Fishery biology of jumbo flying squidDosidicus gigasoff Costa Rica Dome

J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research) DOI 10.1007/s11802-014-2165-9 ISSN 1672-5182, 2014 13 (3): 485-490 http://www.ouc.edu.cn/xbywb/ E-mail:[email protected]

Fishery Biology of Jumbo Flying Squid Dosidicus gigas off Costa Rica Dome

CHEN Xinjun1), 2), 3), *, LI Jianghua1), LIU Bilin1), 2), 3), LI Gang1), 2), 3), and LU Huajie1), 2), 3)

1) College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P. R. China 2) National Distant-Water Fisheries Engineering Research Center, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P. R. China 3) Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources of Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai

Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P. R. China

(Received September 26, 2012; revised November 4, 2012; accepted August 26, 2013) © Ocean University of China, Science Press and Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Abstract The jumbo flying squid (Dosidicus gigas) population was surveyed with the help of Chinese squid jigging vessels off the Costa Rica Dome (4˚–11˚N, 90˚–100˚W) in 2009 and 2010. The daily catch of D. gigas in the two survey cruises ranged from 0 to 5.5 t and was mostly obtained from the areas bounded by 6˚–9˚N and 91˚–94˚W and by 6˚30´–7˚30Ń and 96˚–97˚W. The sea surface temperature in the areas yielding the most catch ranged from 27.5 to 29℃. The sex ratio of the total catch was 3.75:1 (female: male). The mantle length of the squid ranged from 211 to 355 mm (male) and from 204 to 429 mm (female) with an average of 297.9 and 306.7 mm, respectively. In the relationship of the mantle length (mm) and body weight (g) of the squid, there was no significant dif-ference between sexes. The female and male were at a similar maturity, and most individuals are maturing or have matured with a few females being spent. The size (mantle length) and age at the first sexual maturity were 297 mm and 195 d in females, and less than 211 mm and 130 d in males, respectively. Most of the sampled stomachs (70.6%) had no food remains. The major preys of the squids were fish, cephalopods and crustaceans, with the most abundant Myctophum orientale and D. gigas. The preys in more than 65% of the non-empty sampled stomachs evidenced the cannibalism of D. gigas. The results improved current understanding of the fishery biology of D. gigas off the Costa Rica Dome, which may facilitate the assessment and management of relative fishery re-sources.

Key words Dosidicus gigas; fishery biology; Costa Rica Dome

1 Introduction In last two decades, jumbo flying squid, Dosidicus gi-

gas (d’Orbigny, 1835), has evolved as one of the most important species of cephalopod fisheries in eastern Pa-cific. D. gigas is widely distributed in eastern Pacific on north from California (37˚N), on south to Chile (47˚S) and on east up to 125˚W (Nesis, 1983; Nigmatullin et al., 2001). The highest abundance of D. gigas usually occurs off Peruvian and Chilean coast in southern hemisphere as well as in Gulf of California and off the western coast of Baja California in northern hemisphere (Markaida and Sosa-Nishizaki, 2003; Liu et al., 2010). Additionally, D. gigas is distributed in the water off Costa Rica Dome with a strong upwelling. Japanese squid jiggers targeted D. gigas in this area obtained a high catch during fall of 1997 (El Niño) but a poor catches during fall of 1999 (La Niña) (Ichii et al., 2002) in the water off Costa Rica Dome.

