6
www.trca.ca/swp EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT F E N W OO D H E IG H T S K IN G S T O N R O A D BARKDENE HILLS B R I M L E Y R O A D S O UT H F AI R C R O F T B O U L E V A R D SCARBOROUGH BLUFFS PARK BLUFFER’S PARK SCARBOROUGH BLUFFS PARK BLUFFER’S PARK CUDIA PARK CUDIA PARK ŵďĂLJŵĞŶƚ ĮƐŚ ŚĂďŝƚĂƚ BLUE FLAG BEACH BLUE FLAG BEACH To Central Segment ^ƚĞĞƉ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ǁŝƚŚ ŶŽ ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ƚƌĂŝů tĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚ dƌĂŝů ŽŶ ƌŽƵƚĞ WƌŝǀĂƚĞ ƐŚŽƌĞůŝŶĞ ,ŝŐŚ ƌŝƐŬ ƚŽ ƉƵďůŝĐ ƐĂĨĞƚLJ >Žǁ ĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ ŽĨ ĮƐŚ ŚĂďŝƚĂƚ BLUFFER’S PARK: LATE STAGES OF STABILIZATION CATHERDRAL BLUFFS: MIDDLE TO LATE STAGES OF STABILIZATION CUDIA BLUFFS: ERODING, WILL STABILIZE džŝƐƟŶŐ ŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ Ͳ tĞƐƚ ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚ Area of Natural and ^ĐŝĞŶƟĮĐ Interest (ANSI) Environmentally ^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ƌĞĂ ;^Ϳ Wetlands Dunes džŝƐƟŶŐ dƌĂŝůƐ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ ZŽĂĚ džŝƐƟŶŐ /ŶĨŽƌŵĂů dƌĂŝů Waterfront Trail Hazard Setback Private Shoreline FISH AND WILDLIFE A variety of fish and wildlife species have been recorded during TRCA surveys. A sample of species is listed below. Wildlife 39 species recorded during surveys including: Bank Swallow, American Mink and Common Snapping Turtle Fish 46 species recorded during surveys including: Northern Pike, Pumpkinseed, Rock Bass and Yellow Perch Did You Know: Bluffer’s Park was constructed in the 1970’s. It led to the build-up of the existing sand beach Bank Swallows use the Bluffs across the entire Segment. Wood Thrush and Chimney Swift VSHFLHV DW ULVN KDYH EHHQ REVHUYHG LQ WKLV 6HJPHQW. Bluffer’s Park Beach Cudia Bluffs Bank Swallow Northern Pike Photo Credit: USFWS

EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

www.trca.ca/swp

EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

FENW

OOD HEIG

HTS

KINGSTON ROAD

BARKDENE HILLS

BRIM

LEY R

OAD SOUTH

FAIR

CROFT

BOULE

VARD

SCARBOROUGHBLUFFS PARK

BLUFFER’S PARK

SCARBOROUGHBLUFFS PARK

BLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

BLUE FLAG BEACH

BLUE FLAG BEACH

To Central Segment

BLUFFER’S PARK: LATE STAGES OF STABILIZATION

CATHERDRAL BLUFFS: MIDDLE TO LATE

STAGES OF STABILIZATION

CUDIA BLUFFS: ERODING, WILL

STABILIZE

Area of Natural and Interest (ANSI)

Environmentally

Wetlands

Dunes

Waterfront Trail

Hazard Setback

Private Shoreline

FISH AND WILDLIFEA variety of fish and wildlife species have been recorded during TRCA surveys. A sample of species is listed below.

Wildlife39 species recorded during surveys including: Bank Swallow, American Mink and Common Snapping Turtle

Fish46 species recorded during surveys including: Northern Pike, Pumpkinseed, Rock Bass and Yellow Perch

Did You Know:• Bluffer’s Park was constructed in the 1970’s. It

led to the build-up of the existing sand beach

• Bank Swallows use the Bluffs across theentire Segment.

• Wood Thrush and Chimney Swift.

