Upload
hoangdang
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EPA VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT COMPLIANCE OF PROPULSION
EQUIPMENT INTERNATIONAL WORKBOAT SHOW
NEW ORLEANS 2015
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 1 © Wärtsilä
Agenda
• Wartsila and our propulsion history
• VGP Background
• VGP areas of focus for propulsion equipment
• Types of EAL oils on the market
• Propulsor Changes for required for compliance
• Propulsion Equipment Test Methods
• Alternate technologies, ie water lube, barrier seals
• Life Expectancies of EAL’s
• Partnerships and Fleet Size of VGP Compliant Vessels
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 2 © Wärtsilä
This is Wartsila
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 3 © Wärtsilä
ENERGY SOLUTIONS (Power Plants)
MARINE SOLUTIONS
SERVICES
THIS IS WARTSILA
THIS IS WӒRTSILӒ
THIS IS WӒRTSILӒ
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 4 © Wärtsilä
MERCHANT CRUISE & FERRY NAVY SPECIAL VESSELS OFFSHORE
SHIPPING OIL & GAS
THIS IS WӒRTSILӒ
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 5 © Wärtsilä
The most complete marine
offering on earth
THIS IS WӒRTSILӒ
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 6 © Wärtsilä
• Wartsila’s propulsion group came through acquisition of
LIPS in the Netherlands in 2002
• LIPS’ experience dates back to 1882 with many industry
records and firsts
• Propulsion product lines include
– Fixed and Controllable Propellers,
– Steerable and Tunnel Thrusters,
– Waterjets
– Gearboxes
– Propulsion Controls
• References include tunnel thrusters on many premier
cruise lines, waterjets for US Navy, DP capable thrusters
for Harvey Gulf LNG PSV’s, Gears and CPP’s for Seacor
and Crowley ATB’s etc.
THIS IS WӒRTSILӒ
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 7 © Wärtsilä
MEUR 2014 20132 20123 2011 2010
Order intake 5 084 4 821 4 940 4 516 4 005
Operating result 1 569 557 517 469 487
% of net sales 1 11.9 12.1 10.9 11.1 10.7
17,700 70 200
PROFESSIONALS COUNTRIES LOCATIONS
VGP Background • Clean Water Act (CWA), originally enacted in 1948 and revised in 1972, as the Federal law
governing surface waters in the USA. The CWA has 5 key sections:
1. a system of minimum national effluent standards for each industry;
2. water quality standards;
3. a discharge permit program that translates these standards into enforceable limits;
4. provisions for special problems such as toxic chemicals and oil spills ; and,
5. a revolving construction loan program (formerly a grant program) for publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs).
• 1973, EPA enacts regulation exempting several categories of vessel discharges from National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES ) permitting requirements (section 402 of CWA)
– 40 C.F.R. §122.3(a), exempts “any discharge of sewage from vessels, effluent from properly functioning marine engines,
laundry, shower, and galley sink wastes from vessels, or any other discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel”
from the permitting requirements of the NPDES program.
• 2005, Northwest Environmental Advocates, the Ocean Conservancy, and San Francisco
Baykeeper (collectively NWEA) brought suit and won in federal district court against the US EPA,
alleging that such regulation exempting was beyond the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
• 2008, On appeal the EPA again lost in the 9th Circuit
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 8 © Wärtsilä
VGP Background
• 2008, EPA preliminary version of Vessel General Permit (VGP) becomes effective. For commercial, non-
military vessels over 79 feet operating in US waters. Compliance was not mandatory.
• 2013, EPA enacts current version of VGP. Covers 27 effluent vessel discharges. EPA estimates this affects
61,000 US flagged vessels and 8,000 foreign. For propulsion equipment this effects:
1. Coatings
2. Anodes
3. Oil-to-Sea Interfaces
• 2014, EPA sVGP for non-recreation, non-military vessels below 79 feet. Was to go into effect December
2014 however its full implementation has been delayed 2 years (only Ballast Water rules in effect for vessels
other than fishing). This will affect up to 138,000 vessels with similar requirements as the VGP.
– These smaller vessels may potentially be permanently exempted per pending Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (VIDA).
• Similar rules are expected to expand elsewhere. Eventually not just US waters.
• DNV Clean Notation requirements for stern tube lubrication are similar to VGP2013.
