Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Contract ENER/C3/2018-447/05
Feasibility study EPBD article 19a
2nd stakeholder meeting
Brussels, 28 November 2019
ENER/C3/2018-447/05
Policy optionsBuilding renovation passport
Jonathan Volt (BPIE)
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 2
Outline
1. Direct policy measures
2. Types of supportive policy measures
3. Overview of six selected policy packages
4. Deep dive: explaining the BRP impact
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 3
3 main policy options for the EU to consider
ENER/C3/2018-447/054
LEAVE TO MEMBER STATES
Policy package 1
(Soft)
Policy package 2
(Stringent)
COMMON REFERENCE FRAMEWORK
Policy package 3
(Soft)
Policy package 4
(Stringent)
FUTURE EPBD REQUIREMENT
Policy package 5
(Soft)
Policy package 6
(Stringent)
Types of measures
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 5
Policy package
Direct measure
Supportive measures
Enabling measures
Policy measures
Financial instruments
Legislative instruments
Policy package 0 - Status Quo
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 6
Supportive measures from EU
Voluntary and unfacilitated best practice exchange
MS decide whether to design and implement BRP
No regulation or formal guidance from EU level
Supportive measures from EU
Show how BRP can support LTRS (EPBD art. 2a) preparation
and objectives
Increase awareness through national/local communication
campaigns
Introduce training programmefor energy experts
Encourage MS to set up financial support schemes
linked to BRP
MS decide whether to design and implement BRP
No regulation or formal guidance from EU level
Policy package 1 (Soft)
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 7
Input(policy package)
Process(impact on BRPs)
Output(Impact categories)
MS decide whether to design and implement BRP
Dir
ect
mea
sure
Communication campaign
EU Encourage BRPs through LTRS
Sup
po
rtiv
e m
easu
re
Training of energy experts
Subsidies the cost for the development of the BRP
5 additional MS to implement BRPs
If o
mit
ted
→im
pac
t *
80
%
If o
mit
ted
→im
pac
t *
50
%
If o
mit
ted
→im
pac
t *
80
%
• Implemented as an optional add-on toEPCs
• 6% of people getting an EPC opts for theadditional BRP
∆ BRPs [#]
∆ Renovation rate [%] and depth [%]
• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%)
• Average energy saving between first andfinal step: 45%
• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 60%
Energy savings
CO2-emissions
Estimated improvement of EPC ratings
Triggered private investments
Health benefits
Increase in on-site renewables
Policy package 1
Public investment
Residential energy expenditure
ENER/C3/2018-447/05
8
Supportive measures from EU
Show how BRP can support LTRS (EPBD art. 2a) preparation
and objectives
Increase awareness through
national/local communication
campaigns
Introduce training programme for energy experts
Encourage MS to set up financial
support schemes linked to BRP
Develop guidelines on how banks can offer favourable interest rate for
loans/ mortgages
Make BRP mandatory for certain building segments after
2030
MS decide whether to design and implement BRP
No regulation or formal guidance from EU level
Policy package 2 (Stringent)
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 9
Input(policy package)
Process(impact on BRPs)
Output(Impact categories)
MS decide whether to design and implement BRP
Dir
ect
mea
sure
Communication campaign
EU Encourage BRPs through LTRS
Sup
po
rtiv
e m
easu
re
Training of energy experts
Subsidies the cost for the development of the BRP
9 additional MS to implement BRPs
• Implemented as an optional add-on toEPCs
• 7% of people getting an EPC opts for theadditional BRP
• BRP mandatory for buildings with EPClabel E-F-G after 2030 and D after 2040 inimplementing MS
∆ BRPs [#]
∆ Renovation rate [%] and depth [%]
• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%)
• Average energy saving between first andfinal step: 45%
• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 65%, 20%
Policy package 2
Develop guidelines on how banks can offer favourable interest rates rate
Make BRP mandatory for certain building segments after 2030
Energy savings
CO2-emissions
Estimated improvement of EPC ratings
Triggered private investments
Health benefits
Increase in on-site renewables
Public investment for different policy packages
