Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Exploiting Natural Processes to Effectively Remediate Acidified Coastal Environments
ARC Linkage Project LP110100480
Annual Progress Report for 2011
Richard Collins, Yliane Yvanes-Giuliani and Jackie Stroud
April 2012
DOCUMENT STATUS RECORD
Project Title: Exploiting Natural Processes to Effectively Remediate Acidified Coastal Environments
Client: Tweed Shire Council, Sebastien Garcia-Cuenca Andrew Tickle and Robert Quirk, NSW Cane Growers Association Rick Beattie, NSW Sugar Milling Co-operative
Document Title: Exploiting Natural Processes to Effectively Remediate Acidified Coastal Environments. ARC Linkage Project LP110100480. Annual Progress Report for 2011
Document Number: 2012/1 File Name: LP110100480 APR for 2011
Issue No.
Date of Issue Description Signatures Authors Checked Approved
1 2nd April 2012 Annual Progress Report
RC RC RC
Notes
Disclaimer:
1. The Water Research Centre has taken all reasonable steps to ensure that the information contained within this report is accurate at the time of production. In some cases, we have relied upon the information supplied by the client.
2. This report has been prepared in accordance with good professional practice. No other warranty expressed or implied is made as to the professional advice given in this report.
3. The Water Research Centre maintains no responsibility for the misrepresentation of results due to incorrect usage of the information contained within this report.
4. This report should remain together and be read as a whole. 5. This report has been prepared solely for the benefit of the client(s) listed above. No liability is accepted by the
Water Research Centre with respect to the use of this report by third parties without prior written approval.
Contact Details: UNSW Water Research Centre School of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of New South Wales Physical: Building H22, Vallentine Annexe Botany Street Gate 11 Kensington. Postal: UNSW, Sydney, 2052 Telephone: (02) 9385 5017 Fax: (02) 9313 8624
Name: Richard Collins Email: [email protected]
© Water Research Centre
Commercial-in-confidence 3
TableofContents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 4
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................ 5
UNSW PROJECT PERSONNEL ..................................................................................................................................... 7
PROJECT METHODS ................................................................................................................................................ 7
RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8
BLACKS DRAIN ........................................................................................................................................................... 8
CHRISTIES CK ........................................................................................................................................................... 13
ALUMINIUM SOLUBILITY IN ASS USED FOR SUGAR CANE CULTIVATION ................................................................... 15
CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 16
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 17
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................... 17
Commercial-in-confidence 4
ExecutiveSummary
This report details the annual progress of the Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage project
LP110100480 ‘Exploiting Natural Processes to Effectively Remediate Acidified Coastal Environments’
which commenced in 2011 with industry partners the Tweed Shire Council, NSW Cane Growers
Association and NSW Sugar Milling Co‐operative. The main aims of the project are to undertake:
1) Research which identifies acid sulfate soil (ASS) hotspots within 3 catchments in the Tweed Shire
and then the most suitable remediation strategies to reduce ASS discharge on a catchment scale;
2) On‐ground remedial works identified in (1) above; and
3) Field measurements to determine the efficacy of the remedial works in reducing the discharge of
problematic contaminants (particularly iron and aluminium) from the 3 catchments.
The major field research undertakings in 2011 focused on two catchments, namely Blacks Drain and
Christies Ck. In the former catchment, research was aimed at determining how effective remedial works
conducted in 2009 have been in reducing the discharge of iron and aluminium from the upper catchment
area. In the latter catchment, previous research was utilised with limited further sampling to identify
problematic ASS areas and potential techniques to improve water quality from this catchment. Some of
the key findings are summarised in point form below:
Examination of comparable (i.e. wet season) individual rainfall events prior to and after the
remediation was carried out at Blacks Drain in 2009 indicates that the discharge of iron from this
catchment has decreased by approximately 20‐fold. Data interpretation is continuing to identify the
processes responsible for such a dramatic response to remediation;
Based on a number of previous field studies, a hydraulically isolated sugar cane block in the
downstream portion of Christies Ck was selected as an area of priority for remediation. Remedial
works proposed for this area included a) optimisation of the drain pumping regime discharging into
Christies Ck, and b) drain shallowing of the 2 major drains at least to the invert of the field drains.
