17
AD 678 726 FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH IN THREE 180-KSI YIELD STRENGTH STEELS IN AIR AND IN SALT-WATER ENVIRONMENTS T. W. Crooker, et al Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D. C. 26 September 1968

fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

  • Upload
    letuyen

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

AD 678 726

FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH IN THREE 180-KSI YIELD STRENGTHSTEELS IN AIR AND IN SALT-WATER ENVIRONMENTS

T. W. Crooker, et al

Naval Research LaboratoryWashington, D. C.

26 September 1968

Page 2: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

CONTENTS

Abstract iiProblem Status iiAuthorization ii

INTRODUCTION I

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS 1

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6

Crack Growth Rate Analysis 6Stress Level - Flaw Size Relationships for Fatigue 9

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 11

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 12

REFERENCES 12

Page 3: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

ABSTRACT

Fatigue crack propagation studies were conducted on threehigh-strength structdral steels: 9Ni-4Co-0.25C, 12Ni maraging,and 18Ni maraging. Each of the steels was heat treated to a yieldstrength of 180 ksi. Tests were performed in two environments,a 'dry' environment consisting of ambient room air and a "wet'environment consisting of 3.5-percent-NaCl salt water.

Relationships for fatigue crack growth rates as a function ofthe fracture mechanics, stress-intensity factor (K) are developedfor each steel, in both environments. The engineering significanceof these relationships are then presented in terms of stress levelsand flaw sizes relevant to the steels under investigation.

Significant differences were found among the fatigue crackpropagation characteristics of the three steels. Response to the"wet' environment varied, depending on the material and the stress-intensity level. The lower tough n e ss steel was less affected byenvironment, and environmental effects in all the steels diminishedwith increasing stress-intensity levels. No correlation was ob-served between fatigue crack propagation be hav i or in the 'wet'environment and the stress-corrosion cracking parameter (K ic)obtained on the same materials.

PROBLEM STATUS

This is an interim report on the problem; work is continuing.

AUTHORIZATION

NRL Problems M01-18, M03-01, and FVI-17Projects RR 007-01-46-5420SF 020-01-OlB-12383, and

S-4607-11894

Manuscript submitted June 21, 1968.

Page 4: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH IN THREE 180-KST YIELD STRENGTHSTEELS IN AIR AND SALT WATER ENVIRONMENTS

INTRODUCTION

A basic requirement for the fracture-safe application of high-strength struc-tural alloys is the subcritical containment of flaws. Fracture toughness determinesthe critical flaw size for a given working stress level, and crack growth resistanceto fatigue and stress-corrosion determines how rapidly a flaw of critical size candevelop in service.

This report discusses fatigue crack growth in three structural steels: 9NI-4Co-0.25C, 12Ni maraging, and 18Ni maraging. Fatigue crack growth characteristics fora 'dry" environment of ambient room air and a Owet' environment of 3.5-percent-NaCI salt water are presented as a function of the fracture mechanics stress-intensity factor (K). Using K as the common analytical parameter, the fatigueresults are considered in relation to the fracture toughness (K,,) and stress-corrosion cracking (K ,,,) characteristics of the steels under investigation. In addi-tion, the structural analysis is reduced to more practical terms by use of stresslevel and flaw size relationships.

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS

Broad spectrum characterization studies conducted at NRL have shown that forstructural steels, the 180/200 ksi yield strength (ys) range is a significant transitionregion for both fracture and fatigue properties. In this region, fracture toughnessdecreases sharply and fatigue crack growth rates increase sharply. Figure 1 (1)shows fracture toughness characteristics of 1-in.-plate materials as a function ofyield strength. This diagram indicates the normal expectancy for fracture toughnessin conventionally processed steels and the optimum levels of fracture toughness thatcan be attained in specially processed steels. A practical engineering index offracture toughness ic obtained by computing the K,,'0y, ratio, which normalizesfracture toughness with respect to yield strength. The locus of the unity value ofthis ratio is indicated in Fig. 1. For 1-in.-plate materials this unity ratio linerepresents the transition between materials which possess sufficient toughness tofracture in plane stress (K 1.o) and those materials whose fracture toughnessis sufficiently low to fracture fn plane strain (K1 oy, i. o). It can be seen fromFig. 1 that this unity ratio line intersects the optimum materials trend line (OMTL)curve near 200 ksi and the normal OMTL expectancy curve at 180 ksi. Thus thecritical aspects of this ys region become more apparent. Pellini (1) has noted thecritical features of fracture toughness characteristics at the 180-ksi level, and hehas also noted the wide range of fracture toughness values measured in varioussteels at this strength level.

