Upload
olinga-herbert
View
13
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Investment analysis in farm management
Citation preview
Farm Management
Chapter 17Investment Analysis
farm management chapter 17
3
Time Value of Money
1. The dollar could be invested to earn interest2. If dollar is spent on consumption, we’d
prefer to get the enjoyment now3. Risk is also a factor as unforeseen
circumstances could prevent us from getting the dollar
4. Inflation may diminish the value of the dollar over time
A dollar today is preferred to a dollar in the future:
farm management chapter 17
4
Present Value and Future Value• Present Value (PV): the number of dollars
available or invested at the current time or the current value of some amount to be received in the future
• Future Value (FV): the amount to be received at some future time or the amount a present value will be worth at some future date when invested at a given interest rate
farm management chapter 17
5
More Terms• Payment (PMT): number of dollars to be paid
or received in a time period• Interest Rate ( i ): also called the discount
rate the interest rate used to find present and future values, often equal to opportunity cost of capital
• Time Periods ( n ): the number of time periods used to compute present and future values
• Annuity: a term used to describe a series of periodic payments
farm management chapter 17
6
Table 17-1 Future Value of $1,000
Value atbeginning of interest rate Interest earned Value at end
Year year (%) ($) of year ($)
1 1000.00 8 80.00 1080.002 1080.00 8 86.40 1166.403 1166.40 8 93.30 1259.70
farm management chapter 17
7
Figure 17-1Illustration of the concept of future value
for a present value and for an annuity
farm management chapter 17
8
Figure 17-2Relation between compounding
and discounting
farm management chapter 17
9
Computing Future Value
FV = PV ( 1 + i ) n
FV = $1,000 ( 1 + 0.08 ) 3
= $1,259.70
farm management chapter 17
10
Future Value of an Annuity
FV = PMT ( 1 + i ) n 1i
farm management chapter 17
11
Present Value
PV = FV
(1 + i ) nor FV
1
(1 + i ) n
farm management chapter 17
12
Present Value of an Annuity
PV = PMT 1 ( 1 + i ) -n i
farm management chapter 17
13
Figure 17-3Illustration of the concept of present value
for a future value and for an annuity
farm management chapter 17
14
Table 17-2 Value of an Annuity
Year Amount ($) Present Value Factor Present Value ($)
1 1,000.00 0.92593 925.932 1,000.00 0.85734 857.343 1,000.00 0.79383 793.83
Total 2,577.10
farm management chapter 17
15
Investment Analysis• Investment analysis, also called capital
budgeting, involves determining profitability of an investment
• Initial cost: actual total expenditure for the investment
• Net cash revenues: cash receipts minus cash expenses
• Terminal value: usually the same as salvage value
• Discount rate: opportunity cost of capital
farm management chapter 17
16
Payback PeriodThe payback period is the number ofyears it would take an investment toreturn its original cost. If net cash revenues are constant each year, thepayback period (P) is:
P =
C
Ewhere C is original costand E is the expected annual net cash revenue
farm management chapter 17
17
Table 17-3 Revenues for Two $10,000 Investments
Year Investment A Investment B
1 3,000 1,0002 3,000 2,0003 3,000 3,0004 3,000 4,0005 3,000 6,000
Total cash revenues 15,000 16,000Less initial investment -10,000 -10,000Net Cash Revenues 5,000 6,000
Average net revenue/yr 1,000 1,200
Net revenues ($)
no terminal value
farm management chapter 17
18
Finding Payback Period
The payback period for investment Ais 3.33 years ($10,000 ÷ 3)
The payback for investment B is 4 years, which is found by summingthe revenues until they reach $10,000.
farm management chapter 17
19
Limitations of the Payback Period
The payback period is easy to calculate and identifies the investments with the most immediate cash returns. But it ignoresreturns after the end of the payback periodas well as the timing of cash flows.
farm management chapter 17
20
Simple Rate of Return
Rate of return =
Investment A =
Investment B =
average annual net revenueinitial cost
$1,000$10,000
x 100% = 10%
$1,200$10,000
x 100% = 12%
farm management chapter 17
21
Net Present Value
Net Present Value (NPV) is the sumof the present values of each year’snet cash flow minus the initial investment.
NPV = + + + CP1 P2 Pn
(1 + i )1 (1 + i )2 (1 + i )n . .
farm management chapter 17
22
Table 17-4 Net Present Value
Net cash Present Present Net cash Present PresentYear flow ($) value factor value ($) flow ($) value factor value ($)
1 3,000 0.9090 2,727 1,000 0.9090 909 2 3,000 0.8260 2,478 2,000 0.8260 1,652 3 3,000 0.7510 2,253 3,000 0.7510 2,253 4 3,000 0.6830 2,049 4,000 0.6830 2,7325 3,000 0.6210 1,863 6,000 0.6210 3,726
11,370 11,27210,000 10,0001,370 1,27215.2% 13.8%
Investment B
Total
Investment A
TotalLess initial cost
Net present valueNet present valueInternal rate of returnInternal rate of return
Less initial cost
10% discount rate and no terminal values
farm management chapter 17
23
Internal Rate of Return
The internal rate of return (IRR) is thediscount rate that would make the NPVof an investment equal to zero.