The fisheries biology of D. gigas was previously stud-ied in Gulf of California as well as Peruvian and Chi-

* Corresponding author. Tel.:0086-21-61900306

E-mail:[email protected]

lean water (Nigmatullin et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2008). Nigmatullin et al. (2001) found that the population struc-ture of D. gigas was complex and comprised of three groups in terms of sizes: 1) the small-sized (130–260 mm in the mantle length (ML) of adult males and 140–340

mm of adult females, mainly in near-equatorial area), 2) the medium-sized (240–420 mm in ML of males and 280–600 mm in of females, widely in the eastern Pacific, and 3) the large-sized (larger than 400–500 mm ML of males and 550–650 nm to 1000–1200 mm of females, mainly in northern and southern periphery, mostly north-ward of 10˚–15˚N and southward of 10˚–15˚S. Off the Costa Rica Dome, D. gigas is one of the most important and highly abundant squid species in marine ecosystem. Ichii et al. (2002) described the size and maturity of jumbo flying squid in this area. Chen et al. (2013) found that the ML of D. gigas was 205–429 mm and the age was no more than 10 months in females and 8 months in males as were indicated by their statoliths microstructure. The maximum absolute daily growth rate and instantane-ous growth rate of D. gigas in ML were reached during its age of 181–210 d and 151–180 d for females and males, respectively. Additionally, Chen et al. (2013) proposed

CHEN et al. / J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research) 2014 13: 485-490

486

that the Costa Rica Dome and adjacent waters serve as a potential spawning ground because of the high proportion of mature squid as well as the presence of rhyncho-teuthion paralarvae and high primary productivity re-sulted from the strong upwelling.

At present, little information is available on the fishery biology of D. gigas in the waters off the Costa Rica Dome. Based on the two scientific surveys of D. gigas by Chinese squid jigging vessels in the waters off the Costa Rica Dome in 2009 and 2010, the present study aimed to identify the environmental variables that influence the spatial distribution of D. gigas and to provide information on the population structure, maturity, and feeding charac-teristics of this squid species, further improving under-standing of the biology of D. gigas off the Costa Rica Dome. The information derived in this study is critical for quantifying the population dynamics of this squid and is of guiding significance to the assessment and manage-ment of this important marine resource.

2 Materials and Methods The two surveys of D. gigas were carried out with the

two Chinese squid jiggers, Fenghui 16 and Zhe Yunyu No 807 (Table 1). Sampling stations were pre-selected and defined by 30’×30’ longitude and latitude. The final sam-pling positions were defined as the actual sites where D. gigas were caught (Fig.1). A total of 565 individuals were randomly sampled from the catch and taken to the labo-ratory. The sampling location, water temperature, and salinity at different water depths from surface to 300 m deep were measured with Sea-birds (SE-37). The number of jig lines in use (15–20 jiggers per line), fishing depth, time at the beginning and end of each drift, and total catch were recorded.

The dorsal ML (to 1 mm) and body weight (BW, to 10 g) were measured for all samples. The sex was identified and the maturity was evaluated with naked eyes following method described early (Lipinski and Underhill, 1995). The maturity was graded into the five stages, i.e., I–II, immature; III, maturing; IV, mature; and V, spent. Major preys in the stomach contents were identified based on laboratory analysis of undigested tissues. The degree of stomach fullness was recorded using the following scales: 0–empty; 1–little content and less than 1/5 full; 2–less than half full; 3–more than half full; and 4–full (Chen et al., 2007). The daily ages of females and males were deter-mined by the statoliths microstructure, i.e., 130–289 d and 130–240 d, respectively (Chen et al., 2013).

The BW-ML relationship was quantified using the fol-lowing equation:

W=aMLb,

where W is the BW, and a and b are two parameters to be estimated. Logarithm transformation was applied to the equation and the parameters a and b were estimated using the linear least squares method (Ricker, 1975). The method of analysis of variance (ANCOVA) was used to test the difference between sexes.

Table 1 Key parameters of the squid jigging survey vessels

Key vessel parameters Fenghui No 16

Zhe YunyuNo 807

Total length 49.20 m 54.3 m Gross register tonnage 492 t 432 t Number of squid jigging machines 26 38 Power of fishing lights 120×1 kW 130×1 kW

Fig.1 The two survey areas covered by the Chinese squid jigger vessels off the Costa Rica Dome in 2009 and 2010.

