Evaluation and Analysis of Data

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Evaluation and Analysis of Data

    1/4

    Rohan Joshi

    Mr. Kilpatrick

    IB1 Physics B3

    13 October 2014

    Physics Cart Lab

    Analysis:

    These are the graphs from which we determined our conclusions. These are also the graphs

    which contain our 3 different data analyses.

    A v. M

    This graph shows the relation between mass and acceleration. These values were both taken

    directly from the lab, and simply graphed.

  • 8/10/2019 Evaluation and Analysis of Data

    2/4

    log(a) v log(m)

    This is the linearized data.

    A v. 1/m

  • 8/10/2019 Evaluation and Analysis of Data

    3/4

    In these graphs, we initially graphed acceleration versus mass in order to find the relationship

    between both. In order to get a linear trend, we then took the log of both acceleration and mass

    and then graphed the log (acceleration) versus the log (mass), which finally linearized the data.

    In order to show the relationship between them both, we them graphed Acceleration versus the

    inverse of mass.

    Mass (kg)

    0.002

    Acceleration (ms-2)

    T1 T2 T3 Avg.

    0.521 0.5118 0.5340 0.5120 0.5193 0.0111

    1.521 0.1678 0.1812 0.1697 0.1729 0.0067

    1.669 0.1286 0.1402 --------- 0.1344 0.0058

    1.866 0.1401 0.1427 0.1434 0.1421 0.0017

    2.866 0.0614 0.0641 0.0627 0.0627 0.0014

    This is the final data table which shows the mass of the cart and then the acceleration which it

    showed. In order to collect this data, we used the Video Analysis part of Logger Pro and created

    points on which it could track and take the data for us.

    Evaluation:

    There were many limitations that could have halted our results from being perfect. The

    first was the timing of when the car finally reached the end of the track, which could have

    skewed the average acceleration. After that when we were measuring the weights, although they

    were already written on their, some of them were hollow and contained space for metal beads

    which gave the weight; weight! If some of these metal beads were not in the container, then the

    weight of the cart could be partially messed up. Other than that, maybe when we were tracking

    the cart on logger pro we may have missed the ball by a few marks.

    In order to improve this lab, the first thing that we could have obviously done was taken

    more experiments. Unfortunately, we did have a time constraint, and did not have a large amount

    of time (which was fine). Also, maybe using consistent types of weights and a much more

    precise ruler could have helped. Since the weights as I stated above were a little bit varied, using

    the same type that were all metal would have made the data much more consistent. Also, the

    meter stick in the background may have been tilted or angled, and may not have given a true

    impression of what exactly the meter was (on the video analysis).

    In order to find the relationship Fnet = MA, we had to find the inverse of mass. Finding

    the inverse of the mass showed that the relationship between the net force and the mass times the

  • 8/10/2019 Evaluation and Analysis of Data

    4/4

    acceleration was inversely proportional. This can also be proved by what exactly a Newton of

    force is:

    Also, since Newtons formula F = ma can also be re written to equal acceleration like so:

    So, in order to get to this step it is necessary to multiply the force (net) by m-1

    or simply

    1/m. The third graph that we plotted is simply doing this with the linearized data, and is the clear

    evidence of this relationship. This finally shows that the larger the force on the smaller mass of

    something leads to more acceleration being applied. The smaller the force on the more massive

    of the object leads to less acceleration being applied to the object.