Fatigue crack propagation studies of structural steels performed by the nuthorsAe summariztl in Fig. 2. This diagram was prepared from the results of charac-terization studies employing surface-cracked plate bend specimens under strain-controlled cycling (2). Figure 2 shows trends in the rate at which fatigue cracksgrow as a function of yield strength under two loading intensities, ys stress (-',)and half ys stress (a,, 2 ) and in two environments, ambient room air and 3.5-percent-NaCI salt water. Figure 2 also shows that under optimum service conditions, i.e.,

1----------

Page 5: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

2 CROOKER AND LANGE

'0s00* C

9~ 0- -

go IItC- - 6

60 SO 00 20 4-0 -40G/ U

o4 tm0 maera trend line 9-OM5 TL

400 -0 Gal A00 120000 0

9'- I

so0 to 12 s/- 20 20 20(1~c~n 14 W 1K IA'

8 e sa a* functionf of yiel stegh()idctn h*pimr matria trn lin (OMT

YIEL STE/H I/400 Go SO 100 10440 60

ISTEELSx

EELS

700-

7

- - -, (SALT WATER)

I - - 210 3

a. 60 S 0 2 0 60 200 220 240 2600"E6LD %TRENGTO WSO1

i g. Fatig4'a c r-a(.k xros~th r-ate chara, teristiL 9 of4t I ttiral st -1 ds a f,,,iction of yield strength (2)

Page 6: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

Moor

NRL REPORT 6761

small flaws, cyclic stresses below ,' 2, and a "dry' environment, fatigue crackgrowth occurs slowly in all steels. Under these conditions, fatigue failures areunlikely except in cases where a flaw of substantial size has gone undetected orin materials of very low fracture toughness where critical flaw sizes may be verysmall. However, once a departure has been made from these optimum conditions,fatigue cracks tend to grow much more rapidly, especially in higher strength steels.

Surveying the spectrum of data, it can be seen that the 180/200-ksi ys rangeis critical for fatigue as well as for fracture. An exceedingly broad range offatigue performance can be noted in this region. Fatigue crack growth rates canvary over more than two orders of magnitude, depending on the material, loadintensity, and environment. Also, it can be noted that the ys region above 180/200ksi is characterized by trends toward very rapid fatigue crack growth.

A detailed description of the materials under investigation is summarized inTables I through 4. A broad range of studies have been performed on these materialsby various NRL investigators, and tle results have been brought together to serveas background information. Identificadion of the parent plate is provided by theNRL code number. Minor variations in strength and toughness properties occuramong samples taken from a given plate, depending on fracture orientation andheat treatnent. The ASTM fracture identification procedure (3) is employed, asillustrated in Fig. 3. Tensile and impact properties given in Table 3 refer to thespecific strength level and orientation of the fatigue specimens. However, the frac-ture mechanics data given in Table 4 refers, in some cases, to other orientationsand strength levels as identified.

Table 1Chemical Compositions

r; -o ateril_ C0. ]ooElement (wt t " To

lNi~igi, 0.oo, o.o010.oo50.1o. 71,.8 5.12 3.30i - - 0o.24 0.11

Table 2Description of Processing

Matearial NRL RollingmCdde Procedure Het Tratmt__

9Ni-4Co-0.25C .J15 i Highly Mill: Normalized at 1600F. 1 Hour.