All individuals were examined to determine the ML and age at which 50% squid were mature (referred to as ‘size at first maturity’ or ‘ML50%’, and ‘age at first matur-ity’ or ‘Age50%’). The change in the proportion of mature individuals with length or age was fitted to the logistic model with the least squares method (Liu et al., 2010), in which,

( )

1

1 ii c dML

Pe− +

=+

,

where Pi is the relative frequency of mature individuals in length class MLi or Agei, c and d are the regression con-stants, and ML50% (or Age50%) =c/d. Data analysis was performed in SAS (Version 9.1).

3 Results 3.1 Catch and Its Relationship with

Environmental Factors During the two surveys, the daily catch (CPUE) of D.

gigas ranged from 0 to 5.5 t with no bycatch. The total catch was 95.5 t and the average CPUE reached 0.72 t. Overall, 75.7% of the fishing days had the CPUE lower


487

than 1 t, and 17.4% of the fishing days had CPUE more than 2 t. The catch mainly came from the areas bounded by 6˚–8˚N and 95˚30´–97˚W, and by 6˚–9˚N and 91˚– 95˚W (Fig.2). The high density of D. gigas appeared in the above two areas under different environmental condi-tions (Table 2).

In the fishing area of 6˚–8˚N and 95˚30´–97˚W and during the period from July to September, surface water temperature ranged from 27.5 to 29.0℃, from 14.0 to 15.0℃ at the depth of 50 m and from 13.0 to 13.7℃ at the depth of 200 m. The corresponding water salinity ranged from 33.4 to 33.9, from 34.8 to 34.9 and from 34.8 to 34.9, respectively (Table 2). In the fishing area of 6˚–9˚N and 91˚–95˚W and during the period from February to March, water temperature and salinity were 28.0–29.0℃ and 33.8–33.9 on the surface, 24.0–25.0℃ and 34.3–34.4 at the depth of 50 m, and 15.0–17.0℃ and 34.7–34.8 at

the depth of 200 m, respectively (Table 2).

Fig.2 The spatial distribution of daily catch of D. gigas in the 0.5˚×0.5˚ latitude and longitude off the Costa Rica Dome in 2009 and 2010.

Table 2 Summary of the survey areas and sample collection of D. gigas

Date Vessel Survey area Planned station Fishing station No. of samples Range of ML

(mm)

July–August 2009 Fenghui No 16,

Zhe Yunyu No 807 5˚–10˚N, 91˚–100˚W 121 115 215 204–429

Feb.–Mar. and Aug.–Sep. 2010

Fenghui No 16, Zhe Yunyu No 807

5˚21Ń–10˚06Ń, 90˚49´W–97˚03´W

106 110 350 204–426

3.2 D. gigas Population Structure In total, the sex ratio of the catch was 3.75: 1 (female:

male), significantly higher than the expected (1: 1; P>

0.05). The ML of males ranged from 211 to 355 mm with a mean of 297.9 mm and that of females ranged from 204 to 429 mm with a mean of 306.7 mm. The BW of males ranged from 170 to 1050 g with a mean of 615 g and that of females ranged from 240 to 2120 g with a mean of 712 g. The majority (72.5%) of the males were 280–340 mm in ML while the majority (73.8%) of females were 260–360

mm in ML (Fig.3a). A similar range was observed for

Fig.3 The mantle length (a) and body weight (b) composi-tion of female and male squid.

BW, the majority (78.0%) of the males were 400–800 g and the majority of females (71.6%) were 400–1000 g (Fig.3b).

3.3 ML-BW and ML-Somatic BW Relationship

Fig.4 The relationship between body weight and mantle length of male (a) and female (b) squid.

The ML (cm)-BW (g) relationship of the samples col-lected were estimated as

BW = 0.076186ML2.62945 (R2=0.8868, n=119)


488

for males (Fig.4a), and

BW = 0.100846ML2.5745 (R2=0.89233, n=446)

for females (Fig.4b), respectively. There was no significant difference in the BW-ML relationship between sexes (P > 0.05).

