Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effectiveness of Relaxation Training for Anxiety and Depression in Family Caregivers of Long-term Stroke
Survivors
Jenny Csecs
Submitted for the Degree of
Doctor of Psychology(Clinical Psychology)
School of PsychologyFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences
University of SurreyGuildford, SurreyUnited KingdomSeptember 2019
1
Major Research Project (MRP) Empirical Paper Abstract
Objectives: Anxiety and depression are commonly experienced by caregivers of
stroke survivors. However, interventions which directly target mood are limited and
no recommendations for treatment of anxiety and depression of caregivers of stroke
survivors currently exist. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of self-help
relaxation training for anxiety, depression and coping in caregivers of stroke
survivors. Additional aims were to explore whether participants followed the
proposed structure of the relaxation training and whether their experience replicated
effects other populations have reported in the literature in relation to using relaxation
training. Method: This mixed methods study adopted a repeated measures within-
participant design assessing anxiety, depression and coping at three time points (Pre-
1, Pre-2 and Post; N = 18 caregivers of stroke survivors). Post-intervention, semi-
structured interview data were also collected and analysed using deductive thematic
analysis. Results: Quantitative outcome measures showed significant improvement
post-intervention in anxiety, depression and coping in relation to managing stress.
Managing Events/Problem-solving and Managing Perceptions/Meanings coping
scores showed no significant change post-intervention. Qualitative data supported the
quantitative findings, and suggested that participants generally followed the proposed
structure of the relaxation training and reported similar effects as found in the
literature. Conclusions: This study supports the use of self-help relaxation training for
caregivers of stroke survivors in terms of relieving anxiety and depression. Follow-up
research is required to assess whether the effects are maintained and to determine
whether there are factors which could influence the likelihood of change.
Key words: stroke caregivers, anxiety, depression, relaxation training
2
Acknowledgements
Firstly, thank you to Dr. Hannah Thompson for all of your support and guidance
throughout my research project. I greatly appreciate how much you believed in my
idea from the beginning and wholly supported me to bring it to fruition. Thank you
also to Dr. Laura Simonds for your thoughtful contributions throughout this piece of
work, for providing much needed clarity whenever needed and for helping me to
continue enjoying the process of completing my thesis.
To all of the caregivers who dedicated time in their incredibly busy and full lives to
take part my study. This simply would not have been possible without you.
Thanks also goes to my various placement supervisors and tutors, including Dr. Nan
Holmes, who have provided me with such enriching experiences and have given their
time and attention for my supervision and personal reflection – especially when fully
embodying what it means to be a person and a professional. I would also like to thank
the people I have worked with clinically during these placements, who have been a
privilege to work with and whom I have learnt so much from.
Coursemates, your support and unfaltering motivating presence have been crucial
throughout. The ‘hot water trips’ definitely have provided lovely welcome breaks!
To my family and friends, thank you for your continued encouragement to keep
working, positivity and for listening absolutely whenever I needed you to. Your
keenness to listen and interest in my work has been deeply valued, as have our chats,
laughs and our fun catch-ups! Words simply cannot express how grateful I am to have
your support in every way possible. Lastly, to my mum for encouraging me to follow
my intuition and for always believing in me.
3
Table of Contents
Part 1: Research - MRP Empirical Paper
Abstract
Introduction
Method
Results
Discussion
References
Appendices
p. 5
p. 6
p. 7
p. 14
p. 28
p. 53
p. 63
p. 81
Part 2: MRP Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Method
Results
Discussion
References
Appendices
p. 157
p. 158
p. 159
p. 163
p. 168
p. 196
p. 205
p. 219
Part 3: Clinical Experience p. 235
Part 4: Assessments p. 238
4
Part 1: Research
MRP Empirical Paper
Effectiveness of Relaxation Training for Anxiety and Depression in Family
Caregivers of Long-term Stroke Survivors
Word count: 9990
(excluding Abstract, Tables and Figures, References and Appendix)
5
Abstract
Objectives: Anxiety and depression are commonly experienced by caregivers of
stroke survivors. However, interventions which directly target mood are limited and
no recommendations for treatment of anxiety and depression of caregivers of stroke
survivors currently exist. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of self-help
relaxation training for anxiety, depression and coping in caregivers of stroke
survivors. Additional aims were to explore whether participants followed the
proposed structure of the relaxation training and whether their experience replicated
effects other populations have reported in the literature in relation to using relaxation
training. Method: This mixed methods study adopted a repeated measures within-
participant design assessing anxiety, depression and coping at three time points (Pre-
1, Pre-2 and Post; N = 18 caregivers of stroke survivors). Post-intervention, semi-
structured interview data were also collected and analysed using deductive thematic
analysis. Results: Quantitative outcome measures showed significant improvement
post-intervention in anxiety, depression and coping in relation to managing stress.
Managing Events/Problem-solving and Managing Perceptions/Meanings coping
scores showed no significant change post-intervention. Qualitative data supported the
quantitative findings, and suggested that participants generally followed the proposed
structure of the relaxation training and reported similar effects as found in the
literature. Conclusions: This study supports the use of self-help relaxation training for
caregivers of stroke survivors in terms of relieving anxiety and depression. Follow-up
research is required to assess whether the effects are maintained and to determine
whether there are factors which could influence the likelihood of change.
Key words: stroke caregivers, anxiety, depression, relaxation training
6
Introduction
Long-term disability following stroke is common in the UK. Approximately two-
thirds of stroke survivors who leave hospital have a disability (Adamson, Beswick, &
Ebrahim, 2004; Stroke Association, 2018). As 80% of stroke survivors then return
home (Han & Haley, 1999), family members often adopt caregiving roles at home to
support stroke survivors’ needs, in an unpaid capacity (i.e. informal caregivers,
Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010; Jaracz et al., 2015). However, many caregivers feel
ill-equipped for the role (Kalra et al., 2004) due to the significant number of possible
changes resultant from stroke, including behavioural, cognitive, physical and
emotional changes (e.g., loss of independence, paralysis and mood difficulties, Han &
Haley, 2009).
Given the likely significant changes following stroke and the greatly
demanding nature of the caregiving role, the negative effects of caregiving for stroke
survivors are well documented (Alexander & Wilz, 2010; Greenwood & Mackenzie,
2010; Jaracz et al., 2015). Systematic reviews have demonstrated high levels of
burden (i.e. the perceived weight held by caregivers’ due to fulfilling their caregiving
role) and depression (i.e. 25–54% and 34–52% respectively, Han & Haley, 1999;
Rigby, Gubitz, & Phillips, 2009). However, surprisingly, in comparison to burden and
depression, stroke caregiver anxiety has been investigated much less. This is in spite
of a recent review finding that anxiety is present in a similar number of caregivers:
11–51% (Choi-Kwon, Kim, Kwon, & Kim, 2005; Csecs, Thompson, & Simonds,
2019; Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010).
There have been some attempts to use interventions to reduce caregiver
anxiety, but minimal evidence exists (Cheng, Chair, & Chau, 2014; Greenwood &
7
Mackenzie, 2010; White, Cantu, & Trevino, 2015). Predominantly interventions have
consisted of education, information provision and skill-building, and to a lesser
extent, psychosocial support (Brereton, Carroll, & Barnston, 2007; Eldred & Sykes,
2008; McCurley et al., 2018; Smith, Forster, & Young, 2009). White, Cantu, and
Trevino (2015) concluded from 18 randomised controlled trials that interventions
which included skill-building (i.e. ‘an intervention that equipped the caregiver with
skills to provide care to the stroke survivor or skills to cope with the caregiving role’
p. 87) as a component were more likely to show a significant improvement on
psychological distress, caregiver burden and quality of life outcomes. However, the
benefits related to anxiety were limited (but see Kalra et al., 2004). Moreover, in a
Cochrane review, whilst information provision was shown to significantly increase
caregiver knowledge (standardized mean difference of 0.74; 95% CI: 0.06, 1.43), no
impact on mood (i.e. caregiver anxiety or emotional distress) was observed (Smith,
Forster, & Young, 2009). This finding of no significant change in mood was
supported in an earlier systematic review of psychosocial interventions, which
involved education provision, for stroke caregivers (Eldred & Sykes, 2008). Similarly,
a further Cochrane review in 2011 stated that there was insufficient data to support or
refute the use of ‘information and support’ or psychoeducational interventions to help
anxiety, compared to no intervention or usual care (Legg et al., 2011). Therefore, it
appears that a different intervention from the current skill-building options or
information provision is required to help caregivers’ anxiety.
Additionally, most of the research involving interventions for stroke
caregivers has been conducted within 1-year post-stroke (Brereton et al., 2007; White
et al., 2015), which means that appropriate intervention beyond this time is unknown.
8
Therefore, given the high levels of persistent anxiety (e.g. 19% of 88 stroke caregivers
5 years post-stroke scored in the clinical range for anxiety, Jaracz et al., 2015), it is
imperative to consider what intervention may be appropriate for stroke caregivers
beyond 1-year post-stroke as demands of caregiving are likely to change over time
(Macnamara, Gummow, Goka, & Gregg, 1990).
Brereton, Carroll, and Barnston (2007) found that the majority of interventions
(5/8) for stroke caregivers stated they were underpinned by stress-coping models
(problem-solving [n = 2], nurse-led support group [n = 2] and psychoeducation [n =
1]), whereby the mechanism of change in caregiver stress is often guided by this
model (Hartke & King, 2003). However, these were not specific interventions for
anxiety and did not directly target the physiological stress response. The stress-coping
model posits that stress arises when a person’s external demands outweigh their
perceived internal resources (Goodman & Ley, 2012). Therefore, coping is defined as
the ability to manage particular demands that are appraised as exceeding a person’s
resources and/or is possibly taxing, by continuously changing thoughts and actions
(Lazarus & Folkman 1984; Matthieu & Ivanoff, 2006). When stress occurs, this can
lead to increased physiological arousal which, should it become too high, can
negatively impact well-being and the person’s perceived and actual ability to cope
(Berto, 2014; Yerkes & Dodson, 1908). Henceforth, the stress-coping model could be
used to inform specific intervention for caregiver anxiety.
Relaxation training designed to decrease physiological arousal could be used
to counteract the stress response of anxiety and in turn help caregivers cope (Esch,
Fricchione, & Stefano, 2003; Steinhardt & Dolbier, 2008). Relaxation is defined by a
combination of interrelated physiological mechanisms and changes that are produced
9
when individuals complete a repetitive physical or mental activity, and do not engage
with distracting thoughts (Manzoni, Pagnini, Castelnuovo, & Molinari, 2008). Two
widely researched types of relaxation training, which involve repetitive physical or
mental activity to elicit a relaxation response, are: progressive muscle relaxation
(PMR) and autogenic relaxation (AR). PMR involves progressively tensing and
relaxing principle muscle groups in a specific order throughout the body (Jacobson,
1987), with the idea that over time relaxing the muscles will lead to a reduction of
impulses along motor and associated parts of the nervous system. AR involves
individuals removing external stimuli from their awareness and focusing on their
body by repeating psychophysiologically adapted statements to themselves (e.g. ‘my
heartbeat is calm and regular’, Kanji, 1997).
Effectiveness of PMR and AR has been shown in numerous populations: those
with physical health conditions, mental health conditions, and specific subpopulations
such as stroke survivors (Manzoni et al., 2008; Pagnini, Manzoni, Castelnuovo, &
Molnari, 2013). For example, stroke survivors (N = 21) living in the community were
asked to listen to a relaxation CD, which involved PMR and AR exercises for 20
minutes five times a week, for at least one month (Golding, Kneebone, & Fife-Schaw,
2016). Survivors who participated in the relaxation training were significantly more
likely to report reduced anxiety (measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression
Scale), compared to controls (p < 0.01, d = 1.48). These results also held at 1-year
follow-up: anxiety ratings reduced significantly between pre-intervention and 1-year
follow-up (p < 0.001, Golding, Fife-Schaw, & Kneebone, 2017). A self-help
relaxation intervention involving PMR and AR has not been investigated with
10
caregivers, but it presents a promising approach as it has successfully reduced anxiety
in a range of populations, including stroke survivors.
Stroke caregivers commonly report a lack of support available long-term (i.e.
once acute care has finished, Jaracz et al., 2015; Martin, Yip, Hearty, Marietta, & Hill,
2002; McKevitt, Redfern, Mold, & Wolfe, 2004; Young, Murray, & Forster, 2003).
Subsequently, effective treatments for high levels of anxiety need to be sought in
terms of psychological outcome and feasibility due to limited resources and,
therefore, financial cost. Self-help approaches may present a realistic option to meet
these requirements. ‘Self-help’ refers to a psychological treatment where individuals
follow a standardised treatment protocol at home, which they work through generally
independently (Cujipers & Schuurmans, 2007). A guide is provided which explains
the steps to follow to apply a psychological treatment to themselves. For example, as
discussed, stroke survivors found using a self-help relaxation CD reduced their
anxiety effectively (Golding et al., 2016); this was also shown to be cost-effective
compared to other anxiety treatments, which is increasingly important given the
growing constraints on the health service in the UK (Oddy & da Silva Ramos, 2013).
Self-help relaxation could also address some of the barriers to accessing
support stroke caregivers have expressed. For example, in recent semi-structured
interviews with 24 survivor-caregiver dyads, anticipated difficulties with attending
appointments in hospitals due to challenges finding time were reported (McCurley et
al., 2018). Flexibility in intervention timing and mode of delivery were suggested as
solutions to this, and were predicted to reduce stress associated with attending
appointments. Thus, having an intervention which caregivers could access easily and
complete at home could be beneficial. Furthermore, self-help relaxation was chosen
11
because it was considered simple to learn and use in a flexible way, and it was not
dependent on using the internet (e.g. self-guided internet-delivered cognitive-
behavioural therapy, Titov et al., 2016), which was considered important for older
adult caregivers due to their limited time often reported and possible accessibility to
equipment. Self-help relaxation training has also been shown to be usable by older
adults (Golding et al., 2016), which other self-help approaches may not be as suitable
for without additional teaching and support (e.g. mindfulness-based interventions as
high drop-out can be common, Geiger et al., 2016). Additionally, this could be
important because ensuring caregivers have the right support has implications for the
outcome of the stroke survivor also (White et al., 2015). Research has shown that
healthier and better supported caregivers can improve both stroke survivors’ long-
term rehabilitation outcome and their quality of life (Glass, Matchar, Belyea, &
Feussner, 1993; Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010; van Exel et al., 2004; Visser-Meily,
van Heugten, Post, Schepers, & Lindeman, 2005). Given these inter-relational
findings, recently a dyadic framework has been proposed for understanding post-
stroke distress, whereby caregiver and stroke survivor functioning should be
considered together (Bakas, McCarthy & Miller, 2017; McCurley et al., 2018).
Therefore, supporting caregivers of stroke survivors could be beneficial for both the
stroke survivors they support and themselves.
Self-help relaxation incorporating PMR and AR exercises could also be an
appropriate intervention to address depression and improve coping in stroke
caregivers. This is due to the significantly high co-occurrence between anxiety and
depression (50–72% of patients experience an anxiety and a depressive disorder
concurrently, Hirschfield, 2001; Kessler et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2017). Therefore, it
12
is possible that if anxiety improves, depression could also. Evidence for PMR
suggests that muscles become more relaxed, attention improves and thinking reduces
(Jacobson, 1987; Scheufele, 2000). These findings could suggest that depression may
improve because people may attend less to possible negative thoughts (Asare &
Danquah, 2017). Furthermore, as considerable burden is experienced by high numbers
of stroke caregivers, such that a caregiver’s external demands outweighs their
perceived internal resources (i.e. caregivers perceive they are unable to cope with the
situation), the stress-coping model could be used to hypothesise that if relaxation
exercises can reduce caregiver anxiety and thus physiological arousal/stress, then their
perceived and actual ability to cope should improve. To support this hypothesis, Kanji
(1997) reported that using AR leads to an improvement in coping abilities. Evidence
further supporting this found that family caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s
disease and caregivers of people with lung cancer, who completed relaxation training
which included PMR exercises, subsequently reported significant improvement in
coping skills (Fisher & Laschinger, 2001; Porter et al., 2011), although there was
some additional training provided in coping skills so it would be useful to discern the
specific effects of relaxation training.
To further investigate the effectiveness of PMR and AR in addressing anxiety,
depression and coping, it seemed pertinent to consider the process by which this may
occur. Mixed methods approaches can provide greater insight into and breadth of
findings (Curry et al., 2013), and help discern why findings occurred as quantitative
outcomes can be explored qualitatively in more depth (Halcomb & Hickman, 2015;
Medical Research Council, 2019). Using mixed methods can also allow for less bias
due to triangulating data using multiple methods (Jick, 1979; Johnstone, 2004).
13
Aims and Hypotheses
This study investigated the effectiveness of a PMR and AR self-help
relaxation intervention for stroke caregivers. The main hypothesis was that anxiety
would significantly reduce following one month of relaxation training. Due to the
high correlation between anxiety and depression, the secondary hypothesis was that
depression would significantly reduce after completing relaxation training. Based on
the stress model, the third hypothesis was that coping would significantly improve
after relaxation intervention. Additional aims of the study were, using qualitative
methods, to gather information on potential processes underpinning outcomes and the
extent to which these were consistent with the theoretical basis of PMR and AR and
previous research. This included exploration of the usage of relaxation training and
participants’ perception of change.
Method
Design
This study adopted a repeated measures within-participant design with
planned assessment at three time points to examine the effect of self-help relaxation
(independent variable) on anxiety, depression and coping (dependent variables).
Participants were initially assessed (Pre-1) and then again one month later (Pre-2) to
create a baseline measurement, before they received intervention (the self-help
relaxation audio). The measurement at Pre-1 and Pre-2 provided a control for time in
relation to possible change in anxiety, depression or coping, expectancy effects or
contact with the researchers (Dettmers et al., 2002). The baseline (Pre-1 and Pre-2)
measurement was also completed to establish whether there was measurement
14
stability (defined as no significant difference between Pre-1 and Pre-2 scores,
Szaflarski et al., 2006) before the intervention. Participants listened to the audio for
one month and then were assessed again (Post). All participants were caregivers and
their stroke survivors, who lived in the community.
Recruitment
Participants were recruited through opportunity sampling. A letter (see
Appendix B) and information sheets (Appendix C), giving an outline of the project
and the researchers’ contact details, were sent out to caregivers of stroke survivors
who had participated in research previously with one of the authors (N = 42).
Potential participants were asked to contact the researchers if they were interested in
participating. Caregivers were then telephoned approximately one-month later by the
main researcher to seek interest. All participants were clearly informed about the
purpose of the study and given the opportunity to ask questions pertaining to the
research. Participants were told that there was no obligation to participate. It was
emphasised that participants could withdraw from the study at any point should they
wish to without any adverse consequences. Consent forms were sent out in the post to
interested participants (Appendix D). Consent was also sought from stroke survivors
of caregivers, to collect some demographic information and details about the stroke
they had.
Non-NHS stroke groups in the South of England were also approached
directly, via telephone or email, and asked to circulate information sheets to group
members. Potential participants were asked to contact the researcher via telephone,
email or post. Following contact with the researcher, consent forms were sent out to
interested participants.
15
A priori power analysis was conducted using G*Power 3.1 (Faul, Erdfelder,
Lang, & Buchner, 2007) to determine the required sample size and thus enable
adequate power to be achieved. This was calculated using data from previous work of
this nature (Golding et al., 2016). The paper presented means and standard deviations
of participants who completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale on four
occasions, from which a between-group correlation of -0.68 was derived. Golding,
Kneebone and Fife-Schaw (2016) reported an effect size of d = 1.48, this was
converted to f = .74 for use in the power calculation. Utilising these values with power
at .80, α = .05 for use of a repeated measure ANOVA, G*Power suggested a sample
of 12 was required (Appendix E).
Participants
Participants were family caregivers of stroke survivors living in the
community. Inclusion criteria were that caregivers had to be aged 18 or above, they
did not get paid for caring for the stroke survivor, they were contactable by telephone
and had adequate hearing, they had adequate written and/or spoken English to
complete outcome measures, and had access to a technological device from which
they could listen to the relaxation training. Exclusion criteria were if the caregiver was
receiving psychological intervention, participating in research which involved
psychological intervention, and pregnancy (due to insurance purposes). To maximise
variability in the sample, a pre-defined clinical cut-off of anxiety was not used.
Measures and Materials
A variety of published measures were used, which have all been used with
stroke caregivers previously. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS),
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Carer’s Assessment of Management Index
(CAMI), were used to assess outcomes (i.e. test hypotheses, see Table 1). The BAI
16
was used to measure anxiety, in addition to the HADS-A subscale, in order to increase
construct validity because the HADS-A neglects to assess some somatic complaints of
anxiety (Hansson, Chotai, Nordstöm, & Bodlund, 2009; Muntingh et al., 2011). Good
reliability and validity are evident for each measure described, with more detailed
information shown in Appendix F, which includes more in-depth scoring information
and rationale for usage.
17
Table 1
Measures used to test hypotheses
InstrumentReference Completion time
Construct measured; items and scale
Scoring and interpretation
Psychometrics
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)5 minutes
Two 7-item subscales measure anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D).
Rated each item in relation to frequency experienced in the past week on a 4-point Likert
scale, e.g. ‘I get sudden feelings of panic’ from ‘0 – not at all’ to ‘3 – very often
indeed’.
Total score for each subscale is 21. Higher
scores are indicative of greater levels of anxiety and
depression.
Good internal consistency of both subscales (HADS-
A Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83, HADS-D
Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82).Good concurrent validity with other measures of anxiety and depression, and good sensitivity and specificity in relation to
clinical caseness (Bjelland, Dahl, Haug, &
Neckelmann, 2002).
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI, Beck & Steer, 19935 minutes
21-item measure of anxiety, comprising of descriptive
statements of anxiety symptoms.
Rated each item in relation to how much they have been bothered by it over the past week (e.g. shaky) on a 4-
point Likert scale, e.g. ‘0 – not at all’ to ‘3 – severely, I
could barely stand it’.
Higher scores suggest greater
the anxiety symptomology,
with a total possible score
of 63.
High internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92, Beck, Epstein, Brown, &
Steer, 1988), and reasonable test re-test
reliability of 0.62 and 0.93 at 7- and 1-week intervals respectively. Correlated with other widely used
measures of anxiety (e.g., State-Trait Anxiety
Inventory, r = 0.47–0.58, Beck & Steer, 1993) thus good concurrent validity
was illustrated (Portney & Watkins, 2007).
The Carers’ Assessment of Managing Index (CAMI, Nolan, Keady, & Grant, 1995)10 minutes (Harvey et al., 2005)
Caregivers rate 38 statements about coping strategies they
use and how helpful they find them. Strategies (e.g. having a good cry) are rated on a 4-point Likert scale from ‘1 – I
do not use this’, ‘2 – Not really helpful’, ‘3 – Quite
helpful’ to ‘4 – Very helpful’
Scores range from 38–152, with higher
scores suggestive of more effective
coping.
Good internal consistency for the CAMI was
reported as 0.86 (i.e. Cronbach’s alpha, Nolan
et al., 1995) and more recently as 0.91 (Jarvis, Worth, & Porter, 2006), and, acceptable for the
subscales 0.64-0.69 (Llewellyn, Gething,
18
(Yeh & Bull, 2012). The CAMI has three subscales: Managing
Events/Problem Solving (15 items), Managing
Meanings/Perceptions (14 items) and Managing Stress
(9 items).
Kendig, & Cant, 2003). Good content and
construct validity has been argued as the measure was based on the transactional model of stress and coping
(Harvey et al., 2005; Nolan, Grant, & Keady,
1998).
The Caregiver Strain Index (CSI), RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND
SF-36), Medical Outcomes Support Survey (MOS-SSS) and the Modified Rankin
Scale (mRS) were used to enable a detailed description of the sample (see Table 2).
The only additional measure not used previously with caregivers was an adapted mRS
of one item. This was used to provide an estimate of stroke survivors’ mental
functioning (i.e. their cognitive ability) rated by their caregivers, which was also
hoped to not contribute significantly to testing fatigue. A detailed description of the
sample was provided due to the paucity of research involving long-term caregivers of
stroke survivors (Jaracz et al., 2015) and to allow for consistent comparisons to be
made in future research. All standardised measures included in the study were suitable
to be administered by researchers (e.g. through a telephone call) and/or completed
self-report (e.g. via online survey or postal questionnaire); these methods of measure
administration have been conducted in published research previously, predominantly
involving caregivers.
A copy of all of the measures were shared with members of the Service User
and Carer Advisory Group in Clinical Psychology at the University of Surrey.
Feedback was obtained before the measures were finalised for usage in the study.
Group members were asked what they thought of the measures and the number of
them being used. Members thought asking that amount of questions at Pre-1 was
19
appropriate, as long as the purpose of collecting the information was clearly
described. Members also said they found it useful knowing that measures had been
published and used in research previously, as this provided confidence in the study in
relation to it being thoughtful and considered.
20
Table 2
Measures used to provide a detailed description of the sample
InstrumentCompletion time
Construct measured; items and scale Scoring and interpretation
Psychometrics
The Caregiver Strain Index (Robinson, 1983; Thornton & Travis, 2003)5 minutes
13 items related to the demands of caregiving, such as ‘It is a financial strain’ which caregivers rated ‘Yes’ or ‘No’.
Scores range from 0–13; the higher the scores, the more considerable the
burden experienced.
Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .86, Robinson, 1983). Construct validity of the
CSI established when correlated with other measures of distress in caregivers.
RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND Corporation, 2018)10 minutes
Quality of life measure with eight subscales and a single item measuring perceived change in health (Ware &
Sherbourne, 1992): Physical Functioning, Bodily Pain, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Role Limitations due to Personal or Emotional Problems,
Emotional Well-being, Social Functioning, Energy/Fatigue and General Health Perceptions. Options rated on a Likert
scale, e.g. ‘in general would you say your health is: excellent, very good, good, fair or poor’.
Scores are coded on a 0 to 100 range and items in the same
scale averaged together. Higher
scores are indicative of a more positive
health state.
Good to excellent internal consistency demonstrated for all of the subscales (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78–0.93, Ware & Sherbourne, 1992). Good discriminant and construct validity was
shown by relating scores to measures of medical and psychiatric conditions (McHorney, Ware,
Rogers, Raczek, & Lu, 1992).
21
Medical Outcomes Support Survey (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991)5 minutes
14-items of the original 19-item scale were rated which measure dimensions of social support:
Emotional/Informational Support, Affectionate Support and Positive Social Interaction. Tangible Support subscale and
additional item were omitted due to these not being relevant for caregivers. Rated item (e.g. ‘someone to have good time with’) on a scale ranging from ‘None of the time’ to ‘All of
the time’.
Summed scores range from 14–70. Higher
scores represent greater perceived
social support.
Excellent internal consistency has been evidenced (Cronbach’s alphas for the subscales > 0.90, Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991). Results also showed that the MOS-SSS has high convergent and discriminant validity with relevant measures
of quality of life.
Modified Rankin Scale (Sulter, Steen, & Keyser, 1999)1 minute
Used to obtain an estimate of the stroke survivor’s physical functioning, (i.e. the level of physical disability and dependency in activities of daily living after the
stroke, Choi-Kwon et al., 2005; Wan-Fei et al., 2017). Caregivers rated this on a one-item 6-point Likert scale, ranging from ‘No support at all’ to ‘Severe disability;
bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention’.
Excellent test re-test reliability presented (k = 0.81–0.95, Banks & Marotta, 2007), and
moderate inter-rater reliability (k = 0.56–0.78). Construct validity affirmed through mRS scores being related to measures of severity of stroke.
Convergent validity shown through comparisons with other scales used to assess stroke survivors
(r = 0.89, Lai & Duncan, 1999).
Modified Rankin Scale adapted1 minute
The original mRS was adapted to provide an estimate of stroke survivors’ mental functioning, in terms of cognitive ability. Caregivers were asked to rate stroke
survivors’ in relation to the support they required with tasks requiring cognitive functioning irrespective of physical ability, such as everyday tasks (e.g. responding to instructions accurately). Ratings were on a 6-point Likert scale, adapted from the
mRS physical functioning categories, ranging from ‘0 – No support at all’, ‘3 – Moderate disability; requiring some help’ to ‘5 – Severe disability; requiring constant
care and attention’.
Not established: the adaptation was made to provide an estimate of cognitive functioning
ability, which was feasible for the caregiver to rate and would not contribute significantly
towards testing fatigue.
22
Background information form.
This questionnaire, adapted from the background information form used in Golding et
al. (2016), was completed by each participant at Pre-1 (see Appendix G). This
included questions regarding demographics, living and caring situation, major
diagnoses, current medication and whether they had used psychological therapy
previously.
A shorter version of this questionnaire was completed by each stroke survivor
at Pre-1 who consented to being part of the study (see Appendix H). Demographic
questions and two questions about the stroke they had were asked.
Relaxation training.
The relaxation training followed the same scripts as used in Golding et al.
(2016). It comprised of three tracks (see Appendix I), 1) introduction to progressive
muscle relaxation (PMR, approximately 1 minute). Participants could omit this when
they thought that they no longer needed an introduction; 2) PMR – participants were
invited to progressively tense and relax muscle groups (approximately 9 minutes); and
3) Autogenic relaxation (AR) – participants were asked to repeat calming statements
to themselves, to focus on their breath and attend to different aspects of the body (e.g.
heart beat) and experience them in certain ways (e.g., heavy, relaxed). The AR
training followed the script as described in Winkler, James, Fatovich and Underwood
(1982), with the defined duration of 12–20 minutes.
Participants were asked to practise the training five times per week for one
month. Golding et al. (2016) found this to be effective in reducing anxiety. Moreover,
Manzoni, Pagnini, Castelnuovo, and Molinari’s (2008) review reported those who
practised relaxation techniques of this frequency showed a more substantial reduction
in anxiety, compared with those who completed relaxation over a shorter time period.
23
A one-month intervention period also seemed acceptable for participants in Golding
et al.’s (2016) study as only two participants withdrew from an initial sample size of
21.
Experience of relaxation training form.
This questionnaire, used by Golding et al. (2016), was completed by each
participant over the telephone following completion of the relaxation training
(Appendix J). This enquired about participants’ subjective experiences of using the
training and afforded an opportunity to provide suggestions as to how it could be
improved. Questions included frequency of completing the training, positive and
negative experiences of it, and intention to continue using it.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval was provided by the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
Ethics Committee at the University of Surrey and the Departmental Ethics Committee
at the University of York (Appendix K). Prior to participating in the study, written
consent was obtained from caregivers and stroke survivors. Caregivers had the option
to give written consent if the stroke survivor was unable to write (due to dysgraphia or
other impairments caused by the stroke). Where stroke survivors did not provide
consent, but their caregiver gave consent for themselves, the caregiver was still able
to participate in the study and received the intervention, but the basic information
about the stroke survivor was not included in the study (e.g. time since stroke).
Procedure (Figure 1)
Following receiving the completed consent form(s), participants were asked
screening questions for eligibility (i.e. whether they were receiving psychological
intervention, participating in research which involved psychological intervention or
were pregnant). Eligible participants could select the completion format of the first set
24
of questionnaires (face-to-face, online, post, or telephone) and how they would like to
receive the relaxation intervention (CD or audio file).
Participants were then either sent the questionnaires (HADS, BAI, CAMI,
CSI, RAND SF-36, MOS-SSS and the mRSs) via an online link or in the post with a
stamp addressed envelope, or they were administered by the researcher at a mutually
agreed time (Pre-1). Following this, arrangements were made to telephone
participants one month after they completed these initial questionnaires (Pre-2).
During the telephone call (approximately 20 minutes), participants were asked
to complete the HADS, BAI and CAMI. Calls were used for all participants as they
were considered feasible and had previously been shown to be acceptable to stroke
caregivers when completing outcome measures (Hoffmann, Worrall, Eames, & Ryan,
2010). Moreover, missing data could be minimised and the likelihood of a good
response rate increased in comparison to self-completed measures (either online or
postal, Fan & Yan, 2010; Golding et al., 2016; Harris, Weinberger, & Tierney, 1997).
Participants were then sent the relaxation audio. Written guidance for the relaxation
training and a one-month diary sheet for participants to complete were provided
(Appendix L). Participants were encouraged to contact the researcher if any concerns
or questions arose during the study. This occurred once (a participant received a
damaged relaxation CD).
One month later participants were telephoned again (for approximately 30
minutes) to re-administer the HADS, BAI and CAMI (Post). They were also asked
questions about their experience of using the relaxation training over the previous
month.
25
Figure 1. Study procedure
26
Data Preparation for Statistical Analyses
Data used in hypotheses testing were examined for missing values. There was
< 0.01% missing data, with no clear pattern of non-responses such that it was
assumed they were missing at random. Therefore, item-level imputation was utilised
where there were fewer than 20% of item responses missing for each participant on a
specific scale (Mazza, Enders, & Ruehlman, 2015), with the missing item values
replaced by averaging the available items from other participants’ responses on those
specific items. Item-level imputation was chosen over mean substitution due to
increased precision and power in this approach demonstrated previously (Gottschall,
West, & Enders, 2012). One participant completed less than 80% of the CAMI at Pre-
1 so this was not included in analyses.
