Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RPB
Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) Phase III- Recap of Year 1 and Forecast to 2020
May 11, 2017
RAMAN BIRK, MSc.REGIONAL MANAGER OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESPACIFIC REGION
2
Overview
• PSPC roles in federal contaminated sites• Overview of FCSAP and current status –
Phase III and Federal Infrastructure Initiative
• Focus on Pacific Region – Upcoming projects and successful project profiles
• Questions?
3
Overview: PSPC Roles in Contaminated Sites
• Custodian: responsible for management of its inventory – approximately $150M program (16-17 through 19-20)
• Expert Support: develop guidance for usage by federal community, address procurement issues, share innovative, green, sustainable approaches, and inform private sector of forecasted federal need for support
• Common Service Provider: provide technical advice, procurement support, and project management services to other federal custodians
4
Overview: Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan
• 15-year program to address federal contaminated sites involving up to 17 federal departments, agencies, and consolidated Crown corporations (custodians) which share the costs for site assessment and remediation
• $4.54B committed in Budgets 2003, 2004, 2009, 2011, 2015, and 2016
• $2.98B approved for Phase I and II (2005-06 to 2015-16)
• $1.35B approved for Phase III (2016-17 to 2019-20)
• $217M allocated in Budget 2016 for accelerated activities in 2016-17 and 2017-18
5
Overview: Federal Contaminated Sites Action PlanObjectives• Reduce risks to human health and the environment; and • Reduce liability in the Public Accounts of Canada related to contaminated sites
Eligibility for FCSAP remediation funding• Assessed sites classified as high priority (Class 1) or medium priority
(Class 2) and• Legacy contamination that occurred on federal sites prior to 1998• Former mining sites in the North where companies have declared
bankruptcy
6
Overview: Program Partners in Phase III• Custodian:
• Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada• Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada• Correctional Service Canada• Environment and Climate Change Canada • Fisheries and Oceans Canada• The Jacques Cartier and Champlain
Bridges Incorporated • National Capital Commission • National Defence• National Research Council• Natural Resources Canada • Parks Canada Agency • Public Services and Procurement Canada• Transport Canada• VIA Rail Canada Inc.
• Expert Support:• Environment and Climate Change Canada • Health Canada• Fisheries and Oceans Canada• Public Services and Procurement Canada
• Secretariat• Environment and Climate Change Canada
• Support to Secretariat and Policy Advice • Treasury Board Secretariat
7
FCSAP Results: Contaminated Sites 2005 to 2016
4,609
11,841 11,510 10,809
7,434 6,9584,929 4,014
3,020 2,606 2,353
3,415
4,415 4,6444,243
5,189 5,530
4,9934,700
4,4354,252 3,869
1,137
1,396 1,430
1,100
1,309 1,407
1,3341,380
1,2421,065
1,030
800
665 527
367
451 462
518488
467468
441
1,129
1,630 2,5053,825
5,215
7,66010,480
11,80013,427 14,429 15,381
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16
Num
ber o
f Site
s
Suspected Active in Assessment Active in Remediation Active in Long Term Monitoring Closed
$168*
$192 $191 $219$310
$373 $209$222 $309 $270
*$ million, FCSAP assessment and remediation expenditures
(incl. cost share) $260
8
FCSAP Results: Achievements to Date
Since 2005• 14,800 person-year jobs created• Targeted the sites with highest risks and liabilities e.g. Giant and Faro Mines• Distant Early Warning (DEW) Line sites
Phase I(2005-2011)
Phase II(2011-2016)
Better understanding of risks by assessingfederal contaminated sites
9,431 sites 1,614 sites
Reduced risks by remediating sites 1,412 sites 583 sitesLiability reduction from remediation $1.0B $1.2BLiability increase from new sites and improved cost estimates
$2.7B $2.6B
* Estimated liability in 2016 for FCSAP-eligible sites is $3.96B
9
Location of FCSAP Phase III Assessment Sites
10
