4
Evaluation and Selection of New Products DSPO April 2019 Dianne Jones Director Process Name: Evaluation and Selection of New Products Review Date: April 2019 Responsible Unit: Lead Trainer and Product Evaluation Team Description: Evaluate new chemicals, equipment and other supplies Input Triggers: Customer Feedback, Changes in Product Specifications, Safety Data Sheets, Manufacturer Literature, Product Samples, Product Performance Reports Finish Line: New product is selected Cycle Time: Based on product Customers: Procurement, Test Site Managers CTO Standards: Clear and timely communication of expectations Performance Measures: NA Performance Capability: NA Performance Period: NA Results: Goal Actual (FY 19) NA NA

Evaluation and Selection of New Products...Evaluation and Selection of New Products DSPO April 2019 Dianne Jones Director Process Name: Evaluation and Selection of New Products Review

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Evaluation and Selection of New Products

    DSPO April 2019 Dianne Jones Director

    Process Name: Evaluation and Selection of New Products

    Review Date: April 2019

    Responsible Unit: Lead Trainer and Product Evaluation Team

    Description: Evaluate new chemicals, equipment and other supplies

    Input Triggers: Customer Feedback, Changes in Product Specifications, Safety Data Sheets, Manufacturer Literature, Product Samples, Product Performance Reports

    Finish Line: New product is selected

    Cycle Time: Based on product

    Customers: Procurement, Test Site Managers

    CTO Standards: Clear and timely communication of expectations

    Performance Measures: NA

    Performance Capability: NA

    Performance Period: NA

    Results: Goal Actual (FY 19)

    NA NA

  • Triggering

    Event

    GUIDES What helps us know why, when, and how we do what we do?

    DSPO Strategic Plan

    State Requirements

    Safety Regulations

    Budget

    LEED

    END

    INPUT What do we need to do this?

    OUTPUT What do we produce or deliver?

    Customer Feedback

    Changes in Product Specifications

    Safety Data Sheets

    Manufacturer Literature

    Product Samples

    Product Performance Report

    Evaluation

    and Selection

    of New Products

    Customer Satisfaction

    Effective/Efficient Work

    Processes

    Increased Value

    Bid Specifications

    “Greener” Products DSPO KEY PROCESSES

    ENABLERS

    Environmental Services System-wide Safety Programs

    Quality Assurance

    Financial

    Monitoring

    Workforce Excellence

    Customer

    Satisfaction

    Supply & Property Management

    Procurement

    Budget

    Vendors

  • Division of School Plant Operations

    Evaluation and Selection of New Products

    Review Date Process Owner Customers Critical to Quality Measures

    April, 2019 Lead Trainer and Product Evaluation Team

    Procurement Test site managers

    Clear and timely communication of expectations

    Customer satisfaction survey results

    Background: The DSPO evaluates new chemicals, equipment and other supplies in response to customer

    feedback, changes in industry and product standards, regulatory requirements, etc.

    1. Product Evaluation Team (PET consists of trainers, ERS rep, BSS, school staff rep) does product research

    (gathering and reviewing manufacturer literature including SDS, checking references, etc.)

    2. Merit Review?

    3. Is it a chemical?

    4. Send Safety Data Sheet to Environmental Services for review and approval for use in schools

    5. Is it approved?

    6. PET identifies testing sites

    7. PET develops evaluation criteria for product testing

    8. PET sends following information to Procurement.

    a. Criteria should include how product will be judged, i.e. quality, cost, green features, packaging,

    ease of use, etc.

    b. Length of test

    i. Equipment - 20 work days

    ii. Supplies - minimum of 3 months

    iii. Floor finish or sealer – 1 year

    c. Amount of product vendor is required to provide for the test

    d. Where and when product is to be delivered

    9. Procurement invites vendors to participate in the test.

    10. PET communicates evaluation process and expectations to BSMs of the test sites “regarding”:

    • Building Service Manager Reports (from each testing site)

    • Equipment/Supply Evaluation Forms

    o Anyone who operated equipment or used supplies completes evaluation form.

    • Feedback from others (observations)

    o Building Service Supervisors

    o PET members

    o Location staff members

    Administration

    School Staff

    11. Test site BSMs receive equipment or supplies for testing.

    12. Test site BSMs receive training for proper usage of equipment and supplies to testing sites.

    13. Test site conduct the test.

    14. Test site BSMs submit evaluation reports at the end of the testing period.

    15. PET evaluates test results

    16. Is product recommendable?

    17. PET prepares report of recommendation and send to director.

    18. PET presents recommendations to DSPO leadership team and receives any additional feedback.

    19. Director of School Plant Operations sends the final approved equipment or supply specification to

    procurement for bid.

    20. Procurement issues solicitation for new product

  • Envi

    ron

    men

    tal

    Serv

    ice

    s/IA

    Q

    Test

    ing

    Site

    P

    rocu

    rem

    ent

    Div

    isio

    n o

    f Sc

    ho

    ol P

    lan

    t O

    pe

    rati

    on

    s (D

    SPO

    )

    Division of School Plant Operations: Evaluation and Selection of New Products

    Need for new product received

    (1) Product Evaluation

    Team (PET) does research

    END

    No

    (2)

    Does product merit testing?

    Yes No

    (3)

    (6)

    PET identifies testing locations

    (15)

    (7)

    PET develops evaluation criteria

    and test specifications

    (16)

    (17)

    PET prepares

    (8) PET sends test

    criteria to Procurement

    (10) PET Communicates

    test process to BSMs of test sites

    Is product a chemical?

    PET evaluates test results

    Is product recommend

    ed?

    Yes recommendation report for director

    Yes

    Yes

    (19)

    No

    END

    (18) Director sends final recommendation to

    Procurement

    PET presents recommendation to

    DSPO leadership team

    (4) Evaluate SDS for

    safe use

    (5)

    Is product approved

    No END

    (20) Issue solicitation for

    new product

    END

    (9) Issue invitation to

    vendors to participate in test

    (13) Test site BSMs

    submit evaluation reports to PET

    (13)

    Test site conducts the test

    (12) Test site BSMs receive training from vendor for

    proper usage

    (11)

    Test site BSMs receive product for

    testing

    SPO\Process Documents and Performance Measurements\Organizational Effectivement\Pro Docs Eval and Select New Products 2019