Prior to conducting inferential statistics, test assumptions were checked and
are reported in the Results alongside the inferential statistics utilised.
Qualitative Analysis
Qualitative data from telephone interviews were analysed using deductive
thematic analysis (Crabtree & Miller, 1999). This explored participants’ usage of the
relaxation training and their perception of change. This included assessing whether
participants followed the proposed structure of the relaxation training, and whether
changes were reported similar to those found in previous research. A template of
themes was compiled a priori to achieve this (see Appendix M for full descriptors of
themes) based on the core process components of PMR and AR, and the likely effects
of completion of PMR and AR (see Table 3).
27
Table 3
Core processes of PMR and AR, and the likely effects of completion based on the
literature
PMR based on Jacobson (1987) AR based on Kanji (1997)
Core processes Relaxes a group of muscles which are acquainted in a
certain order (with the principal muscle-groups of the entire
body)
Reduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive afferent
stimulation, such that training should take place in a quiet room
Practises from day to day tending towards a state in
which quiet is automatically maintained
Mental repetition of psychophysiologically adapted
verbal formulae, whereby mental activity is conceived as ‘passive
concentration’
Likely effects of relaxation training
Releasing the tension of muscles
Counteracting of acute stress or fatigue
Absence of thinking and control of images and attention
Achieve peace of mind
Cope with life’s pressures and improve coping abilities
Note. Reduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive afferent stimuli refers to the reduction of external stimuli (e.g. noise, Kassab & Alexandre, 2015) and internal stimuli (i.e. stimuli produced and perceived by the person, which includes what is perceived when parts of the body are moved, Proske & Gandevia, 2012)
Interviews were not audio recorded as the main purpose of this data was to
supplement the quantitative data. Once all of the data had been collected, the main
researcher assigned meaning units to what the participants said (i.e. codes, Saldana,
2009) and organised these codes in relation to the themes based on the a priori
framework as discussed above (i.e. in relation to the process and possible effects of
PMR and AR). As the approach was mainly deductive, given the template of themes
that was developed and no audio-recording was completed, this means that a level of
interpretation was present as the main researcher was likely to be attuned to aspects
they were interested in and prioritised recording these. However, any data outside of
28
the template was also included if it was relevant to the aim, such that additional codes
were created for data which did not fit the a priori themes.
Results
Eighteen stroke caregivers, 10 were female and eight were male, were initially
recruited, aged between 42 and 74 (mean = 63.7 years; SD = 8.6). Most identified as
White British (n = 17). Other demographic characteristics and information about their
living and caring situation is presented in Table 4. Three caregivers withdrew from
the study between Pre-2 and Post, all of which were due to health reasons.
29
Table 4
Sociodemographic characteristics of caregivers at baseline (N = 18)
Characteristics n %Age (mean, SD) 63.7 (8.6) Range: 42.4–74.2Sex, female 10 56Ethnic group, any White background 18 100Marital status
Married 14 78Partner 2 11Divorced 1 6Not reported 1 6
JobEmployed 4 22Self-employed 1 6Retired 6 33Retired/stopped work to become a caregiver
6 33
Unable to work 1 6Highest education achieved
Secondary school 8 44Sixth form 4 22Bachelor’s degree 3 17Other 3 17
Caregiver living with survivor 16 89Caregiver relationship with survivor
Spouse/partner 16 89Parent 2 11
Hours spent caregiving per day (mean, SD) 14.1 (9.1) Range: 2–24Duration of being a caregiver (mean in years, SD) 9.4 (3.5) Range: 2–15.7Diagnosed with mental or physical health difficulties
9 50
Not accessing professional support at present 16 89Not accessed psychological therapy previously 13 72Taking medication currently 11 61
Note. SD = standard deviation
Sixteen stroke survivors, nine were female and seven were male, provided
consent for demographic data and information about their stroke to be collected. Most
identified as White British (n = 15). Table 5 details further demographic information
and the estimation of functioning of stroke survivors rated by their caregivers. On
average, it was 11 years (SD = 3.6) since stroke survivors first had a stroke. The
majority of caregivers estimated that they cared for stroke survivors who had a
30
moderately severe physical disability (n = 11, 61%) and a moderately severe to severe
disability in relation to mental functioning (n = 14, 78%).
Table 5
Demographic characteristics of stroke survivors at baseline (N = 16)
Characteristics n %Age (mean, SD) 61.3 (11.5) Range: 41.4–80.3Sex, female 9 56
Highest education achievedSecondary school 4 25Sixth form 3 19Bachelor’s degree 4 25Master’s degree 3 19Other 2 13
Type of strokeIschaemic 8 50Haemorrhagic 2 13Middle cerebral artery 2 13Not known/not reported 4 25
Time since stroke (mean in years, SD) 11.0 (3.6) Range: 2–17.2Caregiver’s estimation of physical functioning
No significant disability despite symptoms
1 6
Slight disability 1 6Moderate disability 1 6Moderately severe disability 11 61Severe disability 4 22
Caregiver’s estimation of mental functioningNo significant disability despite symptoms
1 6
Slight disability 2 11Moderate disability 1 6Moderately severe disability 7 39Severe disability 7 39
Most participants chose to complete the first set of measures online and equal
numbers chose an audio CD and an audio file (Table 6).
31
Table 6
Method participants chose to complete measures at Pre-1 and how they received the
relaxation audio
Method n %Method of questionnaire completion
Online survey
8 44
Postal survey 6 33Telephone 4 22
Method of listening to relaxation audio
CD 9 50Audio file 9 50
Table 7 shows the level of burden, quality of life related to physical and
mental health, and levels of perceived social support rated by caregivers at Pre-1. The
scores suggest that caregivers experienced significant burden. The level of perceived
quality of life in relation to physical health was generally similar to caregivers’
perceived quality of life related to their mental health, with a similar range across the
sample. Much variation was present in relation to perceived social support.
Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for all measures at each time point and this mostly
showed good levels of internal consistency, which were generally similar to levels
found in previous research (> 0.70 and acceptable for the subscales of the CAMI
0.64–0.69 see Table 7, Llewellyn et al., 2003).
32
Table 7
Caregiver burden, quality of life and social support ratings at Pre-1
Scale n (due to missing
data)
Mean (SD)
Range Cronbach’s alpha
Comparison to previous research
Caregiver Strain Index (/13)
18 6.53 (3.83)
0–13 0.84 Similar mean score to caregivers 3-months post-discharge from stroke rehabilitation (mean: 7, Lui, Lee,
Greenwood & Rose, 2012) and 15-months
post-stroke (mean: 5.8, Macnamara et al., 1990)
RAND SF-36 Physical Component Summary /100
17 44.41 (11.27)
23.14–63.48
0.93 Much lower compared to caregivers earlier post-stroke (3-months post-discharge from stroke
rehabilitation: 68.7 and 62.1 respectively, Lui et
al., 2012; average subscale score: 67 1-year post-stroke, Smith et al.,
2004).
RAND SF-36 Mental Component Summary / 100
17 43.38 (11.75)
18.36–60.68
MOS-SSS total /100 16 49.00 (26.07)
7.14–94.64
0.997 Mean scores were similar to a sample of stroke caregivers’ 3-months post-discharge from stroke rehabilitation (43.2–51.5 average
subscale scores, Lui et al., 2012).
MOS-SSS Emotional / Informational Support /100
46.48 (34.61)
0–90.63
MOS-SSS Affectionate Support / 100
59.38 (31.75)
0–100
MOS-SSS Positive Social Interaction / 100
45.31 (23.76)
0–100
Clinical range of CSI ≥ 6
33
Anxiety
The mean and standard deviation were calculated for scores on both scales of
anxiety across the three time points (Table 8). On average before intervention,
participants scored in the clinical range for anxiety on the HADS-A, at a level similar
to stroke caregivers over 1-year post-stroke and 5-years post-stroke reported
previously (mean = 7.7, Dankner et al., 2016; mean = 7.8, Jaracz et al., 2015), and in
the ‘mild anxiety’ range on the BAI. After intervention, on average, scores on the
HADS-A were in the normal range (mean = 5.67, SD = 3.66) and on the borderline of
the ‘minimal’ and ‘mild’ anxiety ranges on the BAI (mean = 7.67, SD = 8.20).
Table 8
Scores on outcome measures across time points
Scale Pre-1(n = 18)*
Pre-2 (n = 18)
Post (n = 15)
Cronbach’s alphaPre-1, Pre-2, Post
HADS-A /21 9.5 (4.09) 9.83 (3.26) 5.67 (3.66) 0.78, 0.69, 0.86
BAI /63 10.67 (7.86) 12.78 (8.47) 7.67 (8.20) 0.87, 0.89, 0.93
HADS-D /21 8.28 (4.23) 7.72 (4.01) 5.00 (3.18) 0.84, 0.76, 0.78
CAMI Total /152 105.24 (15.89) 109.76 (12.4) 109.73 (16.81) 0.87, 0.79, 0.91
CAMI – Managing Events / Problem-solving /64
40.29 (8.01) 43.41 (8.01) 42.53 (7.75) 0.82, 0.78, 0.84
CAMI Managing Meanings / Perceptions /60
43.76 (5.75) 44.67 (5.47) 43.67 (7.11) 0.63, 0.60, 0.84
CAMI Managing Stress /48
21.18 (5.25) 21.33 (4.32) 23.53 (4.81) 0.66, 0.68, 0.71
Note. Clinical ranges for HADS-A and HADS-D ≥ 8, and BAI ≥ 16, BAI breakdown: 0–7 = Minimal, 8–15 = Mild, 16–25 = Moderate, 26–63 = Severe.
* n = 17 for CAMI total and CAMI subscales due to missing data
34
Data preparation.
Prior to conducting statistical analyses, assumptions of parametric tests were
checked using HADS-A and BAI scores. Data were independent. From inspecting
boxplots and scatterplots for the total score at each time point, HADS-A scores
seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line
(see Appendix N). No outliers were identified. The assumption of normality was
checked by scrutinising histograms of the data and examining whether data comprised
of a normal distribution, and through using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro
Wilk tests where normality was indicated when p > .05 (Field, 2013). All HADS-A
scores met both the visual and numerical inspection criteria, such that data were
assumed to be normally distributed. As HADS-A scores met assumptions for
parametric tests, one-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare anxiety
scores across time points. BAI scores did not seem to follow a linear pattern as points
did not generally cluster around the fit line, BAI scores at Post were not shown to
follow a normal distribution (p < .05), and there was evidence of positive skewness on
the histogram. As BAI scores failed to meet the visual and numerical inspection
criteria, a Friedman’s ANOVA, a non-parametric test, was used to compare anxiety
scores measured using the BAI across time points (Field, 2013).
To assess whether outcomes of anxiety were stable between Pre-1 and Pre-2
(without intervention, i.e. whether Pre-2 constituted a stable and appropriate baseline
measurement as this score was completed closest to the intervention), a one-way
repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare HADS-A scores between Pre-1 and
Pre-2, and a Friedman’s ANOVA was used to compare BAI scores between Pre-1 and
Pre-2. If no significant differences were found then stability in measurement would be
35
assumed, such that the Pre-2 and Post score comparison tested using contrasts in the
repeated measures ANOVAs would then be used to discern whether there was a
significant reduction/increase in anxiety post-intervention. Therefore, all the repeated
measures analyses were completed with planned comparisons (i.e. between Pre-1 and
Pre-2, and, between Pre-2 and Post) due to the expectation that measurement would
be stable between Pre-1 and Pre-2, and the hypotheses that the intervention would
lead to change at Post (Field, 2013). As there is no equivalent of contrasts in
Friedman’s ANOVA, pairwise comparisons of BAI scores would be completed using
Wilcoxon tests (Field, 2013). For each planned comparison as they were non-
orthogonal (i.e. comparisons were related as it was a repeated measures design),
Bonferroni correction was used on the alpha level (α/2) = .025 to control for the
possibility of type I error (Field, 2013).
Change in HADS-A.
Mauchly’s test indicated that the assumption of sphericity had been violated,
x²(2) = 6.81, p = .033, therefore Greenhouse-Geisser corrected tests are reported (ε
= .71, Field, 2013). The results show that anxiety significantly reduced over time,
F(1.42, 19.89) = 9.53, p = .003, ω2 = 0.18 (a large effect size). Planned contrasts
revealed that there was no significant difference between HADS-A scores from Pre-1
to Pre-2, F(1, 14) = .01, p = .942. Planned contrasts showed that anxiety significantly
reduced from Pre-2 to Post, F(1, 14) = 31.82, p < .001, r = 0.83 (a large effect size,
Field, 2013, Figure 2).
36
Figure 2. HADS-A and BAI scores compared pre- and post-relaxation training
Change in BAI.
Participants’ anxiety significantly changed over time, x²(2) = 9.15, p = .010.
Planned pairwise comparisons using Wilcoxon tests showed that anxiety did not
significantly change from the start of the study (Pre-1) to one month (Pre-2), T = -.37,
p = .946. It appeared that anxiety significantly reduced from Pre-2 to Post, T = 1.03, p
= .014, r = -0.53 (a large effect size). Therefore, anxiety seemed to have improved
following the intervention (see Figure 2).
Depression
Table 8 shows that on average before intervention, participants scored in the
clinical range for depression, which was higher than had been reported previously by
stroke caregivers 3-months post-discharge and 5-years post-stroke (mean = 3.6, Lui et
Anxiety MeasureAnxiety Measure
37
al., 2012; mean = 5.6, Jaracz et al., 2015). After intervention, on average, scores on
the HADS-D improved and were in the normal range.
Data preparation.
Assumptions of parametric statistical tests were checked. Data were
independent. From inspecting boxplots and scatterplots for the total HADS-D score at
each time point, the data seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally
clustering around the fit line (see Appendix O). No outliers were identified. All scores
met both the visual and numerical inspection criteria, such that data were assumed to
be normally distributed. Therefore, a one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used
to assess for change in HADS-D scores over time.
As completed for anxiety scores, using planned comparisons, depression
scores were compared between Pre-1 and Pre-2, and then between Pre-2 and Post
using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. If no significant differences were found
between Pre-1 and Pre-2, then stability in measurement would be assumed, and the
Pre-2 and Post comparison would be tested using contrasts to discern whether there
was a significant reduction/increase in depression post-intervention. As above,
Bonferroni correction was used on the alpha level (α/2) = .025 to control for the
possibility of type I error (Field, 2013).
Change in depression.
Mauchly’s test indicated that the assumption of sphericity had not been
violated, x²(2) = 3.33, p = .189. The results show that depression significantly reduced
over time, F(2, 28) = 5.83, p = .008, ω2 = 0.07 (a medium effect size). Planned
contrasts revealed that there was no significant difference between HADS-D scores at
38
Pre-1 to Pre-2, F(1, 14) = .21, p = .658. Planned contrasts showed that depression
significantly reduced from Pre-2 to Post, F(1, 14) = 7.60, p = .015, r = 0.59 (a large
effect size, see Figure 3). This suggests participants’ symptoms of depression
improved post-intervention.
Figure 3. Depression scores compared pre- and post-relaxation training
Coping
Table 8 and Figure 4 suggest there was little change in overall coping scores
pre- and post-intervention. However, scores on the CAMI Managing Stress subscale
suggested improvement post-intervention.
39
Figure 4. CAMI scores compared pre- and post-relaxation training
Data preparation.
Assumptions of parametric statistical tests were checked. Data were
independent. From inspecting boxplots and scatterplots at each time point, for the
total CAMI score and for each subscale total score, the majority of data seemed to
follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line (see
Appendix P). No outliers were identified. Generally, scores met both the visual and
numerical inspection criteria, such that data were assumed to be normally distributed.
Therefore, one-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to assess for change in
CAMI scores over time.
As completed for anxiety and depression scores, using planned comparisons,
coping scores (total and per subscale) were compared between Pre-1 and Pre-2, and
then between Pre-2 and Post using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. If no
significant differences were found between Pre-1 and Pre-2, then stability in
measurement would be assumed, and the Pre-2 and Post comparison would be tested
Scale
40
using contrasts to discern whether there was a significant reduction/increase in coping
post-intervention. As above, Bonferroni correction was used on the alpha level (α/2) =
.025 to control for the possibility of type I error (Field, 2013).
Changes in coping.
No violations of the Mauchly’s test checking the assumption of sphericity
were found in relation to changes in total coping or coping subscale analyses (p
> .05). No significant differences over time were found for overall coping [F(2, 26) =
1.79, p = .187], Managing Events/Problem-solving scores [F(2, 26) = 3.23, p = .056]
or Managing Meanings/Perceptions [F(2, 26) = .33, p = .723] (p > .025). As the p
value was close to .05 when assessing differences between Managing
Events/Problem-solving scores, planned contrasts were conducted. Planned contrasts
with Bonferroni correction (α = .025) revealed that there was no significant difference
between Managing Events/Problem-solving scores Pre-1 and Pre-2, F(1, 13) = 5.11, p
= .042, or between Pre-2 and Post, F(1, 13) = 1.79, p = .204. However, a p value close
to .025 suggested some evidence of a relationship between Pre-1 and Pre-2 scores
with these seeming to improve over time.
The results show that Managing Stress significantly changed over time F(2,
26) = 6.46, p = .005, ω2 = 0.05. Planned contrasts revealed there was no significant
difference between CAMI Managing Stress scores at Pre-1 to Pre-2, F(1, 13) =
< .001, p = 1.00. Planned contrasts showed that Managing Stress scores significantly
increased from Pre-2 to Post, F(1, 13) = 10.15, p = .007, r = 0.66 (large effect size,
see Figure 4). Therefore, participants’ coping ability in terms of managing stress
seemed to improve post-intervention.
41
Qualitative Analysis
Eleven participants (73%) reported using the relaxation audio 20 times, as
directed. Frequency of use by the other four participants was 14 times (n = 1), 10
times (n = 1) and less than half of the required amount (n = 2). Reasons given for not
meeting the target duration were limited time (n = 3) and memory lapses (n = 2).
Nine deductive themes were applied to the data; four related to core processes
of relaxation training and five derived from the effects of PMR and AR literature (see
Appendix Q for examples of initial codes and data related to each theme). Two
additional inductive themes were also derived from the data: ‘prioritising time’ and
‘positives of taking part’. Each theme is described and supported with quotes. A
credibility check of the theme: ‘Reduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive
afferent stimulation, such that training should take place in a quiet room.’ was
completed with an independent researcher and showed general agreement; the same
data was rated as demonstrating the theme by both researchers, although the
independent researcher also identified two additional responses which could illustrate
the theme (see Appendix R).
PMR process themes.
1) Relaxes a group of muscles which are acquainted in a certain order.
This theme describes muscles ‘relaxing after the cessation of impulses along
motor nerve fibres extending to a muscle’ (Jacobson, 1929, p.30; Jacobson, 1987).
This practiced relaxation occurs in the principle muscle-groups in the whole body in a
specific order each time (i.e. the same muscles are tensed and then relaxed in the same
42
sequence every day). Ten participants specifically spoke positively about relaxing
their muscles through completing PMR (see Table 9) and liked being talked through
the exercises:
P7: ‘relaxing, took some physical tension away.... was good being talked
through exercises and talking through tensing muscles’.
Table 9
Quotes representing ‘relaxes a group of muscles which are acquainted in a certain
order’
Quote Participant
‘clenching muscles is really good’ 10
‘felt it's worked at the end and felt better for doing it. Didn't realise wasn't relaxed but felt better afterwards. Liked working through my body - especially eyebrows’
13
‘body relaxes and found I relax with it’ 14
2) Practises from day to day tending towards a state in which quiet is
automatically maintained.
This theme designates the need to practise PMR each day and ‘progress
toward a habit of repose’ (Jacobson, 1987, p. 76). This suggests that a state of quiet is
achieved by doing away with residual tension as a result of completing the exercises
in sequence day-to-day. Whilst none of the participants made explicit reference to
maintaining a state of quiet, there was some evidence that participants found their
minds wandered less over time and they ruminated less on experiences (see Table 10)
which could be indicative of quieter experience. Moreover, participants thought they
43
felt calmer (less anxious) as a result of the exercises which was perceived as a benefit
to them.
Table 10
Quotes representing ‘practises from day to day tending towards a state in which quiet
is automatically maintained’
Quote Participant
‘Helps if it's all feeling a bit much, calming, help you to feel better’ 16
‘not been as calm when not used it (snapped more)’ 8
‘Found it difficult at times with the mind wandering - more practice made it easier’
13
‘gradually you get to a point where you are calm after it’ 15
AR process themes.
1) Reduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive afferent stimulation, such
that training should take place in a quiet room.
This theme suggests that for stimulation to be reduced that the ‘exercise
should take place in a quiet room with moderate temperature and reduced
illumination; restricting clothes should be loosened or removed’ (Kanji, 1997, p.163).
While participants did not make direct reference to temperature, illumination or their
clothes, five participants reported completing the exercises in a quiet environment
aided relaxation (see Table 11) and helped provide less distraction:
P2: ‘In the living room with laptop. No distractions. Quiet environment’.
44
Participants also usually completed the exercises in the same place each day,
which could be as a result of that place in the house being quieter. Completing the
exercises at times when it was quieter could further reduce external stimulation
through there being fewer perceived demands from others, such as the person they
care for. It also could be argued that most participants (53%) may have completed the
exercises at the start (n = 4) or end of the day (n = 4) to allow for less illumination to
be present.
Table 11
Quotes illustrating ‘reduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive afferent
stimulation, such that training should take place in a quiet room’
Quote Participant
‘First thing in the morning, before breakfast was best for me. Couldn't do it during the day, it was too noisy and distracting.’
15
‘Mainly evening about 7pm (before settling down to the telly). Chose to complete it at this time because no demands’
9
‘Sat in armchair in the lounge, less distraction’ 8
‘Same place in the kitchen - Sat in armchair in the lounge, easier to do it sitting up than lying down. Less distraction’
13
2) Mental repetition of psychophysiologically adapted verbal formulae,
whereby mental activity is conceived as ‘passive concentration’.
This theme involves participants ‘repeating a formula in his or her mind which
is deemed as passive concentration’ (Kanji, 1997, p. 163). This concentration is
centred on creating ‘mental contact with the part of the body indicated by the
autogenic formula’. For example, the audio instructed participants to, “focus your
passive attention on your arms and repeat the following: ‘my right arm is heavy’”.
45
Largely, participants described a progression whereby the more they did the
exercises, the more they enjoyed and improved at them. Kanji (1997) suggested that
the depth of relaxation should build up over time following practice. Some
participants stated that initially their mind wandered more and practice made it easier
to maintain concentration (see Table 12). However, one participant said that they
found it more difficult to maintain concentration towards the end of the month of
training.
Two participants disliked saying the statements to themselves and reported not
to find this relaxing. Other participants seemed to have read about how AR works and
found this helped them to complete the mental repetition exercises.
Table 12
Quotes illustrating “mental repetition of psychophysiologically adapted verbal
formulae, whereby mental activity is conceived as ‘passive concentration’”
Quote Participant
‘More did it, enjoyed it more.’ 9
‘Get better at it as you know it more’ 11
‘Harder to maintain concentration when doing it as time went on.’ 2
‘Was a slow start getting used to it and the voice and the gaps in between. After a week, it went swimmingly.’
15
‘Difficult to talk through saying statements to themselves, goes against my nature.... Preferred the first [PMR] one.’
3
‘Saying feeling relaxed made me feel more awake’ 10
The literature set out three likely effects of PMR and six likely effects of AR.
These were then merged to create two likely effects of PMR and three likely effects of
46
AR due to conceptual overlap (see Appendix M). These were used as themes to
explore whether participants experienced these predicted outcomes.
Effects of PMR.
1) Releasing the tension of muscles.
This theme overlaps with the core processes of PMR and as such evidence for
this outcome has been detailed above. This illustrates participants’ positive experience
of relaxation as a result of releasing the tension in their muscles.
2) Absence of thinking and the control of images and attention.
This theme relates to Jacobson’s (1987) suppositions that intense focus on
muscles eliminates the occurrence of thinking, and that when muscles are completely
relaxed, mental images will not be experienced at the same time. Daily practice at
controlling muscles is also seen to improve attention. As previously discussed, the
majority of participants found over time that they focused more easily on the PMR
exercises. Overall, this increased focus was considered to be easier to achieve whilst
completing PMR compared to AR, with four participants reporting they preferred
PMR compared to AR (see Table 13). A benefit was also described in terms of
focusing on muscles rather than attending to thoughts:
P15: ‘Makes you focus on something, rather than silly little things that go
through my mind. Feel calmer than before.’.
47
This participant also said that they were more able to control thoughts as time
progressed. Further evidence of the absence of thinking is provided by three
participants reporting that they could have fallen asleep during practice. Conversely,
another participant described a benefit of the exercises being that they made them
think more.
Specifically, in relation to attention, three participants identified noise as a
particular factor hindering their attention when attempting to complete the exercises.
As previously discussed, this was managed by finding the quietest room in the house
to complete the exercises.
Table 13
Quotes illustrating ‘absence of thinking and the control of images and attention’
Quote Participant
‘Mind didn’t wander as much, could focus easier 8
‘Occasionally mind could wander at the beginning, had to be disciplined to stop mind from wandering ... able to control my mind and thoughts easier as time went on’
15
‘Nearly fell asleep a couple of times (not usually a good sleeper) .... Found it easier to bring my mind to it when doing the PMR exercises, rather than the later tape, mind wandered more - just what my mind does’
9
‘Found it difficult at times with the mind wandering - more practice made it easier’
13
‘Think I fell asleep once.... Made you stop and think about other things, especially once you'd done the exercises before resuming your day - thought about the exercises I'd just done. Made you think.’
18
Effects of AR.
3) ‘Counteracting of acute stress or fatigue’.
48
This theme is defined by the counteracting of acute stress or fatigue as ‘mental
and physical refreshment being provided’ (Kanji, 1997, p. 164). All 15 participants
provided a response which fitted into this theme, and consequently represented the
most common effect of the relaxation training. Specifically, 11 participants said that
they felt more relaxed through completing the training (see Table 14), which suggests
that stress had been reduced. For example, one participant noted the refreshment as a
result of relaxing:
P14: ‘Made me have a rest from what I was doing - which I wouldn't normally
do, taking time out, relaxing’.
This reduction in stress could be explained through completing breathing
exercises. Deep breaths could activate the parasympathetic nervous system and, in
turn, decrease the activity in the sympathetic system (Carruthers, 1979, p. 437).
Participants reported the exercises helped them sleep better, thus helping
combat fatigue and aid mental and physical rejuvenation. Better sleep can have a
positive impact on mental health (Freeman et al., 2017). Feeling calmer was also
stated by numerous participants. This could indicate a decrease of stress and anxiety
whilst completing the training and subsequently afterwards, such as when helping
manage challenging behaviour. Feeling calmer also seemed to be influenced by the
voice on the tracks which was described as ‘very soothing’, although one participant
thought the words could have been said in a softer tone at times.
49
Table 14
Quotes demonstrating ‘counteracting of acute stress or fatigue’
Quote Participant(s)
‘it was relaxing’ 11
‘relaxed when doing it. Took me away from my day’ 12
‘Breathing - do start to relax’ 9
‘Breathing exercises were very relaxing’ 10
‘Helped me go to sleep’ 3, 6
‘very relaxing, very nice when get to used to’ 16
‘Not been as calm when not used it (snapped more). Don't challenge things as much, found it helpful. Possibly reacted better with (removed) challenging behaviour’
8
4) Achieve peace of mind.
This theme is described as ‘the extent to which one experiences inner peace
and harmony’ (Lee, Lin, Huang, & Fredrickson, 2013). It relates to the reduction of
proprioceptive afferent stimulation as this could support the occurrence of peace of
mind (Kanji, 1997). Although participants did not report explicitly experiencing inner
peace or harmony, their comments indicated their state of mind have changed in a
beneficial way (see Table 15). For example, one participant said that their ‘mind goes
back to a certain position’, which was described as being in response to feeling
50
calmer. Another participant said that the exercises ‘put you in a better frame of mind’
which resulted in them coping with situations better and being able to focus more
easily. This arguably could suggest that the mind is more peaceful and less anxious.
Similarly, developing patience was considered to be a positive outcome after
completing the training. This could have been experienced as a result of a quietening
of proprioceptive stimulation.
Table 15
Quotes demonstrating ‘achieve peace of mind’
Quote Participant
‘Helped during the day to be a little more patient, a little less het up about things’
6
‘Put you in a better frame of mind with it than without it’ 8
‘Help concentrate on one thing - like a hobby. Can switch off from things around you. Difficult to quantify what's changed. Mind goes back to a certain position.’
15
5) Cope with life’s pressures and improve coping abilities.
This theme concerns improving participants’ ability to cope with life stressors.
Four participants said the training helped them to focus on something different and
feel calmer (see Table 16). This could be related to helping them cope with the
demands of caring. Other participants made specific reference to life events that may
have been impacting on their ability to cope. Some participants found that, with these
events happening, it was more difficult to complete the training. Conversely, others
said the training helped them cope with the events, and found it easier to fit into their
day than they had expected.
51
Table 16
Quotes illustrating ‘cope with life’s pressures and improve coping abilities’
Quote Participant
‘it was effective and can focus on something completely different’ 13
‘coped better’ 8
‘calmed me down a bit. In spite of everything else going on around me’ 14
Interviewer asked if they would continue using the relaxation: ‘yes definitely, and at work too because of the benefit.’
9
‘Bit of trouble fitting it in around all that I do.’ 1
‘three funerals in one week, disc helped me to cope.’ 10
‘Need to try and get a routine, there isn't one at the moment - things are manic and the days go.’
12
‘Some nights finding 20 minutes would be a struggle to find [they thought this] but thought it was actually all okay in the end.’
7
Additional themes.
1) Prioritising time.
Participants referred to the impact of training in various ways. For instance, in
relation to how the training allowed them to have time to themselves, and how their
perception of time influenced them completing the training (see Table 17). Overall,
participants reported a positive impact of completing the relaxation in terms of it
allowing them to dedicate time to themselves. Conversely, for participants who did
52
not complete the required amount of training, three of them explained this was due to
the lack of time they had, and within this one participant thought the audio could be
shorter.
Table 17
Quotes illustrating ‘Impact of time’
Quote Participant
‘Nice to have a quarter of an hour to myself’ 9
‘Takes time out for the self a little’ 14
‘Haven’t had the time’ 11
‘When got time to myself, did it with everything else I needed to do’ 12
‘In reality I don't get enough time to complete it’ 16
‘If having a difficult time, would take time out to do it’ 9
2) Positives of taking part.
Caregivers expressed wanting to continue using the relaxation training (n =
14, 93%, see Table 18). Some stated this would not be as regularly as set out in the
study, but when specific circumstances arose (e.g., if they were sleeping poorly or if a
stressful life event occurred). One participant said that they would continue using it if
it included music, and another participant desired a variety of tracks to continue
practising with. Generally, participants said that they were pleased to have taken part
in the research; some expressed telling other caregivers about it. Positive experiences
included reports from participants who said that they were initially sceptical about the
relaxation being helpful. Numerous participants found completing the relaxation
53
exercises created a new, beneficial experience for them, with some now reporting
being more able to pay attention to the present and future as opposed to being focused
on the past. Participants also spoke of the lack of support for long-term caregivers,
such that taking part had been a good experience in this regard. However, they also
recognised that the training could have been useful earlier post-stroke.
Table 18
Quotes illustrating ‘Positive of taking part’
Quote Participant
‘Yes, felt it was of benefit to me personally. Could see how it could have helped in the early years post-stroke.... doesn’t dwell on what’s happened. Looking forward and being in the moment. Doesn't remember this kind of thing being offered when the stroke happened. I will tell others that I've taken part in this’
2
‘I'll carry on listening to it because feels it's working.... Was very sceptical about it working but thought it has been helpful’
1
‘Yes, will continue but possibly not as regular (every day) because think it would be useful, less snappy, less stroppy’
8
‘Yes, would like to continue, it was helpful’ 15
‘Really good thing because people don't think about carers, don't ask how they are’
10
‘If people are wary of it, give it a go because it's surprising how quickly you can feel relaxed.’
16
‘Very sceptical originally about relaxation techniques, felt they wouldn't help and would do the opposite. May still get a little het up or angry but can let off steam and that's not how it was in the past. Also can dwell on this things less’
6
Discussion
The results of this study provide evidence for the effectiveness of self-help
progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and autogenic relaxation (AR) training for
stroke caregivers. The main hypothesis was supported; anxiety was shown to
54
significantly reduce following the completion of the relaxation training for one month.
Similarly, the hypothesis that depression would significantly reduce after using the
relaxation training was supported. The hypothesis that coping would significantly
improve was only partly supported, as only coping in relation to managing stress
improved significantly. The qualitative findings allowed further understanding of the
possible bases for the significant changes observed and were consistent with theory
and past research involving PMR and AR training.
