Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Exempt or Non-Exempt? Overcoming the
Latest Employee Misclassification Challenges Conducting Self-Audits, Identifying Vulnerabilities, Correcting Errors,
and Minimizing Liability Under FLSA and State Law
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2017
Brent E. Pelton, Partner, Pelton Graham, New York
Noel P. Tripp, Principal, Jackson Lewis, Melville, N.Y.
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-370-2805 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Continuing Education Credits
In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your
participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance
Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email
that you will receive immediately following the program.
For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926
ext. 35.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Employee Misclassification Challenges
Current Trends & Vulnerable Positions
Brent E. Pelton, Esq. Pelton Graham LLC
111 Broadway, Suite 1503 New York, New York 10006
www.peltonlaw.com 8/22/2017
Uncertain Future of Federal Overtime Rules
The Obama Administration Department of Labor issued revised overtime regulations that would have raised the weekly salary threshold from $455 to $913--$47,476 annually
The revised overtime rule was struck down by a federal court less than a month before it was scheduled to be implemented and enforced. The Trump administration has indicated that it will not seek to enforce the revised regulations.
The Trump Administration Department of Labor has published another Request for Information in July, 2017 and may seek to make incremental changes to the overtime threshold or other overtime regulations
5 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Workers in the News Cheerleaders: In 2014 cheerleaders for the Cincinnati Bengals, Buffalo Bills,
Oakland Raiders and Tampa Bay Buccaneers filed lawsuits, alleging that they should be treated as employees and are owed extensive backpay.
The Buccaneers settled for over $800,000 and the Raiders for $1.25 million. A Class Member appealed the Raiders settlement, which was affirmed by the California Court of Appeals as fair, adequate and reasonable.
In May 2017, the Buffalo Bills Cheerleaders won partial summary judgment on the issue of whether two companies were joint employers of the cheerleaders. The matter remains pending.
6 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Workers in the News: Direct Care Aides
In 2015, the Department of Labor’s final rules regarding domestic service workers were implemented, narrowing the domestic service exemption.
The domestic service exemption is are only available 1) to companionship and live-in domestic service employees 2) in situations where the employee is employed directly by the individual, family or household—the exemptions cannot be claimed by a third-party agency
“Companionship services” is defined as the “provision of fellowship and protection,” such as conversation and accompaniment on errands. Tasks relating to care with the activities of daily living must not exceed 20% of the total work hours.
7 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Workers in the News: Energy Sector In 2015 and 2016, the U.S. Department of Labor imposed millions of dollars in fines
on oil and gas companies for violations of overtime. Common violations included misclassification of non-exempt employees, failure to include regular bonuses in calculating worker’s correct overtime rate, and failure to pay for off-the-clock hours.
Inquiries are extremely fact-specific and not tied to titles.
Tankerman: Compare Owens v. SeaRiver Maritime (5th Cir. 2001) (Tankerman was not a seaman because most of his duties were loading and unloading petroleum products from the barges) with Coffin v. Blessey Marine Services, 71 F.3d 276 (5th Cir. Nov. 13, 2014) (Tankerman who lived on vessel was a seaman and therefore exempt from overtime)
Mud Engineers: In May 2017, Fifth Circuit overturned a Texas decision finding drilling fluid specialists, also called “mud engineers.” Case was reversed and remanded because there were issues of fact as to whether their duties of stabilizing mud systems “non-manual work directly related to the general business operations.”
8
8 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Workers in the News: Truck Drivers
McMaster v. Eastern Armored Car Services (3d Cir. Mar. 11, 2015): Truck drivers who spend 50% of their time driving vehicles weighing under 10,000 pounds are entitled to overtime under the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008.
In Jan. 2017, an Arizona judge granted summary judgment to truck drivers for Swift Transportation Co., finding that the drivers were employees, not independent contractors, thus exempting their contracts from federal and state arbitration acts, which specifcally exempt “contracts of employment” of transportation workers. Doe v. Swift Transportation Co., (D.Az. 2017). Swift has appealed the decision.
9 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Uber/Lyft Driver Classification Ride-sharing drivers across the country have filed numerous suits seeking
minimum wage and overtime.
Uber/Lyft claim their drivers are independent contractors; drivers claim these companies exercise sufficient supervision and control that they should be considered regular employees
In July 2017, a North Carolina court conditionally certified a nationwide action brought by Uber drivers. However, in June 2017, a Florida court denied conditional certification in a similar action.
