Upload
francine-mcgee
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evaluation of HIV specific legal services together with beneficiaries
IDLO – Health Law Program
Asela Kalugampitiya
Health Law Program
Global HIV epidemic
Over 33 million people living with HIV:•Over half are women
2.6 million newly infected in 2009
740,000 people living with HIV in ChinaThe national HIV prevalence is 0.1% Epidemic continues to be driven by high-risk behavior within particular sub- populations
2
• Health Law program
To address national HIV responses to reduce discrimination and increase access to justice, including legal aid for people living with HIV and vulnerable populations
OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID).
Technical support on M&E
The program is implemented in eight developing countries, Benin, Burkina Faso, China, Egypt, Guatemala, Indonesia, Nepal, and Papua New Guinea
IDLO provide technical support to set up a M&E system for the project, to conduct evaluations.
China, Yunnan Province
Yunnan University HIV Legal Aid Center, Kunming
•Legal information and advice
•Peer counseling
•Outreach to drug users
•Lawyers trained for pro bono services
Unique in Yunnan and rare in China – due to close May 2011
6
Mid-term evaluation
Objectives of the evaluation: • To identify what the project stake-
holders achieved during the period to be reviewed
• To identify what worked and gaps in achieving the project objectives
• To make recommendations for year 2 and beyond
Mid-term evaluation
•Key principles:• Local people are active participants, not just sources of information.• Stakeholders evaluate, outsiders facilitate.• The focus is on building stakeholder capacity for analysis and problem solving.
Mid-term evaluation
Evaluation team: Representatives of the stakeholders- Donors- Implementers- the community- Beneficiaries- other service providers- the government
Mid term evaluation
Evaluation process:- Develop the evaluation process/ methodology- Select the evaluation team- Start communication with the team- Share documents to review with the team/ translation- Field work
- Finalize the field work schedule- Data collection through FGDs- Analysis/ presentation to stakeholders
- Dissemination of findings
Mid term evaluation
Evaluation methodology:- Literature review- Data collection from key informants through
FGDsBeneficiaries, implementers, community groups, outreach centers, government, other service providers, donors etc
- Analysis- Presentation to stakeholders- Report writing
Mid term evaluation
Lessons learnt:- Communication process to work with non
evaluators- Empowered evaluation team, whom can be used
for future evaluations- Participatory tools allow more qualitative data- Multi stakeholder team able to collect more
reliable data from their own communities- Participatory evaluation makes easier for
implementation of recommendations
Mid term evaluation
Next steps:- Recommendations were presented to the
implementers- Implementers are in the process of incorporating
recommendations- Final evaluation of the first phase is due in June
2011- Use results for fund raising for the next phase
IDLO Contacts
Thank you very much
Asela Kalugampitiya – [email protected]
International Development Law OrganizationRome, Italy
www.idlo.int/healthlaw