3.4 Maturity The maturity of the squid was different between sexes

(Table 3). In males, 81.4% of the total were at stage IV, 15.2% at stage III, and 3.4% at stage II. In females, 42.4% of the total were at stages I–II, 40.1% at stage III, and 26.6% at stage IV (Table 3). There were only 0.9% of the females at stage V (Table 3). For a given size, males were more likely to be mature than females (Table 3).

Table 3 Composition of the sexual maturity stages of female and male D. gigas

Sexual maturity (%) Sex N

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ

Females 446 3.6 28.8 40.1 26.6 0.9 Males 119 0 3.4 15.2 81.4 0

Female ML50% estimated was 297 mm and Age50% was

195 d. The change in the proportion of mature females with size and age (Fig.5) were described by the following equations:

20.024993 ( 297)

1( 0.964)

1 ii ML

p Re− × −

= =+

and

20.04035 ( 195)

1( 0.985)

1 ii Age

p Re− × −

= =+

.

Fig.5 The size (a) and age (b) at first maturity of female squid.

For males, the relationship between the proportion of maturity and the size and age could not be quantified with logistic models because immature males were lacking, and ML50% or Age50% was not estimated. However, we believe that the size and age at first maturity of males should be smaller or younger than those of the smallest specimen in this study (i.e., 211 mm and 130-day-old, respectively) because only 2 immature males were found in the catch.

3.5 Diet The stomachs analyzed rarely had food remains and on

average 70.6% of the stomachs were empty. Regarding the fullness stages, 19.9% and 8.1% of the samples were graded to stage 1 and 2, respectively, while only 1.4% of the total samples were graded to stage 3.

The stomach contents included three major prey groups: fish, cephalopods and crustaceans, which represented 55.8%, 38.1%, and 6.1% of the stomach contents by weight, respectively. The species remains in the stomach contents were identified as Myctophidae, Sardinella, and D. gigas. Approximately 65% of the stomachs showed the evidence of cannibalism. However, cannibalism was much greater for the squids caught in the light field around the survey vessel, and small squid (ML<10 cm) were often attacked by large-sized D. gigas around the squid jigging vessels in the fishing area of 6˚–8˚N and 95˚30´–97˚W during August to September.

4 Discussion 4.1 CPUE Distribution and Its Relationship with

Marine Environment The results from this study showed that D. gigas was

widely distributed in the survey area, and that the major-ity of the catch came from the areas defined by 6˚–8˚N and 95˚30´–97˚W and by 6˚–9˚N and 91˚–95˚W. Our re-sults were consistent with the previous (Ichii et al., 2002) despite the distribution density of D. gigas varied. Ichill et al. (2002) reported that the fishery operation for D. gigas was conducted in the waters of 7˚–9˚N and 92˚–100˚W from June through November in 1997, and the monthly average CPUE (tonnes per vessel per day) was 19.4 tonnes in August, 15.2 tonnes in September, and 8.5 tonnes in October. In 1999, the fishery was only con-ducted in the same fishing areas from August to Septem-ber and the monthly average CPUE was low, 3.1 tonnes in August and 2.3 tonnes in September. The jumbo flying squid abundance within the 200 nautical miles exclusive economic zone of the Costa Rica Dome was unknown because the fishery was not permitted.

The distribution of D. gigas was closely related to sea surface temperature (SST) and its optimal SST ranged from 27.5 to 29℃ in the waters off the Costa Rica Dome. Ichii et al. (2002) found that SST was warmer throughout the fishing areas in October 1997 (El Niño) and August to September of 1999 (26–30℃) but was cooler in October 1999 (La Niña) (22–26℃). The oceanographic conditions