Other gig economy cases are pending. In June 2017, a California court denied summary judgment to GrubHub in a case brought by a delivery driver who claimed he was misclassified as an independent contactor.
10 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Student Athletes In March 2014, NLRB declared Northwestern football players to be employees. In
October 2014, one student athlete filed a class action complaint against the entire NCAA for unpaid wages: Sackos v. NCAA, 14-cv-1710 (S.D.Ind. Oct. 20, 2014)
In April 2017, a California judge dismissed a class-action suit by a former college football player, finding “no legal basis” for finding player to be employee. Dawson v. NCAA (N.D. Cal. 2017). Plaintiff has appealed to the 9th Circuit.
In December 2016, the 7th Circuit ruled that track and field athletes at University of Pennsylvania were not employees under the FLSA. However, a concurring opinion in the 7th Circuit matter suggested that their reasoning might not extend to student receiving athletic scholarships in “revenue” sports such as football and basketball, since that could alter the ‘economic realty’ of the situation. Berger v. NCAA (7th Circ. 2016)
Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com 11
Are Managers, Assistant Managers Exempt? Managers and assistant managers in particular are increasingly common
plaintiffs:
In May 2017, Wal-Mart reached a confidential settlement with assistant store managers who claimed that they did not have true managerial duties or authority but were in fact hired to do the work of hourly, non-exempt employees. Cardoza v. Wal-Mart (N.D. Cal. 2015).
In 2016, PNC Bank reached a $6 million lawsuit with assistant branch managers who claimed that they primarily performed teller duties. Briggs v. PNC Fin. Serv. Grp. (N.D. Ill. 2015)
In 2016, the Bob Evans restaurant chain settled an overtime action with assistant managers for $16.5 million. The assistant managers alleged that they performed manual duties such as cooking, cleaning, and operating the cash register and had very few managerial duties. Snodgrass v. Bob Evans Farms (S.D. Oh. 2012)
Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com 12
Managers and Assistant Managers: What Factors Determine Status?
Morgan v. Family Dollar, 551 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2008): Managers not exempt because they spent 80-90% of time on manual labor, had duties proscribed by store manual, were closely supervised by district managers.
In re Family Dollar FLSA Litigation, 637 F.3d 509 (4th Cir. 2011): Manager exempt because she multi-tasked between managerial and manual tasks, was the highest ranking employee at the store, her income depended on store’s success, and she had authority over other employees.
Madden v. Lumber One Home Center, No. 13-2214 (8th Cir. Mar. 17, 2014): Two plaintiffs not exempt, one exempt. Court looked at level of input into personnel decisions – casual input solicited from all employees does not make an employee an executive.
Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com 13
Computer Workers: Rates and Duties Computer worker exemption requires careful consideration of
both how employees are paid and the nature of their work.
Jones v. Judge Technical Services, Inc., (E.D.Pa. 2010): Partial summary judgment for plaintiff. While computer workers may be paid on an hourly basis, they must be paid at least $27.63 for each hour worked, not simply an average of $27.63 for all hours worked.
Heffelfinger v. Electronic Data Sys. , (9th Cir. 2012): Two plaintiffs exempt, one not exempt. Exempt plaintiff developed standards and procedures, affected company policy by making recommendations, monitored and managed important databases, suggested solutions to meet client needs, extensively supervised employees. Non-exempt plaintiff spent little time on administrative work, main duty was creating and modifying programs to meet business needs.
14 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Interns
Cases in a wide range of industries: movie production, magazine publishing, multimedia online content and blogging, modeling. Settlements are pricey: NBC settled with SNL interns for $6.4 million in Eliastam v. NBC Univ. Media, (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Conde Nast settled for $5.8 million in Ballinger v. Advance Magazine Publishers, (S.D.N.Y. 2013).
An SDNY judge award summary judgment to plaintiff interns against Fox Searchlight Pictures, but the Second Circuit in 2016 found the judge’s reasoning “too rigid” and remanded, ordering that the “proper question is whether the intern or the employer is the primary beneficiary of the relationship.” The case settled in 2016 with a payout of about $500 per intern. Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures (S.D.N.Y. 2011).
15 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Volunteers and Seasonal/ Recreation Establishments
Chen v. Major League Baseball No. 13-CV-5494 (SDNY Mar. 25, 2014): Claim of “FanFest” volunteer dismissed because “FanFest” is a seasonal business exempted by FLSA. Court did not decide whether Plaintiff could be considered employee based on nature of work.
