32
Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the coast and the land-sea interface Françoise Breton ETC-LUSI /UAB EEA coastal atlases conference, 9-10 July 2008, Copenhagen

Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

Experience on testing observatoriesand indicators for the coast and theland-sea interface

Françoise Breton

ETC-LUSI /UAB

EEA coastal atlases conference, 9-10 July 2008,Copenhagen

Page 2: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

Overview

1-EXPERIENCE IN EUROPE1.1.Support to the ICZM Recommendation

– WG-ID (2002-2006)– DEDUCE (INTERREG PROJECT) (2004-2007)

1.2. Development of the LEAC (land and ecosystem accountingmethodology (EEA/ETC-LUSI since 2002)

2-EXPERIENCE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA2.1. The Observatory of Mediterranean wetlands (MEDWET): building

spatial indicators from LEAC methodology

2.2.The ICZM Protocol in the Mediterranean Sea (January 2008), withthe Mediterranean Action Plan UNEP-MAP, PAP-RAC and contractingparties)

2.3. FP7 proposal (2008) for the Mediterranean and the Black Sea

Page 3: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1. Experience in Europe

1.1. Support to the EU ICZM Recommendation(2002-2006)

• Participating in the EU ICZM Expert Group with theMember States representative (Chaired by DG-ENV)

• Chairing the Working –Group on Indicators and data(WG-ID) of the EU ICZM Expert Group

Page 4: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1.Support to the ICZM Recommendation

– The WG-ID Work :

– Review all indicator sets done for the coast

– Propose a set of 27 Indicators to measure SustainableDevelopment at the coast following the 7 Goals of theICZM Recommendation

Page 5: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1.Support to the ICZM Recommendation

–WG-ID Work :

– Build a multi-index indicator to auto-evaluate “Progress in ICZM” (2002-2004)

– Tests by countries and regions (2004-2006)

Page 6: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1.Support to the ICZM Recommendation

– WG-ID Work :

– Build a multi-index indicator to auto-evaluate“Progress in ICZM” (2002-2004)

– Tests by countries and regions (2004-2006)

Page 7: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1.Support to the ICZM Recommendation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Malta, all levels

Yes No Don't know

Page 8: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1. ICZM implementation: results• 8 countries out of 20 coastal countries of the EU,

have tested the ICZM Progress indicator makingtheir auto-evaluation, (40% of participation) + 4regions

• During the process, guidance and questionnairehave been translated in Flemish, Polish, French andSpanish.

• Results show that between 2000 and 2005 there isa general trend of progress in ICZMimplementation.

Page 9: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1. DEDUCE

• WG-ID planned task: Production of fact-sheets for the 27 SD indicators

• Searching for available data at different scales, identifying standarddata for comparison and gaps

• Establishing methodology for measurements and resulting figures andmaps

• Presentation of results in a multi-scale format , assessment and mainmessages

As it is time and effort consuming WG-ID partners decide to apply foran INTERREG fund : DEDUCE project (DEveloppement Durablepour les Cotes Européennes) (2004-2007)

-Partners:FRANCE, SPAIN/Catalonia, MALTA,POLAND, LATVIA,BELGIUM/Flanders,

Page 10: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1.DEDUCE objectives (2004-2007)

Additional goals: -Common reporting format

Page 11: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1.DEDUCE products•Example: Area of build up land

•Indicator fact sheet

•www.deduce.org

Page 12: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.1.DEDUCE: Results at different scales

•In 2006, 14 countries (out of 20) haveused a SD indicator in their national ICZMStrategy (70%of the countries)

Page 13: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.2. Development of the methodology on landand ecosystem account (LEAC)

Land cover is an (ex-post) image of land use andecosystems condition

Page 14: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.2.Land andEcosystem

Accounting (LEAC)

• Databases

The core data of the LEAC project have beenstructured in a relational database model inorder to allow quick and easy analyses. Thesedatabases have been made publicly accessiblethrough the Internet

• LEAC map layers

From the LEAC database, various geographicallayers have been derived such as land coverflows, Corilis, the green potential backgroundlayer and the dominant land-cover types

• Interactive tools

Online Analytical Processing (OLAP cube) pivotapplications and methodological guidebook

Page 15: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.2.Urban sprawl in the province of Venice, 1990-2000, cells of 1 km x 1 km – wetlands in the

background Legend

Land uptake by urban

Value

0 - 2

2 - 5

5 - 100

Inland marshes

Peat bogs

Salt marshes

Salines

Intertidal flats

Water courses

Water bodies

Coastal lagoons

Estuaries

Wetlands

Despite possible threats from sea level rise andthe permanent ecological problems of the lagoondue to agriculture eutrophicating surpluses, urbanand infrastructures development has continued inthe province of Venice.

