Failures of Record Keeping

8/13/2019 Failures of Record Keeping

1/11

1

Failures of record keeping Victorian Ombudsman Reports

Public Record Office Victoria - Records Management Network Meeting

Tuesday 29 May 2012

Presentation by John R Taylor, Deputy Ombudsman for Victoria.

_________________________________________________________________

It is disappointing to find in a modern public service that very often

Ombudsman investigations identify significant failures in record keeping.

These failures include:

Poor record keeping Inadequate storage The destruction of records Falsification of records Lack of records in key decision making.

What are records?

Very often our investigations identify that only paper records are maintained.That is, copies and originals of correspondence to and from an agency.

However, when we delve further into an investigation we identify key decision

making is often recorded in email, faxes and notes not maintained on the

departmental file.

For example, in the Ombudsmans investigation into the probity of the Hotel

Windsor redevelopment tabled in Parliament in February 20111, we identified

that the department of Planning and Community Development together with

Heritage Victoria failed to make and keep adequate records regarding the Hotel

Windsor planning and heritage permit application. These failures were

particularly important as there had been significant media attention surrounding

the then Ministers media plan regarding the development which wasinadvertently sent to an ABC journalist in February 2010. Subsequently, the

Chairman of the Legislative Council Standing Committee on Finance and Public

Administration requested that the Ombudsman investigate the probity of the

Hotel Windsor redevelopment.

You would think that when you are looking at a multi million dollar

redevelopment that good record keeping would be an essential part of the

decision making process by any government agency. However, our

investigation found poor management practices, including the failure of officers

to file documents accurately and to folio files.

1Ombudsman Investigation into the Probity of the Hotel Windsor Redevelopment, February

2011


2/11

2

You will see in our report that we identify numerous occasions where significant

meetings took place for which there was inadequate or no records made. When

it came to testing what had taken place it was very hard to establish the

sequence of events. The Ombudsman noted that he was concerned that several

witnesses also said that the failure of the department and Heritage Victoria tomaintain adequate records was not restricted to the Hotel Windsor planning

and heritage permit applications.

Emails are also a great source of information when determining what took place

in relation to decision making. Very often we find information that puts the lie to

documented decision making or provides amplification as to what took place.

Very often copies of these emails are not filed on the departmental file.

Poor record keeping

Perhaps the most significant failure which we consistently identify is poorrecord keeping. A good example, of this is the investigation into record keeping

failures by WorkSafe agents tabled in Parliament in May 2011.2That

investigation identified poor record keeping at WorkSafe agents, of which there

were six at the time. These are agents paid for a range of benefits provided to

injured workers including weekly payments, medical treatment, ambulance

transport, and personal and household help.

In 2009-10, WorkSafe paid its agents fees of over $200 million to manage over

56,000 claims by injured workers in Victoria.

The investigation identified poor record keeping at the agents, which had the

following consequences:

Manipulation of the WorkSafe incentive scheme for agents Delays in payment Poor and delayed decision making and the reduced effectiveness of the

scheme

Breaches of privacy.Poor recording keeping at the agents was as a result of inadequate file

maintenance; inadequate understanding of statutory obligations; and out dated

information technology systems.

2Investigation into Record Keeping Failures by WorkSafe agents,May 2011


3/11

3

Photograph 1

Photograph 2


4/11

4

Photograph 3

Photographs 1, 2 and 3 are examples of the poor file maintenance and storage

systems at a number of the WorkSafe agents. You can see that, by their very

nature, the files and their condition contributed to incorrect information being

sent to individuals, medical records being lost or misplaced, and delayed

decision making.

Contraband is often seized within prisons and detention centres. It is then theresponsibility of Victoria Police to take appropriate action.


5/11

5

Photograph 4

Photograph 4 is a seizure or exhibit located during an inspection at the Juvenile

Justice Detention Centre. It contained contraband which was found on

detainees during a search. There were no names, dates or identifying details in

relation to the seizure.

Inadequate storage

Our investigation into the storage and management of ward records by the

Department of Human Services tabled in Parliament in March 2012, exemplifies

the problems that can occur when agencies fail to adequately record and store

departmental records.


6/11

6

Photograph 5

Photograph 6


7/11

7

Photograph 7

Photographs 5, 6 and 7 illustrate boxes of records held by the department that

are stored in approximately 80 linear kilometres of files on shelves. These

historical records relate to former wards of the State of Victoria and are stored

in boxes at numerous locations.

The department has not inspected or indexed a considerable portion of these

records. Accordingly, it cannot provide an accurate estimate of what portion ofthe total holding relates to wards of the State.

Despite having had the majority of these records in its archives for over 15 years

the department has only indexed and catalogue records relating to 26 of the

150 plus years worth of records relating to wards and institutions it holds. The

majority of these records remain in large part uninspected, unindexed and

unscanned.

The department is paying near $1 million a year to rent a facility that has been

identified as being inadequate to store records and has been subject to flooding

and rat infestation.

The departments efforts to come to grips with its vast archive of documentshave been piecemeal and ultimately unsuccessful.

Increasing numbers of former wards are seeking access to records relating to

their time spent in care as a way to not only understand their past but also to

seek and identify siblings and relatives. An internal departmental report noted

that in the three years prior to May 2011 approximately 21 per cent of all

searches for records relating to freedom of information requests for former

ward and adoption records resulted in no documents being located.

Prisoner health records

Under the Health Records Act 2001medical information must be stored

confidentially to protect the privacy of individuals.


