21
Auto AC ENGR-4020 Presenters: Seth Bowman, Carson Camp, Elizabeth Clarke, Nicholas Tate 1

Fall Final Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fall Final Presentation

Auto ACENGR-4020Presenters:

Seth Bowman, Carson Camp, Elizabeth Clarke, Nicholas Tate

1

Page 2: Fall Final Presentation

Project Faculty

Dr. O. Hayden GriffinProject SponsorFaculty Advisor

Additional Assistance Provided ByDr. Tarek Abdel-Salam - ReferenceEast Carolina University - Funding

2

Page 3: Fall Final Presentation

What is the problem with Auto AC?

Problem Statement:

Current automotive air conditioners are

complicated and take up space within the car.

Description:

This project will produce a new automotive

air conditioner that reduces complexity and

does not use an engine run compressor.

3

Page 4: Fall Final Presentation

Key EDS Factors

4

Functional PerformanceRemove 18000 BTU’s of heat

Human FactorsAll moving parts self-contained within unit to mitigate dangers

EconomicShould match estimated market price of $1,500

Maintenance, Repair, and RetirementNo less than 25% professionally replaceable/repairable partsAble to be disposed of without special handling needs

PollutionWill not exceed GWP of 1430

Page 5: Fall Final Presentation

Decision Matrix

5

Page 6: Fall Final Presentation

Thermoelectric Materials

Governed by the Peltier Effect Typically Made of Bismuth Telluride and CopperUtilize N and P Type Semiconductors

6

Page 7: Fall Final Presentation

Small Scale Lab Model

7

Page 8: Fall Final Presentation

Thermoelectric Testing

Procedure:3 minute test of Current

Results:60 Watts75 BTU of heat removal

8

Page 9: Fall Final Presentation

Car Testing

9

Test Vehicle: 2012 Chevy Sonic

Test Software: HPTuners VCMScanner

Test Procedure:

2x 3 minute idle tests

2x 3 minute driving tests

Page 10: Fall Final Presentation

Car Testing - Data

10

Page 11: Fall Final Presentation

Comparison of Data

11

Assumptions:• Compressor Power Increases Linearly with

RPM• Fuel to electric conversion efficiency of 21%

(engine 40%, belt 98%, alternator 55%)• Manufacturer specified 72W max power

consumption for thermoelectric

Page 12: Fall Final Presentation

Data Comparison - Compressor vs TE

12

Page 13: Fall Final Presentation

Development of System

13

Design Philosophy- Minimize cost and complexity by reusing existing components wherever possible.

Page 14: Fall Final Presentation

Thermoelectric Implementation

14

Components:

1x Aluminum mounting block

2x Tellurex SL1210 TE Units(170 BTU, 120W)

1x Stainless Cooling Pipe

Page 15: Fall Final Presentation

Thermoelectric Assembly

15

Page 16: Fall Final Presentation

System Plumbing

16

Heater Core Inlet

Heater Core OutletComponents

TE Assembly (1)

1 Quart Reservoir (2)

Electric Fluid Pump (3)

Cooling fluid (Water or

Water/Glycol)(1)

(2)

(3)

Page 17: Fall Final Presentation

System Wiring

17

Vehicle Switched 12V

Components

TE Assembly (1)

Switch (2)

Electric Fluid Pump (3)

Fuse Block (4)

2x 15 amp for TE

1x 10 amp for

pump

1x 2 amp for

switch

(1)

(2)

(3)

Vehicle 12V from Relay

Relay

(4)

Page 18: Fall Final Presentation

Economic Analysis

18

Page 19: Fall Final Presentation

Recommendations

Install the system in a car currently lacking AC Use the bill of materials and provided drawingsNot recommended to replace compressors

19

Page 20: Fall Final Presentation

Conclusions

Good alternative for cars without an air conditioning systemThermoelectrics suitable for mild coolingToo large for most vehiclesCould have more applications as technology advances

20

Page 21: Fall Final Presentation

Questions?

21