Actual remedial works undertaken in August/September 2011 included limited drain shallowing in
one of the major drains, improvements to the drain batters and a liming trial at 1 and 2
tonne(s)/acre (to increase soil pH). Wet weather has so far precluded field measurements, post‐
remediation, at this site.
Laboratory studies on ASS, all of which are used for sugar cane cultivation, taken from the
catchments of Blacks Drain, McLeods Ck and Christies Ck have shown that aluminium solubility
actually increases above pH 5 in ASS that contain high % concentrations of organic carbon (i.e. the
organic soil surface horizon). Based on these results, it is recommended that current best
management practices used in the NSW Sugar Industry for ASS in regards to optimal pH be re‐
evaluated when considering environmental impact.
This project was awarded funding for a three year period and similar annual progress reports will be
issued soon after the conclusion of 2012 and 2013.
Commercial‐in‐confidence 5
Introduction
Background
In November 2010 it was announced by the Australian Research Council (ARC) that the Linkage project
LP110100480 ‘Exploiting Natural Processes to Effectively Remediate Acidified Coastal Environments’ was
awarded funding for 3 years for collaborative research between the University of New South Wales
(UNSW), the Tweed Shire Council, NSW Cane Growers Association and NSW Sugar Milling Co‐operative.
The project commenced in January 2011 and the first meeting between stakeholders was held on 28th
January 2011 in the Buchannan Room at the Council Depot. The results outlined in this report were
presented to all stakeholders on the 27th March 2012 at the first annual meeting of the project which
was also held at the Council Depot.
For reference, the main aims of this ARC Linkage project are reiterated below:
1) Undertake research which identifies acid sulfate soil (ASS) hotspots within 3 catchments in the
Tweed Shire and then the most suitable remediation strategies to reduce ASS discharge on a
catchment scale;
2) Conduct on‐ground remedial works identified in (1) above; and
3) Obtain field measurements to determine the efficacy of the remedial works in reducing the
discharge of problematic contaminants (particularly iron and aluminium) from the 3 catchments.
The 3 catchments in the Tweed Shire identified as acid sulfate ‘hotspots’ to be investigated were in
various stages of remediation prior to the commencement of this project (Figure 1).
Blacks Drain, a highly‐modified tributary of the Tweed River, was remediated in 2009/2010 as an
outcome of the research findings from a previous ARC Linkage project LP0455697 (Collins et al. 2009).
Major remediation work was conducted by the Tweed Shire Council in collaboration with landholders Jim
and Les Dickinson within the pasture section (Figure 1) of the catchment (drain infilling, drain widening
and shallowing, drain bank revegetation, acid scald capping and liming, stock exclusion, and the
construction of packed‐bed limestone channels) whilst only minor adjustments to the downstream
sugarcane section were made on the Stainlay’s property (drain bank revegetation). We have significant
pre‐remediation data on this catchment from research activities conducted in LP0455697.
Christies Creek is a coastal catchment dominated by sugar cane cultivation and pasture in the upper
catchment and native forest and residential areas in the lower catchment. Over the last 3 years this
catchment has come to the attention of the Tweed Shire Council owing to the occurrence of fish kills,
heavy iron flocs and, more recently, arsenic concentrations exceeding ANZECC (2000) water quality
guidelines (Kinsela et al. 2009a). The source of the arsenic and indeed other contaminants identified in
the catchment (iron and aluminium) is the underlying ASS. No remediation work at Christies Ck had been
carried out prior to 2011, although a limited‐scale monitoring program was established in this catchment
in 2009/2010 with the collaboration of landholders Ross Hardy, Ray Dooley, Craig King and Mr and Mrs
Colin Love.
Commercial‐in‐confidence 6
Figure 1: Aerial view of the three catchments in northern NSW to be investigated in this project.
Previous remedial work undertaken in Blacks Drain and Clothiers Ck/Reserve Ck are detailed. Catchment
boundaries are denoted by the dot‐dash lines.
Cudgen Lake (Clothiers & Reserve Cks) is the coastal catchment immediately south of the Tweed River
which has been the subject of previous research and remediation studies (e.g. LP0219475 & NSW
Environmental Trust ASS Hot Spot Remediation Program 2000‐2004). Cudgen Lake has been subjected
to poor water quality over many years, due to the construction of an adjacent golf course and residential
development that was abandoned before its completion. This resulted in major fish kills in 1991 and
1998, and an overall degradation of aquatic life. Research from LP0219475 has shown that the problem
is mainly due to rain‐induced discharges from oxidising ASS in the catchment (Macdonald et al. 2004).