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 9 © Wärtsilä
1. Coatings
• VGP’s focus on coatings is primarily on anti-foulants and general coating condition and
cleaning processes and generally not in the scope of propulsion suppliers
• These rules can be very port and biocide specific
– “Copper Impaired Ports” can restrict usage of copper, Los Angeles/Long Beach
– Tributyltin (TBT) banned
• Due to the nature of now required Environmentally Approved Lubricants (EAL’s), coatings are
generally limited to epoxy based products
– Typical of the industry already
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 10 © Wärtsilä
2. Anodes
• Recommends, particularly for new vessels, the use of Impressed Current
Cathodic Protection (ICCP)
• Operators should note that magnesium is less toxic than aluminum and
aluminum is less toxic than zinc
• Anodes should be flush mounted or backfilled behind anode to hull
• Calls out cleaning procedures
• Freshwater vessel must document why the use of magnesium is not
appropriate if aluminum or zinc is selected
• Seawater vessels must document why aluminum is not appropriate if zinc is
selected.
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 11 © Wärtsilä
3. Oil-to-Sea Interfaces
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 12 © Wärtsilä
TRANSVERSE
THRUSTERS
“All vessels must use an EAL in all oil to sea interfaces, unless technically
infeasible.” - Technically Infeasible must be reported annually to USCG.
CPP HUBS
STERN TUBE
RUDDER
BEARINGS
STEERABLE
THRUSTERS
Technically infeasible means
1. No EAL’s approved for use
2. No alternatives with EAL’s
3. EAL’s not available in port of call
4. Need dry dock to convert
Main Types of EAL Lubricants
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 13 © Wärtsilä
– Synthetic Esters (HEES):
• Fluid type of majority of EAL suppliers, where initial testing has focused
• Made from a weak non-vegetable based acid and alcohol combination
• Panolin GreenMarine Line (Stella Maris, EP etc), Castrol BioStat, ExxonMobile Aware,
Kluber KluberBio, Shell Naturelle, Vickers Biogear
– Polyalphaolefins (HEPR or PAOs):
• Chemically close to mineral oils with similar compatibilities
• Synthesized from crude oil
• RSCBio’s EnviroLogic
– Polyalkylene Glycols (HEPG or PAGs):
• Interest as these fluids have densities higher than water and are therefore non-sheening
• uses polyalkylene glycols (PAGS) as the base fluid which are synthesized from natural gas
• American Chemical Technologies' Neptune
– Vegetable Oil / Triglycerides (HETG):
• Author has no market knowledge of such EALS
• Not suitable for geared units, degrade too quickly
– Water
• Suitable for stern tubes only
• Recommended by the EPA per the VGP for stern tubes
Wärtsilä Propulsion intent is to ensure broad
compatibility with EAL’s.
What Makes EAL an EAL?
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 14 © Wärtsilä
• 3 characteristics (per ASTM, ISO, CEC, OCED standards)
– Biodegradability - measure of the breakdown of a chemical by micro-organisms
– Aquatic Toxicity - low toxicity to aquatic organisms
– Bioaccumulation - build-up of chemicals within the organism’s tissues over time
• Who Certifies an EAL is Environmentally Approved?
– National Labeling Programs
• Blue Angel - German, developed in 1988, very stringent
• Swedish Standard - collaboration between industry and government
– International Labeling Programs
• Nordic Swan - Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, and Denmark, higher
renewable content requirements
• European Eco-label – 2005 EU initiative, closest to an international
standard available
• OSPAR – 15 nations operating in the North East Atlantic offshore oil and
gas fields
– EPA’s Design for the Environment (DfE)
– Self Certification
• Supplier can contract with laboratories to follow the prescribed tests
What Makes EAL an EAL?
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 15 © Wärtsilä
• In addition to these main types of EAL base stocks, additives are
included to modify the viscosity and other properties
• Fluids are approved for EAL use as previously noted, it is not the
propulsor OEM scope
• Fluids are also tested by the oil supplier for (16) characteristics.
These include:
– Shear Stability (permanent and temporary loss of viscosity)
– Lubricity, ability to build boundary layer
– Viscosity, VI
– Oxidation Stability
– Thermal Stability
– Varnish, Sludge and Foam Formation
– Hydrolytic Stability, how much water can be present
– etc
Propulsor Changes for EAL Use
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 16 © Wärtsilä
• Material compatibility 80+ part #’s on a steerable thruster to evaluate; 30+ on a transverse thruster:
– Dynamic seals (propeller shaft seals), static and semi-static seals (O-rings,
quad-rings, gaskets) need to be Viton (FKM) with additives to ensure
compatibility and service life with EAL. Specific HNBR elastomers are also
allowed.
