Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Factors influencingFactors influencing skeletal malformations i A t li lt din Australian cultured
marine finfish
Jennifer Cobcroft Barbara NowakMalcolm BrownStephen BattagleneStephen Battaglene
TAFI is a joint venture between the State Government and the University of Tasmania
Outline
• Australian marine fish aquaculture industry
• Survey of hatcheries
• Species malformation case studiesp
• Future research direction
Australian Aquaculture
• Total finfish industry value 2007-08 AU$546 million; 41 200 t *AU$546 million; 41,200 t *
Salmonids Southern Bluefin Tuna
* ABARE, 2009
AU$299 million; >25,500 t AU$187 million; 9,800 t
Australian Aquaculture
• Marine fish value (based on hatchery produced fry)~AU$57 million; ~ 5 600 t *~AU$57 million; ~ 5,600 t
• Major speciesBarramundi (Lates calcarifer)Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) AU$34 million; 3,360 t
Yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi)
Mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus)
Australian bass (Maquaria novemaculeata)
* ABARE, 2009
3 spp combined < AU$23 million; 2,240 t
Australian Aquaculture• Species under development
Flowery grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus)• Flowery grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus)
• Gold Spot grouper (Epinephelus coioides)
• Cobia (Rachycentron canadum)• Cobia (Rachycentron canadum)
• Striped trumpeter (Latris lineata)
• Australian snapper (Pagrus auratus)pp ( g )
• Southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii)
Images courtesy of L. Woolley and Clean Seas Tuna
Australian AquacultureTarget to increase finfish aquaculture
production from 41,000 toproduction from 41,000 to 100,000 tonnes by 2015 *
2 mm
Provision of sufficient numbers of high quality fry is a bottleneck to industry expansion
• What are the issues at the hatchery level?
* Hone, 2008 (FRDC Fish 16(2), 14-17)
Hatchery Survey
• Survey emailed to 26 marine fish hatcheriesF ll ith t l h i t i• Follow-up with telephone interview
• incidence and severity of skeletal malformations
• perceived impact on hatchery production
• techniques used to rear larvae
• Hatchery informationkept confidential
Hatchery Survey• Responses from 18 hatcheries (69%)
• Samples from 2 ‘no issue’ hatcheries had >5% severe malformations (i e 56% hatcheries with an issue)
* Minimal production 2008-2009
malformations (i.e. 56% hatcheries with an issue)– more work to be done
Barramundi• Spinal Normal Short body
*
LordosisVertebral body – compression, dorsal or ventral shift in centre*
Barramundi• Jaw - occasional
Images providedImages provided by Darwin
Aquaculture CentreCentre
Solved by changing th i l lthe commercial algae pastes for rotifer and
larval culture *
Normal jaw Subtle deformedjaw
Medium deformedjaw
* Bosmans personal communication; Schipp et al 2007
Barramundi• Jaw - occasional
‘Pinched’ lower *Normal
* Similar to the description of Fraser and de Nys, 2005
Grouper• Epinephelus fuscoguttatus and Epinephelus coioides
• Jaw (maxilla, dentary) and some spinal
Day 24. E. fus. Day 40. E. fus. Day 40. E. fus.
D 32 E fDay 40. E. fus. normal Day 40. E. fus.
Day 32. E. fus.
Day 42. E. coi.
Yellowtail kingfish• Jaw – several malformation types
Yellowtail kingfish• Jaw – several malformation types
Yellowtail kingfish• Jaw – several malformation types
Yellowtail kingfish
• Jaw – onset of fusion from day 11
Maxilla located inside lower jawjDay 11
0.5 mm 0 5 mm0.5 mm
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
Yellowtail kingfish
• Jaw – onset of fusion, force exerted on maxilla and premaxilla by lower jawmaxilla and premaxilla by lower jaw movement
Striped trumpeter• Occasional spinal
Striped trumpeter
Day 44 1Jaw
0Jaw
malformation index
2
0.5
3
Striped trumpeterOnset of jaw malformation
Jaw score
80
10000.512
Jaw scoreco
re (%
)
60
23
Jaw
s
20
40
27 30 35 41 50 57 63 70 79 90 1000
Age (days post-hatching)
Striped trumpeter
• Conducted a series of experiments (di t d i t l f t )(dietary and environmental factors)
• Experimental system – 24 x 300 L tanksC t ll d h t i d t t• Controlled photoperiod, temperature
• Flow through, recirculation or both• Ozonated seawater
Striped trumpeter
• Live feed - Artemia enrichment with Vitamin C– Larvae fed Artemia Day 17 to Day 44– Multifactor experiment (Vit C and prey density)
Artemia with Vitamin C enrichment (ascorbic acid– Artemia with Vitamin C enrichment (ascorbic acid, aa, 7,900 µg g-1) and without (aa 640 µg g-1)
– 4 Artemia densities (0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mL-1), ( , , ),fed 4x daily
Battaglene et al, unpublished data
Striped trumpeter
• Live feed - Artemia enrichment with Vitamin CDay 44Day 44
) 80
100 Lower incidence with Vitamin C (8%) enrichment than
scor
e (%
)
40
60without (11%)
Jaw
20
40
1-NI
L0.
5-NI
L0.
25-N
IL0.
125-
NIL
1-VI
TC0.
5-VI
TC0.