Cross-Rolled Austenttzed at l50*F. 1 Hour. Oilto 1-in. Thick Quenr-hed, Temj~ered at l000° F., AirPlate Cooled

12Ni Maraging J7 Highly Mill: Solution Annealed at 1500 F

Cross-Rolled to NRL: Aged 20 Hours at 900 F.. Air1-in. Thick Plate Cooled

I8Ni Maraging K5 5 Highly Mill: Solution Annealed a 650. F.:Cross-Rolled to NRL: Aged 3 Hours at 900F.. Airl-in. Thick Plate Cooled

12NiMargingJ7 ighl Mil: Sluton Aneaed a 150'FCros-Roled o NL: Aed 0 Hors t 90'F. Ai

Page 7: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

4 CROOKER AND LANGL

rTable 3

Tensile and Impact Properties

0.505-in.-Dia. Tension Test Data 1 Impact Data

Code Orientation 0.2% y# UTS Elong. R.A. C, at 30-F 1-in. Dynamic(ksi) (kai) (%) (%) (ft-lb) Tear at 30* F (ft-lb)

9Ni-4Co-0.25C JIS WR 183.2 195.0 17.0 61.0 40 1966

1211i Maraging J7 WE 181.5 188.5 14.5 62.3 66 3843

18Ni Maraging K15 RW 179.9 191.4 14.0 62.2 47 4160

Table 4Fracture Mechanics Data

Fracture Toughness Stress-Corrosion CrackingMaterial N RL 8 eCode %. Fracture ICorrected NRL Fracture K j NRL(Msi) Orientation NeiKi.) Investigator (kui) Orientation (ksi VY.) nvestigator

9Ni-4Co-0.25C J15 183 RW 155 C.N. Freed 183 RW 100 G. Sandoz183 WR 153 C.N. Freed183 wT 159 H.L. Smith

12Ni Maraging J7 176 WR 249 H.L. Smith 181 WT 70 G. Sandoz176 WT 246 H.L. Smith 181 RI" 80 G. Sandoz

8Ni Maraging K15 197 RW" 231 H.L. Smith 197 RW 104 G. Sandoz205 W 1 194 H.L. Smith

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Fatigue crack propagation tests were performed using single-edge-notched (SEN)specimens cycled zero-to-tension in cantilever bending. A detail drawing of thefatigue specimen is shown in Fig. 4. The test section has nominal dimensions of2.5 in. wide and 0.5 in. thick. The net thickness is reduced to 0.45 in. by side-grooving,which acts to suppress shear lip formation and promote a straight crack front. Theedge-notch is nominally 0.5 in. deep, and fatigue crack propagation is allowed toextend the flaw to a maximum total depth of 1.5 in. Measurements of fatigue cracklength are performed by a slide-mounted optical micrometer focused on the rootsurface of one side-groove.

Special techniques aid optical observation of the fatigue crack tip. Tool marksare obliterated from the side-groove surface by applying a light sandblast, whichcauses reflected light to be diffused, thus eliminating glare. During fatigue testing,an intense light is focused on the area of the crack tip, and a dark red opticalfilter is placed in front of the 32-mm-focal-length objective lens of the opticalmicrometer. These procedures produce a sharp, clear view of the fatigue cracktip. For a test specimen as shown in Fig. 4, the combination of test section thick-ness and side-groove results in a straight crack front, thereby allowing accuratemeasurements from surface observations.

* 4

Page 8: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

NRL REPORT 67615

R -ROLLING DIRECTION

151 LETTER - NORMAL TO THEFRACTURE PLANE

2nd LETTER - DIRECTION OFPROPAGATION IN FRACTURE PLANJE

Fig. 3 -ASTM identification procedure forfractores in rolled plate (3)

UNBROKEN LIGAMENT 0.45"

SIDE -GROOVES 0.025" DEEP x 4W

16.50"--S00" NOTCHI

0.062" WIDE x 0.50" DEEP

2.50"

17.2 5

Fig. 4 -NRL single -edge- notched (SEN) cantileverfatigue specimen with side-groov.es

Page 9: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

6 CROOKER AND LANGE

N', " ,C f AC TEFsIC', OF NRL 4'7O

4t r X4 NY, . / 160

/ '160

/ .40

30

r " o Fig. 5 - Stress-intensity (K) characteristics of0 the SEN fatigue specimen as a function of flaw

/ , size (a) for various constant loads. The curves

were calculated from Kies' equation (4).