Improvement in anxiety was evidenced for the HADS-A and BAI, both with
large effect sizes demonstrating convergent validity. This finding mirrors the large
effect found by Golding et al. (2016), who used the same relaxation protocol with
stroke survivors. It is also consistent with systematic literature and meta-analytic
reviews which report beneficial effects of relaxation training for anxiety (Manzoni et
al., 2008; Pagnini et al., 2013). Improvement in anxiety could be a result of the
relaxation training involving deep breathing, as this could have activated the
parasympathetic nervous system (Carruthers, 1979). This in turn could have led to a
decrease in physiological arousal, through decreasing the activity in the sympathetic
system, which counteracts the stress response of anxiety (Esch, et al., 2003; Steinhardt
& Dolbier, 2008). Evidence for this response is further supported by participants
reporting they felt calmer and more relaxed. Whilst a possible explanation for the
significant results could be that caregivers dedicated time to themselves (e.g. 20
minutes per day), rather than that the effects were as a result of the relaxation training
specifically, this seems unlikely. It could be argued that by dedicating time to oneself,
it is unlikely caregivers would find their muscles relaxed in the specific way they
reported (i.e. after tensing them), nor that they would be able to pay more attention to
55
their breath and/or be able to focus on something different without being given
something different to focus on. For instance, if participants struggled with
rumination and they did not focus on something specific in the dedicated time for
themselves each day, caregivers could have ruminated more and felt more depressed
and anxious in mood. This is because chronic stressors (e.g. being a caregiver) can be
linked with rumination as the chronic stressor of being a caregiver could create
discrepancies between the caregiver’s current state and their goals or desired states
(Michl, McLaughlin, Shepherd, & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2013). This seemed not to
happen as anxiety and depression were lower, therefore the results may be unable to
be explained wholly through caregivers dedicating more time to themselves each day.
As predicted due to the high co-morbidity between anxiety and depression
(Hirschfield, 2001; Kessler et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2017), depression also reduced
significantly. This was encouraging as it could suggest that relaxation training may be
beneficial for more than solely anxiety. The stress-coping model could explain why
indicators of depression might change following relaxation training. As a result of
reducing physiological arousal and anxiety, participants may then be less distracted by
worrying/negative thoughts (Asare & Danquah, 2017) when planning activities or
engaging with activities, hence more enjoyment was felt. This would fit with
Jacobson’s premise behind PMR that when the residual tension of muscles was
relaxed, this could eliminate the occurrence of thinking, and as such worry (Carlson &
Hoyle, 1993), which may then generalise to after practice. For instance, through
directing attention onto controlling muscles, and practising this each day, this could
improve attention and reduce anxiety (Jacobson, 1987). This has been shown in
experimental research whereby participants were found to feel more relaxed, be less
56
physiologically aroused and complete tasks faster following PMR, which was
suggested to also indicate improved attention (Scheufele, 2000). In this study’s
interviews, participants also reported experiencing less distraction due to
worrying/negative thoughts. For example, as one participant remarked the training
enabled them to stop focussing on ‘silly thoughts’. Therefore, the quantitative and
qualitative data suggested that anxiety and depression improved following relaxation
training.
Coping was only found to improve in relation to managing stress. This is
consistent with the stress-coping model; stress may have reduced through relaxing the
mind and body, which could then lead to participants perceiving that their internal
resources have increased in relation to their external demands (Goodman & Ley,
2012). This could happen as a result of reduced physiological arousal and anxiety.
Consequently, participants may perceive that they were better able to manage stress
and demands.
Conversely, there was less evidence that managing events/problem-solving
and managing meanings/perceptions aspects of coping significantly changed post-
intervention. For instance, Managing Events/Problem-solving scores showed some
evidence of improving over time, between Pre-1 and Pre-2 (p = .042), but this was
before the intervention occurred. Nonetheless, these aspects of coping may require a
different intervention, which specifically targets these abilities and/or they may need
more than one month to change. For example, Brereton et al.’s (2007) systematic
review included a study that found problem-solving skills significantly improved in
stroke caregivers after a three-month problem-solving intervention (Grant, Elliott,
Weaver, Bartolucci, & Giger, 2002). In terms of managing meanings/perceptions, the
57
stress-coping model may not predict that this would be likely to change quickly as a
result of reduced anxiety. This could be because this subscale arguably reflects more
stable, attitude-related cognitive coping strategies that caregivers use to perceive
events (Nolan et al., 1995), rather than ways of coping that may change more as a
result of their transient state of mind/anxiety, which could be relaxed during the
training. Therefore, it could be a strength of the study that this subscale was not
shown to change because it was not predicted by theory, and could henceforth
indicate less biased reporting by caregivers. The lack of change in these two subscales
would explain why the overall coping score did not change despite improvement in
managing stress scores. This also underlined the importance of assessing aspects of
coping separately. As the results suggest the types of coping are distinct, and only
managing stress was impacted by the relaxation training, different interventions might
be required to target the other types of coping.
Poorer internal consistency was found for the Managing Meanings/Perceptions
subscale in this study compared to in past research (Llewellyn et al., 2003). Test re-
test reliability of the CAMI was also not evidenced previously (Harvey et al., 2005).
However, the qualitative data suggested some change in relation to ‘coping better’ in
the interviews and attributed this to the relaxation. In future research, coping measures
that have evidenced sensitivity to change over short time periods, good internal
consistency and good test re-test reliability should be used.
The results suggested participants showed good treatment fidelity and reported
beneficial effects of this. For instance, only three participants withdrew from the study
due to reasons unrelated to the intervention. Treatment fidelity could be evidenced
through almost 75% of participants reporting using the relaxation training for the
58
recommended number of times or more, and comments indicating that they followed
the proposed structure of the training. However, future research could be completed to
corroborate self-report fidelity to the intervention by using more objective outcome
measures, in addition to asking participants at the end of the month how many times
they completed the training, based on the paper diary sheet provided. For example, an
online system could record each time participants listened to the audio in full or
participants could register each time they used the relaxation CD via an online
recording system, as near to the moment after they completed it, as this could enhance
the validity of the self-reported training usage. In terms of effects, the current findings
supported previous findings in the literature where PMR and AR were described to
help counteract fatigue, achieve more peace of mind and improve attention (Jacobson,
1987; Kanji, 1997). As positive findings were triangulated across quantitative and
qualitative findings, whereby the hypotheses were supported and the qualitative data
supported the proposed mechanisms of action, this provided evidence for the use of a
mixed methods approach and data were thus less likely to be biased (Jick, 1979;
Johnstone, 2004). This was corroborated further as participants’ responses generally
followed the predicted effects of the relaxation training when asked open questions
about what their experience of the training was.
Implications for Clinical Practice / Future Research
To determine whether the effectiveness of self-help relaxation training is
maintained a follow-up study would be required. Golding, Fife-Schaw, and Kneebone
(2017) conducted a 12-month follow-up of relaxation training for anxiety in stroke
survivors, and found that reduction in anxiety was maintained between pre-
intervention and follow-up (p < .001). Overall, 75% of participants completed the
59
study at follow-up (Golding et al., 2017) which suggested that this follow-up method
and time period was generally feasible, and that the results were not overly biased.
Likewise, anxiety was measured over the telephone using the HADS-A, which could
be replicated in a follow-up of this current study to establish whether gains are
maintained.
To ascertain whether self-help relaxation training could lead to cost savings
and be cost-efficient, future research could compare the usage and cost of services
(e.g., GP visits and drug costs associated with this, and support provided for stroke
survivors, see Mavranezouli et al., 2015) by stroke caregivers using relaxation
training, with a waiting list control group. Additionally, this intervention falls within
the lower end, in terms of cost, of psychological treatments for anxiety. To illustrate
this, Golding et al. (2017) estimated the cost of creating the CD, posting it to
participants and telephone contact time during the study at £57 per participant, which
was in line with the cost of guided bibliotherapy or a psychoeducation group for
anxiety in the general population (£36–£150 per person, National Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence, 2011). The cost of this intervention would likely be similar
as it involved posting out fewer CDs and comparable telephone contact time (at Pre-2
and Post), and therefore provides a cost-efficient way of effectively reducing anxiety.
In the recent literature, there has been a growing emphasis on conducting
interventions which involve the stroke survivor and their caregiver to better meet both
of their needs. Healthiness of stroke caregivers has been shown related to better long-
term rehabilitation outcome and quality of life in stroke survivors (Bakas et al., 2017;
McCurley et al., 2018; Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010; van Exel et al., 2004). Given
the positive effects of this training on stroke survivors previously (Golding et al.,
60
2016, 2017), it could be useful to investigate the impact of stroke survivors and
caregivers completing this relaxation training together, especially as one caregiver
reported that the stroke survivor they supported spontaneously joined them and
completed the relaxation training also.
Whilst this study has shown relaxation training to be effective in caregivers
many years post-stroke, to determine whether there is a type of stroke caregiver who
could be more likely to benefit from the training, future research with more
participants is needed. For example, in a recent systematic review of the literature
investigating what factors influence anxiety in stroke caregivers (Csecs et al., 2019), it
was found that caregivers experiencing high levels of burden and/or those who were
female were more likely to be anxious. Therefore, it would be interesting to explore
whether this could translate into who could be more likely to benefit from this
intervention (i.e. whether caregivers experiencing higher burden and/or female
caregivers experience significantly larger reductions in anxiety following relaxation
training), as funding is becoming more limited to those at greatest risk (Robertson,
Wenzel, Thompson, & Charles, 2017).
Strengths and Limitations
Providing an intervention that participants completed at home could minimise
accessibility problems, which stroke caregivers have previously reported in relation to
accessing psychological support (Martin et al., 2002; McCurley et al., 2018). Offering
options for participants in how they completed measures at Pre-1 and how they
received the relaxation audios was a strength of the study, which may also have
helped sufficient numbers of caregivers to participate, enabling adequate power to be
achieved. However, by providing options, there was the possibility that there was a
61
difference in anxiety change scores between participants who completed measures at
Pre-1 using different methods. Unfortunately, the numbers in these groups were too
small to test for these potential differences (e.g. four participants completed the
measures over the telephone). Nonetheless, previous research involving caregivers of
stroke survivors has shown there were no significant differences between caregivers
who completed the HADS-A over the telephone and face-to-face (Hoffmann et al.,
2010). Although this does not compare with online or postal surveys, evidence was
not available to compare these methods as generally research with stroke caregivers
has been conducted face-to-face. Furthermore, the levels of anxiety reported in this
study were similar to those reported in face-to-face interviews previously (mean
HADS-A scores = 8 and 9 respectively, Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010; Jaracz,
Grabowska-Fudala, Górna, & Kozubski, 2014). As such, the method of administration
of outcome measures may not lead to different reports of anxiety in stroke caregivers.
A key limitation of the study is the lack of a control or comparison group. This
would be needed to provide more evidence that positive changes were due to the
intervention (Medical Research Council, 2019). Future research could compare the
effectiveness of usage of relaxation training to a waiting-list control group. If results
are replicated, this would add reliability and validity to the current findings. If
positive results are found, this self-help relaxation training could be offered more
widely to caregivers of long-term stroke survivors, which would be positive given the
current reported lack of support available (Jaracz et al., 2015) and its potential to be
cost-effective.
It must be noted that this study did not exclude participants based on the level
of their anxiety due to the expected high levels of anxiety present in stroke caregivers
62
(Choi-Kwon et al., 2005; Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010). Therefore, it remains
possible that the effectiveness of this intervention may be different if the sample
involved only those who scored in the clinical range of anxiety.
Conclusion
This study provided evidence for the effectiveness of self-help relaxation
training for anxiety and depression reduction in long-term caregivers of stroke
survivors. Improvement in coping skills in terms of managing stress was also found.
These findings were shown using quantitative and qualitative data, thus supporting the
use of mixed methods approaches in this area of research. Whilst other types of
coping did not improve, reasons for this have been suggested in terms of the types of
coping assessed and the reliability of measures. Future research is required to
ascertain whether the results are maintained at follow-up and whether there are factors
which influence the likelihood of improvement.
63
References
Adamson, J., Beswick, A., & Ebrahim, S. (2004). Is stroke the most common cause of
disability? Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 13(4), 171–177.
doi://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.06.003
Alexander, T., & Wilz, G. (2010). Family caregivers: Gender differences in
adjustment to stroke survivors' mental changes. Rehabilitation Psychology, 55(2),
159–169. doi:10.1037/a0019253
Anderson, R. (1992). The aftermath of stroke: The experience of patients and their
families. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511983238
Asare, M., & Danquah, S. (2017). The need for clearance in relaxation therapy:
Development of the relaxation clearance tool for practitioners. Journal of
General Practice, 05(04). doi: 10.4172/2329-9126.1000324
Bakas, T. T., McCarthy, T. M., & Miller, T. E. (2017). Update on the state of the
evidence for stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions. Stroke, 48(5), e125.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016052
64
Banks, L., J., & Marotta, A., C. (2007). Outcomes validity and reliability of the
Modified Rankin Scale: Implications for stroke clinical trials: A literature review
and synthesis. Stroke, 38(3), 1091–1096.
doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for
measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893–897. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
Beck A., & Steer, R. (1993). BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, SA:
Psychological Corporation.
Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A
literature review on restorativeness. Behavioural Sciences (Basel, Switzerland),
4(4), 394. doi:10.3390/bs4040394
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. Journal of
Psychosomatic Research, 52(2), 69–77. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3
Brereton, L., Carroll, C., & Barnston, S. (2007). Interventions for adult family carers
of people who have had a stroke: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation,
21(10), 867–884. doi:10.1177/0269215507078313
Carlson, C. R., & Hoyle, R. H. (1993). Efficacy of abbreviated progressive muscle
relaxation training: A quantitative review of behavioural medicine research.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(6), 1059–v1067.
doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.6.1059
65
Carruthers, M. (1979). Autogenic training. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 23(6),
437–440. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(79)90059-X
Cheng, H. Y., Chair, S. Y., & Chau, J. P. (2014). The effectiveness of psychosocial
interventions for stroke family caregivers and stroke survivors: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Patient Education & Counselling, 95(1), 30–44.
doi://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.005
Choi-Kwon, S., Kim, H., Kwon, S. U., & Kim, J. S. (2005). Factors affecting the
burden on caregivers of stroke survivors in South Korea. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(5), 1043–1048. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.013
Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Csecs, J., Thompson, H., & Simonds, L. (2019). Factors influencing anxiety in
caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors: A systematic review
(unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Surrey: England.
Cuijpers, P., & Schuurmans, J. (2007). Self-help interventions for anxiety disorders:
An overview. Current Psychiatry Reports, 9(4), 284–290. doi:10.1007/s11920-
007-0034-6
Cumming, T. B., Cadilhac, D. A., Rubin, G., Crafti, N., & Pearce, D. C. (2008).
Psychological distress and social support in informal caregivers of stroke
survivors. Brain Impairment, 9(2), 152–169. doi:10.1375/brim.9.2.152
66
Curry, L. A., Krumholz, H. M., O’Cathain, A., Plano Clark, V. L., Cherlin, H. E., &
Bradley, E. H. (2013). Mixed methods in biomedical and health services
research. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 6(1), 119–123.
doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967885
Dankner, R., Bachner, Y. G., Ginsberg, G., Ziv, A., Ben David, H., Litmanovitch-
Goldstein, D, ... Greenberg, D. (2016). Correlates of well-being among
caregivers of long-term community-dwelling stroke survivors. International
Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 39(4), 326–330.
doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000192
Dettmers, C., Teske, U., Hamzei, F., Uswatte, G., Taub, E., & Weiller, C. (2005).
Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional
outcome and quality of life after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, 86(2), 204–209. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.05.007
Draper, P., & Brocklehurst, H. (2007). The impact of stroke on the well‐being of the
patient's spouse: An exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(2), 264–
271. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01575.x
Eldred, C., & Sykes, C. (2008). Psychosocial interventions for carers of survivors of
stroke: A systematic review of interventions based on psychological principles
and theoretical frameworks. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 563.
Esch, T., Fricchione, G. L., & Stefano, G. B. (2003). The therapeutic use of the
relaxation response in stress-related diseases. Medical Science Monitor:
67
International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 9(2),
RA23.
Fan, W., & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A
systematic review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26(2), 132–139.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible
statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical
sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
doi:10.3758/BF03193146
Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics and sex and
drugs and rock 'n' roll (4th ed.) Los Angeles, LA: SAGE.
Fisher, A., P., & Laschinger, S., H. (2001). A relaxation training program to increase
self-efficacy for anxiety control in Alzheimer family caregivers. Holistic Nursing
Practice, 15(2), 47–58. doi:10.1097/00004650-200101000-00008
Freeman, D., Sheaves, B., Goodwin, G. M., Yu, L. M., Nickless, A., Harrison, P. J, ...
Espie, C. A. (2017). The effects of improving sleep on mental health (OASIS): A
randomised controlled trial with mediation analysis. Lancet Psychiatry, 4(10),
749–758.
Geiger, P., Boggero, I., Brake, C., Caldera, C., Combs, H., Peters, J., & Baer, R.
(2015). Mindfulness-based interventions for older adults: A review of the effects
on physical and emotional well-being. Mindfulness, 7(2), 296–307. doi:
10.1007/s12671-015-0444-1
68
Glass, A., T., Matchar, B., D., Belyea, R., M., & Feussner, R. J. (1993). Impact of
social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke, 24(1), 64–70.
doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.1.64
Golding, K., Fife-Schaw, C., & Kneebone, I. (2017). Twelve month follow-up on a
randomised controlled trial of relaxation training for post-stroke anxiety. Clinical
Rehabilitation, 31(9), 1164–1167. doi:10.1177/0269215516682820
Golding, K., Kneebone, I., & Fife-Schaw, C. (2016). Self-help relaxation for post-
stroke anxiety: A randomised, controlled pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation,
30(2), 174–180. doi:10.1177/0269215515575746
Goodman, B., & Ley, T. (2012). Psychology and Sociology in Nursing. Exeter,
England: Learning Matters.
Gottschall, A. C., West, S. G., & Enders, C. K. (2012). A comparison of item-level
and scale-level multiple imputation for questionnaire batteries. Multivariate
Behavioural Research, 47(1), 1–25. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.640589
Grant, J. S., Elliott, T. R., Newman Giger, J., & Bartolucci, A. A. (2002). Telephone
intervention with family caregivers of stroke survivors after rehabilitation.
Stroke, 33, 2060–2065.
Greenwood, N., & Mackenzie, A. (2010). An exploratory study of anxiety in carers of
stroke survivors. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(13–14), 2032–2038.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03163.x
69
Halcomb, E., & Hickman, L. (2015). Mixed methods research. Nursing Standard
(Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 29(32), 41.
doi:10.7748/ns.29.32.41.e8858
Han, B., & Haley, W. E. (1999). Family caregiving for patients with stroke: Review
and analysis. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 30(7), 1478–1485.
doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1478
Hansson, M., Chotai, J., Nordstöm, A., & Bodlund, O. (2009). Comparison of two
self-rating scales to detect depression: HADS and PHQ-9. The British Journal of
General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners,
59(566), e283. doi:10.3399/bjgp09X454070
Harris, L. E., Weinberger, M., & Tierney, W. M. (1997). Assessing inner-city
patients' hospital experiences: A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus
mailed surveys. Medical Care, 35(1), 70–76. doi:10.1097/00005650-199701000-
00006
Hartke, R. J., & King, R. B. (2003). Telephone group intervention for older stroke
caregivers. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 9(4), 65–81. doi:10.1310/RX0A-
6E2Y-BU8J-W0VL
Harvey, K., Langman, A., Winfield, H., Catty, J., Clement S., White, S, … Burns, T.
(2005). Measuring outcomes for carers for people with mental health problems.
Retrieved March 25, 2019, from
http://www.netscc.ac.uk/hsdr/files/project/SDO_ES_08-1311-047_V01.pdf
70
Herrmann, C. (1997). International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and
Depression Scale: A review of validation data and clinical results. Journal of
Psychosomatic Research, 42(1), 17–41. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(96)00216-4
Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (2001). The comorbidity of major depression and anxiety
disorders: Recognition and management in primary care. Primary Care
Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 3(6), 244.
Hoffmann, T., Worrall, L., Eames, S., & Ryan, A. (2010). Measuring outcomes in
people who have had a stroke and their carers: Can the telephone be used?
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(2), 119–127. doi:10.1310/tsr1702-119
Jacobson, E. (1929). Progressive relaxation. Oxford, England: University of Chicago
Press.
Jacobson, E. (1987). Progressive relaxation (as a psychotherapeutic technique, reprint
of 1925 article) [Special centennial issue]. American Journal of Psychology,
100(3-4), 522–537. doi:10.2307/1422693
Jaracz, K., Grabowska-Fudala, B., Górna, K., Jaracz, J., Moczko, J., & Kozubski, W.
(2015). Burden in caregivers of long-term stroke survivors: Prevalence and
determinants at 6 months and 5 years after stroke. Patient Education and
Counselling, 98(8), 1011–1016. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.008
Jaracz, K., Grabowska-Fudala, B., Górna, K., & Kozubski, W. (2014). Caregiving
burden and its determinants in Polish caregivers of stroke survivors. Archives of
Medical Science, 5, 941–950. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.46214
71
Jarvis, A., Worth, A., & Porter, M. (2006). The experience of caring for someone over
75 years of age: Results from a Scottish general practice population. Journal of
Clinical Nursing, 15(11), 1450–1459. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01463.x
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in
action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. doi:10.2307/2392366
Johnstone, P. L. (2004). Mixed methods, mixed methodology health services research
in practice. Qualitative Health Research, 14(2), 259–271.
doi:10.1177/1049732303260610
Kalra, L., Evans, A., Perez, I., Melbourn, A., Patel, A., Knapp, M., & Donaldson, N.
(2004). Training carers of stroke patients: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ,
328(7448), 1099. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1099
Kanji, N. (1997). Autogenic training. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 5(3),
162–167. doi:10.1016/S0965-2299(97)80060-X
Kassab, R., & Alexandre, F. (2015). Integration of exteroceptive and interoceptive
information within the hippocampus: A computational study. Frontiers in
Systems Neuroscience, 9. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00087
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R, ...
Wang, P. S. (2003). The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results
from the national comorbidity survey replication (NCS-R). JAMA, 289(23),
3095–3105. doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3095
72
Lai, S., & Duncan, P. W. (1999). Evaluation of the American heart association stroke
outcome classification. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 30(9), 1840–
1843. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.9.1840
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY:
Springer.
Lee, Y., Lin, Y., Huang, C., & Fredrickson, B. (2013). The construct and
measurement of peace of mind. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 571–590.
doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9343-5
Legg, L., Quinn, T., Mahmood, F., Weir, C., Tierney, J., & Stott, D, … Langhorne, P.
(2011). Non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers of stroke survivors.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:
10.1002/14651858.cd008179.pub2
Llewellyn, G., Gething, L., Kendig, H., & Cant, R. (2003). Invisible carers: Facing
an uncertain future. Retrieved March 25, 2019, from http://sydney.edu.au/health-
sciences/afdsrc/docs/invisible.pdf
Lui, M. H., Lee, D. T. F., Greenwood, N., & Ross, F. M. (2012). Informal stroke
caregivers' self-appraised problem-solving abilities as a predictor of well-being
and perceived social support. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(1-2), 232–242.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03742.x
Lundh, U. (1999). Family carers 3: Coping strategies among family carers in Sweden.
British Journal of Nursing, 8(11), 735–740. doi:10.12968/bjon.1999.8.11.6591
73
Macnamara, S. E., Gummow, L. J., Goka, R., & Gregg, C. H. (1990). Caregiver
strain: Need for late post-stroke intervention. Rehabilitation Psychology, 35(2),
71–78. doi:10.1037/h0079051
Manzoni, G., Pagnini, F., Castelnuovo, G., & Molinari, E. (2008). Relaxation training
for anxiety: A ten-year systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry,
8(41). doi:10.1186/1471-244X-8-41
Martin, B. J., Yip, B., Hearty, M., Marietta, S., & Hill, R. (2002). Outcome,
functional recovery and unmet needs following acute stroke: Experience of
patient follow up at 6 to 9 months in a newly established stroke service. Scottish
Medical Journal, 47(6), 136–137. doi:10.1177/003693300204700605
Matthieu, M. M., & Ivanoff, A. (2006). Using stress, appraisal, and coping theories in
clinical practice: Assessments of coping strategies after disasters. Brief
Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 6(4), 337–348.
doi:10.1093/brief-treatment/mhl009
Mavranezouli, I., Mayo-Wilson, E., Dias, S., Kew, K., Clark, D. M., Ades, A. E., &
Pilling, S. (2015). The cost effectiveness of psychological and pharmacological
interventions for social anxiety disorder: A model-based economic analysis.
PLoS ONE, 10(10) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140704
Mazza, G. L., Enders, C. K., & Ruehlman, L. S. (2015). Addressing item-level
missing data: A comparison of proration and full information maximum
likelihood estimation. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 50(5), 00.
doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1068157
74
McCurley, J., Funes, C., Zale, E., Lin, A., Jacobo, M., & Jacobs, J, … Vranceanu, A.
(2018). Preventing chronic emotional distress in stroke survivors and their
informal caregivers. Neurocritical Care. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0641-6
McHorney, A. C., Ware, E. J., Rogers, E. W., Raczek, E. A., & Lu, J. F. (1992). The
validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long- form health status scales
and Dartmouth COOP charts: Results from the medical outcomes study. Medical
Care, 30(5), MS265.
McKevitt, C., Redfern, J., Mold, F., & Wolfe, C. (2004). Qualitative studies of stroke:
A systematic review. Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association, 35(6),
1499–1505. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000127532.64840.36
Medical Research Council. (2019). Developing and evaluating complex interventions:
Following considerable development in the field since 2006, MRC and NIHR
have jointly commissioned an update of this guidance to be published in 2019.
Retrieved March 25, 2019, from https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/complex-
interventions-guidance/
Michl, L., McLaughlin, K., Shepherd, K., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2013). Rumination
as a mechanism linking stressful life events to symptoms of depression and
anxiety: Longitudinal evidence in early adolescents and adults. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 122(2), 339–352.
Muntingh, A. D., van der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M., van Marwijk, H. W., Spinhoven, P.,
Penninx, B. W.., & van Balkom, A. J. (2011). Is the Beck Anxiety Inventory a
good tool to assess the severity of anxiety? A primary care study in the
75
Netherlands study of depression and anxiety (NESDA). BMC Family Practice,
12(1), 66. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-66
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2011). Generalised Anxiety
Disorder in adults: Management in primary, secondary and community care.
Retrieved March 25, 2019, from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK83459/
Nolan, M., Grant, G., & Keady, J. (1998). Assessing the needs of family carers: A
guide for practitioners. Brighton, England: Pavilion Publishing.
Nolan, M., Keady, J., & Grant, G. (1995). CAMI: A basis for assessment and support
with family carers. British Journal of Nursing, 4(14), 822–826.
doi:10.12968/bjon.1995.4.14.822
Oddy, M., & da Silva Ramos, S. (2013). The clinical and cost-benefits of investing
neurobehavioural rehabilitation: A multi-centre study. Brain Injury, 27(13–14),
1500–1507.
Pagnini, F., Manzoni, G. M., Castelnuovo, G., & Molinari, E. (2013). A brief
literature review about relaxation therapy and anxiety. Body, Movement and
Dance in Psychotherapy, 8(2), 71–81. doi:10.1080/17432979.2012.750248
Paiva, C. E., Barroso, E., Carneseca, E. C., Souza, C. D., Dos Santos, F., Lopez, R., &
Paiva, B. (2014). A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument
validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: A systematic review.
Bmc Medical Research Methodology, 14(1) doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-8
76
Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Garst, J., Baucom, D. H., Mcbride, C. M., Mckee, D. C, ...
Scipio, C. (2011). Caregiver-assisted coping skills training for lung cancer:
Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Pain and Symptom
Management, 41(1), 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.014
Portney L., & Watkins, P. (2007). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to
practice. London, England: Pearson.
Proske, U., & Gandevia, S. (2012). The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in
signalling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force.
Physiological Reviews, 92(4), 1651–1697. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2011
Pucciarelli, G., Ausili, D., Galbussera, A. A., Rebora, P., Savini, S., Simeone, S, ...
Vellone, E. (2018). Quality of life, anxiety, depression and burden among stroke
caregivers: A longitudinal, observational multicentre study. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 74(8), 1875–1887. doi:10.1111/jan.13695
RAND Corporation. RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Retrieved March 25, 2019,
from https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-
form.html
Rigby, H., Gubitz, G., & Phillips, S. (2009). A systematic review of caregiver burden
following stroke. London, England: doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00289.x
Robertson, R., Wenzel, L., Thompson, J., & Charles, A. (2017). Understanding NHS
financial pressures: How are they affecting patient care? Retrieved March 25,
2019, from
77
https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/
Understanding%20NHS%20financial%20pressures%20-%20full%20report.pdf
Robinson, B. C. (1983). Validation of a caregiver strain index. Journal of
Gerontology, 38(3), 344. doi:10.1093/geronj/38.3.344
Sagen, U., Vik, T. G., Moum, T., Mørland, T., Finset, A., & Dammen, T. (2009).
Screening for anxiety and depression after stroke: Comparison of the Hospital
Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Montgomery and Asberg depression rating
scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 67(4), 325–332.
doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.03.007
Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, LA:
SAGE.
Scheufele, P. (2000). Effects of progressive relaxation and classical music on
measurements of attention, relaxation, and stress responses. Journal of
Behavioural Medicine, 23(2), 207–228. doi:1005542121935
Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS Social Support Survey. Social
Science & Medicine, 32(6), 705–714. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B
Smith J., Forster A., & Young J. (2009). Cochrane review: Information provision for
stroke patients and their caregivers. Clinical Rehabilitation. 23(3), 195–206.
Smith, L. N., Norrie, J., Kerr, S. M., Lawrence, I. M., Langhorne, P., & Lees, K. R.
(2004). Impact and influences on caregiver outcomes at one year post-stroke.
Cerebrovascular Diseases, 18(2), 145–153. doi:10.1159/000079268
78
Steinhardt, M., & Dolbier, C. (2008). Evaluation of a resilience intervention to
enhance coping strategies and protective factors and decrease symptomatology.
Journal of American College Health, 56(4), 445–453.
doi:10.3200/JACH.56.44.445-454
Stroke Association. (2018). State of the nation: Stroke statistics. Retrieved March 25,
2019, from https://www.stroke.org.uk/system/files/sotn_2018.pdf
Sulter, G., Steen, C., & De Keyser, J. (1999). Use of the Barthel Index and Modified
Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation,
30(8), 1538–1541. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.8.1538
Szaflarski, J. P., Page, S. J., Kissela, B. M., Lee, J., Levine, P., & Strakowski, S. M.
(2006). Cortical reorganization following modified constraint-induced movement
therapy: A study of 4 patients with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation, 87(8), 1052–1058. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.018
Thornton, M., & Travis, S. (2003). Analysis of the reliability of the Modified
Caregiver Strain Index. Journals of Gerontology – Series B: Psychological
Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(2), S127–132, by permission of Oxford
University Press.
Titov, N., Fogliati, V., Staples, L., Gandy, M., Johnston, L., & Wootton, B., … Dear,
B. (2016). Treating anxiety and depression in older adults: randomised controlled
trial comparing guided V. self-guided internet-delivered cognitive–behavioural
therapy. Bjpsych Open, 2(1), 50–58. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002139
79
van Exel, N. J., Scholte op Reimer, W. J., Brouwer, W. B., van den Berg, B.,
Koopmanschap, M. A., & van den Bos, G. A. (2004). Instruments for assessing
the burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients in clinical practice: A
comparison of CSI, CRA, SCQ and self-rated burden. Clinical Rehabilitation,
18(2), 203–214. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr723oa
Visser-Meily, A., van Heugten, C., Post, M., Schepers, V., & Lindeman, E. (2005).
Intervention studies for caregivers of stroke survivors: A critical review. Patient
Education and Counselling, 56(3), 257–267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.013
Wan-Fei, K., Hassan, S. T. S., Sann, L. M., Ismail, S. I. F., Raman, R. A., & Ibrahim,
F. (2017). Depression, anxiety and quality of life in stroke survivors and their
family caregivers: A pilot study using an actor/partner interdependence model.
Electronic Physician, 9(8), 4924–4933. doi:10.19082/4924
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health
summary scales. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric.
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health
Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care,
30(6), 473–483.
White, C., Cantu, A., & Trevino, M. (2015). Interventions for caregivers of stroke
survivors: An update of the evidence. Clinical Nursing Studies, 3(3), 87–95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/cns.v3n3p87
80
Winkler, J., James, R., Fatovich, B., & Underwood, P. (1982). Migraine and tension
headaches: A multi-modal approach to the prevention and control of headache
pain. Perth, Western Australia: University of Western Australia - The Self-Care
Research Team.