Bluffer’s Park Beach Cudia Bluffs

Bank Swallow Northern Pike Photo Credit: USFWS

Page 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

LEGEND

L A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I O

Existing TrailsProposed Improvements

ssm0100 300200100

SCALE 1:14,000

Doris McCarthy Trail

Doris McCarthy Trail

BLUFFER’S PARKBLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFEBLUFFER’S PARK ROAD

CATH

EDRA

L BLU

FFS D

RI

FENW

OOD HEI

GE HILLS

EN CRESCENT

FAIR

CR

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

Bridge with Short Spans

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFE

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

Bridge with Long Spans

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFE

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

OVERALL MOST PREFERRED INTERMEDIATE PREFERRED INTERMEDIATE PREFERRED

• Greatest improvements to terrestrial andaquatic habitat.

• Smallest loss of tableland from erosion.

• Addresses risks to public safety.

• Greatest change to existing character ofsand beach.

• Provides inclusive, continuous public accessalong waterfront.

• Provides Emergency Services access along fulllength of waterfront.

• Small amount of high quality aquatic habitat improvements.

• Largest loss of tablelands from erosion.

• Addresses risks to public safety.

• Minor changes to existing character ofsand beach.

• Provides continuous public access along waterfront, for most users.

• No additional Emergency Services access.

• Small amount of high quality aquatic habitat improvements.

• Largest loss of tablelands from erosion.

• Addresses risks to public safety.

• Minor changes to existing character of sand beach.

• Provides continuous public access along waterfront, for most users.

• No additional Emergency Services access

OBJECTIVES EVALUATION Natural Heritage Most Preferred Preferred Intermediate Preferred

Risk Most Preferred Intermediate Preferred Intermediate Preferred

Experience Preferred Intermediate Preferred Intermediate Preferred

Coordination Most Preferred Preferred Intermediate Preferred

Cost Preferred Intermediate Preferred Least Preferred

WEST SEGMENT

www.trca.ca/swp

ALTERNATIVES

Description:• Headland-beach system, boardwalk over cobble beach.• Dimensions (approximate):

- Boardwalk: 4 to 5 m wideand 650 m long

Description:• Bridge connection with short spans• Dimensions (approximate):

- 3 m wide with 30 m spans- 600 m long

All West Segment Alternatives• Provide safe public access between Bluffer’s

Park and Meadowcliffe (except Do Nothing).• Retain exi ting Blue Flag Beach.• Improve access along Brimley Road

(except Do Nothing).• Habitat enhancements (except Do Nothing).

Description:• Bridge connection with long spans• Dimensions (approximate):

- 3 m wide with 100 m spans- 600 m long

BoardwalkHeadlandCobble Beach between Headlands

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFE

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

ALTERNATIVE 1 - Headland-Beach ALTERNATIVE 2B - Bridge (long span)ALTERNATIVE 2A - Bridge (short span)

Page 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

LEGEND

L A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I O

Existing TrailsProposed Improvements

ssm0100 300200100

SCALE 1:14,000

Doris McCarthy Trail

Doris McCarthy Trail

BLUFFER’S PARKBLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFEBLUFFER’S PARK ROAD

CATH

EDRA

L BLU

FFS D

RI

FENW

OOD HEI

GE HILLS

EN CRESCENT

FAIR

CR

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

OVERALL LEAST PREFERRED INTERMEDIATE PREFERRED LEAST PREFERRED

• Embayment habitat that would be created,not suitable for open coast.

• Moderate loss of tablelands from erosion.

• Addresses risk to public safety.

• Minor changes to existing character of sand beach.

• Provides continuous public access along waterfront,for most users.

• No additional Emergency Services access

• Moderate improvements to terrestrial andaquatic habitat.

• Largest loss of tablelands from erosion.

• Addresses risk to public safety.

• Minor changes to existing character of sand beach.

• Provides continuous public access along waterfront,for most users.

• No additional Emergency Services access.

• Embayment habitat that would be created,not suitable for open coast.

• Moderate loss of tablelands from erosion.

