37
Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS Proposal Name Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District Community College District Grossmont College College or Center August 1, 2018 Date A P x W x C x E x Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 Community College Construction Act of 1980 Capital Outlay Budget Change Proposal

Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Liberal Arts/Business/CSISProposal Name

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College DistrictCommunity College District

Grossmont CollegeCollege or Center

August 1, 2018Date

A P x W x C x E x

Final Project Proposal

2020-2021Community College Construction Act of 1980

Capital Outlay Budget Change Proposal

Page 2: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College DistrictCollege: Grossmont CollegeProject: Liberal Arts/Business/CSISPrepared by: Gensler Date:

Section Description Status Date1.1 Title Page Complete 3/7/20182.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist Complete 6/12/20183.1 Approval Page - Final Project Proposal (with original signatures) Complete 3/7/20183.2 Project Terms and Conditions Complete 3/7/20184.1 Analysis of Building Space Use and WSCH - JCAF 31 Complete 6/7/20185.1 Cost Estimate Summary - JCAF 32 Complete 6/8/20185.2 Quantities and Unit Costs supporting the JCAF 32 Complete 6/8/2018

(Insert the optional cost analyses into this section.)

6.1 California Energy Commission Approved Audit Complete 6/8/2018Responses to Specific Requirements -- State Administrative Manual Complete 6/13/2018(Also provide this section electronically in Word 6. Version) Complete 6/13/2018

8.1 California Environmental Quality Act: Environmental Impact Report or Exemption Notice Complete 6/8/2018

9.1 Analysis of Future Costs Complete10.1 Campus Plot Plan Complete 6/8/201810.2 Diagrams of Building Areas (include floor plans with building areas affected.)

(Insert half-sized scaled conceptual drawings into the FPP.) Complete 6/8/201810.3 Site Plans Complete 6/8/201810.4 Floor Plans Complete 6/8/201810.5 Exterior Elevations Complete 6/8/201811.1 Guideline-Based Group II Equipment Cost Estimates - JCAF 33 Complete 6/7/201812.1 Justification of Additional Costs exceeding Guidelines (as needed) Complete 6/8/201813.1 Detailed Equipment List Complete 6/7/2018

2.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist

August 1, 2018

7.1

Page 3: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD
Page 4: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

3.2 PROJECT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District College:

Budget Year: 2020-2021

1

2a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

3a.

b.

c.

4a.

b.

c.

The applicant hereby requests State funds in the amount prescribed by law for the project named herein. All parts andexhibits contained in or referred to in this application are submitted with and made part of this application.

The applicant hereby assures the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges that:Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001.5 of Title 5 no part of this application includes a request forfunding the planning or construction of dormitories, stadia, the improvement of sites for student or staffparking, single purpose auditoriums or student centers other than cafeterias. The facilities included in theproposed project will be used for one or more of the purposes authorized in 57001.5 of Title 5.Any State funds received pursuant to this application shall be used solely for defraying the development costsof the proposed project.

District: Grossmont College

Project: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS

Architectural or engineering supervision and inspection will be provided at the construction site to ensure thatthe work was completed in compliance with the provisions of Section 81130 of the Education Code and that itconforms with the approved plans and specifications.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the Budget Act , no contract will be awarded prior to the allocationof funds to the Board of Governors by the Public Works Board.

It is understood by the applicant that:No claim against any funds awarded on this application shall be approved which is for work or materials not apart of the project presented in this application as it will be finally allocated by the Public Works Board.

If the application is approved, the construction covered by the application shall be undertaken in aneconomical manner and will not be of elaborate or extravagant design or materials.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 81837 of the Education Code , approval of the final plans andspecifications for construction will be obtained from the Board of Governors of the California CommunityColleges before any contract is let for the construction.

No changes in construction plans or specifications made after approval of final plans which would alter thescope of work, function assignable and/or gross areas, utilities, or safety of the facility will be made withoutprior approval of the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges and the Department ofGeneral Services Division of the State Architect.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001 of Title 5, an adequate and separate accounting and fiscal recordsand accounts of all funds received from any source to pay the cost of the proposed construction will bemaintained, and audit of such records and accounts will be permitted at any reasonable time, during theproject, at the completion of the project, or both.

The appropriation is made only to fund the project presented in this application, as it is finally approved,regardless of whether the actual cost is less than or equals the appropriation.A reduction in the scope of the project or assignable areas shall result in a proportionate reduction in the funds available from the appropriation.

The failure to abide by each of the assurances made herein entitles the Board of Governors of the CaliforniaCommunity Colleges to withhold all or some portion of any funds awarded on this application.

Any fraudulent statement which materially affects any substantial portion of the project presented in thisapplication, as it may be finally approved, entitles the Board of Governors of the California CommunityColleges to terminate this application or payment of any funds awarded on the project presented in thisapplication.

It is further understood that:The appropriation which may be made for the project presented in this application does not make an absolutegrant of that amount to the applicant.

Page 5: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

* Indicates manual override

JCAF 31- Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Grossmont College/Grossmont-Cuyamaca CCD) (Official) CCI: 6596 D (12/17) Reconst.

Rm. Type Description

TOP No. Department No. Rms No. Sta Room No. ASF

WSCH Capacity Sec. ASF

Increase In Space

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment Bldg 52 -16,802 -7,208 -7,208

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment Bldg 55 -24,065 -10,324 -10,324

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 14,636 34,117 14,636

210 Class Lab 0701 Information Technology, General 4,424 2,587 4,424

210 Class Lab 0701 Information Technology, General Bldg 52 -2,918 -4,989 -4,989

310 Office 0099 General Assignment Bldg 52 -128 -128

310 Office 0099 General Assignment Bldg 55 -122 -122

310 Office 0099 General Assignment 362 362

410 Read/Study Room 6120 Library 1,980 1,980

530 Audio/Visual, Radio, TV 6130 Media Services 1,263 1,263

535 A/V, Radio, TV Service 6130 Media Services Bldg 55 -90 -90

715 DP/Computer Service 6780 Management Information Services 240 240

Totals: 22,905 -7,081 -22,861 44

CFIS #: 40.19.XXX

Page 6: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY AND ANTICIPATED TIME SCHEDULE - JCAF 32: To Q&UC Print Save Reset Delete District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District College: Grossmont College CFIS Ref. #: 40.19.XXX