Yeh, P., & Bull, M. (2012). Use of the resiliency model of family stress, adjustment
and adaptation in the analysis of family caregiver reaction among families of
older people with congestive heart failure. International Journal of Older People
Nursing, 7(2), 117–126. doi:10.1111/j.1748-3743.2011.00275.x
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity
of habit‐formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5),
459–482. doi:10.1002/cne.920180503
Young, J., Murray, J., & Forster, A. (2003). Review of longer-term problems after
disabling stroke. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 13(1), 55–65.
doi:10.1017/S0959259803013157
Zhou, Y., Cao, Z., Yang, M., Xi, X., Guo, Y., Fang, M, ... Du, Y. (2017). Comorbid
generalized anxiety disorder and its association with quality of life in patients
with major depressive disorder. Scientific Reports, 7 doi:10.1038/srep40511
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-
0447.1983.tb09716.x
81
List of Appendices to the Empirical Paper
Appendix A – Author guidelines for chosen journal (removed)
Appendix B – Letter to Accompany Information Sheets
Appendix C – Information Sheets
Appendix D – Consent Forms
Appendix E – G*Power Calculation
Appendix F – Detailed Information for Measures Used
Appendix G – Background Information Questionnaire for Caregivers
Appendix H – Background Information Questionnaire for Stroke Survivors
Appendix I – Relaxation Training Scripts (removed)
Appendix J – Experience of Relaxation Training Form
Appendix K – Ethical approval from the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences Ethics Committee at the University of Surrey and the Departmental Ethics Committee at the University of York
Appendix L – Written Guidance for Relaxation Training and Diary Sheet
Appendix M – Template of Themes for Deductive Thematic Analysis
Appendix N – Evidence of Assumption Checking for Repeated Measures ANOVA – Anxiety Scores
Appendix O – Evidence of Assumption Checking for Repeated Measures ANOVA – Depression Scores
Appendix P - Evidence of Assumption Checking for Repeated Measures ANOVA – Coping Scores
Appendix Q – Coded Extracts from the Deductive Thematic Analysis
Appendix R – Credibility Check of Deductive Thematic Analysis
82
Appendices to the Empirical Paper
Appendix A – Author guidelines for chosen journal (removed)
83
Appendix B – Letter to Accompany Information Sheets
Dear
My name is Jenny Csecs and I’m a Trainee Clinical Psychologist working with Hannah Thompson. (removed)
As part of my training I am carrying out a piece of research. My topic is anxiety in caregivers of stroke survivors. I am looking for a range of participants (caregivers), including those who do and do not perceive themselves as feeling anxiety. I am interested to research those who care for people many years post stroke. I am researching the benefit of self-help relaxation techniques (please see enclosed information sheets for you and the person you support to read for further information).
There is no obligation to take part. I will contact you in the New Year to see if you’re interested in being involved in the project.
If you would like to register your interest or get further information about the study please contact us (details above). Feel free to forward these details to anyone who you think might be interested in our research.
Yours sincerely,
Jenny Csecs and Hannah Thompson
84
Appendix C – Information Sheets
Caregiver Information Sheet
Self-help Relaxation for Anxiety in Caregivers of Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors
IntroductionI am a Trainee Clinical Psychologist at the University of Surrey. As part of my training I am carrying out a piece of research into anxiety and stroke caregivers. You have been contacted because you are a caregiver of someone who has had a stroke.
You and the person you are caring for are being invited to take part in a doctorate research project. Before you decide if you want to participate, it is important for you to understand why the research is being done and what it will involve.
Please read this information carefully and discuss it with friends and relatives. Please ask if there is anything that is not clear or if you would like more information.
Take time to decide whether you want to take part.
What is the study about?I am researching the effect of self-help techniques on anxiety in stroke caregivers and I would be grateful if you would help me with this by taking part in my study.
I am looking for a range of participants, including those who do and do not perceive themselves as feeling anxiety. I am interested in caregivers of stroke survivors in the chronic phase as there is less emphasis on treatments for individuals living in the community.
Feeling anxious or worried is common in stroke caregivers. People frequently report concerns about the stroke survivor they’re caring for having another stroke, a lack of
85
support available and feeling uncertain about the impact of stroke and their ability to cope and support the stroke survivor. Some feelings of anxiety and worry are normal and healthy, however for some people these worries, and the physical sensations associated with them, impact on their day-to-day life and can feel overwhelming.
At the moment little is known about what affects anxiety in stroke caregivers. Understandably some caregivers feel overwhelmed and may find it difficult to access psychotherapy or support which involves going out of the house. Researchers are therefore looking at ways of helping people to cope with their worries and feelings of anxiety by themselves, using various self-help strategies.
I am conducting a study to test whether self-help techniques done at home using a CD reduces feelings of worry and anxiety in caregivers of stroke survivors. I am interested in people who care for stroke survivors at home in an unpaid capacity (caregivers can live in or independently, and may be related or not to the stroke survivor), of any age and gender, and who would be able to answer questions about themselves once a month on three occasions (please see Figure 1 under ‘What will I have to do?’ section) and follow self-help techniques from a CD for a month.
Do I have to take part?Taking part is voluntary. It is up to you whether you take part. If you decide to take part, you will be asked to sign a consent form. If you change your mind, you are free to withdraw at any time and do not have to give a reason. There will be no adverse consequences. You can contact me for further information and I am happy to answer any queries. My contact details are at the end of this information sheet.
Even if you agree to take part, you can choose not to answer any of the questions or you can withdraw from the study at any time without giving a reason. Whether or not you decide to take part in this research, your decision will have no effect on any other care or treatment you or the person you are caring for are receiving.
What will I have to do?You will be asked to go through several questionnaires, taking approximately 1 hour (see Figure 1 below). You have a choice as to whether this is initially in person with the researcher at your home, over the telephone, via paper forms to be sent back to the researcher or via an online link. Questions will be about yourself, your feelings of worry, your current health, your coping and your perceived level of social support.
One month later I will ring you to go through questionnaires, taking no longer than 20 minutes. You will then be sent the CD containing a self-help exercise, which is about 20 minutes long. Using this CD in this manner has been shown to be effective at reducing anxiety and worry. I will ask you to practice this exercise five times a week for one month.
86
At the end of the study I will ring you to go through the questionnaires, and to ask you about your experience of doing the self-help exercise. This should take about 20 minutes.
Figure 1. Timeline of what you’d need to do in the study
How do I agree to take part?You will be asked to sign a Consent Form, to say that you have understood what the research is all about and that you have had the chance to ask me any questions first. The Consent Form also says that all information about you is kept confidential in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.
Does what I say get shared with anyone else?The information you give me will remain confidential and will only be seen by myself and my supervisors. You will be kept anonymous in the study.
No other clinical professionals involved in your care, or the care of the person with a stroke you are caring for, will have access to the information you give me during the research. You may also wish to discuss this study will your GP before agreeing to participate.
All information gathered during this research study will be stored securely in a locked filing cabinet at the University of Surrey, in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.
Should you disclose that you or someone else is at risk then the researcher may need to report this to an appropriate authority. This would usually be discussed with you first.
1 month later:
Telephone call to answer
questionnaires and give
feedback about the relaxation
exercises
(~20 mins)
Receive relaxation
CD: Complete exercises
5x per week for 1 month
1 month later:
Telephone call to answer
questionnaires
(~20 mins)
Background information
gathering and questionnaires
via a home visit,
telephone call, post or online
(~1 hour)
Signed consent
form received
87
What happens when the research study stops?Research takes time to complete. If data from the research is written up and published in academic and professional journals or discussed at conferences and in lectures, your part in the study will be kept confidential. I can send you a copy of the final research study or a summary if you would like.
What are the benefits of taking part?The research provides an opportunity for you to try out a self-help exercise and is an investigation as to whether it has any effect on your worries and feelings of anxiety. However, this is research – we are exploring potential ways to reduce anxiety. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that there will be any personal benefit to you taking part.
Changes to health services can be based on the findings of research studies. It is only by researching real people and real issues, that we can discover what’s working and what needs improving. While you may not see any immediate change or benefit to yourself or the person with a stroke who you care for, you will be contributing to a potentially useful piece of research that may improve the health treatment and service for others in the future.
Are there any downsides to taking part?You may find doing the CD difficult or time-consuming, not helpful. We can also take a break at any time during the questions or decide not to carry on with them. You may also find some of the questions difficult. If you find questions too personal or upsetting in any way, you don’t have to answer it. If you have any concerns you can contact me or my supervisor, and you may decide not to carry on with the study. For external support, you can contact the Stroke Association or you may wish to talk to your GP.
What is there is a problem?If you have any concerns about the study or any aspect of the way you have been treated during the course of the research study, then you can contact me or one of my supervisors or the Head of the School of Psychology at the University of Surrey. My supervisors’ names are Dr Hannah Thompson and Dr Laura Simonds. Their contact details are at the end.
Who has reviewed the project?The study has been reviewed and received a Favourable Ethical Opinion (FEO) from the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences Ethics Committee at the University of Surrey and the Department of Psychology Ethics Committee at the University of York.
I hope I have answered all of your questions about the research study, but please feel free to ask me anything else that I have not covered. My contact details and those of my supervisors are below.
88
Thank you for taking the time to consider participating in this study and reading this Information Sheet.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Research being conducted by:Jenny Csecs, Trainee Clinical Psychologist, Principal Investigator(contact details removed)
Supervised by:Dr Hannah Thompson, Lecturer(contact details removed)
Dr Laura Simonds, Lecturer in Clinical Psychology(contact details removed)
89
Patient Information Sheet
Self-help Relaxation for Anxiety in Caregivers of Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors
IntroductionI am a Trainee Clinical Psychologist at the University of Surrey. As part of my training I am carrying out a piece of research into anxiety and stroke caregivers. You have been contacted because you are someone who has had a stroke and has a caregiver.
You and the person you are caring for are being invited to take part in a doctorate research project. Before you decide if you want to participate, it is important for you to understand why the research is being done and what it will involve.
Please read this information carefully and discuss it with friends and relatives. Please ask if there is anything that is not clear or if you would like more information.
Take time to decide whether you want to take part.
What is the study about?I am researching the effect of self-help techniques on anxiety in stroke caregivers and I would be grateful if you would help me with this by taking part in my study.
The study should help us gain a better understanding of what impacts on caregivers’ anxiety. It should also help us to better support caregivers with anxiety and possible interventions in the future.
Why have I been invited to take part in the study?You had a stroke and have a caregiver who helps to support you. They may or may not live with you at home.
90
Do I have to take part?Taking part is voluntary. It is up to you whether you take part. If you decide to take part, you will be asked to sign a consent form. If you change your mind, you are free to withdraw at any time and do not have to give a reason. There will be no adverse consequences in terms of care or treatment.
What will I have to do? You will be asked a few questions which involve general information about you and your stroke. Your caregiver will be asked similar questions and more questions about themselves which include questions about their mood and how they are coping. They will also participate in relaxation exercises but you will not need to do this.
The research will take place in person with the researcher at your home, over the telephone, via paper forms to be sent back to the researcher or via an online link when it is convenient for you. If you find questions too personal or upsetting in any way, you don’t have to answer it. You would need to answer questions for approximately 5 minutes.
You can stop the research at any time.
If you would like to take part please inform the researcher, you will be required to sign a consent form before beginning the study.
What are the possible disadvantages or risks of taking part? There are no risks attached to this study.
What are the possible benefits of taking part? This is research not therapy, and as such there may be no personal benefit to you taking part. However, it will improve scientific knowledge about anxiety in caregivers of people with a stroke.
What happens when the research study stops? If data from the research are written up and published in academic and professional journals or discussed at conferences and in lectures, your part in the study will be kept confidential.
91
What is there is a problem?If you have any concerns about the study or any aspect of the way you have been treated during the course of the research study, then you can contact me or one of my supervisors or the Head of the School of Psychology at the University of Surrey. My supervisors’ names are Dr Hannah Thompson and Dr Laura Simonds. Their contact details are at the end.
Who has reviewed the project?The study has been reviewed and received a Favourable Ethical Opinion (FEO) from the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences Ethics Committee at the University of Surrey and the Department of Psychology Ethics Committee at the University of York.
Will my taking part in the study be kept confidential? Yes. All of the information you give will be anonymised so that those reading reports from the research will not know who has contributed to it.
Data will be stored securely in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998.
Should you disclose that you or someone else is at risk then the researcher may need to report this to an appropriate authority. This would usually be discussed with you first.
Thank you for taking the time to read this Information Sheet.
Research being conducted by:
Jenny Csecs, Trainee Clinical Psychologist, Principal Investigator
(contact details removed)
Supervised by:
Dr Hannah Thompson, Lecturer
(contact details removed)
Dr Laura Simonds, Lecturer in Clinical Psychology
(contact details removed)
92
Appendix D – Consent Forms
93
94
Appendix E – G*Power Calculation
95
Appendix F – Detailed Information for Measures Used
InstrumentReference Completion time
Construct measured; items and scale Scoring and interpretation Rationale and psychometrics
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)5 minutes
Two 7-item subscales measure anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D).
Participants are asked to rate each item in relation to frequency experienced in the past week on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from zero to three e.g. ‘I get sudden feelings of panic’ from ‘0 – not at
all’ to ‘3 – very often indeed’.
Total score for each subscale is 21. Higher scores are
indicative of greater levels of anxiety and depression.
The cut-off recommended for possible clinical anxiety and
depression for each subscale is 8 (see Bjelland et al., 2002
for a large review of the HADS, N = 71 included
studies)
The HADS was initially designed for use in a hospital outpatient clinic, but is now
commonly used for measuring anxiety and depression in caregivers of stroke survivors
(Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010; Pucciarelli et al., 2018; Sagen et al., 2009).
Good concurrent validity with other measures of anxiety and depression, and
good sensitivity and specificity in relation to clinical caseness (Bjelland et al., 2002).
Good internal consistency of both subscales demonstrated (HADS-A Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83, HADS-D Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82).
Adequate retest reliability has been shown for both subscales (0.73–0.76) over a 2–6-week period (Herrmann, 1997; Paiva et al.,
2014).
96
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI, Beck & Steer, 19935 minutes
Self-report measure of anxiety with 21-items, comprising of descriptive statements of anxiety
symptoms.
Participants are asked to rate each item in relation to how much they have been bothered it over the past week (e.g. shaky) on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from, ‘0 – not at all’ to ‘3 – severely - I
could barely stand it’.
Higher scores suggest greater the anxiety symptomology,
with a total possible score of 63.
In terms of clinical ranges for anxiety, scores of 0–7 are
termed as ‘Minimal’, scores of 8–15 are ‘Mild’, ‘Moderate’
concerns scores of 16–25, and scores of 26-63 are defined as
‘Severe’. The cut-off for clinical anxiety is 16.
The BAI was used in addition to the HADS-A to increase construct validity, because the HADS neglects to assess
somatic complaints of anxiety (Hansson et al., 2009; Muntingh et al., 2011).
The BAI has been shown to be significantly correlated with other widely used measures
of anxiety (e.g., State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, r = 0.47–0.58, Beck & Steer, 1993) thus illustrating good concurrent
validity (Portney & Watkins, 2007).
High internal consistency reported for the BAI (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92, Beck et al., 1988), and reasonable test re-test reliability of 0.62 and 0.93 at 7-and 1-week intervals.
The Carers’ Assessment of Managing Index (CAMI, Nolan et al., 1995)10 minutes (Harvey et al., 2005)
The CAMI has three subscales (Lundh, 1999): Managing Events/Problem Solving (15 items), Managing Meanings/Perceptions (14 items) and Managing Stress (9 items).
Designed for use with family caregivers as a measure of coping (Harvey et al., 2005). It can be
completed as a self-report measure or via a researcher.
Caregivers read a series of 38 statements about strategies that other caregivers have reported they
use to help them cope, and then caregivers are asked to rate whether they use each strategy and, if so, how helpful they find it. Strategies (e.g. having
a good cry) are rated on a 4-point Likert scale from ‘1 – I do not use this’, ‘2 – Not really
helpful’, ‘3 – Quite helpful’ to ‘4 – Very helpful’ (Yeh & Bull, 2012).
Scores range from 38–152, with higher scores suggestive
of more effective coping.
Good content and construct validity has been argued as the measure was based on
the transactional model of stress and coping (Harvey et al., 2005; Nolan et al., 1998),
the scale is well grounded theoretically, and items were developed through interviews with > 100 caregivers and a review of the literature (Nolan et al., 1995). Although formal evidence of construct validity has
not been shown (Harvey et al., 2005).
Good internal consistency for the CAMI was reported as 0.86 (Nolan et al., 1995) and more recently as 0.91 (Jarvis et al., 2006), and, acceptable for the subscales
0.64–0.69 for the subscales (Llewellyn et al., 2003).
97
The Caregiver Strain Index (CSI, Robinson, 1983)5 minutes
Self-report measure with 13 items related to the demands of caregiving, such as ‘It is a financial strain’ which caregivers subsequently rate ‘Yes -
1’ or ‘No - 0’.
Scores range from 0–13; the higher the scores, the more
considerable the burden experienced.
It can be used as a screening tool for considerable burden, which is indicated by scores above 6 (Rigby et al., 2009;
Robinson, 1983).
Good internal consistency has been presented (Cronbach’s alpha = .86,
Robinson, 1983).
Construct validity of the CSI was also established in relation to items pertaining to
the subjective perceptions of the care-taking relationship by caregivers, all showing significant relationships (r = .28–.67; p ≤ .01); and measures
concerning the emotional health of caregivers with significant correlations demonstrated with the Profile of Mood
States (r = .20–.37, p ≤. 05).
RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND SF-36, RAND Corporation, 2018)10 minutes
Self-report measure of quality of life with eight subscales (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992): Physical
Functioning, Bodily Pain, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Role Limitations due to Personal or Emotional Problems, Emotional Well-
being, Social Functioning, Energy/Fatigue and General Health Perceptions. There is also a single
item that measures an indication of perceived change in health.
Each item comprises of rating options on a Likert scale, such as rating ‘in general would you say your health is: 1 – excellent, 2 – very good, 3 –
good, 4 – fair or 5 – poor’.
Scores are coded on a 0 to 100 range and items in the same
scale averaged together (RAND Corporation, 2018).
Higher scores are indicative of a more positive health state.
Items can then be scored and amalgamated to create the
Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component
Summary (MCS; see Ware, Kosinski, & Keller, 1994 for
scoring instructions followed).
Good discriminant and construct validity was shown through the PCS and MCS scales in the RAND SF-36 relating to
scores on measures of medical and psychiatric conditions (McHorney et al.,
1992).
Good to excellent internal consistency has been demonstrated for all of the subscales (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78–0.93, Ware &
Sherbourne, 1992).
98
Medical Outcomes Support Survey (MOS-SSS, Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991)5 minutes
The original MOS-SSS has 19 self-report items, which measure four dimensions of social support:
Emotional/Informational Support, Tangible Support, Affectionate Support and Positive Social
Interaction.
This measure was adapted for use in the current study, by omitting the Tangible Support subscale
and additional item due to these being more relevant for patients with chronic conditions (who the measure was initially designed for) rather than
caregivers. Therefore, 14-items of the measure were used.
The adaption and omission was also made to reduce testing fatigue at Pre-1. Responses
regarding social support were rated on a scale ranging from ‘1 – None of the time’ to ‘5 – All of the time’, an example item is: ‘someone to have a
good time with’.
Summed scores range from 14-70. Higher scores represent
greater perceived social support.
Previous research has calculated a total score,
summing all of the subscales together, and explored this in relation to stroke caregiver
anxiety (Cumming, Cadilac, Rubin, & Pearce, 2008; Lui et
al. 2012), which was completed in this study but
omitted five items as discussed.
Excellent internal consistency has been evidenced (Cronbach’s alphas for the
subscales > 0.90, Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991).
Results also showed that the MOS-SSS has high convergent and discriminant validity with relevant measures of quality of life,
including physical functioning and mental health.
Modified Rankin Used to obtain an estimate of the stroke survivor’s physical functioning, (i.e. the Excellent test re-test reliability has been
99
Scale (mRS, Sulter et al., 1999)1 minute
level of physical disability and dependency in activities of daily living after the stroke, Choi-Kwon et al., 2005; Wan-Fei et al., 2017). Caregivers rated this on a
one-item six-point Likert scale, ranging from ‘0 – No support at all’ to ‘5 – Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention’.
presented (k = 0.81–0.95, Banks & Marotta, 2007), and moderate inter-rater
reliability (k = 0.56–0.78).
Construct validity has been affirmed through mRS scores being related to the degree of stroke injury, where the lesion was in the brain, the type of stroke, and
short and longer-term disability post-stroke (Banks & Marotta, 2007). Convergent validity has also been shown through comparisons with other scales used to
assess stroke survivors, such as the Barthel Index, the Short Form-36 and the Stroke
Impact Scale; for instance, a strong correlation with the Barthel Index has been
evidenced (r = 0.89, p < 0.001, Lai & Duncan, 1999).
Due to feasibility reasons, the mRS was completed by the caregiver rather than a
clinician, as usually completed in previous research, because the caregivers knew the
stroke survivors the best.
mRS adapted1 minute
The original mRS was adapted to provide an estimate of stroke survivors’ mental functioning, in terms of cognitive ability.
Caregivers were asked to rate stroke survivors in relation to the support they required with tasks requiring cognitive functioning irrespective of physical ability,
such as everyday tasks (e.g., responding to instructions accurately, paying for goods). Ratings were on a 6-point Likert scale, adapted from the mRS physical
functioning categories, ranging from ‘0 – No support at all’, ‘3 – Moderate disability; requiring some help’ to ‘5 – Severe disability; requiring constant care and
attention’.
Not established: the adaptation was made to provide an estimate of cognitive
functioning ability, which was feasible for the caregiver to rate and would not
contribute significantly towards testing fatigue.
100
Appendix G – Background Information Questionnaire for Caregivers
Caregiver Information
Date today:________________
Caregiver Name:____________________
Date of birth:________________
Gender:________________
How do you describe your ethnic origin? White – British White – Irish Other white background – please state: ________________________________ Asian or Asian British – Bangladesh Asian or Asian British – Indian Asian or Asian British – Pakistani Chinese Other Asian background – please state: ________________________________ Mixed – White and Asian Mixed – White and Black African Mixed – White and Black British Other ethnic background – please state: ________________________________ Prefer not to say
What is your marital status? Married Single, never married Partner Separated Divorced Widowed Other – please state: _______________________________________________ Prefer not to say
What is your relationship to the person who had a stroke that you support?
101
_____________________________________________________________
What are your living circumstances? Live alone Live with partner/spouse Live with family members, please state________________________________ Other – please state: _______________________________________________ Prefer not to say
Employment status: Are you currently…? Employed Self-employed Out of work and looking for work Out of work and not looking for work Homemaker Student Retired Retired to become full-time carer Unable to work Other – please state: ______________________________________________ Prefer not to say
Please state your current occupation, or previous occupation if you’re not currently working:
_____________________________________________________________
What is the highest degree or level of school you have completed? If currently enrolled, please state the highest degree received. No schooling completed Primary education Secondary education (GCSEs/O-levels) Sixth form or college Bachelor’s degree Master’s degree Doctorate degree Other – please state: ______________________________________________
How long have you been supporting the person you care for? How many months/years?
102
_____________________________________________________________
On average, how many hours do you spend supporting the person you care for per day (up to 24 hours)?
_____________________________________________________________
Have you been diagnosed with any mental or physical health difficulties? What are they?
Yes No Prefer not to say
If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Are you currently accessing any professional support? Please state:
Yes No Prefer not to say
If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Have you ever had any psychological therapy, this includes any you might be having at the moment? Yes No Prefer not to say
103
If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Are you on any medication at the moment? Yes No Prefer not to say
If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________What do you currently do to manage any anxiety you may experience? Please describe:
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
Please rate which option is the best fit for the ability of the stroke survivor that you support in relation to physical functioning:
0 No support at all 1 No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2 Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3 Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4 Moderately severe disability; unable to walk and attend to bodily needs without assistance 5 Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention Prefer not to say
Please rate which option is the best fit for the ability of the stroke survivor that you support in relation to cognitive functioning. Cognitive functioning relates to their cognitive ability to complete everyday tasks unaided, irrespective of physical ability to complete such tasks.
104
Examples include responding to instructions accurately, using a bus or paying for goods, brushing teeth or getting dressed.
0 No support at all 1 No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2 Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities 3 Moderate disability; requiring some help 4 Moderately severe disability; unable to do most tasks without assistance 5 Severe disability; requiring constant care and attention Prefer not to say
Appendix H – Background Information Questionnaire for Stroke Survivors
Stroke Survivor Information
Date today: __________________________________
105
Stroke survivor name:_________________________________
Date of birth:_________________________________________
Gender:____________________________________
How do you describe your ethnic origin? White – British White – Irish Other white background – please state: ________________________________ Asian or Asian British – Bangladesh Asian or Asian British – Indian Asian or Asian British – Pakistani Chinese Other Asian background – please state: ________________________________ Mixed – White and Asian Mixed – White and Black African Mixed – White and Black British Other ethnic background – please state: ________________________________ Prefer not to say
What is the highest degree or level of school you have completed? If currently enrolled, please state the highest degree received: No schooling completed Primary education Secondary education (GCSEs/O-levels) Sixth form or college Bachelor’s degree Master’s degree Doctorate degree Other – please state: ______________________________________________
If known, what type of stroke did you have:
_____________________________________________________________
If known, what date did you have a stroke:
106
____________________________________________________________
Appendix I – Relaxation Training Scripts (removed)
107
Appendix J – Experience of Relaxation Training Form
How regularly did you complete the relaxation training?
If less than required, why?
108
What time of day did you typically take part?
Where did you typically complete training?
What was good about the training?
What didn’t you like about the training?
Would you use this relaxation training in the future? If yes, why? If not, why?
Any additional comments about the training?
What was your experience of taking part in the study?
Appendix K – Ethical approval from the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences Ethics Committee at the University of Surrey and the Departmental Ethics
Committee at the University of York
109
110
111
Appendix L – Written Guidance for Relaxation Training and Diary Sheet
Dear
Self-help Relaxation for Anxiety in Caregivers of Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors
Please find enclosed the self-help relaxation audio; it is recommended that you listen to this audio five times per week for four weeks. Please keep a record of how often you listen to the audio (see diary attached).
The track-list of the audio is:
Track 1: Introduction to Progressive Muscle RelaxationTrack 2: Progressive Muscle RelaxationTrack 3: Autogenic Relaxation
Track 1 is an introduction to the main exercises. Please listen to this on as many days as you need to before completing the main exercises (Track 2 and Track 3). Once you feel like you no longer require this introductory track, please feel free to skip to Track 2. Please listen to the tracks in one go per day.
I will telephone you again in approximately 4 weeks’ time to complete some questionnaires about your mood, anxiety and coping, and also to ask you a few questions about your experience of taking part in this study.
Thank you very much for participating. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely,
Jenny Csecs Dr Hannah ThompsonTrainee Clinical Psychologist Lecturer(contact details removed)
112
Diary
Please tick the days when you have listened to the relaxation audio
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5*
* Please tick the days in Week 5 if you did not begin listening to the relaxation audio at the beginning of Week 1, e.g. if you started listening to the relaxation audio on a Wednesday or later in Week 1 please continue listening to it until this day of Week 5
113
Appendix M – Template of Themes for Deductive Thematic Analysis
Themes Definitions/descriptorsCore process themes
Progressive muscle relaxationRelaxes a group [of muscles] ‘The individual is to learn how to relax the principal muscle groups of his body to any extreme degree.
Obviously this implies the reduction of impulses portions of the nervous system, since it is generally agreed among physiologists that there are no specific inhibitory fibres to the striated muscles.’ (Jacobson, 1987, p.526)‘The relaxation is progressive.’ ‘(i) The S relaxes a group, for instance, the flexors of the right forearm, further
and further each minute’ (Jacobson, 1987, p. 526)
Acquainted in a certain order with the principal muscle-groups of their entire body
‘He becomes acquainted in a certain order with the principal muscle-groups of his entire body. With each new group he simultaneously relaxes such parts as have previously received practice.’ (Jacobson, 1987, p.526)
Practises from day to day. Tends towards a state in which quiet is automatically maintained
‘Doing away with residual tension is the essential point of the present method. This may not happen in a moment, even in the practised person.’ (Jacobson, 1987, p. 526)
Autogenic relaxationReduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive afferent stimulation (it should take place in a quiet room)
‘A reduction of afferent stimuli requires observation of the following points: the exercise should takeplace in a quiet room with moderate temperature and reduced illumination; restricting clothes should be
loosened or removed; and the body should be relaxed, with the eyes closed, before the mental exercises are begun.’ (Kanji, 1997, p.163)
Mental repetition of psychophysiologically adapted verbal formulae
‘The trainee's attitude, while repeating a formula in his or her mind, is deemed as 'passive concentration'.Apprehension must be avoided, as must any goal directed effort. The effectiveness of passive concentrationon a given formula is seen to depend on two other factors: the first, mental contact with the part of the body
indicated by the formula, for example, the right arm; the second, representation of the autogenic formula in the mind. At the outset, passive concentration on a formula should not last more than 30–60 seconds, and should
lead only to superficial relaxation. The time span is gradually increased, with an increasing depth of relaxation, to 10–15 minutes.’ (Kanji, 1997, p.163)
114
Mental activity conceived as 'passive concentration'
As the above box involving, ‘Mental repetition of psychophysiologically adapted verbal formulae ‘, therefore these two themes were merged.
Effects of relaxation trainingProgressive muscle relaxation
Release the tension (in muscles) Relaxes a group of muscles which are acquainted in a certain order (Jacobson, 1987).
Absence of thinking When the residual tension of the muscles is relaxed, the intense focus on the muscles eliminates the occurrence of thinking (Jacobson, 1987).
Control of images/attention When muscles are completely relaxed, people will not experience mental images at the same time (Jacobson, 1987).
‘With progressive muscular relaxation, not alone imagery, but also attention, recollection, thought-processes, and emotion gradually diminish’ (p.535).
Autogenic relaxationCounteracting of acute stress or fatigue
‘Mental and physical refreshment being provided’ (Kanji, 1997, p. 164).
Provision of mental and physical refreshment
As the above box involving ‘counteracting of acute stress or fatigue’, so these themes were merged.
Achieve peace of mind The extent to which one experiences inner peace and harmony’ (Lee et al., 2013).
Cope with life’s pressures Improving participants’ ability to cope with life stressors, with coping defined as continuously changing cognitive and behavioural efforts to manage particular demands that are appraised as exceeding a person’s
resources and/or possibly taxing (Lazarus & Folkman 1984; Matthieu & Ivanoff, 2006).
Find emotional balance ‘Once it is possible to reduce excessive tension, a sense of wholeness and well-being is brought about by better communication between the two hemispheres of the brain, which takes place during practice of the exercises. The sense of balance is often reflected in improved physical co-ordination and stamina as reported by athletes,
also greater emotional stability and ability to concentrate on intellectual issues.’ (Carruthers, 1979, p.437).Deleted theme as quotes overlapped with other themes.
Enhance health and general well-being
This theme describes enhancing health and general well-being in terms of ‘well-being encompassing the physical, psychological and social demands’ of caregivers (Draper & Brocklehurst, 2007, p.
265; Anderson 1992), such as their physical health and symptoms of this (e.g., headaches, weight loss),
115
psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression) and stopping work to care for their family member.Deleted theme due to merging it with ‘cope with life’s pressures’ as quotes overlapped between the two
themes.
Improve coping abilities Merged with ‘cope with life’s pressures’, see definition above.
Control the body’s stress responses
Reducing ‘the stress responses brought about by the sympathetic system and increasing the actions of the parasympathetic system’ (Carruthers, 1979, p. 437).
Merged with ‘counteracting of acute stress or fatigue’ theme due overlapping quotes.
116
Appendix N – Evidence of Assumption Checking for Repeated Measures ANOVA – Anxiety Scores
HADS-A
Tests of NormalityKolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.HADS-A Pre-1 .121 15 .200* .956 15 .621HADS-A Pre-2 .185 15 .180 .898 15 .087HADS-A Post .109 15 .200* .967 15 .808
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
The HADS-A scores did not deviate significantly from normal (p > .05).
HADS-A Pre-1.
HADS-A Pre-1 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
117
HADS-A Pre-1 scores seemed to generally follow a linear pattern with points clustered around the fit
line.
No outliers were identified.
118
HADS-A Pre-2.
HADS-A Pre-2 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
HADS-A Pre-2 scores seemed to generally follow a linear pattern with points clustered around the fit line.
119
No outliers were identified.
HADS-A Post.
HADS-A Post scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
120
HADS-A Post scores seemed to generally follow a linear pattern with points clustered around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
121
BAI
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
BAI Pre-1 .202 15 .099 .899 15 .092
BAI Pre-2 .143 15 .200* .913 15 .149
BAI Post .273 15 .004 .832 15 .010
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
As the BAI Post scores were both significantly non-normal (p < .05), the plots below suggest that scores generally did not cluster around the fit lines and the histograms show the scores generally did not follow the normal distribution, this means that the assumptions of parametric tests were not met. Hence, Friedman’s ANOVA was used to assess whether there were differences between BAI scores over time.
