FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    1/23

    To,

    1. Honble LG of Delhi.

    2. Honble Chief Justice, Delhi High Court.

    3.

    The Chief Secretary to Govt. of Delhi.4. Inspector General of Wildlife, MoEF.

    5. Secretary to AWBI.

    6. The Chief Wildlife Warden of Delhi and Haryana.

    7. Honble Chief Justice, Punjab and Haryana High Court.

    8. SHO, Police Station, Nuh.

    9. The CEO, Haryana Election Commission.

    10.RO cum SDM, Nuh.

    Subject: FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain along with the custodian of male

    elephant.

    Greetings,

    The Election Commission of India (ECI) issued an order banning the use of animals by

    political parties during campaigns. In an advisory issued, the election commission has

    asked political parties not to use any animals for campaign in any manner, animal rights

    group OIPA - Indian People for Animals www.oipa.org said that following repeated

    requests by animal activist Naresh Kadian and Sukanya Kadian, the election commission

    asked political parties and candidates to refrain from using animals for their campaigns.

    "The Commission has received representations from OIPA India, alleging that animals like

    horses, ponies, donkeys, elephants, camels and bulls are subjected to cruelty in different

    ways in connection with election campaigns," the election commission advisory stated. "It

    is alleged that the animals are often made to carry loads beyond permissible limits, made to

    work long hours, and some candidates even paint slogans and election symbols on them

    using harmful chemicals," the advisory said. The election commission has issued an

    advisory to all political parties and asked them not to violate the Prevention of Cruelty to

    Animals Act, 1960, and the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. "Bulls, donkeys, elephants and

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    2/23

    other animals used in election campaigns are commonly beaten, pushed into crowds,

    overloaded and otherwise abused.They are also often undernourished and denied

    adequate food and water. Wounds and other injuries are common. "Animals have no

    political allegiances and do not deserve to be whipped and forced through crowds or

    bullied by people who don''t agrees with the other party''s politics.

    On September 26, 2014 Ch. Zakir Hussain, candidate of INLD abused male elephant while

    submitting his nomination, wild animal was badly abused, can damage public property and

    life due to heavy crowd, public nuisance as well, no permission was obtained from the

    competent Authorities, where as male elephant abuser custodian also to be booked for the

    violation of the terms and conditions of the ownership because elephant can not abused for

    these kinds of political functions read with the section 3, 11 and 38 of the Prevention of

    Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Wildlife Protection Act, 1972; IPC 268, 341,120-B etc.,

    being an non official Member of the State Board for Wildlife, Haryana along with the

    volunteers of the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (Ministry of Environment and Forest), I

    here by requested you to please lodge FIR against the candidate Zakir Hussain along withthe elephant abuser custodian after confiscating the abused elephant, it is further requested

    that CWLW may kindly take up the matter of cancellation of male elephant ownership,

    immediate rescue and rehabilitation of this National heritage animal of India.

    It is further submitted that Notice was issued by the RO at Nuh but SHO failed to lodge

    FIR against all offenders, where as proof of burden on the accused instead of prosecution,

    hence we are compelled to issue notice under section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act,

    1972, because National Heritage animal of India can't be abused as vehicle of pride, where

    as Hon'ble Supreme Court of India uphold animal rights in the recent judgement of

    Jallikattu, MoEF instructions about elephants are not implemented by Haryana and Delhi,

    which were issued in 2008, where as constitution of Animal Rights Commission is alsorequired, Hon'ble Court of Law may kindly treat it as Public Interest Litigation. It is also

    reported that this male Elephant belongs to Delhi, already FIR No. 274 dated 19-8-2012

    was lodged with Police Station, Hodal by Naresh Kadian but syndicate of Wildlife official

    along with elephant custodians are working and this crime was happened with the

    consultation of Wildlife Inspector of Sohna and CWLW of Delhi, criminal conspiracy

    against male elephant.

    Now questions arise:

    1.

    Why elephant ownership was granted to a private person and for what purpose?2. Whether custodian of an elephant has proper housing facilities for treatment, care

    and shelter?

    3. Whether MoEF instructions which were issued in 2008 properly followed along with

    the Jaipur Bench of Rajasthan High Court orders banning iron ankush?

    4. Whether section 38-H of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 properly implemented?

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    3/23

    5. Why elephant was abused for pride, joy rides, publicity tool, as vehicle, personnel

    gain and profit?

    6. Whether custodian of elephant properly trained to handle elephant and properly

    financial sound, to keep elephant?

    7. Whether Delhi and Haryana are natural habitat of the elephants?

    8.

    When elephant presence banned by the Wildlife Department of Maharashtra in

    Mumbai and Thane then why elephants are being allowed in the urban areas of

    Haryana and Delhi?

    9. Whether custodian of elephant along with District Administration is competent to

    handle public nuisance, damage of public life and property because another male

    elephant became out of control in Delhi at Rajghat?

    10.When thorn bits are prohibited by the Government under law then why these male

    elephant custodians are using ban thorn bits?

    11.Why Government functionaries are failed to perform their official duties and does

    not have resources to keep captive elephants in rescue centers, where as privatecustodians are abused elephants for their personnel gain and profit?

    Past incidents:

    1. Many captive elephants are being killed in road accidents in Haryana, UP and

    Delhi.

    2. Elephant was caught for begging in Sonipat and FIR was lodged, like wise FIR was

    lodged with Hodal Police Station and Dhand Police Station in Kurukshetra.

    3. Elephant was abused for pride in marriage functions at Palwal.

    4. Where are the female elephants missing from Dabhchik and Kurukshetra?

    Sincerely yours,

    Naresh Kadian,

    Volunteers of Wildlife Crime Control Bureau, MoEF,

    Rep. of UN affiliated OIPAwww.oipa.orgin India,

    Chairman, People for Animals Haryana,

    Master Trainer, AWBI,

    C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant Vihar, sector-14,

    Rohini, Delhi110085.

    http://www.oipa.org/http://www.oipa.org/http://www.oipa.org/http://www.oipa.org/
  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    4/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    5/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    6/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    7/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    8/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    9/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    10/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    11/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    12/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    13/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    14/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    15/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    16/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    17/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    18/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    19/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    20/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    21/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    22/23

  • 8/11/2019 FIR against INLD candidate Zakir Hussain with custodian of elephant and wildlife officials - Naresh Kadian

    23/23

    This female elephant missing from Haryana, required by the Special Environment Court at

    Kurukshetra because Yakub of Delhi claimed her owner and handed over to Radhey

    Shyam, who is not appearing before the Court of Law.