Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
COMMON EUROPEAN TRANSPORT SYSTEM, OR EXTENSION OF TRANS-EUROPEAN CORRIDORS? Implications for the Hungarian-Ukrainian relations. Fleischer Tamás Institute for World Economics of HAS . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Fleischer TamásInstitute for World Economics of HAS
<http://www.vki.hu/~tfleisch> <[email protected]>
„Eurointegration Challenges in Hungarian-Ukrainian Economic Relations ”
Joint conference of the Institute for Economic Forecasting NASU and Institute for World Economy HAS
Budapest, 26-27 May, 2005.
COMMON EUROPEAN TRANSPORT SYSTEM, OR EXTENSION OF TRANS-EUROPEAN CORRIDORS? Implications for the Hungarian-Ukrainian relations
2
Common European transport system, or extension of Trans-European corridors?
Common Pan-European Corridors (PEC) V and VII
Záhony and Chop: the link between Ukraine and Hungary on corridor V (KIUT conference)
Corridors from Asia: Silk Route(s)
The UN ESCAP networks
European networks of inter-regional relations TEN, PEC (and TINA)
Centralised Hungarian structure of the corridors
Summary
3
Source: http://www.khvm.hu/EU-integracio/A_magyarorszagi_TINA_halozat/Image11.gif
Common Helsinki, or Pan-European transport corridors
Common Pan-European Corridors (PEC)
4
Conference on reviving of „The Silk Route”
Conference on corridor No. 5
5
Interoperability discontinuity
6
Interoperability discontinuity
7
Interoperability discontinuity
8
Quality discontinuity
9
10
The old Silk routes
11
The old Silk routes
12
„The New Silk Road” - TRACECA
"The New Silk Road," or Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia (TRACECA), was enthusiastically received by European Union (EU) and the United States when it was proposed in May, 1993, by Central Asian leaders meeting with the EU in Brussels. The vision of a superhighway not only of asphalt, but of rails, pipelines, and fiber-optic cables stretching from Rotterdam to China’s Yellow Sea Coast seemed full of promise not only to firms who would build these systems, but also to those who sought to prosper from the region’s wealth in minerals, cotton, and its best-known commodities, oil and natural gas.Source: http://www.american.edu/TED/silkroad.htm#r3
13
The old Silk routes
http://www.american.edu/TED/silkroad.htm
14
„The New Silk Road” - TRACECA
In April of 1997, officials met in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi. This conference focused on connecting the western extensions of the New Silk Road to existing European transport routes through the Black Sea littoral countries, Bulgaria, Romania, and Ukraine .Source: http://www.american.edu/TED/silkroad.htm#r3
15
„The New Silk Road” - TRACECA
In April of 1997, officials met in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi. This conference focused on connecting the western extensions of the New Silk Road to existing European transport routes through the Black Sea littoral countries, Bulgaria, Romania, and Ukraine .Source: http://www.american.edu/TED/silkroad.htm#r3
Gorshkov T – Bagaturia G TRACECA—Restoration of Silk Route. Japan Railway & Transport Review 28 Sept 2001.
16
About a plan of a transport corridor Budapest –
Nyíregyháza – Nagybánya – Chisinau – Odessa (Népszabadság 8. February 2005.)
Another corridor
17
About a planned transport corridor Wien –
Bratislava – Kijev – Moskva – Vladivostok (Népszabadság 21. April 2005.)