<40

302, .20

"0

05 O 07 08 09 ,o 12 1 3 14 1'5

FLAW 0IZo,,

The fatigue crack propagation tests were run under constant load, zero-to-tensionat a frequency of 5 cpm. As the crack propagates through the test section, the stress-iitensity factor range (\K) increases, producing a range of crack growth rates for study.The stress-intensity characteristics of the fatigue specimen are illustrated in Fig. 5,where the relationship between stress-intensity factor (K) and flaw size (a) is shown forseveral load values. Flaw size is defined as total crack depth measured from the speci-men edge and includes the nominal 0.5-in. notch. The stress-intensity curves in Fig. 5were computed from the equation of Kies (4).

The "wet" environment studies were performed by placing a polyurethane cell aroundthe test section. Distilled water containing 3.5-percent NaC1 was continuously pumpedthrough the cell from a reservoir. The salt water was filtered and aerated on a continu-ous flow basis. The cell contained a plexiglas window for crack observation. Periodiccleaning of the side-groove surface was required to remove corrosion deposits.

Specimens were cycled until a maximum flaw size of 1.5 in. was grown or untilfailure occurred. Failure is defined as brittle fracture or gross yielding. Continuousmeasurements of moment arm deflection displayed on a strip recorder indicated the,nset of gross yielding.

3iFSULTS AND DISCUSSION

CracK Growth Rate Analysis

A track growth rate analysis provides the most general comparative basis for'naracutrizing the fatigue behavior of materials. In addition, a crack growth rateanalvsis servs as a transitional function between laboratory specimen data and crack-rowth in structurt.s. An empirical correlation between the fatigue crack growth rateIda dN) and 1he fracture mechanics, stress-intensity factor range ( \K) was originally

rolxtsed by Parts (5). and it has now been adopted by many investigators in the field.h ef benefit f this approach is that both parameters employed in the correlation

Page 10: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

NRL REPORT 6761 7

are not restr cted to the specific test conditions and may be interpreted for a widevariety structures provided the necessary conditions for a fracture mechanics analysisprevail. Basically, these conditions are an accurate knowledge of flaw size and shape,an accurate stress analysis, and assurance that gross yielding has not occurred.

Growth rate data for the three steels under investigation are shown in Figs. 6through 8, and summarized in Figs. 9 and 10. These figures are log-log plots of da/dNversus \K. The open symbols denote data from tests conducted in the 'dry," room airenvironment, and the closed symbols denote data from the 'wet,' 3.5-percent NaClsalt water environment. The threshold stress-intensity level, above which stress-corrosion cracking (K I, ..) can occur, is indicated on these figures for each steel. Thesignificance of the Kl,,, parameter, developed by Brown, is discussed in Ref. 6.

The following observations pertain to the fatigue crack growth rate data presentedin Figs. 6 through 8. The growth rate data for all three steels in air follow power-lawrelationships of the form da/dN = C(%K)'. The value of the exponent m is 2.3 for the twomaraging steels and 4.0 for the 9Ni-4Co-0.25C steel. Although the mathematical formof the relationships is the same for each steel, significant differences are apparent

among the three curves. These data do not conform to a common crack propagation law,except perhaps in very broad terms; and the crack propagation characteristics of 180-ksiys steels must be considered on an individual basis.

STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR RANGE, -K (MN n -)

2000 20 50 1i0 200

9Ni-4Co-025C STEEL I

cr., =8 0

KS1 (1240MN/m

2 )

1000 ZERO-TO-TENSION

CONSTANT LOAD CYCLE

500 CM-o AIR, 500 LBS I

-~OAIR, 1500 LBS Io.S .SALT WATER, 1500 LBS "

ZOO

50 0

0

1O 20 50 4 O0 200

STRESS -INTENSIT Y FACTOR RANGE, ,LK! (KSI , N)

Fig. 6 - Log-log plot of fatigte crackgrowth rate (da/dN) versus stress-

intensity factor range(, (K) for 9Ni-4Co-0,zIC steel. The open symbols denote

air eT"mil'ontnent data and the closed syni-bolsd not oalt aterenvironmerit data.

