Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR
FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FILING NO. 3 & 4
APRIL 2020
Prepared for: CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT FLYING HORSE LLC
6385 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 200 COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80919
(719) 592-9333
Prepared by: CLASSIC CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
619 N. CASCADE AVENUE, SUITE 200 COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80903
(719) 785-0790
Job no. 1171.52
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FILING NO. 3 & 4
Page ii
DRAINAGE REPORT FOR FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FILING NO. 3 & 4
AGE ADDENDUM STATEMENT Engineer’s Statement This report and plan for the drainage design of Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4 was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) and is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Said report and plan has been prepared in accordance with the City of Colorado Springs Drainage Criteria Manual and is in conformity with the master plan of the drainage basin. I understand that the City of Colorado Springs does not and will not assume liability for drainage facilities designed by others. I accept responsibility for any liability caused by any negligent acts, errors or omissions on my part in preparing this report. SIGNATURE (Affix Seal):
Colorado P.E. No. 46477 Date Developer’s Statement Pulpit Rock Investments LLC hereby certifies that the drainage facilities for Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4 shall be constructed according to the design presented in this report. I understand that the City of Colorado Springs does not and will not assume liability for the drainage facilities designed and/or certified by my engineer and that are submitted to the City of Colorado Springs pursuant to section 7.7.906 of the City Code; and cannot, on behalf of Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4, guarantee that final drainage design review will absolve Pulpit Rock Investment LLC and/or their successors and/or assigns of future liability for improper design. I further understand that approval of the final plat does not imply approval of my engineer’s drainage design. Pulpit Rock Investments LLC Name of Developer Signature Mr. Drew Balsick Printed Name Vice President Title 6385 Corporate Drive, Suite 200 Colorado Springs, CO 80919 City of Colorado Springs Statement: Filed in accordance with Section 7.7.906 of the Code of the City of Colorado Springs, 2001, as amended. __________________________________________ ______________________ For City Engineer Date Conditions:
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FILING NO. 3 & 4
Page iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS: PURPOSE Page 1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Page 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Page 1 PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS Page 2 STORMWATER QUALITY/DETENTION Page 6 FLOODPLAIN STATEMENT Page 9 DRAINAGE AND BRIDGE FEES Page 9
SUMMARY Page 12 REFERENCES Page 13 APPENDICES
VICINITY MAP
SOILS MAP (S.C.S. SURVEY)
F.E.M.A. MAP
CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE MAP
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FILING NO. 3 & 4
Page 1
PURPOSE
This document is the Final Drainage Report for Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4. The purpose of this
report is to identify onsite and offsite drainage patterns, and areas tributary to the site, and to safely route developed
storm water runoff to adequate outfall facilities.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Please consider this the Final Drainage Report for Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4. This report is
being written to accompany the Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4 Development Plan and the Flying
Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No’s 3 & 4 Plats. Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4 is 58.69 acres of proposed
residential development in a portion of section 9 and 16, township 12 south, range 66 west of the sixth principal
meridian located east of State Highway 83., and north of Black Squirrel Creek. This Development Plan proposes
to develop approximately 58.69 acres into 95 residential single-family lots and tracts in 2 separate filings. This
project is not within an existing Stream Side Overlay zone.
According to the Soil Survey of El Paso County Area, Colorado, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service, the soils underlying the site consist of Soil Types “93” Tomah-Crowfoot Complex.
These classifications are considered a Hydrologic Group “B” (See Appendix).
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
See appendix for Existing Drainage Map for reference to descriptions below:
The site is mainly located within the Black Squirrel Creek Drainage Basin with a portion of the site in the Middle
Creek Drainage Basin and a portion of Monument Branch Drainage Basin and has existing slopes ranging from
1% to 33% and ground cover being predominantly native grasses. This site has been previously studied as a part
of the Black Squirrel Creek Drainage Basin (DBPS), the Flying Horse Master Development Drainage Plan
(MDDP), Final Drainage Report for Flying Horse 25 Turin Filing No. 1 and Final Drainage Report for Flying
Horse 25 Turin and Final Drainage Report amendment for Flying Horse 25 Filing No. 1, 2, &3” and the
“Preliminary/Final Drainage Report for Flying Horse No. 4 Palermo Filing No. 3, 4 & 5”.
Existing flows travel southwesterly direction towards Black Squirrel Creek. Per the Black Squirrel Drainage Basin
Planning Study (D.B.P.S) a proposed public pond, Detention Facility No. 5 is to be built with the development of
this portion of Flying Horse as on offline facility. This facility will have a historic release of 106cfs.
Page 2
Basin EX-2 (Q5= 6 cfs, Q100= 45 cfs) is 23.29 acres of existing natural ground with native grasses and represents
a portion of Flying Horse No. 23 residential area. This area will be tributary to the proposed Full Spectrum
Detention Facility that will be proposed with development of Flying Horse No. 4 Palermo Filing No. 3, 4, 5.
Basin EX-3 (Q5= 10 cfs, Q100= 73 cfs) is 35.14 acres of existing natural ground with native grasses and represents
a portion of Future Flying Horse No. 23 residential area. Currently flows from this area sheet flow to the east
towards existing State Highway 83. Flows are routed in an existing roadside ditch to Black Squirrel Creek.
PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
See appendix for Proposed Drainage Map for reference to descriptions below:
Design Point 1 (Q5= 6 cfs, Q100= 14 cfs) consists of developed flows from Basin A, Basin A-1, Basin OS-3 along
with Basin O, N, Q from Flying Horse No. 25 Turin Filing No. 2. Basin A is 1.84 acres of proposed residential
landscaping and homes. Basin A-1 is a 0.44-acre tract for a future park and Basin OS-3 is 0.58 acres of existing
rear landscape yards that flow onto Basin A-1. Flows will travel in the curb line of Veneto Way and combine with
existing flows from Flying Horse 25 Turin Filing No. 2 flows (Basin O, N Q Flying Horse 25 report) to Design
Point 1 where an existing public 6’ D-10-R sump inlet will intercept flows. Street Capacity for a collector street
with Type 1 curb and gutter at 2.00% is Q5= 25.6 cfs (1/2 street), Q100= 109 cfs (to ROW) at this design point.
Flows will be conveyed by an existing public 24” RCP storm sewer. The emergency overflow route for this inlet
will overtop the crown in the road to Design Point 2. Per the Flying Horse 25 Turin drainage report this was
Design Point 7 (Q5= 8 cfs, Q100= 16 cfs). Existing installed facilities are adequately sized to handle developed
flows.
Design Point 2 (Q5= 3 cfs, Q100= 6 cfs) consists of developed flows from Basin B along with Basin R from Flying
Horse 25 Turin Filing No. 2. Basin B is 0.55 acres of proposed collector street and landscaping. Flows will travel
in the curb line of Veneto Way and combine with existing flows from Flying Horse 25 Turin Filing No. 2 flows
(Basin R Flying Horse 25 report) to Design Point 2 where an existing public 4’ D-10-R sump inlet will intercept
flows. Street Capacity for a collector street with Type 1 curb and gutter at 2.00% is Q5= 25.6 cfs (1/2 street),
Q100= 109 cfs (to ROW) at this design point. Flows will be conveyed by an existing public 24” RCP storm sewer.
The emergency overflow route for this inlet will overtop the crown in the road to Design Point 1. Per the Flying
Horse 25 Turin drainage report this was Design Point 6 (Q5=2 cfs, Q100= 5 cfs). Existing installed facilities are
adequately sized to handle developed flows.
Page 3
Design Point 3 (Q5= 10 cfs, Q100= 28 cfs) consists of developed flows from Basin C. Basin C is 8.74 acres of
proposed residential with associated streets, landscaping and homes. Flows will travel in the northerly curb line of
Sangria Drive to Design Point 3 where a proposed public 12’ D-10-R sump inlet will intercept flows. Street
Capacity for a residential street with Type 5 curb and gutter at 2.00% is Q5= 11.8cfs (1/2 street), Q100= 44.4 cfs
(to ROW) at this design point. Flows will be conveyed by a proposed public 30” RCP storm sewer (Pipe 1). The
emergency overflow route for this inlet will overtop the crown to Design Point 4.
