Excel Tool Potential Analyse VDA 6.3 2010 En

document.xlsx

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012 Seite 1 von 10

Potential Analysis Report VDA 6.3-2010 Assessment of Quality Capability

Organsiation: Client Date:Supplier No: Reason for Contract: Contract No:

Location:

Pro. Nr. Project, Product, Process Assessed Findings / RequirementsProcess description

Green Fully approved supplier

Yellow Controlled supplierChecks on information provided by supplier

Red Barred supplier

Audit history / Certificates HighlightsAudit basis Date Carried out Result

Areas for Improvement

Participants: Further actions:

Timing for improvement plan:For actions see 'Improvement program' and/or 'Immediate actions'

A contract can be issued for the above project, product

A contract can be issued conditionally for the above project, product

A contract can not be issued for the above project, product

Note: the maximum number of questions not assessed ist limited to 3

Distri-bute to:

document.xlsx


Lead Auditor Co-Auditor signed for organisation

document.xlsx


Explanations

Supplier: Client: Date:

Explanations

Participants: Auditor:

The improvement program was discussed in the final meeting on site and handed over as a draft.. The audited Organisaion is asked to define sustainable corrective actions for the identified weak points and to implement them rapidly.We point out that within the audit the processes only can be checked randomly. Other weak points and / or potentials for imprevement may be possible.It is the responsibility of the audited parties to expand the investigation and necessary measures to similar areas / issues.

B3

Rita Demmeler-Wirth: aus Bericht

G3


L3


document.xlsx


Supplier: Client:

VDAQuestions Potential Analysis P1 Assess-ment Remarks

6.3*

Project management

2.1 1.1

2.2* 1.2

2.3 1.3

2.4 1.4

2.5* 1.5

2.6 1.6

2.7* 1.7

Planning the product & process development

3.1 2.1

3.2* 2.2

Carrying out the product & process development

4.1 3.1

4.5* 3.2

4.9 3.3

Supplier management

5.1* 4.1

5.2 4.2

5.4* 4.3

5.5* 4.4

5.6 4.5

Potential Analysis (P1) as excerpt from VDA 6.3 questionary

Is the project organisation (project management) establshed and are tasks and authorities specified for the project management and teammembers?

Are the necessary resources planned and available for the development of the project and are changes highlighted?

Is there a project plan and has this been agreed with the customer?

Is change management within the project ensured by the project manager?

Is change management within the project ensured by the project manager?

Is there a quality plan in the project ? Is this implemented and regularly monitored for compliance?

Is an escalation process established and is this controlled effectively?

Are the product-specific and process-specific requirements set out?

Is manufacturing feasibility assessed on the basis of the requirements established for the product and process, on a cross-functional level?

Are the Design FMEA / Process FMEA drawn up and up-dated in the course of the project and are corrective actions specified?

Are the necessary demonstrations of suitability and releases available for the relevant phases of the project, based on the requirements?

Is the transfer of the project to full production secure in terms of the product launch?

Are only approved and quality-capable suppliers appointed?

Are the customer's requirements taken into account in the supply chain?

Are the necessary approvals available for out-sourced products and services?

Is the agreed quality of out-sourced products and services guaranteed?

Are incoming goods stored in the appropriate manner?

D3

Rita Demmeler-Wirth: wird aus Bericht übernommen

K3


document.xlsx



6.3*

Process analysis / Production

What goes into the process? Process input

6.1.1* 5.1.1

6.1.3 5.1.2

Work content / process sequence (are all production processes controlled ?)

6.2.1* 5.2.1

6.2.3* 5.2.2

57

6.2.4* 5.2.3

6.2.5 5.2.4

6.2.6 5.2.5

Process support / personnel resources

6.3.2* 5.3.1

Material resources

6.4.1 5.4.1

6.4.2* 5.4.2

6.4.3 5.4.3

6.4.4 5.4.4

Process effectiveness level (Effectivity, Efficency and avoiding waste integrated)

6.5.1 5.5.1

Are targets set for product and process?

6.5.3* 5.5.2

6.5.4* 5.5.3

Are processes and products audited regularly?

What should the process produce ? (process result / output)

6.6.1* 5.6.1

Customer support / customer satisfaction / service

Has the transfer of the project from development to full production been completed?

Are upstream materials stored in the appropriate manner and do the transport methods / packing systems take account of the special characteristics of upstream materials?

Based on the production control plan, are all the relevant data fully listed in the production and test / inspection documentation?

Can the customer's product-specific quality requirements be achieved with the production facilities?

Are significant characteristics controlled in production?

Are scrap, rework and setting parts, as well as residual in-house quantities properly separated and identified?

Is the flow of materials and components secured against mix-ups / incorrect identification?

Are the operators able to carry out their allotted tasks and are their qualifications kept up-to-date?

Are the maintenance and overhaul of machines / facilities controlled on a preventive basis?

Can the quality requirements be monitored effectively with the measurement, checking and inspection equipment used?

Are the work-areas and test / inspection stations suitable for requirements?

Are tools, equipment and test / inspection devices stored appropriately?

If deviations from product and process requirements occur, are the causes analysed and corrective actions checked for effectiveness?

Are the customer's requirements satisfied in terms of product and process?

document.xlsx



6.3*

7.1* 6.1

7.3* 6.2

Is the supply of components secure?

