and high permeability (up to 30 md) make Liulin an attractive project Resource estimate lifted from 800bcf to 1.2TCF

Molopo has 40% (net 20%). Partner is Fortune Oil – LSE company specialising in energy in China Two new production test wells recently completed and on testAdditional production and cored wells plannedMolopo is encouraging partner to drill laterals

P.R. CHINA – LIULIN PROSPECT

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

SHALE GAS IN THE USA SHALE GAS IN THE USA –– West Virginia West Virginia

Molopo has 50% of ~5,700 acres in a gas project in the US

Gassy acreage – already 37 wells producing gas from shale by others in Mason County

Close to infrastructure

Strong partner.

Significant shale activity by majors in the region (Cabot)

US endeavours under review

MASON COUNTY WEST VIRGINIA

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

2008 PROGRAMME 2008 PROGRAMME & OBJECTIVES & OBJECTIVES

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

Data assessment, prioritise targetsCANADA – Quebec

Production test existing wells, 3 new cored holes, lateral appraisal well(s), extend Production Sharing Contract

CHINA

PROJECTS:MUNGI (QLD) 3+ new production wells, increased production, sales and reserves

New sales contract

GLOUCESTER (NSW) 5 well production pilot, 2 cored holes, established reserves

HARCOURT (QLD) 1 new production test well, confirm and expand reserves

TIMMY (QLD) Complete production test, establish initial reserves

SOUTH AFRICA Feasibility study on developing “blowers”, soilgas testing, mapping, development decision, sales contract

USA (WV) 1 production test well (shale)

CLARENCE MORETON (NSW) Seismic reprocessing, new seismic, 1 cored CBM well

2008 INDICATIVE PROJECT TARGETS2008 INDICATIVE PROJECT TARGETS

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y

MOLOPO AUSTRALIA LIMITED

The information in this presentation has been compiled by persons meeting the criteria in ASX Listing Rule 5.11. The identity of the relevant persons is dealt with in the releases to ASX.

References to “possible hydrocarbon reserves”, “probable hydrocarbon reserves” and “proved hydrocarbon reserves” have the same meaning as the ASX Listing Rules. The assessment of reserves involves matters of judgement. All amounts involve varying degrees of probability and uncertainty.

This presentation contains forward looking statements, i.e. statements that are not of historical fact. Such forward looking statements include statements regarding Molopo’s future production, profitability, financial position and cash-flow, Molopo’s business strategy, the plans and objectives of Molopo’s management for future operations, Molopo’s development plans, and Molopo’s reserve and resource positions.

Actual results, performance, achievements, outcomes or occurrences may be materially different from any forecast, prediction, estimate or other forward looking statement in this presentation, including those implied by any such forward looking statements.

Forward looking statements are based on numerous assumptions regarding Molopo’s present and future business strategies and the environment in which Molopo will operate in the future. Among the important factors that could cause Molopo’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any prediction, estimate, forecast or other forward looking statement in this presentation are – changes in levels of demand and market prices, increases in relevant input costs, drilling and production results, producible reserves being lower than anticipated, technical and other problems in the production and transportation of products, loss of market, delays in implementing projects, the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on market prices and operating costs, operational problems, political uncertainty, economic conditions in relevant areas of the world, actions of competitors, and the activities of governmental authorities (including changes in taxation, business regulation, environmental laws and fiscal policy).

The uncertainties and risks affecting forward looking statements should be taken into account when considering them and the extent to which it is prudent make decisions based on them.

All forward looking statements are applicable only as of the date of this presentation. Molopo disclaims any obligation or undertaking (except as required by applicable laws) to up-date or revise any forward looking statement to reflect any change in Molopo’s expectations or assessment regarding any such forward looking statement.

Nothing in this presentation is to be regarded as constituting advice or a recommendation regarding the making of any investment in Molopo or any dealing in securities of Molopo.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y