Upload
buimien
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
EXPLORATION STRATEGY
AND RESULT
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY
DIREKTORAT HULU
Bandung, 22nd March 2017
Eben Ezer Siahaan
Exploration & Exploitation Department
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
• Exploration Scope
• Prospect Technical Evaluation
• Scope and Survey Target in Prospect Evaluation
• Success ratio of Exploration Drilling
• Some Examples of The GGG Data Evaluation
• Working Area and Operation in PT. PGE
• Conclusion
Outline
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
A. PRODUCTION AREA 1. KAMOJANG (1,2,3,4,5): 230MW (West
Java)
2. LAHENDONG TOMPASO (1,2,3,4,5,6):
120 MW (North Sulawesi)
3. SIBAYAK 10MW (North Sumatra)
4. ULUBELU (1,2,3,4): 220MW (Lampung)
C. EXPLORATION AREA 1. BUKIT DAUN (Bengkulu)
2. MARGABAYUR (South Sumatra)
3. SEULAWAH (Aceh)
4. MASIGIT GUNTUR (West Java)
5. SEMURUP (Jambi)
6. LAWU (Central Java)
D. NEW WORKING AREA
Cooperation with Unit Business Up Stream Pertamina
Working Area and Operation in PT. PGE
B. PROJECT1. LAHENDONG UNIT: 7 & 8 etc…
2. LUMUT BALAI: 55MW (South Sumatra)
3. KERINCI: 55MW (Jambi)
4. HULULAIS:2X55MW (Bengkulu)
5. ULUBELU: Unit-4: 55MW (Lampung)
6. KARAHA BODAS: 30MW (West Java)
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY
115115
145
145
145
110
110
115115
170
285
285
285
200 235
235
235
235
235
255255
275
275
315
315
2267
430
2025
55
165
80
340
50
220
12
170
2024
1882
140
55
11040
340
50
2022
1377
110
255
50
220
12
220
12
170
2023
1632
5555
110
255
50
220
12
170
170
2021
1112
55
140
30
220
12
170
2020
1037
5560
140
30
220
12
150
2019
922
55
11030
220
12
150
2018
792
5530
220
12130
2017
677
3055
220
12125
2016
597
3055
165
12100
2015
437
11012
80
2014
402
11012
80
KMJ 5 (35 MW)
UBL 3 (55MW)LHD 5 (20 MW)KRH 1 (30 MW)LMB 1 (55 MW)
UBL 4 (55MW)
LHD 6 (20 MW)
LHD sc (5 MW)
HLS 1 (55MW)
LMB 2 (55 MW)
LHD sc (5 MW)
SPN 1 (55 MW)HLS 2 (55 MW)LHD 7 (20 MW)
KMJ ext A1 (20 MW)LMB sc (5 MW)
HLS ext A1 (30 MW)SPN sc (5 MW)SLA 1 (55 MW)
KMJ ext B1 (20 MW)LMB 3 (55 MW)KRH 2 (20 MW)HLS 3 (55 MW)
HLS ext A2 (30 MW)HLS ext B1 (10 MW)
Binary/DF HLS (20 MW)SLA 2 (55 MW)
Projection of Installed Capacity of PGE 2015-2025
1 MW
19.015
BOEPD
47,30BOEPD
20.670
BOEPD
28.238
BOEPD
43.611
BOEPD32.02
2BOEP
D
37.462
BOEPD
89.019
BOEPD
77.194
BOEPD
65.132
BOEPD
52.598
BOEPD
107.229BOEPD
49.050BOEP
D
LMB 4 (55 MW)LMB ext A1 (30
MW)LMB ext A2 (30
MW)SPN ext A1 (30 MW)
GDP 1 (55 MW)New WKP (55 MW)
KMJ ext A2 (20MW)KMJ ext B2 (20MW)
HLS 4 (55 MW)HLS ext A3 (30
MW)KTB1&2 (40 MW)
New WKP (85 MW)
KTB 3&4 (40 MW)SLA 3 (55 MW)
New WKP (290 MW)
LHD 8 (20 MW)SPN 2 (55 MW)
New WKP
Gede Pangrango
Seulawah
Kotamobagu
Kerinci (Sungaipenuh)
Hululais & Tambang Sawah
Karaha
Lumutbalai & Marga Bayur
Ulubelu & Way Panas
Sibayak & Sinabung
Lahendong & Tompaso
Kamojang & Ciharus
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY5
The Competitive Advantage of PGE
Exploration Team
- Most of the surveys run by PGE’s GGG Team
in order to get good data acquisition
- Modelling sometimes we ask other experts as
a second opinion
- Water and gas analysis is in house analysis
with cross check data in other labs.
