Upload
gaura-keshava
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Facebook on Radhas Feet
1/5
There are a few different points being taken up by different devotees here. First I want to
agree with Hctor Rosario that the letter from Prabhupada is ONLY about seeing the
feet not touching the feet which is a completely different matter. Touching of deities feet
or any other part of the deity is in most parts of India ONLY done by a pujari. The
exceptions to this as noted by Hari P r ada D s are in some temples in Maharastra and
Orissa (Vittala and Puri Jagannatha) where visiting devotees can perform Sparshan(touching) of the deity as well as the normal Darshan (seeing and being seen by the
deity).
Concerning this tradition in some places of touching of deities by those who are not
pujaris. The idea seems to be that the deity is pure and by touching the deity one also
becomes pure. However normally the idea is that one (even a pujari) is not pure and
should become pure first before touching the deity. In either case the idea is that
contamination and purity is spread by touch. In our Vaisnava sampradayas mostly it is
explained that one must first be purified by the pancaratric samskara of diksha before
being allowed to touch the body of the deity (and also for other things that require one tobe sanctified). Secondly even after diksha one should be physically pure by taking
proper ritual bath, wearing proper ritual attire, tilaka, etc. before going and approaching
the deity. Even after this a system of proper mental attitude by mentally destroying the
impure physical body of the devotee and creating a completely pure spiritual body called
Bhuta Suddhi is gone through before the pujari touches the deity. Thereafter the pujari
will respectfully take permission from his guru parampara to approach and serve the
deity directly. All these steps are normally gone through before one can approach the
deity.
The idea that female deity's feet should not be touched by a male pujari is not correct.
There was no restriction like this spoken of by Prabhupada. In fact Prabhupada
mentioned that the pujari should/must touch the feet of the deity. No exception for
female deities was ever mentioned by him. Every person who actually has experience
with worshiping the deity knows that when waking the deity the system is to enter the
deity room, light or adjust the lamps or turn on the (electric) lights, then wake the small
utsava/festival deities who are laying in bed by ringing a bell in the left hand and
touching their feet with his right hand while chanting the specific prayer for waking that
deity. This includes female deities. Of course there are some groups/sampradayas
where the mere clapping of the hands three times are considered enough to wake the
deities or at least announce the pujaris coming into the deity's bed chamber. So again
regarding the worship of female deities by males and male deities by females normallythis is not a factor because the pujari does not worship the deities in his or her physical
body but in a pure spiritual body appropriate for doing that personal worship created by
the process of Bhuta Suddhi in Vaidhi bhakti and in his Siddhadeha or spiritual form in
Raganuga bhakti. We should also note that the pujari is to meditate on himself or herself
as being a pure servant of the deities and not simply as a material male or female.
Spiritually the individual souls are all considered as "female" in the sense that we are all
7/27/2019 Facebook on Radhas Feet
2/5
dependent and meant to serve the deities.
Iconography 101: Regarding the point about markings on the feet of deities. In fact it is
possible to see some markings on the soles (bottoms) of deities feet if their feet are not
completely flat and connected to their pitham or base. For example a deity of baby
Krishna lying on His back on a banyan leaf sucking His toe (Vattapatrasayi Krishna).Many deities of Lord Krishna in the tribanga (standing three fold bending) pose will have
His right foot elevated so only the toes are flat on the base. Many deity makers do mark
the bottom of this (right) foot. Similarly they also mark the Lord's chest with a footprint
called Brighu pada or the footprint of Brighu Muni who kicked Lord Visnu in the chest.
Srivatsa markings are also normal on the right side of any Visnu tattva deities chest as
are Kaustubha markings on the left side or center. It is also common that markings are
shown on the hands of deities. Actually although some deities in North India have lines
on their hand the sastra mandates only auspicious symbols and sometimes lotus like
diagrams in the center of their palms. This is because the deity has no karma. The lines
on the hand are defined by one's karma therefore no deity can have lines on his handlike ordinary jivatmans. (This standard is followed even when making of deities of
purva/previous acharyas in South India, the idea being that these acharyas having
attained moksha no longer can be shown with signs of karmas on their hands).