The Hot Spot Remediation Program resulted in approximately 6 km of drains being filled (Figure 1) and
almost 11,000 m2 of severely degraded ‘acid scald’ being remediated. Despite these measures, large fish
kills continue to occur within Cudgen Lake and adjoining waterways (Perkins 2010).
The ultimate objective of this project is to sustainably engineer problematic agricultural acid sulfate soils
on the east coast of Australia into areas that are both environmentally benign and economically
profitable.
1 0 km
R ‐‐ Residential F ‐‐ Forest
Pacific Ocean
P
P F
F
R
R
R
C ‐‐ Cane P ‐‐ Pasture
C
C
P
Christies Creek Catchment
1 0 km
Clothiers & Reserve Creek Floodplain
Clothiers Ck
Modified or in‐filled drain
Cudgen Lake
Reserve Ck
P
P P
P
Main drain shallowed & widened
Drains in‐filled
Downstream export to Tweed River
10
km
0.50
km
Tweed River
Blacks Drain Catchment
P P
P
C
C
Commercial‐in‐confidence 7
UNSWProjectPersonnel
During 2011, Miss Yliane Yvanes‐Giuliani (March) and Dr Jackie Stroud (August) were recruited to the
project to undertake, respectively, PhD studies and post‐doctoral research in the research areas specified
in the Introduction. Both positions are fully‐funded by the project.
Dr Jackie Stroud has a PhD in soil science from Lancaster University, UK and was working at Rothamsted
Research prior to commencing working on the project in August 2011. She has a strong research
background in trace element mobility and bioavailability in soils.
Miss Yliane Yvanes‐Giuliani obtained her Honours degree in environmental science from the University of
Plymouth, UK and started her PhD at UNSW in March 2011. She is undertaking her PhD studies into
aluminium geochemistry in ASS as a co‐tutelle program between UNSW and the University Aix‐
Marseilles, France. She also obtained an Australian Nuclear Science and Engineering top‐up scholarship
in July 2011 which will facilitate her use of certain scientific instruments at the Australian Nuclear Science
and Technology Organisation (ANSTO).
Dr Richard Collins was responsible for the day‐to‐day management of the previous ARC Linkage project
(LP0455697) with the Tweed Shire Council and NSW Cane Growers Association and has developed a
strong rapport with both Council staff and local landholders. He leads this research project and
contributes to both laboratory and field research activities of Jackie and Yliane. His role (at 0.2 Full Time
Equivalent) in the project is not remunerated from project funding.
ProjectMethods
During 2011, continuous water quality monitoring (i.e. pH, redox, dissolved oxygen, conductivity and
water temperature) was undertaken in all 3 catchments. As significant metal contaminant discharge
from ASS catchments has been linked to rainfall events, automatic water samplers were also deployed
along Blacks Drain in October and November after two rainfall events that exceeded >100 mm/day.
These auto‐samplers collected water samples at approximately 3 hr intervals for periods up to 6 days
after rainfall with pH and redox measurements being conducted in the field. All water samples were
filtered (0.22 µm) and subsequently acidified (70% HNO3) in the field. They were stored in the dark until
they could be refrigerated and then transported to UNSW for analysis. Elemental analyses were
performed by Inductively Coupled Plasma (Optical Emission Spectrometry or Mass Spectrometry) at
UNSW. Appropriate quality controls included analysis of blanks, frequent recalibration and the recovery
of spiked blanks, ensuring meaningful data were extracted.
Samples from the auto‐samplers were complemented by water velocity measurements made during
water sample collection / deployment. The measurements of water velocity (Vt) were made using a
Pygmy Ott meter, which when combined with drain dimensions (At) can be used to calculate drain
discharge (Qt), viz. Equation 1. Furthermore, when the contaminant concentration (Ct) is known, an
elemental export (or flux, Ft) can be extrapolated from the data according to Equation 2.
Qt = Vt × At [1]
Ft = Qt × Ct [2]
Commercial‐in‐confidence 8
In addition, transects across Blacks Drain were established that facilitated continuous measurements of
groundwater and drainwater levels (Odyssey capacitance probes) and spot sampling of groundwater
samples for elemental analyses. These data are still being compiled and interpreted and are not
reported here.
