Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CANDIDATE NAME: Joel Blustein
CASE NUMBER:
Year:2010
WBLO 01
EUROPEAN SOCIETYOF LINGUAL
ORTHODONTISTS
NAME:Talia Nisim
BORN: 23/4/78
SEX: F
PRETREATMENT RECORDS:
CLASSIFICATION: Angle class 2/1 subdivision
TEETH MISSING BEFORE TREATMENT:
APPLIANCE: incognito upper and lower
TREATMENT STARTED:
TREATMENT ENDED:
ACTIVE TREATMENT TIME: 24 months
POSTTREATMENT RECORDS:
RETAINERS:
RETENTION ENDED:
AGE:28-5
RETENTION TIME:
(POST-) RETENTION RECORDS:
TIME OUT OF RETENTION:
DATE: sept 2006
AGE: 28-5 DATE: oct. 2006
AGE: 30-6 DATE:october 2008
a)upper: hawley
a)lower: fixed
a)Upper continue:
a)Lower fixed:
DATE: nov. 2008
DATE:
AGE: DATE:
WBLO 02
RÉSUMÉ OF CASE 4RÉSUMÉ OF CASE 4
CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSIONCASE CATEGORY:
HIGH FRANKFORT MANDIBULAR PLANE ANGLE, MINIMUM
FM ANGLE OF 30° AND/OR SN TO Go-Gn ANGLE OF 37°
DIAGNOSTIC DESCRIPTION
OF THE MALOCCLUSION
DIAGNOSTIC DESCRIPTION
OF THE MALOCCLUSION
A. SUMMARY
28 y old female, Angle class 2/1 subdivision left, lower incisor crowding
Tooth 22 after apicectomy, crown on #24, decalcification spot on #31.
narrow and elongated dental arches, incomplete overbite
B. EXAMINATION OF HEAD AND FACE
C. FUNCTIONAL EXAMINATION
D. INTRAORAL EXAMINATION
E. DENTAL CASTS
Mandibular arch: moderate incisor crowding
Maxillary arch: mild incisor crowding
Occlusion Sagittal: Angle class 1 right side, Angle class 2 left side
Occlusion Vertical: incomplete overbite
Occlusion Transversal: lingual and palatal inclination of posterior segments i
in both arches
Dolichofacial face
Convex, small nasolabial angle
Good pogonion
-No functional shift, solid buccal occlusion
- no TMJ symptoms
Overjet: 8 mm, Overbite: 3 mm
Lower midline shifted to the left
Large amount of restorations
WBLO 03
CANDIDATE NUMBER: DATE: AGE:CASE NUMBER:
FRONTAL 45°
PROFILE
WBLO 04
FACIAL PHOTOGRAPHS BEFORE TREATMENTCANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: sept 2006 AGE: 28-5
FRONTAL smile
DATE: sept 2006 AGE: 28-5CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER:
Right Buccal Left Buccal
CenterUpper Occlusal Lower Occlusal
WBLO 05
INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OCCLUSION BEFORE TREATMENT
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: sept 2006 AGE: 28-5
WBLO 06
LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH BEFORE TREATMENT
Print on transparent support
WBLO 07
TRACING OF LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPHBEFORE TREATMENT
Print on transparent support
Pre-treatment
Mean SD
Sagittal Skeletal
Maxillary PositionS-N-A
76 82º ±3.5º
Mandibular PositionS-N-Pg
73 80º ± 3.5º
Sagittal Jaw RelationA-N-Pg
5 2º ± 2.5º
Vertical Skeletal
Relations
Maxillary InclinationS-N/ANS-
PNS
10 8º ± 3.0º
Mandibular Inlination
S-N/Go-Gn
40 33º ± 2.5º
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 1
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 1
WBLO 08
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: sept 2006 AGE: 28-5
Pre-treatment
Mean SD
Vertical Jaw Relation
ANS-PNS/Go-Gn
30
25º ± 6.0º
Dento-Basal
Relations
Maxillary Incisor
Inclination1-ANS-PNS
116
110º ± 6.0º
Mandibular Incisor
Inclination1-Go-Gn
9194º ± 7.0º
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 1
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 1
WBLO 08-1
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: sept 2006 AGE: 28-5
Mandibular Incisor
Compensation1 –A-Pg (mm) 0
2 ± 2.0
Dental Relations
Overjet (mm) 8 2º ± 2.0
Overbite (mm) 3 2 ± 2.5
Interincisal Angle
1/1
121132º ± 6.0º
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 1