Project Name: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Official) Date Prepared: 6/7/2018 Estimate CCI: 6596 DoF Project ID: null Request For: L P W C E Round to Thousands: Escalation View: Estimate Estimate EPI: 3560 Prepared by: Gensler

Total Cost State Funded District FundedState-Supportable Non State-Supportable

1. Site Acquisition Acres: 2. Preliminary Plans Estimate CCI: 6596 $799,405 50.00% $399,703 50.00% $399,702 A. Architectural Fees (for preliminary plans) $486,737 B. Project Management (for preliminary plans) $139,068 C. Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fee D. Preliminary Tests (soils, hazardous materials) $58,600 E. Other Costs (for preliminary plans) $115,0003. Working Drawings Estimate CCI: 6596 $825,636 50.00% $412,819 50.00% $412,817 A. Architectural Fees (for working drawings) $556,271 B. Project Management (for working drawings) C. Division of the State Architect, Plan Check Fee $179,632 D. Community College Plan Check Fee $39,733 E. Other Costs (for working drawings) $50,000(Total PW may not exceed 13% of construction) True4. Construction Estimate CCI: 6596 $13,906,776 50.99% $7,091,113 49.01% $6,815,663 A. Utility Service $623,168 B. Site Development, Service $1,769,997 C. Site Development, General $563,639 D. Other Site Development $0 E. Reconstruction $10,631,041 F. New Construction (building) (w/Group I equip) G. Board of Governor's Energy Policy Allowance (2% or 3%) $318,931 H. Other5. Contingency $973,474 50.05% $487,237 49.95% $486,2376. Architectural and Engineering Oversight $347,669 50.00% $173,835 50.00% $173,8347. Tests and Inspections $421,014 50.12% $211,007 49.88% $210,007 A. Tests $139,068 B. Inspections $281,9468. Construction Management & Labor Compliance Program (if justified) $300,423 50.00% $150,212 50.00% $150,211 A. Construction Management $278,136 B. Labor Compliance Program $22,2879. Total Construction Costs (items 4 through 8 above) $15,949,356 $8,113,404 $7,835,952 $010. Furniture and Group II Equipment Estimate EPI: 3560 $274,625 0.00% 100.00% $274,62511. Total Project Cost (items 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10) $17,849,022 $8,925,926 $8,923,096 $0

12. Project DataOutside

GSFAssignableSquare Feet

RatioASF/GSF

Unit CostPer ASF

Unit CostPer GSF 14. State Funded

District Funded District FundedTotalSupportable Non Supportable

Construction Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 Reconstruction 31,933 22,905 0.72 $464 $333 Preliminary Plans $399,703 $399,702 $0 $399,702

13. Anticipated Time Schedule Working Drawings $412,819 $412,817 $0 $412,817 Start Preliminary Plans 8/1/2020 Advertise Bid for Construction 6/1/2022 Construction $8,113,404 $7,835,952 $0 $7,835,952 Start Working Drawings 2/1/2021 Award Construction Contract 8/1/2022 Equipment $0 $274,625 $0 $274,625 Complete Working Drawings 8/1/2021 Advertise Bid for Equipment 6/1/2023 Total Costs $8,925,926 $8,923,096 $0 $8,923,096 DSA Final Approval 4/1/2022 Complete Project 4/1/2024 % of SS Total 50.01% 49.99% SS Total: $17,849,022

Page 7: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

QUANTITIES AND UNIT COSTS SUPPORTING THE JCAF 32(Project Cost Estimate)

District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District CFIS Ref. #: 40.19.XXX View Cost Escalations

Budget

Mid Point

College: Grossmont College Estimate CCI: 6596 DoF Project ID:Project Name: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Official) Estimate EPI: 3560 Prepared By: Gensler Date: 6/7/2018 Budget CCI: 6596 Mo. Escalation Factor: 0.0042

Request For: L P W C E Budget EPI: 3560 Estimate

1. SITE ACQUISITION [Edit]

Acres: TOTAL SITE ACQUISITION COSTS: $0

2. PRELIMINARY PLANS 6596 A. Architectural Fees (for Preliminary Plans)

New Construction $0 x 8.0% x 35.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 10.0% x 35.0% $486,737

Total Architectural Fees: $486,737

B. Project Management (for Preliminary Plans) Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 1.0% $139,068

Total Project Management Fees: $139,068

C. Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fee

1. Structural Safety Fee Tier 1 Amt $0 x 1.25% $0 Tier 2 Amt $0 x 1% $0

$02. Fire, Life Safety Fee

Tier 1 Amt $0 x 0.3% $0 Tier 2 Amt $0 x 0.2% $0 Tier 3 Amt $0 x 0.1% $0 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.05% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.01% $0

$03. Access Compliance Fee

Tier 1 Amt $0 x 0.5% $0 Tier 2 Amt $0 x 0.25% $0 Tier 3 Amt $0 x 0.1% $0 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.08% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.06% $0 Tier 6 Amt $0 x 0.04% $0

$0Total Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fees: $0

D. Preliminary Test (Soils Tests & Geotechnical Report)

[Edit] Description Amount Non Supportable

California Geologic Hazard Fee $3,600

Hazardous Materials Survey $15,000

Structural Survey $20,000CEQA (Environmental Documents) $20,000

Total Preliminary Tests: $58,600E. Other Costs (Special Consultants, Printing, Legal, Etc.)

[Edit] Description Amount Non Supportable

Hazardous Substance Consultant $20,000

Waterproofing Consultant $30,000Constructability Review Consultant $40,000

SWPPP Consultant $25,000Total Other Costs: $115,000

TOTAL PRELIMINARY PLANS COSTS: $799,4053. WORKING DRAWINGS 6596

A. Architectural Fees (for Working Drawings)

Allocate to PP

Allocate to PP

Page 8: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

New Construction $0 x 8.0% x 40.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 10.0% x 40.0% $556,271

Total Architectural Fees: $556,271

B. Project Management (for Working Drawings) Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 1.0% $0

Total Project Management Fees: $0

C. Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fee

1. Structural Safety Fee Tier 1 Amt $1,000,000 x 1.25% $12,500 Tier 2 Amt $12,906,776 x 1% $129,068

$141,5682. Fire, Life Safety Fee

Tier 1 Amt $1,000,000 x 0.3% $3,000 Tier 2 Amt $4,000,000 x 0.2% $8,000 Tier 3 Amt $8,906,776 x 0.1% $8,907 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.05% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.01% $0

$19,9073. Access Compliance Fee

Tier 1 Amt $500,000 x 0.5% $2,500 Tier 2 Amt $1,500,000 x 0.25% $3,750 Tier 3 Amt $11,906,776 x 0.1% $11,907 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.08% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.06% $0 Tier 6 Amt $0 x 0.04% $0

$18,157Total Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fees: $179,632

D. Community Colleges Plan Check Fees (2/7 of 1% of Construction Cost) Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 0.28571 x 1.0% $39,733

Total Community Colleges Plan Check Fee: $39,733E. Other Costs (Special Consultants, Printing, Legal, Etc.)