Liebesman v. Competitor Group No. 14-CV-1653 (ED Mo. May 11, 2015): Court denied motion to dismiss lawsuit filed by bicycle escort for marathon and half-marathon, finding that court did not have enough information to decide whether races were amusement or recreation establishment and whether separate races counted as separate or single establishment.
16
16 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
New York Minimum Wage Updates Beginning December 31, 2016, the minimum wage in New York
State will be staggered, depending upon the location and size of the employer.
Employers in New York City will pay higher wages, followed by employers in Long Island and Westchester, with employers in the rest of New York State having a lower minimum wage.
Required minimum wage rate will also be higher for New York City employers with 11 or more employees.
The incremental changes will eventually raise all New York State workers to a $15.00 minimum wage. Employees in New York City large businesses will reach $15 in 2019, employees in NYC small business in 2020, employees of Westchester and Long Island businesses 2022, and sometime thereafter for employees throughout the rest of the state.
17 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
New York Construction and Commercial Goods Transportation Fair Play Acts NYS Construction Fair Play Act and
NYS Commercials Goods Transportation Fair Play Act
Workers in these industries presumed to be employees unless the worker meets one of two tests:
“ABC” test: A) is free from control and direction in performing work, B) performs duties outside employer’s usual course of business and C) engages in an independently established business; OR
“Separate business entity” test: Meets 12 criteria, focusing on worker’s independence as to manner of work, financial independence from employer, independence as to business operations
18 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
Related FLSA Questions: Unclean Hands and Salary Deductions
Employee responsibility for under-reporting: Bailey v. TitleMax of Georgia, Inc. (11th Cir 2015): Where supervisor instructed employee to work off-the-clock and edited his time records, employee’s claim for overtime where he under-reported his hours worked in violation of company policy was not barred by unclean hands defense.
Salary deductions: Ellis v. J.R.’s Country Stores, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3667 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2015): Although salary deductions can transform salaried employee into non-exempt, one single salary deduction did not transform manager into non-exempt employee.
19 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
FLSA Settlement Approval under Cheeks Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. (2d Cir. 2015). The Second Circuit held
that courts must approve private FLSA settlements and the parties may not simply file a stipulation of dismissal.
Second Circuit was concerned about several aspects of the Cheeks settlement, including a highly restrictive confidentiality provision, a broad release waiving every possible claim against defendants including unknown and unrelated claims, attorney fee provisions providing for an award of over 40% of the settlement, and a promise by attorneys not to represent anyone bringing similar claims against the employer.
Courts in the Second Circuit have simultaneously tended to disfavor high FLSA multipliers, finding the lodestar multipliers of around 2 are appropriate for most FLSA matters.
20 Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
21
Pelton Graham LLC // www.peltongraham.com
In 2015, the number of FLSA lawsuits brought by employees against
employers reached a record high of over 8,500 cases.
Source: TSheets (https://www.tsheets.com/flsa-research-tool) and US Courts (www.uscourts.gov)
21
Noel P. Tripp
Principal
Long Island Office
August 22, 2017
Salary Basis and Other Current Exemption Considerations
Salary Basis
Salary basis test:
• Employee must be paid a predetermined and fixed salary
that is not subject to reduction because of variations in the
quality or quantity of work performed.
Salary level test:
• The amount of salary paid must meet a minimum specified
in the regulations.
Duties test:
• Primary duties must involve executive, administrative, or
professional duties, as defined in regulations.
23 23
Salary Basis -- FLSA
Following Puzder’s withdrawal, Trump nominated Alexander
Acosta.
• Sworn in on April 28, 2017
• 27th Secretary of the US DOL
• Former republican member of the NLRB
• Dean of Law School at FIU
• Earned his undergraduate and law degree from Harcard
“Unlike Andy Puzder, Alexander Acosta’s nomination deserves serious
consideration,” said organized labor representative Richard Trumka.
“In one day, we’ve gone from a fast-food CEO who routinely violates
labor law to a public servant with experience enforcing it.”
Under Trump, the DOL is expected to be more business-
friendly, and to shift its focus to achieving compliance
rather than aggressive enforcement
24
Salary Basis -- FLSA
Obama Administration’s Salary Level Increase
$47,476
[$913/week]
$23,660
[$455/week]
Not so fast…
25
Salary Basis -- FLSA
• State of Nevada, et al. v. U.S. Department of Labor
• November 22, 2016 - Texas Federal District Judge Arnos
Mazzant III enjoins implementation of the rule
• DOL appeals to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
• DOL has just filed their reply brief on appeal – they are
contesting the District Court’s finding that they do not
have authority to establish the salary basis, but are not
advocating for the salary basis set forth in the rule
• Acosta has signaled willingness to raise to low $30,000s
• Generally speaking employers have followed the
injunction and not changed their practices. Alvarez v.