A campaign was also undertaken in April to collect soil samples from the three catchments. As access to
Clothiers and Reserve Ck was restricted at this time, samples from McLeods Ck were obtained in lieu.
These samples were used to examine the geochemistry of aluminium in ASS.
Results
BlacksDrain
Research undertaken at Blacks Drain in the ARC Linkage project LP0455697 (2005‐2008) indicated that
the upper catchment area, i.e. beyond the area used for sugar cane cultivation, contributed the most to
contaminant discharge (Collins et al. 2009a). This was evidenced by continuous acidic pH readings of
drainwater at the upper catchment site indicated in Figure 2 and also comparable or larger quantities of
iron (Fe) exported from this site, than that from other downstream sites, during a wet season rainfall
event monitored in January 2008 (Figure 3). This rainfall event is designated a ‘wet‐season’ event as we
have noted that Fe is typically of higher concentrations in drainage waters during the summer/autumn
wet season whereas aluminium (Al) is the major acid‐generating contaminant of concern during
winter/spring dry season rainfall events (Collins et al. 2009a).
Continuous drainwater monitoring after remediation has indicated an improvement in water quality at
the site designated ‘upper catchment’ in Figure 2 in that pH was consistently higher during 2010 than
when compared to 2007 (Figure 4). Due to a number of technical and maintenance issues with the water
quality measurement stations, only limited data was collected in 2011. However, the results are largely
in line with that obtained in 2010 (data not shown). If the average pH values are compared between the
two years a value of pH 4.8 is obtained in 2010, which is significantly higher than the pH 3.7 obtained
during 2007.
In 2011 drainwater and groundwater samples were also collected during two rainfall events so as to
compare the quantity of iron and aluminium discharged from the upper catchment area before and after
remediation. The results between 2008 and 2011 are compared in Figure 5. It is immediately obvious
from Figure 5 that there is a dramatic decrease in the quantity of iron being exported from the pasture
site during the rainfall event measured in November 2011 (aluminium concentrations in the drainwaters
were negligible during both rainfall events). To be able to compare these values on a somewhat
normalised basis, the total quantity of iron exported during the two events was calculated based on the
total volume of water exported during the measurement frame (i.e. 9 days in 2008 and 6 days in 2011).
These calculations indicated that prior to remediation 55 tonnes of iron were exported per gigalitre from
this area whereas it was only 2.5 tonnes of iron per gigalitre during the 2011 event. Despite some of the
uncertainties inherent in these types of calculations, such a difference would suggest that the remedial
work carried out in late 2009 has made a dramatic improvement to the quality of water draining from
the site in Blacks Drain.
Commercial‐in‐confidence 9
Figure 2: (Upper) Aerial photograph of the Black’s Drain catchment (catchment boundary shown in red).
Sites on Black’s Drain where the continuous water quality monitoring stations were located in 2007 have
been circled and are colour designated as such in the graph (Lower) which represents hourly pH (and
daily rainfall) measurements during 2007. The black lines on the aerial photograph represent the major
drainage lines of the catchment.
TVW
Upper Catchment
Weather Station
Airport
TVW
Upper Catchment
Weather Station
Airport
Commercial‐in‐confidence 10
Figure 3: (Upper) Aerial photograph of the Black’s Drain catchment (catchment boundary shown in red).
Sites on Black’s Drain where drainwater samples were collected every 3 hours over a 9 day period in
January 2008 (after a rainfall event) have been circled and are colour designated as such in the graph
(Lower) which represents the quantity of iron (Fe) exported on an hourly basis.
Further rainfall
Pasture
Commercial‐in‐confidence 11
Figure 4: Comparison of drainwater pH, with associated daily rainfall, at the upper catchment site in
Blacks Drain designated in Figure 2. The data shown for 2007 is the same as that shown in Figure 2.
Commercial‐in‐confidence 12
Figure 5: Comparison of the quantity of (dissolved) iron exported from Blacks Drain, after a rainfall event,
at the drainwater pasture site indicated in Figure 3 in 2008 (9 days of measurements) and 2011 (6 days of
measurements). Note the dramatic decrease in the load of Fe exported (kg/hr) during 2011.