[Edit] Description Amount Non Supportable

Printing and Advertising $20,000

Legal Fees $10,000

Local Permit Costs $20,000Total Other Costs: $50,000

Total PW may not exceed 13% of Construction 10.2% TOTAL WORKING DRAWINGS COSTS: $825,636

4. CONSTRUCTION 6596 A. Utility Service

[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal

01 General RequirementsTemporary Utilities

Temporary ElectricityTemporary electrical power equipment (pro-rated per job), connections, compressor or pump, 100 amp

1 Ea. x $549.36 $549.36

Temporary electrical power equipment (pro-rated per job), connections, office trailer, 100 amp

1 Ea. x $770.15 $770.15

Temporary Power, lighting, incl. service lamps, wiring and outlets, max

380 CSF Flr x $77.92 $29,609.60

$30,92926 Electrical

Common Work Results For ElectricalMedium-Voltage CablesCable terminations, outdoor systems, 15 kV, 2/0 solid to 350 kcmil stranded

12 Ea. x $870.08 $10,440.96

Allocate to WD

Allocate to WD

Page 9: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Medium-cable single cable, copper, XLP shielding, ungrounded neutral, 15 kV, 500 kcmil, in conduit, excl splicing & terminations

6 C.L.F. x $1,947.13 $11,682.78

Control-Voltage Electrical Power CablesControl cable, copper, THHN wire with PVC jacket, 600 V, 22 wires, #14

6 C.L.F. x $779.35 $4,676.10

Grounding And Bonding For Electrical SystemsInsulated ground wire, copper, stranded, 500 kcmil 4 C.L.F. x $2,354.79 $9,419.16

Exothermic weld, 4/0 wire to 1" ground rod 8 Ea. x $175.78 $1,406.24

Ground wire, copper wire, bare stranded, 3/0 10 C.L.F. x $1,458.71 $14,587.10

Grounding connection, brazed, #2 wire 10 Ea. x $48.02 $480.20

Grounding drive studs, 5/8" diameter 10 Ea. x $27.01 $270.10

Medium-Voltage TransformersPad-Mounted, Liquid-Filled, Medium-Voltage TransformersTransformer, liquid-filled, 5 kV or 15 kV primary, 277/480 V secondary, 3 phase, 1500 kVA, pad mounted

2 Ea. x $85,194.43$170,388.86

Exterior LightingLighting Poles And StandardsLight poles, anchor base, aluminum, 10' high, excl concrete bases

10 Ea. x $1,720.83 $17,208.30

Roadway LightingRoadway area luminaire, LED fixture, 252 LEDS, 120 V AC or 12 V DC, equal to 210 watt, incl lamp

4 Ea. x $2,807.75 $11,231.00

Area LightingInduction fixture, exterior, wall pack, 80 watt, incl lamps

10 Ea. x $1,404.03 $14,040.30

Walkway LightingBollard light, exterior, high w/ polycarbonate lens, high pressure sodium, 100 Watt, 42" high, incl ballast and lamp

10 Ea. x $1,947.10 $19,471.00

$285,30227 Communications

Communications Horizontal CablingCommunications Copper Horizontal CablingMultipair cable, unshielded non-plenum, 150 V PVC jacket, #22, 15 pair

2 C.L.F. x $543.75 $1,087.50

Unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cable, solid, plenum, #24, 4 pair, category 6

3 C.L.F. x $208.44 $625.32

Communications Coaxial Horizontal CablingCoaxial cable, fire rated, 93 ohm, RG A/U #62 cable 3 C.L.F. x $351.52 $1,054.56

$2,76733 Utilities

Common Work Results For UtilitiesUtility StructuresUtility structures, utility vaults precast concrete, 5' x 10' x 6' high, I.D., 6" thick, excludes excavation and backfill

2 Ea. x $9,061.05 $18,122.10

Water Utility Distribution PipingPublic Water Utility Distribution PipingWater supply distribution piping, fitting, 90 degree elbow, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", includes gaskets

10 Ea. x $543.37 $5,433.70

Page 10: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Water supply distribution piping, fitting, 90 degree elbow, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", includes gaskets

10 Ea. x $27.18 $271.80

Water supply distribution piping, fitting, coupling, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, includes gaskets

5 Ea. x $231.98 $1,159.90

Water supply distribution piping, fitting, coupling, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, includes gaskets

5 Ea. x $429.28 $2,146.40

Water supply distribution piping, fitting, tee, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", includes gaskets

3 Ea. x $369.64 $1,108.92

Water supply distribution piping, fitting, tee, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", includes gaskets

3 Ea. x $896.75 $2,690.25

Water supply distribution piping, piping polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, excludes excavation or backfill

240 L.F. x $33.16 $7,958.40

Water supply distribution piping, piping polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, excludes excavation or backfill

240 L.F. x $2.10 $504.00

Water Utility Distribution EquipmentWater Service ConnectionsWater Service Connection, tapping sleeves with rubber gaskets, 10" x 4", excludes excavation and backfill

3 Ea. x $2,763.02 $8,289.06

Water Service Connection, tapping sleeves with rubber gaskets, 10" x 6", excludes excavation and backfill

3 Ea. x $3,442.94 $10,328.82

Water Utility Distribution ValvesWater Utility distribution Valves, check valves, flanged cast iron, 4" diameter, includes bolts and gaskets

5 Ea. x $2,852.90 $14,264.50

Water Utility distribution Valves, check valves, flanged cast iron, 6" diameter, includes bolts and gaskets

5 Ea. x $13,042.77 $65,213.85

Water Utility distribution Valves, sleeve for tapping mains, 10" x 6", excludes excavation and backfill, add

4 Ea. x $3,034.00 $12,136.00

Water Utility distribution Valves, gate valve, O.S.&Y., with rubber gaskets, 6" diameter, excludes excavation and backfill

4 Ea. x $2,264.22 $9,056.88

Water Utility Distribution Fire HydrantsWater Utility Distribution Fire Hydrants, indicator post, adjustable valve size, 4" -14", 14'-0" bury, includes bolts and gaskets, excludes excavation and backfill

3 Ea. x $2,671.57 $8,014.71

Storm Utility Drainage PipingPublic Storm Utility Drainage Piping

Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, 90 degree bends or elbows, corrugated metal

Page 11: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 8" diameter, 16 ga.

