34
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003

FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

FDA Case Studies

Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee

March 4, 2003

Case 1

Dosing and Proof of Concept Submitted

Pediatric and Adult Disease are the Same

Case 1

• Types of studies: Two Phase I dose-finding studies in children with hematologic malignancies– from supplemental (S) NDA and from

original (O) NDA

• Size of data set: – for efficacy/safety: 39 [31(S) + 8(O) ]– for PK: 33 [27(S) + 6 (O) ]

Type of Information Submitted

• Safety

• PK

• PK-PD

• Proof of concept

Case 1

Results• Safety: similar to adults; MTD not reached• PK: parameters similar to adult values• PK-PD relationship: no correlation• Proof of concept

– remissions induced in the same malignancy in pediatrics as in adults, although in a limited number of pediatric patients

– remissions occurred in approximately the same proportion as in adults

Case 1

Comparison between Children & Adults

• Same side effects as adults but lower grade• Lack of PK-PD relationship

– exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) and Day 28 white blood cell count

• Lack of clear dose-proportionality– starting dose chosen to provide similar exposure

to adult doses – lack of relationship between dose and exposure

• overlap between AUCs for different doses

Case 1

Case 1. Overlap of Dose and Area under the Curve

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

Ped Dose 1 Ped Dose 2 Adult Dose

Dose

AU

CCase 1

Issues & Conclusions

• Efficacy and extrapolation– first time extrapolation has been used for

approval

• Challenge in finding a pediatric dosage

Case 1

Case 2

Dosing Submitted

Pediatric and Adult Disease are the Same

Case 2

• Type of study: Single Phase II pharmacokinetic study in malignant and non-malignant life-threatening conditions

• Size of data set: – 24 patients– ages 5 months to 16 years

Type of Information Submitted

• Safety– Clinical Adverse Events and laboratory

abnormalities

• PK/PD– Multiple sampling in each patient with initial

dosing based on body weight and subsequent adjustment based on PK/PD information

Case 2

Results

• Safety: generally similar to adults

• PK/PD: Suggested pediatric dosing based on population PK– Two-step dosing based on body weight– < 12 kg and > 12 kg

Case 2

Comparison between Children & Adults

• Pediatric data indicate need for higher dosage in smaller children (by weight)

Case 2

Issues & Conclusions

• Limited safety information and dosing recommendations added to Special Populations - Pediatric section

Case 2

Case 3

Dosing and Proof of Concept Submitted

Preliminary Activity in a Disease found only in Pediatric Patients with the

Approved Indications for Diseases found only in Adults

Case 3

• Types of studies: – Phase I dose-finding study in children with

solid tumors and hematologic malignancies– Phase II open label single arm study for

response rate in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors

• Size of data set: – Phase I: 48 (30 solid tumor + 18 leukemia),

ages 1-15 years– Phase II: 108, ages <1 to 15 years

Type of Information Submitted

• Safety

• PK

• PK-PD

• Proof of concept

Case 3

Results• Safety: similar to adults; MTD not reached for

leukemia, MTD for solid tumors higher than approved adult dose

• PK: parameters similar to adult values• PK-PD relationship: no relationship between

exposure and nadir white blood cell count due to maximal suppression at lowest dose

• Proof of concept – Consistent tumor responses seen in one class of

solid tumors

Case 3

Comparison between Children & Adults

• Higher doses tolerated in children

• Responses seen in some pediatric malignancies that are not found in adults

Case 3

Issues & Conclusions• The disease where activity was demonstrated in

children is a pediatric disease that is rarely found in adults

• The approved indications are diseases found almost exclusively in adults

• Extrapolation of efficacy cannot be used• Product labeling did not include the submitted

pediatric data• Product currently not approved for use in children

Case 3

Case 4

Dosing and Response Submitted

Lack of Activity

Case 4• Types of studies: Phase I dose-finding trial

in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies

• Size of data set:– Solid tumors: 25 evaluable patients– Hematologic malignancies: 4 evaluable patients– Additional 17 patients treated; inevaluable– Ages 2-17

