6/2/2011

1

EVALUATIONCRITERIA & REPORTINGMETRICS

School Improvement Grant Monitoring

LEA Review Process

THE SIG MONITORING/REVIEW PROCESS

Data MetricsPhone & In

Person

Instructional Focus Visit

Cash Balance Annual Goals

WISE Transformation

Plan

Interviews

Cash Balance Report

District Guiding

Questions

& Expectations

6/2/2011

2

MONITORING SIGSDE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Instructional Focus Visits

•Classroom Observations•Teacher Interviews•Admin Interviews

Implementation Process

Phone & In-person Interviews

•Quarterly•WISE updates

•Quarterly•Key District/School Leaders•District Guiding Questions

Cash Balance Reports •Quarterly

TIMELINE OF EVALUATION CRITERIA

Month Activity

Aug •Previous Year Final Report•District Guiding Q ti

Month Activity

Feb •CEE Survey

March •Phone InterviewQuestions

Sept •Initial On-site Interview•Revised Annual Goals & Expectations

Oct •Cash Balance Report•Phone Interview

Nov •WISE Updates

March Phone Interview

April •Cash Balance Report•WISE Updates

May •Conclusion On-Site Interview•Classroom Observation Data

June •Metric Data CollectionDec •Mid-year On-site

Interview•Classroom Observation Data

Jan •Cash Balance Report•WISE Updates

July •Cash Balance Report•WISE Updates•Metric Data Collection•SDE Review of SIG

6/2/2011

3

Evidence of Success or

IDAHO TRANSFORMATION MODELDISTRICT GUIDING QUESTIONS

WISE Transformation Toolkit

Implementation of Processes and Activities (Timeline)

Success or Implementation

Toolkit

Leaders & Teachers

Instructional & Support Strategies

Learning Time & Support

School Governance

DISTRICT GUIDING QUESTIONS

Teachers and Leaders

Instructional and Support and Leaders pp

Strategies

Learning Ti d GTime and Support

Governance

13 QUESTIONS TO ASSIST WITH MONITORING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

6/2/2011

4

CEE Survey Data

•Baseline Comparison•Relationship to

Intervention Model

Student Achievement Data•(1st, 5th and 9th months)•Spring ISAT•IRI (if applicable)

Classroom Observation Data•Walkthrough information•Process of

implementation( pp )•PMA (if applicable)•Formative (interim)

Assessment

•Schedule

PROCESS OF REVIEWING ANNUAL GOALS

REPORTING METRICS PURPOSE:

To inform and evaluate the effectiveness of the selected interventions

DATA SOURCES DATA SOURCES: EDFacts (www.ed.gov) State Fiscal Stabilization Funds (SFSF) District

INDICATORS: Achievement Leading Indicators Leading Indicators

DATA CATAGORIES: School Student Outcome/Academic Progress s Student Connection & School Climate Talent

6/2/2011

5

REPORTING METRICS SCHOOL DATA

• Intervention ModelAYP St t• AYP Status

• AYP Targets Met & Missed• School Improvement Status• # of minutes per school year

SDE Responsibility

•# of minutes per school year for reading instruction•# of minutes per school year for math instruction

LEA/School Responsibility

REPORTING METRICS STUDENT OUTCOMES/ACADEMIC PROGRESS

• % at or above proficiency on ISAT in RD/LU/MT

• % participation on ISAT in RD/LU/MT

• Average Scale Score• % ELL proficient on AMAO• Graduation Rate• Dropout Rate• Student Attendance Rate• # & % completing AP/IB

k

SDE Responsibility

coursework

LEA/School Responsibility

6/2/2011

6

REPORTING METRICS STUDENT CONNECTIONS & SCHOOLCLIMATE

• Discipline IncidentsT t• TruantsSDE

Collection

LEA/School Collection

REPORTING METRICS TALENT

• Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEA’s performance level on LEA s teacher evaluation

• Teacher attendance rateSDE

Responsibility

LEA/School Responsibility

6/2/2011

7

Annual Goals

Student Outcomes

DETERMINATION TO RENEW AN LEA’SSIG IF NOT MEETING ANNUAL GOALS

Individual SIG School State

Goals Outcomes

All Student Category and for each sub-group

Individual SIG School

Other SIG Schools

DETERMINATION TO RENEW AN LEA’SSIG IF NOT MEETING ANNUAL GOALS

ACTIONS EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATIONACTIONS

• School’s ability to show improvement

• District’s ability to build capacity in school and district

EVIDENCE

• School’s fidelity to selected intervention model

• Progress of School’s leading indicators

IMPLEMENTATION

• Timeline of implementation

• Effectiveness of implementation

• Sustainability of implementation

SDE will provide district with written summary of its findings.

6/2/2011

8

DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIESBASELINE DATA (SY 2009-2010)DUE AUGUST 1ST, 2011

Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEA’s Teacher Evaluation

(District and School)

Teacher Attendance Rate

(District and School)

Reading Instructional Minutes (School)g ( )

**2009-2010 SY and 2010-2011 SY**

Math Instructional Minutes (School)

**2009-2010 SY and 2010-2011 SY**

REPORTING METRICSBASELINE DATADUE AUGUST 1ST, 2011

District Guiding QuestionsDistrict Guiding Questions

Revised Budget for 2011-2012

WISE Transformation Tool Updated

Baseline District and School Data

Send to Jodie Mills: jmills@sde.idaho.gov

6/2/2011

9

OTHER THINGS!

Letter of Support for REL (Steve)

GRA request for reimbursement (Steve)

Email 1st day of School (Lisa)

Go Fly Fishing (Jodie) Go Fly Fishing (Jodie)

QUESTIONS?

Steve Underwood - Director sunderwood@sde idaho gov sunderwood@sde.idaho.gov 208-332-6922

Jodie Mills - Coordinator jmills@sde.idaho.gov 308-332-6869

Lisa Paul – Administrative Assistant lpaul@sde.idaho.gov 208-332-6942