The IRR is usually calculated by computer or with a financial calculator.
farm management chapter 17
24
Annual Equivalent
The annual equivalent is an annuity thathas the same present value as theinvestment being analyzed.
Investment A: $1,370 0.2638 = $361.41Investment B: $1,272 0.2638 = $335.55
The amortization factor for 10% and 5 yearsis 0.2638 (Appendix Table 1)
farm management chapter 17
25
Financial Feasibility
• The methods presented so far analyze economic profitability
• Investors also need to look at financial feasibility
• Will the investment generate sufficient cash flow at the right times to meet required cash outflows?
farm management chapter 17
26
Table 17-5 Cash Flow Analysis
Net cash Debt Net cash Net cash Debt Net cashYear revenue payment flow revenue payment flow
1 3,000 2,800 200 1,000 2,800 -1,800 2 3,000 2,640 360 2,000 2,640 -640 3 3,000 2,480 520 3,000 2,480 520 4 3,000 2,320 680 4,000 2,320 1,6805 3,000 2,160 840 6,000 2,160 3,840
Investment BInvestment A
$10,000 loan at 8% interest with equal principal payments
farm management chapter 17
27
Income Taxes, Inflation, and Risk
• Different investments may have different effects on income taxes so they should be compared on an after-tax basis
• If net cash revenues and terminal values are adjusted for expected inflation, the discount rate should also be adjusted
• Investments with higher risk should be assigned a higher discount factor
farm management chapter 17
28
Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is a process ofasking several “what if” questions. Whatif net cash revenues are higher or lower?What if the timing is different? What ifthe discount rate were higher or lower?Change one or more values andrecalculate NPV and IRR.
farm management chapter 17
29
Summary
The future value of a sum of money isgreater than its present value becauseof the interest that could be earned. Investments can be analyzed using:payback period, simple rate of return,net present value, and internal rate ofreturn.
farm management chapter 17
30
2. Explain the difference between compounding and discounting.
• Compounding finds the future value of a present value using a compound interest rate.
• Discounting finds the present value of some future value, using a discount rate. They are inverse relationships.
farm management chapter 17
31
. Discuss economic profitability and financial feasibility. How are they different? Why should both be considered
when analyzing a potential investment?
• Economic profitability refers to an investment having a NPV greater than zero and an IRR greater than the opportunity cost of capital.
• This means the investment will earn a rate of return at least equal to this opportunity cost so there will be an economic profit. Cash flow needed to make principal and interest payments are not included in these analyses because it is assumed that the results are independent of how the investment is financed.
farm management chapter 17
32
. Discuss economic profitability and financial feasibility. How are they different? Why should both be considered
when analyzing a potential investment?
• Financial feasibility is concerned with the periodic net cash flows from the investment and becomes particularly important when capital must be borrowed to finance the investment. It is entirely possible for an investment to be economically profitable but result in negative net cash flows for several time periods. This often occurs when the loan must be paid off in a relatively short period of time and the investment produces little initial cash flow but larger flows in later time periods.
farm management chapter 17
33
8. What two approaches can be used to account for the effects of income taxes in investment analysis?
• a) All cash flows can be estimated on a before-tax basis and a tax-free discount rate can be used.
• b) All cash flows can be adjusted by the amount by which income taxes would increase or decrease them and an after-tax discount rate used (before-tax rate multiplied by 1 minus the marginal tax rate).
farm management chapter 17
34
9. What two approaches can be used to account for the effects of inflation in investment analysis?
• a) All cash flows can be estimated as real values (current dollars) and the discount rate used can be a real rate (subtract the expected rate of inflation from the nominal discount rate).
• b) All cash flows can be increased over time by their expected rates of inflation and a nominal discount rate can be used.
farm management chapter 17
35
10. Why would capital budgeting be useful in analyzing an investment of establishing an orchard where the trees
would not become productive until 6 years after planting?
• Many tree and vine crops have several years of expenses with little or no income while the planting reaches its productive age. There is a serious mismatch in the timing of cash expenses and cash revenue. The only way to analyze an investment of this type is to use capital budgeting so the timing of all cash flows is taken into account using an appropriate discount rate or opportunity cost of capital.
farm management chapter 17
36
11. What advantages would present value techniques have over partial budgeting for
analyzing the orchard investment in question 10? • A partial budget would compare the orchard investment
with some other alternative using changes in average annual expenses and revenues. It would be difficult to estimate average annual expenses and revenues for the orchard because they are different for every year. To do it correctly, adjustments must be made for differences in the timing of revenue and expenses. In most cases it will be easier and less time consuming to use present value techniques on a problem of this type. However, the concept of added and reduced cash flows can also be used with capital budgeting techniques.