Upload
vishal-gaonkar
View
613
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ppt 7
Citation preview
Sahara Directed to Refund Rs. 24k cr
Presented by-Group 5
Sagar Devarkar R-11-06
Sahil Nerurkar R-11-23
Priti Pai Kakode R-11-24
Sharmad Pai Kane R-11-25
Sheldon Rebello R-11-30
Fakhruddin Ayam R-11-37
ContentsIntroductionSEBISATRHP OFCDsCaseNature of OFCDsAnalysis Current Situation Our StandConclusion
IntroductionSahara India Pariwar
Sahara India Real Estate Corporation (SIREC)
Sahara Housing investment Corporation (SHIC)
SEBISecurities and Exchange Board of India
Have to be responsive to the needs of three groups
Has been invested with the necessary powers for the discharge of its functions efficiently
SATSecurities Appellate Tribunal
According to this, hear and dispose of appeals against orders passed by the SEBI or by an adjudicating officer under the Act.
To exercise jurisdiction, powers and authority conferred on the Tribunal by or under this Act or any other law for the time being in force.
Red Herring ProspectusDocument submitted by a company as part of
a public offering of securities.
Filed with the SEC
Issued to potential investors
Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs)
Debt securityTo convert his debenture into equity share.Does not have interest in period of 6 months.
After that holders of OFCDsApply for equity shareThe option has to be in the application form.No additional amount needs to be paid.
CaseBackground
Role of SEBI: Securities exchange board of IndiaSAT: Securities Appellate Tribunal
Justification by Sahara
Judgment by supreme court
Nature of OFCDsThere are tow type of OFCDS
Public Private
Sahara’s OFCD is faced on “hybrids”Issued to 66 luck from different it’s brunches. No issue of security.
Companies Act 2(19A) “Hybrids”Any security which has the character of more than one type of
security, including their derivatives.
On what basis did Sahara challenge SEBI’s power
Issue was outside SEBI's jurisdiction
The Two companies were Unlisted
OFCD’s are not securities
The issue made was a private placement
SEBI in its defense Issue involving 50 or more people to be public issues
All public issues should go through SEBI framework
Just disclaimers can’t ward away SEBI
Conduct, not statements, determines whether an issue is
public
SEBI has powers to take any step to protect investor
Supreme court decision
Sahara directed to refund around Rs 24,000 crore to their investors within three months with 15 per cent interest per annum.
What if Sahara fails to refund?
SEBI can attach properties and freeze bank accounts of the companies.
Current Situation
Sahara has filed Review petition
To uphold its image
The group's commitment to refund Prevails
“All our inverters are genuine”
ConclusionIt is a very good judgment
Act as a deterrent those unscrupulous promoters
Fight given by SEBI commendable