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 1
WBLO 08-2
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: sept 2006 AGE: 28-5
PERIAPICAL OR PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS
BEFORE TREATMENT
WBLO 09
Print on transparent support
RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
BEFORE TREATMENT
RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
BEFORE TREATMENT
A. INTRAORAL / PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH
- Missing #38, all other 3rd molars erupted
- #24: root canal tx
#22 : root canal tx & apicectomy
No pathologies in TMJ
B. INTERPRETATION OF CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESSMENT
WBLO 11
Good skeletal relations in sagittal plane
Hyperdivergent skeletal pattern, high mandibular plane angle
Good position of lower incisor, proclination of upper incisor
Good soft-tissue and hard-tissue pogonion
CANDIDATE NUMBER: DATE: sept 2006 AGE:28-5CASE NUMBER:
TREATMENT PLAN
AND THE REASON FOR IT
TREATMENT PLAN
AND THE REASON FOR IT
Plan:
-Extraction of teeth 14,24,44 to correct overjet and lower midline shift.
- decided not to extract #34, to prevent over-retraction of lower incisors
and make the mechanics easier [leave solid molar relations in left side][.
Occlusal goals:
-Leave molar relations on left side, and reach Angle class 1 relations
on right side
-Acheive canine Angle class 1 relations on both sides.
-Get ovoid shape on both arches.
- correct lower midline, reach good overbite and overjet.
Mechanics:
-Class 1 mechanics on right side, class 2 mechanics on left side
- control upper incisor torque as possible.
WBLO 12
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: sept 2006 AGE:28-5
Right Buccal Left Buccal
CenterUpper Occlusal Lower Occlusal
INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OCCLUSION -bonding
WBLO 12-1
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: oct 2006 AGE:28-6
Right Buccal Left Buccal
CenterUpper Occlusal Lower Occlusal
INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OCCLUSION -9 months in treatment
WBLO 12-1
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE:july 2007 AGE:29-3
Right Buccal
CenterLower Occlusal
Left Buccal
Upper Occlusal
INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OCCLUSION – 18 months in treatment
WBLO 12-1
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE:april 2008 AGE:30-0
Right Buccal Left Buccal
CenterUpper Occlusal Lower Occlusal
INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE OCCLUSION – 24 months in treatment
WBLO 12-2
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: oct 2008 AGE: 30-6
RÉSUMÉ OF THE TREATMENT CARRIED OUT
INCLUDING
ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED
RÉSUMÉ OF THE TREATMENT CARRIED OUT
INCLUDING
ANY DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED
9.2006: Bonding of upper arch, niti 016
10.2006: Bonding of lower arch, niti 016
11.2006: upper arch niti 016x022,
2.2007: upper arch s.s. 016x022, lower arch niti 016x022
3.2007: lower arch s.s. 016x022
5.2007: start class 2 elastics, chain on lower-right
to shift the midline
10.2007: chains both arches. problem : torque spring on #31
[labial crown torque]
1.2008: problem: need to burn anchorage on left side- class 3 elastics on left side
class 2 elastics on right side.
4.2008- 8.2008: problems: 1. opening of the bite in posterior segments.
buttons on buccal aspects and vertical elastics to settle the bite.
2. incisal edge alignment of #31 occurs with over-torque of #31-
took out torque spring.
6.2008: problems: 1. loss of anterior torque- upper arch TMA 017x025
2. crossbite 1st and 2nd molars right side- cross elastics.