Chipotle (D.N.J., Complaint filed June 7, 2017)
challenges position
26
Salary Basis -- FLSA
July 26, 2017 – DOL issues request for information seeking
public comment on eleven questions, including:
• Whether the salary threshold should vary based on factors like
size of employer, census region, census division, state,
metropolitan statistical area, or some other method;
• Whether executive, administrative and professional
employees should be subject to different salary thresholds;
• Whether employers increased salaries of exempt employees
(to $913 or more) in anticipation of the overtime rule going
into effect or whether employers adopted other strategies to
deal with employees who would have been newly eligible for
overtime pay under the rule;
• Whether a test for exemption that relies solely on duties (and
does not consider salary) would be preferable, and, if so, what
duties should be included; and
• Whether the salary threshold should be automatically updated
from time to time, and, if so, how updates should be
calculated.
27
Salary Basis -- FLSA
Deadline to respond to RFI is September 25, 2017
Possibility of reversal by Fifth Circuit, with potential for
retroactive application of rule to December 1, 2016.
28
Salary Basis – State Law
New York Labor Law
New York Department of Labor Minimum Wage Orders
• Miscellaneous Industries and Occupations
• Hospitality Industry Wage Order
New Wage Orders implemented on 12/31/16: splits the
state up into size and geographic regions
Distinction between overtime exemption under state law
and “employee” exclusion
29
NYC Large Employer
“Salary Basis” Increases
30
Date State Salary Basis Amount (per
week)
12/31/2016 $825
12/31/2017 $975
12/31/2018 $1,125
12/31/2019 $1,125
12/31/2020 $1,125
12/31/2021 $1,125
30
NYC Small Employer
“Salary Basis” Increases
31
Date State Salary Basis Amount (per week)
12/31/2016 $787.50
12/31/2017 $900
12/31/2018 $1,102.50
12/31/2019 $1,125
12/31/2020 $1,125
12/31/2021 $1,125
31
“Long Island & Westchester” Salary Basis
Increases
32
Date State Salary Basis Amount (per week)
12/31/2016 $750
12/31/2017 $825
12/31/2018 $900
12/31/2019 $975
12/31/2020 $1,050
12/31/2021 $1,125
32
Remainder of NY State
“Salary Basis” Increases
33
Date State Salary Basis Amount (per week)
12/31/2016 $727.50
12/31/2017 $780
12/31/2018 $832
12/31/2019 $885
12/31/2020 $937.50
12/31/2021 $937.50
33
Strategies for Responding to Salary Level
Changes
Identify employees who no longer meet the salary level test.
Then:
1) Raise salary levels and consider other changes to
compensation package;
2) Reclassify: hourly, salaried non-exempt, fluctuating
workweek. Numerous legal and costing considerations
associated with each.
34 34
Executive Employees Are Employees….
Whose primary duty is management of the enterprise in
which the employee is employed or of a customarily
recognized department or subdivision thereof;
Who customarily and regularly directs the work of two or
more other employees; and
Who has the authority to hire or fire other employees or
whose suggestions and recommendations as to hiring,
firing, advancement, promotion or any other change of
status of other employees are given particular weight.
Exemptions: Executive Employees
35
Executive Exemption: Common Litigation Issues
Management is a duty, but not the primary one.
Employee’s hiring and firing power is purely theoretical.
Employee does not really have much discretion.
Jobs commonly challenged as misclassified exempt
executives:
• Foreman
• Crew Leader or Line Leader
• Assistant Manager
• Shift Manager
• [Insert name of department here] Manager
• [Insert verb or noun here] Supervisor
36
Exemptions: Professional Employees
Professional Employees Are Employees…
Whose primary duty is the performance of work requiring
knowledge of an advanced type (defined as work which is
predominantly intellectual in character, and which includes
work requiring the consistent exercise of discretion and
judgment) in a field of science or learning customarily
acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual
instruction;
or
Whose primary duty is the performance of work requiring
invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized
field of artistic or creative endeavor.
37
Examples of Learned Professionals
Accountants;
Athletic trainers;
Licensed funeral directors and embalmers;
Nurses;
Physician assistants;
Lawyers and Doctors (no salary basis requirement under
FLSA);
Registered or certified medical technologists; and
Paralegals are generally not learned professionals.
