1
PHYSICAL REVIEW B 83, 099901(E) (2011) Erratum: Direct measurement of spin correlations using magnetostriction [Phys. Rev. B 77, 020404(R) (2008)] Franziska Weickert, Robert K¨ uchler, Vivien Zapf, Marcelo Jaime, and Amando Paduan-Filho (Received 7 February 2011; published 2 March 2011) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.099901 PACS number(s): 75.30.Et, 74.25.Ha, 75.10.Jm, 99.10.Cd We discovered a non-negligible systematic error in the measurements of the magnetostriction along the crystallo- graphic a axis (H c,L a) in NiCl 2 -4SC(NH 2 ) 2 (DTN). It turned out that the measurements performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Tallahassee, Florida, with a capacitive dilatometer were accompanied by a significant magnetic torque effect due to motion of the screw on which the sample sits, which dominated the experimental results. In Fig. 1, the correct data (black curve) taken with a second dilatometer cell at the Max- Planck-Institute in Dresden, Germany, for 60 mK tem- perature in magnetic fields up to 10 T are shown in comparison with the incorrect data previously taken at 42 mK (red dashed line). We also checked the exper- imental results along the other crystallographic direction (H c L) in the Tallahassee cell for the same sam- ple, with the torque problem corrected, and with a dif- ferent sample of DTN in Dresden. All the data agree, so the original (H c L) data are correct. These re- sults are also displayed in Fig. 1, where the origi- nal data (blue line at 27 mK) is compared to Dres- den data (green crosses at 93 mK) in magnetic fields up to 4 T. We confirmed by measurements performed at different temperatures (data not shown) that the magne- tostriction versus magnetic field does not change much below 100 mK and that the comparison of the data is appropriate. All conclusions of the previous publication are deduced from the experimental observations for L c. The corrections 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 L ll c 93 mK 42 mK L ll c L ll a L ll a ΔL/L (%) μ 0 H (T) H ll c DTN 60 mK 27 mK incorrect data correct data FIG. 1. (Color online) Normalized percentage length change 100L/L as a function of magnetic field measured along the crystallographic c and a axes in NiCl 2 -4SC(NH 2 ) 2 for temperatures below 100 mK. The blue line and green cross curve were taken with two different dilatometer cells for L c at 27 and 93 mK, respectively. Both measurements show a perfect analogousness up to 4 T. The incorrect data measured along L a (dashed red line) at 42 mK deviate significantly from the correct results (black line) obtained at 60 mK. for L a presented in this Erratum do not affect the validity of the paper. All conclusions remain scientifically correct. 099901-1 1098-0121/2011/83(9)/099901(1) ©2011 American Physical Society

Erratum: Direct measurement of spin correlations using magnetostriction [Phys. Rev. B. 77 , 020404(R) (2008)]

  • Upload
    amando

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Erratum: Direct measurement of spin correlations using magnetostriction [Phys. Rev. B.               77               , 020404(R) (2008)]

PHYSICAL REVIEW B 83, 099901(E) (2011)

Erratum: Direct measurement of spin correlations using magnetostriction[Phys. Rev. B 77, 020404(R) (2008)]

Franziska Weickert, Robert Kuchler, Vivien Zapf, Marcelo Jaime, and Amando Paduan-Filho(Received 7 February 2011; published 2 March 2011)

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.099901 PACS number(s): 75.30.Et, 74.25.Ha, 75.10.Jm, 99.10.Cd

We discovered a non-negligible systematic error in themeasurements of the magnetostriction along the crystallo-graphic a axis (H ‖ c,L ‖ a) in NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2 (DTN).It turned out that the measurements performed at theNational High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Tallahassee,Florida, with a capacitive dilatometer were accompaniedby a significant magnetic torque effect due to motion ofthe screw on which the sample sits, which dominated theexperimental results. In Fig. 1, the correct data (blackcurve) taken with a second dilatometer cell at the Max-Planck-Institute in Dresden, Germany, for 60 mK tem-perature in magnetic fields up to 10 T are shown incomparison with the incorrect data previously taken at42 mK (red dashed line). We also checked the exper-imental results along the other crystallographic direction(H ‖ c ‖ L) in the Tallahassee cell for the same sam-ple, with the torque problem corrected, and with a dif-ferent sample of DTN in Dresden. All the data agree,so the original (H ‖ c ‖ L) data are correct. These re-sults are also displayed in Fig. 1, where the origi-nal data (blue line at 27 mK) is compared to Dres-den data (green crosses at 93 mK) in magnetic fieldsup to 4 T. We confirmed by measurements performed atdifferent temperatures (data not shown) that the magne-tostriction versus magnetic field does not change muchbelow 100 mK and that the comparison of the data isappropriate.

All conclusions of the previous publication are deducedfrom the experimental observations for L ‖ c. The corrections

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-0.01

0.00

0.01

0.02

L ll c93 mK

42 mK

L ll c

L ll a

L ll a

ΔL/L

(%

)

μ0H (T)

H ll c

DTN

60 mK

27 mK

incorrect data

correct data

FIG. 1. (Color online) Normalized percentage length change100�L/L as a function of magnetic field measured along thecrystallographic c and a axes in NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2 for temperaturesbelow 100 mK. The blue line and green cross curve were takenwith two different dilatometer cells for L ‖ c at 27 and 93 mK,respectively. Both measurements show a perfect analogousness upto 4 T. The incorrect data measured along L ‖ a (dashed red line)at 42 mK deviate significantly from the correct results (black line)obtained at 60 mK.

for L ‖ a presented in this Erratum do not affect the validityof the paper. All conclusions remain scientifically correct.

099901-11098-0121/2011/83(9)/099901(1) ©2011 American Physical Society