Upload
umika
View
35
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
CERN, Space charge 2013 17 th April 2013. EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC. E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team. CONTENTS. The approach : FiDeL , LSA, Wise The gold mine: LHC magnets production data Details of modeling and operation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
E. Todesco
EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC
E. TodescoCERN, Geneva Switzerland
Thanks to the FiDeL team
CERN, Space charge 201317th April 2013
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 2
CONTENTS
The approach: FiDeL, LSA, Wise
The gold mine: LHC magnets production data
Details of modeling and operation
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 3
FIDEL AND WISE
FiDeL (Field Description of the LHC)is the conversion of fields/gradients to currentsplus the recipe to precycle magnets to ensure reproducibility and correct modeling
It consists ofA set of equations describing the relation field(current)
Done for the main component + multipolesSo it also models imperfections and field errors
These equations have componentsGeometric (linear)Saturation (high fields)Magnetization both of iron and of conductor (low fields)
CurrentsField & Gradient
s
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 4
FIDEL AND WISE
FiDeL (Field Description of the LHC)Each component depends on several parametersThe functional form of each component is specified in [N. Sammut, L. Bottura, J. Micalef et al. Phys. Rev. STAB 012402 (2006)]In some cases relies on a physical model, in others it is a nonlinear fit
Saturation is modeled through a double erf functionMagnetization relies on the known fits of the critical current
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 5
FIDEL AND WISE
First step (FiDeL) – magnet expertsFit the magnetic measurements with the FiDeL parametrizationExtract the fit parametersConstruct a DB with these parameters magnet by magnetAssociate to each parameter uncertainties (recent development [P. Hagen, P. Ferracin] )
The result is the summa of the knoweldge on our magnets
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 6
FIDEL AND WISE
Second step: export towards CCC – OP groupThis is the need of the control room:
Currents to steer the circuits of the main magnetsCurrents to steer the circuits of the correctors
The control room system (LSA) has the FiDeL parametrization independetely implementedThe DB is reduced from magnet to magnet to circuit to circuit
This is the LSA DB used to steer the accelerator according to the optic filesTrims are also based on FiDeL parametrization (tune, chroma, …)
Obviously, a lot of information is not used (magnet by magnet, high order multipoles for which we have not correctors …)
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 7
FIDEL AND WISE
Third step: export towards modeling – ABP groupWISE: Windows Interface for Sequence of Elements [P. Hagen]
Builds the best input for MAD or tracking codes based on our knowledge of the magnetsIt also relies on the information about alignement and geometryIt can associate uncertainties to each component to account for the measurements errors or for missing information
FiDeL parameters, uncertainties
and equations
Sequence of magnetsGeometry
WISE
MAD input file
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 8
CONTENTS
The approach: FiDeL, LSA, Wise
The gold mine: LHC magnets production data
Detail of modeling
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 9
THE GOLD MINE
Magnetic measurements are the key pointRoom temperature: providing geometric
100% of magnets measured – full knowledgeDone at the industries, in two different stages (redundancy)
Operational conditions (20% dipoles, 10% quadrupoles, 100% triplet)
Done at CERN or in US (triplet)Phenomenology of superconducting magnets radically different from resistive
Magnetization and dynamic effects are the most challengingSaturation proves to be easier and with less variation from magnet to magnet
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 10
THE GOLD MINE
Example: measurements of the triplet
0.00320
0.00325
0.00330
0.00335
0.00340
0.00345
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
TF (T
m /
A)
Current (A)
MQXA - Integral
MQXA - DCloop
MQXA19
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
0 5000 10000
TF (U
nits
)
Current (A)
MQXB - integral (all)
MQXB02 - DCloop
Roxie model
MQXB02
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 11
CONTENTS
The approach: FiDeL, LSA, Wise
The gold mine: LHC magnets production data
Detail of modeling and operation
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 12
DETAILS OF MODELING
Each model is developed with a level of detail appropriate for its relevance in the LHC
We do not model everything for every magnet …Dipoles and quadrupoles
Geometric is estimated magnet by magnetPersistent and saturation component are estimated family by family (i.e. one for each magnet type)
Also because we do not have measurements at 1.9 K for each magnet
TripletGeometric, persistent, saturation are estimated magnet by magnetHere we have all the measurements
CorrectorsOnly the transfer function is modeled, not the multipoles
We have measurements but we do not want to complicate the model
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 13
DETAILS OF OPERATION
Precision achieved can be measured by the beamTune control during ramp is within 0.07 [N. Aquilina, et al, PAC 2012]
Not enough for operation, but a very good starting point for the tune feedback
Precision in absolute tune is 0.1 (out of 60) – quad trasfer functions absolute model within 0.15%
64.20
64.25
64.30
64.35
59.20 59.25 59.30 59.35
Qv
(uni
ts)
Qh (units)
beam 1beam 21/2 TeVworking point
tune at 1 TeV
tune at 2 TeV
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 14
DETAILS OF OPERATION
Precision achieved can be measured by the beamBeta beating within 40% at injection, 20% at high field [R. Garcia Tomas, et al. Phys. Rev. STAB 13 (2010) 121004]
Model at injection much more difficult – not a surprise
Chromaticity control within 10 units [N. Aquilina, M. Lamont]Large contribution from sextupolar error in the dipole (200) on the top of nominal chromaticity (60)Snapback (typical of sc magnets) controlled and corrected – not an issue for LHC operation at 4 TeV
Impact of octupole and decapèole on nonlinear chromaticity Q’’ and Q’’’ [E. McLean, F. Schmidt]
E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 15
CONCLUSIONS
We outlined the strategy followed in the LHC for modelling field vs current and expected field errors
FiDeL: the best knowledge of our magnets and of their nonlinearities
Built on considerable effort in measuring magnets during production
WISE: creates instances of the LHC sequence of magnets with their nonlinearities
Uncertainties are being included in the model, so different instances of the machine can be generated