Th,' K ., stress-intensity I t. e I of l1)oksi' in. is indicated by the dashed line.

Page 11: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

8 CROOKER AND LANGE

STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR RANGE. A~k (MN m- )STRESS-INTENSITy FACTOR RANGE, 6K (MN ")

20 1 s o 0 20 2000 20 50 100 200

12 Ns MARAGING STEELI IS Ni MARAGING STEEL Iay IOKSI(1240MN/ n2 1

a y z180KS (24OMN/rn2)

ZERO-TO-TENSION 1000 ZERO-TO-TENSIONi000 CNSTANTLOAD

YCLE I G

CONSTANT LOAD CONSTANT LOAD CYCLE

5 CPM 5 CPM .10, AIR. 1000 LOS 500 -AIR5o 0 -A I. 2 000OS . SALT . O--

,

• /. WATE R 7- -( 2, E,

- * ,OS 0 SALT WATER, 10 LS "2 SALT WATER, 50 LBSL z

200

0 2I0

0IS00

Fi. 7 o -o plo of faiu crac Fi.8 -L glg poto aiu rc

:

SALT A 10 4kiT01

L

If SALT WATER, 200 LBS -

2 0 I ' 2 0 -,

The fi c o t r o rhse in sl wt a ao 2n e n

Fig. 7 - Log-log plot of fatigue crack Fig. 8 - Log-log plot of fatigue crackgrowth rate (da/dN) ver vus stress- growth rate (da/dN) versus stress-intensity factor range(AK) for mNi intensity factor range( ssK) forl8Niuearagins steel. The K1 , level is maraging steel. The K, t level is7 5 k s i i n .

0 4 k s i -n .

The fatigue crack growth rate data for the steels in salt water are also included inFigs. 6 through 8 and are summarized in Fig. 10. It is common knowledge that thepresence of a Salt water environment can accelerate fatigue crack growth The purposeof this study was to determine the magnitude of these accelerations and to assess theusefulness of the static K Icparameter for predicting the salt water, fatigue crackgrowth behavior..

The response of the three steels the wdr he 5 cpm loading rate varied,depending on the alloy and the stress -intensity. In each case, however, the greatest

acceleration in growth rates occurred at low K levels, below 40 ksi Tn., which was

less than half the K,, value. Also, in each case the acceleration in growth rates

decreased as the \K level increased. In all cases the "wet" environment growth rate

curves tended toward convergence with the mdry environment growth rate curves at

higher \K levels. The maximum environmental effects on growth rates were less thanan order of magnitude in all cases. Among the three steels under investigation, 9Ni-4Co-0.25C exhibited the least response to the salt water environment.

There was no apparent correlation between these data and the K1,,. parameter.This is attributed to the fact that stress-corrosion cracking occurs very slowly in thesesteels. Fatigue loading at 5 cpm does not allow sufficient time for this crack propagationmechanism to exert a strong influence on crack growth rates. In contrast, where stress-corrosion cracks propagate much more rapidly in titanium alloys than in steels, several

Page 12: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

NRL REPORT 6761 9

STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR RANGE, AK (MN AC )2 0 5 0 00 2 0 0 S T R ES S - IN T E N S IT Y F A C T O R R A N G E . L KI ( M N )

2000 20 50 100 200

HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS 2020 .. 0.. I

as=180 KSI (1240MN/m2) HIGH-STRENGTH STEELSoe ysI8OKSI (240MN/m

2)

ROOM AIR ENVIRONMENT ay -KSI(2MN/)1I0O0_ SALT WATER ENVIRONMENT

SooX -

5000,//0-2E 2 /E

7 zLz

-

200 / 2z

V O 200

a i.9-Sm a yo i niom n i.I Su ma y .

al-w te evio-

1- 4

U0 U

S50- 5010

- -10- WD D

tt

20 / 20-

1 0 20 50 100 200 60 20 50 1 00 200STRESS-INTENSITY FACTOR RANGE, tLK ICSI ./(N_) STRESS- INTENSITY FACTOR RANGE, LK 1,151 .AR

Fig. 9 - Summary of air environment Fig. 10 - Summary of salt-water environ-fatigue crack growth rate curves mnent fatigue crack growth rate curves

investigators (7,8) have proposed that Klscc can serve as an index of salt-water fatiguebehavior by indicating the onset of rapid fatigue crack growth.