Design Point 4 (Q5= 4 cfs, Q100= 10 cfs) consists of developed flows from Basin D. Basin D is 2.52 acres of
proposed residential with associated streets, landscaping and homes. Flows will travel in the southerly curb line of
Sangria Street to Design Point 4 where a proposed public 4’ D-10-R sump inlet will intercept flows. Street Capacity
for a residential street with Type 5 curb and gutter at 2.00% is Q5= 11.8 cfs (1/2 street), Q100= 44.4 cfs (to ROW)
at this design point. Flows will be conveyed by a proposed public 18” RCP storm sewer (Pipe 2). The emergency
overflow route for this inlet will be Veneto Way.
Design Point 5 (Q5= 11 cfs, Q100= 29 cfs) consists of developed flows from Basin E, F and G. Basin E is 4.23
acres and Basin F is 3.42 acres. Both are proposed residential with associated streets, landscaping and homes.
Basin G is 0.88 acres of Veneto Way. Flows will travel in the easterly curb line of Veneto Way to Design Point 5
where a proposed public 12’ D-10-R sump inlet will intercept flows. Street Capacity for a collector street with
Type 1 curb and gutter at 2.00% is Q5= 25.6 cfs (1/2 street), Q100= 109 cfs (to ROW) at this design point. Flows
will be conveyed by a proposed public 30” RCP storm sewer (Pipe 4). The emergency overflow route for this inlet
will the intersection of Ridgeline Drive and Veneto Way.
Design Point 6 (Q5= 4 cfs, Q100= 8 cfs) consists of flows from Basin H. Basin H consists of 1.64 acres of proposed
Veneto Way. Flows will travel in the easterly curb line of Veneto Way to Design Point 6 where a proposed public
4’ D-10-R sump inlet will intercept flows. Street Capacity for a collector street with Type 1 curb and gutter at
2.00% is Q5= 25.6 cfs (1/2 street), Q100= 109 cfs (to ROW) at this design point. Flows will be conveyed by a
proposed public 18” RCP storm sewer (Pipe 5). The emergency overflow route for this inlet will over top the
crown in the road to Design Point 5
Design Point 7 (Q5= 7 cfs, Q100= 26 cfs) consists of flows from Basin I and Basin OS-1. Basin I consists of 9.11
acres of proposed residential with associated streets, landscaping and homes. Basin OS-1 consist of 0.18 acres
of vegetated slope. Flows will travel in the curb line of Sangria Drive to Design Point 7 where a proposed public
16’ D-10-R sump inlet will intercept flows. Street Capacity for a residential street with Type 5 curb and gutter at
Page 4
4.00% is Q5= 16.7 cfs (1/2 street), Q100= 37.3 cfs (to ROW) at this design point. Flows will be conveyed by a
proposed public 30” RCP storm sewer (Pipe 7). The emergency overflow route for this inlet will overtop the curb
and into Tract B.
Basin J (Q5= 1 cfs, Q100= 2 cfs) is 0.28 acres and Basin K (Q5= 1 cfs, Q100= 2 cfs) is 0.23 acres. These basins
consist of flows from Ridgeline Drive West of Veneto Way. Flow will travel in the curbline of Ridgeline Drive and
will be intercepted by an existing 16’ D-10-R at grade inlet at the intersection of Hawkstone Drive and Ridgeline
Drive as well as an existing 12’ D-10-R sump inlet in Hawkstone Drive. Flows are treated in the existing public
Full Spectrum Detention Facility located at Ridgeline Drive and Clayhouse Drive in Flying Horse No. 4 Palermo
Filing No. 1.
Basin L (Q5= 1 cfs, Q100= 8 cfs) is 2.96 acres, Basin M (Q5= 0.20 cfs, Q100= 1 cfs) is 0.51 acres and Basin OS-2
(Q5= 2 cfs, Q100= 16 cfs) is 7.64 acres. These basins consist of flows from vegetated Tract A which will be slope
area for Powers construction, and future ROW for Powers Boulevard/SH 21. In the interim until Powers
Boulevard is construction occurs flows will be routed to a temporary sediment basin to be located with the GEC
plan for Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 1 & 2. Once Powers is constructed flows will need to be accounted
for in the drainage pattern for Powers Blvd.
Basin N (Q5= 5 cfs, Q100= 32 cfs) is 13.21 acres. This basin consists of rear yard landscaping, roof, and patio
within the single-family lots and undisturbed vegetated slope along Hwy 83. Of that 13.21 acres of basin, 0.22
acres is the assumed impervious area (patio, roof) of the residential development. This basin will drain as
unconcentrated sheet flow across the landscape rear yard and undisturbed vegetated slope along its historic path
to the adjacent existing road side ditch along State Hwy 83 and eventually to Black Squirrel Creek. Slope constraints
limit the disturbance along this corridor. The physical constraints of the elevations along Hwy 83 make collection
of stormwater difficult to capture and treat, and is impractical to access for maintenance. This 0.22 acres of
impervious area will sheet flow over approximately 300+’ feet of natural grass buffer prior to discharge into Black
Squirrel Creek. The landscape drainage from the rear yard will be treated as a grass buffer with a minimum width of
20’ and over the entire length of 1,900 linear feet across this basin. The grass buffer form in the Appendix shows that
the sheet flow for the 2 year, 1 cfs from this basin is adequately treated prior to discharge into existing Black Squirrel
Creek. Any roof drains will be routed north to the proposed roadway in an attempt to route as much impervious
area to the Full Spectrum Detention Facility.
Page 5
Basin O (Q5 3 cfs, Q100= 19 cfs) is 8.04 acres. This basin consists of rear yard landscaping, roof, and patio within
the single-family lots and undisturbed vegetated slope. Of that 8.04 acres of basin, 0.14 acres is the assumed
impervious area (patio, roof) of the residential development. This basin will drain as unconcentrated sheet flow
across the landscape rear yard and undisturbed vegetated slope along its historic path to the adjacent Black Squirrel
Creek. Slope constraints of the existing grading the disturbance along this corridor are limited due to protected
Preble’s Jumping Mouse. The physical constraints of the elevations along Black Squirrel Creek make collection of
stormwater difficult to capture and treat, and is impractical to access for maintenance. This 0.14 acres of
impervious area will sheet flow over approximately 500’ feet of natural grass buffer prior to discharge into Black
Squirrel Creek. The landscape drainage from the rear yard will be treated as a grass buffer with a minimum width of
20’ and over the entire length of 1,200 linear feet across this basin. The grass buffer form in the Appendix shows that
the sheet flow for the 2 year, 1 cfs from this basin is adequately treated prior to discharge into existing Black Squirrel
Creek. Any roof drains will be routed north to the proposed roadway in an attempt to route as much impervious
area to the Full Spectrum Detention Facility.
Pipe 8 (Q5= 33 cfs, Q100= 92 cfs) is the total developed flows from Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 1 & 2
that will discharge into a public 42” RCP storm sewer stub provided with the construction of Flying Horse Palermo
Filing No. 3. Per the Flying Horse Palermo Filing No. 3, 4, &5 drainaage report flows tributary to the 42” RCP
storm sewer stub were represented as Basin OS-1 (Q5= 37 cfs, Q100= 97 cfs) is 30.30 acres of future Flying Horse
No. 23 located between Future Powers Blvd and State Hwy 83. The 42” RCP storm sewer stub was provided in
order to route future developed flows to the proposed public Full Spectrum Detention Facility Pond 1 where
developed flows will be treated. Onsite detention will not be required for Flying Horse 23 with construction of
Pond 1.