– Hoses
– Epoxy coatings are prescribed to avoid stripping; coatings containing free
zinc (not chemically bound) are not allowed.
• Water Separation
– Initially mandatory but potentially replaced with monitoring in the future
• Ambient water infiltration
– Desiccant caps on oil tank breathers
• No stationary oil volumes (dead heading); continuous oil flow throughout
propulsor
• Proper EAL selection for Application
– Stern tube, gear, hydraulic fluids are all required
– Different viscosity and friction properties of EAL need to be taken into
account
Static and semi-
static seals • O-rings
• Quad-rings
• Gaskets
Hoses
Coatings
Breathers/
breather-fillers
Gears/
bearings/
wet clutch
Dynamic seals • Propeller shaft
• Steering seals
Elastomer testing (1)
• Elastomer testing of
– Dynamic seals (propeller shaft, steering, blade foot seals)
– Static seals (O-rings, quad-rings, gaskets, other static seals)
• Compatibility tests are carried out for dynamic and/or static operating
conditions
– Multiple elastomer suppliers and elastomer types
– Multiple EAL suppliers and types (main focus: conditionally approved EAL list)
– Relevant conditions (clean EAL, 5% water, 5% seawater)
• Criteria (parameters affecting sealing capability)
– Volume change
– Hardness change
– Tensile strength change
– Elongation change
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 17 © Wärtsilä
Elastomer testing (2)
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 18 © Wärtsilä
Volume
change
Hardness
change
Tensile
strength
change
Ultimate
elongation
change
Volume
change
Hardness
change
Tensile
strength
change
Ultimate
elongation
change
Volume
change
Hardness
change
Tensile
strength
change
Ultimate
elongation
change
100% EAL
95% EAL + 5% water
95% EAL + 5% seawater
100% EAL
95% EAL + 5% water
95% EAL + 5% seawater
100% EAL
95% EAL + 5% water
95% EAL + 5% seawater
100% EAL
95% EAL + 5% water
95% EAL + 5% seawater
100% EAL
95% EAL + 5% water
95% EAL + 5% seawater
100% EAL
95% EAL + 5% water
95% EAL + 5% seawater
100% EAL
95% EAL + 5% water
95% EAL + 5% seawater
Supplier 3
Conditionally approved EAL list
EAL product X
Viscosity 150
EAL product X
Viscosity 100
EAL product Y
Viscosity 68
EAL product X
Viscosity 150
EAL product X
Viscosity 100
EAL product X
Viscosity 150
EAL product X
Viscosity 100
Supplier 1
Elastomer type Z
Supplier 2
Test matrix for elastomeric materials with EALs for general (semi-) static operating conditions
Supplier 1
Elastomer type X
Supplier 2
Elastomer type Y
Supplier 3
• Tests are being carried out by the suppliers in close
cooperation with Wärtsilä
• Considering f.e. 3 elastomer suppliers, 7 EAL types
(from 3 suppliers), 3 conditions and 4 criteria, >250
tests have to be carried out (21 x 12 matrix).
• Test program is progressing
• For all elastomer (seal) components a solution tested
with multiple EAL brands is now available
Water Separation
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 19 © Wärtsilä
• For initial installations, a water separator is
mandatory. However work is underway to re-
evaluate this approach.
• If separation is eventually deemed not mandatory
as knowledge base increases, then continuous
water content monitoring will be required with
potential corrective action possibly a separator.
• Significant R&D work on-going for water removal
technologies. The state of art is the Jensen CJC
D10 filter. This is not a standard CJC filter system.
• The D10 is a “desorber” and not affected by
viscosity or additives.
• Oil is pre-heated to 60o C, cold air then flows
through the oil and absorbs water present later to
be condensed out.
Thruster Test Rig
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 20 © Wärtsilä
• Full scale testing on the Propulsion
Test Center in Tuusula, Finland in
cooperation with VTT Tech Research
Center
• fully loading a thruster, including
overloads
• reproducing relevant temperature /
cooling conditions
• reproducing propeller loads, including
eccentricity, & structural loads
• measure torque, rpm, temperature,
vibration, displacement etc.
