- 1. Following Workflow of a Digital ScholarSmiljana Antonijevi
and Ellysa Stern CahoyPenn State UniversityeHumanities, KNAW
January 17, 2013
2. Project Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded study. April, 2012
June, 2013. Method triangulation: web-based survey ethnographic
interviews focus groups Sciences, humanities, social sciences. 3.
What are the critical challenges for our users? Marshalls user
challenges Accumulation Distribution Curation Long-term
accessMarshall, C., Bly, S., Brun-Cottan, F., (2007). The Long Term
Fate of Our DigitalBelongings : Toward a Service Model for Personal
Archives. Arxiv preprintarXiv:0704.3653. Retrieved from
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1032046 4. Initial questions How do
faculty create, manage, share, and archivepersonal information
collections? Is there a natural place to integrate
personalarchiving in the online scholarly workflow? 5. Initial
outputs A proposed model for integration of archivalpractices into
the online scholarly workflow. Identification of critical digital
literacies for facultymanagement of online scholarly workflow. 6.
Ellysa Stern Cahoy & Scott P. McDonald. Personal Scholarly
Workflow 7. 0% SHARE GATHERFIND ARCHIVE REFLECT ANALYZECITE
ORGANIZEWRITEANNOTATE COMMUNICATE Smiljana Antonijevi. Research
process 8. Web-based survey September 17-30, 2012 324 responses 9.
Web-based survey September 17-30, 2012 324 responses faculty (56%)
21-30 (35%) female (60%) sciences (73%) 10. SearchingHumanities
Sciences 84% 68% 62%64% 60% 58%42% 27%Library databases Google
Scholar Google Search Library catalog 11. Using citation
managersHumanities Sciences No NoYes67%34% Yes33%66% 12. Sharing
Humanities Sciences YesNo 31%37%YesNo63%69% 13. Storing and
archiving97%store relevantmaterials86%back-upmaterials 14.
Storing93%51% 15. Archiving64% 34% 16. Storing, archiving,
losing97% store74% cannot86% back-upaccess files 17. Inaccessible
filesHumanities Sciences 27%23% 18% 18% 16%11%11% 7%Lost
filesFormat Left behind Deleted 18. Training wanted Humanities
Sciences 60% 48%47%47% 45%45% 37% 34% 34% 33% 29% 26%
CitationResearch help Web apps PersonalManagement
ofRepositorymanagementarchivingresearch dataservice 19. None; its
the scholars responsibility to learn how to deal withthese
issues.None - This stuff is my job as a researcher.None; people
should be able to fend for themselves.It varies with
discipline.Nonetraining would not be specific enough for
thediscipline.None, most of these are self-explanatory and the rest
are toocase-specific. 20. Interviews 21. Big problem across
disciplines Inadequate institutional services Big datasets/files
Lack of funding Privacy and sustainability Fragmentation and
accessibility Datamanagement 22. Need for linked data and linked
practices. Repository should also have annotation functions,
sharing, personal profile "I want [a tool] to get my full research
circle closed, where I can go from searching through annotation and
everything else to publication. "I use Dropbox for everything. It
has saved my life, it has changed my life." Datamanagement 23.
Publications perceived aslogest-lasting contribution.Thinking about
preservation interms of end products.Task of publishers, scholars.
24. Sciences: sharing aspreservation.Religious about
sharing.Differences in social media use.Open source/open
access.Tenure-track faculty tend to bemore territorial. 25. We all
teach ourselves.They learn it on their own throughtheir
interactions with theirmentor, colleagues I think the majority of
people arekind of a little bit geeky, like me, andjust enjoy the
gadgetry and enjoy thetechnological, the software. Its a littlebit
of a hobby. 26. Thank you!www.scholarlyworkflow.org
[email protected]#scholarly_work