Residential energy expenditure
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 10
Policy package 3 (Soft)
Supportive measures for the EU
Show how BRP can support LTRS (EPBD art. 2a) preparation
and objectives
Increase awareness through
national/local communication
campaigns
Introduce training programme for energy experts
Set up a forum of best practices
exchange
Guidelines on how BRP can be
integrated with EPC and combined with
a logbook
Support regional energy advice
centres
Introduce a common European reference framework for the BRP
Guidance on how MS can introduce the BRP
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 11
Input(policy package)
Process(impact on BRPs)
Output(Impact categories)
Introduce a common reference framework
Dir
ect
mea
sure
Communication campaign
EU Encourage BRPs through LTRS
Sup
po
rtiv
e m
easu
re
Training of energy experts
7 additional MS to implement BRPs
• Implemented as an optional add-on toEPCs
• 8% of people getting an EPC opts for theadditional BRP
∆ BRPs [#]
∆ Renovation rate [%] and depth [%]
• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%,)
• Due to lack of F.3 the impact above willbe 50% lower
• Average energy saving between first andfinal step: 45%
• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 65%
Policy package 3
Support BRP through regional energy advice centres and one-stop shops
Forum for best practices exchange
Guidance documents
Energy savings
CO2-emissions
Estimated improvement of EPC ratings
Triggered private investments
Health benefits
Increase in on-site renewables
Public investment for different policy packages
Residential energy expenditure
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 12
Policy package 4 (Stringent)
Supportive measures for the EU
Show how BRP can support LTRS
(EPBD art. 2a) preparation and
objectives
Common EU framework for certification of
building experts carrying out BRPs
Increase awareness
through national/local
communication campaigns
Encourage MS to set up financial
support schemes linked to BRP
Introduce training programme for energy experts
Guidelines on how BRP can be integrated with
EPC and combined with a
logbook
Encourage MS to set up a bonus that is trigger when certain
steps of the BRP are accomplished
Introduce a common European reference framework for the BRP
Guidance how MS can introduce the BRP, incl. minimum requirements on what the instrument should comprise
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 13
Input(policy package)
Process(impact on BRPs)
Output(Impact categories)
Introduce a common reference framework
Dir
ect
mea
sure
Communication campaign
EU Encourage BRPs through LTRS
Sup
po
rtiv
e m
easu
re
Training of energy experts
11 additional MS to implement BRPs
• Implemented as an optional add-on toEPCs
• 10% of people getting an EPC opts for theadditional BRP
∆ BRPs [#]
∆ Renovation rate [%] and depth [%]
• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%)
• Average energy saving between first andfinal step: 45%
• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 75%
Policy package 4
Common EU framework for certification of building experts
Forum for best practices exchange
Guidance documents
Subsidies the cost for the development of the BRP
Bonus triggered when a certain % of stages in the BRP have been
implementedIncrease average depth
Energy savings
CO2-emissions
Estimated improvement of EPC ratings
Triggered private investments
Health benefits
Increase in on-site renewables
Public investment for different policy packages
Residential energy expenditure
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 14
Policy package 5 (Soft)
Supportive measures for the EU
Subsidies the cost for the
development of the BRP
Increase awareness
through national/local
communication campaigns
Introduce training
programme for energy experts
Guidelines on how banks can
offer a favourable
interest rate for loans/ mortgages
Encourage MS to introduce progressive funding for packages of measures
recommended by the BRP
Encourage MS to set up a
bonus that is trigger when certain steps
of the BRP are accomplished
Set up a forum of best
practices exchange of BRP design
and implementatio
n
Guidelines on how BRP can be integrated with EPC and
combined with a digital
logbook
Incorporate BRPs as a requirement under the EPBD