Eliminate Oil-to Water Interfaces (Water)
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 21 © Wärtsilä
• Water lubricated stern tubes
– Generally these are open stern tubes whereby seawater is pumped in from the sea chest and flushes out the aft
– Utilize rubber or composite bearings instead of white metal
– Eliminate the aft seal, and utilizes a fwd seal only where the stern tube penetrates the hull
– Stern tube designed for corrosion protection, to ensure water flow for cooling etc
– Propeller shaft to be stainless, stainless clad or fiberglass wrapped for corrosion
– New build or retrofits too
– Need to consider bearing and journal wear as well as shaft survey requirements (especially CPP)
SHAFT
Aft
BEARING
Fwd
BEARING
SEAL
Eliminate Oil-to-Water Interfaces (Barrier)
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 22 © Wärtsilä
• Barrier seals
– Essentially separate the lubrication oil from the seawater with a void space or air chamber that is monitored and
discharges to the engine room without the possibility of discharge to sea.
– These seal types have been around for decades and are very reliable
– Allow continued use of mineral oil
– However should a mineral oil result in a spill, the USCG/EPA can issue significant fines and clean up fees
– Originally these were not acknowledged by the EPA but with 3rd party verification they are an acceptable way to
meet the intent of the EPA VGP.
• For example LR, Design Appraisal Document
“This is to record that the undernoted products have been subject to desktop review in respect of meeting the
requirements of United States Environmental Protection Agency Vessel General Permit 2013. The product
details have been reviewed to establish whether in normal operation the seal presents an “oil to sea”
interface.”
Eliminate Oil-to-Water Interfaces (Barrier)
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 23 © Wärtsilä
Standby
Lip Seal Oil Sealing
Lip
Oil 0.2 Bar Air Space
0 Bar Sea Water
0.3 – 2.0 Bar
FACE TYPE LIP TYPE
Sea Water
Air space
Standby
Lip Seal
Oil Sealing
Lip
Constant flow
of air
Life Expectancies
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 24 © Wärtsilä
• While these EALs have been in use for many years
already, the use of EAL fluids in propulsors is still in the
learning phase.
• The difference in marine systems is the incidental water
that potentially enters the system that can break the EAL
down and how effective water polishers can remove it.
• All manufacturers are stating that their fluids will have a
lifetime of at least 5 years, dry dock to dry dock. In some
cases extended life over traditional mineral oil.
• Most also state that with filtering, the fluids can be likely
be re-used
Operator, Oil Supplier, OEM Partnership
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 25 © Wärtsilä
• VGP compliance is not a scare tactic
• Mineral oils had decades of legacy work already
built in, since the 1920’s
• Lab testing of each new oil is costly and time
consuming.
• $200-300K
• 3 to 6 months
• Limited test rig availability
• Can the stakeholders share some risk for field
trials if a chosen oil has not been tested yet for a
given application?
Operator, Oil Supplier, OEM Partnership
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 26 © Wärtsilä
• Wartsila has made a pubic statement May 2015 that all our
new build propulsion equipment can be made EPA VGP
compliant.
• In-Serv vessels are taken on a case by case basis
• We accomplish this with a combination of
• EAL lubricants,
• barrier seals
• Barrier EAL’s
• water lubricated stern tubes
• To date we have on order or delivered
• 30+ Vessels with CPP systems
• 50+ Vessels with Tunnel Thruster
• 5,000+ Vessels with FPP systems
• Several EAL’s OK’d
Thank You
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 27 © Wärtsilä
IS VGP COMPLIANCE ON YOUR HORIZON?
Special Thank you to the following:
• Jeanne Grasso at Blank Rome LLP
• Tyler Kutcha and Mark Miller at RSC Bio
• Scott Kovanda at American Chemical Technologies
• Phil Cumberlidge at Panolin
• Wartsila’s Joost van Eijnatten, Elias Boletis
Brian Fariello
Business Sales Propulsion
+1 954 465 8267
References
15 December 2015 Presentation name / Author 28 © Wärtsilä
http://elawreview.org/news/northwest-environmental-advocates-v-u-s-environmental-protection-agency
http://www.bdlaw.com/news-litigation-459.html
http://www2.epa.gov/national-pollutant-discharge-elimination-system-npdes/vessels-incidental-
discharge-permitting-5
RSCBio - Envirologic, http://rscbio.com
American Chemical Technologies - Neptune, http://americanchemtech.com/
Panolin – GreenMarine Line (Stella Maris, EP, etc) http://panolin.com
Castrol - Biostat, http://www.castrol.com/