Upload
vankhuong
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evidences of post‐rift compressional tectonics in the North‐Eastern Tyrrhenian Basin.Marco Pastore (1), Giovanni Pezzati (2), Filippo D’Oriano (1), Paola Vannucchi (2), Vincenzo Picotti (1) and Nevio Zitellini (3)
(1) Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy., (2) Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy., (3) ISMAR CNR, Bologna, Italy.
Session: TS6.1/G3.3/GD5.4/SM1.5 ‐ Poster: EGU2011‐8170
Corresp. e‐mail: [email protected]
Line drawing of lines AC38 and AC48,
collected in the Palmarola basin.
The whole sedimentary package is
splitted into two main sequences, A and
B, respectively above and below the “R”
unconformity. See section F for location
(Fig. 7 and 8) and explanation.
LINE AC38 (Fig. 2):
Palmarola basin (landwarth) and
Palmarola high are here showed.
We suggest that two transpressional
faults (fix 15 and 12) have here
reactivated old syn‐rift normal faults,
and that the main compressional event
is marked by the "R" unconformity. On
the high that border the basin (fix
12‐14), uplift appears still active.
LINE AC48 (Fig. 3):
Saddle between two sub‐basins in the
Palmarola basin, with an axis trending
SW‐NE.
The folding of the reflectors under "R"
suggests a reactivation of the previous
syn‐rift faults. This uplift seems not
active now, because sedimentation in
level A is just slightly bend and shows
progressives onlaps just near the
unconformity and not in more recents
reflectors.
Fig. 2: line drawing of the AC38 seismic
profile (Active compressional tectonic).
Fig. 3: line drawing of the AC48 seismic
profile (Inactive compressional tectonic).
AC38
AC48
EVIDENCES OF COMPRESSIONAL TECTONICSC
Legend:
Normal Fault Inverse Fault
Z
"Z" unconformity
(basement)
(Marani et al., 1986)
R
"R" unconformity
(syn ‐ compression)
(Marani and Zitellini, 1986)
Acoustic
sea floor
A
B
Mostly post‐compressional sediment thickness
and displacement (isochronopaches TWT).
Mostly pre‐syn‐compressional sediment thickness
and displacement (isochronopaches TWT).
Ponza isl.Palmarola isl.
Circeo
cape
Sabaudia (LT)
Ponza isl.Palmarola isl.
Sabaudia (LT)
Circeo
cape
Fig. 7: thickness (isochronopaches TWT), sediment distribution and pre‐compressional
tectonic in the Palmarola basin and ridge area.
Fig. 8: thickness (isochronopaches TWT), sediment distribution and syn‐post
compressional tectonic in the Palmarola basin and ridge area.
F INVERSION TECTONICS IN THE PALMAROLA BASIN
Palmarola Ridge Palmarola Ridge
A major unconformity "R" (after Marani and Zitellini, 1986) drawn in the Palmarola basin and ridge, give us the possibility to map the sediment thickness in that area before (Fig. 7) and after it (Fig. 8).
As shown in section C, this "R" marks the main compressional event occurred in this area.
Before "R" (FIg 7) Palmarola basin is not well formed, althoug Palmarola ridge is recognizeable (low sediment are here deposited). Depocenter is located landwarth and filled with sedimens mainly related
to progradation. A saddle between Palmarola ridge and the "H1" structural high shows high sediment thickness.
After "R" (Fig. 8), depocenters are migrated into the Palmarola basin, which is now well recognizeable, and low sediment thickness are present on the saddle previously described.
These changes suggest an uplift of the basement in the northern part of Palmarola ridge and in the saddle: faults bounding the basin are reactivated in compression.
H1 high
8 ms
125 ms
250 ms
375 ms
625 ms
750 ms
500 ms
875 ms
1000 ms
TWTTWT
12 ms
50 ms
100 ms
150 ms
200 ms
250 ms
300 ms
400 ms
450 ms
500 ms
350 ms
LINE AC10 (Fig. 4):
Intraslope basin with a semigraben
structure generated by a normal fault
acting during syn‐rift extensional
tectonic.
Sediments show a wedging feature to
the right, where is located the
depocenter (fix 12).
However, sediments close to the normal
fault are folded and displaced upwards
forming a large anticline.
A reactivation of the previous normal
fault by a compression with sigma‐1
almost parallel to the rifting structure is
here suggested.
Fig. 4: line drawing of the AC10 seismic profile (Syn‐Rif normal fault reactivated as inverse fault).
AC10
D REACTIVATION OF EXTENSIONAL TECTONIC
Fig. 5: isochrones TWT of the "Z" unconformity (beological basement) and location of AC10, AC38
and AC48 seismic lines described in section C. Red square: area analyzed in section F.
Fig. 6: thickness of the plio‐quaternary sedimentation (isochronopaches TWT), and
actual tectonics in the study area.
