15
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge 2013 17 th April 2013

EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC

  • Upload
    umika

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CERN, Space charge 2013 17 th April 2013. EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC. E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team. CONTENTS. The approach : FiDeL , LSA, Wise The gold mine: LHC magnets production data Details of modeling and operation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco

EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC

E. TodescoCERN, Geneva Switzerland

Thanks to the FiDeL team

CERN, Space charge 201317th April 2013

Page 2: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 2

CONTENTS

The approach: FiDeL, LSA, Wise

The gold mine: LHC magnets production data

Details of modeling and operation

Page 3: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 3

FIDEL AND WISE

FiDeL (Field Description of the LHC)is the conversion of fields/gradients to currentsplus the recipe to precycle magnets to ensure reproducibility and correct modeling

It consists ofA set of equations describing the relation field(current)

Done for the main component + multipolesSo it also models imperfections and field errors

These equations have componentsGeometric (linear)Saturation (high fields)Magnetization both of iron and of conductor (low fields)

CurrentsField & Gradient

s

Page 4: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 4

FIDEL AND WISE

FiDeL (Field Description of the LHC)Each component depends on several parametersThe functional form of each component is specified in [N. Sammut, L. Bottura, J. Micalef et al. Phys. Rev. STAB 012402 (2006)]In some cases relies on a physical model, in others it is a nonlinear fit

Saturation is modeled through a double erf functionMagnetization relies on the known fits of the critical current

Page 5: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 5

FIDEL AND WISE

First step (FiDeL) – magnet expertsFit the magnetic measurements with the FiDeL parametrizationExtract the fit parametersConstruct a DB with these parameters magnet by magnetAssociate to each parameter uncertainties (recent development [P. Hagen, P. Ferracin] )

The result is the summa of the knoweldge on our magnets

Page 6: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 6

FIDEL AND WISE

Second step: export towards CCC – OP groupThis is the need of the control room:

Currents to steer the circuits of the main magnetsCurrents to steer the circuits of the correctors

The control room system (LSA) has the FiDeL parametrization independetely implementedThe DB is reduced from magnet to magnet to circuit to circuit

This is the LSA DB used to steer the accelerator according to the optic filesTrims are also based on FiDeL parametrization (tune, chroma, …)

Obviously, a lot of information is not used (magnet by magnet, high order multipoles for which we have not correctors …)

Page 7: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 7

FIDEL AND WISE

Third step: export towards modeling – ABP groupWISE: Windows Interface for Sequence of Elements [P. Hagen]

Builds the best input for MAD or tracking codes based on our knowledge of the magnetsIt also relies on the information about alignement and geometryIt can associate uncertainties to each component to account for the measurements errors or for missing information

FiDeL parameters, uncertainties

and equations

Sequence of magnetsGeometry

WISE

MAD input file

Page 8: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 8

CONTENTS

The approach: FiDeL, LSA, Wise

The gold mine: LHC magnets production data

Detail of modeling

Page 9: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 9

THE GOLD MINE

Magnetic measurements are the key pointRoom temperature: providing geometric

100% of magnets measured – full knowledgeDone at the industries, in two different stages (redundancy)

Operational conditions (20% dipoles, 10% quadrupoles, 100% triplet)

Done at CERN or in US (triplet)Phenomenology of superconducting magnets radically different from resistive

Magnetization and dynamic effects are the most challengingSaturation proves to be easier and with less variation from magnet to magnet

Page 10: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 10

THE GOLD MINE

Example: measurements of the triplet

0.00320

0.00325

0.00330

0.00335

0.00340

0.00345

0 2000 4000 6000 8000

TF (T

m /

A)

Current (A)

MQXA - Integral

MQXA - DCloop

MQXA19

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

0 5000 10000

TF (U

nits

)

Current (A)

MQXB - integral (all)

MQXB02 - DCloop

Roxie model

MQXB02

Page 11: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 11

CONTENTS

The approach: FiDeL, LSA, Wise

The gold mine: LHC magnets production data

Detail of modeling and operation

Page 12: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 12

DETAILS OF MODELING

Each model is developed with a level of detail appropriate for its relevance in the LHC

We do not model everything for every magnet …Dipoles and quadrupoles

Geometric is estimated magnet by magnetPersistent and saturation component are estimated family by family (i.e. one for each magnet type)

Also because we do not have measurements at 1.9 K for each magnet

TripletGeometric, persistent, saturation are estimated magnet by magnetHere we have all the measurements

CorrectorsOnly the transfer function is modeled, not the multipoles

We have measurements but we do not want to complicate the model

Page 13: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 13

DETAILS OF OPERATION

Precision achieved can be measured by the beamTune control during ramp is within 0.07 [N. Aquilina, et al, PAC 2012]

Not enough for operation, but a very good starting point for the tune feedback

Precision in absolute tune is 0.1 (out of 60) – quad trasfer functions absolute model within 0.15%

64.20

64.25

64.30

64.35

59.20 59.25 59.30 59.35

Qv

(uni

ts)

Qh (units)

beam 1beam 21/2 TeVworking point

tune at 1 TeV

tune at 2 TeV

Page 14: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 14

DETAILS OF OPERATION

Precision achieved can be measured by the beamBeta beating within 40% at injection, 20% at high field [R. Garcia Tomas, et al. Phys. Rev. STAB 13 (2010) 121004]

Model at injection much more difficult – not a surprise

Chromaticity control within 10 units [N. Aquilina, M. Lamont]Large contribution from sextupolar error in the dipole (200) on the top of nominal chromaticity (60)Snapback (typical of sc magnets) controlled and corrected – not an issue for LHC operation at 4 TeV

Impact of octupole and decapèole on nonlinear chromaticity Q’’ and Q’’’ [E. McLean, F. Schmidt]

Page 15: EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD  MODELING  IN THE LHC

E. Todesco Protection in magnet design - 15

CONCLUSIONS

We outlined the strategy followed in the LHC for modelling field vs current and expected field errors

FiDeL: the best knowledge of our magnets and of their nonlinearities

Built on considerable effort in measuring magnets during production

WISE: creates instances of the LHC sequence of magnets with their nonlinearities

Uncertainties are being included in the model, so different instances of the machine can be generated