489

of this fishing ground are not the same as those in the southeastern Pacific. Ichii et al. (2002) found that a high abundance of squid occurred in association with the well-developed countercurrent ridge (upwelling) off the Costa Rica Dome during fall 1997, but not during fall 1999 when the countercurrent ridge was less developed. In the southeastern Pacific, the fishing ground of squid was likely formed as a result of the upwelling from Peru Current. Waluda et al. (2006) reported that the high den-sity of D. gigas took place in waters with SST of 17–22℃ in the Peruvian waters. Liu et al. (2010) found that the suitable SST for D. gigas was 17.5–21℃ on the northern fishing ground (20˚–30˚S) and 14–16℃ on the southern fishing ground (37˚–41˚S) off Chilean waters. Therefore, we concluded that SST greatly influenced the spatial dis-tribution and abundance of D. gigas, which was in agree-ment with the results obtained in previous studies (Ander-son and Rodhouse, 2001; Nigmatullin et al., 2001).

4.2 Population Structure The intraspecific structure of D. gigas in the eastern

Pacific is complex (Nigmatullin et al., 2001). There are many local, sometimes allopatric but mostly sympatric and parapatric groups, which differ from each other in a variety of important ecological aspects. The distributional ranges of both the small- and medium-sized groups overlap fully or partially, and the small-sized group is found pre-dominantly in the equator adjacent area (Nigmatullin et al., 2001). Ichii et al. (2002) found the same pattern in Octo-ber 1997 and 1999, that is, ML of jumbo flying squid ranges from 16 to 35 cm (mostly between 17 and 28 cm) in October 1997, and from 15 to 39 cm (mostly between 18 and 29 cm) in October 1999. The size of our samples ranged from 204 to 429 mm in ML, likely covering the possible size range of this species. Within the Gulf of California, the population structure of D. gigas was com-plex and consisted of three groups of different sizes at maturity (Markaida, 2006). It is unknown if the D. gigas stock off the Peruvian and Chilean coast is the same population of squid that inhabits the Gulf of California and off the Costa Rica Dome in the north of the equator.

4.3 Sex Ratio and Maturity Ichii et al. (2002) found that female squid was domi-

nant in the catch in 1997 and 1999, accounting for 90%–94% of the total population with 5%–15% of the female samples copulated. There was a tendency that mature and large females were more frequently distrib-uted toward southern areas in both years. Of the samples collected in two surveys in the present study, female squid accounted for 79.0% of the total, lower than that obtained by Japanese squid jigger in 1997 and 1999. In our survey, the medium-sized squid jigger with three lines of 1.3 mm in diameter was used. Thus, it is less likely to catch the small-sized D. gigas, mostly males, compared with large individuals. The observed skewed sex ratio could be attributed to the selectivity of fishing gears.

We found that male D. gigas matured at smaller sizes

than the females did, as is commonly described in cepha-lopods (González and Guerra, 1996). However, the size range of mature male and female D. gigas in this study differ from that found in other waters. Tafur et al. (2001) reported that the male squid had a size at first maturity of 136–474 mm during 1991 to 1995, and that the range of size at first maturity of female squid was 285–327 mm in the Peruvian waters. Hernandez-Herrera et al. (1998) and Markaida et al. (2004) showed that the D. gigas popula-tions within the Gulf of California matured at a larger size, 510 mm in females and 420 mm in males. Liu et al. (2010) found that the size at first maturity was 638 mm ML in females and 565 mm ML in males in the waters off EEZ of Chile. The difference in the size at first maturity among fishing areas can be related to the different geo-graphical populations or spawning populations. Alterna-tively, the size at first maturity of D. gigas may vary with environmental conditions as well. Argüelles and Tafur (2010) described the inter-annual variability of the size at maturity, somatic and reproductive investment of mature males, and females of D. gigas during the spawning peak (October–March) during 1994–2006 in the Northern Humboldt Current Ecosystem (Peruvian waters).