BAI Pre-1.
BAI Pre-1 scores were not observed to follow a normal distribution.
122
BAI Pre-1 scores were observed to generally not cluster around the fit line or follow a linear pattern.
No outliers were identified.
123
BAI Pre-2.
BAI Pre-2 scores were not observed to follow a normal distribution.
BAI Pre-2 scores did not appear to follow a linear pattern and they were not generally clustered around the fit line.
124
No outliers were identified.
BAI Post.
BAI Post scores were not observed to follow a normal distribution curve; there was evidence of positive skew due to a higher frequency of scores being clustered on the left-hand side of the histogram.
125
BAI Post scores were observed to generally not cluster around the fit line, or follow a linear pattern.
No outliers were identified.
126
Appendix O - Evidence of Assumption Checking for Repeated Measures ANOVA – Depression Scores
HADS-D
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
HADS-D Pre-1 .141 15 .200* .960 15 .685
HADS-D Pre-2 .153 15 .200* .935 15 .325
HADS-D Post .160 15 .200* .943 15 .422
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
The HADS-D scores did not deviate significantly from normal (p > .05).
HADS-D Pre-1.
HADS-D Pre-1 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
127
HADS-D Pre-1 scores seemed to generally follow a linear pattern with points clustered around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
128
HADS-D Pre-2.
HADS-D Pre-2 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
HADS-D Pre-2 scores seemed to generally follow a linear pattern with points clustered around the fit line.
129
No outliers were identified.
HADS-D Post.
HADS-D Post scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
130
HADS-D Post scores seemed to generally follow a linear pattern with points clustered around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
131
Appendix P - Evidence of Assumption Checking for Repeated Measures ANOVA – Coping Scores
CAMI Total
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
CAMI Total Score Pre-1 .122 14 .200* .972 14 .902
CAMI Total Score Pre-2 .121 14 .200* .961 14 .747
CAMI Total Score Post .154 14 .200* .945 14 .487
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
CAMI Total scores did not deviate significantly from normal (p > .05).
CAMI Total Score Pre-1.
CAMI Total Pre-1 scores seemed to generally follow a normal distribution.
132
CAMI Total Pre-1 scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
133
CAMI Total Score Pre-2.
CAMI Total Pre-2 scores seemed to generally follow a normal distribution.
CAMI Total Pre-2 scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
134
No outliers were identified.
CAMI Total Score Post.
CAMI Total Post scores seemed to generally follow a normal distribution.
135
CAMI Total Post scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
136
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
CAMI Managing Events / Problem-solving Pre-1
.108 14 .200* .970 14 .871
CAMI Managing Events / Problem-solving Pre-2
.178 14 .200* .899 14 .109
CAMI Managing Events / Problem-solving Post
.169 14 .200* .903 14 .126
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving scores did not deviate significantly from normal (p > .05).
CAMI Managing Events / Problem-solving Pre-1.
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving Pre-1 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
137
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving Pre-1 scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
138
CAMI Managing Events / Problem-solving Pre-2.
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving Pre-2 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving Pre-2 scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
139
No outliers were identified.
CAMI Managing Events / Problem-solving Post.
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving Post scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
140
CAMI Managing Events/Problem-solving Post scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
141
CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
CAMI Managing Meanings / Perceptions Pre-1
.249 14 .019 .847 14 .020
CAMI Managing Meanings / Perceptions Pre-2
.200 14 .133 .853 14 .024
CAMI Managing Meanings / Perceptions Post
.193 14 .166 .953 14 .614
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Some CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions scored deviated significantly from normal (p < .05 for Pre-1 scores and when tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test at Pre-2). However, as Pre-1 and Post scores generally seemed to follow a normal distribution; all Pre-1, Pre-2 and Post scores were generally clustered around the fit line; and no outliers were identified; data were assumed to be normally distributed.
CAMI Managing Meanings / Perceptions Pre-1.
CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions Pre-1 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
142
CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions Pre-1 scores seemed to generally cluster around the fit line, although there could be evidence of some non-linearity in the data, more data points are required to ascertain this.
No outliers were identified.
143
CAMI Managing Meanings / Perceptions Pre-2.
CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions Pre-2 scores appeared to not follow a normal distribution.
CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions Pre-2 scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line, although there could be evidence of some non-linearity in the data more data points are required to ascertain this.
144
No outliers were identified.
CAMI Managing Meanings / Perceptions Post.
CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions Post scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
145
CAMI Managing Meanings/Perceptions Post scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
146
CAMI Managing Stress
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-1
.126 14 .200* .941 14 .430
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-2
.137 14 .200* .966 14 .812
CAMI Managing Stress Post
.099 14 .200* .986 14 .996
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
CAMI Managing Stress scores did not deviate significantly from normal (p > .05).
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-1.
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-1 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
147
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-1 scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
148
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-2.
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-2 scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
CAMI Managing Stress Pre-2 scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
149
No outliers were identified.
CAMI Managing Stress Post.
CAMI Managing Stress Post scores appeared to generally follow a normal distribution.
150
CAMI Managing Stress Post scores seemed to follow a linear pattern with points generally clustering around the fit line.
No outliers were identified.
151
Appendix Q – Coded Extracts from the Deductive Thematic Analysis
Themes Data (data of example codes relevant to the themes underlined) Example codes (those specifically relevant to the theme underlined)
Core process themes Progressive muscle relaxation
Relaxes a group of muscles which are acquainted in a certain order
Int: What was good about the training? P2: Breathing, after the 1st week the penny dropped. Muscle exercises.
P7: Liked the calmness, the space put it, felt relaxed, being talked through exercises and talking through tensing muscles - hadn't thought about this
before.P10: clenching muscles = really good
Int: Would you use this relaxation training in the future? If yes, why? If not, why? P7: Yes, intend to. Found it useful, relaxing, took some physical tension away. Helped induce sleep and woke up fresher the next morning,
or had a deeper sleep on occasion.P14: Yes, calmed me down a bit. In spite of everything else going on
around me. Takes time out for self a little. Body relaxes and found I relax with it.
enjoyed breathing exercise, changed after practice, liked muscle exercises
calm, felt more relaxed, create space, liked following a process, muscle exercises, new experience, good
rhythm, good voiceenjoyed PMR
wants to continue, beneficial effect, felt relaxed, felt less tense, helped sleep, felt refreshed, helped sleep
wants to continue, felt calmer, busy life, time out for self, body relaxed, felt relaxed
Practises from day to day tending towards a state in which quiet is automatically maintained
Int: Would you use this relaxation training in the future? If yes, why? If not, why? P16: yes, definitely, and at work too because of the benefit.
Helps if it's all feeling a bit much, calming, help you to feel better.Int: Any additional comments about the training? P8: Not been as calm
when not used it (snapped more). Don't challenge things as much, found it helpful.
Int: What was good about the training? P13: Tried to focus on what I was doing with it. Found it difficult at times with the mind wandering - more practice made it easier. Was helpful. 'felt it's worked' at the end and felt
better for doing it.Int: Any additional comments about the training? P15: Was a slow start getting used to it and the voice and the gaps in between. After a week, it
went swimmingly. I'd never done it before. You know what's coming. Gradually you get to a point where you are calm after it.
wants to continue, apply in different settings, helps if overwhelmed, feel calmer, beneficial effect
helps calmness, manage emotions less, take a step back, beneficial effect
attempted to focus attention, difficult to focus attention, improved over time, beneficial effect,
positive experience
took time to adjust to process, better over time, new experience, certainty expected, wants to do it with someone, difficulty imagining, feel calmer, better
over time
Autogenic
152
relaxationReduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive afferent stimulation (it should take place in a quiet room)
Int: What time of day did you typically take part? P15: First thing in the morning, before breakfast was best for me. Couldn't do it during the day =
too noisy/distracting.P9: Mainly evening ~7pm (before settling down to the telly). Chose to
complete it at this time because no demands (little demands).P8: Sat in armchair in the lounge, easier to do it sitting up than lying
down. Less distractionInt: Where did you typically complete the training? P13: Same place in the
kitchen - tried to find a quiet place without external noises
common specific time, tried other times, attention detracted, noise
common specific time, time needed to complete, attention not detracted
specific place, certain environment required, attention not detracted
specific place, needed quiet, certain environment conditions, attention not detracted
Mental repetition of psychophysiol-ogically adapted verbal formulae whereby mental activity is conceived as ‘passive concentration’
Int: What was good about the training? P11: It was relaxing, had to set myself to listen to it. Get better at it as you know it more - know what's
coming.Int: Any additional comments about the training? P15: Was a slow start getting used to it and the voice and the gaps in between. After a week, it
went swimmingly. I'd never done it before. You know what's coming. Gradually you get to a point where you are calm after it.
Int: What didn’t you like about the training? P3: Difficult to talk through saying statements to themselves, goes against their nature. It would have been better if the two tracks linked together, it was a shame they didn't.
Preferred the first (PMR) one.P10: Saying feeling relaxed made me feel more awake - last part not as
good
felt relaxed, specific state, improve over time, certainly helpful
took time to adjust to process, better over time, new experience, certainty expected, wants to do it with someone, difficulty imagining, feel calmer, better
over timestatements were challenging, didn't fit with self, improvement suggestion, disliked gap, preferred
muscle exercises - positive experience
more awake, preferred PMR
Effects of relaxation training
Progressive muscle relaxation
Release the tension (in muscles)
See data above re: ‘Relaxes a group of muscles which are acquainted in a certain order’.
Absence of thinking and control of
Int: What was good about the training? P8: Put you in a better frame of mind with it than without it, coped better, mind didn't wander as much,
could focus easier.
helped mental state, helped coping, less distracted, better attention
153
images/attenti-on
Int: Any additional comments about the training? P15: ....Occasionally mind could wander at the beginning, had to be disciplined to stop mind
from wandering. First few sessions I was learning, I couldn't do it straight away. Able to control my mind and thoughts easier as time went on.
Int: What was good about the training? P9: Breathing - do start to relax. Nearly fell asleep a couple of times (not usually a good sleeper).
thinking at start, commitment to training, better over time, took time to learn,
attention could waver, focussed mind
enjoyed breathing, felt relaxed, almost slept, different experience to usual,
Autogenic relaxation
Counteracting of acute stress or fatigue
Int: What was good about the training? P11: It was relaxing, had to set myself to listen to it. Get better at it as you know It more - know what's
coming.P12: Relaxed when doing it. Took me away from my day
P6: Helped me go to sleep. Made me feel more relaxed. Helped during the day to be a little more patient, a little less 'het up about things'
P14: Made me have a rest from what I was doing - which I wouldn't normally do, taking time out, relaxing
felt relaxed, specific state, improve over time, certainly helpful
felt relaxed, time outhelped with sleep, felt more relaxed, helped
to be calmertime out, new different experience (not
usual), felt relaxedAchieve peace of mind
Int: What was good about the training? P6: Helped me go to sleep. Made me feel more relaxed. Helped during the day to be a little more patient, a
little less 'het up about things'P8: Put you in a better frame of mind with it than without it, coped better,
mind didn't wander as much, could focus easier.P15: Makes you focus on something, rather than silly little things that go through my mind. Feel calmer than before. Help concentrate on one thing - like a hobby. Can switch off from things around you. Difficult to quantify
what's changed. Mind goes back to a certain position.
helped with sleep, felt more relaxed, helped to be calmer
helped mental state, helped coping, less distracted, better attention
focus attention something different, change attention in mind, feel calmer, focus
attention, relate to other activities, focus attention, difficult to pinpoint change,
change in mind state
Cope with life’s pressures and improve coping abilities
Int: What was good about the training? P8: Put you in a better frame of mind with it than without it, coped better, mind didn't wander as much,
could focus easier.Int: Any additional comments about the training? P10: Preferred middle
helped mental state, helped coping, less distracted, better attention
preferred breathing and PMR, positive
154
bit to the words, PMR and breathing were better than saying words. Voice = very soothing, really good. 3 funerals in 1 week, disc helped her to cope. Tiredness is the worst thing with coping - what people say is really hard -
the worst thing. Would have liked more of the middle bit.Int: What was good about the training? P14: Yes, calmed me down a bit. In spite of everything else going on around me. Takes time out for self a little.
Body relaxes and found I relax with it.
experience of voice, life events, help with coping, tiredness is negative, improvement
suggestion
wants to continue, felt calmer, busy life, body relaxed, felt relaxed, time out for self
Additional themesPrioritising time
Positives of taking part
Int: What was good about the training? P9: Good to have 15 minutes to myself. Nice to have a quarter of an hour to myself. More did it, enjoyed it
more.P14: Yes, calmed me down a bit. In spite of everything else going on
around me. Takes time out for self a little. Body relaxes and found I relax with it.
Int: Any additional comments about the training? P12: Need to try and get a routine, there isn't one at the moment - things are manic and the days go. When got time for myself, filled it with everything else I needed to do. Will
keep trying to use the CD. I hope the study helps people like me.Int: Would you use this relaxation training in the future? If yes, why? If
not, why? P9: Think I might, pretty sure I would, if having a difficult time would take time out to do it.
Int: Would you use this relaxation training in the future? If yes, why? If not, why? P2: Yes, felt it was of benefit to me personally. Could see how it
could have helped in the early years post-stroke.Int: Any additional comments about the training? P1: was very sceptical
about it working but thought it has been helpful.
time to self, own time, more positive experience over time
wants to continue, felt calmer, busy life, body relaxed, felt relaxed, time out for self
routine is important, lack of time, busy life, lots to do, wants to continue, hopeful about
study
possible continuation, more certain about continuation, challenging experience,
specific circumstance to continue
wants to continue, beneficial effect, timing suggestion
initial scepticism, beneficial effect
155
Int: What was your experience of taking part in the study? P10: Really good thing because people don't think about carers, don't ask how they
are.Int: Any additional comments about the training? P16: Finds it very
relaxing, very nice when get to used to and has the time to use it. Surprised how well it worked, very nice. Can't use it as much as would like to. If
people are wary of it, give it a go because it's surprising how quickly you can feel relaxed.
positive experience, neglect of carers
felt relaxed, enjoyable, surprised at the outcome, takes time to use, recommend trying it despite scepticism, needs more
time, works quickly
Note. Int = interviewer, main researcher
156
Appendix R – Credibility Check of Deductive Thematic Analysis
A credibility check showed general agreement regarding data illustrating the theme ‘Reduction of exteroceptive and proprioceptive afferent stimulation, such that training should take place in a quiet room.’. Data related to the theme is underlined. Two additional responses to the question: ‘what time of day did you typically take part?’ were also categorised by the independent researcher as fitting the theme.
Questions asked by the main researcher to participants at the end of the relaxation training
Independent researcher ratings Main researcherratings
What time of day did you typically take part?
P8: First thing in the morning when wake and stroke survivor is still in bed
P9: Mainly evening ~7pm (before settling down to the telly). Chose to complete it at this time because no demands (little demands).
P15: First thing in the morning, before breakfast was best for me. Couldn't do it during the day = too noisy/distracting.
P15: First thing in the morning, before breakfast was best for me. Couldn't do it during the day = too noisy/distracting.
Where did you typically complete the training?
P2: In the living room with laptop. No distractions. Quiet environment.
P8: Sat in armchair in the lounge, easier to do it sitting up than lying down. Less distraction.
P13: Same place in the kitchen – tried to find a quiet place with no external noises.
P2: In the living room with laptop. No distractions. Quiet environment
P8: Sat in armchair in the lounge, easier to do it sitting up than lying down. Less distraction
P13: Same place in the kitchen - tried to find a quiet place without external noises
157
Part 2: Research
MRP Literature Review
Factors Influencing Anxiety in Caregivers of Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors:
A Systematic Review
Word count: 7991
(excluding Title Page, Abstract, Tables and Figures, References and Appendix)
158
Abstract
Anxiety experienced by caregivers of stroke survivors is highly prevalent, but little is
known about which factors influence its occurrence or maintenance. This review
aimed to systematically investigate what factors influence anxiety in caregivers of
community-dwelling stroke survivors. Systematic searches of Medline, PsycINFO,
Scopus and Web of Science databases were conducted. Studies included used an
objective, valid and reliable measure of anxiety; caregivers were informal (unpaid)
and supported stroke survivors who resided in the community. Studies which included
an intervention for caregivers were excluded. Quality appraisal of studies was
achieved by using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies – the
Effective Public Health Practice Tool. Twenty-one studies were identified which
objectively assessed anxiety of caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors.
Across the twenty-one studies, prevalence of significant anxiety was found in 11% to
51% of caregivers. Therefore, significant anxiety was found in all studies, even those
which assessed anxiety a considerable time post-stroke. Most consistently, caregivers
reporting considerable burden and symptoms of depression were more likely to
experience anxiety. Worse cognitive function of stroke survivors was also related to
elevated anxiety in caregivers. However, many studies did not adequately detail
factors which may increase anxiety. Less frequently researched factors included
unemployment, poorer health and stroke survivor anxiety, which also appeared related
to increased anxiety. Further research investigating caregiver unemployment, poorer
health and stroke survivor anxiety could therefore reveal whether these are also
consistently related to caregiver anxiety.
Keywords: stroke caregivers, anxiety, community, depression, burden
159
Introduction
Stroke is a foremost cause of long-term disability in the UK (Stroke Association,
2018). Nonetheless, due to improvements in stroke survival rates and stroke
rehabilitation, the majority of survivors (80%) return to their own home in the
community (e.g., Dobkin, 2014; Jaracz et al., 2015). Approximately two-thirds of
stroke survivors leave hospital with a disability (e.g. physical disability including
motor impairments, Adamson, Beswick, & Ebrahim, 2004; Stroke Association, 2018).
However, many require ongoing support for their needs (Kalra et al., 2004), with
family members increasingly fulfilling caregiving roles to support them (i.e. informal
caregivers, Olai, Borgquist, & Svärdsudd, 2015; Pandian, Gandhi, Lindley, & Bettger,
2016). Henceforth, the main, informal caregiver is defined as the person most closely
involved in supporting and caring for the stroke survivor at home in an unpaid
capacity (Choi-Kwon, Kim, Kwon, & Kim, 2005; Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010;
Jaracz et al., 2015).
Evidence suggests that the healthier stroke caregivers are, the better the long-
term rehabilitation outcome for stroke survivors (Glass, Matchar, Belyea, & Feussner,
1993; Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010; van Exel et al., 2004). Similarly, better
supported caregivers can improve survivors’ quality of life (Visser-Meily, van
Heugten, Post, Schepers, & Lindeman, 2005). Lower stress experienced by caregivers
was in turn predicted by caregivers’ with better perceived health, and was associated
with lower survivor-reported stress and better functioning (Ostwald, Bernal, Cron, &
Godwin, 2009). Therefore, supporting caregivers is essential for both parties.
Yet, caring for stroke survivors inevitably has a negative impact on the
caregiver, who is usually someone who previously enjoyed a close relationship with
160
the survivor, which has now qualitatively and potentially permanently altered
(Thompson & Ryan, 2009). The negative impact is likely due to the highly
demanding nature of the role: stroke can lead to a plethora of behavioural, cognitive,
emotional and physical changes (e.g., mobility issues, communication difficulties and
personality changes, Han & Haley, 1999). It has been reported that early post-stroke
caregivers find intervention usually focuses on information provision about stroke and
how to help stroke survivors physically (Camak, 2015; Reeves et al., 2017; Visser-
Meily et al., 2005), but generally they find a lack of support available post-discharge
(Jaracz et al., 2015; Simon & Kumar, 2002). Caregivers can feel undertrained,
underprepared and under-resourced (Kalra et al., 2004), and this can negatively
impact on their physical health (Haley, Roth, Howard, & Safford, 2010; Perkins et al.,
2013; Rigby, Gubitz, & Phillips, 2009) and emotional wellbeing (Greenwood &
Mackenzie, 2010; Greenwood, Mackenzie, Cloud, & Wilson, 2008).
For instance, systematic reviews have illustrated the high instance of burden
and depression in stroke caregivers. Burden is defined as the load or weight held by
caregivers due to fulfilling the caregiving role (Rigby et al., 2009). In a review of 24
studies, Rigby, Gubitz, and Phillips (2009) revealed a 25–54% prevalence of
considerable burden. Han and Haley (1999) found the prevalence of depression from
34–52% in seven reviewed studies. However, when scrutinising the included studies
to elicit possible predictors of caregiver burden factors (e.g., baseline predictors,
patient characteristics or social support factors) these were inconsistently reported
(Greenwood et al., 2008; Rigby et al., 2009). This constitutes a major limitation
because prediction could help target interventions, with an aim to help reduce the
burden and/or depression experienced (Han & Haley, 1999). Targeting interventions
is necessary for three main reasons: 1) the growing number of stroke patients who
161
survive, along with the ageing population, means the number of stroke survivors (and
therefore caregivers) is rapidly rising, 2) given the constraints on the health service in
the UK, funding is becoming limited to those most at risk (Oddy & da Silva Ramos,
2013) and 3) offering certain interventions to specific groups of people could be
harmful (e.g. offering relaxation treatment without graded exposure for some people
with panic disorder can lead to paradoxical increases in anxiety, Lilienfield, 2007).
A less explored area of research compared to caregiver depression and burden
is the impact of stroke on caregivers’ anxiety (Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010). This
is surprising firstly because of the widely accepted finding that anxiety and depression
significantly co-occur (e.g., > 50% of patients experience an anxiety and a depressive
disorder concurrently, Hirschfield, 2001; Kessler et al., 2003; 72% of patients with
major depressive disorder were also diagnosed with generalised anxiety disorder,
Zhou et al., 2017). Secondly, because of the consistent association between stroke
caregiver anxiety and depression with burden (Rigby et al., 2009). Thirdly, because
research suggests that caregivers’ anxiety can be more prevalent and more severe in
comparison to depression (Dankner et al., 2016; Williams, 1993). For example,
Carod-Artal, Coral, Trizotto and Moreira (2009) found the prevalence of significant
anxiety or depression in stroke caregivers was 23% and 12% respectively. Evidence
suggesting the high prevalence of anxiety post-stroke may be due to the stress of
caregiving and long-term uncertainty which can ensue (Greenwood & Mackenzie,
2010). For instance, caregivers can understandably be anxious about subsequent
strokes, as the best predictor of stroke is having had a previous stroke: approximately
one quarter of strokes every year are recurrent strokes (Furie et al., 2010; Stroke
Association, 2017). Furthermore, given the paucity of research on caregivers’ anxiety,
162
the best time for intervention is unknown. The adaptation hypothesis would predict
that caregivers will, after time, adjust to the new situation and find ways to cope
(Haley, Roth, Hovater, & Clay, 2015; Jaracz et al., 2015). Yet, how long this could
take, or whether it applies to anxiety in stroke caregivers will need to be determined.
For instance, the adaptation hypothesis may not account for the length of time people
are caregivers of stroke survivors, such that as time continues there could be more
challenges that caregivers need to adapt to and cope with (e.g. although these had
significantly declined from the level reported at 6-months post-stroke, over 50% of
caregivers continued to report considerable burden 5-years post-stroke, Jaracz et al.,
2015). This could mean that if the increasing demands on caregivers are greater than
their adaptation level, anxiety may not significantly reduce over time (Tsai, 2003).
Consequently, the possible impact of time since stroke on caregivers’ anxiety needs to
be explored.
Nevertheless, a number of studies have begun to consider how caregiver and
stroke survivor characteristics contribute to caregiver anxiety (Alexander & Wilz,
2010), but these have not been summarised and evaluated. If common factors are
revealed, this would have important implications for predicting which caregivers
could be more likely to experience anxiety. Interventions could be targeted at these
groups to help caregivers, and in turn lead to better outcomes for stroke survivors. As
the majority of stroke survivors return home, this review will focus on anxiety
reported by caregivers in the community. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to
systematically investigate which survivor and caregiver factors may influence anxiety
in caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors.
163
Method
Study Selection
Electronic searches were carried out in February 2017 and repeated in May
2018 using four databases: PsychINFO, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science. This
produced 149, 277, 363 and 279 studies respectively. The terms ‘stroke’, ‘caregiver’
and ‘anxiety’ and their equivalent terms were entered in full-text searches of the
databases (see full range of search terms in Appendix B). Titles and/or abstracts were
subsequently read and studies that met the selection criteria (detailed below) were
included. References of included papers were also screened, with relevant papers
investigated. Contact with study authors was made when it was unclear where
participants resided during the study. Figure 1 details the process of study selection,
with 21 included studies.
Selection Criteria
As outlined by Cochrane (Higgins & Green, 2008), there were four main
criteria utilised to determine which studies to include in the systematic review, with
exclusion criteria summarised in Table 1.
Types of studies.
Studies included used at least one measurement of anxiety which was
completed whilst the stroke survivor resided in the community. Therefore, studies
could be cross-sectional or longitudinal in design. Studies had to investigate whether
factors were related to anxiety using statistical methods (e.g. using correlational
analyses).
164
PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram
Records identified through database searching
(n = 1068)
Scre
eni
ngIn
clu
ded
Elig
ibi
lity
Iden
tific
ati
on
Additional records identified through other sources (e.g. from reference lists of
papers)(n = 97)
Records after duplicates removed(n = 962)
Records screened(n = 962)
Records excluded, with common reasons(n = 820)
- Stroke survivors were in inpatient settings for the whole study
- Standardised measure of anxiety with good psychometric properties was
not used- Caregivers of stroke patients did not
comprise the whole sampleFull-text articles assessed for
eligibility(n = 142)
Studies included in qualitative synthesis(n = 21)
Full-text articles excluded, with reasons(n = 121)
- Did not measure anxiety in caregivers: (n = 86)
- Stroke survivor did not clearly live in community (n = 12)
- Objective, validated measure of anxiety not used (n = 9)
- Did not analyse factors in relation to caregiver anxiety (n = 6)
- Effect of a specific intervention assessed (n = 3)
- Meta-analytic review (n = 1)- Protocol for prospective study (n = 1)
- Stroke survivor was not an adult (n = 1)
- Patients included with other neurological conditions (n = 1)
- Not published in English (n = 1)
165
Figure 1. PRIMSA diagram of study selection
Table 1
Summary of exclusion criteria with reasons given
Selection criteria Exclusion criteria Reasons givenTypes of studies No measurement of caregiver anxiety
included in the communityNo investigation of variables in relation to
anxiety
To enhance internal validity of findings by assessing results
found in one settingTo meet the study aim
Types of participants
Caregivers of adult stroke survivors only in inpatient settings (e.g. hospital) who did not
return home or to live in the community during the study period
Caregivers were paid for their service i.e. a professional caregiver rather than a family
memberWhole sample did not comprise of caregivers
of people with a stroke (e.g. caregivers of people with different neurological
conditions)
To increase internal validity of findings as caregivers of
people residing in inpatient settings have different
demandsThere are increasingly more
informal caregivers, and professional caregivers have different demands – would
compromise the internal and external validity of findings
To increase internal validity of findings
Types of intervention
Intervention was the focus of the study Likely to provide a different focus i.e. whether the
intervention reduces anxiety, rather than factors which could
make caregivers more susceptible to experiencing
anxiety
Types of outcome measures
Anxiety was not measured using an objective tool with good psychometric properties
To increase reliability of findings
Other Not published in EnglishPublished in journals that were not peer-
reviewed
Unable to understandLess reliable sources
Types of participants.
Informal caregivers of adult stroke survivors who were currently residing in the
community. Caregivers were not required to live with the stroke survivor.
Types of intervention.
166
No intervention was required. Studies comparing pre- and post- levels of
anxiety involving a specific intervention (e.g. targeting anxiety) were not included.
Studies involving an intervention are likely to provide a different focus, i.e. whether
the intervention reduces anxiety, rather than factors which could make caregivers
more susceptible to experiencing anxiety.
Types of outcome measures.
Data pertaining to anxiety that was quantified using an objective measure of
anxiety with good psychometric properties, in other words, a reliable and validated
measure of anxiety in either general or clinical populations. This included measures
with sub-scales of anxiety, which had also been validated.
Quality Assessment of Studies.
Studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative
Studies – the Effective Public Health Practice Tool (EPHPP, see Appendix C) by the
first two study authors. As there is no consensus from the health authorities regarding
a preferred appraisal tool (Quigley, Thompson, Halfpenny, & Scott, 2018), this tool
was chosen because it evaluates a range of study designs including RCTs, non-
randomised controlled studies and uncontrolled studies. Good psychometric
properties (i.e., content and construct validity, and substantial test re-test reliability, κ
= .74, McHugh, 2012; Thomas, Ciliska, Dobbins, & Micucci, 2004) have been shown
when assessing the quality of studies, which is lacking for many quality assessment
instruments (Armijo-Olivo, Stiles, Hagen, Biondo, & Cummings, 2010; Crowe &
Sheppard, 2011). Whilst originally intended to be used to assess the effectiveness of
interventions (Armijo-Olivo et al., 2010), it covers a range of six domains considered
167
important when assessing the quality of studies (Quigley et al., 2018): selection bias,
study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and
drop-outs. Similarly, this tool has been used to ascertain the quality of studies
assessing patients with long-term health conditions when following standard care
guidelines (Chang, Hwang, & Kasimis, 2002), and as such has been deemed
appropriate to assess outcomes of patients over time given the lack of non-
intervention specific quality assessment tools (Katrak, Bialocerkowski, Massy-
Westropp, Kumar, & Grimmer, 2004; Quigley et al., 2018). Therefore, it was deemed
appropriate to be used to assess the quality of studies.
The aforementioned six domains were rated as strong (1 point), moderate (2
points) or weak (3 points). For example, if data collection tools were shown to be
valid and reliable, this would be rated as ‘1 = strong’ for data collection. The first
blinding question was omitted as it did not apply to non-intervention studies. More
information regarding ratings are shown in italics in the dictionary tool in Appendix
C. Overall quality ratings of studies were then assigned in relation to strong (0 weak
ratings given), moderate (1 weak rating given) and weak (2 or more weak ratings
given, EPHPP, 2010).
168
Results
Excluded Studies
Overall 121 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Figure 1 includes reasons
for exclusion of studies.
Included Studies
Twenty-one studies were reviewed. The sample size, demographics, time since stroke,
measures utilised and key findings in relation to caregiver anxiety are presented in
Table 2.
169
Table 2
Summary of studies investigating anxiety in caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors
StudyFirst author (date)Country conducted
Aims of study N caregiversDropout
(%)N/A = not applicable
Demographics
% female, mean age in years (SD)NR = not reported
Time since stroke (months)
T = time
Design Outcomes measured Key findings
Alexander (2010)Germany
Explore gender differences in spousal
caregivers’ adjustment to stroke, including survivor’s mental impairment,
caregivers’ depressive symptoms,
caregivers’ physical complaints and
caregivers’ anxiety symptoms.
T1: 97T2: 8018%
Caregivers: 68%, 55.2
(10.3)Survivors: NR, 57.6
(9.5)
2.6 (T1)15 (T2)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety (BAI – German), depression (BDI – German), physical
complaints (GBB-24)Survivors: functional independence
(BI), depression (CDS), self-awareness (PCRS)
Female caregivers reported significantly higher anxiety than male
caregivers at T2, but no significant differences were found at T1. At T2,
male caregiver anxiety was more strongly related to survivors’ cognitive
function than female caregivers’ anxiety was.
Stroke survivor depression was associated with higher caregiver
anxiety.
Anderson (1995)Australia
Determine the impact of caregiving for
stroke survivors at 1-year post-stroke.
8412%
Caregivers: 82%, 58
(NR)Survivors: 38%, 70
(NR)
0 (T1) 4 (T2) 12 (T3)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), emotional distress (GHQ-28),
impact on social role and burden (SBAS)
Survivors: disability (OHS), functional independence (BI and modified FAI),
cognitive function (MMSE)
Provision of community services did not impact on caregiver anxiety.
Atteih (2015)Ireland
Ascertain the factors that influence the
occurrence of anxious and
depressive symptoms in stroke caregivers.
162N/A
Caregivers: 76%, 59.4
(15.3)Survivors: 34%, 68.3
(12.5)
6 approx. Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), satisfaction with care (QCS),
risk of health deterioration (VES)Survivors: cognitive function (MoCA), dependency in activities of daily living (mRS), stroke severity (SSS), anxiety
Caregiver anxiety was predicted by stroke survivor anxiety, depression, and stroke survivor cognitive impairment.
170
and depression (HADS)Carod-Artal (2009)Brazil
Assess the prevalence of burden and mood disorders
in caregivers of Brazilian stroke
survivors.Examine the
association between burden, mood and
health status of caregivers.
200N/A
Caregivers: 77%, 42 (14.1)
Survivors: 46%, 57.7
(13.7)
20.9 Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), burden (ZCDI), quality of life
(EQ-5Q)Survivors: anxiety and depression (HADS), stroke severity (NIHSS),
dependency in activities of daily living (mRS), functional independence (BI),
cognitive function (MMSE)
Anxiety was significantly higher in female caregivers than in males. Significant positive correlation between caregiver burden and
caregiver anxiety.Survivors’ physical and cognitive function were positively correlated
with caregivers’ anxiety.