STORM WATER QUALITY/DETENTION
Developed flows from Flying Horse No. 4 Palermo Filing No. 3, 4, & 5 along with flows from Flying Horse 23
Turin Filing No. 1 and 2 will be routed to a public Full Spectrum Detention facility, EDB Pond 1 located in Flying
Horse Palermo Filing No. 3. This facility will release treated developed flows into Black Squirrel Creek. This
facility is a public facility with maintenance of storm/outlet structures by the City of Colorado Springs, and
maintenance of the landscaping/surface treatment by the HOA. No additional on-site detention or stormwater
quality is proposed for this development at this time.
Per the Black Squirrel Drainage Basin Planning Study (D.B.P.S) proposed Pond 1 was included in list of major
facilities on the developed conditions map as Detention Pond No. 5.
Page 6
The City of Colorado Springs has required the Four Step Process for receiving water protection that focuses on
reducing runoff volumes, treating the water quality capture volume (WQCV), stabilizing drainage ways, and
implementing long-term source controls. The Four Step Process pertains to management of smaller, frequently
occurring storm events, as opposed to larger storms for which drainage and flood control infrastructure are sized.
Implementation of these four steps helps to achieve storm water permit requirements. This site adheres to this
Four Step Process as follows:
1. Employ Runoff Reduction Practices: Development of project site is proposed single family residential
with individual lots with homes and associated landscaping. Proposed impervious areas (roof tops, patios)
will sheet flow across landscaped ground to slow runoff and increase time of concentration prior to being
conveyed to the proposed public streets. This will minimize directly connected impervious areas within
the project site. See appendix for IRF spreadsheet.
2. Implement BMP’s that provide a Water Quality Capture Volume with slow release: Runoff from
Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 1 & 2 and Flying Horse No. 4 Filing No. 3, 4 & 5 will be treated
through capture and slow release in a permanent Full Spectrum Extended Detention Basin designed per
current City of Colorado Springs drainage criteria.
3. Stabilize Drainageways: This site will utilize existing storm sewer adjacent to the site. A public storm
system will intercept and direct the on-site development flows further downstream to proposed detention
facilities designed to release below historic rates into Black Squirrel Creek. Based upon the proposed
reduction in released flows compared to the anticipated flows that were assumed in the design of
downstream facilities, no impact to Black Squirrel Creek is anticipated. Drainage Fees will be paid for
improvements to Black Squirrel Creek per the DBPS. The developer is responsible for analyzing portions
of Black Squirrel Creek. A separate analysis will follow this report. If the analysis of the portions of Black
Squirrel Creek adjacent to this development finds that improvements are required, these improvements
shall be fully constructed and accepted for the probationary period by the City's Public Works Department
or assurances posted for 100% of the public improvement cost prior to the issuance of the first building
permit within the Flying Horse Palermo Filing No’s 3, 4 and 5 development project as well as Flying
Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 1 & 2. Any deviation from this standard process will require a development
agreement between the developer and the City.
Page 7
4. Implement Site Specific and Other Source Control BMP’s: A site specific storm water quality and
erosion control plan and narrative will be submitted and approved by City Engineering prior to any
disturbance within the project area. Details such as site specific source control construction BMP’s as well
as permanent BMP’s will be detailed in this plan and narrative to protect receiving waters.
DRAINAGE CRITERIA
Hydrologic calculations were performed using the City of Colorado Springs/El Paso County Drainage Criteria
Manual, as revised in May 2014. Detention storage and storm sewer conveyance to Black Squirrel Drainage Basin
was established with the M.D.D.P. for Flying Horse. The Rational Method was used to estimate stormwater runoff
anticipated from design storms for the 5-year and 100-year recurrence interval.
Hydraulic Grade Line Calculations will be provided with the Storm Sewer and EDB construction drawings at the
time of submittal of those plans.
FLOODPLAIN STATEMENT
No portion of this site is located within a floodplain as determined by the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (F.I.R.M.)
Map Number 08041C 0295G effective date, December 07, 2018 (See Appendix).
COST OPINION – FILING NO. 3
INITIAL PUBLIC DRAINAGE FACILITIES REIMBURSABLE JUSTIFICATION FILING NO. 3
BLACK SQUIRREL CREEK BASIN
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST COST 1. 4’ D-10-R Inlet 2 EACH $3,900/EA $ 7,800.00 2. 12’ D-10-R Inlet 1 EACH $5,200/EA $ 5,200.00 3. 16’ D-10-R Inlet 1 EACH $7,200/EA $ 7,200.00 4. 18” RCP Storm Drain 50 LF $45/LF $ 2,250.00 5. 30” RCP Storm Drain 1,075 LF $68/LF $ 73,100.00 6. 42” RCP Storm Drain 1,170 LF $160/LF $ 187,200.00
SUB-TOTAL $ 282,750.00 10% ENGINEERING $ 28,275.00 5% CONTINGENCIES $ 14,137.50 SUB-TOTAL $ 325,162.50
Page 8
Per the Black Squirrel Creek Drainage Basin Planning Study initial system Figure 5 (urban and rural)
conveyance facilities are reimbursable north of DBPS Pond #5 (36” RCP pipe and Inlets as shown
on Fig. 5) Figure 5 of the Black Squirrel Creek Drainage Basin Planning Study shows the entire
length of pipe being a 36” storm sewer north of Pond#5 with inlets in future Flying Horse 23. Fees
calculated adding up the entire length of pipe shown above and applying the 36” storm sewer costs
with inlets brought up to today’s dollars using a rate increase of 2.65 as calculated from the Colorado
Springs Annual Construction Index:
1. 36” RCP Storm Drain 500 LF $230.55/LF $ 115,275.00 2. D-10-R Inlet 7 EACH $6,625/EA $ 46,375.00
SUB-TOTAL $ 161,650.00 The estimated cost of construction of the storm sewer for Filing No. 3 ($325,162.50) is more than the assumed cost per the DBPS 36” storm sewer plus inlets ($161,650.00). Reimbursement of the initial system estimate for Filing 3.
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE FILING NO. 3 FILING 3 INTIAL SYSTEMS $ 161,650.00 TOTAL REIMBURSABLE FILING NO. 3 $ 161,650.00 PUBLIC DRAINAGE FACILITIES NON-REIMBURSABLE FILING NO. 3
BLACK SQUIRREL CREEK BASIN
1. Type I Storm MH 6 EACH $6,500/EA $ 39,000.00
SUB-TOTAL $ 39,000.00 10% ENGINEERING $ 3,900.00 5% CONTINGENCIES $ 1,950.00 TOTAL NON-REIMBURSABLE FILING NO. 3 $ 44,850.00
Page 9
COST OPINION – FILING NO. 4
PUBLIC DRAINAGE FACILITIES NON-REIMBURSABLE FILING NO. 4
BLACK SQUIRREL CREEK BASIN
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST COST 1. 4’ D-10-R Inlet 1 EACH $3,900/EA $ 3,900.00 2. 12’ D-10-R Inlet 1 EACH $4,800/EA $ 4,800.00 3. 18” RCP Storm Drain 50 LF $45/LF $ 2,250.00 4. 30” RCP Storm Drain 100 LF $100/LF $ 10,000.00 5. Type I Storm MH 1 EACH $6,500/EA $ 6,500.00 SUB-TOTAL $ 27,450.00 10% ENGINEERING $ 2,745.00 5% CONTINGENCIES $ 1,372.50 SUB-TOTAL $ 31,567.50 TOTAL NON-REIMBURSABLE FILING NO. 4 $ 31,567.50 Classic Consulting Engineers & Surveyors cannot and does not guarantee that the construction cost will not vary
from these opinions of probable construction costs. These opinions represent our best judgment as design
professionals familiar with the construction industry and this development in particular.
DRAINAGE AND BRIDGE FEES FILING NO. 3
BLACK SQUIRREL BASIN
The total platted area of Filing No. 3 within Black Squirrel Basin is 38.121 acres.