4.4 Growth and Diet Significant difference was found in the slope of loga-

rithmic length-weight relationship between the results of this study and the previous. The parameter (b) of the length-weight relationship was smaller than that reported by Ibanez and Cubillos (2007) in central-south Chile in 2003–2004 (b=3.2 for both sexes), and by Chen et al. (2010) off EEZ of Chile in 2006–2008 (b= 2.8036 for males, and b=3.1446 for females). These parameters are different from those of purpleback flying squid, Stheno- teuthis oualaniensis, near the equator of the northwest Indian Ocean (b= 2.9115 for females, and b=2.5842 for males; Chen et al., 2007).

High occurrence of cannibalism in the diet of the squid in the study area (>65%) proved that D. gigas is a species with high cannibalistic feeding. This result is consistent with previous findings in the Gulf of California (Markaida, 2006). In the present study, myctophids, mainly Mycto-phum orientale, were predominant in the waters off the Costa Rica Dome. D. gigas is a predator-opportunist, whose feeding spectrum is different with sizes and re-gions (Wang and Chen, 2005). The feeding habits of D. gigas change during ontogeny with a shift in preference from crustaceans to fish, and the prey size increases as the squid grows (Schchetinnikov, 1989). The prey size, on average, is 5–7 cm and occasionally larger than 10–15 cm for large adult squid (Markaida and Sosa-Nishizaki, 2003). In addition, diet varies by location and is dominated in different places, by mesopelagic fishes such as Benthosema panamense, Triphoturus mexicanus, and Vinciguerria lu-cetia in the Gulf of California and adjacent waters (Markaida and Sosa-Nishizaki, 2003).

In summary, we have surveyed the D. gigas population in two cruises in 2009 and 2010. The results greatly im-proved our understanding of fishery biology of D. gigas


490

off the Costa Rica Dome and may guide the assessment and management of relative fishery resources. Further studies are needed to investigate the spatial and temporal variability in the distribution and migration, population structures and key biological parameters of D. gigas in the waters off the Costa Rica Dome as well as the Cali-fornia and Peruvian waters and to identify the key habitat requirements of this important marine species.

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the anonymous re-

viewers for their making valuable comments resulting in significant improvements of the manuscript. The authors also thank the supports of the two scientific surveys made by Fenghui No 16 and Zhe Yunyu No 807. This work was funded by National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC 41276156), National High-tech R&D Program of China (863 Program; 2012AA092303), Project of Shang-hai science and technology innovation (12231203900), Industrialization program of National Development and Reform Commission (2159999), and Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project. Also this study was sup-ported by National Distant-water Fisheries Engineering Research Center.

References Anderson, C. I. H., and Rodhouse, P. G., 2001. Life cycles,

oceanography and variability: Ommastrephid squid in vari-able oceanographic environments. Fisheries Research, 54: 133-143.

Argüelles, J., and Tafur, R., 2010. New insights on the biology of the jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas in the Northern Humboldt Current System: Size at maturity, somatic and reproductive investment. Fisheries Research, 106: 507-518.

Chen, X. J., Liu, B. L., and Chen, Y., 2008. A review of the de-velopment of Chinese distant-water squid jigging fisheries. Fisheries Research, 89: 211-221.

Chen, X. J., Liu, B. L., Tian, S. Q., Qian, W. G., and Zhao, X. H., 2007. Fishery biology of purpleback squid, Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis, in the northwest Indian Ocean. Fisheries Re-search, 83 (1): 98-104.

Chen, X. J., Li, J. H., Liu, B. L., Chen, Y., Li, G., Fang, Z., and Tian, S. Q., 2013. Age, growth and population structure of Jumbo flying squid, Dosidicus gigas, off the Costa Rica Dome. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 93 (2): 567-573.

González, A. F., and Guerra, A., 1996. Reproductive biology of the short-finned squid Illex coindetii (Cephalopoda, Ommas-trephidae) of the northeastern Atlantic. Sarsia, 81: 107-118.

Hernández-Herrera, A., Morales-Bojórquez, E., Cisneros-Mata, M. A., Nevárez-Martínez, M. O., and Rivera-Parta, G. I., 1998. Management strategy for the giant squid (Dosidicus gigas) fishery in the Gulf of California, Mexico. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations, Data Reports, 39: 212-218.