Choi-Kwon (2005)South Korea
Identify factors affecting caregiver
burden in South Korea, approximately 3 years after stroke.
145N/A
Caregivers: 79%, 55
(NR)Survivors: NR, NR
40.8 Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), capacity to care (SCQ)
Survivors: dependency in activities of daily living (mRS), cognitive function
(MMSE), depression (DSM-IV criteria)
Caregiver factors affecting their anxiety included being female, feeling
burdened, being unemployed, poor health and low education level; the
survivor factors included aphasia and severe physical functioning
impairment.Cumming (2008)Australia
Assess the psychological impact
of informal caregiving at 3-years
post-stroke, investigating the impact of social
support, depression, anxiety, irritability, strain and caregiver
gender.
116N/A
Caregivers: 71%, 66.9
(13.3)Survivors: 32%, 69.6
(13.7)
36 Cross-sectional
Caregivers: irritability, depression and anxiety (IDAS), social support (MOS-
SSS), strain (CSI)Survivors: irritability, depression and anxiety (IDAS), social support (MOS-
SSS), functional independence (BI, LHS), dependency in activities of daily
living (mRS)
More social support was correlated with less anxiety for caregivers.
Dankner (2016)Israel
Compare well-being between stroke
survivors and their caregivers at 1-year
post-stroke.Examine associations between well-being,
51N/A
Caregivers: 82%, 65.6
(8.3)Survivors: 14%, 68.1
(6.7)
Median = 71 Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), burden (ZCBI), health-related
quality of life (SF-36)Survivors: functional independence
(BI), dependency in activities of daily living (mRS), health-related quality of life (SF-36), anxiety and depression
Caregiver anxiety was the only characteristic that was associated with
overall caregiver burden.
171
survivor characteristics and caregiver burden.
(HADS), comorbidity of health conditions (CCI)
Greenwood (2010)UK
Examine anxiety in informal caregivers at approximately 1-month and 3-months
after the stroke survivors’ discharge.
T1: 47 T2: 45
4%
Caregivers: 62%, 49% under 60
Survivors: NR, NR
Discharge (T1) 3-months post-discharge (T2)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS)
No significant difference between caregiver anxiety at discharge and 3-
months post discharge.
Jaracz (2014)Poland
Evaluate the severity of burden
experienced by caregivers.
Identify predictors of caregiver burden
from the characteristics of
survivors and caregivers – focusing
on sense of coherence and
emotional status.
HADS-A: 8.57 (4.71) Cut-off ≥
11: 49 (33%)
Caregivers: 83%, 53.5
(13.9)Survivors: NR, NR
During hospitalization (T1) – collected demographics 6-months post-discharge (T2)
– outcome measures
Prospective cross-sectional
Caregivers: burden (Polish CBS), anxiety and depression (HADS), sense of coherence (SOC-29), social support
(BSSS)Survivors: functional independence
(BI), stroke severity (SSS), communicative ability (DAAS),
depression (GDS)
Higher caregiver anxiety was found to be a strong predictor of higher levels of
burden.
Jaracz (2015)Poland
Assess the prevalence of
considerable burden among stroke
survivors’ caregivers at 6-months and 5-years post-stroke.
Analyse changes in burden over time.Identify factors
T1: 150T2: 8841%
Caregivers: 83%, 53.6
(12.1)Survivors: 43%, 61.1
(12.2)
6-months post-discharge (T1)5-years after stroke (T2)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), burden (CBS), social support
(BPSS), sense of coherence (SOC), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF)Survivors: stroke severity (SSS),
functional independence (BI), depression (GDS)
Caregiver anxiety predicted burden at T1 and T2; it was the only predictive
factor at T2.
172
associated with burden over time.
Lau (2012)Hong Kong
Identify factors associated with Chinese stroke
caregivers’ depressive symptoms.
123N/A
Caregivers: 72%, 61.4
(12.4) Survivors: 35%, 72.1
(10.0)
27.9 Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety (HADS-A), comorbidity of health conditions (CIRS), burden (CBS – Chinese version), social support received
(LSNS – Chinese version), adverse life events (MLES), fatigue (single
question), service use/support utilised (questionnaire on rehabilitative or
enhancement servicesfor families and caregivers – Chinese
version)Survivors: depression (Chinese version
– GDS), comorbidity of health conditions (CIRS) functional
independence (BI and IADL), cognitive function (MMSE – Cantonese version)
Higher caregiver depressive symptomatology was correlated with
more caregiver anxiety. Higher caregiver anxiety was correlated with more depressive symptomatology in
survivors
Lui (2012)Hong Kong
Describe the relationships between
caregiver self-appraised problem-
solving and caregiver outcomes –
psychological health, physical well-being and social support at
1-week prior to discharge and 3-
months post-discharge.
T1: 103 T2:8517%
Caregivers: 84%, 50 (13.5)
Survivors: 45%, 69.7
(8.3)
1-week before discharge (T1)3-months post-discharge (T2)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), health-related quality of life (SF-36) social support (MOS-SSS), problem-solving (PSI), caregiving
difficulties (CAS), strain (CSI)Survivors: depression (CES-D),
functional independence (LHS, MBI)
Caregiver anxiety reduced over time.
173
Macnamara (1990)USA
Characterise caregiver strain in
caregivers of stroke survivors who did not
seek professional support.
41N/A
Caregivers: 83%, 59.3
(10.9)Survivors: NR, 67.6
(4.5)
14.63 Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety, depression and hostility (POMS), strain (CSI)
Survivors: functional independence (BI)
Caregiver anxiety increased in-line with time since stroke.
Mei (2018)China
Assess the relationships between
benefit finding, caregiver burden and psychological well-
being.
145N/A
Caregivers: 70%, 50.4
(13.3)Survivors: 30%, 66.3
(15.7)
Caregivers had been providing care for more than 3 months
Cross-sectional
Caregivers: burden (Chinese CBI), benefit finding (Chinese PAC), anxiety
and depression (Chinese HADS)Survivors: functional independence
(BI)
More anxiety was correlated with higher burden. Lower economic status
was associated with being more anxious in caregivers. Higher anxiety was associated with being a caregiver
of a younger stroke survivor.Ozge (2009)Turkey
Investigate caregiver, survivor and city
based characteristics in relation to
caregiver burden 6-months post-stroke.
198NR
Caregivers: 78%, 44.5
(13.4)Survivors: 37.3% 65.9
(13.1)
0 (T1) 6 (T2)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety (BAI), depression (BDI), stress (CSS)
Survivors: stroke severity (GCS, NIHSS), functional independence (BI),
anxiety (BAI)
Female caregivers were more likely to be anxious. Caregiver anxiety reduced
over time.Caregiver anxiety was more likely in
survivors with poorer physical functioning.
Pucciarelli (2018)Italy
Describe stroke caregivers’ quality of
life, anxiety, depression and
burden at 1-year post-discharge from a
rehabilitation hospital.
Determine baseline predictors of stroke
caregivers’ quality of life, anxiety,
depression and burden among
24445%
Caregivers: 65%, 53 (13)
Survivors: 50%, 71 (12)
Discharge from rehabilitation
hospital (T1) 3-months post-
discharge (T2) 6-months post-discharge (T3) 9-months post-discharge (T4)
12-months post-discharge (T5)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), burden (CBI), quality of life
(WHOQOL-BREF)Survivors: functional independence
(BI), comorbidity of health conditions (CCI)
Caregiver anxiety reduced over time (up to 9 months post-discharge), then
increased at 12-months post-discharge. Only significant predictor of higher
caregiver anxiety was survivor younger age.
174
caregivers’ and survivors’
characteristics.Smith (2004)UK
Measure at 1-year post-stroke informal caregivers’ stress and
coping using caregiver well-being.
90N/A
Caregivers: 72%, 58
(NR)Survivors: 38%, 68
(NR)
12 approx. Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), health-related quality of life (SF-36), coping (CAMI), satisfaction
with caring (CASI), stress (CADI)Survivors: functional independence (BI
and FAI), cognitive function (Hodkinson Test)
Total hours spent caring was associated with higher anxiety. Lower caregiver health was associated with increased
caregiver anxiety.
Sreedhan (2013)India
Investigate employment status and level of change of social functioning of stroke survivors and their caregiver
and correlate it with severity of stroke,
functional disability, and anxiety and
depression symptoms.
150N/A
Caregivers: NR, NR
Survivors: 23%, 54.4
(12.1)
3 months – 2 years (mean
NR)
Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety and depression (HADS), employment status pre- and post-stroke, social function status (6
questions which were culturally relevant to Indian context), burden
(BAS-adapted)Survivors: stroke severity (NIHSS),
dependency in activities of daily living (mRS), social function status (6 questions which were culturally
relevant to Indian context), anxiety and depression (HADS), employment status
pre- and post-stroke
Caregiver employment loss post-stroke had an association with high anxiety
scores.
Wan-Fei (2017)Malaysia
Examine the effect of depression and
anxiety on quality of life in stroke
survivor-caregiver dyads.
30N/A
Caregivers: 73%, 47 (14.1)
Survivors: 33%, 49 (16.5)
Almost 3 years Cross-sectional
Caregivers: quality of life (Malay SF-12), anxiety and depression (Malay
HADS)Survivors: quality of life (Malay SF-12), dependency in activities of daily
living (mRS), functional independence (BI), anxiety and depression (Malay
HADS)
Greater anxiety in caregivers was related to a decrease in their perceived quality of life in relation to their mental
functioning.
Williams (1993)USA
Pilot test questionnaires with a
group of stroke survivors and
caregivers.Describe caregivers
29N/A
Caregivers: 72%, 56.4
(3.4)Survivors: NR, NR
73.4 Cross-sectional
Caregivers: anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms and anger-hostility (SQ), burden (CBI), perceived burden
of physical health (CHIPS)
Caregiver anxiety positively correlated with burden and depression.
175
in terms of their physical and
emotional wellbeing, and their feelings associated with
possible caregiving stress.
Wilz (2008)Germany
Investigate the prevalence of and
changes in spouses’ anxiety symptoms
over time.Explore factors associated with
spousal caregivers’ anxiety symptoms.
T1: 151 T2: 114
25%
Caregivers: 72%, 58 (11.4)
Survivors: NR, 60 (10.6)
2.6 months after stroke (T1)
15-months post-stroke (T2)
Prospective
longitudinal
cohort
Caregivers: anxiety (BAI), depression (CDS)
Survivors: depression (CDS), functional independence (BI), self-
awareness (PCRS)
Female caregivers experienced significantly higher anxiety compared
to male caregivers, which was consistent over time.
Survivors’ dependency in everyday life was significantly associated with anxiety at 15-months post-stroke.
Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC), Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (BI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Berlin Perceived Social Support Scale (BPSS), Berlin Social Support Scale (BSSS), Burden Assessment Schedule (BAS), Caregiver Assessment Scale (CAS), Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS), Caregiver Strain Index (CSI), Caregiver Stress Scale (CSS), Carers’ Assessment of Difficulties Index (CADI), Carers’ Assessment of Managing Index (CAMI), Carers’ Assessment of Satisfaction (with caring) (CASI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Cohen-Hoberman Inventory of Physical Symptoms (CHIPS), Cornell Depression Scale (CDS), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), Dynamic Assessment of Aphasia Scale (DAAS), Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5Q), Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Giessen Complaints List (GBB-24), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Irritability, Depression and Anxiety Scale (IDAS), Knowledge of Stroke Questionnaire (KSQ), Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), London Handicap Scale (LHS), Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS), Medical Outcome Study Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Modified Life Events Scale (MLES), Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), National Institute of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS), Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (EADL), Oxford Handicap Scale (OHS), Patient Competency Rating Scale modified for use with stroke patients (PCRS), Positive Aspects of Caregiver Questionnaire (PAC), Profile of Mood States (POMS), Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB), Quality of Care Survey (QCS), Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS), Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ), Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-29), Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SCQ), Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), Social Behaviour Assessment Schedule (SBAS), Social Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI), Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39), Symptom Questionnaire (SQ), Vulnerable Elders Scale (VES), World Health Organisation Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), Zarit Caregiver Burden Index (ZCBI)
176
Study design.
Studies investigating caregiver anxiety comprised of two designs: cross-
sectional (13 studies) and prospective longitudinal cohort (eight studies). All studies
adopted a quantitative approach to data collection and analysis. For longitudinal
studies, the focus of results reported is on caregiver anxiety when the survivor was in
the community (i.e. after discharge from hospital/rehabilitation settings). Length of
time between measurements ranged from 3 months to approximately 4.5 years. If
longitudinal studies included an earlier measurement of anxiety whilst stroke
survivors were in inpatient settings, then this will not be especially discussed due to
the specific focus on caregiver anxiety of stroke survivors in community settings.
Sample size.
The number of caregivers varied across studies (mean = 119, range = 29–244).
In total 2506 caregivers were included. For longitudinal studies, drop-out ranged from
4% to 45%.
Target population.
Most participants were recruited through stroke units, rehabilitation centres
and neurological clinics, through adopting a systematic manner by asking all patients
at specific time points to participate. More robustly, Choi-Kwon, Kim, Kwon, and
Kim (2005) randomly chose participants from stroke medical centres and Anderson,
Linto, and Stewartwynne (1995) selected participants via a register of acute
cerebrovascular events. However, two studies recruited through self-selection in
community samples.
177
Population characteristics.
Every study had more female caregivers participate compared to male
caregivers: 62–84% female. All studies had more male stroke survivors compared to
female stroke survivors. Mean age of caregivers varied, with caregivers typically
being in their fifties (mean = 55.1 years, range = 42–66.9 years). Where reported, in
every study caregivers on average were younger than stroke survivors. Similar to
caregivers, a large range of mean ages for stroke survivors were found (mean = 64.5
years, range = 49–72 years); although four studies did not report stroke survivor ages.
Twenty-one studies were conducted across fourteen different countries.
Quality assessment of studies.
Studies were assessed using the EPHPP. The quality rating of studies ranged
from weak (n = 10), moderate (n = 9) to strong (n = 2, see Table 3). The ratings of the
studies provided indications where studies in this field may require improvements or
are areas of strength, each area of quality assessed using the tool will now be
summarised.
Overall, studies were of moderate quality in relation to possible selection bias.
Generally, participants were ‘somewhat likely’ to represent the target population with
reasonable agreement when asked to participate because they were mostly from
rehabilitation centres, but usually did not use random selection which could limit the
generalisability of the results. Most studies were cross-sectional in design, which
means that the impact of time was not always considered, although some longitudinal
studies did address this. As the EPHPP was originally intended for use with
178
intervention studies, this was a limitation because some of the ratings categories for
study designs did not accurately capture studies included in this review. Many study
designs were rated as ‘other’, this means that any studies which did not have a
specified design as per the tool were classified as ‘weak’ in this category. Therefore,
studies may not have been validly rated on this dimension because ‘other’ could
reflect designs of varying quality. The majority of studies used correlational analyses,
this represents a key weakness of not controlling for possible confounders. There
could be other variables contributing to significant results found, for instance gender
is thought to directly relate to anxiety, and so it is useful to control for this variable
when assessing caregiver anxiety. Some studies which found significant relationships
between variables and anxiety then controlled for these in further analyses, such as
gender in Alexander and Wilz (2010); this approach would be encouraged in future
studies. Correlational analyses also do not provide information regarding the
causation of relationships, although this would be difficult to remedy unless large
populations were followed before a stroke occurs. Rating of blinding was not
considered appropriate due to studies not involving an intervention so this was rated
as not applicable. All studies included a valid and reliable measure of anxiety for an
adult population, which is a significant strength of the studies. A limitation was that
there was significant drop-out in some of the longitudinal studies which limits
possible conclusions made from these analyses, such that participants with higher
anxiety could have dropped out. Therefore, conclusions could be biased and be less
generalisable to other stroke caregivers. Whilst some studies tested for differences
between completers and those who dropped out, this was uncommon and will be
discussed more in the discussion section.
179
Table 3
Quality assessment of studies completed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies
First author (date)
Selection Study design
Confo-unders
Blinding Data collection methods
Withdra-wals and drop-outs
Global rating and average score
Alexand-er (2010)
** ** * N/A * * *
Anderson (1995)
** ** *** N/A * * **
Atteih (2015)
** *** * N/A * ** **
Carod-Artal (2009)
** *** ** N/A * ** **
Choi-Kwon (2005)
*** *** *** N/A * ** ***
Cumming (2008)
** *** ** N/A * ** **
Dankner (2016)
** *** ** N/A * ** **
Greenw-ood (2010)
** ** *** N/A * * **
Jaracz (2014)
** *** *** N/A * ** ***
Jaracz (2015)
** ** *** N/A * *** ***
Lau (2012)
** *** *** N/A * ** ***
Lui (2012)
*** ** *** N/A * * ***
Macnam-ara (1990)
** *** *** N/A * ** ***
Mei (2018)
*** *** ** N/A * ** ***
Ozge (2009)
** ** * N/A * *** **
Pucciarel-li (2018)
** ** * N/A * *** **
Smith (2004)
** *** * N/A * ** **
Sreedhan (2013)
** *** *** N/A * ** ***
Wan-Fei (2017)
** *** *** N/A * ** ***
Williams *** *** *** N/A * ** ***
180
(1993)Wilz (2008)
** ** * N/A * ** *
Note. * indicates the strength of the evidence: * = strong ** = moderate *** = weak. N/A = not applicable.
Occurrence of caregiver anxiety.
Fifteen studies reported the mean anxiety levels of caregivers, using reliable
and valid measures. Eleven of these studies utilised the Hospital Anxiety and
Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), three used the Beck Anxiety
Inventory (BAI, Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988) and one used the Symptom
Questionnaire (Williams, 1993, see Table 4). Often, studies translated and adapted the
HADS and BAI when using them in different cultural populations, and reported
appropriate reliability and validity statistics (e.g., HADS in Italy, Pucciarelli et al.,
2018; BAI in Germany, Alexander & Wilz, 2010). Internal reliability of anxiety
measures was only calculated in one study (Cronbach’s alpha of Italian HADS-A =
0.82, Pucciarelli et al., 2018).
181
Table 4
Measures of anxiety used in studies
Measure Construct measured; items and scale
Scoring and interpretation
Psychometrics
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)
14-item questionnaire with seven questions related to symptoms of anxiety and depression each, these represent the HADS-A and HADS-D subscales.Widely used measure of symptoms of anxiety and depression.
Items are scored on a scale of 0 to 3. When summed they indicate the degree of anxiety and depression, with higher scores indicating greater levels of these respectively.
The HADS-A has been validated against other clinical measures of anxiety, such as the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory – State Form (Bjelland, Dahl, Haug, & Neckelmann, 2002). Good internal consistency has been shown for the HADS-A (mean α = 0.83).
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI, Beck et al., 1988).
21-item questionnaire which assesses common anxiety symptoms on a 4-point scale.Extensively used in clinical and research populations (Muntingh et al., 2011).
4-point scale is scored from 0 to 3. All responses are summed to comprise a total anxiety score, with the higher the score indicative of more anxiety symptoms.
Excellent internal consistency has been demonstrated (α = 0.92, Beck et al., 1988).Has been validated against other anxiety measures including the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Fydrich, Dowdall, & Chambless, 1992). Discriminant validity in relation to depression has also been illustrated (Enns, Cox, Parker, & Guertin, 1998).
Symptom Questionna-ire (SQ, Williams, 1993)
Consists of 92-items and estimates distress across four domains (subscales): anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms and anger-hostility.
Each subscale is subdivided into a Symptom subscale and a Well-being subscale. The maximum score for each Symptom subscale is 17 and for each Well-being subscale is 6, see Kellner (1983) for further information.Higher scores indicate more distress, such as more anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms and anger-hostility.
Internal consistency of all subscales were excellent (α = 0.92 for the anxiety subscale). Validity has been shown with respect to the concurrent validity with the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale and in discriminating between placebo and treatment conditions (Kellner, 1983; Kellner & Sheffield, 1973).
Profile of Contains 65 Items are scored from Good internal consistency has
182
Mood States (PMOS, Macnamara, Gummow, Goka, & Gregg, 1990)
words/statements that describe the feelings people have.Used to assess levels of anxiety, depression and hostility (McNair, Lorr, & Droppleman, 1971).
0 to 4.Higher scores indicate more distress.
been reported for the Profile of Mood States (α = 0.63–0.96).Good concurrent validity has been assessed with conceptually similar scales, such as the Psychological Wellbeing Scale (r = -0.68, McNair et al., 1971; Statistics Solutions, 2018).
Irritability, Depression and Anxiety Scale (IDAS, Cumming, Cadilhac, Rubin, Crafti, & Pearce, 2008)
Measures anxiety, depression, inward irritability and outward irritability
Items are scored from 0 to 3, with the higher the score the more indicative of difficulty in the components.
It has been validated in a general hospital setting and has shown good concurrent validity with the Clinical Anxiety Scale (r = 0.51, Aylard, Gooding, McKenna, & Snaith, 1987; Portney & Watkins, 2007).Internal consistency for the Anxiety subscale ranged from acceptable to good (α = 0.74–0.87, Snaith, Constantopoulos, Jardine, & McGuffin, 1978).
Fourteen studies classified the degree of caregiver anxiety but the method of
doing this varied. Within this, the characterisation or ‘cut off’ for clinically significant
anxiety varied, as well as the questionnaires used. Nine studies utilised the HADS-A
to operationalise significant anxiety (‘borderline’ or ‘abnormal’ anxiety characterized
by a score of 8 [n = 3] or 11 [n = 6] respectively). Studies utilising the BAI (n =
3) and the Irritability Depression Anxiety Scale (n = 1) all characterised clinical
anxiety differently. These differences in classification mean comparison between
studies and eliciting key factors related to caregivers’ anxiety should be made with
caution. The proportion of caregivers experiencing these considerable levels of
anxiety ranged from 11–51% for borderline anxiety and from 6–33% for abnormal
anxiety.
Two studies did not report the mean, prevalence or cut offs of anxiety.
Factors related to anxiety.
183
Studies have investigated a range of factors in relation to caregiver anxiety
post-stroke (Table 5). These typically can be categorised into caregiver and stroke
survivor characteristics, with sub-categories of demographic characteristics, well-
being and time since stroke, and with the addition of functioning for survivors.
Findings will be discussed sequentially, focusing initially on factors which have been
researched more extensively by studies as this allows for more robust conclusions to
be made. The majority of studies evaluated potential factors that correlate with
caregiver anxiety post-stroke.
Table 5
Factors examined in relation to caregiver anxiety, with studies which found a significant relationship and/or no relationship reported
Factor associated with higher anxiety unless otherwise stated
Significant relationship, p < .05
Effect size for significant
relationships found
No relationship
CaregiverGender (female) Alexander & Wilz (2010)
Carod-Artal, Coral, Trizotto, & Moreira (2009)
Choi-Kwon et al. (2005) Ozge et al. (2009)
Wilz & Kalytta (2008)
d = .67NR
NRd = 0.6d = 0.44
Alexander & Wilz (2010)
Atteih et al. (2015) Jaracz, Grabowska-Fudala, Górna, & Kozubski (2014)
Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
Longitudinal studies (anxiety reduced over time)
Lui, Lee, Greenwood, & Ross (2012)
Ozge et al. (2009) Pucciarelli et al. (2018) Wilz & Kalytta (2008)
NR
NRNR
β = 0.57
Alexander & Wilz (2010)
Greenwood & Mackenzie (2010) Jaracz et al. (2015)
Burden (higher) Carod-Artal et al. (2009) Choi-Kwon et al. (2005) Dankner et al. (2016)
Mei, Wilson, Lin, Li, & Zhang (2018)
Williams (1993)
r = .61d = 0.71β = 1.11r = .60
r = .52
0
Age (older) 0 Alexander & Wilz (2010)
Cumming et al. (2008) Jaracz et al. (2014)
Pucciarelli et al. (2018) Wilz & Kalytta (2008)
184
Health, including quality of life (poorer)
Choi-Kwon et al. (2005) Smith et al. (2004)
Wan-Fei et al. (2017) Williams (1993)
NRβ = -0.10 β = -0.58
r = .65
Wan-Fei et al. (2017)
Depressive symptoms (higher)
Atteih et al. (2015) Lau, Tang, Wong, Mok, &
Ungvari (2012)Williams (1993)
OR = 5.07r = .61
r = .82
0
Unemployment Choi-Kwon et al. (2005) Sreedhan et al. (2013)
NRNR
Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
Level of education (low)
Choi-Kwon et al. (2005) NR Alexander & Wilz (2010)
Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
Relationship to survivor
Wives were significantly more anxious than
husbands or parents (Carod-Artal et al., 2009)
NR Adult child vs. spouses (Cumming et al., 2008)
Socio-economic status (lower)
Mei et al. (2018) F = 6.36 Sreedhan et al. (2013)
Social support (lower)/functioning (decline)
Cumming et al. (2008) β = -0.61 Sreedhan et al. (2013)
Time spent caregiving (higher)
Smith et al. (2004) R2 > 10%, β = .03 Carod-Artal et al. (2009)
Benefit finding (less)
Mei et al. (2018) r = -.38 0
Living arrangement (living with the survivor)
0 Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
Increase in visits to religious places
Sreedhan et al. (2013) r = .02 0
SurvivorFunctional status (lower)
Carod-Artal et al. (2009) Choi-Kwon et al. (2005)
Ozge et al. (2009)
r = -.03NR
r = -.27
Alexander & Wilz (2010)
Cumming et al. (2008) Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
Smith et al. (2004) Wilz & Kalytta (2008)
Mental health (worse)
Alexander & Wilz (2010) Atteih et al. (2015)
Carod-Artal et al. (2009) Lau et al. (2012)
Smith et al. (2004)
r = .3OR = 5.17
r = .16r = .03
β = .29, β = .39
Cumming et al. (2008) Wilz & Kalytta (2008)
185
Cognitive impairment
Alexander & Wilz (2010) Atteih et al. (2015)
Carod-Artal et al. (2009) Choi-Kwon et al. (2005)
r = -.33OR = 2.35
r = -.08NR
0
Age (younger) Mei et al. (2018) Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
r = -.22β = -.053
0
Time since stroke (longer)
Macnamara et al. (1990) β = .82, F = 7.70 Carod-Artal et al. (2009)
Health (poorer) 0 Pucciarelli et al. (2018) Wan-Fei et al. (2017)
Stroke survivor anxiety (higher)
Atteih et al. (2015)Carod-Artal et al. (2009)
OR = 3.47r = 0.25
0
Support (less) 0 Smith et al. (2004)
Energy (less) Smith et al. (2004) β = -0.08 0
Gender 0 Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
Notes. NR refers to when the effect size was not reported and could not be calculated due to the information reported. Effect sizes were classified in terms of magnitude per Cohen (1988): ‘small’: d = 0.2 or r = 0.1, ‘medium’: d = 0.5 or r = 0.3 and ‘large’: d = 0.8 or r = 0.5.
Quality assessment has been used to help determine which factors to report on
in relation to anxiety (see Table 3). For example, if only two studies examined a
specific factor (e.g. socio-economic status of caregiver) and both studies were rated as
weak then this will not be discussed in-text due to likely biased results. Similarly, if
only one study studied a specific factor then this will not be discussed explicitly due
to the lack of reproducibility and possible reliability at this time. The quality
assessment has also been used to highlight areas of strength and suggested areas of
improvement in the field, both in relation to individual studies through this section
and the field as whole (see Discussion section).
Caregiver factors.
Demographic characteristics.
186
Four demographic factors of caregivers were consistently examined in relation
to caregiver anxiety: gender, age, unemployment and level of education. Where
appropriate, effect sizes will be judged in relation to the widely accepted
categorization of effect size by Cohen (1988); ‘small’: d = 0.2 or r = 0.1, ‘medium’: d
= 0.5 or r = 0.3 and ‘large’: d = 0.8 or r = 0.5 – see Appendix D for all reported effect
sizes.
Gender.
Five studies found an association of female gender and anxiety at different
time points post-stroke, with a small or medium effect size, where this could be
determined. Initially, Choi-Kwon et al. (2005) aimed to elucidate which factors
impact on caregiver burden at approximately 3 years post-stroke in a cross-sectional
study. Gender was found to significantly impact on anxiety experienced, with female
caregivers being more likely to be anxious. However, whilst Choi-Kwon et al. (2005)
randomly selected participants from a medical centre to participate, only 44% agreed
which suggests that the sample may be biased. By using a more robust design and a
higher uptake of participants (81% of those invited participated) in a prospective
longitudinal study, Wilz and Kalytta (2008) provided additional support that female
caregivers were more likely to be anxious at 3-months post-stroke (d = 0.44). Further
strength for this finding was afforded when being female was associated with higher
anxiety at 15-months post-stroke (d = 0.44), and the proportion of females in the
clinical range for anxiety was higher than in males at both time points. Again, Ozge et
al. (2009) replicated this finding such that at 6-months post-stroke female caregivers
were more likely to be anxious (medium effect size, d = 0.61); however, the exact
number of caregivers included in this analysis is unknown because drop-out rates
187
from the initial 198 caregivers were not reported. This means that the estimated effect
of gender could have less precision. Similarly, Carod-Artal et al. (2009) also found
that at 21-months post-stroke female caregivers experienced significantly higher
anxiety compared to male caregivers. Although all studies had a highly skewed ratio
of female to male caregivers participating, with this on average being 3:1, this is
similar to the ratio of female to male caregivers for this age group generally (57–81%
female, Sharma, Chakrabarti, & Grover, 2016).
Some research suggests anxiety may increase over time in women, but not in
men. Alexander and Wilz (2010) in their longitudinal study of caregivers, at 3-months
post-stroke women reported more anxiety but this difference was not statistically
significant after applying Bonferroni correction for multiple analyses conducted. Yet,
at 15-months post-stroke, female caregivers were found to experience significantly
higher anxiety compared to male caregivers (medium effect size, d = .67). What
further strengthens this finding is the minimal drop-out over the 1-year period (18%),
which suggests that the sample is less likely to be biased. Pucciarelli et al. (2018)
investigated 244 caregivers across five time points in the first year after stroke and
found gender was not a significant predictor of anxiety, however, this approached
significance (p = .066). Additionally, where no effect was found, drop-out rate was
high (45% over the 1-year period). Whilst gender did not significantly impact on who
was more likely to drop-out, those experiencing higher anxiety may have been more
likely to drop-out. Interestingly, the studies which found female caregivers were more
likely to experience higher anxiety measured anxiety on average later post-stroke
(mean = 17 months), compared with the studies which indicated no relationship
188
(mean = 6 months). Thus, anxiety may be more likely to increase in female caregivers
over time.
Age.
Caregiver age was consistently found unrelated to caregiver anxiety. For
example, Cumming, Cadilhac, Rubin, Crafti, and Pearce (2008) found that age of
caregiver did not predict anxiety at 3-years post-stroke in 116 caregivers in Australia.
A lack of relationship between age and anxiety was upheld across a range of ages,
across cultures and time since stroke (3-months–3-years post-stroke). Furthermore, all
studies were moderate or strong in quality rating, hence this finding seems to be
reliable and valid.
Unemployment.
Caregiver anxiety was shown to be associated with caregiver unemployment.
For example, Choi-Kwon et al. (2005) demonstrated that in 147 caregivers (40
months post-stroke) being unemployed was associated with higher anxiety. Similarly,
in 150 caregivers’ employment loss was found to be associated with higher anxiety
(ranging from 3 months–2 years post-stroke, Sreedharan et al., 2013). Yet, these
studies did not control for possible confounders, it is possible other variables may also
contribute to caregiver anxiety. For instance, burden levels such as financial burden,
may confound the relationship as higher burden can lead to more anxiety (Rigby et
al., 2009). Alternatively, Pucciarelli et al. (2018) found that when comparing
employed to retired caregivers (up to 12-months post-discharge from rehabilitation
hospital), neither type of employment status was more likely to predict anxiety. In the
above studies, unemployment/employment loss is likely to relate to loss of
189
employment at a working age. Thus, it is possible that economic demands may
increase over time as caregiving demands continue, and subsequently lead to an
increase in anxiety.
Anxiety over time.
Generally, caregiver anxiety reduced over time in longitudinal research and
there seemed to be a negative interaction between age of stroke survivor and caregiver
anxiety, such that being a caregiver of a younger stroke survivor could lead to anxiety
being less likely to reduce (see stroke survivor characteristics section) over time. Four
studies found an anxiety reduction between time points. Lui, Lee, Greenwood, and
Ross, (2012) found that caregiver anxiety measured using the HADS-A significantly
reduced from stroke survivor (mean age = 70 years) discharge to 3-months post-
discharge, although an effect size could not be calculated. Examining this relationship
in more detail over a longer period, Pucciarelli et al. (2018) reported anxiety
significantly decreased consistently over five time points (although an effect size
could not be calculated) across 1-year following discharge from rehabilitation
hospital, where the mean age of stroke survivors was initially 71 years old. Overall
the mean age of stroke survivors in studies where anxiety significantly reduced over
time was 67 years old. However, three studies reported no significant change in
caregiver anxiety between time points and where stroke survivors’ mean age was
reported the average of these was 60 years old. Interestingly, although no significant
relationship was found between time and anxiety, all anxiety scores reduced (see
Jaracz et al., 2015, mean age of stroke survivors = 61 years old). Therefore, a negative
interaction between age of stroke survivor and caregiver anxiety could be present,
which may be due to fears concerning whether younger caregivers believe they will
190
be able to cope with being a caregiver for potentially more years (Pierce, Steiner,
Govoni, Thompson, & Friedemann, 2007).