BLACK SQUIRREL FEE CALCULATIONS: $14,593/acre x 38.121 acres (Drainage 2020) $ 556,299.75 $1,667/acre x 38.121 acres (Bridge 2020) $ 65,547.71 $3,739/acre x 38.121 acres (Pond Land 2020) $ 142,534.42
Black Squirrel Fees Filing No. 3 $764,381.88 CREDITS:
Total Credits available at the time of Filing No. 3 plat are:
$85,526.21 Credits available (FH Palermo 3,4,5) - $142,534.00 Pond Land Fees at Filing 3 plat
Page 10
Total fees available for Credit after Filing No. 3 $0 Remaining for use in basin.
A. Reimbursable initial and major facilities credits will be used to offset drainage fees for Turin Filing No. 3 in the amount of $161,650.00
BLACK SQUIRREL FINAL FEE CALCULATIONS FILING NO. 3: $14,593/acre x 38,121 acres (Drainage 2020) FEES OFFSET $556,299.75 -161,650.00
$394,649.75 $1,667/acre x 38,121 acres (Bridge 2020) $ 65,547.71 $3,739/acre x 38,121 acres (Pond Land 2020) POND LAND CREDIT $ 142,534.42-85,526.21 $57,008.21
Black Squirrel Fees Turin Filing No. 3 - due at platting $517,205.67 MIDDLE CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN
A portion of this site lies within the Middle Creek Drainage Basin boundaries. The total platted area of Filing
No. 3 within Middle Creek Basin is 2.03 acres.
MIDDLE CREEK FEE CALCULATIONS: $24,907/acre x 2.03 acres (Drainage 2020) $ 50,561.21 $1,121/acre x 2.03 acres (Pond Land 2020) $ 2,275.63 Middle Creek Fees Filing No. 4 $52,836.84
Middle Creek Fees Turin Filing No. 3 - due at platting $52,836.84
Page 11
DRAINAGE AND BRIDGE FEES FILING NO. 4
BLACK SQUIRREL BASIN
The total platted area of Filing No. 4 within Black Squirrel Basin is 13.49 acres
BLACK SQUIRREL FEE CALCULATIONS: $14,593/acre x 13.49 acres (Drainage 2020) $ 196,859.57 $1,667/acre x 13.49 acres (Bridge 2020) $ 22,487.83 $3,739/acre x 13.49 acres (Pond Land 2020) $ 50,439.11 Black Squirrel Fees Filing No. 4 $269,786.51
BLACK SQUIRREL FEES PALERMO FILING NO. 4 -DUE AT PLATTING $269,786.51 MIDDLE CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN
A portion of this site lies within the Middle Creek Drainage Basin boundaries. The total platted area of Filing
No. 4 within Middle Creek Basin is 3.74 acres.
MIDDLE CREEK FEE CALCULATIONS: $24,907/acre x 3.74 acres (Drainage 2020) $ 93,152.18 $1,121/acre x 3.74 acres (Pond Land 2020) $ 4,192.54 Middle Creek Fees Filing No. 4 $97,344.72
Middle Creek Fees Turin Filing No. 4 - due at platting $97,344.72 MONUMENT BRANCH DRAINAGE BASIN
The total platted area of Filing No. 4 within Monument Branch Drainage Basin is 1.31 acres
This basin was officially closed as approved by Drainage Board and City Council at the October 12, 2010
Council meeting. (Reference Resolution #177-10). No fees will be paid for this development within the
Monument Branch Drainage Basin.
Page 12
SUMMARY
Flows for the Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4 site are proposed to outfall into proposed public Full
Spectrum Detention facility constructed with Flying Horse Palermo Filing No. 3. Developed flows from Flying
Horse No. 23 Turin Filing No. 3 & 4 will be treated in this permanent EDB. This is in general conformance with
previously referenced reports. All drainage facilities were sized using the current City of Colorado Springs Drainage
Criteria and will safely discharge storm water runoff to adequate outfalls and will not adversely affect the
downstream and surrounding developments.
PREPARED BY: Classic Consulting Engineers & Surveyors, LLC David L Gibson P.E. Project Manager dlg/1171.52/PDR Turin 3,4,.doc
Page 13
REFERENCES 1. City of Colorado Springs/County of El Paso Drainage Criteria Manual dated May 2014. 2. “Flying Horse Ranch Master Development Drainage Plan MDDP” Classic Consulting Engineers and
Surveyors, dated November 2002, revised December 2003.
3. “Final Drainage Report for Deer Creek at Northgate Filing No. 1” Classic Consulting Engineers and Surveyors, dated February 2001.
4. “Northgate Master Development Drainage Plan (Black Squirrel Creek and Misc. Basins) URS Consultants dated November 1988, Revised August 1989.
APPENDIX
VICINITY MAP
SOILS MAP (S.C.S SURVEY)
Hydrologic Soil Group—El Paso County Area, Colorado
Natural ResourcesConservation Service
Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey
4/7/2020Page 1 of 4
4317
600
4317
700
4317
800
4317
900
4318
000
4318
100
4318
200
4318
300
4318
400
4318
500
4318
600
4317
600
4317
700
4317
800
4317
900
4318
000
4318
100
4318
200
4318
300
4318
400
4318
500
4318
600
518500 518600 518700 518800 518900 519000 519100 519200
518500 518600 518700 518800 518900 519000 519100 519200
39° 0' 58'' N10
4° 4
7' 1
4'' W
39° 0' 58'' N
104°
46'
39'' W
39° 0' 23'' N
104°
47'
14'' W
39° 0' 23'' N
104°
46'
39'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS840 250 500 1000 1500
Feet0 50 100 200 300
MetersMap Scale: 1:5,360 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)
SoilsSoil Rating Polygons
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating LinesA
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating PointsA
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Water FeaturesStreams and Canals
TransportationRails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
BackgroundAerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: El Paso County Area, ColoradoSurvey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 13, 2019
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 19, 2018—Sep 23, 2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Hydrologic Soil Group—El Paso County Area, Colorado
Natural ResourcesConservation Service
Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey
4/7/2020Page 2 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
68 Peyton-Pring complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes
B 9.3 6.8%
93 Tomah-Crowfoot complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
B 127.0 93.2%
Totals for Area of Interest 136.3 100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Hydrologic Soil Group—El Paso County Area, Colorado
Natural ResourcesConservation Service
Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey
4/7/2020Page 3 of 4
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Hydrologic Soil Group—El Paso County Area, Colorado
Natural ResourcesConservation Service
Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey
4/7/2020Page 4 of 4
F.E.M.A. MAP
USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April, 2019.
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Feet
Ü
104°
47'16
.86"W
39°0'53.21"N
104°46'39.40"W
39°0'25.25"N
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, ARRegulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone XFuture Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone XArea with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes. Zone XArea with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D
Channel, Culvert, or Storm SewerLevee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface Elevation
Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect BaselineProfile BaselineHydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Effective LOMRs
Limit of StudyJurisdiction Boundary
Digital Data AvailableNo Digital Data AvailableUnmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standardsThe flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 4/7/2020 at 6:01:38 PM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time.This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes.
Legend
OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERALSTRUCTURES
OTHERFEATURES
MAP PANELS
8
1:6,000
B 20.2
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location.