Ibáñez, C. M., and Cubillos, L. A., 2007. Seasonal variation in the length structure and reproductive condition of the jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (d’Orbigny, 1835) off central-south Chile. Scientia Marina, 71 (1): 123-128.

Ichii, T., Mahapatra, K., Watanabe, T., Yastu, A., Inagake, D., and Okada, Y., 2002. Occurrence of jumbo flying squid Dosi-dicus gigas aggregations associated with the countercurrent ridge off the Costa Rica Dome during 1997 El Niño and 1999 La Niña. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 231: 151-166.

Lipinski, M., and Underhill, L. G., 1995. Sexual maturation in squid: Quantum or continuum? South African Journal of Ma-rine Science, 15: 207-223

Liu, B. L., Chen, X. J., Lu, H. J., Chen, Y., and Qian, W. G., 2010. Fishery biology of the jumbo flying squid Dosidicus gigas off the Exclusive Economic Zone of Chilean waters. Scientia Marina, 74 (4): 687-695.

Lorrain, A., Arguelles, J., Alegre, A., Bertrand, A., Munaron, J. M., Richard, P., and Cherel, Y., 2011. Sequential isotopic sig-nature along gladius highlights contrasted individual foraging strategies of Jumbo Squid (Dosidicus gigas). PLoS One, 6 (7): e22194.

Markaida, U., and Sosa-Nishizaki, O., 2003. Food and feeding habits of jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (Cephalopoda: Om-mastrephidae) from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 83 (3): 507-522.

Markaida, U., 2006. Population structure and reproductive bi-ology of jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas from the Gulf of Cali-fornia after the 1997–1998 El Niño event. Fisheries Science, 79: 28-37.

Markaida, U., Quinonez-Velazquez, C., and Sosa-Nishizaki, O., 2004. Age, growth and maturation of jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Fisheries Science, 66 (1): 31-47.

Nesis, K. N., 1983. Dosidicus gigas. In: Cephalopod Life Cycles: Species Accounts, Vol. I. Boyle, P. R., ed., Academic Press, 215-231.

Nigmatullin, C. M., Nesis, K. N., and Arkhipkin, A. I., 2001. A review of the biology of the jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae). Fisheries Science, 54 (1): 9-19.

Ricker, W. E., 1975. Computation and interpretation of biologi-cal statistics of fish populations. Bulletin Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191: 382.

Ruiz-Cooley, I., Villa, E., and Gould, W., 2010. Ontogenic variation of d13C and d15N recorded in the gladius of the jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas: Geographic differences. Ma-rine Ecology Progress Series, 399: 187-198.

Shchetinnikov, A. S., 1989. Food spectrum of Dosidicus gigas (Oegopsida) in the ontogenesis. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 68: 28-39 (in Russian with English Abstract).

Tafur, R., Villegas, P., Rabi, M., and Yamashiro, C., 2001. Dy-namics of maturation, seasonality of reproduction and spawning grounds of the jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in Peruvian waters. Fisher-ies Science, 54: 33-50.

Waluda, C. M., Yamashiro, C., and Rodhouse, P. G., 2006. In-fluence of the ENSO cycle on the light-fishery for Dosidicus gigas in the Peru Current: an analysis of remotely sensed data. Fisheries Science, 79: 56-63.

Wang, Y. G., and Chen, X. J., 2005. The Resource and Biology of Economic Oceanic Squid in the World. Ocean Press, Bei-jing, 79-295.

Yokawa, K., 1995. Isozyme comparison of large, medium and small size specimens of Dosidicus gigas. Proceedings Re-search Conference Squid Resources Fishery Condition. Ha-chinoche, 1993, 48-52 (in Japanese).

(Edited by Qiu Yantao)

Documents

Fishery biology of jumbo flying squidDosidicus gigasoff Costa Rica Dome