All samples of the 9Ni-4Co-0.25C steel under investigation, both in air and in saltwater, developed very rapid rates of fatigue crack growth at a AK level of approximately100 ksi v-. This happens to coincide with the value of the K 1,c parameter for thissteel, which would suggest that environmental cracking played a role in this rapid crackpropagation behavior. A separate study was made of this phenomenon using electronfractography, and no evidence was found to indicate that environmental cracking wassignificant (9). The microfracture modes in the fast growth rate regions consistedexclusively of shallow dimples. No cleavage or quasi-cleavage, usually associated withenvironmental cracking, was observed. Therefore, it was concluded that this behaviorwas related to fracture toughness rather than environmental cracking.

Stress Level-Flaw Size Relationships for Fatigue

Fatigue crack growth rate data, as a function of stress-intensity, can be restated interms of stress level and flaw s.ze relationships. The stress-intensity factor (K) is pro-portional to the product of stress (a) times the square root of flaw size (%7i); the exactexpression being dependent on the shape and the dimensions of the structure. Figures 11and 12 are linear plots of fatigue crack growth rate (da/dN) versus flaw depth (a). Theconditions under which these curves apply is an axial-loaded, surface-cracked platecontaining a semicircular flaw that has been studied extensively by Tiffany (10). Two

A

........

Page 13: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

10 CROOKER AND -ANGE

FLAW DEPTHj -"n

2000 I, _ 20

HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS 2c I,1800 rys : 180 KS

ROOM AIR ENVIRONMENT1600 0 -- '102

2C 5

01400/

1' I200 /.0

/oo ,b }

4 000- 800- 2,102

//.H400 1.02

200

0 010 020 030 040 05 060 OTO 080 090 00FLAW DEPTH. o IIN)

Fig. 11 - Linear plot i fatigue crack growth rate (da/dN)as a function of flaw depth (a) in air for the three 180-ksisteels. The curves are based on stress-intensity factorsfor an axial-loaded surface-cracked plate (10),and referto a semicircular flaw (a/Zc = 0.50 at two cyclic stresslevels, y, and y. 2.

groups of curves are shown in each figure; one group refers to cycli c stress levels of0to "', I \, Y.) , and the other group refers to cyclic stress levels 0 to yr%021 \ ,,.. 2).Figure 11 shows air environment curves and Fig. 12 shows salt water env ronmentcurves. The initiation of each curve corresponds to a \K level of 40 ksi \Ii. and thetermination corresponds to a \K level of 100 ksi fin.

The curves present a graphic illustration of the ability of these steels to containflaws sub-ritically, as measured in terms of cyclic stress levels and flaw sizes.Although these curves are not complete, in the sense that the fatigue crack growth is nottraced all the way to the critical stress-intensity (K,,), it can be seen that the flaw sizesfor steels at the 180-ksi ys level are relatively small. It can also be seen that signifi-cant differences exist among the fatigue characteristics of these steels. Although thesalt water environment curves are displaced to higher growth rates than the airenvironment curves, the relative order of the curves is not significantly changed. Viewedon the basis of these plots, 12Ni maraging steel clearly emerges as possessing the mostfavorable fatigue crack growth resistance of the three 180-ksi ys steels.

