Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
uib.no
U N I V E R S I T Y O F B E R G E N
Fine-scale modeling of wind farm impact on ambient meteorological conditionsNils Gunnar Kvamstø, Joachim Reuder and Valerie Kumer
Met-ocean measurements and modelling for offshore wind energy, May 28, 2015Japan – Norway Energy Science Week 2015
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
University of Bergen
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
Faclty: 19, tech/adm: 16, phd/pd/sci: 50, students 100
Offer a wide range of courses in
• Meteorology
• Oceanography,
• Biogeochemistry
• Climate dynamics,
ResearchMeteorology
Physical oceanography
Climate dynamics
Biogeochemistry
Partners University of Bergen
UNI Research Ltd
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center
Institute of Marine Research
Research Groups
Co-located with the Geophysical Institute, the historical building that housed the Bergen
School of Meteorology since 1928
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
RG1: Climate model development and projections
RG2: Climate predictions from global to regional scales
RG3: Carbon cycle and biogeochemistry
RG4: Large‐scale atmosphere‐ocean dynamics
RG5: Atmosphere, cryosphere and ocean processes
RG6: Natural climate variability –extending the inst. records
RG7: Past climate dynamics ‐ from greenhouse to icehouse
The aim of the Bjerknes Centre is to understand and quantify the climate
system for the benefit of society
USA (9)
CANADA (3)
BRAZIL (1)
SWEDEN (3)FINLAND (1)
SWITZERLAND (1)DENMARK (1)
AUSTRIA (1)BELGIUM(1)
ICELAND (1)
Norway 86Germany 20China 11UK 8Russia 7USA 7 France 6Netherlands 6
rest shown on the map
180 scientists from 32 countries
uib.no
Outline
• The atmospheric boundary layer – what are wemodelling?
• Turbulence in numerical weather prediction models – a parameterisation problem
• Validation of NWP • Idealised modelling of windfarm atmosphere interaction• Closing remarks
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
The planetary boundary layer
Important parameters:
• Boundary layer height
• Strength of capping inversion
• Surface layer height
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
MABL
• Far less diurnal variation ∆θ ≈1K
• more moisture (clouds)
• closer to neutral stratification
(near surface)
The marine boundary layer (MABL)
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
Synoptic scale phenomena in troposphere matters!!
Iceland
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
To model windpark-atmosphere interaction we need to work on the weather scaleas there can be non-local causes and effects
Grid-box ∆x
– smallest resolved scale.
Sub-grid processes L< ∆x,
- must be parametrised
& ′
′
Mixing length theory classvs non-local approach
uib.no
Some examples and results
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
uib.no
A validation experiment
WRF experiments
• Integration: 1 year – 2005• BC: ERA-Interim• 5 simulations:
• YSU• ACM2• MYJ• MYNN2• QNSE
Observations• FINO1 (research platform)
• V, T measured every 10m• TKE, 40, 60, 80m• p, q, P, UV,….
(For more details see; Krogsæter and Reuder (2015), Wind Energy)
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
FINO1
uib.no
Example - validation of wind shear
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
Krogsæter, O. and Reuder, J. Wind Energy, DOI: 10.1002/we.1727, 2014.
• Relatively similar performance
• Most schemes overestimate wind
• MYJ gives best score
Important to quantify systematic errors.(For accuracy and bias correction)
uib.no
Modeling windfarm atmosphere interaction
• Large offshore wind farms are planned to increase energy production from renewable sources.
• Until now wind farms have been relatively small.• Small farms influence mainly lower part of atmospheric
boundary layer (BL).• As farms increase in size, begin to influence whole BL –
disturbance becomes regional in scale.• Most research has concentrated on local effects of
turbines and wakes – few have considered regional pressure field from large farms affecting efficiency.
• What to expect from simple models?
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
uib.no29.05.2015
Slide 3
Typical θ profile over sea
Side view
top view
- Generation of pressure gradients by wind farm:- θ in troposphere increases with height under typical stable conditions- As air lifted over farm, lower θ air brought up from below- This creates cold anomaly aloft and thus high pressure anomaly below (from hydrostatic
law) - – pressure gradients deflect wind.
MABL
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
Model wind farm as increased drag at model levels intersected by turbine blades
CT: velocity dependent drag coefficient – depends on turbineA: cross-sectional area of turbine
Add sink term to horizontal momentum equations in PBL scheme
Energy which does not go into electricity or mechanical losses goes back into the atmosphere in the form of TKE:
AUCF T2
21
FUuFx F
UvFy
3
21 UACP TKETKE
Parameterization of wind farm in NWPs
Fitch et al., 2012
uib.no
Idealised simulation of windfarm atmosphereinteraction• 2-way nested domains
– 600x600km, 3km resolution– 200x200km, 1km resolution
• Wind farm 10kmx10km– 1 turbine in each grid point– 100 turbines
• 81 vertical levels (30 below 1 km)
• ∆t=9s, 3s, T=360h• Only PBL! All other
parametrisations shut off(dry, adiabatic)
• Background: Uniform horizontal wind in x-direction
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
600km
200km
10km
10 m/s
Fitch et al., 2012
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
Some results – resolved wind
• Response in (resolved) horizontal windat hub height.
• Up to 18% reduction (relative to basicstate)
• Upstream deceleration
Vertical cross section of response in horizontalwind• Up to 18% reduction• Wake of 60-km e-folding distance• Affects capping inversion (gravity waves)
Fitch et al., 2012
uib.noUniversity of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
• TKE same extent on response as on resolved wind• Up to 7 times increase of TKE within wind warm• Analysis of different terms in momentum equation
shows that both gravity waves and vertical transport is active
Fitch et al., 2012
TKE
uib.no
Geometry of power output
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
Fitch et al., 2012
Fractional power output for each turbine.(Power for each turbine divided by the maximum power output of a turbine in the wind farm)
100 turbines in a regular 1km x1 km grid
uib.no
Closing remarks
• Models as a numerical laboratory is a powerful tool– Response, interactions between farms– Sensitivity to design, layout etc– Sensitivity to individual processes– Estimation of extremes
• Important to validate models with observarions– Accuracy– Bias correction– Detect weak and strong abilities– Further development
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
uib.no
Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer (MABL)
University of Bergen
Geophysical Institute, Faculty of mathematics and natural sciences
Source: http://www.ieawind.org/GWEC_PDF/GWEC%20Annex23.pdf
Challenge:
Include coupling to ocean