8 Ea. x $473.06 $3,784.48

Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, 90 degree bends or elbows, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 10" diameter, 16 ga.

8 Ea. x $570.90 $4,567.20

Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 20' lengths, 16 ga., 10" diameter, excludes excavation and backfill

240 L.F. x $54.36 $13,046.40

Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 20' lengths, 16 ga., 8" diameter, excludes excavation and backfill

240 L.F. x $69.78 $16,747.20

Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, end sections, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 10" diameter, 16 ga., excludes excavation and backfill

3 Ea. x $552.55 $1,657.65

Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, end sections, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 8" diameter, 16 ga., excludes excavation and backfill

3 Ea. x $299.03 $897.09

Storm Drainage StructuresStorm Drainage Manholes, Frames, And CoversStorm Drainage Manholes, Frames, and Covers, concrete block, radial, 6' deep, 4' inside diameter, excludes footing, excavation, backfill, frame and cover

3 Ea. x $3,758.65 $11,275.95

Hydronic Energy DistributionUnderground Hydronic Energy DistributionUnderground Hydronic Energy Distribution, pipe conduit prefabricated, polyurethane insulated system, black steel service pipe, std. wt. 1/2" Insulation, 250 degree F. maximum temperature, 3" diam. pipe size, excludes trenching, fittings or crane

240 L.F. x $164.84 $39,561.60

Electrical Utility Transmission And DistributionElectrical Underground Ducts And ManholesElectrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, PVC, elbows, 4" diameter, schedule 40, installed by direct burial in slab or duct bank

10 Ea. x $231.96 $2,319.60

Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, hand holes, precast concrete, with concrete cover, 2' x 2' x 3' deep, excludes excavation, backfill and cast in place concrete

4 Ea. x $2,627.25 $10,509.00

Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, man holes, precast w/iron racks

Page 12: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

& pulling irons, C.I. frame and cover, 4' x 6' x 7' deep, excludes excavation, backfill and cast in place concrete

2 Ea. x $14,084.85 $28,169.70

Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, underground duct banks ready for concrete fill, PVC, type EB, 1 @ 4" diameter, excludes excavation, backfill and cast in place concrete

240 L.F. x $10.78 $2,587.20

Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, underground duct banks, PVC, fittings, type EB expansion joint, 4" diameter

5 Ea. x $362.44 $1,812.20

Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, PVC, base spacer, 4" diameter, schedule 40, installed by direct burial in slab or duct bank

3 Ea. x $33.25 $99.75

Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, PVC, bell end and cap, 4" diameter, schedule 40, installed by direct burial in slab or duct bank

3 Ea. x $144.92 $434.76

$304,169Total Utility Service: $623,168

B. Site Development - Service

[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal

02 Existing ConditionsDemolition

Selective Site DemolitionMinor site demolition, abandon existing catch basin or manhole, excludes hauling

2 Ea. x $460.24 $920.48

Minor site demolition, pipe, sewer/water, 12" diameter, remove, excludes excavation, hauling

235 L.F. x $18.40 $4,324.00

Minor site demolition, pipe, sewer/water, steel, welded connections, 10" diameter, remove, excludes excavation, hauling

235 L.F. x $39.86 $9,367.10

Minor site demolition, pipe, sewer/water, steel, welded connections, 4" diameter, remove, excludes excavation, hauling

235 L.F. x $20.12 $4,728.20

Structure DemolitionBuilding demolition, large urban projects, concrete, includes 20 mile haul, excludes foundation demolition, dump fees

680000 C.F. x $0.83 $564,400.00

Bldg. footings and foundations demolition, floors, concrete slab on grade, plain concrete, 6" thick, excludes disposal costs and dump fees

45000 S.F. x $11.69 $526,050.00

Selective DemolitionSelective demolition, rubbish handling, loading & trucking, machine loading truck, includes 2 mile haul, cost to be added to demolition cost.

13840 C.Y. x $38.95 $539,068.00

$1,648,85831 Earthwork

Earth Stripping And StockpilingSoil Stripping And Stockpiling

Topsoil stripping and stockpiling, loam or topsoil,

Page 13: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

remove and stockpile on site, 200 HP dozer, 6" deep, 200' haul per S.Y.

2300 S.Y. x $0.76 $1,748.00

GradingFine GradingFine grading, fine grade for slab on grade, machine 2300 S.Y. x $2.92 $6,716.00

Excavation And FillExcavationExcavating, trench backfill, 2-1/4 C.Y. bucket, 100' haul, front end loader, wheel mounted, excludes dewatering

450 L.C.Y. x $7.83 $3,523.50

Excavating, chain trencher, utility trench, common earth, 8" wide, 36" deep, backfill by hand, includes compaction, add

1875 L.F. x $6.54 $12,262.50

FillFill by borrow and utility bedding, borrow, for embankments, 1 mile haul, spread, by dozer

120 L.C.Y. x $35.33 $4,239.60

Backfill, 12" layers, compaction in layers, roller compaction with operator walking, add to above

750 E.C.Y. x $11.68 $8,760.00

Erosion And Sedimentation ControlsStabilization Measures For Erosion And Sedimentation ControlSynthetic erosion control, hay bales, staked 3000 L.F. x $22.20 $66,600.00

Synthetic erosion control, place and remove hay bales 12 Ton x $1,440.79 $17,289.48

$121,139Total Site Development - Service: $1,769,997

C. Site Development - General

[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal

01 General RequirementsConstruction Aids

Equipment MobilizationMobilization or demobilization, dozer, loader, backhoe or excavator, above 150 H.P., up to 50 miles

5 Ea. x $824.50 $4,122.50

Mobilization or demobilization, scraper, self-propelled, 24 C.Y. capacity, up to 50 miles

5 Ea. x $1,231.69 $6,158.45

Temporary Barriers And EnclosuresTemporary FencingTemporary Fencing, chain link, rented up to 12 months, 6' high, 11 ga, over 1000'