10.2008: debonding, 2 essix aplliances. Sent to restore #22 and #25.
2.2009: fixed lower retainer.
WBLO 13
CANDIDATE NUMBER: DATE: AGE:CASE NUMBER:
FRONTAL 45°
PROFILE
WBLO 14
FACIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: feb 2009 AGE: 30-10
FRONTAL smile after treatment FRONTAL smile after restoring 22, 25
CANDIDATE NUMBER: DATE: feb 2009 AGE: 30-10CASE NUMBER:
Right Buccal Left Buccal
CenterUpper Occlusal Lower Occlusal
INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THEOCCLUSION AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
WBLO 15
CANDIDATE NUMBER: DATE: feb 2009 AGE: 30-10CASE NUMBER:
Right Buccal Left Buccal
CenterUpper Occlusal Lower Occlusal
INTRA-ORAL COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THEOCCLUSION after restoring 22, 25
WBLO 15
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: june 2009 AGE: 31-2
LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH
AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
WBLO 16
Print on transparent support
TRACING OF LATERAL SKULL RADIOGRAPH
AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
WBLO 17
Print on transparent support
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
73
69
2
10
Mean SD
Sagittal Skeleatal
Maxillary PositionS-N-A
76 82º ±3.5º
Mandibular PositionS-N-Pg
73 80º ± 3.5º
Sagittal Jaw RelationA-N-Pg
5 2º ± 2.5º
Vertical Skeletal
Relations
Maxillary InclinationS-N/ANS-
PNS
10 8º ± 3.0º
Mandibular Inlination
S-N/Go-Gn
40 45 33º ± 2.5º
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 2
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 2
WBLO 18
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: june 2009 AGE: 31-2
Pre-treatment
Post -treatment
Mean SD
Vertical Jaw Relation
ANS-PNS/Go-Gn
30 35
25º ± 6.0º
Dento-Basal
Relations
Maxillary Incisor
Inclination1-ANS-PNS
116 102
110º ± 6.0º
Mandibular Incisor
Inclination1-Go-Gn
91 9294º ± 7.0º
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 2
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 2
WBLO 18-1
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: june 2009 AGE: 31-2
Mandibular Incisor
Compensation1 –A-Pg (mm)
Pre-treatment
0
Post –treatment
22 ± 2.0
Dental Relations
Overjet (mm) 8 3 2º ± 2.0
Overbite (mm) 3 3 2 ± 2.5
Interincisal Angle
1/1
121 132132º ± 6.0º
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 2
CEPHALOMETRIC MORPHOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENT 2
WBLO 18-2
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: june 2009 AGE: 31-2
PERIAPICAL OR PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHS
AT COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
WBLO 19
Print on transparent support
RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS AT
COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS AT
COMPLETION OF TREATMENT
A. INTRAORAL / PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH
Good root parallelism of teeth near extraction sites
Normal blunting of root apices, no change around apex of #22
Shortening of distal root #36.
B. INTERPRETATION OF CEPHALOMETRIC ASSESSMENT
Posterior rotation of mandible
Retroclination of upper incisors
Good control of lower incisors
WBLO 20
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: june 2009 AGE: 31-2
DESCRIPTION OF THE
TREATMENT RESULT
DESCRIPTION OF THE
TREATMENT RESULT
Dental :
- Coordinated arches, ovoid shape
-Angle class 2 molar relations on left side, Angle class 1
on right side. Angle class 1 on canines both sides
-Dental midlines coincide, good overbite and overjet.
- upper incisor torque is similar to the set-up.
- Difference in crown torque of #31 and others- probably
crown-root dilaceration [shown and explained in during-treatment-
photos].
Facial:
-Smile line and width improved, profile is more straight
-Remarks:
-Loss of some upper lip support
- upper incisors did not get enough torque despite full-size
archwire. May be related to occlusal plane
rotation during treatment.
WBLO 21
CANDIDATE NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: DATE: june 2009 AGE: 31-2