25-V
ITC
125-
VITC
0
Battaglene et al, unpublished data
Treatment diet
0 0 0 0.1
Striped trumpeter
• Tank colour, enrichment & water type– Tank colour (black & white)– Diet (enriched & non-enriched)– Water type (green & clear)ate type (g ee & c ea )
• Larvae cultured Day 1 to Day 29• Rotifers Day 6 – Day 19• Artemia Day 18 – Day 29• Assessed growth, survival, jaw malformation• Daily assessment of larval walling behaviour
Cobcroft et al, unpublished data
Striped trumpeter
Away from wall
Walling behaviourWalling behaviour
Results – jaw malformationA) Day 15
80
100
0 0 5
B) Day 20
80
1007.5 mm when malformation first observed
Jaw
sco
re (%
)
40
60
0.5 1 2 3
40
60Day 29In clearwater treatments
first observed
0
20
C) Day 24100
D) Day 29100
0
20 treatments WH CL AM 70 ± 15%> all others
scor
e (%
)
40
60
80
40
60
80In black tanksCW > GWAM > NE
CL NE
CL AM
CL NE
CL AM
R NE
R AM
Jaw
0
20
40
CL NE
CL AM
CL NE
CL AM
GR NE
R AM
0
20
40 AM > NE
Treatment
WH C
LW
H CL
BL CL
BL CL
BL GR
BL GR
Treatment
WH C
LW
H CL
BL CL
BL CL
BL GR
BL GR
Cobcroft et al, unpublished data
Results – walling behaviour
100
g (%
) 80
WH CL NEWH CL AMBL CL NEBL CL AMBL GR NE
on w
allin
40
60BL GR NEBL GR AM
Prop
orti
20
10 15 20 25 30
0
Age (days)Mean + SD
Cobcroft et al, unpublished data
Results j lf ti lli- jaw malformation vs walling
Correlation between jaw malformation and wallingj gs
(%) 100 AM
r2 = 0.830P < 0.001
orm
ed ja
ws
60
80
with
mal
fo
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Larv
ae w
0
20 NE - nsr2 = 0.197P = 0.148
Proportion walling (%)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Cobcroft et al, unpublished data
Comparison with tank colour
Tank colour• Design: 6 tank
colours, 4 reps• Larvae culturedLarvae cultured
Day 16 to Day 44• Daily assessment
of larval wallingof larval walling
Cobcroft & Battaglene, 2009 (Aquaculture 289: 274-282)
Comparison with tank colour
100 black blue
ling
(%)
60
80
blue green marble red white
Walling behaviour
port
ion
wal
l
40
60Pr
op
0
20
Age (days)20 25 30 35 40 45
Mean ± SD
Cobcroft & Battaglene, 2009 (Aquaculture 289: 274-282)
Comparison with tank colour100
0 0 5
Jaw score
re (%
)60
80 0.5 1 2 3
Jaw malformation
Jaw
sco
r
40Day 44
k e e n d e
0
20
Tank colour
black
marble blu
e
gree
n
red
white
Cobcroft & Battaglene, Aquaculture 2009
0 Correlation between jaw malformation and walling
Day 44aw
s (%
)
60
80
Day 442 0 871
alfo
rmed
ja
40
60 r2 = 0.871P < 0.001
3
ae w
ith m
a
20
1 mm0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Larv
0
Proportion walling (%)
Cobcroft & Battaglene, 2009 (Aquaculture 289: 274-282)
Striped trumpeter• Improvement in quality of larvae from production trials• 75% fish with normal & minor malformations at75% fish with normal & minor malformations at
Day 100 in 2 trials in 2006 & 2007
2005STT1 05
2007STT2 07 Tank 2
80
10000.512
STT1-05
80
10000.512
STT2-07 Tank 2
aw s
core
(%)
40
60
23
aw s
core
(%)
40
60
23
25 28 30 34 39 45 50 60 70 80 90 100
126
153
170
187
197
200
Ja
0
20
20 23 25 30 36 37 40 50 60 71 80 91 100
Ja
0
20
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
Striped trumpeter
• Live feed - rotifer enrichment with Vitamin A (retinol palmitate)Vitamin A (retinol palmitate)– Larvae stocked at day 1
R tif i h d ith 8 diff t ti l– Rotifers enriched with 8 different retinol palmitate levels (enrichments contained: 0, 100, 300, 750, 1500, 3000, 5000, 10000 mg L-1; NutraKol)
– Rotifers fed day 6 to 18Artemia (all AlgaMac 3050 enriched) fed day– Artemia (all AlgaMac 3050 enriched) fed day 17 to 43
Negm et al, unpublished data
Striped trumpeter
Slightly higher atJaw score
Day 43
Slightly higher at lower VA doses 100 and 300 mg L-1.
Overall, jaw malformation higher than tank colour experimentexperiment.
Analysis of live feed VA profile and other
lf timalformations are underway.
Negm et al, unpublished data
Future Research
• Striped trumpeter (ARC Linkage) - vitamin A in live feeds on malformation and gene expression and tank systemon malformation and gene expression and tank system design
• Yellowtail kingfish (Seafood CRC)• Southern bluefin tuna (Seafood CRC, CST)• Communication with industry & identification of target
( b di)areas (e.g. barramundi)• International collaboration
5 mm
AcknowledgementsTAFI – MRL Research team StaffStephen Battaglene
PhD CandidateReham Negmp g
Alan BeechJenny CobcroftMelanie EvansRoss Goldsmid
g
Tanaz JungalwallaTom Litjens Anna Overweter Gavin ShawBill Wilkinson
Acknowledgements
Hatchery and Research staff of Clean Seas Tuna
D i A lt C t NT DRDPIFRDarwin Aquaculture Centre – NT DRDPIFRNorthern Fisheries Centre – QDPI
Huon Aquaculture CompanyNutraKolSkrettinggClean Seas TunaTasmanian Government