E BASEMENT MORPHOLOGY AND SEDIMENT THICKNESS IN THE STUDY AREA
Monte Argentari
Palmarola ridge and basin area
Fig. 5: the basement map shows an upper continental slope interrupted by intraslope basins, and followed (to the west) by structural hights that border these peri‐tyrrhenian basins. The axes of positive and
negative structures are mainly oriented NW‐SE, in agreement with the local direction of the Tirrhenian rift.
Fig. 6: in the northern part of the study area the sedimentation is mainly controlled by the basement morphology, whereas in the southern‐west part this relationship is less evident. Sediment thickness above
1000 ms TWT are detected near the coast betw. Anzio and Capo Circeo, west to the Tiber mouth and south to Monte Argentario.
From Monte Argentario to Tiber mouth the main tectonics is related to extensions.
Further south we found inverted structures, both active and inactive, the main of them
are recognized along the structural high that forms the Palmarola ridge.
An enlargement of this area (see red box in Fig. 5) shown in section F, higlights the relation
between the faults systems.
40 ms
250 ms
500 ms
750 ms
1000 ms
1250 ms
TWT200 ms
1000 ms
500 ms
1500 ms
2000 ms
2500 ms
3000 ms
3500 ms
4000 ms
TWT
Inactive normal fault
Active normal fault
Active anticlinal axis
Inactive anticlinal axis
Inactive sinclinal axis
Active sinclinal axis
Active reverse fault
Inactive reverse fault
Isochrones/Isochronopaches
Coastline
Legend:
Fig. 9: active and inactive tectonics found in the study area.
G CONCLUSIONS
A grid of seismic lines in the north‐eastern coast of the Tyrrhenian are analyzed here. As expected, the structural
grain is dominated by syn‐rift extensional faults (most of them appear inactive), tilted blocks and intraslope
basins oriented mainly NW‐SE.
We found evidences of tectonic inversion mainly in the southern part, around the Palmarola ridge and basin.
We recognized in this area a major unconformity "R" that marks the main phase of the compressional event
occurred here. Evidences of ridge uplift with evident migration of depocenter are also present (see section F).
Seismic reflectors, related to progradational sequences are here involved in the intraslope ridge uplift. This give
us a constrain for the age of the beginning of the compressional inversion, which should be younger than the
beginning of the progradation in this area, i.e. 1.5 Ma (Marani et al 1986).
We also found in some areas folded reflectors till the seabed, suggesting that compressions and uplift are still
active.
REFERENCES
Bolis, G., Capelli, V. and Marinelli, M., (1981). “Aeromagnetic data of the Italian area: instrumental to a better
comprehension of the basement main characteristic in Italy”. AGIP‐EAEG (43rd meeting), Venezia.
Civetta, L., Orsi, G., Scandone, P., Pece, R., (1978). “Eastwards migration of Tuscan anatectic magmatism due to
anticlockwise rotation of the Apennines”. Nature, 276, 604‐606.
Faccenna, C., Becker, T. W., Lucente, F. P., Jolivet, L., Rossetti, F., (2001a). “History of subduction and back‐arc extension
in the Central Mediterranean”. Geophys. J. Int., 145, 809‐820.
Faccenna, C., Funiciello, D., Giardini, D., Lucente, F.P., (2001b). “Episodic back‐arc extension during restricted mantle
convention in the central Mediterranean”. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.., 187, 105‐116.
Finetti, I. and Del Ben, A., (1986). “Geophysical study of the Tyrrhenian opening”. Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl., 28, 110, 75–
155.
Funiciello, R. Parotto, M. and Praturlon,A., (1981) Carta tettonica d'Italia 1:1.500.000, Progetto Finalizzato Geodinamica,
C.N.R., Roma (1981).
Kastens, K., et al. (1988). “ODP leg 107 in the Tyrrhenian Sea: Insights into passive margin and back‐arc basin evolution”.
Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. (1988), 100, 1140–1156.
Kastens and J. Mascle, (1990). “The geological evolution of the Tyrrhenian Sea: an introduction to the scientific results of
ODP Leg 107”. Proc. ODP, Sci. Results 107 (1990), pp. 3–26.
Malinverno, A. and Ryan, W. B. F., (1986). “Extension in the Tyrrhenian Sea and shortening in the Apennines as result of
arc migration driven by sinking of the lithosphere”. Tectonics, 5, 227‐245.
Marani, M.P., Gamberi, F., Bortoluzzi, G., Carrara, G., Ligi, M. & Penitenti, D., (2004). Tyrrhenian sea bathymetry, in From
Sea?oor to Deep Mantle: Architecture of the Tyrrhenian Backarc Basin, Vol. 44 of Mem. Descr. Carta Geologica d’Italia, eds.
Marani, M.P., Gamberi, F. & Bonatti, E.,APAT, Roma.
Marani M., Taviani M., Trincardi F., Argnani A., Borsetti A.M. and Zitellini N., (1986). "Pleistocene progradation and
postglacial events of the Tyrrhenian continental shelf between the Tiber river delta and Capo Circeo", Mem. Soc. Geol. It., 36
(1986), 67‐69, 11 ff.
Marani M., Zitellini N., (1986). "Rift structures and wrench tectonics along the continental slope between Civitavecchia and
Capo Circeo". Mem. Soc. Geol. It., 35(1986), 453‐457, 4ff.