CALCULATIONS
JOB NAME: FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4JOB NUMBER: 1171.52DATE: 04/17/20CALCULATED BY: DLG
IMPERVIOUS AREA / STREETS
BASINTOTAL
AREA (AC) AREA (AC) C(2) C(5) C(100) AREA (AC) C(2) C(5) C(100) C(2) C(5) C(100) CA(2) CA(5) CA(100)A 1.84 0.33 0.89 0.90 0.96 1.51 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.18 0.23 0.46 0.32 0.42 0.85
A-1 0.44 0.14 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.30 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.30 0.34 0.54 0.13 0.15 0.24B 0.55 0.18 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.37 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.30 0.35 0.55 0.17 0.19 0.30C 8.74 2.50 0.89 0.90 0.96 6.24 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.27 0.31 0.52 2.35 2.75 4.58D 2.52 0.87 0.89 0.90 0.96 1.65 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.32 0.36 0.56 0.81 0.92 1.41E 4.23 1.22 0.89 0.90 0.96 3.01 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.27 0.32 0.53 1.15 1.34 2.22F 3.42 0.62 0.89 0.90 0.96 2.80 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.18 0.23 0.46 0.61 0.78 1.58G 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.78 0.79 0.84H 1.64 1.06 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.58 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.58 0.61 0.74 0.96 1.00 1.22I 9.11 1.53 0.89 0.90 0.96 7.58 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.17 0.22 0.45 1.51 1.98 4.12J 0.28 0.28 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.25 0.25 0.27K 0.23 0.23 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.20 0.21 0.22L 2.96 0.00 0.89 0.90 0.96 2.96 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.06 0.24 1.04M 0.51 0.00 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.51 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.01 0.04 0.18N 13.21 0.22 0.89 0.90 0.96 12.99 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.03 0.09 0.36 0.46 1.24 4.76O 8.04 0.14 0.89 0.90 0.96 7.90 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.04 0.09 0.36 0.28 0.76 2.90
OS-1 0.18 0.00 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.18 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.00 0.01 0.06OS-2 7.64 0.00 0.89 0.90 0.96 7.64 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.15 0.61 2.67OS-3 0.58 0.14 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.44 0.02 0.08 0.35 0.23 0.28 0.50 0.13 0.16 0.29
LANDSCAPE/UNDEVELOPED AREAS WEIGHTED FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT ~ BASIN RUNOFF COEFFICIENT SUMMARY
WEIGHTED CA
Classic ConsultingCopy of CALCS-MSTR-WQCV 2017.xlsx Page 1of 1 4/17/2020
JOB NAME: FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4JOB NUMBER:DATE:CALC'D BY:
Tc=L/V
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT ~ BASIN RUNOFF SUMMARYSTREET / CHANNEL FLOW Tc
BASIN CA(2) CA(5) CA(100) C(5) Length Height Tc Length Slope Velocity Tc TOTAL I(2) I(5) I(100) Q(2) Q(5) Q(100)(ft) (ft) (min) (ft) (%) (fps) (min) (min) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
A 0.32 0.42 0.85 0.08 160 10 12.7 570 2.0% 2.8 3.4 16.1 2.73 3.42 5.74 1 1 5
A-1 0.13 0.15 0.24 0.08 180 10 14.0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 14.0 2.89 3.62 6.08 0 1 1
B 0.17 0.19 0.30 0.08 100 12 8.1 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 9.9 3.31 4.15 6.96 1 1 2
C 2.35 2.75 4.58 0.08 100 4 11.7 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 13.4 2.94 3.69 6.19 7 10 28
D 0.81 0.92 1.41 0.08 50 2 8.2 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 10.0 3.29 4.13 6.93 2.7 4 10
E 1.15 1.34 2.22 0.08 100 4 11.7 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 13.4 2.94 3.69 6.19 3 5 14
F 0.61 0.78 1.58 0.08 100 4 11.7 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 13.4 2.94 3.69 6.19 1.8 3 10
G 0.78 0.79 0.84 0.08 10 1 2.7 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 5.0 4.12 5.17 8.68 3 4 7
H 0.96 1.00 1.22 0.08 100 12 8.1 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 9.9 3.31 4.15 6.96 3 4 8
I 1.51 1.98 4.12 0.08 100 4 11.7 300 4.0% 4.0 1.3 12.9 2.99 3.75 6.29 4.5 7 26
J 0.25 0.25 0.27 0.08 10 1 2.7 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 5.0 4.12 5.17 8.68 1.03 1 2
K 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.08 10 1 2.7 300 2.0% 2.8 1.8 5.0 4.12 5.17 8.68 1 1 2
L 0.06 0.24 1.04 0.08 100 12 8.1 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 8.1 3.54 4.44 7.46 0 1 8
M 0.01 0.04 0.18 0.08 50 6 5.7 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 5.7 3.96 4.96 8.33 0 0.2 1
N 0.46 1.24 4.76 0.08 300 75 11.0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 11.0 3.18 3.98 6.69 1 5 32
O 0.28 0.76 2.90 0.08 300 75 11.0 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 11.0 3.18 3.98 6.69 1 3 19
OS-1 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.08 50 4 6.6 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 6.6 3.80 4.76 8.00 0 0.1 1
OS-2 0.15 0.61 2.67 0.08 300 30 14.9 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 14.9 2.82 3.53 5.92 0 2 16
OS-3 0.13 0.16 0.29 0.08 100 8 9.3 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0 9.3 3.38 4.24 7.12 0 1 2
INTENSITY TOTAL FLOWS OVERLANDWEIGHTED
1171.5204/17/20DLG
Classic ConsultingCopy of CALCS-MSTR-WQCV 2017.xlsx Page 1of 1 4/17/2020
JOB NAME: FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4JOB NUMBER: 1171.52DATE: 04/17/20CALCULATED BY: DLG
DesignPoint(s) Contributing Basins Equivalent
CA(5)Equivalent
CA(100)Maximum
Tc I(5) I(100) Q(5) Q(100)Inlet Size
1 BASIN A, A-1 & OS-3 (ALSO BASIN O,N Q FH 25) 1.64 2.43 16.1 3.42 5.74 6 14 6' D-10-R
2 BASIN B (ALSO BASIN R FH 25) 0.66 0.80 9.9 4.15 6.96 3 6 4' D-10-R
3 BASIN C 2.75 4.58 13.4 3.69 6.19 10 28 12' D-10-R
4 BASIN D 0.92 1.41 10.0 4.13 6.93 4 10 4' D-10-R
5 BASIN E, BASIN F, BASIN G 2.91 4.64 13.4 3.69 6.19 11 29 12' D-10-R
6 BASIN H 1.00 1.22 9.9 4.15 6.96 4 8 4' D-10-R
7 BASIN I, BASIN OS-1 2.00 4.18 12.9 3.75 6.29 7 26 16' D-10-R
Intensity FlowFINAL DRAINAGE REPORT ~ SURFACE ROUTING SUMMARY
Classic ConsultingCopy of CALCS-MSTR-WQCV 2017.xlsx Page 1of 1 4/17/2020
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Check boxes are not applicable in SUMP conditions
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 1 EX Inlet
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 1 EX Inlet 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR
Type of Inlet Type =
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from above) alocal = 4.00 4.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 8.0 10.9 inches
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 6.00 6.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 8.00 8.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 8.00 8.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 81.00 81.00 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
Low Head Performance Reduction (Calculated) MINOR MAJOR
Depth for Grate Midwidth dGrate = N/A N/A ft
Depth for Curb Opening Weir Equation dCurb = 0.54 0.78 ft
Combination Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCombination = 0.94 1.00
Curb Opening Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCurb = 1.00 1.00
Grated Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFGrate = N/A N/A
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 12.5 18.8 cfsInlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms(>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 6.0 14.0 cfs
Colorado Springs D-10-R
INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATIONVersion 4.05 Released March 2017
H-VertH-Curb
W
Lo (C)
Lo (G)
W o
WP
Colorado Springs D-10-R
Override Depths
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 1 EX Inlet 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = 25.6 109.0 cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 1 STREET CAP
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 1 STREET CAP 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = 25.6 109.0 cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 2 STREET CAP
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 2 STREET CAP 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Check boxes are not applicable in SUMP conditions
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 2 EX INLET
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 2 EX INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR
Type of Inlet Type =
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from above) alocal = 4.00 4.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 8.0 10.9 inches
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 4.00 4.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 8.00 8.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 8.00 8.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 81.00 81.00 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
Low Head Performance Reduction (Calculated) MINOR MAJOR
Depth for Grate Midwidth dGrate = N/A N/A ft
Depth for Curb Opening Weir Equation dCurb = 0.54 0.78 ft
Combination Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCombination = 1.00 1.00
Curb Opening Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCurb = 1.00 1.00
Grated Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFGrate = N/A N/A
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 9.1 12.0 cfsInlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms(>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 3.0 6.0 cfs
Colorado Springs D-10-R
INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATIONVersion 4.05 Released March 2017
H-VertH-Curb
W
Lo (C)
Lo (G)
W o
WP
Colorado Springs D-10-R
Override Depths
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 2 EX INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 7.5 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 6.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 15.8 ft
Gutter Width W = 0.83 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.100 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 15.8 15.8 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 6.0 7.8 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = 11.8 44.4 cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 3 STREET CAP
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 3 STREET CAP 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 7.5 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 17.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 17.0 17.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 9.8 inches
Check boxes are not applicable in SUMP conditions
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 3 INLET
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 3 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR
Type of Inlet Type =
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from above) alocal = 4.00 4.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 8.0 9.8 inches
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 12.00 12.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 8.00 8.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 8.00 8.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 81.00 81.00 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
Low Head Performance Reduction (Calculated) MINOR MAJOR
Depth for Grate Midwidth dGrate = N/A N/A ft
Depth for Curb Opening Weir Equation dCurb = 0.54 0.69 ft
Combination Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCombination = 0.75 0.92