Well-being.
Four factors related to wellbeing were frequently examined in relation to
caregiver anxiety: burden, depression, quality of life / physical health and social
support, listed from the most to least studied.
All studies which investigated burden and anxiety found a significant
relationship whereby higher perceived caregiver burden was associated with higher
caregiver anxiety, and it was demonstrated to predict it. For example, in a cross-
sectional study of 200 caregivers, Carod-Artal et al. (2009) found a positive
relationship between caregiver burden and anxiety, with a large effect size (r = 0.61).
This finding was then shown to be reliable over time: Jaracz et al. (2015)
demonstrated that increased burden was associated with higher anxiety at 6-months
and 5-years post-stroke (OR = 6.82, large effect size, Chen, Cohen, & Chen, 2010).
This result indicates that the odds of experiencing considerable burden are six times
higher if clinical anxiety is present (scoring 11 or more on the HADS-A) and no other
factors were significant at both time points (e.g., time spent caregiving and sense of
coherence). Although high drop-out was reported (42%), all the research supports the
relationship between anxiety and burden and at different time points after stroke (after
3-months of caring to 5-years post-stroke). Dankner et al. (2016) extended Jaracz et
al.’s (2015) finding further by controlling for age and sex of caregivers, and found
caregiver anxiety was associated with caregiver burden.
191
Similarly, studies reliably found that more symptoms of depression was
related to higher anxiety in caregivers. This strong finding held across cultures
(Ireland, Hong Kong and USA), measures of anxiety with medium–large effect sizes
shown (HADS-A and the Symptom Questionnaire, OR = 5.07, r = 0.61–0.82,
respectively) and a large range of time post-stroke (6-months–6 years).
Poorer caregiver health was overall found related to anxiety, although studies
were of poor quality. Health was rated by caregivers on a subjective unvalidated 3-
point scale (Choi-Kwon et al., 2005), the presence of common physical symptoms
(e.g. hypertension, Williams, 1993), or through measures of quality of life. Quality of
life was rated in relation to physical and mental functioning (Smith et al., 2004) or
solely mental functioning (Wan-Fei et al., 2017). However, Wan-Fei et al. (2017) also
found that caregivers’ quality of life in relation to their physical function did not
impact on their anxiety. This finding may be less reliable compared to Smith et al.’s
(2004) finding due to the smaller sample size (30 vs. 90) and no discussion of the
required sample size for adequate power. Studies examining this relationship
commonly did not explore if this changed over time or controlled for other factors
which may be relevant, such as burden or gender due to the common associations
found between these factors and caregiver anxiety. Thus, there could be interactions
which have not yet been explored, whereby if caregivers experience significant
burden and poor health concurrently this may increase their anxiety twofold, and if
female caregivers experience poor health then they may also be considerably more
likely to experience significant anxiety. Stroke survivor characteristics.
Research on stroke survivor characteristics in relation to caregiver anxiety has
mostly focused on the physical functioning level and cognitive impairment of stroke
192
survivors, their wellbeing (measured by anxiety and depression symptoms), and age.
Other demographic factors, the impact of time and quality of life and health were less
extensively researched in relation to stroke survivors and caregiver anxiety.
Therefore, these will not be discussed in-text but findings related to these are shown
in Table 5.
Functioning.
Functioning has been examined in relation to the physical functioning status
and the estimated level of cognitive impairment of stroke survivors. Physical
functioning of stroke survivors was the most studied stroke survivor characteristic in
relation to caregiver anxiety (n = 8).
In the majority, no relationship was found between stroke survivor physical
functioning and caregiver anxiety, although there were some contradictory findings.
The discrepancy could be explained by the severity of physical function dependency.
Intriguingly, in the three studies which found a relationship between physical function
and caregiver anxiety, the stroke survivors were rated as more independent compared
with studies which found no relationship (average Barthel Index scores of 64 vs. 41).
Therefore, whilst generally there does not seem to be a consistent relationship
between stroke survivor physical functioning and caregiver anxiety, if stroke
survivors are more independent this could mean their caregivers are more likely to
experience anxiety because stroke survivors may lack insight and this has been
associated with increased caregiver distress (Dockree, Tarleton, Carton, & Fitzgerald,
2015). For example, whilst stroke survivors may be independent with physical tasks,
caregivers may worry that survivors could put themselves in danger due to awareness
193
difficulties, such as not perceiving possible dangers when crossing roads (Barnsley,
McCluskey, Middleton, 2011).
Worse cognitive function in survivors was generally associated with higher
caregiver anxiety. All four studies investigating this found poorer cognitive function
was related to higher levels of caregiver anxiety with small–medium effect sizes. This
was shown across different measures of cognitive functioning. Although the measures
of cognitive function used were brief (Hoops et al., 2009), they provide a first insight
into the relationship between cognitive functioning and caregiver anxiety. For
instance, most recently Atteih et al. (2015) demonstrated that caregivers of stroke
survivors who scored in the cognitive impairment range on the Montreal Cognitive
Assessment were 2.35 times more likely to score in the clinical range for anxiety
compared to caregivers of stroke survivors who were not cognitively impaired.
There could also be an interaction between gender and time since stroke. For
example, based on socialisation, female caregivers could be better able to adjust to
emotional changes in stroke survivors when these are measured with cognitive
changes. Thus, female caregivers could be less impacted by impairment in this
domain, whereas male caregivers may take more time to adjust to emotional changes.
For example, when Alexander and Wilz (2010) examined the relationship between
caregiver anxiety and stroke survivor cognitive function more closely, they showed
that there was only a significant relationship found for male caregivers 3-months post-
discharge. Therefore, at 3-months post-discharge the cognitive function of stroke
survivors did not impact on female caregivers’ anxiety, nor was there an impact for
either gender at 15-months post-discharge. This difference in result between Atteih et
al. (2015) and Alexander and Wilz (2010) could be due to the incorporation of
194
emotional adjustment in the Patient Competency Rating Scale, as well as cognitive
functioning, as opposed to solely measuring cognitive functioning as in the Montreal
Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination. Additionally, female
caregivers could be able to adjust to emotional changes in stroke survivors faster than
male caregivers. To summarise, poorer cognitive functioning of stroke survivors is
related to caregiver anxiety, but this relationship could be impacted on by emotional
changes in the stroke survivors, which may initially lead to increased anxiety in male
caregivers as they may take longer to adjust to these changes.
Well-being.
Stroke survivors’ wellbeing was consistently assessed in terms of the
association between depression and caregiver anxiety. Generally, evidence was
provided that stroke survivor depression was related to caregiver anxiety. Three
studies demonstrated a significant relationship, whereby the more symptoms of
depression the survivor reported, the higher their caregivers’ anxiety with medium–
large effect sizes found. One study did not find a relationship, but this is likely related
to the measures used. All studies which reported significant results used the HADS-A
to measure caregiver anxiety, whereas Wilz and Kalytta (2008) used the BAI. The
BAI has more of a focus on physiological/somatic symptoms compared to the HADS-
A (Fydrich et al., 1992; Muntingh et al., 2011). It could be that the symptoms of
depression exhibited by stroke survivors may more generally impact on caregiver
anxiety (Hirschfield, 2001), rather than their somatic anxiety symptoms focused on
more so by the BAI (Julian, 2011), hence the non-significant result found by Wilz and
Kalytta (2008).
195
More consistently, both Atteih et al. (2015) and Carod-Artal et al. (2009)
found significant relationships between stroke survivor anxiety and caregiver anxiety,
with medium effect sizes. They showed that caregivers of stroke survivors with higher
anxiety were more likely to experience higher anxiety themselves. It is unclear what
direction this occurs in, e.g., whether stroke survivor anxiety increases caregiver
anxiety or vice versa. Longitudinal research would be beneficial to elucidate this.
Demographic characteristics.
Age of stroke survivor was the only demographic factor investigated
consistently in relation to caregiver anxiety: Mei, Wilson, Lin, Li, and Zhang (2018)
and Pucciarelli et al. (2018) found a considerable relationship between caregivers of
younger stroke survivors being significantly more anxious. In these studies, on
average stroke survivors were older (mean ages: 66.3 and 71 years old) than the
caregivers (mean ages: 50.4 and 53 years old). Pucciarelli et al. (2018) suggested that
caregivers of younger stroke survivors could be more anxious because of a higher
expectation that survivors will recover to their pre-stroke condition, which may then
not occur. Although, as with many of the studies discussed, Mei et al. (2018) did not
control for other possible confounders. Pucciarelli et al. (2018) rectified this by using
a linear mixed-effects model to test the aforementioned hypothesis and included
factors such as time since stroke in the model, which is important to include because
as has been discussed generally caregiver anxiety has been shown to reduce over time.
The authors also had specified the required sample size prior to recruitment for
adequate power (N = 200) which was actualised. As such, the finding that younger
stroke survivors are more likely to have anxious caregivers is likely to be reliable.
196
Discussion
The presented evidence suggests that a significant proportion of caregivers of
community-dwelling stroke survivors experience considerable anxiety, which is in-
line with the stroke caregiver literature concerning burden and depression. In terms of
caregiver factors, most consistently, experiencing high levels of burden and
depressive symptoms were related to caregiver anxiety. Generally, but researched by
fewer studies, poorer health and unemployment/employment loss were also shown to
be correlated with increased anxiety. Caregivers of stroke survivors with more
cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms were generally more likely to be
anxious. Similarly, although studied to a lesser extent, caregivers of younger stroke
survivors and anxious stroke survivors had substantially higher anxiety levels. Whilst
not as often found to be statistically significant, general trends suggested that female
caregivers were more likely to be anxious and overall that caregiver anxiety is likely
to reduce over time. Caregiver age and stroke survivor physical functioning level
were commonly indicated not to be related to caregiver anxiety, although when stroke
survivors were more independent this seemed to suggest an increased likelihood of
caregivers experiencing anxiety.
Given the increasing need to target intervention towards specific groups due to
funding cuts, these results suggest that principally intervention should be targeted
towards caregivers of stroke survivors who are experiencing burden and depressive
symptoms, and those who help support stroke survivors with cognitive impairment
and depressive symptoms. Worryingly high levels of anxiety were also shown in
studies which assessed anxiety many months and years post-stroke, which suggest
intervention is required. The findings also point toward a pressing need for the care of
197
stroke survivors to move toward a joint intervention approach so that long-term
outcomes can be improved (Rigby et al. 2009). Although a causal relationship has not
been clarified, there were clear links between caregiver and stroke survivor wellbeing.
Identification and assessment of caregiver anxiety could be achieved through the
completion of the HADS-A soon after the occurrence of the stroke as, across the
studies, levels of anxiety seemed to be higher earlier post-stroke. The HADS-A is also
short and easy to administer, and thus would allow for simple, early possible
identification of need so that appropriate interventions could be implemented. Initially
intervention could comprise of evidence-based psychological approaches
recommended for anxiety, such as psychoeducation about anxiety and self-help
approaches in the first instance which could then be stepped up as required (National
Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2014). Stepped up approaches could
comprise of cognitive behavioural therapy or applied relaxation due to the evidence of
effectiveness in reducing anxiety (National Institute for Health and Clinical
Excellence, 2011).
Caregivers of stroke survivors with cognitive impairment were more likely to
be anxious, whereas caregiver anxiety was not consistently found to correlate with
stroke survivors’ physical functioning ability. This could be explained by the usual
support provided after stroke. More of an emphasis on teaching caregivers general
knowledge about stroke is present, rather than on providing more specific support in
relation to helping support stroke survivors with cognitive impairment (Reeves et al.,
2017; Visser-Meily et al., 2005). Furthermore, there can also be more of a focus on
teaching caregivers about how to support stroke survivors physically, rather than
cognitively and emotionally (Camak, 2015). Findings from a Cochrane review have
198
shown that this information provision does not significantly help caregiver mood
(Forster et al, 2012). Additionally, it could be more difficult for caregivers to adjust to
cognitive changes. For instance, Alexander and Wilz (2010) explain this result
through suggesting that disease-related mental impairments and possible personality
changes (e.g. the caregiver seeming like a stranger) can burden the relationship
between caregiver and stroke survivor. Similarly, this increased difficulty for
caregivers to adjust to cognitive change compared to physical limitations has been
supported in the traumatic brain injury literature (Khan, Baguley, & Cameron, 2003;
Marsh, Kersel, Havill, & Sleigh, 2002).
However, there needs to be more consistency in measurement between studies
of stroke survivor cognitive and physical impairments to be able to add support to or
evidence against these findings, as in the four studies which examined cognitive
function in relation to caregiver anxiety three different measures were used. To tease
apart the differences between the impact of cognitive and physical impairment on
caregiver mood, the same measures need to be used in studies when examining this,
such as continuing to consistently measure stroke survivor physical functioning using
the Barthel Index. Moreover, future research examining the relationship between
cognitive function, physical functioning and caregiver anxiety could utilise the
Montreal Cognitive Assessment to measure cognitive function. This is due to its
established validity in stroke survivors and high level of specificity (0.92), which is
important as a cognitive screening tool, (Cumming, Churilov, Linden, & Bernhardt,
2013; Dong et al., 2010) and because it is free to use and takes approximately 10
minutes to administer.
Methodological Critique
199
There were a reasonable number of longitudinal studies included (8/21), and now
more emphasis needs to be placed on which factors influence the change in anxiety
over time. Previously the paucity of longitudinal studies in this area was noted as a
problem, as an understanding of how caregiver outcomes may change over time could
not be elucidated (Greenwood et al., 2008; Rigby et al., 2009). However, the number
of longitudinal studies included allowed for the exploration of how caregivers’
anxiety changes over time, which is important given that caregiving is a dynamic
process. The age of stroke survivors may also be relevant as it seemed that caregivers
of younger stroke survivors were more likely to be anxious, and, for this group of
caregivers, anxiety did not appear to significantly reduce over time (Alexander &
Wilz, 2010; Greenwood & Mackenzie, 2010; Jaracz et al., 2015). It would be helpful
if studies measured anxiety consistently, such as using the HADS-A, to facilitate
comparing factors over time in a more reliable manner. For example, as anxiety seems
to be higher in caregivers of younger stroke survivors, research could explore whether
anxiety in younger caregivers could be less likely to reduce over time. The HADS is
also useful because it allows for the measurement of anxiety and depression in both
caregivers and stroke survivors, which is important given the high co-occurrence of
these experiences (Atteih et al., 2015; Smith et al., 2004). Furthermore, as the
majority of studies included involved dyads within 2-years post-stroke, follow-up
studies could assess the impact of stroke over longer durations. Caregivers may need
to fulfil this role for many years, and the occurrence of certain factors (e.g., burden,
depression, being a female caregiver) may increase the potential for a cumulative
negative impact (Macnamara et al., 1990).
Restricted Information Gathered
200
There was a wide variety of variables considered, of which many were not
consistently assessed in relation to caregiver anxiety. Therefore, it was difficult to
discern which factors are most likely to result in caregiver anxiety. Although this is
likely influenced by some of the studies’ main aims not being specific to anxiety,
rather focusing on the effect of caregiving more generally on psychological well-
being or specifically in relation to burden. Whilst the majority of studies (17/21)
considered the impact of caregiver and survivor factors together on anxiety, the most
commonly and dyadically examined variables were demographics of caregivers and
survivors. Thus, other factors which may have a salient influence on caregiver anxiety
have not been consistently assessed.
Other factors which could assert substantial influence on caregiver anxiety
include caregivers’ physical health, caregivers’ employment loss post-stroke, level of
social support, number of hours’ caregiving and whether caregivers are accessing
support from services. These factors are suggested based on literature previously
discussed (Jaracz et al., 2015; Kalra et al., 2004; Rigby et al., 2009), but were scarcely
examined in relation to anxiety in the included studies (e.g. only six studies reported
on service usage post-discharge from rehabilitation centres). Moreover, about half of
the studies did not specify whether survivors were included who had survived more
than one stroke (n = 12). However, it would seem logical that caregivers of people
who have had more than one stroke could experience increased anxiety because the
chances of having an additional stroke increase with each stroke experienced (Furie et
al., 2010). Future research should seek to explore the impact of these additional
factors on caregiver anxiety.
Inconsistency and Unclear Reporting
201
Studies usually failed to describe the nuances of the situation which may
impact on anxiety. For instance, evidence suggests that living apart from the person
being cared for helps to protect against caregivers experiencing distress (Brodaty &
Donkin, 2010; Cherry et al., 2013). Moreover, approximately half of the studies (n =
11) did not record a clear definition of ‘caregiver’, which means that where the
caregiver lives is unknown and it is therefore difficult to afford replicability. This
diversity is likely to impact on the support caregivers may require, their ways of
coping and levels of anxiety (Greenwood et al., 2008). Studies should seek to provide
definitions of caregivers in their publications to allow more informed conclusions to
be made and to enable the replication of research.
In many of the excluded studies, it was unclear where the stroke survivor was
at the time of the research and how long post-stroke the research was conducted. For
example, it was difficult to discern whether the stroke survivor was in inpatient
rehabilitation, a general hospital setting or in the community. The demands for
caregiving can be extremely different dependent on this factor, with the demands
usually being higher when the stroke survivor has recently returned to live in the
community (Hankey, 2004). Furthermore, approximately one third of studies
measured caregiver anxiety at the point of stroke survivor discharge from inpatient
services, but did not report the mean time since stroke (n = 7). This makes it
challenging to ascertain the impact time may have post-stroke or the amount of
service input received, and how these may relate to caregiver anxiety. More clarity
around these factors should be provided in the future as this may allow more
consistent relationships with caregiver anxiety to be revealed.
Studies were conducted across fourteen countries, but the possible impact of
202
culture on caregiver anxiety is somewhat unknown. Whilst this indicates that
caregiver anxiety seems to be high irrespective of culture/country, and often the
individual studies compared and explained their results sensitively in relation to
results found in other cultures (e.g. Mei et al., 2018), there could be specific cultural
influences which may impact on caregiver anxiety that have not been researched in
more detail within particular cultures. To provide a positive example, Sreedharan et
al. (2013) suggested that they found lower levels of caregiver anxiety due to Indians
typically receiving more help from family systems following stroke, rather than
caregiving responsibilities falling predominantly on one relative. Clearly, findings
need replication within cultures to provide more support for variables found
associated with caregiver anxiety.
Statistical Considerations
The majority of studies (n = 14) used univariate analyses to assess whether
factors were associated with and/or related to anxiety, therefore considering the
interdependency of variables was not achieved. Based on the current findings, this
could pose a problem if intervention is targeted towards one specific group as it may
not work if there is another factor contributing to anxiety which has not been
considered (Rigby et al., 2009). Thus, future studies need to control for the
contribution of other variables (e.g. caregiver depression) when assessing caregiver
anxiety to examine this more validly (Greenwood et al., 2008). However, when
assessing numerous factors sample size must be considered as, to have adequate
power, these analyses require more participants (Field, 2013). Furthermore, a priori
power calculations should be reported as per Lui et al. (2012) to allow for appropriate
sample sizes to be obtained relevant to the proposed analyses. Post-hoc power
203
analyses should also be employed to analyse results to ensure that the results can be
validly judged (Greenwood et al., 2008). Likewise, more salient detail in studies
should be provided to allow for effect sizes to be calculated, as often the standard
deviation of the mean differences or the mean anxiety for specific groups were not
reported.
Selection and Publication Bias
Minimal assessment of whether levels of anxiety influenced drop-outs
occurred, although some evidence suggests that older age is related to increased
chance of drop-out. Only half of the longitudinal studies analysed differences between
responders and dropouts. This limits the extent to which possible systematic
differences between these two groups and the impact this may have on anxiety can be
assessed. Illustrating this, Jaracz et al. (2015) found that drop-outs were significantly
more likely to be caregivers of older stroke survivors, not be spouses and be
caregivers of survivors with lower physical function. Pucciarelli et al. (2018) provided
some support for this in that the only statistical difference between those who
completed the study and those who did not, was that the completers were slightly
older (caregiver mean age: 54 vs. 51 years old). Thus, older caregivers or caregivers
of older stroke survivors may be more likely to drop-out of or participate in research,
and as such the results could be biased towards younger caregivers and stroke
survivors. Therefore, studies should ensure non-response rates are recorded and
possible differences analysed between groups, as it is important to ascertain whether
certain groups of participants (e.g. older caregivers) were more likely to drop out as
this group could be the most in need of intervention.
How much publication bias impacted upon the current review is unknown. No
204
studies were found which reported null effects across all variables, which could mean
the results are biased. However, non-significant findings were reported within studies,
and so this is unlikely to be a major limitation (Rigby et al., 2009).
Conclusions
Findings suggest that a substantial number of caregivers experience significant
anxiety post-stroke. Most consistently, caregivers experiencing high levels of burden
and depressive symptoms were related to caregiver anxiety. Caregivers of stroke
survivors with more cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms were in the
majority significantly more likely to be anxious. Recommendations for future
research in terms of using more consistent measures, further work investigating
factors which few studies examined, and more detailed reporting in articles
concerning anxiety have been made. Early detection of anxiety has been
recommended and intervention targeted towards these caregivers should be achieved
to increase the likelihood of better outcomes for both caregivers and stroke survivors.
205
References
Adamson, J., Beswick, A., & Ebrahim, S. (2004). Is stroke the most common cause of
disability? Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 13(4), 171–177.
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.06.003
Alexander, T., & Wilz, G. (2010). Family caregivers: Gender differences in
adjustment to stroke survivors' mental changes. Rehabilitation
Psychology, 55(2), 159–169. doi:10.1037/a0019253
Anderson C., Linto, J., & Stewartwynne, E. (1995). A population-based assessment of
the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke
survivors. Stroke, 26(5), 843–849.
Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C., Hagen, N., Biondo, P., & Cummings, G. (2010).
Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the
Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health
Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: Methodological research. Journal
of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 12–18.
Atteih, S., Mellon, L., Hall, P., Brewer, L., Horgan, F., Williams, D., & Hickey, A.
(2015). Implications of stroke for caregiver outcomes: Findings from the
ASPIRE-S study. International Journal of Stroke, 10(6), 918–923.
doi:10.1111/ijs.12535
Aylard, P., Gooding, J., McKenna, P., & Snaith, R. (1987). A validation study of three
anxiety and depression self-assessment scales. Journal of Psychosomatic
Research, 31(2), 261–268.
206
Barnsley, L., McCluskey, A., & Middleton, S. (2011). What people say about
travelling outdoors after their stroke? A qualitative study. Australian
Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(1), 71–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-
1630.2011.00935.x
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for
measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. Journal
of Psychosomatic Research, 52(2), 69–77. doi:10.1016/S0022-
3999(01)00296-3
Brodaty, H., & Donkin, M. (2010). Family carers of people with dementia. In D.
Ames, A. Burns & J. O’Brien (4th ed.), Dementia (pp. 137–152). Boca Raton,
FL: CRC Press.
Camak, D. (2015). Addressing the burden of stroke caregivers: A literature
review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(17–18), 2376-2382. doi:
10.1111/jocn.12884
Carod-Artal, F., Coral, L. F., Trizotto, D. S., & Moreira, C. M. (2009). Burden and
perceived health status among caregivers of stroke patients. Cerebrovascular
Diseases, 28(5), 472–480. doi:10.1159/000236525
207
Chang, V., Hwang, S., & Kasimis, B. (2002). Longitudinal documentation of cancer
pain management outcomes. Journal of Pain and Symptom
Management, 24(5), 494–505. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00516-x
Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen, S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the
magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in
Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860–864. doi:
10.1080/03610911003650383
Cherry, M., Salmon, P., Dickson, J., Powell, D., Sikdar, S., & Ablett, J. (2013).
Factors influencing the resilience of carers of individuals with dementia.
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 23(04), 251–266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0959259813000130
Choi-Kwon, S., Kim, H., Kwon, S. U., & Kim, J. S. (2005). Factors affecting the
burden on caregivers of stroke survivors in South Korea. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(5), 1043–1048.
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.013
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Crowe, M., & Sheppard, L. (2011). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack
rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed. Journal of Clinical
Epidemiology, 64(1), 79–89.
208
Cumming, T. B., Cadilhac, D. A., Rubin, G., Crafti, N., & Pearce, D. C. (2008).
Psychological distress and social support in informal caregivers of stroke
survivors. Brain Impairment, 9(2), 152–169. doi:10.1375/brim.9.2.152
Cumming, T., Churilov, L., Linden, T., & Bernhardt, J. (2013). Montreal Cognitive
Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination are both valid cognitive tools
in stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 128(2), 122–129. doi:
10.1111/ane.12084
Dankner, R., Bachner, Y. G., Ginsberg, G., Ziv, A., Ben David, H., Litmanovitch-
Goldstein, D, ... Greenberg, D. (2016). Correlates of well-being among
caregivers of long-term community-dwelling stroke survivors. International
Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 39(4), 326–330.
doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000192
Dobkin, B. (2014). Rehabilitation after stroke. New England Journal of Medicine,
352(16), 1677–1684.
Dockree, P., Tarleton, Y., Carton, S., & Fitzgerald, M. (2015). Connecting self-
awareness and error-awareness in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal
of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21(07), 473–482. doi:
10.1017/s1355617715000594
Dong, Y., Sharma, V., Chan, B., Venketasubramanian, N., Teoh, H., Seet, R, …
Chen, C. (2010). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is superior to
the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of vascular
cognitive impairment after acute stroke. Journal of the Neurological
Sciences, 299(1-2), 15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.051
209
Enns, M., Cox, B., Parker, J., & Guertin, J. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of
the Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories in patients with major
depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 47(1–3), 195–200. doi:
10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00103-1
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics IBM statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). London,
England: SAGE.
Forster, A., Brown, L., Smith, J., House, A., Knapp, P., Wright, J., & Young, J.
(2012). Information provision for stroke patients and their
caregivers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:
10.1002/14651858.cd001919.pub3
Furie, K., Kasner, S., Adams, R., Albers, G., Bush, R., Fagan, S, … Wentworth, D.
(2010). Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or
transient ischemic attack. Stroke, 42, 227–276.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e3181f7d043
Fydrich, T., Dowdall, D., & Chambless, D. (1992). Reliability and validity of the
Beck Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6(1), 55–61. doi:
10.1016/0887-6185(92)90026-410.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008
Glass, T., Matchar, D., Belyea, M., & Feussner, J. (1993). Impact of social support on
outcome in first stroke. Stroke, 24(1), 64–70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.str.24.1.64
210
Greenwood, N., & Mackenzie, A. (2010). An exploratory study of anxiety in carers of
stroke survivors. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(13–14), 2032–2038.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03163.x
Greenwood, N., Mackenzie, A., Cloud, G., & Wilson, N. (2008). Informal carers of
stroke survivors’ factors influencing carers: A systematic review of
quantitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(18), 1329–1349.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280701602178
Haley, W., Roth, D., Hovater, M., & Clay, O. (2015). Long-term impact of stroke on
family caregiver well-being: A population-based case-control
study. Neurology, 84(13), 1323–1329. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001418
Haley, W., Roth, D., Howard, G., & Safford, M. (2010). Caregiving strain and
estimated risk for stroke and coronary heart disease among spouse caregivers:
Differential effects by race and sex. Stroke, 41(2), 331–336.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.109.568279
Han, B., & Haley, W. E. (1999). Family caregiving for patients with stroke: Review
and analysis. Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 30(7), 1478–1485.
doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1478
Hankey, G. (2004). Informal care giving for disabled stroke
survivors. BMJ, 328(7448), 1085–1086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1085
Higgins, J., & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of
interventions. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
211
Hirschfield, R. (2001). The comorbidity of major depression and anxiety
disorders. The Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical
Psychiatry, 3(06), 244–254. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v03n0609
Hoops, S., Nazem, S., Siderowf, A., Duda, J., Xie, S., Stern, M., & Weintraub, D.
(2009). Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and
dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology, 73(21), 1738–1745. doi:
10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181c34b47
Jaracz, K., Grabowska-Fudala, B., Górna, K., Jaracz, J., Moczko, J., & Kozubski, W.
(2015). Burden in caregivers of long-term stroke survivors: Prevalence and
determinants at 6 months and 5 years after stroke. Patient Education and
Counselling, 98(8), 1011–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.008
Jaracz, K., Grabowska-Fudala, B., Górna, K., & Kozubski, W. (2014). Caregiving
burden and its determinants in Polish caregivers of stroke survivors. Archives
of Medical Science, 5, 941–950. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2014.46214
Julian, L. (2011). Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck
Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety
(HADS-A). Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), S467–S472. doi:
10.1002/acr.20561
Kalra, L., Evans, A., Perez, I., Melbourn, A., Patel, A., Knapp, M., & Donaldson, N.
(2004). Training carers of stroke patients: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ,
328(7448), 1099. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1099
212
Katrak, P., Bialocerkowski, A., Massy-Westropp, N., Kumar, V., & Grimmer, K.
(2004). A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC
Medical Research Methodology, 4(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-22
Kellner, R. (1983). Manual of the Symptom Questionnaire. Albuquerque, NM:
University of New Mexico Department of Psychiatry.
Kellner, R., & Sheffield, BF. (1973). A self-rating scale of distress. Psychological
Medicine, 3, 88–100.
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Koretz, D., Merikangas, K. R, ...
Wang, P. S. (2003). The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: Results
from the national comorbidity survey replication (NCS-R). JAMA, 289(23),
3095–3105. doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3095
Khan, F., Baguley, I., & Cameron, I. (2003). 4: Rehabilitation after traumatic brain
injury. The Medical Journal of Australia. 178(6), 290–295.
Lau, C., Tang, W., Wong, K., Mok, V., & Ungvari, G. (2012). Predictors of the
depressive symptomatology of the family caregivers of Chinese stroke patients
in Hong Kong. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 19(4), 285–
293. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01782.x
Lilienfeld, S. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 2(1), 53–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00029.x
Lui, M. H., Lee, D. T. F., Greenwood, N., & Ross, F. M. (2012). Informal stroke
caregivers' self-appraised problem-solving abilities as a predictor of well-
213
being and perceived social support. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(1–2),
232–242. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03742.x
Macnamara, S. E., Gummow, L. J., Goka, R., & Gregg, C. H. (1990). Caregiver
strain: Need for late post-stroke intervention. Rehabilitation
Psychology, 35(2), 71–78. doi:10.1037/h0079051
Marsh, N., Kersel, D., Havill, J., & Sleigh, J. (2002). Caregiver burden during the
year following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and
Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(4), 434–447.
McHugh, M. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica,
22(3), 276–282.
McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1971). Manual for the Profile of
Mood States. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
Mei, Y., Wilson, S., Lin, B., Li, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Benefit finding for Chinese
family caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors: A cross-sectional
study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(7–8), e1419–e1428. doi:
10.1111/jocn.14249
Muntingh, A., van der Feltz-Cornelis, C., van Marwijk, H., Spinhoven, P., Penninx,
B., & van Balkom, A. (2011). Is the Beck Anxiety Inventory a good tool to
assess the severity of anxiety? A primary care study in The Netherlands study
of depression and anxiety (NESDA). BMC Family Practice, 12(1). doi:
10.1186/1471-2296-12-66
214
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014). Anxiety disorders: Quality
standard [QS53]. Retrieved March 25, 2019, from:
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs53/documents/new-nice-quality-standard-
aims-to-improve-recognition-assessment-and-availability-of-treatments-for-
anxiety-disorders
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2011). Generalised anxiety
disorder and panic disorder in adults: Management. Retrieved March 25,
2019, from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg113/resources/generalised-
anxiety-disorder-and-panic-disorder-in-adults-management-pdf-
35109387756997
Oddy, M. & da Silva Ramos, S. (2013). The clinical and cost-benefits of investing in
neurobehavioural rehabilitation: A multi-centre study. Brain Injury, 27(13–
14), 1500–1507. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.830332
Olai, L., Borgquist, L., & Svardsudd, K. (2015). Life situations and the care burden
for stroke patients and their informal caregivers in a prospective cohort
study. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 120(4), 290–298.
doi:10.3109/03009734.2015.1049388
Ostwald, S., Bernal, M., Cron, S., & Godwin, K. (2009). Stress experienced by stroke
survivors and spousal caregivers during the first year after discharge from
inpatient rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 16(2), 93–104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1602-93
215
Ozge, A., Ince, B., Somay, G., Cakmak, S. E., Uluduz, D., Bulkan, M, ... Kaleagasi,
H. (2009). The caregiver burden and stroke prognosis. Journal of
Neurological Sciences-Turkish, 26(2), 139–152.