Commercial‐in‐confidence 13
ChristiesCk
Based on a number of studies undertaken within the Christies Ck catchment (e.g. Kinsela et al. 2009b), it
was identified that a hydrologically isolated cane farm (noted as site 6 in Figure 6) was a major
contributor of Al to the lower reaches of Christies Creek (Table 1), with internal drainage networks
(Figure 7) and pumping regimes identified as being below best‐management‐practices.
Figure 6: Location of Christies Creek major drainage lines and the subcatchments (designated as sites on
the Figure) monitored for the export of iron and aluminium (Kinsela and Collins, 2011).
Table 1: Export of aluminium from Christies Creek across a 6‐month sampling period (Kinsela et al. 2009b). The cane farm is site 6 and the Christies Ck data is a site just upstream from site 6.
Scenario Analyte Representation within 6‐month study (days)1
Outflow volume (L) in
study2
Analyte concentration
(mg/L)
6‐monthly export total
(kg)
Christies Creek Baseline Flow
Al 147 7.62 × 109 0.05 381
Christies Creek Rain Event Flow
Al 34 1.44 × 1010 0.2 2 880
Cane farm Baseline Flow
Al 147 1.32 × 108 3 395
Cane farm Rain Event Flow
Al 34 2.64 × 108 15 3960
CC South.
Site 6.
Site 3.Site 2.
Site 1.
Reserve Ck.
Site 4.
Site 5.
Commercial‐in‐confidence 14
Figure 7: Photos of one of the major drains within site 6 (Kinsela and Collins, 2011).
During an on‐site meeting in August 2011 with Sebastian Garcia‐Cuenca, Richard Collins, Ross Hardy and
Robert Quirk, it was agreed that the following suitable remediation work at Site 6 would be undertaken
(refer to Figure 8):
‐ Cap and lime (2 tonnes/acre) the western headland of the north‐south drain to reduce sub‐
surface drainage from the cane block into the drain;
‐ Drain shallowing of the major east‐west and north‐south running drains with additional liming at
5 tonnes/acre, and;
‐ Trail the of liming cane blocks and field drains at 1 or 2 tonnes/acre.
These on‐ground works either comply with the NSW Sugar Industry’s best management practices or
were suggested in Kinsela and Collins (2011). Shallowing of the major east‐west and north‐south drains
should reduce the cyclical oxidation and acidification of exposed sulfidic sediments within the drains and,
as such, the generation of aluminium. These changes should, therefore, result in the decreased discharge
of aluminium to downstream environments, whilst not causing water‐logging to the sugarcane crop. It is
suggested that the western most point of the east‐west drain should be shallowed to the invert of the
field drains with a fall of approximately 0.5 m to the junction with the north‐south drain. It is, therefore,
expected that the depth of the north‐south drain will not greatly exceed the maximum depth of the east‐
west drain. Recognising that this drainage system may still allow groundwater transport to the major
drains (i.e. via field drains), the liming of cane blocks was trialled so that sub‐surface pH be raised to at
least pH 4.
In September/October 2011 the majority of these works were carried out, however, it should be noted
that drain shallowing of the major east‐west and north‐south running drains was restricted to only a
Commercial‐in‐confidence 15
portion of the western end of the major east‐west drain. It is recommended that the full‐suite of
remedial works be undertaken to completion at the site.
Soil sampling and monitoring of the site since the works have been undertaken has so far been limited
due to wet weather. As such, these studies will continue into 2012.
Figure 8: Locations of agreed on‐ground works and liming rates at site 6 (as at 5th August 2011).
AluminiumsolubilityinASSusedforsugarcanecultivation
In previous studies we have observed, surprisingly, that soluble Al concentrations in organic surface soil
horizons from acid sulfate soils in the Tweed Shire used for sugar cane cultivation increase above pH 5
(Collins et al. 2009b). This result is surprising because it would normally be expected that soluble Al
concentrations decrease due to the metal’s propensity to precipitate with increasing pH values.
However, analyses of a large range of organic surface soils collected in 2011 across the Tweed Shire have
confirmed these previous results (Figure 9).