Location of FCSAP Phase III Remediation Sites
11
PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons), 29%
BTEXs, 4%
PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon), 23%
Metal, metalloid, and organometallic, 30%
PCBs And PCDD/Fs, 2%
Other inorganics, 2%
Other organics, 2%Other Physical/Chemical,
2% Other, 2%
FCSI Inventory: Most Commonly Reported Contaminant Types
Petroleum hydrocarbons and PAH's
Oxygen depleting substances
Toxic organics
Nuisance substances
PHCs (petroleum hydrocarbons)
BTEXs (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene)
PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon)
Metal, metalloid, and organometallic
Microorganism
PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyl) and PCDD/Fs(polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/dibenzofuran)Pesticides
Halogenated Hydrocarbon
Isotopes
Energetics
Biological/chemical warfare agents
Other inorganics
Other organics
Other Physical/Chemical (pH, temperature, dissolvedsolids, turbidity, etc.)Other
Source: Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory, January 2017Unlabelled ContaminantsEach 1% or Less Of Total
12
Number of Phase III and Stimulus FCSAP Funded Sites- By Custodian
13
Number of Phase III and Stimulus FCSAP Funded Sites- By Location
14
FCSAP Phase III and Stimulus Expenditures: BC and YT Details 2 Year Forecast
Location of Work 2 Year ForecastBritish Columbia Assessment $ 11.6 MYukon Assessment $ 7.3 MBritish Columbia Remediation $ 162.8 MYukon Remediation $ 70.3 M
Custodians with largest funding envelopes:- INAC- DND- PSPC- TC
15
ES MAJOR PSPC PROJECTS IN PACIFC 2016-2020
– DND Esquimalt Harbour Remediation Project
– PSPC Alaska Highway Program –Maintenance Camps and Current/Former Alignments
– Transport Canada (Pacific Region) – Middle Harbour (Upland and Sediments)
– Transport Canada (Prairie-Northern Region)-Watson Lake and Whitehorse Airports
– Esquimalt Graving Dock - environmental management and compliance
– ECCC – Pacific Environmental Centre
16
ESQUIMALT HARBOUR – PSPC EGD AND DND
EGD
DND
17
EGD WATERLOT SEABED POST-PHASE 1 REMEDIATION
18
EGD WATERLOT REMEDIATION- PHASE 2
Demolish Wood Pile Area of South Jetty
Re-Drive Sheetpile Wall, Dredging,
Transport and Disposal
Seabed Armouring and Extract Sheetpile Wall
~ 9,200m2 $5.4M ~40,000 m3 ~ $19.5M ~12,700 m2 ~ $0.8M
19
EGD WATERLOT SEABED POST-PHASE 2 REMEDIATION
20
EGD WATERLOT SEABED POST-PHASE 2 REMEDIATION
21
ROCK BAY REMEDIATION PROJECT
• Coal gasification facility from 1862-1952 resulted in contaminated soil & sediment• Key project tasks:
– Installing a temporary dam across the Bay and draining sea water– Installing support walls along property boundary– Excavation and barging of contaminated material to treatment facility
• 91,000 tonnes of soil & sediment removed from Rock Bay and surrounding foreshore• Project cost: $48.9 M• Result: Property was sold Dec 6 2016 to a company owned by local Songhees and
Esquimalt First Nations
22
DND ESQUIMALT HARBOUR REMEDIATION PROJECT
– EHRP Definition Phase Substantive Cost Estimate $18 M from 2015/16-2017/18
– EHRP Implementation Phase – Estimated at $155 M from 2018/19-2019/20
– Additional funding for F/G and D Jetty - $25M for 2016/17
– ES to manage DND’s “CS program and FNs support” and be responsible for distribution of work to PWGSC and DCC
– DND will be utilizing both PSPC and DCC as Contracting Authorities with a concept of 50:50 share between two service providers
23
Summary
• PSPC is an important program partner in the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan• Current forecast indicates more than $1.6B will be spent during the FY16-17 through
FY19-20• Significant projects in Pacific Region (BC and YT) include PEC Site CFB Esquimalt,
Alaska Highway sites, and Faro Mine• Current FCSAP program approved until March 31, 2020 so discussions concerning
successor program have been initiated
24
Thank You! - Questions?
More information:
Federal Contaminated Sites Web portalwww.federalcontaminatedsites.gc.ca
Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fcsi-rscf