3000 L.F. x $11.78 $35,340.00

$45,62103 Concrete

Cast-In-Place ConcreteMiscellaneous Cast-In-Place ConcreteStructural concrete, in place, handicap access ramp (4000 psi), railing both sides, 3' wide, includes forms(4 uses), reinforcing steel, concrete, placing and finishing

120 L.F. x $1,005.90 $120,708.00

$120,70810 Specialties

DirectoriesBuilding DirectoriesDirectory boards, outdoor, weatherproof, black plastic, 36" x 36"

5 Ea. x $3,079.66 $15,398.30

Signage

Page 14: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Dimensional Letter SignageSigns, reflective aluminum street type, double faced, 4-way, includes bracket

3 Ea. x $525.24 $1,575.72

$16,97412 Furnishings

Site FurnishingsManufactured PlantersPlanters, precast concrete, fluted, 7' diameter, 36" high 7 Ea. x $2,989.40 $20,925.80

$20,92632 Exterior Improvements

Schedules For Exterior ImprovementsSchedules For Bases, Ballasts, And PavingSidewalks, driveways, and patios, sidewalk, crushed stone, white marble, 1" thick, excludes base

20000 S.F. x $17.58 $351,600.00

Base CoursesAggregate Base CoursesBase course drainage layers, prepare and roll sub-base, small areas to 2500 S.Y.

2200 S.Y. x $3.55 $7,810.00

$359,410.00Total Site Development - General: $563,639

D. Other Site Development

[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal

Total Other Site Development: $0E. Reconstruction (from JCAF31)

Rm. Type TOP ASF Cost Per ASF Allowance

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 0 x $546 $0

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 0 x $546 $0

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 14,636 x $546 $7,991,256

210 Class Lab0701 Information Technology, General

0 x $879 $0

210 Class Lab0701 Information Technology, General

4,424 x $879 $3,888,696

310 Office 0099 General Assignment 0 x $576 $0

310 Office 0099 General Assignment 0 x $576 $0

310 Office 0099 General Assignment 362 x $576 $208,512

410 Read/Study Room 6120 Library 1,980 x $424 $839,520

530 Audio/Visual, Radio, TV 6130 Media Services 1,263 x $879 $1,110,177

535 A/V, Radio, TV Service 6130 Media Services 0 x $879 $0

715 DP/Computer Service6780 Management Information Services

240 x $569 $136,560

Reconstruction Adjustment: 75% Total: $10,631,041Non Supportable Amt: $0

Total Reconstruction: $10,631,041F. New Construction (from JCAF31)

Rm. Type TOP ASF Cost Per ASF Allowance

Total: $0Non Supportable Amt: $0

Total New Construction: $0G. Board of Governors Energy Policy Allowance

2% of New Building Costs $0 x 2.0% $0 3% of Renovated Building Costs $10,631,041 x 3.0% $318,931

Total Board of Governors Energy Policy Allowance: $318,931H. Other

Non

Page 15: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

[Edit] Description Amount SupportableTotal Other Costs: $0

Total Contract Costs: $13,906,7765. Contingency

New Construction $0 x 5.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 7.0% $973,474

Total Contingency: $973,4746. Architectural and Engineering Oversight

New Construction $0 x 8.0% x 25.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 10.0% x 25.0% $347,669

Total Architectural and Engineering Oversight: $347,6697. TESTS AND INSPECTIONS

A. Tests Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 1.0% $139,068

B. DSA Inspections Construction Months 21 x $13,426 $281,946

Total Tests and Inspections Costs: $421,0148. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & LABOR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM

A. Construction Management Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 2.0% $278,136

B. Labor Compliance Program (.25% of state project costs) State Project Cost $8,914,782 x 0.25% $22,287

Total Construction Mgt & Labor Compliance Costs: $300,4239. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION (Items 4 through 8)

Total Construction Costs: $15,949,35610.FURNITURE AND GROUP II EQUIPMENT (from JCAF33) 3560

Total Supportable Cost (from JCAF33): $274,625Non Supportable Amt: $0

Total Furniture and Group II Equipment Costs: $274,62511.TOTAL PROJECT COST

Total Project Costs: $17,849,022

12. Project DataOutside

GSFAssignableSquare Feet

RatioASF/GSF

Unit CostPer ASF

Unit CostPer GSF

Construction 0 0 Reconstruction 31,933 22,905 0.72 $619 $333

13. Anticipated Time Schedule Start Preliminary Plans 8/1/2020 Advertise Bid for

Construction 6/1/2022

Start Working Drawings 2/1/2021 Award Construction

Contract 8/1/2022

Complete Working Drawings 8/1/2021 Advertise Bid for

Equipment 6/1/2023

DSA Final Approval 4/1/2022 Complete Project 4/1/2024

Page 16: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

6.1 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION APPROVED AUDIT

This project will be designed to exceed Title 24, Part 6 Energy Code by 10%, consistent with theBoard of Governors Energy and Sustainability policy. The design should incorporates sustainablegoals for site, energy efficiency, water use reduction, storm water management, occupant health aswell as minimizing the buildings impact on the environment both by design and construction.Strategies will consider:• Natural and native planting materials will be incorporated around the building to minimize, if noteliminate, the irrigation demand.• Concrete walkways will be minimized to reduce storm water runoff and promote natural filtrationinto the soil as well as a reduction in the heat island effect.• Overhangs have been incorporated to shade glazing.• Low E dual glazing will be incorporated to reduce heat gain.• Roofing will incorporate cool roofing to reduce the heat island effect and heat gain.• Heating and cooling will be provided by a highly energy efficient HVAC system.• Independent HVAC controls provided where applicable.• Natural lighting will be incorporated into most spaces.• Energy saving lighting with automatic lighting controls and sensors.• Interior materials will be low in volatile organic compounds, high in recycled content.• Water efficient fixtures, faucets and devices will be incorporated.• A strict recycling program will be required during construction.• Requested participation in the local utility’s energy incentive program.• Photovoltaic panels will be incorporated where appropriate.

• Durable systems and finishes with long life cycles that minimize maintenance and replacement.• Optimization of indoor environmental quality for occupants with high efficiency industrialventilation.• Utilization of environmentally preferable products and processes, such as recycled content materialsand recyclable materials.• Procedures that monitor, trend and report operational performance as compared to the optimaldesign and operating parameters to the campus' central energy management system.