• Addresses risk to public safety.

• Greatest change to existing character of sand beach.

• Results in less direct access to the water.

• Provides inclusive, continuous public accessalong waterfront.

• Provides Emergency Services access along full length of waterfront.

OBJECTIVES EVALUATION Natural Heritage Least Preferred Intermediate Preferred Least Preferred

Risk Intermediate Preferred Intermediate Preferred Most Preferred

Experience Intermediate Preferred Intermediate Preferred Least Preferred

Coordination Least Preferred Intermediate Preferred Least Preferred

Cost Preferred Intermediate Preferred Preferred

RampArmour Stone CausewayCulvert

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWMEADOW

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

WEST SEGMENT

www.trca.ca/swp

ALTERNATIVES

Description:• 5 to 6 islands linked by bridges.• Dimensions (approximate):

- Islands: 50 to 100 m long- Bridges: 3 m wide and 30 m long

Description:• 3 islands linked by bridges.• Dimensions (approximate):

- Islands: 120 m long- Bridges: 3m wide and 100 m long

All West Segment Alternatives• Provide safe public access between Bluffer’s

Park and Meadowcliffe (except Do Nothing).• Retain exi ting Blue Flag Beach.• Improve access along Brimley Road

(except Do Nothing).• Habitat enhancements (except Do Nothing).

Description:• Armourstone-protected causeway crossing.

• Dimensions (approximate):

- 30 m wide and 650 m long

ALTERNATIVE 3A - Island-Bridge (short spans) ALTERNATIVE 4 - CausewayALTERNATIVE 3B - Island-Bridge (long spans)

RampIslandsBridge with Long Spans

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWMEADOW

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

RampIslandsBridge with Short Spans

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWMEADOW

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

Page 4: EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

OVERALL PREFERRED MOST PREFERRED INTERMEDIATE PREFERRED

• Greatest improvements to terrestrial andaquatic habitat.

• Smallest loss of tableland from erosion.

• Addresses risk to public safety.

• Expands sand beach capacity.

• Provides continuous public access along waterfront,for most users.

• Provides additional Emergency Services accessalong waterfront.

• Greatest improvements to terrestrial andaquatic habitat.

• Smallest loss of tablelands from erosion.

• Minimizes risk to public safety.

• Greater expansion of sand beach capacity.

• Provides inclusive, continuous public accessalong waterfront.

• Provides additional Emergency Services accessalong waterfront.

• No improvements to terrestrial and aquatic habitat.

• Largest loss tablelands from erosion.

• Does not address risk to public safety.

• Maintains existing character of sand beach.

• Does not provide inclusive, continuous publicaccess along waterfront.

OBJECTIVES EVALUATION Natural Heritage Most Preferred Most Preferred Intermediate Preferred

Risk Preferred Most Preferred Least Preferred

Experience Preferred Most Preferred Least Preferred

Coordination Most Preferred Most Preferred Least Preferred

Cost Least Preferred Intermediate Preferred Most Preferred

BLUFFER’S PARKBLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFES PARK ROAD

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

LEGEND

L A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I O

Existing TrailsProposed Improvements

ssm0100 300200100

SCALE 1:14,000

Carthy TrailCarthy Trail

BLUFFER’S PARKBLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFEBLUFFER’S PARK ROAD

CATH

EDRA

L B

FENW

ENT

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

WEST SEGMENT

www.trca.ca/swp

ALTERNATIVES

Description:• Headland expansion at Meadowcliffe and Bluffer’s Park.• Expanded sand beach.• Bridge connection to Meadowcliffe.• Dimensions (approximate):

- Beach expansion: 30 m into Lake Ontario- Headlands: 130 m (Bluffer’s Park) and 100 m into the lake- Bridge: 3 m wide, 30 m spans and 600 m long

Description:• Headland expansion at Meadowcliffe and Bluffer’s Park.• Expanded sand beach.• Bridge connection to Meadowcliffe.• Dimensions (approximate):

- Beach expansion: 60 m into Lake Ontario- Headlands: 230 m (Bluffer’s Park) and 200 m into the lake- Boardwalk: 4 - 5 m wide and 650 m long

All West Segment Alternatives:• Provide safe public access between Bluffer’s

Park and Meadowcliffe (except Do Nothing).• Retain exi ting Blue Flag Beach.• Improve access along Brimley Road

(except Do Nothing).• Habitat enhancements (except Do Nothing).