Numbers of classifications / assessments### 0 0 0 [green] requirements fullfilled

[yellow] requirements partly fullfilled

[red] requirments not fullfilled

Number of questions answerded 0 too less assessments

Fully approved supplier max. 7 questions yellow

no question redControlled supplier max. 14 questions yellow

award / nomination governed by defined conditions no questions redBarred supplier more than 14 questions yellow

award / nomitation is not possible 1 and more questions red

Overall ClassificationNote: the maximum number of questions not assessed ist limited to 3

[Green] Requirents are fulfilled The question can be answered in full with yes, there is no potential risk.

[Yellow] Requirements are partly fulfilled

[Red] Requirements are not fulfilled

Notes /Remarks to the classification:

RotGelbGrün

Date / signature auditor Date / sign for organization

Are the customer's requirements satisfied in terms of QM system, product (on delivery) and process?

Nicht bewertete Fragen sind zu begründen. Die Vergleichbarkeit der Ergebnisse bzw. die gegenseitige Anerkennung ist damit nicht mehr gegeben.

Plausibilitäts-prüfung

The question can not be fully answerde with yes, the target (process / product) can be only reached with additionally actions / measures.

The question has to be answerded with no., the target (product / process) is not reached, there is a potenial risk for rejects (Ausfalls).

F97

Rita Demmeler-Wirth: wird automatisch berechnet

F99


F101


F104

Rita Demmeler-Wirth: Automatisch berechnet

document.xlsx


Improvement program VDA 6.3-2010 Date:

Supplier: Client:

To be completed by the auditor To be completed by the audited organisation

Pos. Weaknesses, recommended actions, findings Actions and cause analysis by the organisation Timing Responsib. Effectiveness

Project management

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

Planning the product & process development

2.1

2.2

Carrying out the product & process development

3.1

3.2

3.3

Supplier management

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

Quest Nr.

E2


I2


document.xlsx


To be completed by the auditor To be completed by the audited organisationPo

s. Weaknesses, recommended actions, findings Actions and cause analysis by the organisation Timing Responsib. EffectivenessQuest Nr.

4.5

Process analysis / ProductionWhat goes into the process? Process input

5.1.1

5.1.2Work content / process sequence (are all production processes controlled ?)

5.2.1

5.2.2

5.2.3

5.2.4

5.2.5Process support / personnel resources

5.3.1Material resources

5.4.1

5.4.2

5.4.3

5.4.4Process effectiveness level (Effectivity, Efficency and avoiding waste integrated)

5.5.1

5.5.2

5.5.3What should the process produce ? (process result / output)

5.6.1Customer support / customer satisfaction / service

6.1

6.2

document.xlsx


Time Schedule Applicant / Supplier for Upgrade QualificationSupplier:

Contract No: Date:

Pos. Activites Expected Schedule Date Confirmed Status

1. Improvement program received

2. Timing and detailling of the improvement program 14 days after 1.

3. Realization of improvement program and proof of effectivity 12 weeks after award

4. 12 weeks before SOP

Explanations

Auditor: Signature Supplier/ Tender:

Only at stage 'Green' or 'Yellow', if award is made:Selfassessment according to VDA 6.3

Implementation of measures:The activities must be realized immedeatelly. For large imprvement programs the realization can be subdivided in several realization phases.

Selfassessment: to assess seriously the selfassessment, we ask for information about the audit timing (man days) and the qualitfication of the auditors used. In our opinion the audit timing equates a timing of a certification audit. After receiving and verifying the audit documents we will, if the result is classified as "A", agree our next audit timing. If trhe result is classified as "B" we ask for realistic timing you will achieve an "A" classification. We expect then the ontime sending of the audit report of the internals follow up audit, without any specific request from us.

Agreement of upgrade qualification:Controlled suppliers / tenders commit themselves, after been awarded, to coorperate with an approved consulting company by accpeting the upgrade qualification agreement. Costs will be carried by the supplier.

C2


C3


Disclaimer:

Please note: The exact requirements for each question are provided in the 'Red Book' VDA 6.3!

Status of Changes

Version Nr Comment Date Name1.0 Set up Tool 11/1/2010 R. Demmeler-Wirth

1.1 12/30/2010 R. Demmeler-Wirth






This template is provided free of charge by ORGAImprove to be used by interested parties.The use of this template is within the responsibility of the user and at users risk only!ORGAimprove will not take any responsiblity or liability for any errors e.g. in calculations / evaluations!There is no right of support or delivery of updates by ORGAimprove!

Failure questions (5.2 and 7.3) solved, include column with reference to numbers in '8.1 Overview questionaire'

Correction of assessing achievement (number of questions assessed red / yellow)

Verbesserungen bei der Formatierung,automatisierte BerechnungVerknüpfung Anmerkungen aus Potentialanalyse mit VerbesserungsprogrammEinfügen Time Schedule Qualifikation

Analysis sheet, adjusting calculation (>14 yellow is red not =14 is red), and 3 questions empty is still ok

Corrction entry 6.3.1 --> 6.3.2* (question was ok, only number to be corrected)

Fragebogen Nummern zum Verweis VDA richtig gestellt. (4.1,4.3,4.9, (5.4,5.6,5.7, 6.3.2, ) Fragen waren richtig!Verbesserungsprogramm, fehlenden Link zugefügt

Documents

Excel Tool Potential Analyse VDA 6.3 2010 En