Curb Opening Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCurb = 0.97 1.00
Grated Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFGrate = N/A N/A
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 20.3 30.3 cfsInlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms(>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 10.0 28.0 cfs
Colorado Springs D-10-R
INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATIONVersion 4.05 Released March 2017
H-VertH-Curb
W
Lo (C)
Lo (G)
W o
WP
Colorado Springs D-10-R
Override Depths
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 3 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 7.5 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 6.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 15.8 ft
Gutter Width W = 0.83 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.100 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 15.8 15.8 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 6.0 7.8 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = 11.8 44.4 cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 4 STREET CAP
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 4 STREET CAP 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 7.5 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 17.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 17.0 17.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 6.0 9.8 inches
Check boxes are not applicable in SUMP conditions
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 4 INLET
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 4 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR
Type of Inlet Type =
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from above) alocal = 4.00 4.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 6.0 9.8 inches
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 4.00 4.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 8.00 8.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 8.00 8.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 81.00 81.00 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
Low Head Performance Reduction (Calculated) MINOR MAJOR
Depth for Grate Midwidth dGrate = N/A N/A ft
Depth for Curb Opening Weir Equation dCurb = 0.37 0.69 ft
Combination Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCombination = 0.85 1.00
Curb Opening Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCurb = 1.00 1.00
Grated Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFGrate = N/A N/A
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 5.4 11.4 cfsInlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms(>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 4.0 10.0 cfs
Colorado Springs D-10-R
INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATIONVersion 4.05 Released March 2017
H-VertH-Curb
W
Lo (C)
Lo (G)
W o
WP
Colorado Springs D-10-R
Override Depths
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 4 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = 25.6 109.0 cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 5 STREET CAP
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 5 STREET CAP 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Check boxes are not applicable in SUMP conditions
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 5 INLET
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 5 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR
Type of Inlet Type =
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from above) alocal = 4.00 4.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 8.0 10.9 inches
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 12.00 12.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 8.00 8.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 8.00 8.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 81.00 81.00 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
Low Head Performance Reduction (Calculated) MINOR MAJOR
Depth for Grate Midwidth dGrate = N/A N/A ft
Depth for Curb Opening Weir Equation dCurb = 0.54 0.78 ft
Combination Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCombination = 0.75 1.00
Curb Opening Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCurb = 0.97 1.00
Grated Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFGrate = N/A N/A
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 20.3 35.2 cfsInlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms(>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 11.0 29.0 cfs
Colorado Springs D-10-R
INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATIONVersion 4.05 Released March 2017
H-VertH-Curb
W
Lo (C)
Lo (G)
W o
WP
Colorado Springs D-10-R
Override Depths
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 5 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = 25.6 109.0 cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 6 STREET CAP
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 6 STREET CAP 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 12.0 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 21.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 21.0 21.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 10.9 inches
Check boxes are not applicable in SUMP conditions
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 6 INLET
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 6 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR
Type of Inlet Type =
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from above) alocal = 4.00 4.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 8.0 10.9 inches
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 4.00 4.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 8.00 8.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 8.00 8.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 81.00 81.00 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
Low Head Performance Reduction (Calculated) MINOR MAJOR
Depth for Grate Midwidth dGrate = N/A N/A ft
Depth for Curb Opening Weir Equation dCurb = 0.54 0.78 ft
Combination Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCombination = 1.00 1.00
Curb Opening Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCurb = 1.00 1.00
Grated Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFGrate = N/A N/A
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 9.1 12.0 cfsInlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms(>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 4.0 8.0 cfs
Colorado Springs D-10-R
INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATIONVersion 4.05 Released March 2017
H-VertH-Curb
W
Lo (C)
Lo (G)
W o
WP
Colorado Springs D-10-R
Override Depths
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 6 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 7.5 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 6.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 15.8 ft
Gutter Width W = 0.83 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.100 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.040 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 15.8 15.8 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 6.0 7.9 inches
Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = 16.7 37.3 cfs
Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than the design flow given on sheet 'Inlet Management'
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 7 STREET CAP
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 7 STREET CAP 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Project:Inlet ID:
Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells)
Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb TBACK = 7.5 ft
Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) SBACK = 0.020 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nBACK = 0.020
Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line HCURB = 8.00 inches
Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown TCROWN = 17.0 ft
Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft
Street Transverse Slope SX = 0.020 ft/ft
Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or 0.083 ft/ft) SW = 0.065 ft/ft
Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition SO = 0.000 ft/ft
Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between 0.012 and 0.020) nSTREET = 0.016
Minor Storm Major Storm
Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm TMAX = 17.0 17.0 ft
Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm dMAX = 8.0 9.8 inches
Check boxes are not applicable in SUMP conditions
MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm
MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Qallow = SUMP SUMP cfs
Version 4.05 Released March 2017
ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm)
(Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread)FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4
DP 7 INLET
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 7 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR
Type of Inlet Type =
Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from above) alocal = 4.00 4.00 inches
Number of Unit Inlets (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1
Water Depth at Flowline (outside of local depression) Ponding Depth = 6.0 8.5 inches
Grate Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Grate Lo (G) = N/A N/A feet
Width of a Unit Grate Wo = N/A N/A feet
Area Opening Ratio for a Grate (typical values 0.15-0.90) Aratio = N/A N/A
Clogging Factor for a Single Grate (typical value 0.50 - 0.70) Cf (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.15 - 3.60) Cw (G) = N/A N/A
Grate Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.80) Co (G) = N/A N/A
Curb Opening Information MINOR MAJOR
Length of a Unit Curb Opening Lo (C) = 16.00 16.00 feet
Height of Vertical Curb Opening in Inches Hvert = 8.00 8.00 inches
Height of Curb Orifice Throat in Inches Hthroat = 8.00 8.00 inches
Angle of Throat (see USDCM Figure ST-5) Theta = 81.00 81.00 degrees
Side Width for Depression Pan (typically the gutter width of 2 feet) Wp = 2.00 2.00 feet
Clogging Factor for a Single Curb Opening (typical value 0.10) Cf (C) = 0.10 0.10
Curb Opening Weir Coefficient (typical value 2.3-3.7) Cw (C) = 3.60 3.60
Curb Opening Orifice Coefficient (typical value 0.60 - 0.70) Co (C) = 0.67 0.67
Low Head Performance Reduction (Calculated) MINOR MAJOR
Depth for Grate Midwidth dGrate = N/A N/A ft
Depth for Curb Opening Weir Equation dCurb = 0.37 0.58 ft
Combination Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCombination = 0.57 0.80
Curb Opening Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFCurb = 0.79 0.91
Grated Inlet Performance Reduction Factor for Long Inlets RFGrate = N/A N/A
MINOR MAJOR
Total Inlet Interception Capacity (assumes clogged condition) Qa = 12.0 27.2 cfsInlet Capacity IS GOOD for Minor and Major Storms(>Q PEAK) Q PEAK REQUIRED = 7.0 26.0 cfs
Colorado Springs D-10-R
INLET IN A SUMP OR SAG LOCATIONVersion 4.05 Released March 2017
H-VertH-Curb
W
Lo (C)
Lo (G)
W o
WP
Colorado Springs D-10-R
Override Depths
UD-Inlet_v4.05.xlsm, DP 7 INLET 4/17/2020, 10:59 AM
JOB NAME: FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FIL 3 & 4JOB NUMBER: 1171.52DATE: 04/17/20CALCULATED BY: DLG
* PIPES ARE LISTED AT MAXIMUM SIZE REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE Q100 FLOWS AT MINIMUM GRADE.REFER TO INDIVIDUAL PIPE SHEETS FOR HYDRAULIC INFORMATION.