8/11

8

All prisoner medical records at the Melbourne Assessment Prison are held on

site. Although these records are monitored by medical staff, one of their

physical locations is in a thoroughfare and is accessible to all staff.

Photograph 8

Photograph 8 shows medical records stored on open shelves at the Melbourne

Assessment Prison. This situation was identified in our investigation intoprisoner access to health care in a report tabled in parliament in August 2011.

As a result of bringing this issue to the attention of Justice Health the then

Director advised that Justice Health was in the process of designing the

refurbishment of office space and storage and that lockable cupboards were

now in place for the storage of medical records in the centre.

Destruction of records

It is not uncommon to find departmental records missing during an

investigation. This is particularly the case where misconduct is involved as was

identified in our investigation into procurement3, where in a number of

instances officers obtained a benefit from a supplier of toner cartridges and the

invoices had been destroyed.

In one case involving a project officer from Arts Victoria the invoices which

listed gifts that the officer had received were missing. When questioned about

this, the project officer said I generally did not keep copies of the invoices. In

this particular case we were able to establish from invoices obtained from the

company that in 2009-10, the project officer received $8,300 in Coles-Myer

vouchers and prepaid visa cards from the company.

3Corrupt Conduct by Pubic Officers in Procurement,June 2011


9/11

9

In another case in 2009 involving a building inspector at a council, the councils

hard copy building file for a property involved in an unorthodox transaction,

could not be located. When questioned the building inspector acknowledged

that a hard copy file for the 2008 building inspections had existed but denied

destroying it, despite having told his manager that he had done so.4

Falsification of records

Departmental records, by their very nature, are required to represent the history

of a case, transaction or business event. However, at times we have identified

instances where records have been falsified to cover up improper conduct.

In an investigation involving the allegation of mistreatment of a male resident of

a supported residential service managed by the Department of Human

Services5, we identified that two documents allegedly created in response to

the incident were fabricated by a senior staff member to give the false

impression that the department had investigated the matter. This of course

amounts to serious misconduct and as a result discipline action was takenagainst the officer.

Improper use of records

There are times when departmental offices will improperly use information for

their own purposes. In one case, an employee of the Victorian Institute of

Forensic Medicine6took home autopsy information concerning deceased

persons for their own prurient interest. When we obtained access to his

computer and records at his home we located 49 hard copy autopsy reports

and over 1,200 work related photographs on a CD and hard drive of his

computer.

In addition we identified that this person had been circulating photographs of

inquest material to friends for their enjoyment. The officer resigned during the

investigation.

4Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001, Conflict of Interest and Abuse of Power by the

building inspector of the Brimbank City Council, June 20095Ombudsman Investigation, Assault of a Disability Service Client by Department of Human

Services Staff, March 20116Investigation into the Improper Release of Autopsy Information by a Victorian Institute of

Forensic Medicine employee, May 2011


10/11

10

Lack of records in key decision making

Good public administration requires that key decision making be adequately

documented. This is particularly important where significant government

expenditure is involved.

It is concerning when our enquiries identify that decision making in relation tomajor public expenditure is either not documented or poorly documented.

Photograph 9

One example as illustrated in photograph 9 was that the only document located

which established the expenditure of over $27 million in relation to funding for a

major IT project within Victoria Police, was a one page document with hand

written annotations.

This document was illustrative of a poorly run area within a major organisation

where numerous documents were located in unregistered and informal files.

Interviewees also said that files they knew had been raised could not be

located. Further enquiries identified that a number of decisions taken at a

committee level were not documented in signed records.7

More recently in our investigation into the Food Bowl Modernisation Project the

investigation identified that the decision to commit significant funding in

relation to the Food Bowl Modernisation Project was based on oral discussions

and earlier projects with virtually no documentation to support the decision

making. The background report which had been commissioned by a private

organisation and provided to the then Treasurer could not be located.

7Own Motion Investigation into the Tendering and Contracting of Information Technology

Services within Victoria Police, November 2009


11/11

11

Subsequently the government committed to $600 million without adequate

planning or documentation.8

Conclusion

The Ombudsmans statutory function is to investigation complaints aboutadministrative actions. Inevitably our stories are about wrong doing, errors and

mistakes. However the case studies are illustrative of where things go wrong

and how such problems could be avoided by careful planning and

management.

Even the wrong doing identified for example in the toner affair could have been

prevented by appropriate supervision and management of expenditure and

records.

We frequently ask the question Who is responsible?. It is easy to blame the

individual who failed to keep the record or destroyed a document. However

there is also a responsibility in terms of leadership within an organisation.The challenge for the public sector is to ensure that not only do managers lead

by example but also to encourage staff to act appropriately in all

circumstances.

The Ombudsman has regularly reported on his concerns about the failure of

leadership in the public sector. Many of the problems identified in our

investigations are because of a lack of leadership and management.

Good leadership in the public sector is important because it:

Assists in developing a culture where administrative excellence andethical conduct is encouraged

Protects against improper conduct and can assist in its early detection Ensures adequate scrutiny is applied to areas such as expenditure of

public funds

Sets and achieves realistic and beneficial goals Establishes an operating norm of efficiency and diligence.

Despite progress made by some agencies, we continue to identify agencies that

fail to learn from their mistakes and fail to fully implement revised policies and

procedures that our enquiries and investigations have identified.

8Investigation into the Food Bowl Modernisation Project and Related Matters, November

2011

Documents

Failures of Record Keeping