Expand Article 11 of the EPBD to incorporate BRPs
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 15
Input(policy package)
Process(impact on BRPs)
Output(Impact categories)
Incorporate BRPs as a requirement under the EPBD
Dir
ect
mea
sure
Communication campaign
Sup
po
rtiv
e m
easu
re
Training of energy experts
All MS to implement BRPs
• Implemented as an optional add-on toEPCs
• 10% of people getting an EPC opts for theadditional BRP
∆ BRPs [#]
∆ Renovation rate [%] and depth [%]
• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%)
• Average energy saving between first andfinal step: 45%
• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 80%
Policy package 5
Forum for best practices exchange
Guidance documents
Subsidies the cost for the development of the BRP
Bonus triggered when a certain % of stages in the BRP have been
implemented
Lower interest rate on loans taken for measures linked to a BRP/ Progressive subsidies for measures linked to BRP
Energy savings
CO2-emissions
Estimated improvement of EPC ratings
Triggered private investments
Health benefits
Increase in on-site renewables
Public investment for different policy packages
Residential energy expenditure
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 16
Policy package 6 (Stringent)
Supportive measures for the EU
Increase awareness through
national/local communication
campaigns
Introduce training programme for energy experts
Introduce minimum energy efficiency
standard for buildings
BRP mandatory for every building sold
after 2030
BRP mandatory for all buildings with
EPC below class D by 2030
Buildings with EPC below class D can
only be sold if step 1-2 of renovation
roadmap implemented by
2035
Incorporate BRPs as a requirement under the EPBD
Expand Article 11 of the EPBD to incorporate BRPs
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 17
Input(policy package)
Process(impact on BRPs)
Output(Impact categories)
Incorporate BRPs as a requirement under the EPBD
Dir
ect
mea
sure
Communication campaign
Sup
po
rtiv
e m
easu
re
Training of energy experts
All MS to implement BRPs
• Implemented as an optional add-on toEPCs
• BRP mandatory for every building soldand lower EPC classes (assumed 80%compliance)
• 3% of people with EPC of higher labelsopts for the additional BRP
∆ BRPs [#]
∆ Renovation rate [%] and depth [%]
• Every BRP triggers renovation dependingon EPC rating (EPC E-F-G =90%, D=70%,C=32%, B=30%)
• Average energy saving between first andfinal step: 45%
• Share that completes all steps of theBRP: 20%
Policy package 6
Introduce minimum energy efficiency standard for renovation
Make the BRP mandatory for all buildings with EPC from class E from
2030 and from class D from 2040
BRP mandatory for every building sold after 2030 with EPC from class C
Buildings with EPC below class D can only be sold if step 1-2 of renovation roadmap implemented by 2030 and
below C from 2040
Energy savings
CO2-emissions
Estimated improvement of EPC ratings
Triggered private investments
Health benefits
Increase in on-site renewables
Public investment for different policy packages
Residential energy expenditure
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 18
Bu
ildin
g R
eno
vati
on
Pas
spo
rt
Deep dive: impact of BRP on renovation/energy savings
New renovations triggered
Increased renovation quality/depth
Savings that happen earlier than planned
20% of renovations have been triggered by the BRP
Energy saving per renovation case is estimated to be 11 – 25 percentage
points higher over 15 years
80% of the renovations that have already been planned (not triggered by BRP) is estimated to occur 1 year
earlier thanks to the instrument
Tota
l en
ergy
sav
ings
ENER/C3/2018-447/05 19
Thank you…
www.bpie.eu
@BPIE_eu
Jonathan Volt
BPIE
This study is a service contract with the European Commission’s Directorate General for Energy and has received funding under contract ENER/C3/2018-447/05.
The information and views set out in these slides are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission's behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of
the information contained therein.
These slides have been prepared by the authors to the best of their knowledge and ability. The authors do not assume liability for any damage that may arise for the use of the report or the information contained herein.
ENER/C3/2018-447/05