Rocchi, S., Westerman, D.S., Dini, A, Innocenti, F., Tonarini, S., (2002). “Two stage growth of leccoliths at Elba Island, Italy”.
Geology, 30, 983‐986.
Sandwell and Smith (2001). “GEBCO Bathymetric compilation”. URL: topex.ucsd.edu/marine_topo/text/topo.html.
Savelli, C. (1988). “Late Oligocene to Recent episodes of magmatism in and around the Tyrrhenian Sea: Implications for the
processes of opening in a young inter‐arc basin of intra‐orogenic (Mediterranean) type”, Tectonophysics, 146, 163 – 181.
Savelli, C. (2002). “Time‐space distribution of magmatic activity in the western Mediterranean and peripheral orogens during
the past 30 Ma (a stimulus to geodynamic considerations)”, J. Geodyn., 34, 99–126.
Selli, R. and Fabbri, A., (1971). “Tyrrhenian: a pliocene deep sea”. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rendiconti Classe Scienze
Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali, 50(5), 580‐592.
Zitellini N., Marani M. and Borsetti M.R., (1984). "Post‐orogenic tectonic evolution of Palmarola and Ventotene basins
(pontine archipelago)". Mem. Soc. Geol. It. 27(1984), 121‐131, 10 ff.
The Tyrrhenian Sea lies in the Mediterranean Sea between Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily and the
Italian Peninsula. It is characterized by a triangular shape and in the area south of the Ponza
Island it is deeper than 3600m.
The Tyrrhenian basin can be subdivided in two main sectors: The Northern Tyrrhenian Sea and
The Southern Tyrrhenian Sea. The two parts of the basin are separated along the 41°N parallel,
where is present a strong magnetic lineation (e.g. Bolis et al., 1981; Finetti and Del Ben, 1986).
The widely accepted model consider the Tyrrhenian Sea as a small back arc basin, connected to
the African (Adria‐Ionian) subducting plate (e.g. Malinverno and Ryan, 1986; Faccenna et al.,
2001a, 2001b), which formation occurred in a compressional framework due to the convergence
between Africa and Eurasia plates.
The Tyrrhenian started to form in the Upper Miocene (10 Ma) (Kastens and Mascle, 1990;
Sartori et al., 2001). Afterwards, the extension migrated to the south‐east, with the formation of
the Vavilov and the Marsili Plain in the Plio‐Pleistocene (Kaestens et al, 1998). The Northern
Tyrrhenian stopped opening in the late Miocene (6‐5 Ma) and active deformation migrated
south‐eastward (Malinverno and Ryan, 1986; Kastens et al., 1988.).
The magmatic activity, ascribed to the extensional processes, points out the migration of the
extension. In the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea, the oldest (15‐13,5 Ma) magmatic event has been
recognized in the Sisco outcrop in the north‐eastern area of Corsica. Eastward, the magmatism is
progressively younger and the youngest events are registered in the Tuscan‐Latial area where
are present the Cimini and Vulsini mountains, the Amiata mount and Larderello (1,2‐0,1 Ma)
(e.g. Civetta et al., 1978; Rocchi et al., 2002).
In the Southern Tyrrhenian, the migration of the extension is associated to the formation of the
Vavilov and to the Marsili volcanoes in the Quaternary (Savelli, 1988; Savelli, 2002).
One of the main characteristic of the Thirrenian passive margin is the presence of “peri‐
tyrrhenian basins” (first described by Selli and Fabbri, 1971), located along the continental slope
of the whole Tyrrhenian basin, separating it in “upper” and “lower”, and where a large amount
of sediments are trapped into.
These basins, formed mainly by syn‐rift extensional tectonic, give us the possibility to recognize
in their sediments the record of deformations occurred after the rift.
In this work we analyzed about 1600 miles of
high‐resolution, near vertical incidence, seismic
profiles collected by ISMAR‐BO during the 80’s
between Monte Argentario (Tuscan Archipelago)
and Cape Circeo (Pontine Islands) in the North‐
Eastern Tyrrhenian basin, supplemented with
about 150 miles of multichannel seismic lines,
collected by AGIP in 1968 and available through
the Italian VIDEPI ministerial project.
We mapped the geological basement, the
sediment thickness and distribution, and their
deformations, in order to understand the syn‐
and post‐rift tectonics, with particular attention
to those deformation structures involving the
post‐rift sequences.
Evidences of “syn‐rift” faults associated to tilted
blocks and basin formation with prevailing
direction NW‐SE are present in the whole area,
but, particularly in the southern part, we found
also anticline and syncline systems trending
approximately parallel to the basement
extensional structures.
Fig. 1: shaded relief of the tyrrhenian sea (data from Marani et al., 2004 and GEBCO) and geological
sketch map of central Italy (modified after Carta Strutturale d’Italia, 1981 ).
Red box: study area; bathymetric and topographic contour interval: 1000m.
A INTRODUCTION B THE TYRRHENIAN SEA
Rome