• Space provided in each building to support an active program for recycling and reuse of materials.

Page 17: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Capital Outlay Budget Change Proposal (COBCP) - Cover Sheet DF-151 (REV 06/17)

Fiscal Year 2020-21

Business Unit 6870

Department Board of Governors, California Community Colleges

Priority No.

Budget Request Name 6870-301-COBCO-2020-XX

Capital Outlay Program ID 5680

Capital Outlay Project ID (7 digits. For new projects leave blank)

Project Title Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont College: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS

Project Status and Type Status: New Continuing Type: Major Minor

Project Category (Select one) CRI (Critical Infrastructure) WSD (Workload Space Deficiencies) ECP (Enrollment Caseload Population) SM (Seismic)

FLS (Fire Life Safety) FM (Facility Modernization) PAR (Public Access Recreation) RC (Resource Conservation)

Total Request (in thousands) $1,626

Phase(s) to be Funded PW

Estimated Total Project Cost (in thousands) $17,850

Budget Request Summary The Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS project on Grossmont College in the Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District includes the renovation of buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and the reconstruction of 31,933 gross square feet and 22,905 assignable square feet (ASF) comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space for the Liberal Arts, Computer Science Information Systems, and Business programs.

Requires Legislation Yes No

Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed

CCCI 6596

Requires Provisional Language Yes No

Budget Package Status Needed Not Needed Existing

Impact on Support Budget One-Time Costs Yes No Future Costs Yes No Future Savings Yes No Revenue Yes No

If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? Yes No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee.

Prepared By

Date

Reviewed By

Date

Department Director

Date

Agency Secretary

Date

Department of Finance Use Only Principal Program Budget Analyst

Date submitted to the Legislature

Page 18: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

2

A. Purpose of the Project:

Problem Statement The Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS project on Grossmont College in the Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District includes the renovation of buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and the reconstruction of 31,933 gross square feet (GSF) and 22,905 assignable square feet (ASF) comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space for the Liberal Arts, Computer Science Information Systems (CSIS), and Business programs.

Grossmont College in El Cajon is one of the two colleges in the Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District. Established in 1960, the College serves over 18,000 students. The Liberal Arts Quad Complex is a tight cluster of five buildings that house the Liberal Arts, CSIS, and Business programs’ learning spaces (lecture and labs), faculty offices, and support spaces. Two of these five buildings, 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), constructed in 1964 and 1967, respectively, cannot meet current teaching and learning modalities to best prepare students for success. Specifically: • Both buildings lack flexible learning spaces – hard walls limit the instructors and students abilities

to teach and learn. Progressively, theory and application are blended together, often sharing the same learning spaces to facilitate learning. Inflexible spaces also hinder class sizes, and restrict the ability to teach a variety of different courses. The non-flexible spaces also do not allow for maximum space utilization.

• Existing spaces lack technology – learning tools, such as fixed whiteboards and stationary student stations, do not support modern teaching modalities. Instructional spaces and student learning stations need to support multi-visual and evolving instruction to prepare students. This is especially critical in technical programs such as Computer Science Information Systems (CSIS).

• Current space configurations do not promote collaboration amongst related programs. Student

spaces are not close to faculty spaces for collaboration and related program faculty don’t have adjacencies for streamlined communications.

• There are no small group learning spaces in either building to facilitate learning. Modern

instructional modalities combine small student groups with faculty coaching to solve complex problems and complete projects. Students currently meet elsewhere and don’t benefit from having faculty in close proximity.

Solution Criteria To mitigate these problems, the campus seeks a solution that meets the following criteria:

• Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote collaboration and

communication; • Provides small group learning spaces in close proximity to faculty offices; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building

codes;

Page 19: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

3

• Is a permanent on-campus solution that does not adversely impact campus’ operational budget or create a transportation hardship for students; and

• Is consistent with the mission the campus’ strategic plan.

B. Relationship to the Strategic Plan:

The College, guided by the District’s 2016-2022 strategic plan and 2013 facilities master plan, is committed to student success. Instructional programs, resources, and strategies are focused on students meeting their educational goals on a timely basis and succeed in their next steps. The strategic and master plans also guide the College in creating and maintaining a campus that is environmentally responsible and sustainable. The campus does not have any known life and safety projects and this project represents the site’s highest state-funded priority.

C. Alternatives: In considering alternatives, the College analyzed options that will meet the primary needs of the campus’ educational and facilities master plans. Alternatives to this project include: • Alternative #1 – Renovate Existing Buildings • Alternative #2 - Lease off-site facilities • Alternative #3 - Acquire temporary modulars on campus Alternative #1 – Renovate Existing Buildings Renovate buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and reconstruct with of 31,933 GSF and 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space. The estimated cost of this alternative at CCI 6596 and EPI 3560 is $17,850,000. Pros: • Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote collaboration and

communication; • Provides small group learning spaces with close proximity to faculty; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building

codes; • Is a permanent on-campus solution that does not adversely impact campus’ operational budget or

create a transportation hardship for students; • Is consistent with the mission the campus’ strategic plan; and • Is the least cost solution.

Cons: • Possible disruption of current programming during construction.

Page 20: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

4

Alternative #2 – Lease off-site facilities This alternative requires a long-term lease, comprised of 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space The estimated cost of this alternative at CCI 6596 and EPI 3560 is $37,385,000. The rented space provides adequate parking and security services, and the leased building spaces require the approval of the Division of the State Architect.

Pros: • Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides small group learning spaces; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building

codes; Cons: • Does not provide learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote

collaboration and communication; • Is not a permanent on-campus solution that does not adversely impact campus’ operational

budget or create a transportation hardship for students; • While this option provides small group learning spaces, not all program related faculty may be

accessible on leased site; • Is inconsistent with the campus’ strategic plan; and • Is not the least cost solution.

Alternative #3 – Acquire temporary modulars on campus This alternative provides space in temporary modulars with 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space. The estimated cost of this alternative at CCI 6596 and EPI 3560 is $26,922,000.

Pros: • Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides small group learning spaces; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building

codes; Cons: • Does not provide learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote

collaboration and communication; • While this option provides small group learning spaces, not all faculty may be easily accessible

with program space scattered on campus; • Is not a permanent on-campus solution; • Adversely impacts campus’ operational budget; • Is inconsistent with the campus’ strategic plan; and • Is not the least cost solution.

