1
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 83, 039907(E) (2011) Erratum: Squeezing the collective spin of a dilute atomic ensemble by cavity feedback [Phys. Rev. A 81, 021804(R) (2010)] Monika H. Schleier-Smith, Ian D. Leroux, and Vladan Vuleti´ c (Received 2 March 2011; published 28 March 2011) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.039907 PACS number(s): 42.50.Dv, 06.20.f, 32.80.Qk, 42.50.Lc, 99.10.Cd An error in our expression for ˜ S + (second column of page 2) led us to miscalculate by a factor of 2 the spin variance due to photon shot noise. The correction of this error alters numerical factors but does not affect the conclusions of the paper. We should have defined ˜ S + S + (t )e i Re[f 1 (0)]t , and thus Eqs. (7)–(11) should read ˜ S + β = e Q/(2S) e iQS z /S S + (0), (7) ˜ S 2 + β = e (2+i )Q/S e 2iQS z /S S 2 + (0), (8) ˜ S 2 y = S 2 2 + S 4 S 2 2 S 4 e 2Q/S G S (Q), (9) ˜ S y S z + S z ˜ S y = (2S 2 S )e Q/(2S) sin Q 2S G S (Q/2), (10) and ˜ S 2 y S 2 ( 1 + 2Q + Q 2 ) . (11) The second term in Eq. (11) indicates the spin variance QS due to photon shot noise, twice the value given in our original publication. Although the numerical prefactors in subsequent expres- sions are of little consequence, we correct them here for completeness: σ 2 α 0 2/Q + Q 4 /(24S 2 ), σ α 0 σ α 0 +π/2 2Q, Q curv = 12 1/5 S 2/5 , σ 2 curv = (5/2)12 1/5 S 2/5 , σ 2 α 0 ,r 2 Q + Q 3 = 1 2Sηr + 4r 3 , Q scatt = 6Sη, σ 2 α 0 ,r | Q=Q scatt = 8/(3), r opt = 3/(8). The corrected version of Fig. 2 still indicates substantial squeezing, and the caption is unchanged. 0 50 100 150 200 0.01 0.1 1 Q σ α 0 2 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 FIG. 2. (Color online) Minimum normalized variance σ 2 α 0 ,r as a function of shearing strength Q for S = 10 4 and various single-atom cooperativities η = 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 (solid lines). The dashed line shows the limit σ 2 curv due to the curvature of the Bloch sphere when free-space scattering is ignored. The dotted line shows the variance neglecting both free-space scattering and curvature, scaling as 1/Q for Q 1. 039907-1 1050-2947/2011/83(3)/039907(1) ©2011 American Physical Society

Erratum: Squeezing the collective spin of a dilute atomic ensemble by cavity feedback [Phys. Rev. A 81 , 021804(R) (2010)]

  • Upload
    vladan

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Erratum: Squeezing the collective spin of a dilute atomic ensemble by cavity feedback [Phys. Rev. A               81               , 021804(R) (2010)]

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 83, 039907(E) (2011)

Erratum: Squeezing the collective spin of a dilute atomic ensemble by cavity feedback[Phys. Rev. A 81, 021804(R) (2010)]

Monika H. Schleier-Smith, Ian D. Leroux, and Vladan Vuletic(Received 2 March 2011; published 28 March 2011)

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.039907 PACS number(s): 42.50.Dv, 06.20.−f, 32.80.Qk, 42.50.Lc, 99.10.Cd

An error in our expression for S+ (second column of page 2)led us to miscalculate by a factor of 2 the spin variance due tophoton shot noise. The correction of this error alters numericalfactors but does not affect the conclusions of the paper.

We should have defined S+ ≡ S+(t)e−iRe[f1(0)]t , and thusEqs. (7)–(11) should read

〈S+〉β = e−Q/(2S)eiQSz/SS+(0), (7)

〈S2+〉β = e−(2+i)Q/Se2iQSz/SS2

+(0), (8)

�S2y = S2

2+ S

4−

(S2

2− S

4

)e−2Q/SGS(Q), (9)

〈SySz + SzSy〉 = (2S2 − S)e−Q/(2S) sin

(Q

2S

)GS(Q/2),

(10)

and

�S2y ≈ S

2

(1 + 2Q + Q2

). (11)

The second term in Eq. (11) indicates the spin variance QS

due to photon shot noise, twice the value given in our originalpublication.

Although the numerical prefactors in subsequent expres-sions are of little consequence, we correct them here forcompleteness:

σ 2α0

≈ 2/Q + Q4/(24S2),

σα0σα0+π/2 ≈√

2Q,

Qcurv = 121/5S2/5,

σ 2curv = (5/2)12−1/5S−2/5,

σ 2α0,r

≈(

2

Q+ Q

3Sη

)=

(1

2Sηr+ 4r

3

),

Qscatt =√

6Sη,

σ 2α0,r

|Q=Qscatt =√

8/(3Sη),

ropt =√

3/(8Sη).

The corrected version of Fig. 2 still indicates substantialsqueezing, and the caption is unchanged.

0 50 100 150 2000.01

0.1

1

Q

σα

0

20.001

0.01

0.11

FIG. 2. (Color online) Minimum normalized variance σ 2α0,r as a

function of shearing strength Q for S = 104 and various single-atomcooperativities η = 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 (solid lines). The dashed lineshows the limit σ 2

curv due to the curvature of the Bloch sphere whenfree-space scattering is ignored. The dotted line shows the varianceneglecting both free-space scattering and curvature, scaling as 1/Q

for Q � 1.

039907-11050-2947/2011/83(3)/039907(1) ©2011 American Physical Society