22
Evidence for Effectiv e Food Security Decision s John Scicchitano USAID/Food For Peace FEWS NET Program Manager Horn of Africa Vegetation Feb 2012 vs. Feb 2011

Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

  • Upload
    natala

  • View
    55

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions. John Scicchitano USAID/Food For Peace FEWS NET Program Manager. Horn of Africa Vegetation Feb 2012 vs. Feb 2011. Geography of food insecurity. Food Security Conditions Somalia March 2012. Magnitude of food insecurity. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Evidencefor

Effective

Food SecurityDecision

s

John ScicchitanoUSAID/Food For Peace

FEWS NET Program Manager

Horn of Africa VegetationFeb 2012 vs. Feb 2011

Page 2: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Geography of food insecurity

2

Food Security ConditionsSomalia

March 2012

Page 3: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Magnitude of food insecurity

33________________________________________

FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK

Ethiopia 2012 Beneficiary Estimates1,2

REGION LOW MID HIGH

AFAR 100,000 120,000 140,000

AMHARA 660,000 780,000 890,000

OROMIA 1,860,000 2,190,000 2,520,000

SNNPR 410,000 490,000 560,000

SOMALI 1,060,000 1,250,000 1,430,000

TIGRAY 360,000 420,000 480,000

OTHER REGIONS(Dire Dawa, Harari, Benishangul

Gumuz, Gambella)90,000 100,000 130,000

TOTAL 4,540,000 5,350,000 6,150,0

00 1 6-month equivalent2 Reflects local population needs only. Does not include refugee needs.

Page 4: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Severity of food insecurity

4

Food Security ConditionsOct-Dec 2011

Page 5: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

5

Integrated Food Security Phase

Classification (IPC)

__________________________________________FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK

 PHASE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION (AREA)

PHASE 1Minimal

Households are able to meet basic food needs and afford essential non-food expenditure without a reliance on coping strategies or humanitarian assistance.

PHASE 2Stressed

For at least 1 in 5 households, food consumption is reduced but minimally adequate without having to engage in unsustainable coping strategies. However, these households are unable to afford some essential non-food expenditures.

PHASE 3Crisis

At least 1 in 5 households face significant food consumption gaps with high or above usual acute malnutrition, or is marginally able to meet minimum food needs only with unsustainable coping strategies such as liquidating livelihood assets.

PHASE 4Emergency

At least 1 in 5 households face extreme food consumption gaps resulting in very high acute malnutrition or excess mortality, or faces extreme loss of livelihood assets that will likely lead to food consumption gaps.

PHASE 5Famine

At least 1 in 5 households have a near complete lack of food and/or other basic needs. Starvation, death, and destitution are evident.

Page 6: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Timing of food insecurity

6

Seasonal ContextSomalia

Page 7: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

7

Page 8: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Inter-Agency Agreement

Inter-Agency Agreement

Contracts Inter-Agency Agreement

Inter-Agency Agreement

27 year-old activity

8

Kimetrica

National, Regional,

Internationalinstitutions

Page 9: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

24 FEWS NET offices

18 Africa - National3 Africa - Regional1 Haiti1 Guatemala1 Afghanistan

Non-presence coverage of others

Nationality of FEWS Field Representatives American = 0 African = 24 Guatemalan = 1 Afghani = 1 Haitian = 1 9

Page 10: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

10

Monitoring prices Understanding how markets function

Page 11: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

11

Structure and Conduct of Markets

Page 12: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Satellite Products

Crop water requirements

satisfaction index (WRSI)

Multiple-source daily rainfall

estimation (RFE)

Vegetation Indices (NDVI)

Page 13: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

www.fews.net

www.fews.net

13

Page 14: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

14

FEWS analyzes historical patterns of change in weather to inform today’s adaptation planning.

Page 15: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

15www.populationexplorer.com

Page 16: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Timor l’Este

1

2

34

A

B

A, B, C = Existing AgMet monitoring focus

1-4 = possible AgMet monitoring windows

C

16

New Agro-Meteorological Monitoring Windows

Page 17: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Excellent Oct-Dec 2011 rains

17

__________________________________________FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK

Source: FEWS NET/NOAA

Horn of Africa - context

Page 18: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

18

__________________________________________FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK

Mar-May 12 rainfall forecasts

Page 19: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

19

Source: FEWS NET/NOAA/USGS

Average March-May rainfall as a percentage of average annual rainfall

Importance of Mar-May rains

__________________________________________FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK

Page 20: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

20

Evolution of Mar-May rains

Precipitation Anomaly:1 Feb – 7 May

Page 21: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

Current Conditions

21

__________________________________________FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK

Source: FEWS NET Ethiopia

Page 22: Evidence for Effective Food Security Decisions

22