Pipe Run Contributing Basins EquivalentCA(5)
EquivalentCA(100)
MaximumTc I(5) I(100) Q(5) Q(100)
Pipe Size*1 DP 3 2.75 4.58 13.42 3.69 6.19 10 28 30" RCP
2 DP 4 0.92 1.41 10.01 4.13 6.93 4 10 18" RCP
3 PIPE 1 & PIPE 2 3.66 6.00 13.42 3.69 6.19 14 37 30" RCP
4 DP 5 2.91 4.64 13.4 3.69 6.19 11 29 30" RCP
5 DP 6 1.00 1.22 9.9 4.15 6.96 4 8 18" RCP
6 PIPE 3, PIPE 4, PIPE 5 7.58 11.86 13.4 3.69 6.19 28 73 42" RCP
7 DP 7 2.00 4.18 12.9 3.75 6.29 7 26 30" RCP
8 PIPE 6, PIPE 7 9.58 16.05 15.9 3.43 5.76 33 92 42" RCP
Intensity FlowFINAL DRAINAGE REPORT ~ PIPE ROUTING SUMMARY
Classic ConsultingCopy of CALCS-MSTR-WQCV 2017.xlsx Page 1of 1 4/17/2020
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 1Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein30.0Diametercfs28.00Discharge
Results
in18.2Normal Depthft²3.1Flow Areaft4.5Wetted Perimeterin8.4Hydraulic Radiusft2.44Top Widthin21.7Critical Depth%60.6Percent Fullft/ft0.006Critical Slopeft/s8.99Velocityft1.26Velocity Headft2.77Specific Energy
1.404Froude Numbercfs44.12Maximum Dischargecfs41.01Discharge Fullft/ft0.005Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%60.6Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin18.2Normal Depthin21.7Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.006Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 2Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein18.0Diametercfs10.00Discharge
Results
in14.0Normal Depthft²1.5Flow Areaft3.2Wetted Perimeterin5.5Hydraulic Radiusft1.24Top Widthin14.6Critical Depth%78.0Percent Fullft/ft0.009Critical Slopeft/s6.77Velocityft0.71Velocity Headft1.88Specific Energy
1.094Froude Numbercfs11.30Maximum Dischargecfs10.50Discharge Fullft/ft0.009Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%78.0Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin14.0Normal Depthin14.6Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.009Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 3Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein30.0Diametercfs37.00Discharge
Results
in22.3Normal Depthft²3.9Flow Areaft5.2Wetted Perimeterin9.0Hydraulic Radiusft2.18Top Widthin24.7Critical Depth%74.3Percent Fullft/ft0.008Critical Slopeft/s9.46Velocityft1.39Velocity Headft3.25Specific Energy
1.246Froude Numbercfs44.12Maximum Dischargecfs41.01Discharge Fullft/ft0.008Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%74.3Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin22.3Normal Depthin24.7Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.008Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 4Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein30.0Diametercfs29.00Discharge
Results
in18.6Normal Depthft²3.2Flow Areaft4.5Wetted Perimeterin8.5Hydraulic Radiusft2.43Top Widthin22.0Critical Depth%62.1Percent Fullft/ft0.006Critical Slopeft/s9.06Velocityft1.28Velocity Headft2.83Specific Energy
1.391Froude Numbercfs44.12Maximum Dischargecfs41.01Discharge Fullft/ft0.005Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%62.1Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin18.6Normal Depthin22.0Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.006Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 5Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein18.0Diametercfs8.00Discharge
Results
in11.8Normal Depthft²1.2Flow Areaft2.8Wetted Perimeterin5.2Hydraulic Radiusft1.43Top Widthin13.2Critical Depth%65.3Percent Fullft/ft0.007Critical Slopeft/s6.54Velocityft0.67Velocity Headft1.64Specific Energy
1.246Froude Numbercfs11.30Maximum Dischargecfs10.50Discharge Fullft/ft0.006Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%65.3Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin11.8Normal Depthin13.2Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.007Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 6Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein42.0Diametercfs73.00Discharge
Results
in26.5Normal Depthft²6.4Flow Areaft6.4Wetted Perimeterin12.0Hydraulic Radiusft3.38Top Widthin32.1Critical Depth%63.2Percent Fullft/ft0.006Critical Slopeft/s11.40Velocityft2.02Velocity Headft4.23Specific Energy
1.459Froude Numbercfs108.22Maximum Dischargecfs100.60Discharge Fullft/ft0.005Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%63.2Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin26.5Normal Depthin32.1Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.006Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 7Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein30.0Diametercfs26.00Discharge
Results
in17.3Normal Depthft²2.9Flow Areaft4.3Wetted Perimeterin8.2Hydraulic Radiusft2.47Top Widthin20.9Critical Depth%57.8Percent Fullft/ft0.006Critical Slopeft/s8.84Velocityft1.22Velocity Headft2.66Specific Energy
1.429Froude Numbercfs44.12Maximum Dischargecfs41.01Discharge Fullft/ft0.004Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%57.8Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin17.3Normal Depthin20.9Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.006Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Worksheet for PIPE RUN - 8Project Description
Manning FormulaFriction Method
Normal DepthSolve For
Input Data
0.013Roughness Coefficientft/ft0.010Channel Slopein42.0Diametercfs92.00Discharge
Results
in31.6Normal Depthft²7.8Flow Areaft7.3Wetted Perimeterin12.7Hydraulic Radiusft3.02Top Widthin35.6Critical Depth%75.2Percent Fullft/ft0.008Critical Slopeft/s11.86Velocityft2.18Velocity Headft4.82Specific Energy
1.305Froude Numbercfs108.22Maximum Dischargecfs100.60Discharge Fullft/ft0.008Slope Full
SupercriticalFlow Type
GVF Input Data
in0.0Downstream Depthft0.0Length
0Number Of Steps
GVF Output Data
in0.0Upstream DepthN/AProfile Description
ft0.00Profile Headloss%0.0Average End Depth Over Rise%75.2Normal Depth Over Riseft/sInfinityDownstream Velocityft/sInfinityUpstream Velocityin31.6Normal Depthin35.6Critical Depthft/ft0.010Channel Slopeft/ft0.008Critical Slope
Page 1 of 127 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666
4/17/2020
FlowMaster[10.02.00.01]
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterPIPES.fm8
Sheet 1 of 1
Designer:
Company:
Date:
Project:
Location:
1. Design Discharge
A) 2-Year Peak Flow Rate of the Area Draining to the Grass Buffer Q2 = 1.0 cfs
2. Minimum Width of Grass Buffer WG = 20 ft
3. Length of Grass Buffer (14' or greater recommended) LG = 1,900 ft
4. Buffer Slope (in the direction of flow, not to exceed 0.1 ft / ft) SG = 0.100 ft / ft
5. Flow Characteristics (sheet or concentrated)
A) Does runoff flow into the grass buffer across the entire width of the buffer?