- All Interpretations, exploration strategy and
development wells prepared by the GGG team
of PGE
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Exploration Scope
Geology
Geochemistry
Geophysics
Surveys Drilling
Exploration wells: 3-5 clusters??
- Strategy and design
- Wells to drill depend on the area
- Water supply
Challenge
- Prospect location: high/rugged terrain, accessibility
- Land status
- Surface thermal signature ex. Ubl
- High Risk drilling: HD1945 m, deep drilling 3200m depth..
- Social problem: approach to society and local government
- Economic of scale : how big to develop resources & price
- Electricity demand
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Security of Steam Supply
Infrastructure
Road, WPS, Wellpad
Time from Green Field to Drilling Exploration (Bukit Daun model d fastest)
Exploration
Survey Geology,
Geochemistry,
Geophysics
1 thn
Exploration
DrillingExploration wells: 2 wells
Target probable zone-proven steam
(50% success ratio)
Development
Drilling Reservoir Model
Target 60%-80% drilling success
9 + 5 development/injection wells
For 55MW
GPP
construction
1-2 thn
2-3 thn
2 thn
Accessibility
30 thn
Equity: 100%
Debt : 0%
Equity: 30%
Debt : 70%
6 t
hn
Time +/- Stage Activity FinanceH
igh
Lo
w
Equity: 100%
Debt : 0%
Equity: 100%
Debt : 0%
Equity: 100%
Debt : 0%
1 thn
Legal:Ukl-Upl,SIPA,IPPKH etc
RIS
K
Modified jbic
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Prospect Technical Evaluation
Geology, Geophysic &
Geochemistry Study
- Lidar & aerial photo
- Geology & alteration
mapping
- (volcanostratigraphy,
- structural geology,
- age dating)
- Geochemistry surface
manifestation
(water/gas/isotope/soil) survey
- Gravity, Magnetic,
Geoelectrical,Magnetotelluric
, Micro Earthquake survey
Geothermal Geological Setting
- Volcanic,intrusion
- Caldera, Graben
- Fault system
Geothermal System
- High/medium / low
Enthalpy
- Liquid/2 phase/vapour
dominated
Regional Data
Management
Regional information
Country / Domestic &
industry environment
• Social and political situation
• Country / Domestic risk
• Geothermal legislation
• Electricity Demand
• Competitors activity
• Energy Substitution Challenges
• Land Use / Permit
Project economics
• Infrastructure
• Economic indicators
• Commercial types
• Taxes
• Pricing System
• Fiscal terms
Regional Geology
• Literature/report
• Reconnaissance survey
• Tectonic Setting &
• Volcanism
Geothermal Model
- Heat source
- Reservoir geometry & fluid
- Cap Rock
- Recharge
- Permeability (detail
structural map)
- Hydrology (upflow &
outflow)
- System risk
▪ Resource assessment
▪ Risk analysis
▪ Technical/funnel review
Geothermal Setting
Resource
Preliminary Study
Project
Prospectous
Exploration
Drilling
Geothermal Model
Tentative
Model
GGGR
Evaluation
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
TENTATIVE MODEL
PROPOSED
EXPL.DRILLING
SURVEY TARGET
Geological Model
- Structure permeability
target/fracture density
- Volcanic Rx.thickness
- Age
- Heat source
- Volcanic facies
Hydrology Model
- Reservoir Temp.
- Up flow/out flow
Geophysical Model
- Top reservoir
- Low resistivity zone
- Boundary,Thickness
GEOSCIENTIFIC SURVEY
Modelling GGG Prospect
-Geology:
-Geological map
-Alteration system
-Lidar structure map
-Volcanostratigraphy
-Geochemistry:
-Water, steam, isotope
-Mixing/dilution model
-Fluid type etc
-Geophysics:
-MT-TDEM,
-Micro earth quake,
-Gravity, magnetic
SCOPE AND SURVEY TARGET in PROSPECT EVALUATION
DG
“Exploration study proved by the drilling shows the capability of the GGG team”
-Hg CO2
-Gradient holes
-Petrex finger print
-Schlumberger
-SP etc..
