8/7/2019 Fact_Value_Policy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/factvaluepolicy 1/2

Fact, Value, PolicyExamine each statement to determine whether it is an appropriate working thesis for a question of  FACT,

VALUE,  POLICY, or none.

 

• A fact claim is an argumentative thesis which makes a quantifiable assertion; in other words, it is an argument

(claim) about a measurable topic (fact).• A value claim is an argumentative thesis which makes a qualifiable assertion; in other words, it is an

argument (claim) about a moral, aesthetic, or philosophical topic (value).

• A policy claim is an argumentative thesis which makes an assertion about a course of action the reader should

take; in other words, it is an argument (claim) about an actionable topic (policy).

 

 a. President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew in advance about the Japanese plan to attack Pearl Harbor and

allowed it to happen.

 

b. If Franklin D. Roosevelt knew in advance about the Japanese plan to attack Pearl Harbor, he was wrong in

allowing it to happen. 

c. Using lie detector tests as screening devices for jobs in private business is a violation of the employee’sright to privacy.

 

d. The use of lie detector tests for screening employees in private business should be banned by law.

 

e. A federal law should be passed requiring that trunk safety releases be standard on all new cars sold in the

United States.

 

f. If trunk safety releases were standard equipment on all cars sold in the United States, we could save severalhundred lives every year.

 

g. Colorizing classic movies such as Casablanca violates the artistic integrity of such movies.

 

h. Congress should protect the artistic integrity of movies such as Casablanca by passing a law prohibiting

the colorization of classic American films.

8/7/2019 Fact_Value_Policy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/factvaluepolicy 2/2

 

Understanding Claims

A fact claim is a statement about how things were in the past, how they are in the present, or how they will be

in the future. A fact claim is not a fact; it only claims to be a fact. What makes it arguable is that the speaker has

no direct way of establishing the truth of the claim. For example, "The Earth is round" is a proven fact. "In ourright-handed world, left-handed people are discriminated against" is a fact claim. A persuasive speaker must

provide arguments which build a case in favour of the claim, showing that the claim is probably true, or at least

is more likely true than false.

Value claims are arguable statements concerning the relative merits of something which is measured

subjectively (e.g., "Victoria is a better place to go for summer vacation than Calgary"). What makes a value

claim arguable is that different people may disagree on the criteria used to evaluate something (e.g., weather,

live entertainment, water sports). Differing value claims may be used to argue the value of a variety of topics

(e.g., movies, styles of living, community organizations). Defending a value claim involves offering a set of 

criteria for consideration, defending the set of criteria as legitimate, and showing how applying the criteria

justifies the claim.

A policy claim is a statement regarding the merits of one course of action as opposed to other courses of action.

What makes a policy claim arguable is that, even though people and institutions may not be totally certain about

the proper course of action to take, they still must act. To argue in defence of a policy claim is to state that,

given the knowledge we have at the present time, it is best to act in the manner proposed rather than in some

alternative way.

Samples:

Fact claim: The death penalty does not deter crime.

Value claim: Since it is inequitably administered, capital punishment is unjust.

Policy claim: Because it does not deter crime, because it is inequitably administered, and because it is unjust,the death penalty should be abandoned by civilized societies.

Fact claim: Smoking marijuana is less harmful to one's health than smoking cigarettes is.

Value claim: The prejudices about the social conditions that led to current marijuana legislation are outdated.

Policy claim: Because the social conditions that gave rise to current marijuana legislation no longer exist and

because of the potential medical and financial benefits of its decriminalization, lawmakers should reconsider the

legal status of cannabis.

 

Fact claim: Changes in land use patterns in Southern California over the past 100 years have rendered the Salton

Sea the single most important waterway in the West for migrating waterfowl.

Value claim: The presence and availability of wildlife enriches human life.

Policy claim: Congress must pass effective legislation to ensure the restoration and continued maintenance of 

the Salton Sea so that loss of avifauna does not diminish human existence.

 

Fact claim: Public school performance in the United States has plummeted over the past 20 years.

Value Claim: It is unfair to force taxpayers to contribute to a school system that does not serve them.

Policy Claim: Following the Canadian system, Congress should form a system for public funding of religious

schools for families that opt out of the public school system.