Upload
courtney-correa
View
36
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FUEL VOLUME CONSUMPTION VS. GAS PRICESNational and State Level Comparisons
NATIONAL COMPARISONSJanuary 2014-December 2015
National ComparisonsJanuary 2014-December 2015
U.S. Fuel Volume Consumption increased from 177,664,360,438 to 181,889,783,922 gallons – a 4,225,423,484 or 2.40% increase
Overall, a 4 billion or 2.4% is not that large of a difference
U.S. Gas Prices had an average decrease of $0.93 or -27%Average gas price in 2014 was $3.442
Average gas price in 2015 was $2.510
From 2014-2015, Fuel Volume Consumption Increased, while Gas Prices Decreased
*Excess of crude oil supply over demand
Correlation Slight, weak inverse relationship between fuel volume consumption and gas prices
Index of Determination The value indicates that 0.88% of the variation in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship between gas prices and fuel volume consumption. Therefore, gas prices have little to no effect on the overall fuel volume consumption in the United States.
National Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
$ 4.000$ 3.500$ 3.000$ 2.500$ 2.000
1.6000E+10
1.5500E+10
1.5000E+10
1.4500E+10
1.4000E+10
1.3500E+10
1.3000E+10
Gas Prices
Fuel
Volu
me C
onsu
mptio
n
Scatterplot of Fuel Volume Consumption vs Gas Prices
National Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
A straight line indicates almost 0 correlation
STATE LEVEL COMPARISONSJanuary 2014-December 2015
Correlation
Index of Determination The value indicates that 0.36% of the variation in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship between gas prices and fuel volume consumption.
Conclusion: There is no correlation.
California Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation
Index of Determination
The value indicates that 0.47% of the variation in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship between gas prices and fuel volume consumption.
Conclusion: There is no correlation.
Colorado Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation
Index of Determination
Conclusion: There is a slight inverse relationship between fuel volume consumption and gas prices in the state of Florida.
21.44% of the change in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship that fuel volume consumption and gas prices in Florida have.
Florida Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation
Index of Determination
The value indicates that 0.03% of the variation in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship between gas prices and fuel volume consumption.
Conclusion: There is not a correlation between fuel volume consumption and gas prices.
Massachusetts Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation
Index of Determination
The value indicates that 0.94% of the variation in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship between gas prices and fuel volume consumption.
Conclusion: There is not a correlation between fuel volume consumption and gas prices.
Minnesota Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation Index of Determination
Conclusion: There is a very slight, weak inverse relationship between fuel volume consumption and gas prices in the state of New York.
3.69% of the change in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship that fuel volume consumption and gas prices have in the state of New York.
New York Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation Index of Determination
Conclusion: There is a very slight, weak inverse relationship between fuel volume consumption and gas prices in the state of Ohio.
1.17% of the change in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship fuel volume consumption and gas prices have in the state of Ohio.
Ohio Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation Index of Determination
Conclusion: There is a slight inverse relationship between fuel volume consumption and gas prices in the state of Texas.
22.67% of the change in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship that fuel volume consumption and gas prices have in the state of Texas.
Texas Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Correlation Index of Determination
Conclusion: There is a very slight, weak direct correlation between fuel volume consumption and gas prices.
1.98% of the change in fuel volume consumption can be explained by the relationship that fuel volume consumption and gas prices have in the state of Washington.
Washington Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Texas and Florida
Texas
Florida3.753.503.253.002.752.502.252.00
1250000000
1200000000
1150000000
1100000000
1050000000
1000000000
950000000
Gas Prices
Fuel
Vol
ume
Cons
umpt
ion
Texas
4.03.53.02.52.0
775000000
750000000
725000000
700000000
675000000
650000000
Gas Prices
Fuel
Volu
me C
onsu
mpt
ion
Florida
Texas:
Florida:
4.03.53.02.52.0
1300000000
1200000000
1100000000
1000000000
900000000
800000000
700000000
600000000
500000000
400000000
Gas Prices
Fuel
Volu
me C
onsu
mpt
ion
FloridaNew YorkTexas
States
Fuel Volume Consumption vs. Gas Prices
Texas = Highest Fuel Volume Consumption out of 3 Most Correlated States (TX, FL, NY)
PROJECTIONS
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017-2-10123456789
767880828486889092949698 Forecast
World Liquid Fuels Consumptionmillion barrels per day (MMb/d)
Change in U.S. consumption (right axis)Change in China consumption (right axis)Change in other consumption (right axis)Forecast
annual change (MMb/d)
Source: Short-Term Energy Outlook, July 2016.
Gas prices depend on cost of crude oil, demand &
many other factors. Motor gasoline prices are
expected to rise through 2040 by 11%.
U.S. fuel volume consumption will actually decrease over time (-21% through 2040) – “declines in energy consumption tend to
result from the adoption of more energy-efficient
technologies and policies that promote energy efficiency”
http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383%282015%29.pdf
“Gasoline consumption in the transportation sector in 2040 is 21% lower than in
2013. In contrast, diesel fuel consumption, grows at an average rate of 0.8%/year
from 2013-2040 as economic growth results in more shipments of goods.”
"Petroleum consumption in the US was lower in 2014 than it was in 1997, despite the fact that the
economy grew almost 50% over this period."https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/07/the-surprising-decline-in-us-petroleum-consumption
http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383%282015%29.pdf
Gas is a necessity – people need gas to live their daily lives (drive to work, school, grocery store, etc.)
The leveling off of fuel volume consumption has resulted in more than $150 billion that can now be spent on non-petroleum goods & services.
In certain states, gas prices have a larger effect on fuel volume consumption in comparison to national results, however this is not seen in all states that were analyzed.
Implications