Description:• No safe public access between Bluffer’s Park

and Meadowcliffe provided.

• No changes to Waterfront Trail Route, some portionson shared roadways.

• Existing maintenance ongoing.

ALTERNATIVE 5A Beach Expansion (narrow) DO NOTHING - Existing ConditionsALTERNATIVE 5B - Beach Expansion (wide)

L A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I O

Headland Protected WithArmour Stone Revetment

Cobble BeachBridge with Short SpansExpanded Sand Beach

BLUFFER’S PARKBLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFEPARK ROAD

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

L A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I O

Headland Protected WithArmour Stone Revetment

Trail SetbackBoardwalkExpanded Sand Beach Waterline

BLUFFER’S PARKBLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFEPARK ROAD

BLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

Page 5: EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

OBJECTIVEAlternative 1 - Headland-

Beach

Alternative 2A – Bridge

(Short Span)

Alternative 2B – Bridge

(Long Span)

Alternative 3A - Island-Bridge

(Short Span)

Alternative 3B - Island-Bridge

(Long Span)

Alternative 4 - Causeway

Alternative 5A – Beach

Expansion (Narrow)

Alternative 5B – Beach

Expansion (Wide)

Do Nothing

Natural Environment MP P IP LP IP LP MP MP IP

Risk MP IP IP IP IP MP P MP LP

Experience P IP IP IP IP LP P MP LP

Coordination MP P IP LP IP LP MP MP LP

Cost P IP LP P IP P LP IP MP

OVERALLMost

PreferredIntermediate

PreferredIntermediate

PreferredLeast

PreferredIntermediate

PreferredLeast

PreferredPreferred

Most Preferred

Intermediate Preferred

Least Preferred

Intermediate Preferred

Preferred

Most Preferred

LEGEND:

WEST SEGMENT

www.trca.ca/swp

EVALUATION

Alternative 1 - Headland-Beach and Alternative 5B - Beach Expansion (Wide) were both evaluated as Most Preferred.

Alternative 5B - Beach Expansion (Wide) has been selected as the Preliminary Preferred Segment Alternative as it will provide a more enjoyable waterfront experience.

L A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I O

McCarthy Trail

McCarthy Trail

L A K E O N T A R I OL A K E O N T A R I O

Headland Protected WithArmour Stone Revetment

Trail SetbackBoardwalkExpanded Sand Beach Waterline

SCARBOROUGHBLUFFS PARK

BLUFFER’S PARK

SCARBOROUGHBLUFFS PARK

BLUFFER’S PARK

CUDIA PARKCUDIA PARK

MEADOWCLIFFEMEADOWCLIFFEBLUFFER’S PARK ROAD

CATH

EDRA

L BLU

FENW

OO SCENTBLUE FLAG BEACHBLUE FLAG BEACH

Page 6: EXISTING CONDITIONS : WEST SEGMENT

WEST SEGMENT

www.trca.ca/swp

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT:

• Greatest improvements to terrestrialand aquatic habitat.

RISK:

• Minimizes risks and provides safe public access.

• Improves access for emergency services.

EXPERIENCE:

• Provides full access for all to expanded sand beach.

• 250 m of shoreline added to public ownership.

COORDINATION:

• Most compatible with applicable plans andinitiatives, and existing land use.

COST:

• Higher to construct.

• Lower to maintain (long term).

PRELIMINARY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Increase size of sand beach Safe, continuous access along water’s edge Improve terrestrial habitat

Existing Condition Preliminary Preferred Alternative (CONCEPT)

Alternative 5B - Beach Expansion (Wide)