Classified the methodology of the GGG survey which is
appropriate to the volcanic geothermal system or
geological circumstances of the prospect.?
DG
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Drilling is the critical work to prove all the GGG concepts and the key to
the company growth.
Some requirements to the drilling team to make a success drilling:
- Well trajectory (vertical or directional well, kop, HD, high angle
in directional well, deep drilling) stuck pipe
- Well design (casing design) deep target, hazard
- Mud parameters/air drilling formation damage
- Cementing job avoid down flow from shallow reservoir
EXPLORATION DRILLING
WELL INTEGRITY
For long term operation
Prepare Plan A and Plan B exploratorion wells
Geothermal
KAMOJANG
- Volcanic Rock (Lava+Pyro)
-Caldera Control
- Block Faulting
- Horizontal Permeability ?!
LAHENDONG+
TOMPASO
-Volcanic Rock
(Lava+pyro)
- Caldera Control
-Faulting
SIBAYAK
-Volcanic Rock
(lava+pyro)
- Caldera Control
-Faulting
EXPLORATION WELL
Vertical Well : 0% - 28%
Deviated Well : 63% - 83%
ULUBELU
-Volcanic Rock
(lava+pyro)
- Caldera Control
- Block Faulting
KERINCI
-Volcanic Rock
(Lava+pyro)
- Caldera Control
-Faulting
LUMUTBALAI
-Volcanic Rock
(Lava+pyro)
- Caldera Control
- Block Faulting
KARAHA
-Strato volcano
-Volcanic Rock
(Lava+pyro)
-Faulting
HULULAIS
-Volcanic Rock
(Lava+pyro)
- Caldera Control
- fault
BUKIT DAUN
- Strato volcano
-Volcanic Rock
(Lava+pyro)
- Graben/fault
“Big hole completion and Diverted well”
Exploration/Development
Development
KOTAMOBAGU
-Strato volcano
-Volcanic Rock
Faulting
SUCCESS RATIO
IN VERTICAL AND DEVIATED WELLS(Data Source: 246 wells from 10 Geothermal Fields)
91
37+13
509 10
27 11 5 12
DEVELOPMENT WELL
Vertical Well : 11% - 47%
Deviated Well : 67% - 93%
Success Ratio in in each field is much success in Deviated
well in big hole completion
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Lineament/fractures in exploration YYY
R
R
PT
D
D
T: Tension fracture
R&R’: Riedel fracture
S: Cleavage
P: Skempton fractures
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
T: Tension fracture
R&R’: Riedel fracture
S: Cleavage
P: Skempton fractures
Fracture Implication at the Shear Zone
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
69500010125000
10126000
10127000
10128000
10129000
10130000
10131000
10132000
10133000
10134000
10135000
No
rth
(m
)
696000 697000 698000 699000 700000 701000 702000 703000 704000 705000 706000 707000
East (m)
G.Riendengan
Bukit Kasih
(Kwh.Masam)
Tompaso
Tolok
Talikuran
Kinali
Kawangkoan
Tonsewer
Tumaratas
Taratak
Tember
Tempang
Wowok
Toraget
Sumarayar
Langowan
Paso
Pulutan
Cl water
HCO3 waterHCO3 water
SO4 water SO4-Cl water
Lake
Tondano
WATER TYPE OF THERMAL MANIFESTATIONS
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Deep Non
Artesian Reservoir
T.res.:260-2800C
Cl:300-400 ppm Deep Artesian
Reservoir
T.res.:300-3400C
Cl:100-400 ppm
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Penampang Magneto Telluric 2D terhadap Arah Sumur LHD-23
Good-Excellent data acquisition
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Alteration Model of Lahendong Area
Showing North-South Section
c/HP/YS/CDM-Peluang-
Tantangan/PptGeothermal
Conventional : Single event determination (SED)Advanced : Joint hypocenter determination (JHD)
Aditya wgc 2015
Drilling target
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY22
No one exploration method can be used to define the well
locations but those scientific approaches should be matched to
the geological concept.
GGG team is the competitive advantage of the company to take the
responsibility in the drilling risk and company growth.
Conclusion