Another corridor
18
Asian Highway Network 2004 – UN ESCAP (=ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC)
19
The Intergovernmental Agreement on the Asian Highway Network will come into force on 4 July 2005, giving new boost to the flow of international traffic in this region. The agreement, which has so far been signed by 27 member states is stipulated to enter into force on the ninetieth day following the date on which the Governments of at least eight states have consented to be bound by the agreement. The approval of the Government of Cambodia in April satisfied this requirement. Now eight countries, namely Cambodia, China, Japan, Myanmar, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka, Uzbekistan and Viet Nam have ratified, accepted or approved the agreement.Source: http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/common/TIS/AH/AH_into_force.asp
Asian Highway Network 2004 – UN ESCAP
20
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC REPORT OF THE REGIONAL MEETING
FOR DRAFTING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ON THE TRANS-ASIAN RAILWAY
NETWORK 22 – 23 NOVEMBER 2004, BANGKOK
Source: http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/common/TIS/TAR/report_full_23Nov04.pdf
Trans-Asian Railway Network 2004 – UN ESCAP
21
Trans-Asian Railway Network 2004 – UN ESCAP
22
Trans-Asian Railway Network 2004 – UN ESCAP
23
Trans-Asian Railway Network 2004 – UN ESCAP
24
Common European transport system, or extension of Trans-European corridors?
Common Pan-European Corridors (PEC) V and VII
Záhony and Chop: the link between Ukraine and Hungary and the KIUT conference
Corridors from Asia: Silk Route(s)
The UN ESCAP networks
European networks of inter-regional relations: TEN, PEC and TINA
Hungarian structure of the corridors
Summary
25Source: Az országos közúthálózat 1991-2000 évekre szóló-fejlesztési programja 1991, KHVM.
The birth of corridor thinking, renumbering the roads in 1975
TEN and its extension to the east
26
TEN and its extension to the east
What does the eastern extension of the TEN means ?
27 Extension of the grid toward the east
TEN and its extension to the east
28 Prolongation of the east-west corridors
TEN and its extension to the east
29
TEN and its extension to the east
Prolongation of the east-west corridors
30
TEN and its extension to the east
Prolongation of the east-west corridors
31
TEN and its extension to the east
Prolongation of the east-west corridors
32
Source: http://www.khvm.hu/EU-integracio/A_magyarorszagi_TINA_halozat/Image11.gif
Helsinki, or Pan-European transport corridors
TEN and its extension to the east
33
Hungarian interpretation of the Pan-European Corridors (PEC)
34
Levels of the Hungarian road network
35
Main elements: three east-west corridors, four north-south corridors and additional rectangular elements.
The model also demonstrate two sensitive areas, the resort area of lake Balaton and the conurbation of Budapest as avoidable zones for transit.
Thick line shows the suggested crossing of the country by the two most important pan-European corridors (No. 4-and No. 5)
A possible inter-regional corridor network structure in Hungary
36
A possible inter-regional corridor network structure in Hungary
37
A possible inter-regional corridor network structure in Hungary
38
A possible inter-regional corridor network structure in Hungary
39
A possible inter-regional corridor network structure in Hungary
Forrás: Fleischer Tamás – Magyar Emőke – Tombácz Endre – Zsikla György (2001): A Széchenyi Terv autópálya-fejlesztési programjának stratégiai környezeti hatásvizsgálata. 109 p. A Budapesti Közgazdaságtudományi és Államigazgatási Egyetem Környezettudományi Intézetének tanulmányai, 6. szám. Sorozatszerkesztő Kerekes Sándor és Kiss Károly. Budapest, 2001 december
40
And the official motorway network development plan „Sztrada express” GKM 2003
41
42
Common European transport system, or extension of Trans-European corridors?
Common Pan-European maps are necessary
Záhony / Chop: co-operation and permeability: avoiding the construction of new sharp frontier-line
Think in networks not just in corridors
Grid structure of the inter-regional networks
And: do not forget the other levels of domestic and local relations: without those the big corridors does not bring benefit and prosperity
Fleischer TamásInstitute for World Economics of HAS<http://www.vki.hu/~tfleisch> <[email protected]>
„Eurointegration Challenges in Hungarian-Ukrainian Economic Relations ” Joint conference of the Institute for Economic Forecasting NASU and Institute for World Economy HAS Budapest, 26-27 May, 2005.
Common European Transport System, or extension of Trans-European corridors? Implications for the Hungarian-Ukrainian relations
THANKS FOR THE
ATTENTION !