Back to the main topic of showing of feet. In South India and in most temples in North
female deities are dressed quite conservatively. This is part of Indian culture. The feet of
female deities is never shown for this reason. Even men in South India sometimes wear
a vesti/lunghi very low in order to cover even their feet. The feet in India have some
cultural significances. First since they are touching the ground they are considered as
dirty, thus we often hear of people washing their feet when entering certain places like
homes or temples. Indeed some temples have tanks and other apparatus for pilgrims to
at least wash their feet before entering. Using others shoes is considered as not
acceptable and dirty also. Padya is a special washing service offered to the deities for
washing their feet. Whereas in the west we never really consider washing the feet
separately from bathing the whole body (except on rare occasions of stepping in
something dirty). Since the feet are considered as dirty one should not sit in such a way
as to point one's feet to anyone or any deity. Surrender to a person in India is
symbolized by falling at their feet, sometimes by touching their feet with one's hand or
head. Holy persons as well as deities who visit are welcomed with their feet being
washed and the holy water is then sprinkled and in some cases drunk by the hosts. The
Lord's bathing water is in fact called caranamrta which literally means "the nectar fromthe feet" even though it contains not only water (Padya) used for washing His feet but
also the rest of His body as well. So we can see that the feet are not only seen as dirty
but also the place where one must go to surrender and attain the mercy of the person.
Despite this females are supposed to be dressed conservatively not showing the feet. In
North India we see female deities with their saris covering their heads which is the
custom since the Muslim invasions of around 1000 ce. In South India in contrast this
7/27/2019 Facebook on Radhas Feet
3/5
custom of covering the head by females is not common amongst the people in general
so similarly isn't done when dressing female deities either. Prabhupada had certainly
made reference to covering of the head of female deities in accordance with North
Indian custom. He also instructed us not to show female deities hair. Womens hair (even
men's hair) in India is normally tied up in a braid (male's sikhas are tied by not in a
braid). Thus the modern western tradition of untied hair is not to be used when dressingfemale deities.
The next point I want to stress is that Prabhupada always told us that our worship of
Radha Krishna in ISKCON was to be done in the mood of Laksmi Narayana. Radha
Krishna live in a rural area where they would have been adorned with simple village
garb and forest flowers. Krishna is described as having a bamboo flute. Yet ISKCON
deities are dressed in the finest of silks with many jewels and golden or silver flutes.
Indeed even the Gopa dressing of Radha shown by Visuddha-sattva Das in another
posting shows her with a gold flute. This is mixture of rasas. Otherwise known as
rasabhasa. The mood of Vrndavan is very simple rural mood. Thus sometimes we seein temples like Radha Raman the deity wears shorts or even only kaupina (underwear)
on hot summer days. But the worship in awe and reverence or opulence of Laksmi
Narayana in Vaikuntha does not allows such intimate displays. So one rasa or taste is
the opulent taste of aishvarya with awe and reverence and the other is the sweet simple
taste of rural cowherd community. The difference in this taste or rasa is determined by
the attitude of the worshiper.
Now some devotees may personally be advanced enough to manifest that attitude of
sweet simple rural style worship which accompanies the worship of the Lord in
Raganuga bhakti. But Prabhupada wanted that only the mood of aishvarya or opulence
and awe and reverence be displayed in the public temples of ISKCON. So while I have
no problem which such intimate displays being made by advanced raganuga bhaktas in
their personal home worship. The ISKCON temple worship of Radha Krishna is
supposed always to be done according to the principles and rasa/taste of Vaidhi bhakti.
Now I would perhaps make an exception for the temple in Vrndavan itself where the
other traditional major temples are perhaps doing some dressing in different moods on
specific occasions only. Of course during Prabhupada's time we did not do this because
he specifically ordered us to worship Radha Krishna in the mood of Laksmi Narayana.
Still even if we disregard this and make some exceptions to this prohibition on occasions
like Radhastami or Gopastami still this must be understood to be an exception to the
rule not to be emulated in each and very place in the ISKCON world. One can perhapsjustify dressing Radha as a cowboy in Vrndavan but how can it be justified in LA? Of
course I expect many may disagree with me. And I would remind them to think of what
Prabhupada himself would say if we dressed Radha as a cowboy in LA? I am not
against displays of raganuga worship only that it should be in ISKCON limited to
personal deities and not transferred to the worship standard of the ISKCON temple
which was clearly defined by Prabhupada.
7/27/2019 Facebook on Radhas Feet
4/5
There are other customs that have been adopted into ISKCON temple worship that do
not even conform to Vaisnava practice at all. The one that comes to mind is the dressing
of Jagannath and Balarama as Ganesha after the Snana Yatra ritual. This is a custom
adopted from the temple in Puri where the deity worship is not purely Vaisnava. It was
first performed to appease a great mayavadi devotee of Ganapati (Ganesha). As suchthis custom finds no place in Vaisnava worship whatsoever, neither in Vaidhi nor
Raganuga forms of worship. Secondly even if it is attempted to be explained away by
some persons as only dressing as elephants for some lila (a form of Raganuga worship)
still it completely misleads members of the Indian community when they come to
ISKCON temples around the world (like London, Melbourne, etc) and see it. These
Hindu guests certainly do not see Gaja (Elephant) dress as simply a lila of Krishna and
Balarama but instead instantly identify the deity on the altar with the elephant head as
Ganesha. Thus their idea that Krishna and Ganesha are equal become reinforced. This
is hardly the preaching that we in ISKCON want to present to the world.