The results of this study should be viewed in relation to the following qualifications.With the exception of the 9Ni-4Co-0.25C steel, fatigue crack growth was not pursued allthe way to critical fracture conditions. To do so, within the framework of linear elasticfracture mechanics, larger test section sizes are required for the high toughness marag-ing steels studied. Therefore, the overall fatigue performance data must be consideredas incomplete for the maraging steels. In addition, the 'wet" onvironment data and their

Page 14: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

NRL REPORT 6761 11

FLAW DfPTH.0(

2000 'P '- -

s800 HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS 2 -a,, . 180 KSit ,

1600 SALT WATER ENVIRONMENT 050 4 12

1400 -

o1200 I 3.102

x 000A0 -, -0

00 040- Of AG-

J 0

FLAW EPTH,o (IN)

Fig. 12 - Linea, plot of fatigue crack growth rate (daldN)as a function of flaw depth (a) in salt water for the three180-ksi ys steels. The curves are based on stress-intensity factors for an axial -loaded surface -cracked plate(10), and refer to a semicircular flaw (a /2c = 0. 50) at twocyclic stress levels, y, and y, '2.

relationship to K,.. must be considered as potentially sensitive to loading frequencyand fracture orientation. These aspects warrant further study.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

iFatigue crack propagation studies were conducted on three 180-ksi ys steels;

9N-4Co-0.25C, 12Ni maraging, and 18Ni maraging. Tests using single -edge -notchedS(SEN) cantilever seinscycled zero-to-tension weeconducted in a &dry" environ-

ament of ambient room air and a dwet" environment of 3.5-percent NaC salt water.Results were analyzed in terms of the fracture mechanics , stress-Intensity factor (K).

# The following conclusions have been reached from this study:

~1. For three steels with the same 180-ksi ys level, significant differences were

observed among their fatigue crack growth rate characteristics, measured as a function ofthe stress-intensity factor fK).

2. Fatigue crack growth in all three steels was accelerated by the *wet* environ-ment, but only to a limited extent. The greatest accelerations were of less than an orderof magnitude and occurred under low stress- intensity ( \K = 40 ksiv 'n.). Convergenceoa the wet and dry growth-rate curves occurred at higher stress-ntensity

(\K 100 ksi (T-.).

3. No correlation was observed between wet" fatigue crack growth behavior inthese steels and the stress -corrosion cracking parameter (K ,,, ) obtained on the samematerials. This lack of correspondence between the two modes of subcrtical flaw growth

Page 15: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

12 CROOKER AND LANGE

is attributed to the fact that, although these steels are susceptible to stress-corrosioncracking, long periods of time under static load are required to propagate stress-corrosioncracks. Cyclic loading at 5 cpm does not provide sufficient time for stress-corrosioncracking to exert a strong influence on fatigue crack growth in these steels.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to acknowledge the work of Mr. R.J. Hicks who performed thefatigue tests. The authors are also grateful for the continued financial support of thiswork by the Office of Naval Research, the Naval Ship Systems Command, and the DeepSubmergence Systems Project.

REFERENCES

1. Pellini, W.S., "Advances in Fracture Toughness Characterization Procedures and inQuantitative Interpretations to Fracture-Safe Design for Structural Steels," NRLReport 6713, Apr. 3, 1968

2. Crooker, T.W., and Lange, E.A., 'Low Cycle Fatigue Crack Propagation Resistanceof Materials for Large Welded Structures,' p. 94 in "Fatigue Crack Propagation,"ASTM STP 415, 1967

3. Anonymous, 'The Slow Growth and Rapid Propagation of Cracks,* Mater. Res. Std.l(No. 5):389 (May 1961)

4. Kies, J.A., Smith, H.L., Romine, H.E., and Bernstein, H., 'Fracture Testing ofWeldments,' p. 328 in 'Fracture Toughness Testing and Its Applications,' ASTM STP381, 1965

5. Paris, P.C., 'The Fracture Mechanics Approach to Fatigue," p. 107 in "Fatigue - AnInterdisciplinary Approach, Proceedings Tenth Sagamore Army Materials ResearchConference,' Aug. 13-16, 1963; Syracuse Univ. 1964

6. Brown, B.F., 'A New Stress-Corrosion Cracking Test for High-Strength Alloys,'Mater. Res. Std. 6(No. 3):129 (Mar. 1966)

7. Piper, D.E., Smith, S.H., and Carter, R.V., 'Corrosion Fatigue and Stress-CorrosionCracking in Aqueous Environments,' Boeing Company Document D6-60067, Renton,Wash., Mar. 1967