Pandian, J., Gandhi, D., Lindley, R., & Bettger, J. (2016). Informal caregiving. Stroke,
47(12), 3057–3062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.116.013701
Perkins, M., Howard, V., Wadley, V., Crowe, M., Safford, M., & Haley, W, … Roth,
D. (2013). Caregiving strain and all-cause mortality: Evidence from the
REGARDS study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological
Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(4), 504–512.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs084
Pierce, L., Steiner, V., Govoni, A., Thompson, T., & Friedemann, M. (2007). Two
sides to the caregiving story. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14(2), 13–20.
doi: 10.1310/tsr1402-13
Portney L., & Watkins, P. (2007). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to
practice. London, England: Pearson.
Pucciarelli, G., Ausili, D., Galbussera, A. A., Rebora, P., Savini, S., Simeone, S, ...
Vellone, E. (2018). Quality of life, anxiety, depression and burden among
stroke caregivers: A longitudinal, observational multicentre study. Journal of
Advanced Nursing, 74(8), 1875–1887. doi:10.1111/jan.13695
Quigley, J., Thompson, J., Halfpenny, N., & Scott, D. (2018). Critical appraisal of
nonrandomized studies - A review of recommended and commonly used
tools. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 27. doi: 10.1111/jep.12889
216
Reeves, M., Hughes, A., Woodward, A., Freddolino, P., Coursaris, C., & Swierenga,
S, … Fritz, M. (2017). Improving transitions in acute stroke patients
discharged to home: The Michigan stroke transitions trial (MISTT)
protocol. BMC Neurology, 17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0895-1
Rigby, H., Gubitz, G., & Phillips, S. (2009). A systematic review of caregiver burden
following stroke. International Journal of Stroke, 4(4), 285–292.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00289.x
Sharma, N., Chakrabarti, S., & Grover, S. (2016). Gender differences in caregiving
among family - caregivers of people with mental illnesses. World Journal of
Psychiatry, 6(1), 7. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.7
Simon, C. & Kumar, S. (2002). Stroke patients’ carers’ views of formal community
support. British Journal of Community Nursing, 7(3), 158–163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2002.7.3.10216
Smith, L. N., Norrie, J., Kerr, S. M., Lawrence, I. M., Langhorne, P., & Lees, K. R.
(2004). Impact and influences on caregiver outcomes at one year post-
stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 18(2), 145–153. doi:10.1159/000079268
Snaith, R., Constantopoulos, A., Jardine, M., & McGuffin, P. (1978). A clinical scale
for the self-assessment of irritability. The British Journal of Psychiatry,
132(2), 164–171. doi: 10.1192/bjp.132.2.164
Sreedharan, S., Unnikrishnan, J., Amal, M., Shibi, B., Sarma, S., & Sylaja, P. (2013).
Employment status, social function decline and caregiver burden among stroke
217
survivors. A South Indian study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 332(1–
2), 97–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.06.026
Statistics Solutions. (2018). Profile of Mood States (POMS). Retrieved March 27,
2019, from https://www.statisticssolutions.com/profile-of-mood-states-poms/
Stroke Association. (2017). State of the nation: Stroke statistics. Retrieved March 25,
2019, from
https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/state_of_the_nation_2017_final_1
Stroke Association. (2018). State of the nation: Stroke statistics. Retrieved March 25,
2019, from https://www.stroke.org.uk/system/files/sotn_2018.pdf
Thomas, B., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., & Micucci, S. (2004). A process for
systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for
public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nursing,
1(3), 176–184.
Thompson, H., & Ryan, A. (2009). The impact of stroke consequences on spousal
relationships from the perspective of the person with stroke. Journal of
Clinical Nursing, 18(12), 1803–1811. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02694.x
Tsai, P. (2003). A middle-range theory of caregiver stress. Nursing Science
Quarterly, 16(2), 137–145. doi: 10.1177/0894318403251789
van Exel, N., op Reimer, W., Brouwer, W., van den Berg, B., Koopmanschap, M., &
van den Bos, G. (2004). Instruments for assessing the burden of informal
caregiving for stroke patients in clinical practice: A comparison of CSI, CRA,
218
SCQ and self-rated burden. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(2), 203–214.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr723oa
Visser-Meily, A., van Heugten, C., Post, M., Schepers, V., & Lindeman, E. (2005).
Intervention studies for caregivers of stroke survivors: A critical review.
Patient Education and Counselling, 56(3), 257–267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.013
Wan-Fei, K., Syed Hassan, S., Munn Sann, L., Fadhilah Ismail, S., Abdul Raman, R.,
& Ibrahim, F. (2017). Depression, anxiety and quality of life in stroke
survivors and their family caregivers: A pilot study using an actor/partner
interdependence model. Electronic Physician, 9(8), 4924–4933. doi:
10.19082/4924
Williams, A. M. (1993). Caregivers of persons with stroke - their physical and
emotional well-being. Quality of Life Research, 2(3), 213–220.
doi:10.1007/BF0043522
Wilz, G., & Kalytta, T. (2008). Anxiety symptoms in spouses of stroke
patients. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 25(4), 311–315. doi:10.1159/000118375
Zhou, Y., Cao, Z., Yang, M., Xi, X., Guo, Y., Fang, M, ... Du, Y. (2017). Comorbid
generalized anxiety disorder and its association with quality of life in patients
with major depressive disorder. Scientific Reports, 7 doi:10.1038/srep40511
Zigmond, A., & Snaith, R. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta
Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.
219
List of Appendices to the Literature Review
Appendix A - Author guidelines for chosen journal (removed)
Appendix B - Search Terms Utilised in Databases
Appendix C - Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies – the Effective Public
Health Practice Tool (EPHPP) (removed)
Appendix D – Statistical Analyses in Included Papers Summary
220
Appendices to the Literature Review
Appendix A – Author guidelines for chosen journal (removed)
221
Appendix B – Search Terms Utilised in Databases
Databases Search terms
Medline TX (TX ( stroke or cerebrovascular accident or cva ) AND TX ( carer or care-giver or caregiver or family member or relative or informal care* or spouse ) AND TX ( anx*
OR anx* AND depress* )
Narrow by Language: - English
Narrow by Source Types: - Academic Journals
PsycINFO TX ( stroke or cerebrovascular accident or cva ) AND TX ( carer or care-giver or caregiver or family member or relative or informal care* or spouse ) AND TX ( anx*
OR anx* AND depress* )
Narrow by Language: - English
Narrow by Source Types: - Academic Journals
Scopus ALL ( stroke OR cerebrovascular AND accident OR cva
AND carer OR care-giver OR caregiver OR family AND member OR relative OR informal AND care* OR spouse
AND anx* OR anx* AND depress* )
AND ( LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE , "ar" ) ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( LANGUAGE , "English" ) )
Web of Science
TOPIC: (stroke OR cerebrovascular accident OR cva) AND TOPIC: (carer or care-giver or caregive* or family member or relative or informal care* or spouse) AND
TOPIC: (anx* OR anx* and depress*)
Refined by: LANGUAGES: ( ENGLISH ) AND DOCUMENT TYPES: ( ARTICLE )
Timespan: All years. Indexes: SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, BKCI-S, BKCI-SSH, ESCI, CCR-EXPANDED, IC.
222
Appendix C - Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies – the Effective
Public Health Practice Tool (EPHPP) (removed)
223
Appendix D - Statistical Analyses Summary
Study first author (date)
Study aims Level of anxiety mean (SD – unless
otherwise stated)
Relevant statistical analysis
Factors examined in relation to caregiver
anxiety
Main findings, including effect sizes (p < .05 unless otherwise stated)
Alexander (2010)
Explore gender differences in
spousal caregivers’
adjustment to stroke, including survivor’s mental
impairment, caregivers’ depressive symptoms, caregivers’
physical complaints and
caregivers’ anxiety
symptoms.
BAICut-off score
≥11 %
Female caregivers 3-months post-stroke: 10.21 (7.37), 42% 15-months post-stroke: 9.42 (7.82),
32%
Male caregivers 3-months post-stroke: 6.8
(9.65), 22% 15-months post-stroke: 4.36 (6.47),
9%
Paired t-tests assessed the changes in men and women caregivers’ anxiety over time.
Bivariate Pearson correlations assessed the
value and the significance of the
association between survivor-related
variables, caregiver demographics and caregivers’ mental
health.
Caregivers: time, depression, physical complaints, gender,
age, education
Survivors: physical functioning, mental
functioning, depression
At 15-months post-stroke, women reported significantly more symptoms of anxiety (p = .004, d
= .67).Caregiver age, caregiver education level and
survivor physical functioning were not found to be significantly associated with caregiver anxiety (p
> .05).
In male caregivers, worse survivor mental functioning was associated with higher caregiver
anxiety at 15-months post-stroke (r = -.33, p < .05).At 3-months post-stroke, higher stroke survivor depression was associated with higher female
caregiver anxiety (r = .3, p < .01). At 15-months post-stroke, higher survivor
depression was associated with higher caregiver anxiety for both genders (female r = .25, p < .05;
male r = .62, p < .001).
Anderson (1995)
Determine the impact of
caregiving for stroke survivors at 1-year post-
HADS-ACut-off ≥ 8:
37 (44%)
Chi-square test examining whether the provision of community
services has an impact on caregivers experiencing
Caregivers: relationship to stroke survivor, provision of community services
Provision of community services was not significantly associated with caregiver anxiety (p
> .05).
224
stroke. significant anxiety.
Atteih (2015)
Ascertain the factors that
influence the occurrence of anxious and depressive
symptoms in stroke caregivers.
HADS-A: 5.9 (4.7)
Cut-off ≥ 8: 31%
Logistic regression analysis examining
factors related to anxiety.
Caregivers: depression, dissatisfaction with
services, vulnerability, age, gender
Survivors: anxiety, depression, functional
ability (mRS), cognitive impairment
(MoCA)
Stroke survivor anxiety (OR = 3.47, p = .01), stroke survivor depression (OR = 5.17, p = .002), stroke
survivor cognitive impairment (OR = 2.35, p = .049), and caregiver vulnerability (OR = 4.03, p
= .023) found to be significantly related to caregiver anxiety.
No relationships between age of caregiver, gender of caregiver, dissatisfaction with care, stroke
survivor disability and the presence of anxious symptoms were found.
Carod- Assess the HADS-A: 7.8 Correlational analysis Caregivers: burden, Female caregivers experienced significantly higher
225
Artal (2009)
prevalence of burden and mood
disorders in caregivers of
Brazilian stroke survivors.
Examine the association
between burden, mood and health
status of caregivers.
(4.6)Cut-off ≥ 11:
23%
between caregiver measures and stroke
survivors.
ANOVA comparing anxiety levels between wives, husbands and
parents of stroke survivors.
gender, relationship to survivor, duration of
caring
Survivors: time since stroke, anxiety,
depression, physical functioning
anxiety compared to male caregivers (p = 0.007, not enough information reported to calculate ES). They
were also more likely to experience anxiety disorders (26% vs. 11%, chi-squared, p = 0.04, not
enough information reported to calculate ES).
Higher caregiver anxiety was associated with higher levels of burden (r = 0.61, p < .001).
Caregiver anxiety was not correlated with time since stroke or duration of caring (p > .05).
Poorer caregiver quality of life was associated with higher levels of anxiety (r = -0.57, p < .001).
Wives were significantly more likely to be anxious compared with husbands or parents (p < .001, not
enough information reported to calculate ES).
A very weak relationship between survivor’s physical functioning status and caregiver anxiety (r = 0.07, r = -0.03, r = 0.05; p < 0.05): worse physical
functioning in survivors was associated with slightly increased caregiver anxiety.
A very weak association was shown between stroke survivors with poorer mental functioning and
increased caregiver anxiety (r = -0.08, p < 0.05).Caregivers with anxious stroke survivors were more likely to be anxious themselves (r = 0.25, p < .001),
similar was shown for depressed stroke survivors and increased caregiver anxiety (r = 0.16, p < 0.05).
Choi-Kwon (2005)
Identify factors affecting
caregiver burden
HADS-ANot anxious: 106 (72%)
Student t-tests investigating factors
related to anxiety level.
Caregivers: gender, education, employment status, health, burden
Caregiver factors relating to higher caregiver anxiety were: being female (p < .05), unemployed (p < .05), poor health (p < .05), and low education
226
in South Korea, approximately 3
years after stroke.
Borderline (scored 8-10):
16 (11%)Very anxious
(Cut-off ≥ 11): 25 (17%)
ANOVA assessing the impact of anxiety on
burden.
Survivors: aphasia, physical functioning
(mRS)
level (p < .05). Caregivers with higher anxiety were significantly more likely to display higher levels of burden (F[6.66], p < .01, d = 0.71 when comparing
very anxious to not anxious).
Survivor factors associated with caregiver anxiety were having aphasia (p < .05) and a severe mRS score (i.e. poor physical functioning, p < .05).
Cumming (2008)
Assess the psychological
impact of informal
caregiving at 3-years post-stroke, investigating the impact of social
support, depression,
anxiety, irritability, strain
and caregiver gender.
IDASBorderline or
morbid anxiety (cut-off ≥ 6: 34%)
Spearman’s rho correlation between the
MOS-SSS (social support survey) and the irritability, depression
and anxiety scale (IDAS).
Multivariate binary logistic regression to
determine the contributions of variables
to each IDA subscale.
Caregivers: total social support,
emotional/informational, tangible, affectionate support, positive social
interaction, age, relationship to survivor
Survivors: patient ID, patient mRS
Multivariate regression showed that caregivers were more anxious if they had less social support (β = -
0.61, SE = .22, p = .007). Less emotional/informational support (r = 0.19, p < .05),
less tangible support (r = -0.21, p < .05) and less positive social interaction (r = -0.19, p < .05) were
significantly correlated with more anxiety.
Total social support and affectionate support were not significantly correlated with anxiety. No
relationships were found between caregiver age, caregiver relationship to the survivor, patients’
irritability/depression/anxiety and patients’ functional ability, and caregiver anxiety (p > .05).
Dankner (2016)
Compare well-being between
stroke survivors
HADS-A: 7.7 (5.1)
Cut-off ≥ 8:
Paired sample t-test comparing anxiety
between caregivers and
Caregivers: burden, sex, age
Caregivers experienced significantly higher levels of anxiety 1-year post-stroke compared to stroke
survivors (p = .02, not enough information reported
227
and their caregivers at 1-year post-stroke.
Examine associations
between well-being, survivor characteristics and caregiver
burden.
23 (45.1%) survivors.
Linear regression model for the association between caregiver
burden and anxiety.
Survivors:anxiety
to calculate ES).
Caregivers experiencing higher levels of burden were more likely to experience higher levels of anxiety (β = 1.11, SE = 0.22, t = 5.13, p < .001),
after adjusting for age and sex of caregivers.Caregiver anxiety was the only characteristic of
caregivers associated with burden.
Greenwo-od (2010)
Examine anxiety in informal
caregivers at approximately 1-
month and 3-months after the stroke survivors’
discharge.
HADS-A1-month post-
discharge: 8.33 (4.75)3-months
post-discharge: 7.87 (4.26)
Cut-off ≥ 81-month post-
discharge: 51%
3-months post-
discharge: 49%
Paired sample t-test comparing the difference
between caregiver anxiety at 1-month and
3-months post-discharge.
McNemar’s test comparing the number of caregivers classified as experiencing clinical
anxiety at 1-month post-discharge and 3-months
post-discharge.
Caregivers: time No significant difference between mean caregiver anxiety 1-month post-discharge and 3-months post-
discharge (t-test statistic = 1.56, p = 0.395).
No significant difference between the number of caregivers classified as experiencing significant
anxiety 1-month post-discharge and 3-months post-discharge (p = 0.289).
Jaracz (2014)
Evaluate the severity of
burden
HADS-A: 8.57 (4.71)
Cut-off ≥ 11:
Correlational analyses between caregiver
anxiety and factors.
Caregivers: burden, gender, sense of coherence, age
No significant difference between anxiety levels in male and female caregivers (p > .05), or between
anxiety and age of caregivers (p > .05).
228
experienced by caregivers.
Identify predictors of
caregiver burden from the
characteristics of survivors and caregivers –
focusing on sense of coherence and emotional status.
49 (33%)Correlational analyses
between caregiver anxiety with burden and
sense of coherence.
Caregivers experiencing more anxiety were more likely to experience high levels of burden (r = 0.60,
p < .10).Caregivers with a greater sense of coherence were more likely to experience less anxiety (r = .63, p
< .001).
Jaracz (2015)
Assess the prevalence of considerable
burden among stroke survivors’ caregivers at 6-months and 5-
years post-stroke.
Analyse changes in burden over
time.Identify factors associated with
burden over time.
HADS-A6 months
post-stroke: 8.1 (4.4)
Cut-off ≥ 11 for
completers: 26, (23%)
5 years post-stroke: 7.8
(5.0)Cut-off ≥ 11
for completers: 22 (19%)
Logistic regression between caregiver and survivor factors and caregiver burden.
Caregivers: time, burden
Caregivers’ level of anxiety did not significantly change between 6-months and 5-years post-stroke
(p > .05).
Higher caregiver anxiety was related to higher caregiver burden at 6-months and 5-years post-
stroke (OR = 6.82, 95% CI: 1.69–31.54, p = 0.005).
Lau (2012)
Identify factors associated with Chinese stroke
caregivers’
NR Correlational analysis between caregivers’ and
survivors’ depression with caregiver anxiety.
Caregivers: depression
Survivors: depression
Higher caregiver depressive symptomatology was correlated with more caregiver anxiety (r = 0.61, p
< .001).
229
depressive symptoms.
Higher caregiver anxiety was correlated with more depressive symptomatology in survivors (r = .03, p
< .05).
Lui (2012)
Describe the relationships
between caregiver self-
appraised problem-solving
and caregiver outcomes –
psychological health, physical well-being and
social support at 1-week prior to discharge and 3-
months post-discharge.
HADS-ADischarge = 6
(5.1)3-months
post discharge =
4.3 (4.2)
Paired t-test comparing anxiety 1-week before
discharge and 3-months post-discharge.
Caregivers: time Anxiety significantly reduced between 1-week before discharge and 3-months post-discharge (t-test = -2.43, p = 0.02, not enough information reported
to calculate ES).
Macnama-ra (1990)
Characterise caregiver strain in caregivers of stroke survivors who did not seek
professional support.
NR Multiple regression of caregiver and survivor
factors in relation to time since stroke.
Caregivers:time
Survivors: physical functioning
The longer the time since stroke, the more likely caregivers were to be anxious (β = .8172, F = 7.70, df = 1, 39, p < .01), which was not influenced by stroke survivor level of disability (in relation to
physical functioning).
Mei (2018)
Assess the relationships
between benefit
HADS-A: 7.5 (4.53)
Correlational analysis between caregiver
burden, age and benefit
Caregivers: burden, benefit finding, economic status
Caregivers with higher burden were more likely to be anxious (r = 0.60, p < .001).
Caregivers who perceived themselves to have a
230
finding, caregiver burden and
psychological well-being.
finding with caregiver anxiety.
ANOVA to examine the association between economic status and caregiver anxiety.
Survivors: agelower economic status (F = 6.36, p =.002, not
enough information reported to calculate ES) and of younger stroke survivors were more likely to be
anxious (r = -.22, p = .008).
Caregivers with lower benefit finding were also more likely to be anxious (r = -.38, p < .001).
Ozge (2009)
Investigate caregiver,
survivor and city based
characteristics in relation to
caregiver burden 6-months post-
stroke.
BAI at time of stroke:
Females: 8.6 (6.3)
Males: 4.6 (3.7)
BAI 6-months post-
stroke: Females: 7.8
(7.6) Males: 3.5
(4.8)
Cut-off ≥ 16Time of
stroke: 17%6-months
post-stroke: 15%
Mixed model analysis of factors related to
caregiver anxiety and burden.
Paired samples t-test comparing caregiver
anxiety at time of stroke to 6-months post-stroke.
Correlational analysis of survivor prognosis with
caregiver anxiety.
Caregivers: time, gender
Survivors: physical functioning
Female caregivers were more likely to be anxious post-stroke (199.25 df, F = 23.8, p < .001, d = 0.61
at 6-months post-stroke).
Caregiver anxiety significantly reduced from the time when stroke survivors had their stroke to 6-
months post-stroke (t = 2.55, p = 0.012, not enough information reported to calculate ES).
Higher caregiver anxiety was more likely in survivors with worse physical functioning (r = -
0.18, p < .05 for Glasgow Coma Scale scores; r = 0.25, p < .001 for NIH stroke scale scores; r = -0.27,
p < .001 for Barthel Index scores).
Pucciarelli (2018)
Describe stroke caregivers’
quality of life, anxiety,
HADS-ADischarge
from rehabilitation
Linear mixed-effects model to examine the relationship between
anxiety and time since
Caregivers: time, age, gender, employment
statue, education level, living situation
Caregiver anxiety significantly reduced over time (p < .001, not enough information reported to
calculate ES), up to 9-months post-discharge and then tended to increase 1-year post-discharge.
231
depression and burden at 1-year post-discharge
from a rehabilitation
hospital.
Determine baseline
predictors of stroke caregivers’
quality of life, anxiety,
depression and burden among caregivers’ and
survivors’ characteristics.
hospital: 8.13-months
post-discharge: 7.1
6-months post-
discharge: 6.59-months
post-discharge: 6.3
12-months post-
discharge: 6.6
discharge.
Linear mixed-effect model to identify
baseline predictors of caregiver anxiety.
Survivors: age, gender, comorbidities, physical
function
Only significant predictor of higher caregiver anxiety was survivor younger age (β = -.053, SE
= .02, p = .021). Caregiver female gender (p = .066) and lower physical functioning (p = .056)
approached significance. Caregiver age, survivor gender, employment
situation, education level, whether the caregiver was living with the stroke survivor and if the stroke
survivor had comorbidities did not predict caregiver anxiety.
Smith (2004)
Measure at 1-year post-stroke
informal caregivers’ stress
HADS-ANormal range:
44 (49%)
Univariate associations between survivor and
caregiver variables with caregiver anxiety.
Caregivers: hours/week caring, quality of life
Survivors: age, living
Poorer caregiver health was associated with increased caregiver anxiety (β = -0.10, SE = .02, p < .001). Total hours spent caring was associated with
higher anxiety (R2 = > 10%, β = .03, SE = .01, p
232
and coping using caregiver well-
being.
Borderline (scored 8–
10):16 (18%)
Abnormal ≥ 11:
29 (32%)
arrangements, physical functioning, anxiety, depression, quality of
life
< .01).
Higher caregiver anxiety was associated with survivors reporting higher anxiety and depression
(β =.29, SE = 0.094, R2 > 10%, p < .01; β = .39, SE = 0.13, R2 > 10%, p < .01 respectively).
Stroke survivors feeling more fatigued was also associated with higher caregiver anxiety (β = -0.08,
SE = .023, p < .05).Physical disability and decreased survivor social
activity were not significantly related to increased caregiver anxiety (p > .05), although physical
disability approached significance.
Sreedhan (2013)
Investigate employment
status and level of change of
social functioning of
stroke survivors and their
caregiver and correlate it with
severity of stroke, functional
disability, and anxiety and depression symptoms.
HADS-A: 8.07
Cut-off ≥ 11: 36 (24%)
Chi square test and Fisher exact test used to
assess correlation between employment
loss and social function decline of patient and
caregiver, with anxiety.
Univariate analysis to test the association of burden with caregiver
anxiety.
Caregivers: employment status, social functioning
variables
Caregiver employment loss post-stroke had an association with high anxiety scores (p = .047, not
enough information reported to calculate ES).Increase in frequency of visits to religious places had a significant association with high anxiety (r
= .02, p < .05).Decline in social function in relation to attending
marriages, attending other social gatherings, participating in cultural activities, visits to relative’s
place and trips for shopping were not correlated with caregiver anxiety.
Financial burden in caregivers was not found to be significantly associated with high anxiety.
Wan-Fei (2017)
Examine the effect of
depression and anxiety on
quality of life in stroke survivor-
HADS-A: 5.03 (3.85)
Multi-level modelling to assess the bi-directional
effect of survivor-caregiver factors.
Caregivers: depression, physical functioning quality of life, mental functioning quality of
life
Greater anxiety in caregivers was related to a decrease in their perceived mental functioning
quality of life (β = -0.58, p = .031).
Neither stroke survivors’ quality of life in relation to their physical function or caregivers’ quality of
233
caregiver dyads. Survivors: anxiety, depression, physical
functioning quality of life, mental functioning
quality of life
life in relation to their physical function impacted on caregivers’ anxiety (p = .87, p = .098
respectively).Stroke survivors’ quality of life in relation to their
mental functioning did not impact on caregiver anxiety (p = .722).
Williams (1993)
Pilot test questionnaires with a group of stroke survivors and caregivers.
Describe caregivers in terms of their physical and
emotional wellbeing, and their feelings
associated with possible
caregiving stress.
SQ: 14.2≥ Cut-off:
55%
Correlational analysis between caregiver
variables and anxiety.
Caregivers: burden, stress, hostility,
depression, somatic problems, visits to the doctor per year, fatigue
Higher caregiver anxiety was associated with higher levels of burden (r = 0.52, p = 0.004), more
symptoms of depression (r = 0.82, p < .001), higher levels of stress (r = 0.43, p = 0.021), higher levels
of hostility (r = 0.58, p = 0.001), more somatic problems (r = 0.65, p < .001) and more visits to the
doctor per year (r = 0.40, p = 0.042). At approximately 6-years post-stroke, higher levels of
fatigue were associated with higher levels of anxiety (r = 0.61, p < .001).
Wilz (2008)
Investigate the prevalence of and
changes in spouses’ anxiety symptoms over
time.
Explore factors
BAI3-months
post-stroke: 8.8 (7.5)
Cut-off ≥ 11: 33 (29% -
75% female)15-months
T test comparing anxiety at both time points.
Linear regression (simultaneous entry
method) used to investigate possible
factors associated with
Caregivers: time, gender, age, anxiety
Survivors: depression, dependency in everyday life
(Barthel Index)
Gender was significantly associated with anxiety at T1 and T2 (β = -0.41, p < 0.001 and β = -0.26, p <
0.05 respectively). Women’s’ mean anxiety was higher at T1 and T2 (9.7 vs 6.4, d = 0.44; 9.3 vs 5.7,
d = 0.44).Anxiety at T1 was associated with anxiety at T2 (β
= 0.57, p < 0.001).
234
associated with spousal
caregivers’ anxiety
symptoms.
post-stroke: 8.3 (8.5)
Cut-off score ≥ 18: 16
(14% - 83% female)
anxiety. Patients’ physical disability (in terms of physical functioning) was associated with anxiety at 15-
months post-stroke (β = -0.38, p < 0.05), but not at 3-months post-stroke (p > 0.05).
No associations found between anxiety and the Barthel Index, patients’ depression or age of
caregiver (p > 0.05).Note. ES = effect size.
235
Part 3: Clinical Experience
Year 1 - Year-long adult mental health placement in a Community Recovery and
Support Team
I worked with working-age adults, presenting with severe and enduring mental health
difficulties, in a community setting. Individuals had diagnosed difficulties, which included
emotionally unstable personality disorder, psychosis, bipolar affective disorder, depression
and anxiety. My responsibilities included assessment, formulation and intervention using
predominantly a cognitive behavioural therapeutic (CBT) framework, working 1:1 with
clients. I also co-facilitated a Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem-
Solving group for clients with a diagnosis of emotionally unstable personality disorder, and I
co-facilitated a psychoeducational group for patients on a psychiatric inpatient ward. I
completed an audit of the service in relation to compliance with the National Institute for
Health and Care Excellence standards for the psychological treatment of individuals with
borderline personality disorder. I co-delivered a piece of training to service users, carers and
other professionals about managing anxiety and depression, and I co-facilitated a training
session to nurses on professional boundaries and values.
Year 2 - 6-month child placement in a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service
This placement involved working with children and young people (up to the age of 17) and
their families in a community setting, where the child/young person was experiencing
moderate to severe mental health difficulties. I worked with children and young people who
had difficulties with anxiety, depression, eating (e.g. bulimia), autism spectrum conditions,
obsessive compulsive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), self-harm,
behaviour that challenges, attachment and relationship difficulties, emotional regulation and
traumatic experiences. Predominantly I used CBT to work with children, young people and
236
their significant others; behavioural approaches and systemic and attachment theories further
informed the therapeutic work. I completed behavioural observations of children and young
people in schools. I completed neuropsychological assessments with children and young
people to help understand why they were struggling academically and/or with peer relations
in school, and to inform on-going ADHD assessments. I provided a teaching session to the
multidisciplinary team I worked in, entitled: ‘Gender Identity’, which was informed by the
national Gender Identity Development Service. Additionally, I provided supervision to an
assistant psychologist in the team.
6-month older adult placement in a Memory Assessment Service (MAS)
In this placement, I worked with older adults who were suspected of developing a dementia.
Specifically, I was involved in the early assessment, diagnosis and treatment of people
suspected of developing a dementia. I completed neuropsychological assessments of people
where a diagnosis of dementia was queried; these assessments involved completing cognitive
assessments and clinical interviews with the person and a significant other. I co-facilitated a
psychoeducational group for people recently diagnosed with dementia and their support
network. I also co-facilitated a ‘Living Well with Dementia’ group to people recently
diagnosed with dementia, to help them adjust and cope with their diagnosis and associated
difficulties (e.g. anxiety and depression). I planned and co-presented a de-escalation training
session for support workers. I co-facilitated a reflective practice meeting to dementia support
workers (from a range of services) and dementia advisors.
Year 3 - 6-month learning disability placement in a Community Team for People with
Learning Disabilities (CTPLD)
This placement involved working with working-age adults with (or suspected of having) a
Learning Disability, presenting with mild to severe mental health difficulties in a community
237
setting. My responsibilities included assessment, formulation and intervention with clients
using individual CBT and behavioural approaches. Work was completed at the community
clinic, in care homes, in supported living houses and in educational settings. I also provided
indirect/consultation work to carers and staff teams in relation to anxiety and behaviour that
challenges, using systemic and behavioural models. I completed functional assessments of
behaviour that challenges using the Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) model. In addition, I
conducted neuropsychological assessments to determine eligibility for the service and to
assess for possible dementia. I co-delivered training to assistant and honorary assistant
psychologists on, ‘Assessing capacity in people with learning disabilities for consent to
participate in dementia assessments’.
6-month specialist placement in a Community Health Psychology Team and a Pain
Management Service
In my specialist placement, I worked across a Community Health Psychology Team and a
Pain Management Service with adults with a range of mild to severe mental health difficulties
and physical health conditions. The main model applied on this placement was Acceptance
and Commitment Therapy (ACT). I worked with adults with a range of difficulties including
low mood, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, eating difficulties, social isolation, fatigue,
fibromyalgia, postural tachycardia syndrome, autism spectrum conditions, hypermobility and
acquired brain injury. Clients having a history of trauma was common. I used ACT to work
with clients on an individual basis throughout assessment, formulation and intervention. I co-
facilitated an Introducing Mindfulness to Pain and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
(IMPACT) group to people with persistent pain and anxiety/low mood. In terms of teaching, I
co-facilitated a lecture to second year trainee clinical psychologists with my supervisor on
ACT.
238
Part 4: Assessments
PSYCHD CLINICAL PROGAMME
TABLE OF ASSESSMENTS COMPLETED DURING TRAINING
Year I Assessments
ASSESSMENT TITLE
WAIS WAIS Interpretation (online assessment)
Practice Report of Clinical Activity
Assessment and formulation of an Asian female in her forties diagnosed with Schizoaffective disorder unspecified presenting with hearing voices
Audio Recording of Clinical Activity with Critical Appraisal
Audio recording of clinical activity and critical appraisal of a CBT session with a White British female in her teenage years diagnosed with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder presenting with difficulties managing her emotions
Report of Clinical Activity N=1
Report of clinical activity of CBT with a White British female in late adolescence diagnosed with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder presenting with difficulties managing her emotions
Major Research Project Literature Survey
Factors Influencing Anxiety in Caregivers of Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review
Major Research Project Proposal
Self-help Relaxation for Anxiety in Caregivers of Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors
Service-Related Project An audit of compliance with the NICE standards for the psychological treatment of individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder in a Recovery and Support Team
Year II Assessments
ASSESSMENT TITLE
Report of Clinical Activity/Report of Clinical Activity –
Report of Clinical Activity of CBT with a White British female of secondary school age presenting with
239
Formal Assessment difficulties managing anxiety
PPLD Process Account A reflective process account of my experience of being part of a Personal and Professional Development group
Year III Assessments
ASSESSMENT TITLE
Presentation of Clinical Activity
Assessment, formulation, intervention and evaluation of a White British woman in her 80s presenting with difficulties with loss and isolation following dementia diagnosis
Major Research Project Literature Review
Factors Influencing Anxiety in Caregivers of Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review
Major Research Project Empirical Paper
Effectiveness of Relaxation Training for Anxiety and Depression in Family Caregivers of Long-term Stroke Survivors
Report of Clinical Activity/Report of Clinical Activity – Formal Assessment
A learning disability assessment of Tom, a man in his early thirties
Reflective Portfolio Reflective Portfolio
240