There are many other changes in deity worship that could be discussed but let us
suffice it to say that it seems that the leadership of ISKCON has not taken seriously
these changes that have crept in or endeavored to discuss and examine whether or not
they are beneficial to ISKCON's peaching mission or even bonafide from a perspective
of Vaisnava siddhanta.
Nimai Charan Das-Neeraj Wadehra Normally we see only auspicious symbols on the
feet of different personalities. Krishna's face and His name are non-different from Him. If
they are depicted on anyone's feet even Sri Radhas would that person not be walking on
the Lord's face and name? Is that not offensive? For this reason I doubt very much that
such representations are bonafide. We should look in sastra (silpa and agama) thatdescribes deities for the symbols and signs on different personalities bodies. As I stated
above this is Iconography 101. For example there is a Tamil Saivite Saint called Tiru
Jnana Sambandar who looks exactly like Lord Krishna dancing but Iconographically one
can tell the difference between a dancing child Krishna deity and a deity of this Saiva
Saint ONLY by which leg is raised in the air. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambandar
Similarly there are certain weapons and other things held in the hands of deities and
poses of the hands (mudras) that indicate what the name of the deity is. One might see
a deity and think that it is one personality and not notice that it has not got the defining
markings or accessories and is actually another personality.
Here's something to ponder over. The Gaudiya concept (and indeed the concept of the
main three Vaisnava sampradayas of North India, Gaudiya, Vallabha and Nimbarka) is
that Lord Krishna is the avatari or source of all incarnations. Whereas the older forms of
Vaisnavism followed in South India i.e. Ramanuja and Madhva sampradayas concept as
well as the general understanding of most Hindus is that Krishna is an avatar of Visnu.
We do not need to argue this point here. However when people have tried to argue this
https://www.facebook.com/nimaicharandasLShttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambandarhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambandarhttps://www.facebook.com/nimaicharandasLS7/27/2019 Facebook on Radhas Feet
5/5
question with me I make some observations. 1. If Visnu is an avatar and Krishna is the
original then why is there an appearance day when Krishna appeared (descended, the
word avatar means literally one who descends) and yet no appearance day of Visnu or
day when he descended? 2. Why do we speak of Visnu tattva as a category of deity?
Should not the deity category be Krishna tattva and Visnu belong to it and not the other
way around that Krishna belongs to the Visnu tattva category? 3. Why do we callourselves as Vaisnavas and not Krishnavas? Surely if Krishna is the original (paradigm)
then all those who follow Him are Krishnavas even those who worship His avatars Rama
and Visnu. But if Visnu is the paradign or avatari then it makes sense that even
followers and worshipers of Rama and Krishna are called Vaisnavas. 4. Iconographically
all Visnu tattva deities have the marking of Srivatsa or Laksmi on the right side of their
chest. This is the mark of Sri or Laksmi not Radha. If Krishna is the paradigm or avatari
then should not the Srivatsa be called the Radha-vatsa? And should not all Rama and
Visnu deities have a Radha-vatsa? 5. There is also a marking of the footprint of Brghu
Muni called the Brghu pada on all deities of Visnu. The lila is that Brghu kicked Visnu in
the chest. These markings are even seen on Krishna deities made in Vrndavan. Yet themark was made on the chest of Visnu? Therefore the deities made in Vrndavan that
correctly show this marking on the chest of Krishna because it is mandated by agama
and silpa sastra are showing us that Krishna is a form of Visnu and not the other way
around. 6. Why did Krishna appear in Mathura and manifest four arms a Visnu trait
before becoming transforming into a small child form? If the original form is the teenage
Krishna form then surely He would have manifest that teenage Krishna form first to
show Devaki and Vasudeva who He was before changing into a baby form. 7. It is to be
noted that there is no baby form of Visnu. Visnu always appears as a fully mature form.
Only in the avataras do we see that the Lord first appears in a young form which then
manifests the appearance of growth as the lila of the avatara unfolds. Does this also not
show that Krishna who appeared as a child and manifest the appearance of growth at
least to the teenage youthful age is an avatar and not the avatari