8. Crooker, T.W., and Lange, E.A., 'Corrosion Crack Propagation in Tt-6A-4V UnderStatic and Cyclic Loading,' Report of NRL Progress, p. 25, Feb. 1968

9. Crooker, T.W., Cooley, L.A., Lange, E.A., and Freed, C.N., 'Subcritical Flaw Growthin 9Ni-4Co-0.25C Steel - A Fatigue and Fractographic Investigation and Its Relationshipto Plane Strain Fracture Toughness,' NRL Report 6698, May 1, 1968

10. Tiffany, C.F., and Masters, J.N., 'Applied Fracture Mechanics,' p. 249 in 'FractureToughness Testing and Its Applications,' ASTM STP 381, 1965

Page 16: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

Security CIassnflcation

DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R & DS.ctuy l.It.-tbon .1 titl. boady 0f b.traet and iMd.uitn snnolf -1d be *to ,.d trimn the. -I -~~l p-1 1. cTl... Hied)

I OR1 I S-AT ING ACT IVITYV (Corpo~at. auth..T) l2. REPORT SECUIRITY CLASSIFICATION

Naval Re search Laboratory UnclassifiedWashington, D.C., 20390 2h. GROUP

3 REPORT TITLE

FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH IN THREE 180-KSI YIELD STRENGTH STEELSIN AIR AND SALT WATER ENVIRONMENTS

4 DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (7-rpe otf.sert and intclusive dates)

An interim rertoa continuing problem.5 AU TNVOR14S (First e.. IdS Anitil, Matt n.ai)

T.W. Crooker and E.A. Lange

* REPORT DATE 10. TOT AL NO OP PAGES Tb6. No. OP RIEPS

September 26, 1968 16 10Ise. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO Its. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT %UMIV9tS1

NRL Problem M01-18, M03-01, and. RI[ No FOI-17 NRL Report 6761

RR 007-01-46- 5420, SF 020-01-OlE-'-12383, and S-4607-11894 11b. OTNER R EPORT NOISI1 (Any oChi neinSerSeea 6y belied

d.

IS. OISTRIOUTION STATEMENT

This document has been approved for public release and sale;its distribution is unlimited.

It. SUPPLEMEN91TARY NOTES 12. SPONSORINOWMLITARY ACTIVITV

Dept. of the Navy (Office of NavalRe search)Washington, D.C., 20360

15. ADSTRACT

Fatigue crack propagation studies were conducted on three high-strengthstructural steels; 9N-4Co-0.25C, 12Ni maraging, and iSNi maraging. Each ofthe steels was heat treated to a yield strength of 180 ksi. Tests were performedin two environments, a 'dry"R environment consisting of ambient room air and aewet0 environment consisting of 3.5-percent-NaCl salt water.

Relationships for fatigue crack growth rates as a function of the fracturemechanics, stress -intensity factor (K) are developed for each steel, in both environ-ments. The engineering significance of these relationships are then presented interms of stress levels and flaw sizes relevant to the steels under investigation.

Sign~ificant differences were found among the fatigue crack propagation charac-teristi( s of the three steels. Response to the 1"wet 5 k environment varied, dependingon the material and the stress -intensity level. The lower toughness steel was lessaffected by environment, and environmental effects in all the steels diminished withincreasing stre ss-intensity levels. No correlation was observed between fatiguecrack propagation behavior in the 'wet" environment and the stress-corrosioncracking parameter (KIScC) obtained on the same materials.

D D -'0*'e 14 73 (PAGE 1) 13 _______________

SS 0101-007-6901 secuarity classification

Page 17: fatigue crack growth in three 180-ksi yield strength steels in air and

UnclassifiedSecurity Classification

K RMSLINK A LINK * LINK C

ROLE WT ROLE WT ROLE WT

High-strength structural alloysSubcritical flawsFracture toughnessStress-corrosion crackinigFatigue crack growth rateDry environmentSalt -water environmentFracture mechanics,* stre ss- intensity factor180-ksi yield strength steelsCyclic loadingGrowth rate - flaw size diagram

DD .'~"V.1473 B3ACK)_________

(PAGE 21 14 Security Classification