Upload
prakash-ranjan
View
158
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
(Information Sheet)
PFMEA Number:
Process Name:
Process Responsibility:
Prepared By:
Affected Product(s):
PFMEA Key Date:
PFMEA Origination Date:
PFMEA Revision Date:
Core Team Members:
Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
1 Lamp Dead Loss of Product
8 4 10 320
2 8
Input Wire Dry
3
Visual Inspection
9 216 ###
8Elacap Dry
3 8 192
8 4
Visual Inspection
5 160
8Track Broken
2 5 80
8 2Visual Inspection
4 64
8 1Visual Inspection
7 56
8 3Visual Inspection
2 48
8DT Defective
8Loose Wrapping
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
Part Failure during Assembly & Aging
No Control after circuit despatch
Transfer to Design Philips
Six Sigma Project to be register for
Solder Defects Suneel Singh-Closer March
End
Touch and Visual Inspection
Input Wire Long Lead Shorting
1 Packing person will check for I/P Long lead. 2. Dixon will explore to have less strip length at PCB side of Input wire
Sudha / Pramod - 15
Feb
ATE & Visual Inspection
SMD Missing Non ATE
Wire Wrong Mounting
Component Missing Non ATE
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
1 Lamp Dead Loss of Product
8Solder Short
1 2 16
3 Flickering ###
4 High Input Power ###
5 ###
6 ###
1 Low Lumens 6 1
ATE inspection
1 6
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
ATE & Visual Inspection
Not Glowing on Min. Voltage
Lamp Abnormal Behave
Circuit Assembly with DT
Loss of Resource & Material, may be
scrap
Reverse of Polarity component
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
Process Function
(Step)
Potential Failure Modes (process
defects)
Potential Failure Effects (KPOVs)
SEV
Potential Causes of
Failure (KPIVs)
OCC
Current Process Controls
DET
RPN
Recommend Actions
Responsible Person &
Target Date
Taken Actions
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
### ###
Severity of Effect
May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous without warning
May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous with warning
Major disruption to production line. Loss of primary function, 100% scrap. Possible jig lock and Major loss of Takt Time
Reduced primary function performance. Product requires repair or Major Variance. Noticeable loss of Takt Time
Medium disruption of production. Possible scrap. Noticeable loss of takt time. Loss of secondary function performance. Requires repair or Minor Variance
Minor disruption to production. Product must be repaired. Reduced secondary function performance.
Minor defect, product repaired or "Use-As-Is" disposition.
Fit & Finish item. Minor defect, may be reprocessed on-line.
Minor Nonconformance, may be reprocessed on-line.
Non
e
No effect
Ext
rem
eH
igh
Mod
erat
eL
ow
Rating
May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous without warning 10
May endanger machine or operator. Hazardous with warning 9
Major disruption to production line. Loss of primary function, 100% scrap. Possible jig lock and 8
Reduced primary function performance. Product requires repair or Major Variance. Noticeable loss of Takt Time 7
Medium disruption of production. Possible scrap. Noticeable loss of takt time. Loss of secondary function performance. Requires repair or Minor Variance 6
Minor disruption to production. Product must be repaired. Reduced secondary function performance. 5
Minor defect, product repaired or "Use-As-Is" disposition. 4Fit & Finish item. Minor defect, may be reprocessed on-line. 3
Minor Nonconformance, may be reprocessed on-line. 2
1
Likelihood of Occurrence
Process is in statistical control.
Low Process is in statistical control. Only
isolatedfailures associated with almost identical processes.
Rem
ote
Failure is unlikely. No known failures associatedwith almost identical
processes.
Failure is almost inevitable
Process is not in statistical control.Similar processes have experienced
problems.
Process is in statistical control but with isolated failures.Previous processes have experienced
occasionalfailures or out-of-control conditions.
Ver
y H
igh
Hig
hM
oder
ate
FailureRate
Capability(Cpk) Rating
1 in 2 < .33 10
1 in 3 > .33 9
1 in 8 > .51 8
1 in 20 > .67 7
1 in 80 > .83 6
1 in 400 > 1.00 5
1 in 2000 > 1.17 4
1 in 15k > 1.33 3
failures associated with almost identical processes.
1 in 150k > 1.50 2
1 in 1.5M > 1.67 1
Likelihood that control will detect failureV
ery
Low
No known control(s) available to detect failure mode.
The process automatically detects failure.Controls will almost certainly detect the existence ofa failure.
Controls have a good chance of detecting the existenceof a failure
Low
Mod
erat
eH
igh
Ver
y H
igh
Controls have a remote chance of detecting the failure.
Controls may detect the existence of a failure
Rating
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1