Case 4• Types of studies: Phase II stratified open-

label study in solid tumors– Primary endpoint: Response rate

• Size of data set:– Designed to enroll at least 14 patients per subset

– CNS tumors 21 patients

– Soft tissue sarcoma 21 patients

– Neuroblastoma 4 patients

– Age < 21 (2 older ineligible pts excluded)

Type of Information Submitted

• Safety– Collected only AEs attributed to drug by PI– Post-marketing pediatric safety reports

• PK/PD– Abbreviated study reports (no primary

data)

• Efficacy– Abbreviated clinical trial study reports

Case 4

Results

• Safety: similar to adults• PK: MTD, recommended Phase II dose

identified• PK/PD: Recommended Phase II dose too

toxic; dose lowered• Efficacy

– RR 0 in CNS, neuroblastoma strata– Neuroblastoma arm closed early– 1 CR and 1 PR in soft tissue sarcoma

Case 4

Comparison between Children & Adults

• Toxicity profile similar in adults and children

• Recommended dose (after testing in Phase II) similar to that approved in adults

Case 4

Issues & Conclusions

• Brief description of study included in the label

• Negative efficacy data included in the label

• No PK or dosing data included

Case 4

Case 5

Dosing and Efficacy Submitted

Spectrum of Diseases Including Approved Adult Indication

Case 5• Types of studies:

– two Phase I studies included pharmacokinetics and dose determination data on patients with relapsed or refractory CNS & solid tumors

– one single-arm Phase II study to evaluate efficacy in relapsed or refractory CNS & solid tumors

• Size of data set:– Phase I studies: 82 patients, ages 3 to 17; 19

patients had pharmacokinetic data

– Phase II study: 122 patients, ages 3 to 17

Type of Information Submitted

• Safety

• PK/PD– multiple sampling in each patient with

initial dosing based on body surface area

• Efficacy

Case 5

Results

• Safety: similar to adults

• PK/PD– the pharmacokinetics of the drug are similar

independent of previous treatment– no relationship between age and clearance

• Efficacy: Of 122 patients, 1 CR and 5 PR

Case 5

Comparison between Children & Adults

• Similar clearance and volume of distribution values

• Response to therapy is different (worse in children)

• Responses occurred in a different histological subtype from the adult tumor

Case 5

Issues & Conclusions

• This drug was approved for an adult disease that also exists in children, BUT did not show efficacy in that disease

• Responses were seen in a disease that occurs primarily in children and for which there is available effective therapy

• What information, if any, should be included in the labeling?

Case 5

Case SummariesTypes ofStudies

InformationSubmitted

Results Comparison Issues

Case 1

Samediseaseadults &children

Phase I x 2

Total pts.-39

Safety, PK,PK/PD, Proofof Concept

Safety,dosing, andresponse torx same asadults

Drug bettertolerated inchildren, nodoseproportionality

Extrapolationused tosupportefficacy,Properpediatric dosestillindeterminate

Case 2

Samediseaseadults &children plusadditionalpediatricdiseases

Phase II

Total pts-24

SafetyPK/PD

Dosingdependentupon bodyweight withchange at 12kg

Higherpediatric dosein smallerchildren

Limited safetyand dosinginformationincluded inPediatricsSubsection ofPrecautions

Case 3

Different adultand pediatricdiseases

Phase I x 2Phase II

Total pts- 156

Safety, PK,PK/PD, Proofof Concept

Safety similarto adults,dosing higherin children, nodoseproportionality,Evidence ofactivity in apediatricdisease

Higher dosestolerated inchildren,

Extrapolationnotapplicable,Noinformation inpackageinsert

Case 4

Different adultand pediatricdiseases

Phase IPhase II

Total pts-71

Safety,PK/PD,Efficacy

Safety anddosing similarto adults, lowactivity

Safety anddosing similarto adults

Lack ofactivitydescribed inpackageinsert, nodosingprovided

Case 5

Spectrum ofpediatricdiseasesincludingapprovedadultindication

Phase I x 2Phase II

Total pts-204

Safety,PK/PD,Efficacy

Safety anddosing similarto adults, noresponses inchildren withdiseaseapproved inadults, activityin a pediatricdisease

Safety anddosing similarto adults, noactivity inapprovedindication foradults

Extrapolationnot possible