Net change in coastal land

cover 1990-2000

% of initial year

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

%

Artif icial areas

Arable land & permanent crops

Pastures & mosaics

Forested land

Semi-natural vegetation

Open spaces/ bare soils

Wetlands

Water bodies

Page 16: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1.2.OLAP-CUBE prototype for LEAC

Page 17: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2-EXPERIENCE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA

2.1.Partner of the Observatory on Mediterraneanwetlands with MEDWET (since January 2007)

-Mapping the Mediterranean wetlands

-Developing methodology for Ecosystem’s accounts(LEAC): New spatial modeling techniques for mappingbiodiversity potential

-Accounting for Biodiversity in the Mediterranean coastsand wetlands

Page 18: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.1.Mapping ofMediterranean Wetland

Core classes

> 5% in a 5 kmradius

+ Adjacent classes

CORINE

Methodology for automatic mapping

Page 19: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

CASE 2 – La Camargue

1. The Camargue

2.1.Mapping Mediterranean wetlands with CLC

Page 20: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2 - Amvrakikos

2.1.Mapping Mediterranean wetlands with CLC

Page 21: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.1.The macro scale picture with Globcover (v2.ESAJuly2008)

Identification of wetlandsnot declared at Ramsar

Sources: GlobCover2005 – courtesy European Space AgencyRamsar database – courtesy Wetlands International

•Agreement between ESA and EEA to produce a CORINElike product from GC•A GlobCorine Product produced by EEA for the Med andpanEurope end 2008•Wetland mapping

Page 22: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.1.New spatial modeling techniques formapping biodiversity potential

1.The Green BackgroundLandscape index2. Naturilis (N2000+CDDA) index3. MEFF, Mesh size index

4. The Net LandscapeEcological Potential Index

Page 23: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

1990

2.1.Land cover change accounts 90-2000• Change in Landscape Ecological Potential of SES Wetlands,

ES,FR, IT, GR – 10 km strip

Change1990-20002000

Page 24: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.1.Accounting for Biodiversity in theMediterranean coasts and wetlands

Page 25: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.1.Accounting for Biodiversity in theMediterranean coasts and wetlands

Page 26: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.1.Accounting for Biodiversity by regions

Page 27: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

Acounting tables for wetlands using the OLAP-CUBE prototype for LEAC

Page 28: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.2.The ICZM Protocol in the MediterraneanSea (January 2008)

New paradigm: land/sea/river interface; maritime activities; new“integrated”way of doing

Work with the 22 Med countries

Page 29: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.2. Supporting ICZM Protocol

• Program under preparation between the RegionalActivity Center on ICZM (PAP/RAC Split) and theEEA to work together in 2009 and following years

1. Stocktake:-Identify what countries will need to implement the Protocol-Data and indicators needed for ICZM Protocol implementation

2. Awareness, capacity building and training-meeting with people doing the job-network development-process facilitating construction of a common

Information system

Page 30: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

2.3. FP7 proposal (2008) for theMediterranean and the Black Sea

• Vehicule to implement our methodology/Long term objectivevision

• Developping assessment tools– EU Indicators and their adaptatio to the Mediterranean– Land accounts for coast and sea

• land cover, Sea bed mapping; Maritime uses;

– Ecosystem accounts for coastal and sea units,– Scenario and outlook

• Organizing data/SDI• Tests in local sites, in coastal cities & regions, and in all

Mediterranean basin (nested information)• Network building: Validation of results/participation, capacity

building and training by stakeholdersimplementation

Page 31: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

Conclusions• Experience in Europe and in the Mediterranean

– ICZM process• Support to policy needs• Network development• Data flows and indicator production• Working with stakeholders on training & capacity building• Sense of ownership by decision makers

– Developing LEAC methodology• CLC/GlobCorine• Mapping specific areas• Accounting methodology for land, ecosystems and water• Production of indicators e.g new spatial modeling techniques for mapping

biodiversity potential• Validation and implementation by stakeholders

– Both activities will contribute to the development of the European andMediterranean coastal atlas

Page 32: Experience on testing observatories and indicators for the ...dusk.geo.orst.edu/ICAN_EEA/EEA_Interreg_DEDUCE.pdf · 1.1. ICZM implementation: results • 8 countries out of 20 coastal

Thank you!