38
Professional Exemption: Common Litigation Issues
Degree not necessary for the job
Discretion and judgment (a recurring theme)
Jobs commonly challenged in litigation:
• Junior accountants
• Junior engineers and construction management ee’s
• Social workers
• Paralegals
39
Exemptions: Administrative Exemptions
Administrative Employees Are Employees…
Whose primary duty is the performance of office or non-
manual work directly related to the management or
general business operations of the employer or the
employer’s customers; and
Whose primary duty includes the exercise of discretion and
independent judgment with respect to matters of
significance.
40
Tax
Finance
Accounting
Auditing
Quality Control
Purchasing
Procurement
Advertising
Marketing
Research
Safety and Health
Personnel Management
Human Resources
Employee Benefits
Public Relations
Labor Relations
Government Relations
Insurance
Management or General Business Operations
41
Has authority to formulate, affect, interpret, or implement policies/practices.
Carries out major assignments in conducting the operations of the business.
Performs work that affects business operations to a substantial degree, even if
employee’s assignments are related to a particular segment of the business.
Has authority to commit Company in matters that have significant financial impact.
Has authority to waive or deviate from established policies/procedures without prior
approval.
Has authority to negotiate and bind Company on significant matters.
Provides consultation or expert advice to management.
Involvement in planning long- or short-term business objectives.
Investigates and resolves matters of significance on behalf of management.
Represents Company in handling complaints, arbitrating disputes, or resolving
grievances.
An Exempt Administrative Employee:
42
Administrative Exemption: Common Litigation Issues
Not “directly related to” management or general
operations: production, not “administrative”.
Independent judgment and discretion!
• Evaluating and choosing among different courses of
action.
• Not mere application of skill – even if it’s a great skill.
• Any white-collar business or department.
43
Independent Contractor or Employee? The Fair Labor Standards Act defines an employee as any
individual employed by an employer. 29 U.S.C.
§203(e)(1).
On the other hand, an employer is defined as “any person
acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer
in relation to an employee . . . .” 29 U.S.C. §203(d).
It is clear, therefore, that the FLSA does not cover
independent contractors.
Independent contractor status, however, is not determined
by issuance of 1099s.
Independent Contractor
44
Independent Contractor
Instruction of Worker;
Training;
Integration of Services;
Personal Nature of Services;
Similar Workers;
Cont. Relationship;
Hours of Work
Full Time Work;
Work on Premises;
Order of Performance;
Submitting Reports;
Method of Payment;
Payment of Expenses;
Tools and Materials;
Investment;
Profit or Loss;
Exclusivity of Work;
Available to General Public;
Right to Discharge;
Right to Quit.*
*No one factor is
determinative.
45
Shortened Version - Courts Saleem v. Corp. Transp. Group, Ltd., 854 F.3d 131 (2d Cir.
Apr. 12, 2017) – Focus is on whether, as a matter of
economic reality, the worker is economically dependent
upon the alleged employer or is instead in business for
himself. Five non-exhaustive factors:
(1) the degree of control exercised by the employer over the workers,
(2) the workers' opportunity for profit or loss and their investment in
the business, (3) the degree of skill and independent initiative required
to perform the work, (4) the permanence or duration of the working
relationship, and (5) the extent to which the work is an integral part of
the employerʹs business.
Independent Contractor
46
Summary of Fluctuating Workweek § 778.114(a) DOL
Regulation:
• Requirements:
• Hours of work fluctuate from week to week.
• Salary paid pursuant to “clear mutual understanding of the
parties” that fixed amount is straight time pay for whatever
hours worked in a workweek, whether few or many.
• Salary is sufficient to compensate at a rate not less than
minimum wage for every hour worked.
• Employer pays fixed salary during workweeks when full
schedule of hours is not worked.
• Result:
• Overtime hours paid at one-half regular rate of pay, which varies
from week to week depending on the number of hours worked.
• Theory: OT pay requirement is satisfied because hours over 40
have already been compensated at the straight time rate. 47
Misclassification in Litigation: Remedies
47
Fluctuating Workweek and Misclassification Damages are not the
same thing
• Most circuit courts hold FWW compliance not necessary or
applicable in misclassification cases. See, e.g. Urnikis-Negro v.
Am. Family Prop. Servs., 616 F.3d 665 (7th Cir. Ill. 2010);
Clements v. Serco, Inc., 530 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2008).
• Some district courts have required variation on FWW:
“rebuttable presumption” that salary does not cover all hours.
• Key inquiry is what hours salary “intended to compensate.”
48
Misclassification in Litigation: Remedies
48