Page 21: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

5

Solution Criteria Matrix

CRITERIA

Alternative #1 Renovate Existing

Buildings

Alternative #2 Lease Off-Site

Facilities

Alternative #3 Acquire

Temporary Modulars

Provides flexible spaces that support program teaching methodologies

Yes Yes Yes

Provides spaces that adapt to different programs to maximize space utilization

Yes Yes No

Provides the learning spaces technology to prepare students for success

Yes Yes Yes

Provides on-campus adjacencies for program collaboration and streamline communications

Yes No No

Provides small group learning spaces Yes Yes Yes

Meets community college building codes Yes Yes Yes

Does not adversely impact the site’s operations budget

Yes No No

Does not create a transportation hardship for students

Yes No Yes

Is consistent with College Strategic Plan Yes No No

Is the least cost solution Yes No No

Page 22: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

6

Economic Analysis Matrix

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS MATRIX

Alternative #1 Renovate Existing

Buildings*

Alternative #2 Lease Off-Site

Facilities**

Alternative #3 Acquire Temporary

Modulars***

Site Acquisition $0 $0 $0

Plans and Working Drawings $1,626,000 $1,025,000 $6,553,000

Construction Costs:

Utility Service $623,000 $0 $975,000

Site Development-Service $1,770,000 $0 $1,885,000

Site Development-General $564,000 $0 $875,000

Other Site $0 $0 $0

Reconstruction $10,631,000 $0 $0

New Construction $0 $0 $0

Energy Policy Allowance $319,000 $0 $0

Other Construction $0 $0 $0

Construction Soft Costs $2,042,000 $0 $392,000

Total Construction Costs $15,949,000 $0 $4,127,000

Equipment (Group II) $275,000 $275,000 $275,000

Other – Portable or Lease Costs $0 $34,488,000 $15,967,000

Other – Tenant Improvements $0 $1,597,000 $0

Total Project Cost

CCI: 6596 EPI: 3560 $17,850,000 $37,385,000 $26,922,000

Total Costs Escalated CCC Calculates this amount based on latest DOF directions @ CCI: 6596 EPI: 3560

per DOF Budget Letter BL-XXXXX

* Figures Taken from Units and Supporting Costs for the JCAF32 ** $2.25 per gsf per month x gsf x 12 months x 40 years. Tennant Improvements are estimated at $50/gsf

*** Modulars estimated at $250/gsf, 2 Life Cycles

Page 23: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

7

D. Recommended Solution: 1. Which alternative and why?

Alternative # 1, renovate Liberal Arts buildings North and South, and reconstruct with new space design, is the best option because it meets all of the solution criteria. This alternative provides learning, learning support and faculty spaces to best prepare students for successful next steps. The flexible, technologically-advanced spaces support modern teaching and learning modalities, maximize space utilization, and supports small group learning spaces that complement student learning. Located within the existing liberal arts space cluster, this option provides space adjacencies within related programs that promote collaboration and streamline communications. This is also a solution that provides sustainable facilities and infrastructure that supports the instructional program with permanent space, meets Title 24 community colleges building codes, does not adversely impact the site’s operation budget, is the least cost solution, and consistent with the College’s strategic plan.

2. Detailed scope description. This is a Category C project – instructional space modernization. The scope of this project renovates buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and reconstructs space of 31,933 GSF and 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4.424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV and 240 ASF other space.

Space Type ASF Lecture 14,636 Lab 4,424 Office 362 Library 1,980 AV/TV 1,263 Other 240 Total 22,905

Capacity Load Ratios This project is in the continuum of campus projects that realign instructional and instructional support spaces. Upon project completion, overbuilt lab space will have decreased and the remaining spaces do not exceed State space guidelines.

Space Analysis (ASF):

Type Lecture Lab Office Library AV/TV Other Total

Primary 14,636 4,424 362 1,980 1,263 240 22,905

Secondary -17,532 -4,989 -250 0 -90 0 -22,861

Net -2,896 -565 112 1,980 1,173 240 44

Beg. Cap/Load Ratios (2020) 106.3% 185.4% 98.7% 77.6% 73.9% N/A 105.5%

End. Cap/Load Ratios (2023) 98.5% 177.8% 85.4% 79.4% 82.0% N/A 98.8%

Page 24: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

8

3. COBCP Abstract: (Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS – $17,850,000 for Preliminary Plans, Working Drawings, Construction, and Equipment). The project includes the renovation of 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55). Total project costs are estimated at $17,850,000, including preliminary plans ($800,000), working drawings ($826,000), construction ($15,949,000) and equipment ($275,000). Preliminary plans will begin August 2020 and be completed in January 2021. The working drawings are estimated to begin in February 2021 and be completed in April 2022. Construction is scheduled to begin August 2022 and will be completed in January 2024. The District is contributing 50% toward state-supportable project costs.

4. Basis for cost information. The architect for this project, using cost guidelines provided by the State Chancellor’s Office, engineering data based upon the building specifications, and professional cost estimating, has provided the cost estimates.

This project will be designed to exceed Title 24, Part 6 Energy Code by 10%, consistent with the Board of Governors Energy and Sustainability policy. The design incorporates sustainable goals for site, energy efficiency, water use reduction, storm water management, occupant health as well as minimizing the building’s impact on the environment both by design and construction. Strategies will consider:

• Natural and native planting materials will be incorporated around the building to minimize, if

not eliminate, the irrigation demand; • Concrete walkways will be minimized to reduce storm water runoff and promote natural

filtration into the soil as well as a reduction in the heat island effect; • Overhangs have been incorporated to shade glazing; • Low E dual glazing will be incorporated to reduce heat gain; • Roofing will incorporate cool roofing to reduce the heat island effect and heat gain; • Heating and cooling will be provided by a highly energy efficient HVAC system; • Independent HVAC controls provided where applicable; • Natural lighting will be incorporated into most spaces; • Energy saving lighting with automatic lighting controls and sensors; • Interior materials will be low in volatile organic compounds, high in recycled content; • Water efficient fixtures, faucets and devices will be incorporated; • A strict recycling program will be required during construction; • Requested participation in the local utility’s energy incentive program; and • Photovoltaic panels will be incorporated where appropriate.

5. Factors/benefits for recommended solution other than the least expensive alternative. The project presents the least cost solution.

6. Complete description of impact on support budget. While spaces are realigned in this project with minimal ASF grown, no certificated or classified staff changes are anticipated. Maintenance and energy costs, due to more efficient and sustainable building and operational systems, are expected to decrease. Please see 9.1 Analysis of Future Costs in this proposal for a detailed discussion.