While we are still investigating the nature of this phenomenon, we currently hypothesise that natural
organic matter becomes more soluble as pH increases and that this soluble organic matter can form
soluble complexes with Al – hence increasing soluble Al concentrations. Nevertheless, it is clear from
Blocks & field drains limed at 1t/ acre Blocks & field drains limed at 2t/ acre E/ W drain shallowed and limed at 5t/ acre N/ S drain shallowed and limed at 5t/acre
Commercial‐in‐confidence 16
these results that increasing the pH (e.g. via liming) of these acid sulfate soils above pH 5.5 will actually
lead to an increase in the discharge of Al from these sites. In light of these findings, it is suggested that
current best management practices in regards to both optimum soil pH and discharge waters (for
environmental benefits) be revisited in the near future.
Figure 9: Soluble aluminium concentrations in soils collected from around the Tweed Shire that are used
for sugar cane cultivation. Concentrations were determined on 1:5 soil:solution extractions in Millipore
(ultra‐pure) water and have been normalised in the graph to a soil:solution ratio of 1:1
Conclusions
Whilst still in the early stages of the project, significant progress has been made towards the project’s
objectives and a number of promising findings have been obtained in regards to the efficacy of the
remediation work carried out at Blacks Drain in 2009. More specifically, the data obtained in 2011 has
shown that the discharge of iron from Blacks Drain has decreased by approximately 20‐fold during
comparable rainfall events. Data interpretation is continuing to identify the processes responsible for
such a dramatic response to remediation.
Remedial work has been undertaken at a site within the Christies Ck catchment with a view to
minimising aluminium discharge in drainwaters. Wet weather has so far precluded field measurements,
post‐remediation, at this site to assess any changes induced by the on‐ground works. These studies are
continuing in 2012.
Commercial‐in‐confidence 17
Laboratory studies on organic soil surface horizons taken from three catchments in the Tweed Shire
have shown that in these types of soils aluminium solubility actually increases above pH 5.5. While we
have initially speculated that this results from the formation of soluble aluminium‐natural organic
matter complexes, these results nonetheless indicate that the optimal soil pH to minimise aluminium
discharge is pH 4.5 – 5. As such, current best management practices in regards to the pH of acid sulfate
soils and discharge waters requires further consideration when assessing environmental impact.
Acknowledgements
The assistance of Sebastien Garcia‐Cuenca (Tweed Shire Council) and the landowners who have also
assisted in the work detailed in this report and who have also allowed us to conduct environmental
monitoring on their properties is gratefully acknowledged. This includes special thanks to Jim and Les
Dickinson, Nicola Stainlay, Robert Quirk, Ross Hardy, Harry Boyd and Ian and Rhonda Taggett.
References
ANZECC (2000). Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Volume 2:
Aquatic Ecosystems. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council,
Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, Australia.
Collins R, A Jones, MD Melville and TD Waite (2009a). Suggested remedial works for the Black’s Drain
catchment of the Tweed River floodplain. Findings from the ARC Linkage Project LP0455697 (2005
to 2008). Report 2008/17, version 1, Centre for Water and Waste Technology, The University of
New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. p. 16.
Collins RN, D Fink, C Mifsud, TE Payne and TD Waite (2009b) The use of 26Al Accelerator Mass
Spectrometry to investigate aluminium chemistry in coastal lowland acid sulfate soils. Proceedings
of 16th AINSE Conference on Nuclear and Complementary Techniques of Analysis, Lucas Heights,
Australia, November 2009. http://www.ainse.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/48685/NCTA‐
15_Collins‐revised1.pdf.
Kinsela A and R Collins (2011). Suggested remedial works for Christies Creek to reduce the discharge of
aluminium and iron from acid sulfate soils. Final Report, version 2. UNSW Water Research Centre
publication 2011/10, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. p.25
Kinsela A, R Collins and TD Waite (2009a). Sources, concentrations and bioavailability of arsenic in
sediments: Christies Creek, north east NSW. UNSW Water Research Centre publication 2009/15,
The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. p.27.
Kinsela A, Waite D, Collins R (2009b). Stream and groundwater quality relating to acid sulfate soils
discharge: Christies Creek, north east NSW. Final Report. UNSW Water Research Centre
publication 2009/23, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. p.31.
Macdonald BCT, J Smith, AF Keene, M Tunks, A Kinsela and I White (2004). Impacts of runoff from
sulfuric soils on sediment chemistry in an estuarine lake. Science of the Total Environment
329:115‐130.
Perkins J (2010). Fish kill occurs in Cudgen Creek. Tweed Daily News (12th April 2010).