B) Watershed Flow Length FL= 100 ft
C) Interface Slope (normal to flow) SI= 0.010 ft / ft
D) Type of Flow SHEET FLOW Sheet Flow: FL * SI < 1 Concentrated Flow: FL * SI > 1
6. Flow Distribution for Concentrated Flows
7 Soil Preparation(Describe soil amendment)
8 Vegetation (Check the type used or describe "Other")
9. Irrigation(*Select None if existing buffer area has 80% vegetation AND will not be disturbed during construction.)
10. Outflow Collection (Check the type used or describe "Other")
Notes:
Design Procedure Form: Grass Buffer (GB)
DLG
CLASSIC CONSULTING
FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FILING NO. 3, 4
April 17, 2020
UD-BMP (Version 3.06, November 2016)
BASIN N GRASS BUFFER
Existing Xeric Turf GrassIrrigated Turf GrassOther (Explain):
Choose One
Choose OneGrass SwaleStreet GutterStorm Sewer InletOther (Explain):
None (sheet flow)Slotted CurbingLevel Spreader
Choose One
Other (Explain):
Choose OneYes No
Choose One
PermanentNone*
Temporary
UD-BMP_v3.06 BASIN N.xlsm, GB 4/17/2020, 11:03 AM
Sheet 1 of 1
Designer:
Company:
Date:
Project:
Location:
1. Design Discharge
A) 2-Year Peak Flow Rate of the Area Draining to the Grass Buffer Q2 = 1.0 cfs
2. Minimum Width of Grass Buffer WG = 20 ft
3. Length of Grass Buffer (14' or greater recommended) LG = 1,200 ft
4. Buffer Slope (in the direction of flow, not to exceed 0.1 ft / ft) SG = 0.100 ft / ft
5. Flow Characteristics (sheet or concentrated)
A) Does runoff flow into the grass buffer across the entire width of the buffer?
B) Watershed Flow Length FL= 100 ft
C) Interface Slope (normal to flow) SI= 0.010 ft / ft
D) Type of Flow SHEET FLOW Sheet Flow: FL * SI < 1 Concentrated Flow: FL * SI > 1
6. Flow Distribution for Concentrated Flows
7 Soil Preparation(Describe soil amendment)
8 Vegetation (Check the type used or describe "Other")
9. Irrigation(*Select None if existing buffer area has 80% vegetation AND will not be disturbed during construction.)
10. Outflow Collection (Check the type used or describe "Other")
Notes:
Design Procedure Form: Grass Buffer (GB)
DLG
CLASSIC CONSULTING
FLYING HORSE NO. 23 TURIN FILING NO. 1
April 17, 2020
UD-BMP (Version 3.06, November 2016)
BASIN O GRASS BUFFER
Existing Xeric Turf GrassIrrigated Turf GrassOther (Explain):
Choose One
Choose OneGrass SwaleStreet GutterStorm Sewer InletOther (Explain):
None (sheet flow)Slotted CurbingLevel Spreader
Choose One
Other (Explain):
Choose OneYes No
Choose One
PermanentNone*
Temporary
UD-BMP_v3.06 BASIN O.xlsm, GB 4/17/2020, 11:03 AM
Worksheet Protected
User Input
Calculated cells Designer:
Company:
***Design Storm: 1‐Hour Rain Depth WQCV Event 0.53 inches Date:
***Minor Storm: 1‐Hour Rain Depth 5‐Year Event 1.19 inches Project:
***Major Storm: 1‐Hour Rain Depth 100‐Year Event 2.52 inches Location:
Optional User Defined Storm CUHP
(CUHP) NOAA 1 Hour Rainfall Depth and
Frequency for User Defined Storm100‐Year Event 2.52
Max Intensity for Optional User Defined Storm 2.51496
SITE INFORMATION (USER‐INPUT)
Sub‐basin Identifier B C D E F G H I
Receiving Pervious Area Soil Type Loamy Sand Loamy Sand Loamy Sand Loamy Sand Loamy Sand Loamy Sand Loamy Sand Loamy Sand
Total Area (ac., Sum of DCIA, UIA, RPA, & SPA) 0.550 8.740 2.520 4.230 3.420 0.880 1.640 9.110
Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA, acres) 0.180 2.000 0.680 0.860 0.490 0.880 1.060 1.210
Unconnected Impervious Area (UIA, acres) 0.000 0.500 0.190 0.360 0.130 0.000 0.000 0.320
Receiving Pervious Area (RPA, acres) 0.000 5.020 1.650 3.010 2.800 0.000 0.000 6.330
Separate Pervious Area (SPA, acres) 0.370 1.220 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.580 1.250
C C C C C C C C
CALCULATED RESULTS (OUTPUT)
Total Calculated Area (ac, check against input) 0.550 8.740 2.520 4.230 3.420 0.880 1.640 9.110
Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA, %) 32.7% 22.9% 27.0% 20.3% 14.3% 100.0% 64.6% 13.3%
Unconnected Impervious Area (UIA, %) 0.0% 5.7% 7.5% 8.5% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5%
Receiving Pervious Area (RPA, %) 0.0% 57.4% 65.5% 71.2% 81.9% 0.0% 0.0% 69.5%
Separate Pervious Area (SPA, %) 67.3% 14.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.4% 13.7%
AR (RPA / UIA) 0.000 10.040 8.684 8.361 21.538 0.000 0.000 19.781
Ia Check 1.000 0.090 0.100 0.110 0.040 1.000 1.000 0.050
f / I for WQCV Event: 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
f / I for 5‐Year Event: 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
f / I for 100‐Year Event: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
f / I for Optional User Defined Storm CUHP: 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
IRF for WQCV Event: 1.00 0.19 0.22 0.24 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.11
IRF for 5‐Year Event: 1.00 0.36 0.40 0.44 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.20
IRF for 100‐Year Event: 1.00 0.39 0.43 0.48 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.22
IRF for Optional User Defined Storm CUHP: 1.00 0.39 0.43 0.48 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.22
Total Site Imperviousness: Itotal 32.7% 28.6% 34.5% 28.8% 18.1% 100.0% 64.6% 16.8%
Effective Imperviousness for WQCV Event: 32.7% 24.0% 28.6% 22.4% 14.7% 100.0% 64.6% 13.7%
Effective Imperviousness for 5‐Year Event: 32.7% 25.0% 30.0% 24.1% 14.9% 100.0% 64.6% 14.0%
Effective Imperviousness for 100‐Year Event: 32.7% 25.1% 30.2% 24.4% 15.0% 100.0% 64.6% 14.0%
32.7% 25.1% 30.2% 24.4% 15.0% 100.0% 64.6% 14.0%
LID / EFFECTIVE IMPERVIOUSNESS CREDITS
WQCV Event CREDIT: Reduce Detention By: 0.0% 10.8% 10.8% 15.4% 14.9% 0.0% 0.0% 14.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
This line only for 10‐Year Event N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
100‐Year Event CREDIT**: Reduce Detention By: 0.0% 12.8% 12.8% 16.2% 19.2% 0.0% 0.0% 18.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
User Defined CUHP CREDIT: Reduce Detention By: 0.0% 8.7% 9.2% 11.0% 11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 10.7%
Total Site Imperviousness: 28.5% Notes:
Total Site Effective Imperviousness for WQCV Event: 24.5% * Use Green‐Ampt average infiltration rate values from Table 3‐3.
Total Site Effective Imperviousness for 5‐Year Event: 25.3% ** Flood control detention volume credits based on empirical equations from Storage Chapter of USDCM.Total Site Effective Imperviousness for 100‐Year Event: 25.4% *** Method assumes that 1‐hour rainfall depth is equivalent to 1‐hour intensity for calculation purposed
25.4%
Site‐Level Low Impact Development (LID) Design Effective Impervious CalculatorLID Credit by Impervious Reduction Factor (IRF) Method
Classic Consulting
April 15, 2020
Flying Horse No. 23 Turin Fil. 3 & 4
PALERMO FIL 3 EDB
dlg
RPA Treatment Type: Conveyance (C),
Volume (V), or Permeable Pavement (PP)
UD‐BMP (Version 3.06, November 2016)
Total Site Effective Imperviousness for Optional User Defined Storm CUHP:
Effective Imperviousness for Optional User Defined Storm CUHP:
UD-BMP_v3.06.xlsm, IRF 4/17/2020, 11:04 AM
DRAINAGE MAP
FH 23OS-1
FH PALERMOFIL. 3, 4, 5