7. Identify and explain any project risks. No known risks have been identified for this project at this time.

Page 25: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)

9

8. List requested interdepartmental coordination and/or special project approval (including mandatory reviews and approvals, e.g. technology proposals). • Division of the State Architect and the State Fire Marshall review for structural safety, access

compliance and fire life safety plan and field reviews. • State Public Works Board approval of preliminary plans.

E. Consistency with Government Code Section 65041.1:

Consistent with the provisions of AB 857, Chapter 1016, Statutes of 2002, the California Community Colleges are exempt from these specific provisions of this legislation.

F. Attachments: 1. Project Cost Estimate (Quantity & Unit Costs) 2. JCAF31 3. JCAF32 4. JCAF33 5. Equipment List 6. Schematic Drawings 7. Energy Participation Letter 8. Fiscal Impact Worksheet 9. Other

Page 26: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

8.1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACTENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

(Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 57121)

It has been determined that a Negative Declaration will apply to this project. This declaration will be submitted to the appropriate agencies for approval prior to the submission of the Preliminary Plans to the Chancellors Office.

Page 27: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

9.1 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE COSTS

Provide an economic analysis of additional instructional, administrative, and maintenance cost resulting from the proposed project, including personnel years. Disclose all new courses or programs to be housed in the projectthat may need Chancellor’s Office review.

Personnel Costs

Certificated:

Classified:

Depreciation, Maintenance, and Operation:

Program/Course/Service Approvals: List all new programs/courses/services to be housed in this project or its secondary effects and give the date of approval. If there are not new programs/courses/services for which approvalis required, please so state. This is not required for equipment-only projects.

Name of New Program/Course/Service Date of Approval

No new programs

This is a renovation of two exsisting buildings with minimal asf growth (44 asf). There will be no need for additional certificated staff.

This is a renovation of two exsisting buildings with minimal asf growth (44 asf). There will be no need for additional classified staff.

Since this is a renovation of two existing building, energy efficiency measures will help reduce the energy cost per square foot over the current building. Maintenance and operations costs are estimated at $9.00 per net GSF (31,933 GSF) and will be approximately $287,000 per year in additional utilities, supplies and materials expenditures.

Page 28: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus

Page 10’

N

400’500’ 200’

OVERALL SITE PLAN

Page 29: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus

Page 20’

N

100’150’ 50’

SITE PLAN

Page 30: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Page 3Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”

N

2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus

BUILDING 51

DP

Page 31: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Page 4Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”

N

2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus

BUILDING 55

DP

Page 32: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Page 5Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”

N

2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus

BUILDING 51 ELEVATIONS

Page 33: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

Page 6Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”

N

2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus

BUILDING 55 ELEVATIONS

Page 34: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

* Indicates manual override

JCAF 33- Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Grossmont College/Grossmont-Cuyamaca CCD) (Official) EPI: 3560 (12/17)3560 (12/17) Rm. Type Description TOP No. Department

No. Rms

No. Sta

Room No. ASF

Sec. ASF

Increase In Space

Equip Cost Per ASF

Total Allowable

Cost

110-115 Classroom 0099-4999 14,636 -17,532 -2,896 $16.65 $0

210 Class Lab 0701 Information Technology, General 4,424 -4,989 -565 $242.00 $0

300 - 355 Faculty Offices 0099 - 4999 362 -250 112 $26.03 $2,915

410-420 Library - Reading and Stack Space 6110, 6120 1,980 1,980 $39.06 $77,339

530-535 Audio Visual Arts 6130 1,263 -90 1,173 $116.19 $136,291

710-715 Data Processing/Computer Lab 0000-9600 240 240 $242.00 $58,080

Totals: 22,905 -22,861 44 $274,625

CFIS #: 40.19.XXX

Page 35: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

12.1 - Justification For Additional Costs Exceeding Guidelines

District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District Project:College: Grossmont College Date: August 1, 2018

Construction Equipment

Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS

There are no known additional costs for this project. The Quantities and Unit Costs contains all of the costs associated with this project.

Page 36: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD

District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District

Project: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS College: Grossmont College August 1, 2018 EPI 3560

Rm # Room Description Item Description 1 Units Unit Cost Total Cost

Less Existing

Inventory 2

Total New Equipment

Needed

Faculty OfficeBox File Cabinet 8 $445 $3,558 $3,558

Lateral File Cabinet 8 $445 $3,558 $3,558Upper Cabinets 8 $556 $4,447 $4,447

Computer 4 $3,335 $13,342 $13,342Desktop Printer 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224

Telephone 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224Workstation 4 $1,668 $6,671 $6,671

Bookcases 36" Ht 8 $389 $3,113 $3,113Staff Task Chair 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224

Guest Chair 8 $389 $3,113 $3,113

Study Room

Round Table 20 $1,223 $24,460 $24,460

Student Chair 60 $445 $26,683 $26,683

Instructors Table 2 $556 $1,112 $1,112

Instructors Chair 2 $556 $1,112 $1,112

Instructors Computer 2 $3,335 $6,671 $6,671

Instructors Smart Workstation 2 $2,668 $5,337 $5,337

AV Interface Control System 2 $1,668 $3,335 $3,335

Printer/Copier/Scanner/FAX 3 $1,779 $5,337 $5,337

LCD Projector 2 $2,224 $4,447 $4,447

Sound System 2 $1,668 $3,335 $3,335

Visual Presenter 2 $2,668 $5,337 $5,337

Distance Education

Student Chair 60 $445 $26,683 $26,683

10' Table 20 $667 $13,342 $13,342

Instructors Table 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224

Instructors Chair 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224

Instructors Computer 4 $2,780 $11,118 $11,118

Printer/Copier/Scanner/FAX 2 $1,779 $3,558 $3,558

Instructors Smart Workstation 4 $2,668 $10,673 $10,673

AV Interface Control System 4 $1,668 $6,671 $6,671

LCD Projector 4 $2,224 $8,894 $8,894

Sound System 2 $1,668 $3,335 $3,335

Visual Presenter 2 $2,668 $5,337 $5,337

Distance Education System 2 $26,683 $53,367 $53,367

Grand Total $279,063 $279,063

13.1 - Detailed Equipment List

Page 37: Final Project Proposal 2020-2021 - GCCCD