Upload
dharminderarora
View
33
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
FSAE
Citation preview
Finite Element Analysis of Mini Baja Frame
Ariana L. Gonzalez
April 29, 2003
MECE
Problem Statement
The Mini Baja Frame needs to withstand any collision that it might be subjected to as part of the testing process or competition.
Four impact scenarios were analyzed to ensure the frame design will not fail. Front Impact Rear Impact Side Impact Roll Over
Material Properties
The frame material is 4130 N Chromoly Steel with an outer diameter of 1.125” and wall thickness of 0.058” but was modeled as solid rods with1.125” diameter.
Elastic Modulus 29 * 10^6 psi Poisson’s Ratio .25 Yield Stress 1.16 * 10^5 psi
Pro/Engineer Model
Actual Frame Design
Calculation of Front Impact Force
Front Impact Analysis
Assumptions:
1. Vmax = 26 mph (maximum car speed)2. Mtotal = 600 lbs (total car mass including driver)3. t = 0.1 s (total time from top speed to full stop)
v = vi + at
v = final velocityvi = initial velocityt = total timea = car decceleration
vi 26mph
v 0mph
Mtotal 600 lb
t 0.1sec
av vi
t
a 381.333ft
s2
F Mtotal a
F 7.111 103 lbf
In this case, F is the total force of impact for a front collision.
Forces and Constraints
The force of 7111 lbf was divided by four and applied to the four front most points of the car (1777.75 lbf).
The rear most points of the car was constrained to prevent movement.
Finite Element Analysis of Front Impact
Close Up
Calculation of Rear Impact Force
Rear Impact Analysis
Assumptions:
1. Vmax = 33 mph (average maximum speed of other cars)2. Mtotal = 600 lbs (total car mass including driver)3. t = 0.1 s (total time from top speed to full braking)
v = vi + at
v = final velocityvi = initial velocityt = total timea = car decceleration
vi 33mph
v 0mph
Mtotal 600 lb
t 0.1sec
av vi
t
a 484ft
s2
F Mtotal a
F 9.026 103 lbf
Forces and Constraints
The force of 9026 lbf was divided by four and applied to the four rear most points of the car (2256.5 lbf).
The front most points of the car was constrained to prevent movement.
Finite Element Analysis of Rear Impact
Close Up
Finite Element Analysis of Rear Impact
Calculation of Side Impact Force
Side Impact Analysis
Assumptions:
1. Vmax = 33 mph (average maximum speed of other cars)2. Mtotal = 600 lbs (total car mass including driver)3. t = 0.1 s (total time from top speed to full braking)
v = vi + at
v = final velocityvi = initial velocityt = total timea = car decceleration
vi 33mph
v 0mph
Mtotal 600 lb
t 0.1sec
av vi
t
a 484ft
s2
F Mtotal a
F 9.026 103 lbf
Forces and Constraints
The force of 9026 lbf was divided by four and applied to the right most points of the car (2256.5 lbf).
The left most points of the car was constrained to prevent movement.
Finite Element Analysis of Side Impact
Close Up
Calculation of Roll Over Force
Roll Over Analysis
Assumptions:
1. Vmax = 26 mph (maximum speed of car)2. Mtotal = 600 lbs (total car mass including driver)3. t = 0.1 s (total time from top speed to full braking)
v = vi + at
v = final velocityvi = initial velocityt = total timea = car decceleration
vi 26mph
v 0mph
Mtotal 600 lb
t 0.1sec
av vi
t
a 381.333ft
s2
F Mtotal a
F 7.111 103 lbf
Forces and Constraints
The force of 7111 lbf was divided by two and applied to the top most points of the car (3555.50 lbf).
The bottom of the car was constrained to prevent movement.
Finite Element Analysis of Roll Over
Close Up
Alternative Design
FEA of Alternative
Close Up
Conclusions
The solid model can only be used to determine places where there is a stress concentration.
The proposed alternative reduces the stress concentration at desired location.